Military Review

Russian activity in the Arctic as a nightmare for the West

122
The frequency of meetings of the Ministry of Defense on the restoration of military infrastructure in the Arctic region (New Siberian Islands, the Novaya Zemlya archipelago and other territories, including the points of material support of the Northern Sea Route) directly affects the degree of comments from Western "friends of Russia".


The notorious US Senator John McCain is the one who is impressed by posing in front of camera lenses together with “bearded boys” who later strangely become at the helm of international terrorist groups, each report on the Arctic by the main defense department of the Russian Federation is very close to their heart. So close that almost any comment by this Mr. comes down to the American equivalent of “pros..lipolymery”.

“We are hopelessly inferior to Russians in the development of military infrastructure in the Arctic,” the very thesis that McCain and others from the same “partner” camarilla have been exploiting since the time Russia began to pay close attention to the Arctic region construction of new icebreakers and the construction of military infrastructure.



Last December in the British edition of The Times appeared material, which contains the quintessence of recent anti-Russian phobias. In the material that bears the telling title “Arctic Aggression”, the author tries to build a very original logical chain. According to the British "expert", the Arctic is the third direction for "Putin's aggression." Immediately the question arises: what other two ... directions? .. The author on the pages of The Times reports that the first direction is Ukraine, where, you see, Vladimir Putin “moved European borders” (this is a quote); the second direction is Syria. It turns out that Russia is “aggressively” there too. Borders, it seems, does not move; mows CABs, OFABs BetaB terrorist scum, however, according to the "times expert", this is also an act of aggression, because "moderate suffer". Well, the very modest of the American, Saudi and other armaments delivered through the territory of Turkey and other neighboring Syria use it not only against government forces (troops of the legitimate president and the SAR cabinet), but also against civilians of the long-suffering Syrian state.

So, the British "expert" in his material more than half a year ago outlined the "general line of the party", on the basis of which "Russia is aggressively behaving in the Arctic." And, as usual, the coverage of this “general line” continues today. Particularly zealous are foreign media, which over the years have received funding from financial and political centers, whose existence is based on attempts to contain Russia and all those who do not fit into the architecture of the aforementioned “general line”.

Over the past few months, literally hundreds of articles have appeared in Western editions of various scales that it is imperative to set a barrier in relation to Russia in the Arctic. This barrier is the deployment of the NATO contingent in the Arctic sectors of the “responsibility of the North Atlantic Alliance”. The initiative of NATO itself comes down to the need to conduct systematic exercises in the Arctic region. And taking into account the fact that for some time now it’s rather foolish to argue such ideas of “North Korean” or “Iranian” threats, the justifications are sometimes given entirely exotic. As an example, "environmental safety in the Arctic region." Apparently, it is necessary to understand that, in addition to NATO “white angels”, there is no one to undertake the ecology in the Arctic. Even Greenpeace is out of work ... Against the background of such arguments, even the “Iranian threat” looks more plausible from the standpoint of NATO logic - for those who are ready, excuse me, “give up” such nonsense.

In general, if you believe the information published in the Western media, it turns out that the next flight phase of the NATO “doves of peace” is coming - now from the western borders of Russia (from the Baltic states) towards the Arctic latitudes. True, we must pay tribute to the old McCain, who cares about the "doves of the world". The US senator wonders if these “pigeons” will have enough “plumage” to try to expose the Russians to any barriers in the harsh latitudes of the Arctic? Will there be enough training and suitable military equipment to “watch over the environment” where for the NATO thermophilic members the word “fox” is not only an animal ... Note that this is not our “hats”, as one might think, but real questions at real meetings in the US Senate from the aforementioned arms committee officer shot down over Falcon Vietnam, John McCain.

The journalists decided to inquire about the statements about the need for the NATO military presence at the head of the Russian Foreign Ministry Sergey Lavrov. Sergei Viktorovich noted that with questions about NATO concerns and concerns it would be better to contact the very concerned NATO. However, I decided to concretize the official Russian position on this issue.

According to the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia, in the Arctic at the moment there are simply no problems that could somehow hint at the need for the presence of the NATO military contingent.

Sergey Lavrov quotes RIA News:
NATO exercises, and analysis from time to time mentions that the military factor in the Arctic will grow, as the struggle for resources intensifies. We firmly believe that there are no such problems in the Arctic that require the participation of NATO.


That is, the West has been sent a signal that Russia has its own environmentalists (and, if you will, the “environmentalists”), who will deal with the environment in the Arctic professionally without the intervention of those who have already “ecologically” spoiled from Yugoslavia and Afghanistan to Iraq and Libya.

So why, forgive the term, the West is frantic? Yes, if only because the words of McCain about the backwardness of the Western Arctic programs (including the military) from the Russian - is not an empty phrase. First: Russia's energy projects, which, given the optimal prices for hydrocarbons and the real implementation of new oil and gas transportation routes, look very promising. Second, the possibility of investment in the Northern Sea Route, whose potential in terms of transport alternatives to the East Asia-Western Europe exchange of goods is enormous. And finally, the third: the development of military infrastructure in the Arctic reduces to zero the effectiveness of any missile defense segment that is open or in preparation for opening in Eastern Europe. And it is precisely the inevitability of the Russian "otvetki" that the American "partners" want to "bury" and bring them to a white-hot condition.

Russian activity in the Arctic as a nightmare for the West

Trolling from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation: "Galician" takes part in the construction of the military town "Arctic Trefoil"



Interestingly, the appearance of whom exactly to expect in the Arctic latitudes first? - NATO soldiers during the "environmental" exercises, a branch of the radio station "Arctic. Reality" or the human rights organization "Amnesty International of the Peoples of the Arctic" ...
Author:
Photos used:
V.Serga / Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, www.korabli.eu
122 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Teberii
    Teberii 5 July 2016 05: 55
    +10
    Yes, Russia is also aggressive in the Crimea, in the Baltic states and in the Arctic.
    1. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 5 July 2016 05: 59
      +46
      We are just returning our ... Time to collect stones.
      1. Knowing
        Knowing 5 July 2016 06: 50
        +17
        Quote: dmi.pris
        . Time to collect stones.

        We have collected enough stones, the time has come and we are scattering quietly. That’s why there’s hysteria throughout the DEMONocratic soda.
        1. Temples
          Temples 5 July 2016 07: 21
          -67%
          Launching the Arctic nuclear submarine!

