Military Review

The Pentagon has voiced its version of the rapprochement of "Gravely" with "Yaroslav the Wise"

88
Information continues to come from various sources regarding the details of the “meeting” of the Russian patrol ship Yaroslav the Wise and the American destroyer Gravely. Recall that a few days ago, the Russian Ministry of Defense issued a report that the destroyer of the US Navy made a dangerous approach (at a distance of approximately 60 m) with the ship of the Russian Navy Yaroslav the Wise in the Mediterranean. The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation called such an approach unprofessional actions of American sailors.


The Pentagon has voiced its version of the rapprochement of "Gravely" with "Yaroslav the Wise"


After several days of meditation, the Pentagon decided to issue its own interpretation of the events. According to the top of the American military department, the Yaroslav the Wise outposts allegedly deliberately tried to interfere with the actions of the American aircraft carrier Harry Truman, which was accompanied by the very same destroyer Gravely.

American portal Defense News Publishes a statement from the Pentagon spokesman, referring to the Gravelly commanders:
He (“Yaroslav the Wise”) tried to prevent the “Harry Truman” operation. The Russian ship approached the Gravely destroyer accompanying the aircraft carrier at a distance of about 300 m. At the same time, it was located approximately 5 nautical miles from the Harry Truman.


Further, the Pentagon claims that at Yaroslav the Wise they behaved unprofessionally, announcing via radio communications that space for maneuver was limited and that the corresponding signal flag was hung out.

That is, the logic is something like this: “we have shackled ourselves in the movements” ... Somewhere we have already heard something similar.

From the statement of the representative of the US military:
We are very concerned about the unsafe and unprofessional actions of Russian ships. Such maneuvers can exacerbate tensions between countries.
Photos used:
RT
88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. sdc_alex
    sdc_alex 30 June 2016 07: 47
    +17
    Dangerous driving! Merikos need to write a fine, but better to register. smile

    I didn’t notice one aircraft carrier in the video? Or is he so small? Or maybe underwater?
    1. Andrey K
      Andrey K 30 June 2016 07: 52
      +48
      ... the patrolman "Yaroslav the Wise" allegedly deliberately tried to interfere with the actions of the American aircraft carrier "Harry Truman", which was accompanied by the destroyer "Gravely" ...
      The explanations of the Pentagon warriors are somewhat like our anecdote about the skating rink, which "overtook and cut off" ...
      They themselves hear the nonsense that falls out of their mouths. wassat
      1. Temples
        Temples 30 June 2016 07: 55
        +12
        Actually ameri goats were fishing.
        A big flounder pecked and simply pulled the longboat behind her.
        The flounder simply scored with a fright on all the rules for driving ships on a leash.

        The sailors are not guilty.
        And the captain did not know about fishing at all.
        Upon arrival at the port, according to tradition, half of the sailors wrote reports about the cancellation to land. Keep away from sin.
        1. Now we are free
          Now we are free 30 June 2016 09: 41
          +9
          Guys, what did you want? Let's be honest, more than once in recent years our Navy / Aerospace Forces have given Americans in the nose (if not overdue at all ...). You can understand the Yankees by having the most powerful fleet in the world like this "Suck" from the seemingly scrapped world history of Russia in front of the whole world? ..
          So the "Cowboys" are swaggering and erepening -We say we can too! ..
          In light of the current events, I think similar -Mutual rise ... and continue, the main thing is that without sacrifices. By the way, if anyone worried that we would leave the "Pruning" of our ship unanswered? I can say - Take it easy, now it's our turn to carry the American destroyer / scout plane around the city ... laughing laughing laughing

          P.S. By the way, the United States spends on defense almost 10 times the Russian Federation ... The question is, so who's the fool? If at the usual strong muzhik (Russian Federation) and rolling (the USA) pumped by steroids all the same "Same length"? laughing
          1. Alibekulu
            Alibekulu 30 June 2016 10: 20
            +2
            Quote: Now we are free
            P.S. By the way, the United States spends on defense almost 10 times the Russian Federation ... The question is, so who's the fool? If at the usual strong muzhik (Russian Federation) and rolling (the USA) pumped by steroids all the same "Same length"?
            Young man, I recall the old battered truth - "Size is not important, diameter is important" lol .
            1. unsinkable
              unsinkable 30 June 2016 10: 43
              +5
              Quote: Alibekulu
              Size is not important, diameter is important "

              Well, diameter doesn’t apply to sizes? Yes and * shorty * no diameter will help. PS Colleagues, I don’t want to comment on the nonsense of the Americans. They have already reached us with their concern and stupidity.
              1. sgazeev
                sgazeev 30 June 2016 11: 19
                +4
                Quote: unsinkable
                Quote: Alibekulu
                Size is not important, diameter is important "

                Well, diameter doesn’t apply to sizes? Yes and * shorty * no diameter will help. PS Colleagues, I don’t want to comment on the nonsense of the Americans. They have already reached us with their concern and stupidity.

