Military Review

Takeoff over the sea: MiG-29K will strengthen the combat power of the flagship of the Russian Navy

36
Takeoff over the sea: MiG-29K will strengthen the combat power of the flagship of the Russian Navy



4th of July. / TASS /. In the Barents Sea, tests of the updated aviation flagship group naval fleet (Navy) of the Russian Federation "Admiral Kuznetsov".
It is expected that in the autumn of 2016, the cruiser carrier-based aviation will be involved in striking militants in Syria from the eastern Mediterranean. For the first time, the newest carrier-based MiG-29K fighters will be used, which until recently were not permanently stationed on an aircraft carrier.

"The plan for the participation of deck pilots of a mixed wing in attacking terrorist groups in the Syrian Arab Republic by the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces is aimed at giving crews the practice of performing sorties from the deck of an aircraft carrier to destroy ground targets"
Military diplomatic source TASS


Correct gain

According to Tass military reviewer Viktor Litovkin, the appearance of MiGs on a ship will complement the existing deck fighters Su-33.


Su-33

First of all, this is due to the fact that the Su-33 is no longer being released and is not being fully upgraded. The expert believes that "without prospects for improving the performance of the fighter, it is difficult to count on it." At the same time, a certain number of these aircraft still remain in the Kuznetsov wing.

The MiG-29K carrier-based fighter has already entered the series and has repeatedly been successfully “tested” for its military colleagues from India. The planes are shipped to this country from 2009. In total, the 45 copies of the MiG-29K and MiG-29KUB (under two contracts - from 2004 of the 16 sides, in the amount of $ 730 million , and from 2010 g. on 29 boards, in the amount of $ 1,2 billion).

The MiG-29K was developed in various modes for the Indian aircraft carrier Vikramaditya (former Admiral Gorshkov), its anti-corrosion protection was improved, the airframe was strengthened, the landing gear was strengthened, the capacity of the fuel tanks was increased, the system of refueling was increased, and the number of types was increased in addition, a new airborne electronic equipment was installed that can be improved for new tasks "
Viktor Litovkin

According to the expert, the fact that the MiG-29K is much easier than the Su-33 is also of no small importance. It takes up less space in the hangar of an aircraft carrier, that is, more planes can be used in the naval grouping than before.


Build MiG-29KUB

First deck

The fourth-generation fighter, the MiG-29K, became the first combat aircraft in the USSR capable of taking off from the deck of a ship and boarding it in the usual way - with a run-up and run.



The fighter is designed to solve the tasks of air defense of naval connections, destruction of surface and ground targets at any time of the day.

It was developed in 1980's. The team of the Separate design bureau of the plant number 155 (Design Bureau named after AI Mikoyan, now the Russian Aircraft Manufacturing Corporation MiG JSC) under the leadership of Chief Designer Mikhail Waldenberg, later significantly upgraded.
In the USSR, MiG-29K was built in single copies at the Moscow Machine-Building Plant Znamya Truda (now the production complex number 2 of RSK MiG). In the Russian Federation, mass production was launched in 2000's at the Lukhovitsy Machine-Building Plant (production complex 1 number of JSC "RSK" MiG ") in the Moscow region.

The first flight of the MiG-29K took place 23 June 1988, the car was piloted by a test pilot of the OKB. Mikoyan Toktar Aubakirov. He 1 November 1989 g. Performed the first landing on the deck of heavy aircraft-carrying cruiser "Tbilisi" (now - "Admiral of the fleet of the Soviet Union Kuznetsov") and the first take-off from the ship's springboard.

In the second half of the 1980's. for the training of pilots, a project of a two-seater MiG-29KU with separate cabins of an instructor and a trained pilot was developed, however, at the beginning of 1990's, work was suspended.



In the 2000-ies, after the conclusion of a contract for the supply of carrier-based fighters of the Indian Navy, a deck-based combat training fighter MiG-29KUB was created with a common two-seat cockpit. His first flight took place on 20 on January 2007, the car was piloted by a crew of Mikhail Belyaev and Pavel Vlasov. Repeatedly experienced a plane in the Barents Sea and the head of the corporation "MiG" Sergei Korotkov.