          Who will tell you what kind of performance it was?

          We have blown through all kinds of media, that here it is ARCTIC! Atomic icebreaker giant!
          And on you lower body. Around a thousand people, reporters, journalists.

          Further, what will also illuminate the construction of a propeller for a ship?

          Or buying paint to paint a future ship?

          Why was this pathos needed?
          Fraud.

          Report on preparedness.
          Fuck a goat button accordion?
          Or who customized?
          What was the reason for this?

          We have created the largest nuclear powered ship !!!!!!!!
          Only it is still a big trough ...

          And then they say that the leadership of the Baltic Fleet gave the wrong information for which it was withdrawn.

          And in this case, everything is true ????????
          The Arctic nuclear-powered icebreaker was launched on June 16.
          All right trumpeted the country ???
          1. Monarchist
            Monarchist 5 July 2016 07: 45
            -20%
            Field Marshal, I don’t understand what should be noted: launching or commissioning?
            1. unsinkable
              unsinkable 5 July 2016 20: 29
              +7
              Quote: Monarchist
              what should be noted:

              Everything needs to be noted, always and everywhere. drinks
            2. Nick
              Nick 6 July 2016 10: 50
              +4
              Quote: Monarchist
              Field Marshal, I don’t understand what should be noted: launching or commissioning?

              Quote: Monarchist
              Who will tell you what kind of performance it was?

              We have blown through all kinds of media, that here it is ARCTIC! Atomic icebreaker giant!
              And on you lower body. Around a thousand people, reporters, journalists.

              Further, what will also illuminate the construction of a propeller for a ship?

              Or buying paint to paint a future ship?

              Why was this pathos needed?

              The launching of the ship is a significant event in the life of the ship and the workdays of shipbuilders.
              After the descent, the construction of the ship sometimes continues for years. The point here, most likely, is that at the time of launching the vessel passes from one environment to another, falling into its native element.
              The launching of the vessel unambiguously corresponds to the year, day and hour. That is why the descent was solemnly celebrated in shipbuilding for all centuries. Initially, the celebrations were of a religious rite. Then all the religious things were weathered, and the original “rite of baptism” remained. And today, during the descent, the “godmother”, as a rule, a woman in the presence of a large number of witnesses smashes a traditional bottle of champagne on the side of the ship.

              In a word, the old tradition is such - celebrate the descent ALREADY Ship on the water hi
          2. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 5 July 2016 08: 18
            +32
            Quote: Temples

            We have blown through all kinds of media, that here it is ARCTIC! Atomic icebreaker giant!
            And on you lower body. Around a thousand people, reporters, journalists.

            And why not. What is so strange is your hysteria. That yelling that there are no new ships, are now unhappy that they are launching a new icebreaker. Do you need something ????
            1. Yars
              Yars 5 July 2016 10: 42
              +15
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Quote: Temples

              We have blown through all kinds of media, that here it is ARCTIC! Atomic icebreaker giant!
              And on you lower body. Around a thousand people, reporters, journalists.

              And why not. What is so strange is your hysteria. That yelling that there are no new ships, are now unhappy that they are launching a new icebreaker. Do you need something ????

              they need to discriminate against the current government, "all the disappeared"
              1. Temples
                Temples 5 July 2016 17: 24
                -16%
                And why not. What a strange tantrum you have. That yelling that there are no new ships,


                Alexander, you turn to the mirror with these words.

                Hysteria apparently you.

                I never yelled that there are no new ships.

                It is funny to me from launching the biggest trough in our country.
                The hateful west of a larger trough launches each year with one small difference:
                - they are all ready for operation.
                they need to discriminate against the current government, "all the disappeared"


                There’s nothing to comment on.
                To Lavrov, he said everything.
                1. bk316
                  bk316 5 July 2016 19: 29
                  +12
                  Quote: Temples
                  The hateful west of a larger trough launches each year with one small difference:
                  - they are all ready for operation.


                  What does the "West" launch every year on a ready-to-operate nuclear icebreaker?
                  Then there should be hundreds of them ... oh horror!

                  Мarshal yes you rave! Only Russia has nuclear icebreakers. Well, there are no them in your "west", no matter how you would like it.
                2. KaraBumer
                  KaraBumer 6 July 2016 07: 52
                  +3
                  We must honor the marine traditions! And so - you can laugh from all the builders of the world !!!
                3. bogdan4ik
                  bogdan4ik 6 July 2016 08: 51
                  +3
                  You are uneducated. Launching the ship means that the most technologically advanced and important part of the ship is ready and launching confirms this. The hull of the ship, like the wings of an airplane - does not work with this, which means there is no ship or plane. Or do you propose to write in the body of everything, launch it into the water and everything will drown. Is that right?
                4. Nick
                  Nick 6 July 2016 11: 31
                  +2
                  Quote: Temples
                  It is funny to me from launching the biggest trough in our country.
                  The hateful west of a larger trough launches each year with one small difference:
                  - they are all ready for operation.

                  Your categorization only speaks of your limited knowledge in the field of world shipbuilding.
                  Here is the Associated Press post from 10.11. 2013 of the year.
                  "The newest American nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, Gerald Ford, has been launched, reports the Associated Press." The launching ceremony took place on Saturday, November 9, at the Newport News shipyard in virginia. The traditional stage of such ceremonies - breaking a bottle of champagne on the side of the ship - was entrusted to Susan Ford Bales, daughter of the 38 president of the United States, whose name was given to the aircraft carrier.

                  Construction work on the Gerald Ford aircraft carrier is now 70 percent complete, US Navy officials said. The ship is planned to be fully completed by 2015, after which the aircraft carrier will have to undergo a series of sea trials. Gerald Ford is expected to join the US Navy in 2016. "
          3. Vladimir Anatolyevich
            Vladimir Anatolyevich 5 July 2016 08: 58
            +27
            It's simple. The work on the slipway has been completed. Lowered from the slipway -> the slipway is empty -> you can lay a new ship. Follow the news.
            They launched into the water, solemnly celebrated. The rest of the work will be redistributed in the dock. And then another sea trials, acceptance, and much more ... until the moment when the Arctic icebreaker appears in the icebreaker flotilla.
            1. Alexey T. (Oper)
              Alexey T. (Oper) 5 July 2016 13: 53
              +12
              Quote: Vladimir Anatolyevich
              It's simple. The work on the slipway has been completed. Lowered from the slipway -> the slipway is empty -> you can lay a new ship. Follow the news.

