Military Review

OPK began mass production of "electronic brain" for technology

61
United Instrument Engineering Corporation launched into mass production a powerful 32-bit microcontroller for controlling various devices. The microcircuit can become a “brain” for Russian cars, electric transport, ships and robotic complexes, reports press office enterprises.

OPK began mass production of "electronic brain" for technology


“The product is equipped with digital signal processor functions and Motor Control function, which allows coordination of the engine, electrical transmission, generator and communication channels. In real-time, the microcontroller processes digital information and issues the necessary commands to individual units for the proper functioning of the entire technical complex, ”the release says.

Deputy Director General of the defense industry, Andrei Chendarov:
“The development was carried out by specialists of our Voronezh Scientific-Research Institute of Electronic Technology. The microcontroller is essentially the "brain center" of all modern machines. For example, in robotic complexes, the microcontroller will be responsible for the interaction of the engine and navigation systems, in automotive engineering, for the correct operation of all electronics, from lighting devices to the on-board computer. The chip also makes it possible to ensure the interaction of dissimilar technical devices, both controlled by man and fully automated. ”


General Director of the Research Institute of Electronic Technology Dmitry Kozhanov:
“The controller has a performance of up to 125 MIPS, which corresponds to the level of the most modern foreign models and significantly exceeds most domestic analogues. In the near future, we plan to reach the level of production up to 100 thousands of such products per year. ”


The press service added that "the microcontroller is planned to be used in the fields of electric motor and electric vehicle transmission equipment management, in promising systems of electric propulsion of ships, main and city electric transport, in machine-tool construction, robotics and medicine."
Photos used:
United Instrument Corporation
61 comment
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. vit
    vit 7 July 2016 16: 51
    +14
    20 years earlier
    1. just exp
      just exp 7 July 2016 16: 59
      +35
      better late than never .
      we are bad with electronics and therefore any improvement is like a balm for the soul
      1. PKK
        PKK 8 July 2016 05: 11
        -5
        Russian microcontrollers, the largest microcontrollers in the world!
    2. Khariton
      Khariton 7 July 2016 17: 00
      +7
      Well, here it is "bast" Russia! We all know how ... But in time to patent and implement massively (with advertising, etc.) Here we have eternal problems! Well done all the same ...
      1. bubalik
        bubalik 7 July 2016 18: 01
        +1
        Cat man null
        give a better assessment of this article
        1. Khariton
          Khariton 7 July 2016 18: 06
          -4
          Quote: bubalik
          Cat man null
          give a better assessment of this article

          This cat will say shit and leave ...))) bully You're right..! (wait for the cons)))))
          1. bubalik
            bubalik 7 July 2016 18: 10
            +1
            Khariton (3) RU  Today, 18: 06 ↑
            ,,, he has a special relationship with this, belay ,,, and you to me Mihana remind lol
            1. Khariton
              Khariton 7 July 2016 18: 24
              +3
              Quote: bubalik
              Khariton (3) RU  Today, 18: 06 ↑
              ,,, he has a special relationship with this, belay ,,, and you to me Mihana remind lol

              Mikhan is here, I understand many remember, especially liberalists ..)))))
              And at the expense of the "specialist" they (the company and K)))) will trivialize everything now, as if we are "stupid" in Russia and we'd better sell oil and gas and shut up .. I'm a specialist myself and I'm sick of all these imported technologies ( they are all geared towards collecting information ..) You muffle and muffle them, and they again climb into the system under a new "sauce" .. Sometimes you want to rip out the motherboard and smash it to hell with a sledgehammer ... am
              1. japs
                japs 7 July 2016 18: 52
                +10
                [quote = Khariton] [quote = bubalik] [quote] Khariton (3) RU  Today, ... Sometimes you want to tear out the motherboard and smash it with a sledgehammer to hell ... am[/ Quote]

                I agree to all 100%! From a PC from DOS to 086 percent, then Windows in ascending order to 8.1 pro.
                I'm sick to hell. I switched to Ubuntu Backbox at work and at home in half with castrated by most I do not want Windows 8.1 pro.
                It helped. Slightly let go.
                And the Windows 10s were only enough for 1 day, brought to Ben Fene!
                1. Khariton
                  Khariton 7 July 2016 19: 03
                  +3
                  [quote = japs] [quote = Khariton] [quote = bubalik] [quote] Khariton (3) RU  Today, ... Sometimes I want to tear out the motherboard and smash it to hell with a sledgehammer ... am[/ Quote]