Fighter MiG-XNUMKKUB

Easier, stronger and more economical

Today, the MiG corporation is creating new aircraft of the unified MiG-29K / KUB family, MiG-29М / М2, as well as a promising fighter of the 4 ++ generation MiG-35. All of them are designed as a new platform, which has a good potential for increasing combat capabilities based on the use of technologies inherent in aircraft of the fifth generation.


Fighter MiG-29М2

Externally, the new fighters are similar to the usual MiG-29, but they are completely new aircraft with major changes in the design of the fuselage, on-board equipment and materials used in the production. About 15% of the entire fuselage surface are composites, which are five times lighter than steel and much stronger.

The use of composites has significantly reduced the weight of new machines. These savings went on increasing the combat load and fuel reserves. While the classic MiG-29 could carry 2,5 t suspensions, the ship’s already 4,5, and the MiG-35 more than 6 t. The internal tanks of the new MiGs hold almost one and a half times more fuel.

In addition, the aircraft received an in-flight refueling system, which, in conjunction with the new air-to-ground missiles, will make it possible to accomplish tasks previously only available to bombers.

THE FLIGHT-TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SERIAL VARIANT MIG-29K



The length of the aircraft - 17,3 m.
Height - 4,4 m.
Wingspan - 11,99 m (full) or 7,80 m (in the aircraft carrier parking lot).
Practical ceiling - 17 500 m.
Ferrying range - 2 ths. Km, with outboard fuel tanks - 3 ths. Km (2700 km with outboard tanks at the MiG-29CUB).
Maximum take-off weight - 24 500 kg.
Maximum speed at altitude - 2200 km / h.
Deck versions of the MiG-29 can be based on aircraft-carrying ships with a displacement of 28 KT, equipped with a take-off springboard and a landing arrestor and capable of receiving airplanes weighing more than 20 T. Also, the aircraft can be located on land aerodromes.
The wing mechanization was seriously changed: the aircraft was able to take off with a shortened run-up and land at a lower speed.
The appearance of the MiG-29K carrier-based fighter will significantly increase the combat potential of the Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft-carrying cruiser, which will make future plans for the creation of the Russian aircraft carrier fleet logical.


Fighter MiG-XNUMKKUB

Flying by wire
On the MiG-29K fully implemented the principle of "glass cabin", all digital devices. The display is displayed on color liquid crystal displays. The usual steering system has been replaced by an electronic system: in the west it is called fly-by-wire (TASS).
The MiG-29K is armed with a 30 mm caliber cannon (150 ammunition), on 8 suspension units can carry up to 4500 kg of payload. Thanks to modern electronics, it is able to use the whole range of high-precision missiles and aerial bombs, including the newest supersonic anti-ship cruise missiles X-31 and X-35, television-guided bombs.

The survival rate of the aircraft in combat has been significantly increased due to the introduction of elements of the stealth technology and increasing the capabilities of the onboard defense complex by installing missile launch detection systems and laser irradiation.
The on-board radio-electronic equipment of the serial version of the fighter includes the Zhuk-ME radar station (it provides tracking of air targets to 10, simultaneous firing of four of them with missiles), the Uzel additional navigation system, the Karat automatic control and recording complex.
The aircraft are installed on-board video registration system, autonomous power generation system for ground checks of equipment without starting the main engines.
The RD-33MK engines are an improved version of the RD-33, which were installed on the classic MiG-29. Thanks to the refinement of the motors, their power increased by 8%, the modern digital control system FADEC was introduced.
On the basis of the MiG-29K / KUB, airfield-based fighter jets were created and mass-produced: the single MiG-29М and the double MiG-29М2. In 2012, in celebration of the 100 anniversary of the Russian Air Force, the MiG-29М2 was demonstrated in a joint flight with the fifth-generation fighter PAK FA (T-50). Also, this serial version was successfully demonstrated in Kazakhstan, Serbia and Slovakia.
In the opinion of test pilots of the MiG-29K, from the very beginning, high maneuverability characteristics, safety, automation, simplicity and intuitiveness of control for the pilot were laid in the plane.