              The second icebreaker of the same series has already been laid down. I was on the descent of the "Arctic", part of the hull of the second icebreaker has already been assembled. It can be seen even in the photo - in the perspective, a piece of the hull of the second icebreaker sticks out between the crane and the side.
            2. Alexey T. (Oper)
              Alexey T. (Oper) 5 July 2016 13: 55
              +6
              Quote: Vladimir Anatolyevich
              The rest of the work will be redistributed in the dock.

              Not at the dock. At the factory wall (at the pier) is being completed.
          4. evge-malyshev
            evge-malyshev 5 July 2016 09: 32
            +23
            Quote: Temples
            Launching the Arctic nuclear submarine!

            Who will tell you what kind of performance it was?


            I'll try to tell you. Launching of a ship under construction by shipbuilders has always been a CEREMONY. In this case, ornichnost, I consider it inappropriate.
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 5 July 2016 09: 45
              +14
              Quote: evge-malyshev
              . In this case, turfing, I consider inappropriate.

              Yes, what jerking, just for those who constantly yell that Putinslil, such news causes a gag reflex. They write every day that the country is over, in a week, and then the news comes out. They become nervous, all their commentaries are dust.
              1. Yars
                Yars 5 July 2016 10: 50
                +3
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Quote: evge-malyshev
                . In this case, turfing, I consider inappropriate.

                Yes, what jerking, just for those who constantly yell that Putinslil, such news causes a gag reflex. They write every day that the country is over, in a week, and then the news comes out. They become nervous, all their commentaries are dust.

                I am personally amazed at how people like them are "all-out", such shoulder straps are recruited here, they probably walk in a herd, or use bots. Here's a recent thread about a new aircraft carrier -
                https://topwar.ru/97518-novosti-rossiyskoy-avianosnoy-programmy.html#comment-id-
                6034506
                judging by the comments, too, only a dream that does not come true!
                1. Temples
                  Temples 5 July 2016 17: 32
                  -11%
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  Yes, what ernism, just those who constantly yelling that Putin


                  Yes, sir, you won’t get away either)))
                  Do you like hanging labels?

                  Can in childhood who offended?

                  Start with a half turn.
                  Or take off.

                  You give me an example from the Soviet past or earlier from the Russian.
                  When they celebrated and shouted to the whole world that they built feed for the ship ???

                  And you get too angry and blow bubbles.

                  Is it easier to be a repeater?
                  1. Temples
                    Temples 5 July 2016 17: 36
                    -11%
                    Quote: evge-malyshev
                    Launching of a ship under construction by shipbuilders has always been a CEREMONY.


                    One detail with your permission:

                    Launching a BUILDED vessel.

                    Just a maaaaaalenky amendment.
                    And the rest, say everything correctly.

                    Or is there an example of celebrations according to your scenario?
                    1. Alexey T. (Oper)
                      Alexey T. (Oper) 5 July 2016 19: 29
                      +8
                      Quote: Temples
                      One detail with your permission:

                      Launching a BUILDED vessel.

                      Just a maaaaaalenky amendment.

                      Here is a photo of the launch of the battleship "Izmail"



                      Here is a similar photograph of the descent of the battleship "Petropavlovsk"



                      Here is a photo of the descent of the Italian battleship "Giulio Caesare"



                      Here is the descent of the Bismarck



                      Enough to understand that they are lowering the hull first, and building large ships already at the factory wall?
                      1. Temples
                        Temples 6 July 2016 07: 30
                        -7
                        Quote: YARS
                        I am personally amazed at how people like them are "all-out", such shoulder straps are recruited here, they probably walk in a herd, or use bots.


                        Sir, you are funny.

                        Do you really care about painted epaulettes?

                        Start saying what you think and everything will change.

                        And the desire to please others is the path to poor mind.

                        You are not a herd. You are repeaters. Repeat other people's thoughts.

                        All the best to you.
                      2. Nirag013
                        Nirag013 6 July 2016 12: 13
                        +1
                        So ALL ships are launched (and always!), And not just large ones. And the comrade is absolutely incompetent in this and is trying to pass off his fabrications / ideas as reality. Therefore, you will NOT convince him with any photographs. Do you want me to predict that he will object to you? He will tell you that it was a god news when it was archaic and anachronism and they don’t do it now. But the funniest thing is exactly what they are doing now. And, most likely, they will continue to do so, as occupy a slipway for a year or two, until everything is completely completed, no one can afford such luxury. Yes, and not every slipway / slip the weight of a fully finished vessel can withstand.
                    2. sq
                      sq 5 July 2016 21: 37
                      +2
                      Your comments on this topic or aggressive ignorance at the level of "vyshyvanka" from a remote Carpathian farm, or a provocation.
                      What it means
                      Quote: Temples
                      Launching a BUILDED vessel.
                      In your? I am very far from shipbuilding, but even in fiction the launching of the Hull is indicated, and not a ship completely ready to go to sea.
                    3. Nirag013
                      Nirag013 6 July 2016 11: 48
                      +1
                      The vessel is launched entirely into the water when it is a very small and simple boat or something similar. Then - yes, one hundred percent readiness of the vessel on the slipway is possible. Any more or less respectable ship leaves the slipway when the hull is fully formed and (if the production conditions, for example, crane height allow) the superstructure, the propeller-rudder complex and the main systems of the ship are mounted. Everything else is being completed afloat, at the outfitting pier. This is a generally accepted world practice. You have been repeatedly told about this in the comments. And you keep on hysteria - "Ah! Everything is lost! Only the body was lowered!" And this is exactly what they do EVERYWHERE, at least where I worked - in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Spain, the Netherlands. For example (if I'm not an authority for you) - read about the construction (namely, the process itself) of the well-known "Mistrals" in Saint-Nazaire. You will learn a lot of new and interesting things for yourself. And - yes, everywhere the descent of the ship from the slipway (in your terminology - the hull) is a holiday.
                      PS: For reference, in shipbuilding \ ship repair I have been working for 27 years.
                    4. Nirag013
                      Nirag013 6 July 2016 11: 54
                      +2
                      The vessel is launched entirely into the water when it is a very small and simple boat or something similar. Then - yes, one hundred percent readiness of the vessel on the slipway is possible. Any more or less respectable ship leaves the slipway when the hull is fully formed and (if the production conditions, for example, crane height allow) the superstructure, the propeller-rudder complex and the main systems of the ship are mounted. Everything else is being completed afloat, at the outfitting pier. This is a generally accepted world practice. You have been repeatedly told about this in the comments. And you keep on hysteria - "Ah! Everything is lost! Only the body was lowered!" And this is exactly what they do EVERYWHERE, at least where I worked - in Finland, Sweden, Norway, Spain, the Netherlands. For example (if I'm not an authority for you) - read about the construction (namely, the process itself) of the well-known "Mistrals" in Saint-Nazaire. You will learn many new and interesting things for yourself. And - yes, everywhere the descent of the ship from the slipway (in your terminology - the hull) is a holiday.
                      PS: For reference, in shipbuilding \ ship repair I have been working for 27 years.
                      Quote: Temples
                      One detail with your permission:

                      Launching a BUILDED vessel.

                      Just a maaaaaalenky amendment.
                      And the rest, say everything correctly.
            2. Talgat
              Talgat 5 July 2016 16: 33
              +3
              Quote: evge-malyshev
              jerking, I think inappropriate


              I will support evge-malyshev

              and add another argument. The descent of the ship is one thing - but there is another side of the front.
              We all understand that an information war is being waged - and underestimating it is mortally dangerous. This war is fought even here - right on this site and around the internet

              If you can use it as an excuse for positive news, then why not. And when they are put into operation, why not give positive news again? If the West does not disdain anything - then why not the Russian Federation to use all the techniques of the info-war
          5. 73bor
            73bor 5 July 2016 09: 52
            +24
            I was on the descent and your squeals about the anxiety of the event are stupid, the descent of the ships has always been an event for shipbuilders, but as your tongue turned to call it a trough, this is a full-fledged ship with a power plant of 70% readiness!
            1. Alexey T. (Oper)
              Alexey T. (Oper) 5 July 2016 14: 00
              +4
              Quote: 73bor
              I was on the descent

              I was also on the descent (my wife works at the Baltic plant, in mechanical engineering).
              Which board were they on? My department and I stood on the port side between the cranes, about 20 meters from the aft section.

              Most of all I was surprised that such a colossus (it was really closing the board over the sky) got off almost silently, slipping like butter.

              By the way, the wife dropped the official factory video of the descent, have not you seen? From copters it looks generally great, the panorama is simply grandiose.
          6. unsinkable
            unsinkable 5 July 2016 20: 26
            0
            Quote: Temples
            Who will tell you what kind of performance it was?

            Whose question is your question.
            Quote: Temples
            Launching the Arctic nuclear submarine!

            Whose answer is your question? Your answer is your question. You are well pleased for the former leadership of the Baltic Fleet. Or maybe you are a drunkard. (You intentionally).
          7. Cat
            Cat 5 July 2016 21: 24
            +2
            Maybe I will surprise you, but in the Navy it is customary to cover the following events:
            1. Bookmark the ship.
            2. Launching the ship.
            3. Commissioning.
            Tradition however! And since the time of Peter I.
            It is possible to argue for a long time who borrowed from whom and what, but sailors are superstitious people and are conservative in matters of tradition. Perhaps the profession obliges ... They know better what is needed and what is more important. They will figure it out without us.
            And the last one. The icebreaker was lowered from the slipways - lowered. They will finish building on the water - they will finish building. Sea trials will be conducted and the ship will go into operation. All that remains for the new icebreaker is to wish seven pounds under the keel!
          8. midivan
            midivan 5 July 2016 22: 12
            +1
            Launching the Arctic nuclear submarine!

            Who will tell you what kind of performance it was?
            "echo" will tell you lol look, I’m opening Yandex right now, in the second line-Komoedov: 36 Baltic Fleet officers have been removed and a criminal case has been opened .., then I open the news in the very top - Echo of Moscow

            21:02
            Some details of the board of the Ministry of Defense became known, which the situation at the Baltic Fleet was sorted out ............... we open the first com -tramdaks
            05 July 2016 | 21: 08
            So there are some troughs, what is the combat readiness ??? And against whom /? There are all NATO countries there. And the Russian fleet does not dance against them. And the rear support has been stolen for a long time, even if it was
            you're just not looking there wink lol
          9. kadcin-max
            kadcin-max 6 July 2016 01: 23
            0
            Actually, in this "trough", as you put it, there are two nuclear reactors !!! If you don't understand anything in shipbuilding, then just keep quiet ...
          10. dima mzk
            dima mzk 7 July 2016 04: 19
            0
            no one said that it was put into operation, there the completion will be on the water, there the commissioning will be in 2017, the end of the year, the old one will go and it will go to change sneakers))) which goat is buttoned, the more so such huge ships always bring to the water readiness, and launching is a significant event for the plant staff. what a damn screw there are nuclear reactors with 3 screws already standing, this is not a rubber boat so
        2. DIMA45R
          DIMA45R 5 July 2016 07: 24
          +8
          The consistent thoughtful development of Russia infuriates Western countries because of their helplessness to transcend, repeat or hinder this process ...
          These are strategic tasks that require time in any case, and if we begin to move, let’s say Western countries will be far behind tomorrow, but tomorrow no one will begin to build icebreakers, spaceports, Arctic towns ...
          1. Temples
            Temples 5 July 2016 07: 42
            -42%
            and starting to move let's say tomorrow in this direction the Western countries will be far behind


            This lag behind France, Germany, Italy, Israel, Spain is especially worrying.
            The Arctic coast of these western countries is currently in complete desolation.
            The governments of these countries are ready to resign, recognizing the fact of their backlog in the Arctic

            But they promise to "start moving, let's say tomorrow"

            Lord turn on the brain!
            You do not need all to fit one comb.
            I understand your fierce hatred of the West, but there is a reason!

            Otherwise, get rid of iPhones and other gadgets from Western countries that hate and shamefully lag behind in the Arctic.

            How far has Russia advanced in the development of the Mediterranean coast?
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 5 July 2016 08: 19
              +17
              Quote: Temples

              How far has Russia advanced in the development of the Mediterranean coast?

              Sometimes it's better to be silent than to speak!
              1. Paranoid50
                Paranoid50 5 July 2016 10: 42
                +11
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Sometimes it's better to be silent than to speak!

