Military Review

Assad: the attacks of the Western coalition in Syria are useless, a change in the war occurred only thanks to Russia

45
It was Russia that helped turn the tide of the armed conflict in Syria, TASS Statement by the President of the Republic of Bashar Assad.


Assad: the attacks of the Western coalition in Syria are useless, a change in the war occurred only thanks to Russia


When asked by NBC channel correspondent Bill Neely, "what or who influenced the course of the war in Syria," Assad answered without hesitation: "Russia."

The president also expressed confidence that Moscow “cannot make a separate deal” with the West in order to remove him from power.

"Syrian President Bashar Assad said that he believes in the absence of a deal with Russia to remove him from power," said Nili.

The editors of the channel stressed that "the interview was recorded by the press service of the President of Syria and was not edited."

According to the president of the SAR, the strikes inflicted by the Western coalition do not contribute to the victory over extremists.

"Syrian President Assad said that the US bombing of his country is illegal, frivolous and counterproductive," said Neely. The Syrian leader is confident that "the war in Syria can be won in a few months."

At the same time, Assad noted that “Obama does not have enough will to defeat the Islamic State terrorist group”.

He also drew attention to the fact that neither Obama nor his predecessors had any foreign policy experience before the election. “None of them had any experience. This is a problem for the United States. Having a person without the slightest foreign policy experience in the White House is dangerous for the country as a whole, ”said the Syrian President.
Photos used:
Alexey Druzhinin / Presidential Press Service / TASS
45 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey K
    Andrey K 14 July 2016 09: 45
    +11
    Assad: the attacks of the Western coalition in Syria are useless, a change in the war occurred only thanks to Russia

    NBC Correspondent Bill Neely "Room Out" ...
    These words of Assad will not reach the western man in the street.
    Assad's opinion may shake Barak Huseynovich's "exceptionalism" negative
    "Syrian President Assad said that the US bombing of his country is illegal, frivolous and counterproductive."

    The words of the legally elected president, the coalition of "carriers of democracy", tries not to notice request
    After all, these are not only the words of Assad, but also the lack of legitimacy of their actions from the point of view of the UN Security Council. The bombing and "implantation of democracy" are carried out contrary to international law negative
    1. Kent0001
      Kent0001 14 July 2016 10: 00
      +12
      Only Barak Huseynovich himself believes in the exclusivity of Barak Huseynovich, and nobody else.
      1. Nicholas C.
        Nicholas C. 14 July 2016 10: 16
        +9
        Moderate and immoderate terrorists in Aleppo fell into the cauldron.
        Today Kerry is arriving to "coordinate actions", negotiate a truce, cease fire.

        The feeling of déjà vu, somewhere this already happened.
        1. Kent0001
          Kent0001 14 July 2016 10: 19
          +5
          While Kerry flies, they must be worked out in the boiler to the fullest.
          1. cniza
            cniza 14 July 2016 10: 23
            +4
            When asked by NBC channel correspondent Bill Neely, "what or who influenced the course of the war in Syria," Assad answered without hesitation: "Russia."


            But this episode was not shown, they said it would be shown later, maybe.
          2. DMB_95
            DMB_95 14 July 2016 10: 32
            +1
            Quote: Kent0001
            While Kerry flies, they must be worked out in the boiler to the fullest.

            It is necessary to "send" Kerry in full. And to work off - not while Kerry is flying, but in principle.
    2. kostiknet
      kostiknet 14 July 2016 10: 03
      +2
      Quote: Andrey K
      These words of Assad will not reach the western man in the street.

      Of course they won't! After all, it is America that is waging the "last and decisive battle" against terrorism, while Russia with its aerospace forces is flickering on the periphery and getting underfoot prevents Nobel Abama from overthrowing the tyrant Assad in the process! This is the only way in which Russian participation in this operation is served in the west ... And if an ordinary (and not only) American can easily believe in a zombie in Manhattan, he cannot believe that the US Air Force inflicts negligible damage by definition. This option is not available to their mind ... lol
      1. 5 column
        5 column 14 July 2016 10: 14
        -5
        Quote: kostiknet
        This is the only way they serve in the West Russian participation in this operation ...