                As Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Defense, former Commander-in-Chief of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation Vladimir Komoedov, said in an interview with a correspondent of the Federal Agency for Political News, the importance of the maneuver of the American Mediterranean ship is exaggerated.
                “The incident with the destroyer of the US Navy is not worthy of attention and relevant comments,” the parliamentarian said succinctly.
                In April of this year, US authorities criticized Russia because of an incident in the Baltic Sea where the Su-24 Russian Air Force flew at a low altitude over the Donald Cook destroyer.
              2. dvina71
                dvina71 30 June 2016 11: 59
                0
                Quote: unsinkable
                I don’t want to comment on the nonsense of the Americans. They have already reached us with their concern and stupidity.

                This is not nonsense, but making such a statement the Pentagon stepped on.
                In essence, this means that G. Trumman is fighting for vitality, and the escort is sinking. And they admitted it.
                It turns out that they began to respond to our ships with AUG services only by discovering them in direct line of sight.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. hirurg
        hirurg 30 June 2016 08: 27
        +1
        "I'm not guilty! He came himself!" cit.
      3. sdc_alex
        sdc_alex 30 June 2016 08: 29
        +32
        Similar situation:
      4. Andrea
        Andrea 30 June 2016 08: 38
        +5
        Let's remember Zadornov with his Spanish lighthouse and laugh.
      5. Skif83
        Skif83 30 June 2016 12: 00
        +2
        By and large, you need to answer: - Once again and ... FIFTH from all the trunks!
        Uh-uh, where is he the USSR, when if someone is something wrong, then yeah wassat
      6. NIKNN
        NIKNN 30 June 2016 16: 39
        +4
        Hahaha, what did I say the day before yesterday ...
        NIKNN RU June 28, 2016 17:05 | The American destroyer "Gravely" dangerously approached the Russian patrol boat "Yaroslav the Mudry" in the Mediterranean Sea
        C'mon guys. Especially nothing happened.
        I think in response to the claim, the states will answer: "... The Russian ship is dangerously close (180 m from the rear) the course of our destroyer, which is an unacceptable violation of ALL international ... etc." That's when we'll laugh
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 30 June 2016 07: 56
      +1
      After each change of diapers, American warriors accuse Russians of unprofessionalism. Where is the logic? laughing Here, either to think with your head, or to save on diapers.
      1. aba
        aba 30 June 2016 08: 57
        +1
        After each diaper change, American warriors blame

        It seems this time they chose guys with steel Faberge and dispensed with diapers! wink
    4. Sharapov
      Sharapov 30 June 2016 09: 07
      +3
      The article says - up to an aircraft carrier 5 nautical miles.
      This is far, but in sight. The destroyer guarding him stupidly worked out his bread.
      1. romandostalo
        romandostalo 30 June 2016 10: 42
        +2
        I wonder what you can see over 9 kilometers?
        1. Sharapov
          Sharapov 30 June 2016 11: 12
          +3
          If you just look, you will see little.

          And if you control the radio - you collect a lot of useful information.
        2. sgazeev
          sgazeev 30 June 2016 11: 33
          +5
          It is believed that it is almost impossible to break through to the aircraft carrier through its guarding ships. Guaranteed to destroy an aircraft carrier order can only a nuclear warhead, which still has to break through a powerful air defense system.

          However, it is possible not to break through, not to strike striking torpedo-missile attacks. You just need to interrupt the radio communications of aircraft with aircraft carriers and introduce interference into the recognition system "friend or foe". Now all over the world, electronic warfare is given increased attention. The most interesting domestic developments in improving electronic warfare will be shown at the MAKS-2015 air show. It is worth recalling that the premiere of new Reb technologies took place at the same MAKS almost 20 years ago, in 1997. A small company under the little-spoken name “Air Conversion” showed a radio-electronic jamming transmitter that “disconnected” the signal from the GPS satellite navigation system. Most of all, that show impressed the Americans. The United States even purchased several jammers and tested them.

