Military Review

The Crimean shipbuilding enterprise “More” is provided with orders worth more than 3 billion rubles

49
The Crimean shipyard “More” received orders for a total amount of 3,4 billion rubles this year, reports Flotprom with reference to the Russian Shipping portal.


Layout of the ISC project 22800

According to the director of the enterprise, Vyacheslav Zachinyaev, “there is an order in this portfolio that the fiberglass shop created on the Sea must carry out”.

He noted that by the autumn at the plant "it is planned to complete capital works on the modernization of the hull workshop." “Until the end of the year, liabilities under the investment agreement in the form of investments 600 mln. Rub. will be met, ”the director added.

The publication reminds that in May of this year the company began to fulfill an order for the construction of three small rocket ships of the 22800 project.

Resource Help: "The small rocket ship of the 22800 project (code" Karakurt ") was developed by the Almaz design bureau. The length of the ship is 60 meters, width - 10 meters, draft - 4 meters. The main power plant is diesel-electric, Russian-made. Maximum speed is 30 knots, cruising range 2500 miles, autonomy 15 days. Armament: 100-mm or 76-mm automatic artillery and anti-aircraft missile-gun complex Pantsir-M or Palma. In the superstructure of the ship there is a shock complex with an eight-container installation for the Caliber-NK missiles. ”
Photos used:
"Weapons of Russia"
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Chicot 1
    Chicot 1 14 July 2016 14: 01
    -4
    Quote: jarome
    And if Krvm stayed in Ukraine, the enterprise would have produced sausages and bananas clinging to jet skis.

    Didn't stay ...
    1. Chicot 1
      Chicot 1 15 July 2016 00: 34
      0
      Quote: Chicot 1
      Quote: jarome
      And if Krvm stayed in Ukraine, the enterprise would have produced sausages and bananas clinging to jet skis.

      Didn't stay ...

      I would like to see the supporters of the abandonment of the Crimea as a part of Ukraine who have set minuses ... Show your muzzles. Or the gut is thin ...
  2. Atlant-1164
    Atlant-1164 14 July 2016 14: 01
    +8
    they say about such .. small yes delete.
  3. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 14 July 2016 14: 05
    +1
    This means that they will build boxes with a fiberglass hull to reduce the mass of the ship.
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 14 July 2016 15: 29
      +4
      Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
      This means that they will build boxes with a fiberglass hull to reduce the mass of the ship.

      Here, not only a decrease in the mass of the hull, but also a decrease in physical fields.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 14 July 2016 15: 48
        -9
        For some reason, in such topics, you will not find a single Stalinist communist during the day with fire. A new ship will be accepted, there will not be a single one either. He will jar them from something like that.
        Kabardin, even if you’d be noted, write that this is the last breath of Russia. The patriots are bad.
        1. Neputin
          Neputin 14 July 2016 16: 59
          +10
          Yes, because the Stalinists Communists do not comment on the release of motor boats. Here hand over at least 1 (one Karl!) Destroyer, then we’ll talk. But in fairness, it should be noted better RTOs in hand than a missile destroyer in dreams. So the news +.
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 14 July 2016 18: 03
            -2
            Quote: Neputin
            Yes, because the Stalinists Communists do not comment on the release of motor boats

            Funny and you are funny!
          2. Observer2014
            Observer2014 14 July 2016 18: 17
            +4
            Neputin (1) RU Today, 16:59 PM ↑ New
            Yes, because the Stalinists Communists do not comment on the release of motor boats. Here hand over at least 1 (one Karl!) Destroyer, then we’ll talk. But in fairness, it should be noted better RTOs in hand than a missile destroyer in dreams. So the news +.
            Do you want me to reveal to you a terrible state secret ?!. This "kid" With eight "Caliber" alone, if loaded with nuclear warheads, will put any NATO country in Europe in a knee-operated position
          3. Felix99
            Felix99 15 July 2016 08: 46
            0
            This began the restoration of the Crimean industry, jobs. It's good.
    2. avt
      avt 14 July 2016 15: 48
      +1
      Quote: Exorcist Liberoids
      This means that they will build boxes with a fiberglass hull to reduce the mass of the ship.

      Why is it necessary for the body? It’s more likely for boats and trawls, and so add-ons for those who are pretty good go plastic ones. Protection for the radar again.
      Quote: Amurets
      Here, not only a decrease in the mass of the hull, but also a decrease in physical fields.

      Yes, all in the end.
  4. Wolka
    Wolka 14 July 2016 14: 07
    +6
    To call this fleet a mosquito is no longer a language, however, strength and what ...
    1. silver_roman
      silver_roman 14 July 2016 16: 37
      +2
      Quote: Volka
      to call this fleet a mosquito is no longer a language

      The mosquito fleet was numerous, but still not universal.
      And the caliber works both on ships and on land. True, in the form of anti-ship missiles, the range is much less, nevertheless, it seems like 300 km. bullets.
      Pleases range. For BF and Black Sea Fleet - an ideal tool and even an element of projection of force.
      Think who knows what atm warhead on that caliber? And under the gun all of Europe with all the NATO bases in the region.
      Only the Yankees are sitting in a puddle. but for them there are much tastier buns.