        In the West, they all lie constantly, why listen to them! It’s because they claimed that

        Khmeimim: All (American) Russian Attack Helicopters Returned to Airfields

        и
        Defense Ministry: (America) Russia does not use cluster munitions in Syria
        1. 33 Watcher
          33 Watcher 14 July 2016 11: 37
          +2
          Quote: 5 column
          Khmeimim: All (American) Russian Attack Helicopters Returned to Airfields

          And what is wrong?
          Quote: 5 column
          Defense Ministry: (America) Russia does not use cluster munitions in Syria

          Literally: Prohibited ammunition.
          So what, wrong? laughing
          1. 5 column
            5 column 14 July 2016 11: 52
            -2
            Quote: Observer 33
            Quote: 5 column
            Khmeimim: All (American) Russian Attack Helicopters Returned to Airfields

            And what is wrong?

            Is everyone back?

            Quote: Observer 33

            Quote: 5 column
            Defense Ministry: (America) Russia does not use cluster munitions in Syria

            Literally: Prohibited ammunition.
            So what, wrong? laughing
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. midivan
        midivan 14 July 2016 10: 36
        +1
        Quote: kostiknet
        Of course they won't! After all, it is America that is fighting "the last and decisive battle" against terrorism.

        Well, I don’t know how it was before the layman, but on the Veteran (http://www.veteranstoday.com/) I’ve read the opposite time and not only the articles but also the comments and the conclusion, but they’re not as distant as we usually think. wink
    3. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 14 July 2016 10: 14
      +4
      Assad: the attacks of the Western coalition in Syria are useless, a change in the war occurred only thanks to Russia
      "turning point" is not visible, some kind of trench war is going on, the "truce" stopped the "turning point", worse than not, stop the advancing army.
    4. Altona
      Altona 14 July 2016 11: 15
      -1
      Quote: Andrey K
      The words of the legally elected president, the coalition of "carriers of democracy", are trying to ignore the request
      After all, these are not only the words of Assad, but also the lack of legitimacy of their actions from the point of view of the UN Security Council. The bombing and "implantation of democracy" are carried out contrary to international law

      ----------------------
      The supply of weapons to any bearded uncle who is supposedly an "armed opposition" is also contrary to international law. This is the financing of terrorism. And why, after the "strikes" of the American coalition, the bearded men have more and more advanced weapons systems, albeit in a simplified form. ATGM "Kornet" and TOU, MANPADS "Strela" and "Stinger", artillery pieces. Some strange "blows". request
      1. Andrey K
        Andrey K 14 July 2016 11: 25
        +5
        Quote: Altona
        Some strange "blows". request

        The mistake of "exceptional" pilots, they did not "take into account" the correction for the wind - and that "accidentally" falls into the wrong negative
        1. kodxnumx
          kodxnumx 14 July 2016 12: 26
          +1
          Assad knows what he’s saying, I’m sure that he will not wake him up to please the USA, we are not the same people!
  2. DIVAN SOLDIER
    DIVAN SOLDIER 14 July 2016 09: 45
    +2
    In these intrigues the devil will break a leg: Syria, Donbas, Putin leaked, Putin did well, our Crimea, Donbas leaked, enemies with Turkey, partners with Turkey. How to interpret our policy in general ???
    1. jjj
      jjj 14 July 2016 09: 49
      +1
      This is world politics. And the one who doesn’t break his leg is on his horse
    2. Bramb
      Bramb 14 July 2016 09: 50
      -4
      Without labels that you and others have hung.
      Shortcut - it is simple and allows you to understand the situation clearly and almost always erroneously. But the shortcut will not allow you to understand the situation as it really is!
      Therefore: first drop the labels if you really want to understand something.
    3. Lord of the Sith
      Lord of the Sith 14 July 2016 09: 59
      +8
      What buoys did Donbass merge from, when and in whose wet dreams? wassat
      1. Krasniy_lis
        Krasniy_lis 14 July 2016 11: 25
        +1
        Quote: Sith Lord
        What buoys

        No need to say. We got it. I’m already talking about 3! the DNR drain is rubbed. Say "new roadmap", "Pushilin leaked". You might think Pushilin is something other than a mouthpiece (what they say is what they say). Everything has already been decided without the Russian Federation, the peacekeepers from NATO. With what fright NATO can send peacekeepers anywhere, if it is the prerogative of the UN and only them.
        Oh right Lavrov ...
    4. Shuttle
      Shuttle 14 July 2016 10: 08
      +1
      Quote: DIVAN SOLDIER
      In these intrigues the devil will break a leg: Syria, Donbas, Putin leaked, Putin did well, our Crimea, Donbas leaked, enemies with Turkey, partners with Turkey. How to interpret our policy in general ???