          The effect made them the most negative impression. High-precision cruise missiles, falling into the range of Russian electronic warfare devices, lost their orientation and flew completely not where they needed to. But they tested fairly simple electronic warfare systems. What are the latest “Krauchs” capable of - it’s better for our opponents not to think.

          At the beginning of the invasion of the US armed forces and their allies in Iraq in 2003, not a single cruise missile hit the target exactly. On the fifth day of the war, a scandal erupted. Having lost dozens of expensive missiles in vain, the United States accused Russia of taking its Tomahawks into the desert. US intelligence recognized the approximate locations of the jammers and subjected them to carpet bombing. Only after that did the “smart” weapon work.
      2. sgazeev
        sgazeev 30 June 2016 11: 30
        0
        Quote: Sharapov
        The article says - up to an aircraft carrier 5 nautical miles.
        This is far, but in sight. The destroyer guarding him stupidly worked out his bread.

        Let's pay attention to the protection of the top officials of the state, the guard of Erdogad, pugnacious. During Bamkin's visit, a whole regiment of personal protection is brought in, and with the "carcass" of an aircraft carrier, the destroyer acted in accordance with a marching order.
    5. Maksus
      Maksus 30 June 2016 09: 19
      +1
      It is necessary for the Americans to write a fine for overtaking through continuous and dangerous driving, plus it is clearly visible that they exceed the speed. Aircraft carrier is not visible.
    6. Lyton
      Lyton 30 June 2016 09: 26
      +1
      Yes, yes, he himself came, crossed the nasty wake of the Americans, and in fact we apparently decided to show who was the master there in the sea and began to twist feints in front of ours, and the Pentagon had to come up with ridiculous excuses for these maneuvers.
    7. Alex_Rarog
      Alex_Rarog 30 June 2016 10: 08
      +1
      31 seconds in front of the nose on the horizon aircraft carrier!
    8. alex-defensor
      alex-defensor 30 June 2016 10: 16
      +3
      The article is clearly written, before the aircraft carrier another 5 nautical miles. So, hurry up to post the first comment that you don’t have time to think already!
    9. Mhpv
      Mhpv 30 June 2016 10: 40
      +2
      The answer to this maneuver lies in the rules:
      18 Rule. MUTUAL OBLIGATIONS OF COURTS.
      Except where the 9, 10, and 13 Rules require otherwise:
      a. A power-driven vessel on the move shall give way:
      i. a vessel deprived of the ability to steer;
      ii. a vessel limited in ability to maneuver;
      iii. a vessel engaged in fishing;
      iv. sailing ship.
      b. Sailing vessel on the move should give way:
      i. a vessel deprived of the ability to steer;
      ii. a vessel limited in ability to maneuver;
      iii. a vessel engaged in fishing.
      c. A vessel engaged in fishing should, as far as possible, concede
      way:
      i. a vessel deprived of the ability to steer;
      ii. a vessel limited in ability to maneuver.
      d. (d)
      i. Any ship, except for a ship without
      ability to be driven, or a vessel limited in ability
      maneuver, should not, if circumstances permit, impede
      safe passage of a ship constrained by its draft and exhibiting
      Signals prescribed by 28 Rule.
      ii. a vessel constrained by its draft must proceed with
      special care, carefully in accordance with the peculiarity of his
      condition.
      e. A seaplane on water should, in general, stay away from everyone
      ships and not impede their movement. However, in cases where there is
      danger of collision, he must comply with the rules of this Part.
      http://www.yachtcompany.ru/files/mppss-72.pdf
      1. Awaz
        Awaz 30 June 2016 17: 41
        0
        there is also the rule as in the traffic rules, the rule of "hindrance from the right" Americans for any violated the rules of navigation.
    10. chunga-changa
      chunga-changa 30 June 2016 11: 09
      +1
      Quote: sdc_alex
      I didn’t notice one aircraft carrier in the video?

      Apparently yes, AB is in direct line of sight.
    11. sgazeev
      sgazeev 30 June 2016 11: 11
      +3
      Quote: sdc_alex
      Dangerous driving! Merikos need to write a fine, but better to register. smile

      I didn’t notice one aircraft carrier in the video? Or is he so small? Or maybe underwater?