                  I agree to all 100%! From a PC from DOS to 086 percent, then Windows in ascending order to 8.1 pro.
                  I'm sick to hell. He switched to Ubuntu Backbox.
                  It helped. [/ Quote]
                  Yes, DOS 5.0, etc. ...)))) Russia needs to switch to its platforms in information technology, otherwise we will not survive .. (I mean state institutions and especially the military-industrial complex) .. They steal everything! Israeli comrades are constantly there beg here .. Well tell me how and what and where? ))) bully
          2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. alexng
        alexng 7 July 2016 21: 36
        +6
        Quote: Chariton
        We all know how .... But in time to patent and implement massively (with advertising, etc.) Here we have eternal problems! Well done, though ...


        In Russia, the development of controllers was always carried out, but there was no mass use, since under the traitor Yeltsin, domestic automation and control systems systematically spread rot, although development was carried out (personally took part in a forced manner) due to the lack of even foreign ready-made samples, and those that were offered by the West at exorbitant prices did not meet the demands and were of limited use due to their primitiveness. It was only later that universal controllers appeared abroad, but similar ones were also produced in our country, their "analogs" (Albatross, DeKont, etc.) are being produced and improved with a completely different system of internal commands from the bourgeois system. And for the defense industry complex, special requirements for such devices and the fact that new controllers with such performance and very high resistance to external influences have appeared is a great success. By the way, the Americans on their shuttles used not their own, but the Japanese OMRON SysMac controllers (excellent at 100%). I do not recognize Siemens controllers of the "Symatic" type at all (expensive junk not adapted to our power system with a dead-grounded neutral). When meeting with representatives from manufacturers, symatic personally warned them that they would lose the Russian market because of this. For specialists, do not confuse household systems with industrial and military-space systems.
        1. bubalik
          bubalik 7 July 2016 21: 42
          +1
          alexneg (1) RU  Today, 21: 36 ↑
          ,,, also made a special declaration (do not be offended) ,, thanks for the detailed answer to the article hi
          1. alexng
            alexng 7 July 2016 22: 46
            +3
            This is my profession and my bread, and now I am engaged in the creation of existing control systems using industrial controllers.
            And now: a little off topic, but for professional "drains", like salt on a wound
            http://vtbrussia.ru/tech/istrebitel-t-50-vzglyad-iznutri/?utm_source=yandex&utm_

            medium = cpc & utm_campaign = Tehnologii_TOP100_RSJa & _openstat = ZGlyZWN0LnlhbmRleC5ydTs

            xMDMxMjI3NjsxNDYyOTE4MjI4O29rLnJ1Omd1YXJhbnRlZQ&yclid=3846194846651908578
            1. Amurets
              Amurets 8 July 2016 00: 32
              0
              Quote: alexneg
              //vtbrussia.ru/tech/istrebitel-t-50-vzglyad-iznutri/?utm_source=yandex&utm_

              medium = cpc & utm_campaign = Tehnologii_TOP100_RSJa & _openstat = ZGlyZWN0LnlhbmRleC5ydTs


              xMDMxMjI3NjsxNDYyOTE4MjI4O29rLnJ1Omd1YXJhbnRlZQ&yclid=3846194846651908578

              So what? Just a link to the article.
              1. alexng
                alexng 8 July 2016 15: 09
                0
                Have you tried to read this article?
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Orionvit
          Orionvit 7 July 2016 22: 45
          +9
          For specialists, do not confuse household systems with industrial and military-space systems.
          The fact of the matter is that the layman judge about the development of electronics, only by home computers and other fashionable devices, such as smartphones. The fact that the Soviet Union lagged behind the West in the development of electronics, especially in the 80s. years, to put it mildly, not true. I still had to work at the defense radio-electronic enterprises under the Union, moreover, in my specialty (design and technology of radio-electronic means). The whole problem of the Soviet system, in fact, consisted in the fact that all the best are only in defense, and the needs of citizens are based on a residual principle. If in the west, where the basis of society is profit, then most of the developments were immediately introduced to the market. Unlike the USSR, where everything new was immediately secreted, and was introduced exclusively only for military purposes. Here is the answer to why Russian weapons are considered the best in the world, because the potential was laid even then. True and a great country sold for jeans, cassette recorders and Coca-Cola.
          1. Amurets
            Amurets 8 July 2016 00: 59
            +4
            Quote: Orionvit
            The whole problem of the Soviet system, in fact, consisted in the fact that all the best are only in defense, and the needs of citizens are based on a residual principle. If in the west, where the basis of society is profit, then most of the developments were immediately introduced to the market. Unlike the USSR, where everything new was immediately secreted, and was introduced exclusively only for military purposes. Here is the answer to why Russian weapons are considered the best in the world, because the potential was laid even then.