                Yes, okay, namesake, let them talk. Sometimes such logical labyrinths are built, that without noticing it, they disappear into them ... the last one is eaten up without salt, for the "anti-popular" government puts everything into service, and the rest into its pocket ... However, logic, sir! Well, okay, an objective opinion is made up of many subjective ones. Something like this. hi
                1. unsinkable
                  unsinkable 5 July 2016 20: 43
                  0
                  Quote: Paranoid50
                  , objective opinion consists of many subjective.

                  Excellent! Calmly and logically put the winning point. hi
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. evge-malyshev
              evge-malyshev 5 July 2016 09: 38
              +3
              Quote: Temples
              Otherwise, get rid of iPhones and other gadgets from Western countries that hate and shamefully lag behind in the Arctic.


              Do not confuse God's gift with fried eggs.
            4. 73bor
              73bor 5 July 2016 10: 01
              +9
              If you think that the presence of iPhones and supercars is a technological advantage, then you are quite limited, by the way, if there weren’t any Russian developments, there wouldn’t be an iPhone, and the development of the Arctic for Russia is vital, and believe me, not only gadgets are alive in the country, even countries like France, Germany and the USA are simply not able to produce much, but we are ahead of the nuclear fleet!
            5. Orionvit
              Orionvit 5 July 2016 16: 43
              +5
              How far has Russia advanced in the development of the Mediterranean coast?
              You really. or pretend to be? It is true that half of the Arctic is Russia, the other half is Canada and the United States. Well, let them unwind there, there’s nothing to climb into someone else’s garden. The question is different. Everything that Russia does (it doesn’t matter, in the Arctic or elsewhere), causes an acute negative reaction of the entire Western world, because any successes in Russia are nearing the end of the West. Russia doesn’t need someone else’s; The West itself will be bent (we are already observing), this is what infuriates them.
            6. unsinkable
              unsinkable 5 July 2016 20: 40
              0
              Quote: Temples
              I understand your fierce hatred of the West, but there is a reason!

              Went west! negative
        3. GYGOLA
          GYGOLA 5 July 2016 10: 42
          +1
          They will annoy with hysteria, "boilers in the holes" and to the Urals, there are mountains, air, picturesque places. smile
      2. Kostyar
        Kostyar 5 July 2016 07: 13
        +4
        Interestingly, the appearance of whom exactly to expect in the Arctic latitudes first? - NATO soldiers during the "environmental" exercises, a branch of the radio station "Arctic. Reality" or the human rights organization "Amnesty International of the Peoples of the Arctic" ...

        Ah, whoever would come, we will meet all at the highest level .......
        A dirty tarpaulin boot for their NATO cunning face, always on fox !!!
      3. Tulip
        Tulip 5 July 2016 10: 50
        +8
        They are not indignant at our expansion; they are indignant that we are simply restoring what was ours and what they so lovingly destroyed.
      4. kamikaze
        kamikaze 5 July 2016 17: 05
        +1
        Euro-barking and RUSSIA RETURNING TO THE ARTIK
    2. Skif83
      Skif83 5 July 2016 10: 43
      +2
      Everything Russia does in своих interests - aggression from the point of view of "partners".
      Another interesting thing: -
      ... with regard to Russia in the Arctic, it is imperative to put up a barrier. This barrier is the deployment of the NATO contingent in the Arctic sectors of the “responsibility of the North Atlantic Alliance”. The initiative of NATO itself boils down to the need for systematic exercises in the Arctic region.
      .
      And which of them will withstand something in the Arctic?
      Is it that the American Aleuts? It would be interesting to see this wassat
  2. Knowing
    Knowing 5 July 2016 05: 55
    +14
    It’s just necessary to increase the frequency meetings of the Ministry of Defense on the restoration of military infrastructure in the Arctic region with the widest possible coverage throughout the Anglo-Saxon group through video reports from both the meeting places and so especially important from territories OUR, RUSSIAN bases in the Arctic! McCain will quickly bend ..., and he is not alone ... repeat
    1. Monarchist
      Monarchist 5 July 2016 07: 49
      +3
      What a "villain" you are, but in general, if it bends, it will only benefit people
  3. aszzz888
    aszzz888 5 July 2016 05: 57
    +4
    The Arctic is our shield. And how we will exhibit it, our power depends.
  4. Coconut
    Coconut 5 July 2016 06: 01
    +18
    Quote: Teberii
    Yes, Russia is also aggressive in the Crimea, in the Baltic states and in the Arctic.

    Oh .. the gods wake up next to the Russian .. I go to the kitchen and there are Russians and I look in horror in the mirror and there he is Russian .. where are they from then devatso ?! tongue
    1. drunkram
      drunkram 5 July 2016 06: 27
      +2
      this situation is now in Ukraine
      1. dmi.pris
        dmi.pris 5 July 2016 06: 35
        +1
        What? When you look in the mirror? Actually, an article about the Russian Arctic .. Already got with this country
        Quote: drunkram
        this situation is now in Ukraine
        1. drunkram
          drunkram 5 July 2016 06: 40
          +1
          you disappoint me - I talked about the fact that in the country U, as you said, Putin’s agents are found in every corner, as well as in the Baltic states. Already silent about the Swedes with their submarines
          1. dmi.pris
            dmi.pris 5 July 2016 07: 21
            0
            Well, say it directly, but not abstractly, they say. Quote: This is the situation in Ukraine .. Once again I say write on the merits of the article, and there is nowhere to go about the topic.
            Quote: drunkram
            you disappoint me - I talked about the fact that in the country U, as you said, Putin’s agents are found in every corner, as well as in the Baltic states. Already silent about the Swedes with their submarines
          2. the villain
            the villain 6 July 2016 11: 37
            +1
            Quote: drunkram
            Already silent about the Swedes with their submarines

            So the Swedes, like, really found the Russian submarine ... which sank even during the First World War.
  5. demchuk.ig
    demchuk.ig 5 July 2016 06: 01
    +4
    May all these Makeyna-Russia and the Arctic get used to this whole! This is all ours!
  6. Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 5 July 2016 06: 04
    +13
    I am glad how to build the base. When he served in Chukotka everything was more primitive and more difficult. At the far points of the RTV-shnikov it’s really hard. There was even such a joke:
    A helicopter is driven by a green lieutenant to the Red Yaranga point. Hangs on 300, the pilot says - Jump! Lieutenant - What are you doing? Break up, let's lower! We went down to 200 - the same words, went down to 100 - Jump, otherwise, if you drop another couple of meters, they will start jumping from there!
    By the way, in the programs I did not see or hear anything about families. Are families supposed to be there?
    1. kolkulon
      kolkulon 5 July 2016 06: 29
      0
      It’s reported. The star was reporting. Sadik for sure. But the school, most likely a translation closer to civilization.
  7. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 5 July 2016 06: 08
    +5
    We firmly believe that there are no problems in the Arctic that require the participation of NATO.