      Conversation of an American aircraft carrier with a Spanish lighthouse at Cape Finisterre (Galicia).
      Spaniards (clutter in the background):
      - ... Says A-853, please turn 15 degrees south to avoid a collision with us. You are moving right at us, a distance of 25 nautical miles.
      Americans (background noise):
      - We advise you to turn 15 degrees to the north to avoid a collision with us.
      Spaniards:
      - The answer is negative. Repeat, turn 15 degrees south to avoid a collision. Americans (different voice):
      “The captain of the ship of the United States of America is speaking to you.” Turn 15 degrees north to avoid a collision.
      Spaniards:
      “We do not consider your proposal either possible or adequate; we advise you to turn 15 degrees south so as not to crash into us.”
      Americans (in elevated tones):
      - CAPTAIN RICHARD JAMES HOWARD SPEAKS TO YOU, USS LINCOLN AIRCRAFT COMMANDER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECOND BY THE MAJORITY OF THE Navy OF THE AMERICAN Navy. We are escorted by 2 cruisers, 6 destroyers, 4 submarines and numerous support ships. I DO NOT ADVISE YOU - I ORDER TO CHANGE YOUR COURSE BY 15 DEGREES IN THE NORTH. OTHERWISE, WE WILL BE FORCED TO TAKE THE NECESSARY MEASURES TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF OUR SHIP. PLEASE IMMEDIATELY REMOVE OUR COURSE !!! Spaniards:
      “Juan Manuel Salas Alcantara is speaking to you.” There are two of us. We are accompanied by a dog, dinner, 2 bottles of beer and a canary, which is now sleeping. We are supported by the radio station and channel 106 “Extreme situations at sea”. We are not going to turn anywhere, given that we are on land and are the A-853 lighthouse on Cape Finisterre of the Galician coast of Spain. We have no idea what place we have in size among the Spanish lighthouses. You can accept everything ... !!! measures that you consider necessary, and do anything to ensure your safety ... !!! ship that will smash into smithereens on the rocks. Therefore, once again, we strongly recommend that you do the most meaningful thing: change your course 15 degrees south to avoid a collision.
      Americans:
      - OK, accepted, thanks. Yanks, well, stupid !!!
    12. Simple
      Simple 30 June 2016 11: 49
      0
      "So Littel"
      He was also XZ in 5 miles. What a rumba!
      Of course, a destroyer under the stern of a training torpedo would not hurt.
      Where was the traffic police?
      Dangerous "driving" whatever you say
    13. oblako
      oblako 30 June 2016 12: 10
      +2
      The aircraft carrier "Harry Truman" dangerously approached the patrol boat "Yaroslav the Wise", which was "restricted in movement" due to unclear circumstances ... The circumstances are being investigated. State Department: - Concerned! Ministry of Foreign Affairs: concern has grounds! MO: Navy: - The command of the Baltic Fleet has been removed. Extract from the plan for eliminating the identified shortcomings: "Conduct additional instructions from sailor Khudaiberdyev on the topic:" Silhouettes of the ships of a potential enemy "... A silent question in the eyes of the sailor:" .. so this was not a Caucasian wedding?! ... (
    14. psiho117
      psiho117 30 June 2016 12: 34
      +1
      Quote: sdc_alex


      I didn’t notice one aircraft carrier in the video? Or is he so small? Or maybe underwater?

      so it is at least 9-10 kilometers from there hi 1 nautical mile - 1852m, therefore 5 miles - 9260 km ...
      Here are our scary watchtowers - how suitable for 10 kilometers, so immediately breast protection rushes to the defense! bully
    15. Number 17
      Number 17 30 June 2016 15: 01
      0
      Colleague, why fine. One fly around su24 and take everything off like a hand.
  2. Passer
    Passer 30 June 2016 07: 49
    +2
    They would come up with something new. And then somehow it becomes boring.
    1. 33 Watcher
      33 Watcher 30 June 2016 08: 07
      +2
      Quote: Passer
      They would come up with something new. And then somehow it becomes boring.

