The guys from the backyard

11
Our potential allies in Asia at the opposite end of the Earth are sometimes closer than neighbors. Perhaps the fact is that the basis of relations with Asian countries is currently pure geopolitics, and with Latin American - mainly ideology.

This phenomenon originated long ago - in an era when the United States considered Latin America its “backyard”, that is, the undivided sphere of influence, and the USSR acted there through local leftist forces.

However, for a long time it seemed that the massive invasion of the left into the “backyard” of the USA was choking. The Communists took only Cuba, in 1979 they added Nicaragua, but they lost it even while the USSR was still alive. After the collapse of the latter in Washington, they were sure that the problem was resolved forever. Even Cuba will not go anywhere, Castro will die - she will automatically return to the "bosom of democracy." As a result, the "backyard" was simply forgotten. And it was a serious mistake in Washington.

The concept of the "backyard" has created in Latin America hatred of the "gringos", which is perhaps stronger than even in the Islamic world. This hatred is similar to Eastern European Russophobia. The experience of Americans as occupiers in the Middle East is essentially limited to eight years in Iraq alone, and in Latin America - a whole century throughout the continent. The fact that the occupation was often indirect, does not make much difference. The new Latin American socialism is implicated in this hatred.

Union vs Gringo

It is much more difficult for the States to fight it than in the Cold War years with the Soviet one, since it is not imposed, as in Eastern Europe, but is a reflection of the views of a significant part of the population of Latin American countries, therefore it is distributed in a completely democratic way. This is truly popular, largely Lumpen socialism with a huge admixture of nationalism. Moreover (with the exception of the Cuban variant) it does not imply absurd ideological restrictions in the everyday life of people and does not abolish market relations.

The guys from the backyardThe situation for Washington is aggravated by the fact that in the States themselves the share of Latin Americans (so-called Latinos) is growing rapidly. Until now, it seemed that there was no particular threat to the United States. They are more Europeanized, closer to Western culture and traditions than, for example, Middle Eastern and African migrants in Europe or Chinese in Russia. However, in connection with the new trends in the “soft underbelly” of the United States, it can be expected that a fair portion of the “Latinos” will become a kind of “fifth column” in the territory of the States.

The relations of modern Russia with the countries of Latin America are primarily political in nature, based on this very hatred of the “gringos,” that is, towards the United States. Moscow successfully uses the local leftists, who recently came to power in several countries for their own purposes. In particular, of the three states that, apart from Russia itself, recognized the independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, two are Latin American (Venezuela and Nicaragua). They, as well as Cuba, always support Russia against Georgia under the relevant UN resolutions. Of the ten states (again, not counting ours), which 27 in March 2014 of the year voted in the UN General Assembly against the resolution in support of the territorial integrity of Ukraine (meaning Crimea's entry into Russia), four represented Latin America (Cuba, Venezuela, Nicaragua, Bolivia ), despite the fact that there were only two of those from the CIS (Belarus and Armenia).

Accordingly, for Moscow, the Latin American left regimes represent a valuable political resource. But we appreciate any contacts with all Latin American countries, especially with the largest ones. And, for example, relations with Brazil are particularly important in the aspect of the development of the BRICS project, to which Moscow attaches extremely great political and propaganda significance.

At the same time, Russia's closest ties in the military sphere are traditionally maintained with three Latin American countries - Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua. Let's talk about the latter.

Tank support

In 80, Sandinista Nicaragua was the closest ally of the USSR after Cuba to the USSR in the Western Hemisphere. The armed forces of the country received a significant amount of Soviet technology, due to which the armies of the rest of Central America combined surpassed the armies of the rest of Central America. After the Sandinistas lost power and the collapse of the USSR, the Nicaraguan army degraded greatly, since its equipment had not been updated for more than a quarter of a century. However, a few years ago the Sandinistas returned to power and are trying to restore special relations with Russia, including in the military sphere. However, a serious constraint here is the lack of funds from Nicaragua for the purchase of even a limited number of modern weapons.

The ground forces of Nicaragua include the 2 brigade (1 mechanized, 1 MTR), the 2 regiment (1 mixed, 1 transport), several separate battalions.

Tank Park: 62 T-55. Even before 74 and before 20 T-54, as well as the order of 22 light PT-76 in storage. The 20 BRDM-2 (up to 70 in storage), 11 BMP-11 and more 100 armored personnel carriers: up to 20 BTR-40, up to 41 BTR-152 (before 79 in storage), 45 BTR BTH is in service. storage), 60 BTR-37. Artillery includes more than 11 towed implements: American M70 100, 12 Soviet D-101 and 67 M30 up to 24 30-D, a Soviet mortar 30: 20, 600 M579, M24 43, 4 over MRL: 160 Chinese towed Toure 50, 33 Soviet BM-63 and 18 North Korean BM-21. The troops have up to 5 ATMS "Baby" (including 11 self-propelled on BRDM-500) and more 12 PTO - 2 BS-350, 24 ZIS-3, 264 stored, 2 ZIS-90.

