Republic of Korea and the United States have agreed to deploy missile defense system

The American high-tech system THAAD will soon be deployed in South Korea to intercept the DPRK’s ballistic missiles, reports RIA News message agency "Renhap."

"South Korea and the United States made a joint decision to deploy the THAAD system as part of defensive actions to ensure the security of the Republic of Korea and our people from the North Korean nuclear weapons, weapons of mass destruction and threats of ballistic missiles. South Korea and the United States are working closely to host the THAAD system as quickly as possible, ”

cites the agency text of the message of the Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

“The new missile defense system is aimed specifically at North Korea’s missiles,” the release says.

According to the agency, the system will be fully deployed until the end of 2017. Currently, its locations are being specified.

As previously reported, the 3 district is considered for basement: “Chilgok county, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Ymson county, Chuncheon-Pukto and Pyeongtaek Gyeonggi-do”

The total number of complexes planned for placement is not yet called.

Help Agency: “The cost of one complex will be about one and a half trillion South Korean won (1,25 billion dollars). The THAAD battery will consist of TPY-2 TM anti-missile radar, six launchers, 48 interceptor missiles, as well as a control panel and an electric generator. ”

Comments

[Mikhail Krapivin]

"The new missile defense system is aimed specifically at North Korean missiles," the release emphasizes.

In fact, North Korea is betting on long-range artillery, promising to raze Seoul to the ground in ten minutes from howitzers. Or do we already have missile defense intercepts howitzer shells? So left excuse. In general - there are more of our submarines on duty on the ground off the coast of the United States - and let them build their missile defense on health, it will help them a lot ..

[Coconut]

Our submarines have long been there and the mattresses know about this and are fighting with the wrong hands .. type if we are not within

[Starover_Z]

“The new missile defense system is aimed specifically at North Korean missiles”

Well, well ... SAMSUNG is asking for sanctions ?!
If Russia abandons the industrial products of South Korea, then who will have fun ?!
The Russians understand that much will disappear from the stores, but Korea will think more fun ...
(I ask you not to kick much)

[Hon]

Quote: Starover_Z

Well, well ... SAMSUNG is asking for sanctions ?!
If Russia abandons the industrial products of South Korea, then who will have fun ?!
The Russians understand that much will disappear from the stores, but Korea will think more fun ...
(I ask you not to kick much)

Most smartphones have something from Samsung, amoled displays, memory, processors, cameras. close the smartphone market in Russia?

[Lord of the Sith]

Quote: Mikhail Krapivin

"The new missile defense system is aimed specifically at North Korean missiles," the release emphasizes.

In fact, North Korea is betting on long-range artillery, promising to raze Seoul to the ground in ten minutes from howitzers. Or do we already have missile defense intercepts howitzer shells? So left excuse. In general - there are more of our submarines on duty on the ground off the coast of the United States - and let them build their missile defense on health, it will help them a lot ..

That's right, North Korea has 4500 barrel artillery at a distance of 15 km from the center of Seoul.

[Leto]

Quote: Sith Lord

That's right, North Korea has 4500 barrel artillery at a distance of 15 km from the center of Seoul.

Damocles sword in the Korean version. On the other hand, the RK has its own trunks, too, they will not allow Seoul to be completely destroyed.

[Leto]

Quote: Mikhail Krapivin

In fact, North Korea is betting on long-range artillery, promising to raze Seoul to the ground in ten minutes from howitzers. Or do we already have missile defense intercepts howitzer shells? So left excuse

Seoul is not all of RK; its destruction will not lead to surrender.

[aszzz888]

And who would doubt that the merikatos would shove their racket into the southerners!
We must also prepare (if not already prepared) our countermeasures.

[Hon]

thank you chubby, gave an excuse.

[KOH]

Still others want to turn into a "running boar" ... ))))))

[knn54]

So before the resuscitation of SEATO is not far ...

[Corsair0304]

Something briskly, the Yankees began to vparivayut their THAADs. Yesterday they did the same with Israel ... Can anyone tell us about the effectiveness of these complexes?
And something else tells me that North Korea will not use missiles against a country that is in the artillery range, but proto stupidly crush manpower and tanks.