    For example, I am firmly convinced that there is no place on Earth for NATO, created in opposition to the Warsaw Treaty, for it is no longer there.
    1. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 5 July 2016 07: 53
      +14
      NATO was created on April 4, 1949, the date of the signing of the Warsaw Pact is May 14, 1955 - so who "balanced" whom ?!
  8. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 5 July 2016 06: 14
    +9
    Acting in advance, this tactic of Russia brings its positive results. Which infuriates our opponents. It will cool the hot NATO guys dreaming of a global nuclear strike. The response will be inevitable.
  9. VICTOR-61
    VICTOR-61 5 July 2016 06: 23
    +2
    How they dislike that we are strengthening borders. But we are strengthening our borders that are so furious
  10. Amurets
    Amurets 5 July 2016 06: 41
    +4
    <<< I wonder who exactly to expect in the Arctic latitudes in the first place? - NATO soldiers during "environmental" exercises, a branch of the radio station "Arctic. Realii" or the human rights organization "International Amnesty of the Peoples of the Arctic Circle" ... >>>
    Aircraft carriers with birdhouses for the Gull Rose and insulated cages for the Polar Bears. They will also create a "Moderate opposition of walruses and seals."
    1. Monarchist
      Monarchist 5 July 2016 07: 55
      +2
      McCain will sue you: disclosure of classified information
  11. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 5 July 2016 06: 45
    +4
    John McCain is the one who is impressed by posing in front of camera lenses together with “bearded boys”, who later strangely become at the helm of international terrorist groups, each report on the Arctic of the main defense department of the Russian Federation takes to heart. So close that almost any comment it mr boils down to the American counterpart "delayed .. polymers."
    Accurate reduction good , (highlighted in bold) I agree with the author, that’s how it should be reduced in relation to McCain, because this is still a bad-smelling, brown substance!
  12. dobrik10
    dobrik10 5 July 2016 06: 46
    0
    Fur diapers have their teeth.
  13. Bramb
    Bramb 5 July 2016 06: 50
    +3
    The author was mistaken in terminology.
    We have no friends in the west. There are partners. These are fundamentally different things!

    And on the topic: somehow weakly Western partners are reacting. Where are the screams about the occupation? Where is the rally of polar bears against Russian aggression and occupation? Where are the walrus manifestations against Putin? No, this is not serious! It's even a shame somehow. Chopped nonche west. Chopped ...
    Well, at least throw a couple of our liberals there: let them rally there with banners! And what? Let your grants work out as expected.
    1. Monarchist
      Monarchist 5 July 2016 07: 56
      +1
      Gather soon, the issue is being worked out
    2. the villain
      the villain 6 July 2016 11: 46
      0
      Quote: Bramb
      Well, at least throw a couple of our liberals there: let them rally there with banners!

      Why is it just a couple? The more, the better ... And do not let go back !!! am
  14. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 5 July 2016 07: 10
    +5
    "Russia is aggressive in the Arctic"

    For NATO, Russia is being "aggressive" everywhere. It is necessary to somehow justify the very existence of this organization after the end of the Cold War. And here is how NATO fighters will explore the Arctic, if they refused to "fight" during exercises in Norway at a temperature of -6 and used diapers due to the lack of dry closets (REN TV).
  15. evil partisan
    evil partisan 5 July 2016 07: 21
    +5
    Penguins in the Arctic, NATO did not offer to save? Will be offered soon yes .
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 5 July 2016 08: 00
      +4
      Quote: Angry Guerrilla
      Penguins in the Arctic, NATO did not offer to save? Will be offered soon

      What are the plans for the acclimatization of penguins in the Arctic.?
      1. evil partisan
        evil partisan 5 July 2016 09: 09
        +1
        Quote: Amurets
        there are plans for the acclimatization of penguins in the Arctic.?

        If you, a colleague, undertake to finance this event winked, then yes. repeat
        1. Amurets
          Amurets 5 July 2016 11: 03
          +2
          Quote: Angry Guerrilla

          If you, a colleague, undertake to finance this event winked, then yes.

          Why an extra headache? The crowds of inspectors will come, To finance the acclimatization of penguins, there may be enough money, but to feed the auditors, the state bank will not be enough. If only the US Federal Reserve will bear the costs?
      2. the villain
        the villain 6 July 2016 11: 53
        0
        Quote: Amurets

        What are the plans for the acclimatization of penguins in the Arctic.?

        Laughter, laughing, but I would never be surprised if the "killer of the aircraft carrier" McCain, the fucking kite, says something like: "Look, to what the Russians have brought the Arctic, there are not even penguins left !!!" wassat
    2. Paranoid50
      Paranoid50 5 July 2016 08: 01
      +4
      It will become of them. Even if they (penguins) have to be brought from Antarctica for this (they are not found in the Arctic), well then start rescuing ... Or vice versa: declare the "bloody penguin regime" (in this case, polar bears) outlawed, well, it started , everything is according to the scheme ...
    3. family tree
      family tree 5 July 2016 08: 23
      +3
      Quote: Angry Guerrilla
      Penguins in the Arctic, NATO did not offer to save?