      By the way, I read that buoyans were developed as RTOs of the marine coastal and river zones, and the latter imposed certain restrictions on the draft. Because of this, the bottom of the ship was designed so that it significantly reduced the range. What is the situation here? Because 2500 miles it can be loaded with fuel at most do not spoil ?!
  5. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 14 July 2016 14: 08
    -1
    It is not entirely clear whether the word was about the fiberglass workshop, or about small rocket ships. Or talk about the fact that "Karakurt" will be built from fiberglass, although this was not laid down during the design (at least it was not mentioned).
    1. Hey
      Hey 14 July 2016 17: 37
      -1
      Perhaps in the future minesweepers will do.
  6. aszzz888
    aszzz888 14 July 2016 14: 13
    0
    With good initiative, Crimeans! We are happy, enemies (ukrokaklam - zrada) and other spite!
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. black
    black 14 July 2016 14: 24
    0
    Toothy cutter. Beautifully thought up.
  9. Potter
    Potter 14 July 2016 14: 26
    +5
    Quote: Expelling Liberoids
    This means that they will build boxes with a fiberglass hull to reduce the mass of the ship.

    The case is metal. Add-ons are composite. And to reduce displacement, and to ensure stability (lowering the center of mass, respectively, ensuring metacentric height) and to reduce visibility for radars.
  10. drunkram
    drunkram 14 July 2016 14: 42
    0
    Excuse me, if this is an RTO in the picture, then where is his missile mine?
    1. KaPToC
      KaPToC 14 July 2016 21: 01
      -1
      left picture
  11. Holsten
    Holsten 14 July 2016 14: 44
    +2
    A group of such boats will present a real threat to any AUG.
    1. Izotovp
      Izotovp 14 July 2016 15: 01
      -2
      Here, perhaps, it is worth thinking about equipping such a boat with an anti-ship missile with a shorter range, but with a higher speed in order to restrain the actions of "guests" who have looked into the Black Sea.
  12. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 14 July 2016 15: 01
    +4
    Minesweepers are built from fiberglass, for obvious reasons. And "Karakurt" made of normal steel. As it dealt with one. He (a real spider) is so fast ... I broom him, and he jumped on the broom and ran to me on the handle. I barely managed to drop it. Such ships will get from the Bosphorus to Gibraltar. And if they are released into the ocean ... In peacetime it has an autonomy of 15 days, and not in peacetime?
  13. OlegLex
    OlegLex 14 July 2016 15: 28
    +4
    Great news and great ship. And I’m glad that more than three yards will be poured into the economy of Crimea, which will significantly raise the standard of living of Crimeans and the defense of Russia
  14. Uryukc
    Uryukc 14 July 2016 15: 30
    -7
    Quote: tiredwithall
    But the "toy" is good, good in all respects! And bites great too


    I don’t understand your optimism, what will prevent the enemy submarine from sinking 22800? Why is this undercoat or overgrowth boat better than 11356 with which they are replaced (https://topwar.ru/78127-malye-raketnye-korabli-proekta-22800-zamenyat-fregaty-p
    roekta-11356.html)? Why do we need so many small ships when you can poke coastal complexes in Kaliningrad on the Kuril Islands, etc. reinforcing them with naval aviation and DPL?
    Sincerely.
    1. alexmach
      alexmach 14 July 2016 22: 45
      0
      Than this undercoat or overgrowth boat is better than 11356 with which they are replaced


      What do you mean by what? We can build 22800 already at many shipyards at once, but we cannot build 11356, there are no engines and it is not clear whether they will be at all. In my opinion this is a very significant advantage.

      11356 Submarines from an ambush also easily send to the bottom.
      1. Uryukc
        Uryukc 15 July 2016 17: 39
        -1
        I just want to clarify, do you seriously think that 2-3 boats are better than one frigate? I hope that the MO chose the best option (they know better), but unfortunately I can not understand their logic. In my opinion, it was more logical to direct resources to other projects, at least to the same Varshavyanka.
        1. alexmach
          alexmach 16 July 2016 14: 15
          +1
          I just want to clarify, do you seriously think that 2-3 boats are better than one frigate?


          Where did you get this question from? Who faced such a choice? Frigates cannot be built, so the question is “What's better, MRC or nothing?” As for me, the answer is obvious.

          In my opinion, it was more logical to direct resources to other projects, at least to the same Varshavyanka.