            That’s the problem: the Americans began to implement the simplest ACAs in the automotive industry in the 60s, and everything was kept secret. At the automatic telephone exchanges we changed the emergency diesel power station with automatic switching on after the industrial network was turned off. So the civil automation unit occupied three cabinets, and the army three boards in a small cabinet. That's the difference. And when the imported agricultural machinery of the CPU came, headaches started here. Why am I writing this, because this controller will work not only in the electric drive, but everywhere the real-time systems work.
            1. aksakal
              aksakal 8 July 2016 18: 39
              +1
              Quote: Amurets
              And this is the point of the problem. The Americans began to introduce the simplest aces in the automotive industry in the 60s, and everything was kept secret.

              - This Soviet habit annoyed me too. Moreover, the most offensive, they were hiding from their own citizens, for the enemies-inos knew more than the Soviet citizen. They hid it, but they could make money on it! But I think those days have passed, conscientious mistakes have been taken into account and will not be repeated, and military developments after a successful implementation in the military sphere in a truncated version will be commercialized and improve the competitiveness of the domestic economy. In another way - alas, failure.
        4. The comment was deleted.
    3. Mestny
      Mestny 7 July 2016 20: 45
      -1
      What is 20 years old?
      “The controller has a capacity of up to 125 MIPS, which corresponds to the level of the most modern foreign models
  2. vadimtt
    vadimtt 7 July 2016 16: 52
    +5
    The fact that they launched their production is great!
    The fact that only 100000 products a year - get ready for sky-high price tags is bad.
    1. Maxom75
      Maxom75 7 July 2016 17: 21
      +2
      This is for now. But not far off unmanned KAMAZ and the Urals, both military and main (shuttle transport). So the volumes will increase and everything will become much cheaper. More worried about the lack of progress on unmanned trains, there is complete lull. (
      1. Palch
        Palch 7 July 2016 17: 57
        +5
        They say even to individual comrades, instead of molten brains, they will implant ...
        1. vadimtt
          vadimtt 8 July 2016 09: 03
          -1
          Looking every day at the behavior of some "drivers" on the road, all hands for! good
        2. Maxom75
          Maxom75 8 July 2016 13: 28
          +1
          Have you seen unmanned KAMAZ on tests? Since 2025 they are already planning to do up to 60% of the transportation in the country on shuttle drones on Russian roads.
      2. Vadim237
        Vadim237 7 July 2016 18: 00
        +3
        And also robotic agricultural machinery.
        1. Maxom75
          Maxom75 8 July 2016 13: 26
          0
          I already have a tractor, I saw it and even tried to put it on course. German electronics and programs so far.
      3. termite
        termite 7 July 2016 18: 43
        -2
        Ostap suffered
    2. i80186
      i80186 7 July 2016 19: 36
      +1
      Quote: vadimtt
      The fact that they launched their production is great!
      The fact that only 100000 products a year - get ready for sky-high price tags is bad.

      Have you heard about Analog Device BlackFin microcontrollers and their prices? It’s like from this series. smile
      1. vadimtt
        vadimtt 8 July 2016 09: 22
        0
        The price depends on the series and the type of execution. If the radiation-resistant class is SPACE, then the price tag for many will be simply fantastic. But such microcircuits are made in small batches (because there are not so many customers) and from this the price increases even more.
        If this AD BlackFin is so expensive - it means small series. Better look how much 8-bit PIC controllers cost - this is cheap mass drinks
    3. Rust0626
      Rust0626 7 July 2016 21: 28
      +1
      As I understand it, this is not about desktop processors. And such multitask controllers are crazy grandmas. As we bought a controller for an American machine, it cost almost 7 pieces in Baku.
      1. vadimtt
        vadimtt 8 July 2016 09: 25
        +1
        Industrial equipment is several times more expensive than the household that you wanted. It’s good that your machine doesn’t work in an aggressive production environment for isotope separation, there this controller would easily take the bar of 700 pieces of Bachinsky laughing
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 7 July 2016 16: 54
    +12
    Glad for NIIET. Worked once there. The crisis turned out to be deep. But, apparently, they got out, and put the right thing on the Russian market. I'll have to see.
    1. Verdun
      Verdun 7 July 2016 17: 15
      +9
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      I'll have to see.