Fighter MiG-29KUB Indian Navy

Without competitors

According to military experts, in their flight-technical and operational characteristics, the new shipboard MiGs are at least not inferior to modern foreign fighters of the 4 + and 4 ++ generation. These aircraft are mass-produced and are being used by the United States (F / A-18E / F) and Western European states (Rafale, Typhoon, Gripen).

In terms of the efficiency / cost ratio, the MiG-29К / KUB / M / М2 is one of the most promising proposals on the world market. In connection with the cessation of production of French fighters "Mirage 2000" and the expected withdrawal from the market of the American F-16 fighter aircraft, the Russian aircraft simply will not have Western competitors in the market niche of inexpensive lightweight fighters.
According to a TASS military observer, the MiG-29K can be compared to the American carrier-based multifunctional fighter F / A-18E / F Super Hornet.

"The maximum take-off weight in favor of the American. In addition - almost 30 tons, ours - 22,5 tons. And the American can take ammunition aboard, of course, more: 8 tons versus 5,5. F-18 has a greater variety of military equipment used, as well as armament suspension nodes. But the combat radius without fuel tanks in our favor: 726 km they have against our 850 km. Above we have a practical ceiling: 15 km they have against 17,5 km we "
Viktor Litovkin


Another advantage is high maneuverability. At the same time, Litovkin explains, Russia is inferior to the United States in the number of ship-borne fighters and in the multi-purpose aircraft carrier groups themselves.
"We have only one aircraft carrier, they have 10. And they are also based on long-range radar patrol and guidance aircraft, which dramatically enhances the combat capabilities of the group. We have such a function as helicopters, whose radius of action is much smaller than that of an aircraft"
Viktor Litovkin



MiG-29K

Perspectives in Russia

In 2013-2015 The United Aircraft Building Corporation (UAC) supplied the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation with 20 MiG-29KR units and four MiG-29KUBR units under the 29 contract in February 2012. Russian Navy.

20 March 2016 at the airfield of the Center for Combat Use and Retraining Naval Aviation (Eisk, Krasnodar Territory) began MiG-29KR / KUBR flights from the 2016 of the Northern Fleet of the Russian Navy recreated in January of the 100. .
If aircraft of the MiG-29М / М2 family will allow to keep the niche of light fighters of the ground group, and the creation of the new MiG-35 will bring it close in combat capabilities to the fifth generation fighters, the ship's MiG-29K will eventually become the main naval aircraft of the Russian Navy.
Originator:
http://tass.ru/armiya-i-opk/3425011
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. gozmos
    gozmos 9 July 2016 06: 12
    +1
    A little more air carrier cruisers would do ... and the planes are super .. our go)))
    1. HERMES
      HERMES 9 July 2016 06: 46
      +1
      Where is Su-33 ?? ... this car would seriously enhance the power of Kuznetsov ....

      In the future, having upgraded to the level of the Su-35, I will operate in conjunction with the carrier-based Su-50 (there are already plans) ... no "Nimitz" or "Ford" with their F-35 will be lying around.


      1. Pushkar77
        Pushkar77 9 July 2016 12: 36
        +8
        At the moment, Russia has only one multipurpose carrier-based fighter, the MiG-29K (KUBR). Heavy deck boat, namely T-50, if there is, it is only in "digital". Here it is necessary to take into account the fact that you will fold the wings of the T-50. If you start to create a heavy multipurpose aircraft based on the Su-33, or Su-35, then you will have to heavily weight the already heavy fighter. Because in order to land when returning to an aircraft carrier with expensive unused guided weapons (and this is a prerequisite for creating a deck), you will have to greatly enhance the fighter, for "Drying" this is already a lot, this time. Secondly, the creation of a deck boat is the most expensive pleasure, the creation of the MiG shipbuilder was paid for by the Indians. And thirdly, there is no order for the development of a promising aircraft carrier, so why throw a couple of tens of billions into the pipe. And if we compare the effectiveness of the Su-33 and MiG-29KUBR, then it is inappropriate, the MiG-29K (KUBR) is a multi-purpose vehicle, and the Su-33 is a pure fighter. with the MiG "Kuzya" after modernization will become a full-fledged aircraft carrier capable of performing both strike and escort functions. Photo "Vikra" and MiGs, the Indians are very happy with both the ship and the plane. On the whole, it is necessary to revive the program for the construction of aircraft carriers, so that there is where to place both heavy and light fighters, but for now there are enough existing types.
        1. pl675
          pl675 9 July 2016 13: 12
          -1
          the phrase "Hindus are very happy with the ship and the plane" you yourself thought of?
          would you be happy with your car if it were not repaired for three days and a year, and not for 800 rubles, but for 15 thousand?
          on the wing, too, not everything was smooth.
          1. lelikas
            lelikas 9 July 2016 13: 21
            +1
            Quote: pl675
            the phrase "Hindus are very happy with the ship and the plane" you yourself thought of?
            would you be happy with your car if it were not repaired for three days and a year, and not for 800 rubles, but for 15 thousand?
            on the wing, too, not everything was smooth.