      Yes, do not say ..! He locked himself ... They fire at themselves ... Really boring.
    2. Think so
      Think so 30 June 2016 08: 14
      +4
      Indeed: "diapers", "diapers" ...
      We need something new! For example, "panties with a hydraulic discharge" or "containers with feces", "automatic intra-abdominal catapult", "forced return to the body of emergency excretion", etc.
      But seriously, this is a bad trend - "show-off with a weapon." One day someone's nerves will break down and ... fuck all our wit!
      Sorry for the children - they live and live!
      1. Koshak
        Koshak 30 June 2016 10: 30
        0
        Quote: I think so
        Indeed: "diapers", "diapers" ...
        We need something new! For example, "panties with hydraulic discharge", or "waste containers" ...

        In medical practice, urine and colostomy are used.
        1. AUL
          AUL 30 June 2016 11: 16
          +1
          Pampers were trending the year before last! Those who write about them - do not keep abreast of fashion, are hopelessly behind. Fu Fu Fu!
  3. Ros 56
    Ros 56 30 June 2016 07: 49
    +1
    What can I say, all words and phrases are only non-parliamentary. Striped when lying, at least bounce.
    1. Sigizbarn
      Sigizbarn 30 June 2016 08: 42
      -4
      And they hung the signal flag along the instagram.
      Judging by the video, no signal flag is observed
      1. pv1005
        pv1005 30 June 2016 09: 07
        +5
        Quote: Sigizbarn
        And they hung the signal flag along the instagram.
        Judging by the video, no signal flag is observed

        Especially for you:
        Further, the Pentagon claims that at Yaroslav the Wise they behaved unprofessionally, announcing via radio communications that space for maneuver was limited and that the corresponding signal flag was hung out.

        I’m once again translating into Russian, in Yaroslav the Wise they raised a signal according to the code of the MPPSS (international rules for preventing collisions of ships), and a video from Yaroslav the Wise too. When you photograph your wife, do you see your back in the photograph?
  4. kolkulon
    kolkulon 30 June 2016 07: 49
    +1
    Fine in the form of a torpedo to the Bochin.
    1. kolobok63
      kolobok63 30 June 2016 09: 02
      -1
      I think that a line of guns for a bite of these warriors would cool their ardor! hi
    2. sgazeev
      sgazeev 30 June 2016 11: 45
      0
      Quote: kolkulon
      Fine in the form of a torpedo to the Bochin.

      And now about the aircraft carriers.

      Their weakest place is aircraft returning from a combat mission. The pilots are exhausted, and the fuel is running out. If at this moment you turn on the suppression systems for satellite navigation and radio communications, then the pilots will experience extreme psychological stress, since it’s a big problem to get to your floating airfield. But a real catastrophe will arise when the “friend or foe” recognition systems are turned off. The modern air defense systems of ships are based on computer technologies, which, calculating radar data, give target designation to missile and artillery systems. When the marks of their planes disappear on the radars, and some unidentifiable aircraft appear, the air defense of the warships escorting the aircraft carrier in automatic mode will open fire on them. While the commanders sort it out and give the command to cease fire, most of the aircraft will be destroyed. And the carrier group will actually cease to exist, since its main striking force will disappear.

      The question is how to deliver electronic warfare systems to an aircraft carrier warrant and how to turn them on at the right time. It turned out that this is not the most difficult and completely solvable task. But it is too early to speak about this exclusive, I must say, decision.
  5. bad
    bad 30 June 2016 07: 50
    0
    He (“Yaroslav the Wise”) tried to prevent the “Harry Truman” operation. The Russian ship approached the Gravely destroyer accompanying the aircraft carrier at a distance of about 300 m. At the same time, it was located approximately 5 nautical miles from the Harry Truman.
    ..that is, according to the mattresses, "Yaroslav the Wise" almost threatened the Aviv carrier with a battering ram? .. why .. be afraid then .. then don't complain if you bring it to sin ..
  6. sa-ag
    sa-ag 30 June 2016 07: 52
    -7
    Well, what happened, judging by the video, the watchman had the opportunity to make a maneuver of evading an enemy following with a known higher speed :-)
    1. crumb
      crumb 30 June 2016 10: 38
      +4
      here are the rules of the IPPC -72:
      Section II - Navigation of vessels in full view of each other
      Rule 15 - Course Crossing Situation

      When two vessels with mechanical engines go intersecting courses so that there is a danger of collision, the vessel that has the other on its right side must give way to the other vessel and at the same time it should, if circumstances allow, avoid crossing the course of the other vessel nose.
      1. sgazeev
        sgazeev 30 June 2016 11: 49
        +1
        Quote: croche
        here are the rules of the IPPC -72:
        Section II - Navigation of vessels in full view of each other
        Rule 15 - Course Crossing Situation

        When two vessels with mechanical engines go intersecting courses so that there is a danger of collision, the vessel that has the other on its right side must give way to the other vessel and at the same time it should, if circumstances allow, avoid crossing the course of the other vessel nose.

