Latvian Defense Ministry proposed to adapt the former Soviet military town under the NATO range

37
The Latvian military leadership proposed that the Skrunda Provincial Duma transfer the former military camp to the central government in order to create a NATO test site on its territory, reports RIA News message delfi.

Latvian Defense Ministry proposed to adapt the former Soviet military town under the NATO range


According to the portal, the local Duma "must make a decision in the coming months."

“In Skrunda, it would be possible to conduct tactical exercises in an urban environment. The former military camp is a unique object, ”said Republic’s Defense Minister Raimonds Bergmanis.

The publication notes that over the past 15 years, the military camp has changed several owners. “The buildings have fallen into decay, they have taken everything valuable out of them. A year ago, the object became the property of the local government, ”writes the resource.

In Soviet times, a short-range radar was located in Skrunda, which was detonated after Latvia gained independence. The area of ​​the town is 45 ha.





  • http://rai77.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

37 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    14 July 2016 11: 39
    Yes ... How many of them are left here, abandoned, on the territory of the former Union ...
    1. +5
      14 July 2016 11: 41
      And people could live. But for Latvians, this is apparently a bit of a bastard - to live in former Soviet military camps. Or maybe there is already nobody?
      1. +4
        14 July 2016 11: 57
        Quote: SRC P-15
        And people could live. But for Latvians, this is apparently a bit of a bastard - to live in former Soviet military camps. Or maybe there is already nobody?


        Most likely not to anyone, but there are a lot of such towns.
        1. +3
          14 July 2016 12: 09
          Decline because these countries since the days of the USSR are used to living at the expense of someone. This mentality has remained so far. After all, they do not know how to build.
        2. 0
          14 July 2016 12: 52
          Balts like rats scatter all over the world, they feel what kind of Tryndets Nata is driving, there remains a schiz. It is not clear why the Russians do not declare their presence there., As in the Donbass ??? Nothing! Our politicians do not work in this direction, or is everything a secret !?
          1. 0
            14 July 2016 13: 33
            The Russians there will take everything without war.
            1. 0
              14 July 2016 17: 09
              At the training ground, NATO will be trained to conduct cleansing operations in typical Soviet Khrushchevs. The idea is clear. But can they reach ..?
    2. +1
      14 July 2016 11: 44
      And why do I hate the Baltic states without ever having been there ....
      1. +4
        14 July 2016 11: 48
        Quote: Dimontius
        And why do I hate the Baltic states without ever having been there ....

        Well, it's you in vain. Everywhere there are people who are bad and good. Latvia is no exception.
      2. 0
        14 July 2016 11: 59
        From limited information. The Baltics must be loved, this is the former Yarov Rus, the homeland of the Wends. By the way, the toponym "Rugen" in the Latvian language, due to the absence of the letter "u", sounds like "Rigen", which corresponds to the toponym "Riga".
        1. +1
          14 July 2016 13: 37
          No need to repeat this absurdity.
          Wends lived much to the west. They directly bordered the Utahs and Saxons.
        2. +2
          14 July 2016 15: 02
          Loving, grooming and cherishing the Baltic states is harmful, as historical experience has shown. In Sweden, hedgehogs did not survive, being dependent on Germany did not arise either. But when they were made a showcase for the West in the Soviet Union and almost ran after her with a handkerchief, they became insolent and decided that it would be so all the time. And when the USSR collapsed (not without help) and they had to survive on their own, they preferred to lie under the USA, and America did not indulge too much with (e) the Baltics. So do you need to love? And for what? For their attitude to the Russians? For the institution of non-citizenship? For escalating hysteria? Tolerate - yes. But to love everyone - no, pipes. Natives of the Baltic countries who love their homeland are worthy of respect, but do not impose this love on the rest. We got it already, chesslovo!
      3. 0
        14 July 2016 13: 19
        Because of the ruling evil spirits all over the head, why should the Baltic hate ???
      4. -1
        14 July 2016 14: 27
        Quote: Dimontius
        And why do I hate the Baltic states without ever having been there ....

        And this is at the genetic level. I'm not joking. Remember Alexander Nevsky. And these are links to genes.
        http://www.chuchotezvous.ru/historical-tragedies/651.html
        http://www.syl.ru/article/180395/new_livonskiy-orden-istoriya-sozdaniya-bratstvo

        -ryitsarey-hrista-livonii
        http://rushist.com/index.php/tutorials/plat-tutorial/63-plat-tut-35
    3. +1
      14 July 2016 11: 53
      Yes ... How many of them are left here, abandoned, on the territory of the former Union ...