      And again, the test tube will be shown no matter how, as a stop-proof proof of the absence of penguin democracy in the Arctic
      Hi, how is it, behind the front line hi laughing
      1. evil partisan
        evil partisan 5 July 2016 09: 01
        +2
        Quote: perepilka
        like there, behind the front line

        Around the traitors. sad
        Hi, taiga power engineer! drinks
  16. Flinky
    Flinky 5 July 2016 07: 48
    +5
    Nata will not go into the Arctic. For diapers will immediately freeze to the eggs, and they will become ordinary brainworms.
  17. Arkan
    Arkan 5 July 2016 07: 55
    0
    Hegemon in a panic! The Russians have returned to their North! Now their soft power, with the help of which they, Norway, Denmark and their overlords, tried to take away our wealth, turns into a soft guano. All talk about, it is necessary to share, India, China, turn into blah, blah, blah ....
  18. family tree
    family tree 5 July 2016 08: 10
    +7
    Trolling from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation: "Galician" takes part in the construction of the military town "Arctic Trefoil"

    Well, wait a minute svidomye Zaorut laughing although the city of Galich, in the Kostroma province, well, doesn’t stand next to Galicia request
    1. Stirbjorn
      Stirbjorn 5 July 2016 12: 47
      +1
      Quote: perepilka
      Well, wait a minute svidomye zaorut supposedly zrad although the city of Galich, in the Kostroma province, well, there is no side to Galicia

      judging by the post, the author himself is not aware of Galich, otherwise I do not understand, where does trolling
  19. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 5 July 2016 08: 40
    +6
    Judging by the abundance and degree of comments from our potential "friends" ... Russia is doing everything right ...
    They laid eyes on the Northern Sea Route and the region’s natural resources a long time ago ... in the 90s did a lot for our departure from the Arctic ... abandoning the Russian (Soviet) sector of the Arctic and curtailing our presence ... and now Russia is returning in a new quality. .. updated and ready for new challenges in this important region ...
  20. S_Baykala
    S_Baykala 5 July 2016 08: 48
    +8
    In the state army, the vast majority of blacks and Latinos. They want to send them to the Arctic - a huge flag in their hands! Blacks in the Arctic: the best joke of the year. good
  21. qwert111
    qwert111 5 July 2016 09: 03
    +5
    We have "good" partners, so if we lived in dugouts in which torches would burn and the light would get a pebble on a pebble hitting, then they would feel calm, but here we lower ships, climb into the Arctic. I just want to say to our "partners" that the time to pull apart and humiliate Russia has passed and I hope forever, and you gentlemen "partners" have a perspective, as in the following joke:

    "Loss farm. Animals have gathered in the barnyard and discuss their fate.
    Cows say: “You have to leave here while you are safe.” The barn’s roof is thin, it floods with rain.
    Horses: - There is no normal food, the straw is all rot. It’s impossible to live on like this, you need to wander.
    Other animals: - Yes, yes, we’re leaving, how much can you endure ?! Gathered and went.
    The ball sits in place.
    Everyone asks him: - Why are you sitting? Go with us.
    Ball: - No, I have a prospect here!
    Animals: - What is the prospect? You will die of hunger here.
    Ball: - Nooooo, I have a prospect here!
    Animals: - Well, what is the prospect? There is nothing here! Get sick and die ...
    Ball: - I won’t go. He said, I have a prospect here!
    Animals: —What is the prospect?
    Sharik: - I heard the hostess of the Khoyain say: “... if things continue like this, then we will suck Sharik all winter ...”
  22. dojjdik
    dojjdik 5 July 2016 09: 17
    +1
    than throwing the loot for the exploration of Mars, it’s better to use the same space technologies to build bases on your land and incomes will be much higher, which makes Jews furious
  23. Nelepost
    Nelepost 5 July 2016 09: 34
    -4
    Recently I talked with a friend who is taking part in the construction of this icebreaker, according to him, they should have finished building it for another week, if not more, before launching, but the launch date was determined and they were in every possible way "stimulated" to work on night shifts in recent days. What's the bottom line? With pomp and shouts of "Hurray for Russia!" from normal projects we build in a hurry something so that at least somehow it worked.
    1. Baikal
      Baikal 5 July 2016 15: 35
      +1
      Well, show the places where they work differently) Or at least countries laughing
    2. Alexey T. (Oper)
      Alexey T. (Oper) 5 July 2016 15: 54
      +3
      Some nonsense drove you comrade. Or are you chasing us here. My wife participated in the construction of this icebreaker (ordered screws). It should have been let down on May 26, just on my birthday. We didn’t have time, so the descent was first transferred to 6 of June, and then not to 16.
  24. atamankko
    atamankko 5 July 2016 09: 34
    +1
    The Arctic will thank Russia for its love and care.
  25. Potter
    Potter 5 July 2016 09: 51
    +3
    rolling from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation: "Galician" takes part in the construction of the military city "Arctic Trefoil"
    Galician cranes are manufactured in the city of Galich, Kostroma region. Ancient city, ancient name,
    (dr. Russian. Galich Mersky) - a city since 1159). Shows our Slavic kinship, once former.
    1. Vladimir61
      Vladimir61 5 July 2016 10: 20
      0
      The languages ​​\ uXNUMXb \ uXNUMXbof the patriots are coming out - the truck crane "Galichanin" and in Russia! Who will look where the name comes from.
      And yesterday on "24" the travel agency was shown where on the walls the protective strip from the impact of the backs of the chairs is painted blue and yellow! Ukraine is coming ...
  26. DIMbor
    DIMbor 5 July 2016 10: 00
    -2
    In the last photo, the roof of the building does not resemble anything. And so I read the article with interest.
  27. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 5 July 2016 10: 02
    +2
    Quote: Paranoid50
    NATO was created on April 4, 1949, the date of the signing of the Warsaw Pact is May 14, 1955 - so who "balanced" whom ?!

    NATO was originally created on April 4 1949 of the year in the United States, to protect Europe from Soviet influenceThe Warsaw Pact is for containing it. There is no Soviet influence today, just as there is no Warsaw Pact, so who is it balancing today? What has changed in essence, I apologize for the somewhat incorrect wording.
  28. evge-malyshev
    evge-malyshev 5 July 2016 10: 45
    +2
    The spherical track "Spitsbergen - North Pole - Cape Dezhnev" is Russian. There is nothing to do there for NATO and the EU.
  29. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 5 July 2016 10: 47
    0
    Quote: Vladimir61
    And yesterday on "24" the travel agency was shown where on the walls the protective strip from the impact of the backs of the chairs is painted blue and yellow! Ukraine is coming ...