      Do not forget when you look, tell, the right thing, or so - for show ...
  5. V.ic
    V.ic 7 July 2016 16: 56
    +5
    What did Armstrong supposedly say when he stepped on the surface of "?? the moon ??"? "This is one small step for people / corporations / but a giant leap for of all mankind ” / our industry /...
  6. LEVIAFAN
    LEVIAFAN 7 July 2016 17: 17
    +12
    Quote: V.ic
    What did Armstrong supposedly say when he stepped on the surface of "?? the moon ??"? "This is one small step for people / corporations / but a giant leap for of all mankind ” / our industry /...

    and then the director said: "Stop, filmed" and all the thump was gone.
    1. VOLCHOXURAL
      VOLCHOXURAL 7 July 2016 18: 43
      +1
      Quote: LEVIAFAN
      and then the director said: "Stop, filmed" and all the thump was gone.

      Precisely said !!! good good good
  7. Berkut24
    Berkut24 7 July 2016 17: 34
    +6
    In fact, raising an enterprise from ruins, gathering specialists, making equipment, and purchasing equipment is a huge deal. With an initiative! Further it will be easier. Our equipment, especially military and space, should work on ours.
  8. Riv
    Riv 7 July 2016 17: 41
    +1
    It's funny to read how nichrome schoolchildren who do not understand the topic are happy about the successes of domestic, I’m not afraid of the word, nanotechnology.

    Meanwhile, the microcontroller is essentially a single-chip computer capable of performing relatively simple tasks. And that’s all. And the first full-fledged microcontroller was released already in shaggy 1976. Such things ... Technology for almost forty years. Specifically, the microcontroller described in the article is probably (but not a fact) intended, as is written in the article, to control the operation of the electric motor.

    So the matter is good and useful, but there are no special reasons to throw bonnets into the air. Similar schemes were made in the USSR.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 7 July 2016 18: 03
      +2
      Only the performance of that microcontroller was different.
    2. barbiturate
      barbiturate 7 July 2016 20: 23
      +1
      It's funny to read your koment, you are probably not a schoolboy, but write this. That tanks participated in the First World War, and ours are sawing some T-14, and the Americans of the new modification Abrams - well, aren't they? Presentations are satisfied, happy))
      It is said in the article - it is not inferior to the best world analogues and better than something produced domestically. Apparently foreigners saw the controllers of the 1976 type, and our madmen finally reached the same level - 1976 - cheers comrades !!! laughing
      1. Riv
        Riv 8 July 2016 14: 01
        0
        "Not inferior ... Better ..." But it is not said WHAT it is not inferior to. Frequency? It is not difficult to build it up, but some special performance is not needed to control the electric motor. Multi-core? Not a word about it. Quoting from the article:

        in robotic complexes, the microcontroller will be responsible for the interaction of the engine and navigation systems

        Exaggerating: this is a leash between the blind and the lead dog. The simplest functionality. Yes, and the production of 100.000 units per year suggests that the product is not too complicated. How to know? Maybe something of the 70s was copied, since the production technology is already available.
        1. barbiturate
          barbiturate 8 July 2016 17: 07
          +1
          Quote: Riv
          "Not inferior ... Better ..." But it is not said WHAT it is not inferior to. Frequency? It is not difficult to build it up, but some special performance is not needed to control the electric motor. Multi-core? Not a word about it.


          Well this is a short review article on topwar, do you want a detailed description and complex terms? Duck go to specialized forums and sites, read about this controller and about those to which it is not inferior, everything is described in detail there. You can compare the functionality and tasks of the controllers of 1976 and 2016, for those interested, there is everything.
          1. Riv
            Riv 9 July 2016 06: 17
            -2
            That's the point, comrade. A product of level ... well, not of the 70s, of course, but somewhere in the mid-90s.
            1. barbiturate
              barbiturate 9 July 2016 10: 09
              0
              All the same, I do not understand your logic smile The product was created at the modern level, at the level of modern Western counterparts, so 20 has passed! years since the mid-90s, so the functionality of such devices is constantly expanding and we need new controllers, better and better. Yes, and in electronics 20 years is a huge period, you understand how it can be at the level of the mid-90s, completely different functionality, other features, a completely different design, circuitry, the ability to control devices and pair with other smart devices, other interfaces and user friendliness, but this is not done by itself, everything needs to be created by people, spend a lot of money and labor.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  9. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 7 July 2016 17: 52
    +3
    Let's live in Mudko and the entire Russian national football team!
    1. Siberia 9444
      Siberia 9444 7 July 2016 18: 22
      +1
      Humpback grave will NOT fix laughing I don’t understand much about this, but what they started to produce their own +.
  10. Dan4eG
    Dan4eG 7 July 2016 17: 53
    -4
    “The controller has a performance of up to 125 MIPS, which corresponds to the level of the most modern foreign models and significantly exceeds most domestic analogues. In the near future, we plan to reach the level of production up to 100 thousands of such products per year. ”