      Quietly and calmly interpret. By the fruits. The fruits are still green, but one thing is clear - we have what to do in our country, there is what and why. These are the fruits of foreign policy. And it could be that someone else besides us would have what to do in our country, what would be done and why. Just another question - would this country be ours in this case?
      For example, in Syria, Syrians are not always able to do what they really need in their territory. In Ukraine, by the way, already too. And we are talking here in a wide, t.s. national sense. And if in Syria, in spite of all the enormous horror and the scale of bloodshed, there is at least a plan on how to fix everything, in Ukraine (not about Donbass here) it seems that there is no such plan.
    5. g1v2
      g1v2 14 July 2016 13: 20
      0
      Normal imperial politics - there are no friends and no enemies, but there are only interests. Questions are not resolved on a good-bad basis, but is beneficial for Russia or not profitable. Now one thing may be profitable, and tomorrow another. request I really do not advise taking on faith what is said in the box - it says what you need to know for utilitarian purposes. There was a danger of a large-scale war on dill - propaganda explains to the layman why we can fight with Kiev, the danger died down - the pumping died down. We have been balancing with Turkey for several months on the verge of a full-scale war - propaganda explained who Erdogan is and why we can start to fight with him. They bounced from the war - the intensity of infopumps died down. This is normal. yes
      On the whole, personally, in my opinion, our policy is quite competent and for the time being justifies itself - we will obviously come out of this large-scale confrontation much more than we entered into it. As in principle, and in the 40s, we emerged from that war much stronger than when we entered it. hi
  3. Smoked
    Smoked 14 July 2016 09: 46
    +3
    Of course, a turning point occurred, but I don’t understand why the militants still control part of Damascus?
    1. Leto
      Leto 14 July 2016 09: 50
      -3
      Quote: Smoked
      but I don’t understand why the militants still control part of Damascus?

      Ask Assad. He announced a fracture ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. Retvizan 8
    Retvizan 8 14 July 2016 09: 53
    +2
    The fight against ISIS was just a beautiful screen, behind which the United States, Turkey and similar countries piled up in the region and turned their dirty tricks on controlling the region, pumping out resources, etc.
  5. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 14 July 2016 09: 56
    +2
    Quote: Smoked
    so I don’t understand why the militants still control part of Damascus?

    There is no need to talk about complete control, and no one hides the presence of the terrorists themselves. I believe that the security forces are working in this direction, but this is the East with its own mess, and even with the seasoning from "friends", if they were wrong.
    1. ver_
      ver_ 14 July 2016 15: 30
      0
      From the Arabs, soldiers — something from a shit bullet ... They shoot just to shoot — they shot in the white light, like a pretty penny, if you please pay all the ammunition spent ... like in Egypt in 1973 ..
  6. Evil 55
    Evil 55 14 July 2016 09: 57
    +11
    This is how flies teach OBAMO of foreign policy activity ..
  7. PValery53
    PValery53 14 July 2016 10: 13
    +3
    If B. Assad, with the help of the Russian Aerospace Forces, succeeds in cleansing the territory of Syria from all kinds of militants (and competitors), without liberalism, then the balance and peace in Syria will come more clearly.
  8. aszzz888
    aszzz888 14 July 2016 10: 21
    +5
    Well done, B. Assad. I drove around the frame and the merikatos, like a tank!
  9. gg.na
    gg.na 14 July 2016 10: 30
    +2
    At the same time, Assad noted that “Obama does not have enough will to defeat the Islamic State terrorist group”.

    He also drew attention to the fact that neither Obama nor his predecessors had any foreign policy experience before the election. “None of them had any experience. This is a problem for the United States. Having a person without the slightest foreign policy experience in the White House is dangerous for the country as a whole, ”said the Syrian President.

    good Strongly said! Well done! good so them negative these squashes and other scales !!! lol
  10. iskander491
    iskander491 14 July 2016 10: 31
    +3
    Quote: PValery53
    If B. Assad, with the help of the Russian Aerospace Forces, succeeds in cleansing the territory of Syria from all kinds of militants (and competitors), without liberalism, then the balance and peace in Syria will come more clearly.


    Syria will win, there will be a new war elsewhere. The whole West needs war in order to nullify its obligations and earn money. Oil control and instability in the region, nothing more.