        The rule "interference from the right" has not been canceled.
  7. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 30 June 2016 07: 55
    +8
    The video clearly shows how the American "cuts" our ship. But for Americans, their behavior at sea, in the air, on the ground is non-negotiable. Those who are near are always to blame. In this incident, one can see some kind of revenge for the repeated fears of the sailors of "Donald Cook".
  8. _umka_
    _umka_ 30 June 2016 07: 56
    +6
    To believe the Americans - do not respect yourself.
  9. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 30 June 2016 07: 56
    -1
    Nothing, nothing! SS 24 with "Khibiny" is already warming up!
    1. chikenous59
      chikenous59 30 June 2016 08: 00
      +4
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      Nothing, nothing! SS 24 with "Khibiny" is already warming up!

      The Americans then were not afraid of "Khibiny", but "Bastion"
    2. Koshak
      Koshak 30 June 2016 10: 33
      0
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      Nothing, nothing! SS 24 with "Khibiny" is already warming up!

      On the Su-24 "Khibiny" is not installed.
  10. atamankko
    atamankko 30 June 2016 08: 00
    +1
    Another master-class lies in an American way.
  11. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 30 June 2016 08: 03
    +2
    An old joke from the nineties was remembered. About the six hundredth Mercedes and the asphalt paver - Well, man, tell me. How to overtake ... how to cut ....
  12. Shadowcat
    Shadowcat 30 June 2016 08: 04
    +1
    I propose to give a welcome airborne salvo
  13. udincev
    udincev 30 June 2016 08: 12
    +7
    We thought and analyzed for a long time ...
    Well, if nothing shines - a trouble-free kindergarten argument: "you yourself!"
  14. Wolka
    Wolka 30 June 2016 08: 12
    +2
    the Yankees are clearly bluffing, a sort of show of strength, but gives off with obvious diarrhea ...
  15. darksoul
    darksoul 30 June 2016 08: 16
    0
    and now read the comments of this RT video on YouTube ........ I think we Ukrainians have a real holiday, but what's there ... a feast for the whole world ... they rejoice like children
  16. Taygerus
    Taygerus 30 June 2016 08: 17
    +1
    theater of the absurd
  17. Max repp
    Max repp 30 June 2016 08: 19
    0
    It’s interesting to know if Captain Yaroslav the Wise appeared, when it became clear that this galosh crosses the course, untwist the turbines and put them in the barrel, he certainly couldn’t accelerate the ship so quickly =) but all the same, an additional amount of biomaterial from the sailors of mattresses in diapers appeared would
    1. Kostya Andreev
      Kostya Andreev 30 June 2016 08: 37
      0
      There are no captains on warships, there are commanders. (Sorry for the amendment)
    2. Koshak
      Koshak 30 June 2016 10: 45
      0
      Quote: Maks Repp
      It’s interesting to know if Captain Yaroslav the Wise appeared when it became clear that this galosh crosses the course, spin up the turbines and give them stem to the barrel

      The "Yaroslav the Wise" has a maximum speed of 30 knots, and the "Gravely" - 32
  18. koralvit
    koralvit 30 June 2016 08: 22
    +3
    When there is nothing to justify, then there is only one version, they fired at themselves. And the Ukroprygunov were taught the same, their air conditioners themselves began to explode, the militia fired at themselves. It's boring that they would come up with something new, or they don't have enough brains. "Yaroslav the Wise" presented evidence of his version, showed the unprofessional actions of your "Gravely", but where is the evidence of your words?
  19. Hariton laptev
    Hariton laptev 30 June 2016 08: 28
    +3
    The question is, the Pentagon made a wave three days after ours dipped their nose, something did not fit their logic, usually after a couple of hours the screech was raised through all the channels and everyone sheds their snot, and then three days and then, if ours had not come out with their indignation, they would not have voiced their version. So the poor excuse, gentlemen, the Americans, each time it gets worse and worse and worse it really becomes not interesting.
  20. sub307
    sub307 30 June 2016 08: 37
    +3
    Here, in fact, there is nothing to comment on .... It is obvious from the video that "Gravely" went to the intersection of the course of "Yaroslav the Wise", having previously accelerated.
  21. Warm Padded Jacket
    Warm Padded Jacket 30 June 2016 08: 43
    0
    Zadornov has a monologue about the Spanish lighthouse and the American aircraft carrier, a similar situation)))
    https://youtu.be/ql0ce2NY8GU
  22. K-50
    K-50 30 June 2016 08: 52
    +1
    Such maneuvers can exacerbate tensions between countries.