          But I won’t take it into account. Perhaps it was possible to direct resources to something else, or maybe it is not so simple. What will happen to the shipyards, if they were to deprive them of orders for a couple of years, would they give orders for the construction of frigates in a couple of years? But is there anyone to build these additional Warsaw? It also remains to be hoped that someone sensible somewhere weighed everything and not just jabbed a finger at the first solution that came up.
          1. Uryukc
            Uryukc 16 July 2016 14: 33
            +1
            Agree
    2. KCA
      KCA 15 July 2016 10: 17
      +1
      Nuclear submarines and even diesel submarines to hunt for boats? nurse, strong, a hundred boats and one submarine, I wonder who will win? at a comparable cost of several hundred boats and 1 nuclear submarine
      1. Uryukc
        Uryukc 15 July 2016 17: 34
        -1
        Is it about hundreds? I don’t know, of course, but they’ll probably build 20 and calm down. For 1 submarine per hundred boats — the submarine wins - he drowns everything he can and then leaves with impunity (theoretical confrontation without the participation of other forces). In addition, only TURK of submarines has more than the entire Black Sea Fleet.
  15. xant
    xant 14 July 2016 15: 39
    +5
    and also: The United Shipbuilding Corporation (USC) is creating a shipbuilding cluster in Crimea, which will include a branch of the Zvezdochka ship repair center at Sevmorzavod, the Korall design bureau, the Feodosia Sudokompozit shipyard and the Sevastopol State University. Crimean shipbuilders have already received the first shipbuilding orders and are preparing for cooperation with other USC enterprises. Zaliv entered the financial group Ak Bars.
    The work is on and it pleases!
  16. Backfire
    Backfire 14 July 2016 15: 54
    -1
    Great news as they say small spool so expensive.
    1. Mikado
      Mikado 14 July 2016 17: 17
      +1
      Quote: Beckfire
      Great news as they say small spool so expensive.

      Well done! If such ships arrive at the Baltic and the Black Sea, this will be enough for the enemy to be careful not to roam there, and, if desired, the barmaleevs can bend the Caliber. And then you can make them for export. It's early, of course, to rejoice, but congratulations to the sailors and shipbuilding workers!
  17. red_october
    red_october 14 July 2016 16: 04
    +2
    Quote: Uryukc
    Quote: tiredwithall
    But the "toy" is good, good in all respects! And bites great too


    I don’t understand your optimism, what will prevent the enemy submarine from sinking 22800? Why is this undercoat or overgrowth boat better than 11356 with which they are replaced (https://topwar.ru/78127-malye-raketnye-korabli-proekta-22800-zamenyat-fregaty-p

    roekta-11356.html)? Why do we need so many small ships when you can poke coastal complexes in Kaliningrad on the Kuril Islands, etc. reinforcing them with naval aviation and DPL?
    Sincerely.


    The question, unfortunately, does not arise between pr. 22800 and 11356. The last three of SKRs 11356 is unclear when it will appear in Sevastopol. And 22800 are under construction and they will surely become part of the Black Sea Fleet faster. And at least one function of larger brothers can be performed. Submarine defense will be provided by the forces of the operating TFRs and "Varshavyanka".

    And the main caliber of the "karakurt" is not only missile launchers for work on land, but also anti-ship missiles, which will not get anywhere from the shore where needed. It will not work to keep the 6th fleet at gunpoint from the Black Sea only.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Uryukc
      Uryukc 15 July 2016 18: 33
      +1
      Thanks for the informative comment.
      So, how ugly it turns out, the 20380 universal corvette is handsome, with subsonic uraniums, and this one is undercoating with yachts, sad honestly.
  18. Elephant
    Elephant 14 July 2016 17: 00
    +1
    Nice boat. Just behind, what is this flag stand?
  19. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 14 July 2016 17: 27
    0
    Although they breathe deeply, they will show what they are capable of. For 25 years, devastation of ideas has accumulated when they fell asleep facing the wall, for a century and a half of work!
  20. ProkletyiPirat
    ProkletyiPirat 14 July 2016 18: 47
    0
    I do not judge the qualities of warships 22800, 21631 and the like ...
    but personally, I think that we (the Russian Federation) primarily need ships that meet these conditions:
    1) a river-sea class, more precisely suitable for transporting on inland waters of the Russian Federation
    2) having a platform for a helicopter, (a helicopter hangar is optional)
    3) armed with cruise missiles (caliber or equivalent), artillery mount and anti-aircraft mount (shell or equivalent)
    4) transfer across the ocean to work in a "friendly" coastal area, including across the northern route

    Such ships will be ideal for the Black Sea Fleet, BF, the "internal" Sea of ​​Okhotsk as the main ship. And only then you can rivet all other ship classes to create groupings.
  21. APASUS
    APASUS 14 July 2016 21: 06
    +1
    I don’t want to upset the patriots, but the More recently was in such a jo ... So first we need to make modernization.
  22. stonks
    stonks 14 July 2016 23: 27
    0
    Very beautiful ship.
    And everything beautiful in technology is functional.
    And armament makes it quite consistent with the deadly name of his project.
    1. ProkletyiPirat
      ProkletyiPirat 15 July 2016 13: 33
      0
      more correct not
      beautiful - functional
      а
      functional - beautiful