            Where do you get such strange orders of numbers for comparison?
            1. pl675
              pl675 9 July 2016 13: 32
              -1
              http://polit.ru/news/2008/05/27/gorshkov/
              1. lelikas
                lelikas 9 July 2016 16: 13
                +1
                Quote: pl675
                //polit.ru/news/2008/05/27/gorshkov/

                They cheat lightly - initially, the contract was signed, almost for a lard, and this is without planes, of which the Indians paid only half. Ours, however, did the trick themselves, apparently I really wanted to snatch such an order.
                Even if we take the initial terms and prices, then the double increase is slightly different from your 121 and 18, respectively. ;)
        2. HERMES
          HERMES 9 July 2016 15: 34
          0
          Quote: Pushkar77
          Pushkar77


          Common thoughts ... to you +.
          But I don’t agree with the problems of the Su-33 ... The Su-33 in the modern version can be modified as the Su-30SM ... Impact qualities will be high. As for strengthening the structure ... Su-34 developments to help. Will it be hard to land? Americans B-25 planted on their aircraft carriers at the time ... today you can come up with something.
          And the T-50 could just become a fighter-cover. Breaking his wings ... I agree ... it's not such an easy task, they are all such stealths, etc. But they will come up with ... if they could rivet such an airplane.

          But the aircraft carrier armed with the MiG-29K alone ... will still be weak. Moreover, there will not be 20 such aircraft carriers ... but only 2 maximum in the coming years.
          It will be a great success to fulfill its direct purpose ... but Western analogues will be more powerful in this case.
          1. VIT101
            VIT101 9 July 2016 20: 46
            +1
            Quote: HERMES
            Will it be hard to land? Americans B-25 landed on their aircraft carriers at the time ... today you can come up with something.

            You can think of it - install a steam catapult. The problem of the heavy Su is not in landing but in take-off with full refueling and weapons.
          2. 73bor
            73bor 9 July 2016 23: 54
            +2
            The Americans didn’t land the B-25 on the aircraft carrier, but only took off stripping it to the skin, and the Su-33 is full of takeoff weight restrictions and you can’t do anything with it (only a catapult)!
        3. Andrei from Chelyabinsk
          Andrei from Chelyabinsk 9 July 2016 17: 46
          0
          Quote: Pushkar77
          Here we must take into account the fact that you fold the wings of the T-50

          Religion will hinder? :)
          Quote: Pushkar77
          If you start to create a heavy multi-purpose vehicle based on the Su-33, or Su-35, then you will have to heavily weight the already heavy fighter

          Given the fact that the Su-35 is already a multi-role fighter, the statement is at least strange.
          Quote: Pushkar77
          Secondly, the creation of a deck is the most expensive pleasure, the creation of the MiG boat was paid by the Hindus.

          There is nothing super expensive there. The MiG ship was created under the USSR, the Indians had nothing to do with it, another question is that the deck MiG created in the USSR for the Hindu contract was outdated by TTX, a new avionics and so on were needed, and this is what the Indians really paid for, but the deck specifics all this has no relation
          Quote: Pushkar77
          And thirdly, there is no order to develop a promising aircraft carrier, so why throw a couple of tens of billions into the pipe.