    As the saying goes from sick to healthy! request fool
    It is strange to talk about the maneuvers of a Russian watchdog, when it was the destroyer under the "mattress" that was maneuvering (overtaking, changing course and crossing the course of another ship). fool
    The Russian ship approached the grave destroyer accompanying the aircraft carrier at a distance of about 300 m. At the same time, it was about 5 nautical miles from the Harry Truman.

    And in other sources, it was the martras ship that approached the Russian at a distance of 60-70 meters on the port side and crossed the course at a distance of 180 meters, which is slightly more than the length of the ship. If it was on the road, the drivers would have come out to knock one another on the forehead for such driving, namely "undercut", as it is called. Don't go to the fortuneteller. request fool
  23. newterra
    newterra 30 June 2016 09: 04
    +2
    Quote: sdc_alex
    Similar situation:

    I neighing until you drop
  24. Titsen
    Titsen 30 June 2016 09: 22
    0
    Quote: Andrey K
    They themselves hear the nonsense that falls out of their mouths.


    Bobanovskie minions and verbiage for many years already are nonsense - but they are echoed by the whole Western world ...

    But China is silent ....
  25. mealnik2005
    mealnik2005 30 June 2016 09: 36
    +1
    Quote: sdc_alex
    Dangerous driving! Merikos need to write a fine, but better to register. smile

    I didn’t notice one aircraft carrier in the video? Or is he so small? Or maybe underwater?



    In vain you jerk, 3-5 degrees to the left along the movement of the guard on the horizon something looms. Maybe an aircraft carrier.
  26. Jamuqa
    Jamuqa 30 June 2016 09: 36
    +1
    Did they hear anything about the interference on the right?
  27. sgr291158
    sgr291158 30 June 2016 09: 41
    0
    And how could we prevent this aircraft carrier, which was 5 miles away from us, it is not even visible.
  28. Forever so
    Forever so 30 June 2016 09: 55
    0
    It’s a direct situation on the road, when another moodeak at the next pejo or Reno decided that you were stopping him from going. Looking at this a, I was expecting that he would start blinking with stoparas, they say, braking)))
  29. Vladimir Anatolyevich
    Vladimir Anatolyevich 30 June 2016 10: 00
    +1
    Throw a link from youtube to the pentagon. As it was in 1988 in the Black Sea. And then their memory is "girlish".
  30. fix
    fix 30 June 2016 10: 25
    0
    And I wonder, "Wise" in a solo voyage?
  31. Sasha_Sar
    Sasha_Sar 30 June 2016 10: 27
    +3
    And then screeching screeching. Normal situation in the 80s of the last century. Our "Yaroslav the Wise" was tracking the AUG, while the yankers were conducting counter tracking. It's just that both of them have not been doing this for a long time (there were damn partners). Our fellows, that the first "cracked" on all channels, the Yankees did not expect this. Therefore, they digested the situation for three days and finally gave out a pearl. Given their qualifications (A la Psaki), there is no reason to be surprised.
  32. AlexTires
    AlexTires 30 June 2016 10: 35
    +2
    Gringo's comments have always been distinguished by "simplicity and unpretentiousness" and there is already a grading scale - 1 psaki! In this case, this comment (with accusations) is drawn to 3 psaki! 1 psaki for "false signals" + 1 psaki for "trying to get close" + 1 psaki for "obstructing maneuvering"! For "tough sailors" (not "... moves"), evil orcs and trolls, I will explain, so be it that giving a signal is not only a limitation of your maneuvers, but also a warning to an approaching ship about the danger and inadmissibility of convergence. .. The Gringos themselves admit that ours warned them and, nevertheless, in violation of the COLREGs, decided to change course and speed ... In this case, YAM had to do something - this is absolutely normal when you are in international waters ! And one should not confuse fear with the fulfillment of the requirements of international rules or the actions of ships and aircraft in territorial waters (a sovereign 200-mile economic zone) ... Apparently the gringos forgot about this or decided that their 200 miles are the zones around their ships