    As they said in the news, our helicopter pilots died on a downed Syrian helicopter. So how many ours are now fighting the issue of state secrets and the fact that after that Syria will win is no longer a question, but a fact.

    And oil will be ours and the region under control.
  11. Air Force Colonel
    Air Force Colonel 14 July 2016 10: 35
    +3
    Good luck to you and your people a courageous and courageous person.
  12. atamankko
    atamankko 14 July 2016 10: 38
    0
    The Syrian President knows his true friends.
  13. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 14 July 2016 10: 38
    -1
    There is simply nothing to add in the words of B. Assad ...
  14. evil partisan
    evil partisan 14 July 2016 10: 39
    +1
    [hide] [/ hide] It seems to me that Assad is stupidly lacking soldiers for the final victory. He could have a big deal with Eun so that he would throw a thousand 200 of his scumbags. He already has nothing to lose anyway, and here you look at the victory over ISIS, the sanctions will be lifted ...
    1. midivan
      midivan 14 July 2016 10: 48
      +4
      Quote: Angry Guerrilla
      It seems to me that for the final victory, Assad is stupidly lacking soldiers. He could have a big deal with Eun so that he would throw a thousand 200 of his scumbags.

      Can I rub it with Jingping? a couple of millions will definitely solve the problem and it is beneficial for them (overpopulation) wassat
      Quote: Angry Guerrilla
      and here you look at the victory over ISIS, the sanctions will be lifted ...

      Well, it doesn’t seem to fit into the concept of the State Department crying
  15. silver_roman
    silver_roman 14 July 2016 10: 47
    -3
    At the same time, Assad noted that "Obama does not have enough will to defeat the Islamic State terrorist group."

    Why is Assad lying? what the hell will the obama?
    1) Obama does not solve anything. it's just a piece of meat.
    2) even if he decided, then the will has nothing to do with it. which will bomb its own child? Assad understands this perfectly. why tell a lie?
  16. newterra
    newterra 14 July 2016 11: 06
    -1
    Russia is always right
  17. sailor52
    sailor52 14 July 2016 11: 20
    +2
    It may very well be that during the presidential elections in the United States (when the Americans traditionally ask the world to "pause" until they have a change of elites and they, with new enthusiasts, begin to bend the whole world for themselves), events in the Middle East theater will not favor the Anglo -Saxons.
    Ideally, they can be thrown out from there altogether.
    Obama is already afraid to decide something and to implement these decisions, too little left on his post.
    That mumbles about the ban on testing nuclear weapons, about the START-3.
    And our "Kuznetsov" goes there to the BS to the shores of Syria in October-January not in vain. Probably, he (and our entire squadron in the region) will not be assigned the main role in the upcoming performance, but he will have some task (in addition to training the crews of the new regiment on the MiG-29 in conditions as close as possible to combat) and tests new technology MiG-29, Ka-52 ...)
  18. chaldon
    chaldon 14 July 2016 11: 30
    0
    As long as Russia and the West are connected by threads of oil and gas pipelines, there will be no "hot" war with NATO. In Syria, the US by the hands of ISIS and the so-called. The "moderate opposition" is trying to overthrow Assad in order to build oil and gas pipelines from Qatar, the United Arab Emirates to Turkey and further to Europe through Syria. If this task is solved, then Russia can be "unfastened" from the supply of hydrocarbons to the West and ... bombed, having previously tied Russia's hands with the START-3 treaty. That we reduce the number of our carriers of nuclear weapons to a level where the American missile defense system can effectively intercept them. So there is no talk of any "democracy".
    1. You Vlad
      You Vlad 14 July 2016 21: 18
      -1
      The United States is only interested in the problems of the United States! The problems of Europe do not concern them! The Saudis think in vain that everything is done in their interests, in the event of the fall of Syria they will be next! I do not believe in democracy, I believe in the right of the strong!
  19. sharp-lad
    sharp-lad 14 July 2016 15: 26
    +1
    Who would doubt the "pure" intentions of the "exceptional" Caudla!
    1. You Vlad
      You Vlad 14 July 2016 21: 39
      0
      The true reason why we did not please the west is that we occupy the most stable piece of the planet earth stuffed with natural resources! Plus to you for pure intentions!
  20. You Vlad
    You Vlad 14 July 2016 21: 00
    0
    Ha Ha how beautiful he is Obama kicked under his breath lol