          I do not know. I doubt that remaking a T-50 into a deck is at least half that amount. In rubles. Although of course everything can be.
          Quote: Pushkar77
          But in general, it is necessary to revive the program for the construction of aircraft carriers

          T-50 deck, do it now, it still does not appear quickly, so why not?
        4. Malkor
          Malkor 10 July 2016 21: 45
          +1
          Now there are no options, only the MiG-29K can strengthen our aircraft carrier. The MiG-29K is a good machine, only the combat radius is small, if you fly to the eastern border of Syria you won’t be able to take full ammunition.
    2. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 9 July 2016 10: 12
      +6
      Moreover, explains Litovkin, Russia inferior USA by the number of ship fighters and by the multipurpose aircraft carrier groups.
      sounds almost comical ... "inferior" ... yeah! Yes, he doesn’t dull, Litovkin, but it’s just almost not in comparison with the states, although why is military power always compared with the United States? you need to compare it with NATO, then you can see how many times apart from nuclear weapons, we are far behind in everything.
      1. Pushkar77
        Pushkar77 9 July 2016 12: 45
        +3
        Here you are right Andrei Yurievich, mattress makers can put up ten AUGs on the move, with destroyers and Ticonderogs. The numbers are, of course, stunning. The task of the "Kuzi" escort of the Mediterranean group and 19 fighters on it are crumbs. It is necessary in Syria to build up the grouping of fighters, Su-30SM, Su-35, and if necessary, the MiG-31BM, naval aviation, to put it mildly, will not be enough to contain mattress mats ...
        1. 73bor
          73bor 9 July 2016 23: 58
          0
          How Americans can expose we know all the trash from the desert collected! And judging by the latest data from pilots for all ten air wings, they simply do not have it (after all, they are not just pilots but ship ones)!
    3. NEXUS
      NEXUS 27 September 2016 12: 05
      +1
      gozmos
      A little more air carrier cruisers would do ... and the planes are super .. our go)))

      Somehow I got to an article that described work in the USSR on an atomic aircraft carrier screen. The topic is very interesting and confident having the right to life. I think this is a more acceptable path for us than the construction of aircraft carriers.
      And the conversation was about the ekranolet, and not the ekranoplan. The ekranolet is capable of flying like an airplane, unlike the ekranoplan, and at the same time it works like the last. And the construction time, in comparison with the aircraft carrier, will be much less. And with a good series, in a relatively good period, we can get a mobile high-speed aircraft carrier fleet, which really will have no analogues.
  2. Seryikit
    Seryikit 9 July 2016 06: 20
    +5
    I sincerely hope that MIG will continue to actively develop and continue to please us with new, competitively capable developments.
  3. aszzz888
    aszzz888 9 July 2016 06: 45
    +1
    And one in the field is a warrior! (in the sense of "Adm.Kuznetsov" at sea).
  4. Nubia2
    Nubia2 9 July 2016 06: 49
    +2
    Fine. Great workout.
    But, the west will once again break up. Ignore them. The same kind of training.
  5. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 9 July 2016 07: 10
    +2
    Quote: HERMES
    Where is Su-33 ?? ... this car would seriously enhance the power of Kuznetsov ....

    They wrote to you in the article:
    First of all, this is due to the fact that the Su-33s are no longer produced and their complete modernization is not carried out. At the same time, a certain number of these aircraft still remain in the Kuznetsov air wing.
  6. donavi49
    donavi49 9 July 2016 08: 09
    +5
    As for work on land, in Syrian conditions, without containers, he will be blind.