    MIPS R4400 (1 core sgi crimson) 120 MIPS at 150 MHz 0.567 1993

    maybe I don’t understand something!
    1. Khariton
      Khariton 7 July 2016 18: 08
      +1
      Quote: Dan4eG
      “The controller has a performance of up to 125 MIPS, which corresponds to the level of the most modern foreign models and significantly exceeds most domestic analogues. In the near future, we plan to reach the level of production up to 100 thousands of such products per year. ”

      MIPS R4400 (1 core sgi crimson) 120 MIPS at 150 MHz 0.567 1993

      maybe I don’t understand something!

      In Israel, they do better ... bully Take it easy!
    2. bk316
      bk316 7 July 2016 18: 27
      +5
      Quote: Dan4eG
      maybe I don’t understand something!

      The article is not about the CPU but about the DSP.
      From memory to vskidku any TMS320.
      The R4400 is not a DSP.
      1. Khariton
        Khariton 7 July 2016 18: 36
        0
        Quote: bk316
        Quote: Dan4eG
        maybe I don’t understand something!

        The article is not about the CPU but about the DSP.
        From memory to vskidku any TMS320.
        The R4400 is not a DSP.

        You better keep quiet about the technical parameters ... They specifically provoke the language to begin to grind. Their work is to identify and fish out .... bully
        1. In100gram
          In100gram 7 July 2016 20: 05
          +1
          Quote: Chariton
          You better keep quiet about the technical parameters ... They specifically provoke the language to begin to grind. Their work is to identify and fish out ....

          I don’t think it’s very secret. It’s still necessary to program it. Probably request
          1. Khariton
            Khariton 7 July 2016 20: 42
            -2
            Quote: In100gram
            Quote: Chariton
            You better keep quiet about the technical parameters ... They specifically provoke the language to begin to grind. Their work is to identify and fish out ....

            I don’t think it’s very secret. It’s still necessary to program it. Probably request

            That's it, and you asked a good question .. !!! How and who can ... bully Well let the men show off! bully (In a personal way, of course, and then share the source code to prove that you are the coolest of all ..)))) That's how technology all goes abroad ... We love to boast of developments in Russia .. am
      2. Dan4eG
        Dan4eG 7 July 2016 19: 34
        +2
        thank you good
        didn't get it!
    3. AleksPol
      AleksPol 8 July 2016 02: 14
      0
      Do not forget about bit depth
    4. Sunseich
      Sunseich 10 July 2016 11: 36
      0
      you don’t understand architecture ...
      compare Z80 and i7
  11. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 7 July 2016 19: 09
    0
    Quote: vladislaw2016
    Well this is 1-2 thousand pieces per year. If they had done for a tablet, they would have produced 5 million per year. A completely different market!

    And for your pen not to make a product with low-power valves at the output (namely, this is discussed in the article) not to do (just a couple of pieces), or you do not know what a pen is? Child iPhone ...
  12. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 7 July 2016 19: 18
    +1
    Quote: Vadim237
    Specifically, the microcontroller described in the article is probably (but not a fact) intended, as is written in the article, to control the operation of the electric motor.

    Management and controlOn medium (up to 200-500mA) valve we hang the power harness, write the desired algorithm in the ROM, start the control through the OS, but without details, something like this, the machine works according to the algorithm.
  13. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 7 July 2016 19: 33
    0
    This will be a breakthrough for Russia. And where and how to use the microcontroller will show practice. And then the guys have already started arguing here where and how to apply the novelty
    1. Khariton
      Khariton 7 July 2016 19: 46
      -2
      Quote: Anchonsha
      This will be a breakthrough for Russia. And where and how to use the microcontroller will show practice. And then the guys have already started arguing here where and how to apply the novelty

