USA: NATO will build relations with Moscow on the basis of "balance between force and dialogue"

NATO is going to build relations with Moscow on the basis of a balance between force and dialogue, reports RIA News US Permanent Representative with Douglas Lute Alliance.

“From the point of view of NATO, the main relationship should be a balance between power and dialogue. We will do what we need from the side of power, and equally we will be open to dialogue with Russia, because we think that this balance reflects the correct and responsible approach to the relations between NATO and Russia ”,

said the envoy at the briefing.

Earlier, the same approach was designated by the head of the Pentagon, Ashton Carter. According to him, this is a “strong and balanced” approach to relations between the alliance and Russia. Carter explained that "it is necessary to restrain" Russian aggression ", but at the same time to cooperate in those areas of security that are of mutual interest."

Comments

[avvg]

They cannot be trusted, they need a weak Russia, a strong Russia for them - like a bone across the throat.

[Stinger]

We will do what we need from the side of the force, and equally we will be open to dialogue with Russia, because we think that this balance reflects the correct and responsible approach to relations between NATO and Russia

So what is NATO for, which is not directed against Russia? Just balance on the brink of war.

[Imperialkolorad]

Rather, there will be a balance between outright lies and double standards.

[Mountain shooter]

The "hero" NATO decided to swing the sword, threaten, pulled the sword from its scabbard - but it does not come out - it rusted ...
Then his face twisted from the strain, and he yelled "from a position of strength" - so that the Russian hero would not notice the embarrassment ...

[Holsten]

It is very well indicated that for NATO, the argument in the dialogue is power.
Proceeding from this, the constant strengthening of Russian arguments cannot but rejoice. For the sake of completing the feelings of the opponents, it is only necessary to include industry among the friends of Russia except the army and navy.

[engineer74]

Hitler, after "force", had certain difficulties in the transition to "dialogue", do our probable "partners" remember this?
In general, this looks like a beautifully veiled "drain" of the policy of military pressure on Russia. After the summit, there will be no "force and dialogue", but "dialogue and strength".

[DMoroz]

Quote: engineer74

In general, it looks like a beautifully veiled "drain" of the policy of military pressure on Russia. After the summit, there will be no "force and dialogue", but "dialogue and strength". smile

It is necessary to continue to bend their line without paying attention to their howl, and then their transition from the position of "force", "force-dialogue", "dialogue-power" will pass to the position of simply "dialogue" (if there is a brain).

[DenZ]

Americans are masters of inventing rocky formulations. As I think in relations between Russia and NATO, essentially nothing will change. NATO will hatch their eyes to climb further east and expect that we will be afraid of them and bend under them.

[Xmyp]

Quote: avvg

They cannot be trusted, they need a weak Russia, a strong Russia for them - like a bone across the throat.

Thanks, Cap

[Machete]

About the balance of power and dialogue is said once every two days. They are not tired yet?
And between statements new parts are being transferred to our borders.
In short, everything will be as usual: they won’t be able to threaten us with anything real, but they will increase the grouping, which still can’t do anything.
Another cut of NATO money.

[Wedmak]

That is, they will continue to wave sabers at our borders, calling for dialogue? Actually, they did not expect anything else from them.

[Felix]

The balance between power and monologuehe wanted to say?

[knn54]

Back in 1923, English political scientist and publicist Norman Angel noted that "the balance of power" ALWAYS means "the desire to create a superiority of forces on our side.

[weksha50]

"We will do what we need from the side of force, and we will equally be open to dialogue with Russia" ...

Russia also needs to do what is necessary for its sovereignty and prosperity, without looking back at the US and NATO ...
Well, Lavrov and our next NATO representative will carry out their duties in the games of dialogue ... Conduct conversations that lead nowhere, and pretend that "Russia understands the fears of the United States (NATO), however ..." .. ...

[Belarus]

NATO (the United States), in principle, cannot at all or rather do not want to build relations with Moscow on the basis of a "balance between force and dialogue."
NATO has only one goal, at least this: sanitary cordon around Russia, followed by splitting into components at the nuclear level.
Only Belarus is lacking in the cordon and how everything will develop further only God knows. Personally, I stand for close cooperation with Russia.

[K-50]

NATO intends to build relations with Moscow based on balance between force and dialogue

They do not speak with Russia from a position of strength, for a losing position in advance, and dialogue always has a place and time!

[Olkass]

It’s time, Gentlemen, it’s time for you to develop a sucking reflex on NATO’s interlocutors.

[rotmistr60]

NATO will build relations with Moscow on the basis of “Balance between power and dialogue”

Personally, I, as a simple Russian, can only understand this sentence, how - do not rock the boat and do only what we tell you. Have you taken too much members of NATO. I don’t even want to talk about Psheks, and even more so the Baltic states - a woman’s pad, only for the benefit of women, and this underdeveloped ...

[rotmistr60]

I went to the site a few hours later and suddenly did not see the "bad guy" who was smashing the "putinoids" under the approval of the site publishers. What, guys are administrators. is it really a shame? Or did some norms start to play? It should be a shame to pour fouls on site visitors.

[CONTROL]

... strength ... dialogue ... Dialogue from a position of strength, demonstration of strength, followed by dialogue ... A blow to the head with a truncheon followed by a polite question: "How is it?" ... and a subsequent warning shot in the head? .. ...
Verbiage in the traditional style for Obama - and all the NATO / Godep leaders of the USA - style ... Have you forgotten any psaki?

[VICTOR-61]

You cannot trust the mattresses, they say one thing and do the other. We must do our job, which is beneficial for us and not what the Americans offer.

[Lelek]

[We will do what we need on the part of the force, and equally we will be open to dialogue with Russia.]

Well, yes, well, yes, we will continue to build up military potential around Russia and chatter our actions with "necessity" in view of the threats from Mongolia and North Korea. Do we need IT?

[viktor.]

Quote: avvg

They cannot be trusted, they need a weak Russia, a strong Russia for them - like a bone across the throat.

they don’t seem to believe them anymore they just need to lie too, deploy for example air defense on a cube to protect against ISIS with the ability to launch CALIBER! although they will understand correctly ISIS because the USA is a creation

[weksha50]

Quote: anna1980

deploy for example air defense on a cube to protect against ISIS with the ability to launch CALIBER!

Fool ...

[Cat man null]

Quote: weksha50

Quote: anna1980

deploy for example air defense on a cube to protect against ISIS with the ability to launch CALIBER!

Fool ...

I also liked it, I didn’t regret it as a minus

[Stariknv]

NATO and the US want to build their relationship with Russia only from a position of strength; they don’t need peace but need a war with Russia

[Phosgene]

NATO’s current policies lead directly to war.