    Hindus actively equip Damocles and Rafael Litening (here MKI theirs for example) for work on the earth. Domestic T-220 (OAO NPK SPP) and Sapsan (UOMZ) are still prototypes. By the way, UOMZ and Tales, even in 2012, could start stamping the container according to the Catherine scheme, but then there was no customer and no money, and in 2014 Tales had his hands twisted and a refusal started.
    1. Pushkar77
      Pushkar77 9 July 2016 12: 53
      -1
      By the way, the container seemed to be tested, or the next program was pushed back. So many programs pushed, and another sixth generation begin to build. It would be better to finish the fifth and the same target designation containers, a thing very necessary, you can create fighters two, three tons easier in dry weight than now.
  7. berezin1987
    berezin1987 9 July 2016 09: 09
    0
    The MIG-29 is a good car, but a modernized Su-33 with a modern breo would be much better. It is unfortunate that there is no marine modification of the su-35. A heavy aircraft has a much wider range, a more powerful airborne radar and a larger bomb load. It’s bad that the instant-29k doesn’t have afar radar, but the super hornet has it installed.
    1. Pushkar77
      Pushkar77 9 July 2016 13: 05
      +2
      You see, in order to cram a modern avionics in the Su-33, you need to return to the R&D stage, that is, start from scratch. Target designation containers are needed, but there is something to hear about them. The fact that the MiG does not have a PFAR, AFAR, with good characteristics, you are right here, it is there, but they categorically do not want to finish it. In the future, they will install the grate, but according to the written TTX, it is inferior to the AFAR which was developed for the Hindus and which now lies on the shelf. A lot of our programs are neutered. The elections are coming soon, so maybe the money will be transferred to the social. programs. But most importantly, we do not have a program for the development of an aircraft carrier fleet, which management seems unnecessary, therefore, they are not involved in the development of heavy deck vehicles, because they require heavy aircraft carrier platforms.
  8. berezin1987
    berezin1987 9 July 2016 09: 23
    0
    I hope the work on the deck fighter of a new generation is already underway. By the time the aircraft carrier was built by the 2030, there should already be a serial deck t-50 and a prototype of the sixth generation aircraft.
    1. Zheka40
      Zheka40 9 July 2016 10: 50
      +1
      This is to am, they love versatility.)
  9. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 9 July 2016 10: 32
    0
    Nothing prevents the upgrade of the Su-33 to an almost modern level. CM3, CM. Until the Su-30/35, as I understand it, the glider will not allow updating. A glass cockpit, a radar with a PFAR or AFAR, is quite capable of expanding the range of missiles. I think this is the next stage. At a range of Su-33 using AFAR and Avax will not be needed ...
    1. berezin1987
      berezin1987 9 July 2016 10: 43
      +1
      Most likely the resource of the glider is not enough for modernization. Electronics can of course be upgraded, but it is better to focus on the instant 29k or the deck of the 5 generation.
      1. Simpsonian
        Simpsonian 9 July 2016 14: 01
        +1
        about the modernization of the airframe, there was no question at all
    2. donavi49
      donavi49 9 July 2016 10: 44
      +2
      Money is a hindrance.

      Actually, therefore, they refused.

      The Hindus ordered 45 cars and the MiG-29K / UB went to them for the Navy with a steam train - quite a bit of money came out (the Indians paid the main costs + production).

      With the Su-33 is a different situation. There are no foreign customers and never will be. At the same time, the order for modernization will be on-board at 16. That is, you have to pay for the development of the side (even if most of them will be transferred from Su-30/35), develop the whole mechanism, cooperation, and begin modernization. And all this on 16 boards. Everyone and the F-22 will beat for the price.

      Plus, the Su-33 has no UB version, a crutch in the form of the Su-25UTG is attached to them. But the MiG has a UB version and they don’t need a crutch in the form of a UTG (only for basic training of young pilots and the first landings, unless). And the UB version, by the way, is not only good as a training one, but also for complex tasks, for example, searching and guiding against ground targets in the same Syria (but everything rests on the container, there's really nothing to look for). UTG I recall a purely training machine, pylons and all weapons dismantled, the board is lightened.
      1. Simpsonian
        Simpsonian 9 July 2016 13: 58
        0
        already experienced pilots fly on deck, automation works for land
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 9 July 2016 14: 14
          +4
          Even experienced passengers fly (everyone has their first landing, their first landing after a year's break, training on the simulator, the first landing and take-off from the simulator, etc.). On the Su-33 is impossible. Therefore, they came up with the Su-25UTG - cutting off everything superfluous from it (including weapons, a gun, sighting systems — covering everything with plugs) and squeezing the take-off weight by 3 tons easier.

          On MiG - you can roll in without a layer in the form of a Su-25UTG, and on a full-fledged KUB board.