      Actually, we have our own processors .. (different ..))) And the operating systems (adapted by the way and protected) .. Ok Google! Rules the world so far, etc ...
      Nothing will come and our time, where everything will be honest (well, almost ..))) hi
  14. AFG-X
    AFG-X 7 July 2016 19: 50
    +1
    Probably we are talking about him:
    http://www.niiet.ru/news/582-niietk1921vk01t
    Good microcontroller. The main thing for them now is to get a normal yield of suitable MK,
    hone the technology because it also affects the cost.
    And with this:
    http://www.tadviser.ru/index.php/Продукт:Ангстрем:_IGBT-моду
  15. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 7 July 2016 19: 56
    0
    Quote: Riv
    Meanwhile, the microcontroller is essentially a single-chip computer capable of performing relatively simple tasks. And all

    Colleague, let me correct you - the MK itself is not a "single-chip computer", but only a dull tool of management and control in terms of performing the assigned functions, its tasks to correctly interface with the periphery. He does not have his own brain, but he performs his work according to commands from outside and reports on the execution of commands in fact.
  16. TOR2
    TOR2 7 July 2016 20: 40
    +1
    Microcontrollers are good, but it's time to start processing boards for industrial computers.
    1. Khariton
      Khariton 7 July 2016 20: 50
      0
      Quote: TOR2
      Microcontrollers are good, but it's time to start processing boards for industrial computers.

      Without your order, they have been doing everything for a long time .... laughing Silent and no PR!
      IBM is our development was 80% ... (did not save, someone sold, or chatted)
  17. Starik72
    Starik72 7 July 2016 21: 07
    +1
    Good news ! And more to produce such things, and different, that would be from what, smart heads to collect different, useful and necessary products for us!
  18. Former battalion commander
    Former battalion commander 7 July 2016 23: 15
    -4
    The news is not like that if before the Great Patriotic War in the USSR they announced that they would start producing the latest samples of spears and bows, and even 100 thousand. per year ... This controller is at about the same level as spears and arrows ... Of course fish and fish without fish and cancer ... at least something, and there IS NOTHING at all! But the controller itself is MIZER considering it to be bundled in the form of software products, translators, programmers, modelers (even there are no such words in Russian yet),. Not only is the quantity SIMPLY FUNNY, but the controller’s functionality is microscopic ... drive control, communication ... In general, such a message from a specialist will cause only a BIT SMILE ...
    1. AleksPol
      AleksPol 8 July 2016 02: 28
      +1
      Judging by your komment special you still that
      considering its binding in the form of software products, translators, programmers, modelers
      and yes causes a smile smile
      1. aksakal
        aksakal 8 July 2016 09: 06
        0
        Quote: AleksPol
        considering its binding in the form of software products, translators, programmers, modelers

        - the former battalion commander means, if you make a small UAV on electric motors, then in addition to the microcontroller you really need a lot of things - GPS-GLONASS / sensors, and for stand-alone navigation cases - IMU modules for inertial navigation based on the Majwick algorithm, modems for data transfer, lithium batteries , modulators for direct control of engines, interfaces like Weifai, only serious ones, like zigbee and much more.
        But this is not as complicated as the most important detail - the microcontroller itself. You know how to make a microcontroller - the rest is a matter of money and sensible organizers, with specialists and competencies in the production of all these modulators in the country where microcontrollers are made, the question is not worth it. Combat is dramatic.
  19. Mestny
    Mestny 8 July 2016 00: 59
    0
    Quote: Riv
    Specifically, the microcontroller described in the article is probably (but not a fact) intended, as is written in the article, to control the operation of the electric motor.

    That is, as usual - "I don't know anything about it, I haven't read the article, but I have an opinion."
  20. Sunseich
    Sunseich 10 July 2016 11: 40
    0
    in March he was at an exhibition in Moscow, at the same time approached our developers of cunning MK and others like them.
    their answers:
    yes, a little, but for a specific user
    no, everything is mine, the core is purchased, peripherals, encoders, bus drivers are mine
    yes, my production
    no, not only in ceramics, but also in plastic
    yes, 10 times more expensive than "Chinese"
    there is no chance of running into "bookmarks",
    Yes, compilers are suitable, since the kernel is purchased,
    no, we don’t give examples, register the periphery with pens,
    yes, glitches come across,
    no, we do not straighten out quickly, only in the next batch
    yes, we answer letters
    no, we can’t put everything openly
  21. Munchhausen
    Munchhausen 10 July 2016 15: 57
    0
    Listen, if the kernel is still purchased, are you sure you can't run into "bookmarks"?