    Well, here, if you joke, then Yaroslav the Wise defeated Harry Truman. The World History. Bank Imperial .. belay .
  33. imugn
    imugn 30 June 2016 11: 13
    0
    At first he stood or moved slowly, then he gave a run across
  34. Verdun
    Verdun 30 June 2016 11: 28
    +1
    He (Yaroslav the Wise) was trying to interfere with the operation of Harry Truman.
    There is only one way to hinder the operation of an aircraft carrier located several miles away - by drowning it with an accurate missile hit.
  35. Prince of Pensions
    Prince of Pensions 30 June 2016 11: 31
    0
    Ah well done forum users, it is))) rzhunemagu)))
  36. HMR333
    HMR333 30 June 2016 11: 31
    0
    it was necessary, as in Soviet times, to float the rams ea its back, let the monkeys sit on the ass hair and turn on the brain chtol nehru odd!
  37. Valter1364
    Valter1364 30 June 2016 11: 46
    +3
    Judging by the minuscule professional comments, there are one hundred "hurray-patriots" for each sailor.
    The mattress carrier can be seen with the naked eye even on the photograph accompanying the article, to the left at the stern of the destroyer. Now his maneuver is clear. The destroyer, crossing our course, made it clear that further rapprochement with the aircraft carrier is dangerous. At that moment, these were the direct duties of the destroyer accompanying the Harry Truman.
    Our intentions are absolutely clear from everything we have seen. The ship of the Russian Navy "Yaroslav the Wise" clearly and distinctly, with its actions conveyed to the amers, "What did we put on your aircraft carrier and all of its escort!" ... and it is right!
    Who cares, look at the materials related to the behavior of escort ships in the Mediterranean during the USSR. There were such graters that wow!
    That's why for the most part I do not like this writing fraternity. Their task is not to give out objective information, but to zombie the population and raise the morale of one tribe in front of another.
    Our fighting spirit does not need to be raised, it is already on top. soldier smile
  38. viktor.
    viktor. 30 June 2016 12: 31
    0
    and they even have an idea as Russian dangerously can drive? laughing fool Americans would have become less in place in the Mediterranean bully
  39. tihonmarine
    tihonmarine 30 June 2016 12: 32
    +3
    If the destroyer "Gravely" was engaged in some kind of work, then she must exhibit signs "Restriction of the ability to maneuver" ball-diamond-ball vertically. As you can see from the video and photo, he does not carry them, but overtakes a Russian patrol. Even drivers on the road have a rule "don't be sure, don't overtake!" In my Leningrad sailor, a cadet who received an MPPS grade for a semester was expelled and sent to the Marine Corps as a "cheerful guy with a machine gun."
    1. Kudrevkn
      Kudrevkn 30 June 2016 14: 59
      0
      I agree with you, but here "it is his own fault ..."? Moreover, a woman "at the wheel" (steering wheel) of a destroyer? True, not a blonde, but all the same - WOMAN IS NOT A PLACE IN THE FLEET! Otherwise there will be trouble - we were burning in the center of Vladivostok (berth 33) after the "bath with a heifer" of the flagship mechanic of the squadron !? They burned strongly, but without casualties, and the EM "Discreet" (956) was then let on the "needles" because of ... the baths and women on the ship ?! That's how it happens!
      1. Sasha_Sar
        Sasha_Sar 30 June 2016 17: 18
        +1
        Sadness. That’s for sure, the women will be brought to the zugunder.
  40. Lester7777
    Lester7777 30 June 2016 13: 11
    0
    The United States in its repertoire, a response in the style of "insidious Yugoslavs meanly stand in the way of our peaceful" Tomahawks "...
  41. afrikanez
    afrikanez 30 June 2016 15: 33
    0
    Except as "shape-shifters", you will not name amerikosov. Once again, everything was thrown from a sore head to a healthy one. As they say: impudence, second happiness. angry
  42. Sergey333
    Sergey333 30 June 2016 22: 14
    +1
    Have fun to the fullest, as in the good old days laughing