          Automation will cope, only for a stationary target - for example, a strategic barn or something similar. But in terms of moving targets, as well as those that need to be searched (for example, on a free hunt, the same Su-34s felt great in Syria) - without an aiming system in any way, but the MiG does not. This is solved either by the built-in (like the Su-34) or container.
          1. Simpsonian
            Simpsonian 10 July 2016 04: 54
            0
            UTG copes with this? Have you removed your armor? In terms of combat effectiveness, the MiG-29 is very inferior to the Su-33.
            This is always decided by the container, especially if there is not enough space on the plane because it is small.
  10. Tsoy
    Tsoy 9 July 2016 10: 37
    0
    Quote: berezin1987
    I hope the work on the deck fighter of a new generation is already underway. By the time the aircraft carrier was built by the 2030, there should already be a serial deck t-50 and a prototype of the sixth generation aircraft.


    Your words, yes, to God in the ears ... but based on the current terms of building ships for the fleet, it is very unlikely that the Russian aircraft carrier will appear by 2030. Not to mention the deck version of the T50 and / or 6 generation aircraft. And if he needed? In addition to the aircraft aviamatki need support. 2-3 destroyer, 1-2 cruisers, supply ships, developed coastal infrastructure, air group, a lot of research and development, expenses for crew training and so on.
    1. berezin1987
      berezin1987 9 July 2016 10: 41
      0
      The deck of the t-50 may appear in the middle of the 20's. I think that the developers laid such an opportunity initially. And the sixth generation is likely to be unmanned and hypersonic, otherwise it makes no sense.
      1. Tsoy
        Tsoy 9 July 2016 11: 44
        +2
        Quote: berezin1987
        The t-50 deck can appear in the middle of the 20's.


        Appear, then it may appear, but where will it fly from? If Kuznetsov is used as a carrier, then for the 2 dozens of planes, it makes little sense to make a new modification of the T50. Yes, and without a catapult, there will be limitations on armaments, That is, a paradox is obtained ... There is no aircraft carrier, there is no point in making an airplane, there is no aircraft, there is no aircraft carrier
  11. exo
    exo 9 July 2016 12: 39
    0
    There is a refueling system on the MiG. But who will refuel? Each other using overhead refueling systems? There is no special board for this. Do pilots work out this component?
    There are a lot of questions. There is little trust in the appearance of the deck, based on the T-50. Especially when the number of these aircraft is voiced, in the usual version.
  12. pl675
    pl675 9 July 2016 12: 52
    +2
    I will add five kopecks for India - a lot of people have visited India in Goa, but few have noticed that in this wonderful state, at a common with civilian airfield, there is a training center for carrier-based aviation. with its own "thread", educational buildings, helicopter hangars. Russian specialists still work there. lucky to observe departures in pairs of dryers.
  13. red_october
    red_october 9 July 2016 21: 31
    +1
    The MiG-29K will then increase the combat power of the Kuznetsov, 'but how many pilots for this aircraft are really ready for the next trip to Mediterranean?

    So far, only 15 (!) Aircraft have been reported, that is, 8-10 Su-33s, which are already on the Kuznetsov deck for centuries, and 5-7 MiGs (out of 24 put into service) So it turns out?

    I hope this is inaccurate information and the media is wrong.

    On the other hand, in this campaign the ship Ka-52K will also try ...
  14. aviator65
    aviator65 10 July 2016 01: 13
    0
    "It was developed in the 1980s by the team Separate Design Bureau of Plant No. 155 (OKB named after A. Mikoyan, now - JSC "Russian Aircraft Corporation" MiG ") under the leadership of chief designer Mikhail Waldenberg, later significantly modernized.
    In the USSR, the MiG-29K was built in single copies at the Moscow machine-building plant "Znamya Truda" (now - production complex number 2 of JSC "RSK" MiG ")."
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    This is from what sources took information for the article?
    All the life of the OKB - it was just an EXPERIMENTAL design bureau. OKB them. A.I. Mikoyan, it is OKB 155, it is MMZ "Zenith". Next, about single copies. There were only 3 of them: two flight ("9-31 / 1" and "9-31 / 2") and one for statistical tests. All three were based on pilot production, i.e. at MMZ "Zenith".