[Dan4eG]

Yesterday with Israel they did the same thing

They did not sell Israel, we have a Hetz!
https://topwar.ru/97714-smi-izrail-i-ssha-proveli-uspeshnye-ispytaniya-vzaimodey
stviyu-sistem-pro-dvuh-stran.html # comment-id-6042946

[vadimtt]

"" The new missile defense system is aimed specifically at North Korean missiles, "the release says. - not childishly scorched

[japs]

Interestingly, what "kickbacks" from the mattress military-industrial complex of the South Korean Serdyukovs? Or from a "pure heart"?
It is clear the stump that all this fits into the general strategy of Pindo-Stan.

[Million]

Another signed a deferred sentence ...

[Berg berg]

Put in the DPRK Russian air defense, S-300 and Shell-S leasing with a return! And to be led by LI-SI-Tsyny!

[berezin1987]

And what will the DPRK pay? If necessary, we can agree on the deployment of our complexes on their territory, which will protect us and them. We have good relations with South Korea and we are interested in maintaining them.

[Hon]

the Chinese have ceased to be friends with them, the chubby one simply plays along with the USA

[Hon]

better to star on them with something heavy. have already arrived

[Victor1]

This step is aimed more at pressure on China, although for us there is also little positive, but we have just the answer.
But let the whale * yezy get scolded, otherwise they are used to sit aside and act quietly.

[berezin1987]

So it is necessary to withdraw from the INF Treaty. Quarters gliders deploy missile defense at our borders around the perimeter. We need missiles of the Chinese df-15b type to combat radio-contrast surface targets such as aircraft carriers and destroyers with missile defense. This will allow in case of war to destroy missile defense facilities and will allow our missiles to achieve goals in the United States.

[Cat man null]

Quote: berezin1987

So it is necessary to withdraw from the INF Treaty

- it's time to include the answer to the question "is it profitable for the Russian Federation to leave the RIAC" in the FAQ

Quote: Old26

Quote: Bakht

According to the letter of the Treaty, the Russian Federation has the right to withdraw from it unilaterally. Since so many copies break around this question, it means that I am not the only one who assumes its harmfulness. I see only the environment of the Russian Federation with missile defense systems and an offensive weapon system that can quickly reach the country's territory.

But as many copies break for NO EXIT from the contract.
Russia's environment with missile defense systems - it is more a product of the targeted, everyday impact of our propaganda.

"Surrounding" us with ABM bases looks like this.

• ONE missile defense base in Romania (readiness level - early 2016), oriented by the central radar to the southeast towards Turkey, Iran (general viewing area - 240 degrees) with 24 missile defense systems. The range of the radar is up to 1000-1500 km.
• A couple of ships in the Mediterranean Sea (with the periodic entry of one of them into the World Cup).
• The TAAAD system in Turkey, the radar in Turkey (and possibly in Israel), focused on Iran.

And that’s all. The remaining ships are in the Atlantic and the Pacific Ocean, and by no means close to our shores. Outage и VPR located in the United States. When will be in Poland - is unknown. And whether it will be. What is the environment of missile defense systems? What about offensive weapons? Has something changed in the last quarter century?

Quote: Bakht

These are the problems of Russia and Russians. If you consider the Agreement to be beneficial - take the trouble to comply with all of its clauses. Consider unprofitable - it's time to get out of it.

And we observe it. AND the exit is not profitable for us now. The re-equipment of the Strategic Missile Forces and the NSNF is underway, and it is technically impossible to "hang up" the production of several hundred MRBMs. And we will disrupt the rearmament of the Strategic Missile Forces / NSNF, and we will receive the MRBM in the required quantity in 10-15 years

- here - a rather voluminous discussion of this issue. Highly recommend reading (discussion specifically)

 The origins and realities of the INF Treaty

https://topwar.ru/82804-istoki-i-realii-dogovora-po-rsmd.html

[colonel manuch]

Well am am! They are driven at the door, and they climb out the window. I want to round Russia in a circle like them.

[Cosmonaut]

Quote: Coco

Our submarines have long been there and the mattresses know about this and are fighting with the wrong hands .. type if we are not within

It's simple - despite the tensions in Europe and the Mediterranean, the states are safe in Asia!
They need a Big Provocation !!! I hope no one will argue that "THEIR" democracy is sticking out everywhere !!!