    And we have that the Ukrainian flag is prohibited? And two stripes in the colors of this flag on the conscience of the designer and nothing more.
  30. kirgudu
    kirgudu 5 July 2016 10: 48
    0
    Ours are preparing to melt the cover of the Arctic Ocean, it seems.
  31. Siberia 9444
    Siberia 9444 5 July 2016 10: 50
    +4
    Build military icebreakers and spit west! There will still be a squeal laughing
  32. DimerVladimer
    DimerVladimer 5 July 2016 11: 44
    +4
    :) Do you know the west? What is this nightmare for him?
    Woe to the writers - they have already completely drank their brains with their hysterical propaganda.
    1. Bering xnumx
      Bering xnumx 5 July 2016 23: 15
      0
      This is not propaganda. This desire to return the country and its greatness !!! Understand how you want
  33. SergF123
    SergF123 5 July 2016 12: 42
    +2
    Hmm, how would you live like that, so that you would not consider it aggressive ?!) What the country will not do, everything is against the West, even icebreakers and shovels are all weapons of the aggressor)))
  34. Tolik_74
    Tolik_74 5 July 2016 13: 05
    +2
    And what, excuse me, why the hell is McKain who John is so worried about the Russian troops entering the Arctic coast. Russia forces what, it introduces into p.i.ndo.s.iu or something, and in general, the American wayak there is closer than 500 km ordered. And if you want to get to know better the Caliber or the S-400, then you are welcome.
  35. morsikoff
    morsikoff 5 July 2016 13: 40
    +2
    They are furious. They are furious that Russia is returning.
    Russia is returning not only to the Arctic. Russia has returned to the Middle East, the Black Sea and the Mediterranean.
  36. Alexey T. (Oper)
    Alexey T. (Oper) 5 July 2016 13: 50
    +3
    Quote: Temples
    Launching the Arctic nuclear submarine!

    Who will tell you what kind of performance it was?

    The basis of any vessel is the hull and the power units and machines mounted in it. Launching the hull to the water means the vessel is ready for 75-80%. Then it is being completed already on the water.

    And the performance was really magnificent. I saw him live, I really liked it. Now, within a year, an icebreaker will be completed at the factory wall, they will load fuel and forward to the open spaces of the Arctic.

    And let the whole world envy. Since no one except us can build such machines anymore.

    Go Russia!
  37. Robin_bad
    Robin_bad 5 July 2016 14: 39
    +2
    I think the fight for the rights of polar bears will begin soon
  38. AdekvatNICK
    AdekvatNICK 5 July 2016 15: 13
    +2
    watch a movie about how it was built all this is very informative and interesting. There they don’t even kill bears and carefully drive them away from the construction site, and they do it slowly so that, God forbid, the beast does not die from running from overheating.
  39. afrikanez
    afrikanez 5 July 2016 15: 49
    +1
    Personally, I cannot imagine Russia without the Arctic. This is our territory, and how it could have been almost "lost" is not clear. Although it is understandable that the authorities are often only "liberals" who are ready to sell their own mother.
  40. Lyubopyatov
    Lyubopyatov 5 July 2016 17: 59
    +1
    Comrade Khramov, with his "God-chosen" hysteria, brought excessive turbulence into the conversation of sane people. Go to your own kind and do not muddy the clear waters of the Arctic.
  41. Brave Schweik
    Brave Schweik 5 July 2016 18: 17
    +1
    Gthtl Tell McCain that the Arctic is ours! And we will not concede its plankton to anyone!
  42. D. Dan
    D. Dan 5 July 2016 23: 04
    +1
    This thing, this fantastic building, a military camp, in my childhood I read science fiction about this, and now, THIS IS. In short, I am fucking hot!
  43. Bering xnumx
    Bering xnumx 5 July 2016 23: 07
    +1
    And Antarctica should not be forgotten. This is not a played card.
  44. Machete
    Machete 6 July 2016 00: 16
    +1
    A whole war will soon unfold over the Arctic. And it’s good that they have already joined the fight, ahead of many. The Arctic will still show what these or those countries are worth.
  45. Own
    Own 6 July 2016 08: 59
    0
    about trolling: Galichanin - not from Galicia, but from Galich (Kostroma region)
  46. Takashi
    Takashi 6 July 2016 12: 10
    0
    Why did the Russian Federation sharply remember the North?
    Just look at the South. The Western, Southern direction is densely packed with US bases, NATO. Moreover, in these areas in many countries the United States is deploying the first echelon of air defense (Patriot). And to change this - Russia is not able to. The eastern direction is China, Japan and the long way through the Pacific Ocean.
    To summarize: North is the shortest direction of fire to defeat the United States. The product will have time to gain height at which it is impossible to knock down or collide.
    that is why the Russian Federation has sharply rushed to restore its presence in the North. And mining in the North is just a way to stake out land, because with such a population and the level of economic development, we need the North as a "dog's 5th leg."
    1. duhmorey
      duhmorey 7 July 2016 00: 23
      -2
      You naive boy ... Jews, who own both the United States and Russia, will not shoot by themselves! Not for this they need a huge, not endangered "to go under water ..." territory that they have already captured and are clearing today of the Russian people in order to populate with slaves from other countries! And they themselves plan to become masters of the world as it is written in the Talmud, and in the Bible too))
      So read the primer dear, then I will take offsets ...))
  47. antivirus
    antivirus 6 July 2016 20: 02
    0
    Quote: dmi.pris
    We are just returning our ... Time to collect stones.

    We need bricklayers. and the "masons" in aprons.
    If this goes further: no one will clog the grounding peg (drove, etc.)
    All 30 years he was surprised at the noble surrender of his position in the world.
    Really, it was also hard (or even harder) to get out of the pit after the Crimean War and in the 20-30s (when they arrived in the Arctic),
    space is necessary for a swing-support and then a throw to the West-South.
  48. duhmorey
    duhmorey 7 July 2016 00: 18
    -1
    The Jewish government of Russians precisely collects "its own" ... as the Bible says: "everything that belongs to the goyim, as it were, is ownerless, and does not belong to anyone, and who of the Jews first took possession of that belongs ..." Our "brothers love everything To rake in someone else's, God commands them to do so! So the Arctic is not being mastered for the Russian people, do not open your mouth too much ... naive Russians ... how easy it is to deceive you, after all, I feel sorry for you))
  49. orlan912
    orlan912 7 July 2016 13: 27
    0
    This is our territory, and strategic. It would be ridiculous not to begin its development. I fully support the state’s policy regarding the presence of our troops there. A holy place is never empty .
  50. mvp
    mvp 7 July 2016 18: 25
    0
    I did not understand about "Galichanin". The crane has been and is being made in Russia. There is a city like Galich in the Kostroma region.