      And on the territory of the countries of the former Warsaw Pact, especially where are the NATO bases now? And the rest from the GBV? Surrendered to the enemy
      1. +4
        14 July 2016 12: 07
        Quote: Knizhnik
        And the rest from the GBV? Surrendered to the enemy

        For all the abandoned military camps, starting from the western borders of the Warsaw Pact countries and ending with the former Soviet republics, special thanks to the Great Perestroika. And thanks to him for dozens, if not hundreds, of thousands of broken human destinies from people living in these territories. The wreckage of a great country - the USSR, whether it be an abandoned military town, a collapsed factory or an unnecessary house of culture - this is a clear demonstration of how to spoil the best idea.
    4. +3
      14 July 2016 11: 59
      how many total did the Soviet Union build for these ungrateful cattle. how many lives did they put during the Great Patriotic War ... so many of these Baltic countries were built that they owe us 1 OHULEARD
    5. 0
      14 July 2016 12: 31
      Lots and lots...
  2. +2
    14 July 2016 11: 45
    For almost 30 years, the Skrunda radar has been monitoring outer space in order to warn of a missile attack, and has provided security for the western borders of the Soviet Union. The station started operating at full capacity in 1971. After the withdrawal of Russian troops from Latvia, the constant complaints of local residents about strong electromagnetic radiation from the station led to the fact that on April 30, 1994, Latvia and Russia signed an agreement to dismantle the radar. The unfinished building of the new locator in May 1995 was blown up. The dismantling of the station began on September 1, 1998, the day after the cessation of its operation. The territory of the station was transferred to the council of self-government of the Ransky volost of the Kuldigsky district. Russia for free renounced the right to own a town with ten residential buildings for 540 apartments, a hotel, a hospital, a kindergarten, two clubs, a bathhouse and other facilities.
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. +1
      14 July 2016 11: 49
      Quote: Roman1970
      Did you feel "freedom"?

      Rather, they were overly optimistic. but...
  4. +1
    14 July 2016 11: 46
    Thanks to "Mr. Gorby," how many of these towns have we left, not only on the territory of the former Soviet Union and in Eastern Europe, and have given everything away for nothing?
  5. -1
    14 July 2016 11: 46
    Quote: Roman1970
    Yes ... How many of them are left here, abandoned, on the territory of the former Union ...

    Or maybe it’s worthwhile to demand payment for the construction and use of property of the USSR. It will be funny to look at the reaction of the Baltic states.
  6. 0
    14 July 2016 11: 47
    I look, someone there this Latvian Pripyat contains: mows the grass, the whole window still ... A ghost town.
  7. +1
    14 July 2016 11: 47
    A year ago, the object became the property of self-government, ”the resource writes.

    Local authorities are trying to easily cut some money from overseas and European "friends".
  8. +2
    14 July 2016 11: 48
    Let them put it in order, repair it: then it will come in handy to the rightful owners.
    1. 0
      14 July 2016 11: 56
      Do you think that you can, like the Kyrgyz, then expose from there? No, the idea is good, but will it work?
  9. +2
    14 July 2016 11: 57
    Pugacheva with his inner circle goes to Latvia to sing songs
  10. 0
    14 July 2016 12: 07
    Is there no overcoat of Sashnaya where? Let everyone, from the new arrivals, dress her and pull herself up ten times on the crossbar, otherwise they will not accept their town, there the oath is imposed by some kind of Tuvan shaman, such as diarrhea and enuresis of the everlasting, huh ... wassat
  11. -1
    14 July 2016 12: 14
    Nda, as I understand it, there are a huge number of such towns (military and not so) in the vastness of the former Soviet Union (and in the Russian Federation as well), and most are abandoned. What is there to want from Latvia? Why is this town necessary for a limiter of this scale? So they use it as they can. To be honest, I don't see anything strange. Another thing is that enemies will improve their skills, this is unpleasant. Limitrofov will need to return "home" as soon as possible. I'll make a reservation right away, the Balts have good friends and I can't say anything bad about these peoples. We must return ... USSR v.2.0 ...
  12. +10
    14 July 2016 12: 16
    Something like this ....
  13. bad
    0
    14 July 2016 12: 21
    Latvian Defense Ministry proposed to adapt the former Soviet military town under the NATO range
    ..nothing we didn’t build ourselves .. so it’s better to finish off what the "occupiers" were building .. what to say .. nothing .. or rather there is something but obscene ..
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. 0
    14 July 2016 12: 33
    Yes, of course, my heart is sweating when I look at these abandoned military camps. BUT!!! This forced us to create new systems that do not make us dependent on others, on the Baltic states, averaged Asia, and others.
    In Soviet times, I had to visit Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, the Baltic states, and Moldova. I always knew how to behave with sellers, taxi drivers, bus and truck drivers, cops. 95% as throughout the country, 5% - features of local flavor. Now I do not know)
  16. Sly
    0
    14 July 2016 13: 14
    teeth grind already - we built the union, and now there NATA will sit ...
  17. +2
    14 July 2016 13: 19
    I was in Liepaja. Just near the port. There are old Soviet five-story buildings. Many Russians. We talked with the locals. The mood is dull. They say that here we are not needed and Russia is not needed ....
    Our embassies are a sinecure for thieves, and not the center of Russian influence in foreign countries. Shameful failure of pensioner Zurabov in Ukraine. Slurred actions in the Baltic states. ..a lot of where.
    1. 0
      14 July 2016 21: 01
      +. Believe me, these "Lavrovsky Falcons" (with all due respect to Lavrov himself) do not work better in Central Asia either. Apart from loud words about international friendship (the same words each time), nothing is done. And they behave ugly.
  18. +1
    14 July 2016 13: 30
    Such economic Balts, "you will envy".
  19. 0
    14 July 2016 16: 01
    Adazhi is not enough for them .... (Adazhi in Soviet times, a complex of "training" and a large land range, now used in NATO). From Riga is located 20 km.
    Apparently, the labuses at the former Soviet military facilities decided to earn at least something.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"