Army air defense systems include the Osa 2, about a thousand MANPADS (up to 500 Strela-2, 117 Strela-3, 360 Needle-1), up to 10 ZSU-57-2, according to 18, anti-aircraft, anti-aircraft, anti-aircraft, 23, 2, 19-XNUMX-XNUMX, XNUMX-XNUMX-XNUMX XNUMX-XNUMX and KS-XNUMX.

The Air Force does not have combat aircraft and helicopters. There transport: 1 American RA-28 (even 1 in storage), 2 RA-18 (plus 2-3 in storage), 1 «Cessna-172», 1 «Cessna-206», 1 «Cessna-404», 1 Soviet An-2T (up to 7 in storage), 2 An-26 (and 1 in storage), up to 14 Soviet Mi-17 (before 8 in storage, like 13 Mi-8), 1 American Bell-206В , 1 R-44. In addition, the storage of up to 18 Soviet combat helicopters Mi-25 and up to 3 American "Hughes-369".

As part of the Navy to 23 patrol boats (from 3 to 10 Israeli "Dabur", 4 Spanish "Rodman-101", to 6 Soviet 1400 project, to 3 North Korean "Xing Hung") and to 3 Soviet minesweepers of the 1258 project.

Despite the fact that all the equipment of the Armed Forces of Nicaragua is very outdated and a significant part of it is no longer capable, the ground forces and the Navy of the country still remain the strongest in Central America. Since it is extremely difficult to imagine a direct US military intervention against Nicaragua, at the moment there are no serious external threats to the country. Perhaps in the near future, Managua will acquire in Russia a certain number of T-72 tanks and two missile boats of the 12418 project. However, it should be understood that if the Sandinistas lose power again, cooperation with Moscow will immediately cease. It is impossible to exclude this option.
11 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -2
    2 July 2016 06: 56
    And what's the point of attacking the United States in Nicaragua? Is there oil? Or maybe they lead an aggressive foreign policy with solid political authority and resources? There is as much sense in the attack on this country as in the attack on East Timor or Honduras.
    1. +11
      2 July 2016 08: 22
      Nicaragua in fact an ally of China and Russia and also the channel are going to build

      Also, this country is one of the 9 countries of the absolutely anti-American Bolivarian Union

      The reasons for the attack are therefore already enough

      Another thing is that the attack is not necessarily military force, so look what they did in Argentina or Brazil.
    2. +6
      2 July 2016 10: 00
      What's the point of attacking the United States on Nicaragua ?! And the Nicaraguan transoceanic canal that is actively under construction? Will this reason be enough? So for the amers there is no question about the "democratization" of Nicaragua in the context of "is it necessary", but they consider it in the context of precisely "when".
      1. +1
        2 July 2016 18: 32
        Is it the one that is frozen for a year?

        The HKND Group consortium was urgently created specifically for this construction. By October 2015, the Chinese tycoon and chief concessionaire of the Nicaraguan Canal, Wang Jing, had lost at least 84% of his financial condition.


        The length of 300 km. and passing through the lake, which is used as the main source of drinking water? Completion of which is promised in 2029 year? Are you talking about this channel?
  2. +6
    2 July 2016 07: 32
    The article looks more like a press release from Rosoboronexport ... And the beginning about "gringos" and "Latinos" was promising.
  3. +1
    2 July 2016 07: 41
    However, it must be understood that if the Sandinists lose power again, cooperation with Moscow will cease immediately. This option cannot be excluded...Yes that's for sure ...
  4. 0
    2 July 2016 13: 34
    Well, that's why t-72, and not t-90 ... there’s nothing to pay ... and oranges and bananas .. not a very adequate currency for iron)))
  5. +1
    2 July 2016 13: 46
    Quote: Choi
    And what's the point of attacking the United States in Nicaragua? Is there oil? Or maybe they lead an aggressive foreign policy with solid political authority and resources? There is as much sense in the attack on this country as in the attack on East Timor or Honduras.

    In Honduras, you can’t dig a channel !!! wassat
  6. +4
    2 July 2016 14: 44
    The author Khramchikhin too generously endows the Cubans with absurdity, ideological restrictions. No offense to Khramchikhin, be told, Judaism is all woven from absurdity and limitations.
  7. +2
    2 July 2016 15: 37
    I always read with curiosity Khramchikhin's articles in the military-industrial complex. But where does he own the numbers? And if it does, then its signature phrases - "are in storage" or "a significant part is no longer combat-ready." Okay, he writes this about the Sandinistas or about Yemen, but when he wrote this about Azerbaijan and Armenia, it caused bewilderment. Those. The Institute for Political and Military Analysis monitors some of the information their Masonic lodge, and invents some.
  8. +1
    3 July 2016 22: 01
    The distributor of the 34th Mountain Brigade recently traveled to Nicaragua and conducted joint exercises.
    https://vk.com/photo-62474637_363359249