The Pentagon has voiced its version of the rapprochement of "Gravely" with "Yaroslav the Wise"

Information continues to come from various sources regarding the details of the “meeting” of the Russian patrol ship Yaroslav the Wise and the American destroyer Gravely. Recall that a few days ago, the Russian Ministry of Defense issued a report that the destroyer of the US Navy made a dangerous approach (at a distance of approximately 60 m) with the ship of the Russian Navy Yaroslav the Wise in the Mediterranean. The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation called such an approach unprofessional actions of American sailors.

After several days of meditation, the Pentagon decided to issue its own interpretation of the events. According to the top of the American military department, the Yaroslav the Wise outposts allegedly deliberately tried to interfere with the actions of the American aircraft carrier Harry Truman, which was accompanied by the very same destroyer Gravely.

American portal Defense News Publishes a statement from the Pentagon spokesman, referring to the Gravelly commanders:

He (“Yaroslav the Wise”) tried to prevent the “Harry Truman” operation. The Russian ship approached the Gravely destroyer accompanying the aircraft carrier at a distance of about 300 m. At the same time, it was located approximately 5 nautical miles from the Harry Truman.

Further, the Pentagon claims that at Yaroslav the Wise they behaved unprofessionally, announcing via radio communications that space for maneuver was limited and that the corresponding signal flag was hung out.

That is, the logic is something like this: “we have shackled ourselves in the movements” ... Somewhere we have already heard something similar.

From the statement of the representative of the US military:

We are very concerned about the unsafe and unprofessional actions of Russian ships. Such maneuvers can exacerbate tensions between countries.

Comments

[sdc_alex]

Dangerous driving! Merikos need to write a fine, but better to register.

I didn’t notice one aircraft carrier in the video? Or is he so small? Or maybe underwater?

[Andrey K]

... the patrolman "Yaroslav the Wise" allegedly deliberately tried to interfere with the actions of the American aircraft carrier "Harry Truman", which was accompanied by the destroyer "Gravely" ...
The explanations of the Pentagon warriors are somewhat like our anecdote about the skating rink, which "overtook and cut off" ...
They themselves hear the nonsense that falls out of their mouths.

[Temples]

Actually ameri goats were fishing.
A big flounder pecked and simply pulled the longboat behind her.
The flounder simply scored with a fright on all the rules for driving ships on a leash.

The sailors are not guilty.
And the captain did not know about fishing at all.
Upon arrival at the port, according to tradition, half of the sailors wrote reports about the cancellation to land. Keep away from sin.

[Now we are free]

Guys, what did you want? Let's be honest, more than once in recent years our Navy / Aerospace Forces have given Americans in the nose (if not overdue at all ...). You can understand the Yankees by having the most powerful fleet in the world like this "Suck" from the seemingly scrapped world history of Russia in front of the whole world? ..
So the "Cowboys" are swaggering and erepening -We say we can too! ..
In light of the current events, I think similar -Mutual rise ... and continue, the main thing is that without sacrifices. By the way, if anyone worried that we would leave the "Pruning" of our ship unanswered? I can say - Take it easy, now it's our turn to carry the American destroyer / scout plane around the city ...

P.S. By the way, the United States spends on defense almost 10 times the Russian Federation ... The question is, so who's the fool? If at the usual strong muzhik (Russian Federation) and rolling (the USA) pumped by steroids all the same "Same length"?

[Alibekulu]

Quote: Now we are free

P.S. By the way, the United States spends on defense almost 10 times the Russian Federation ... The question is, so who's the fool? If at the usual strong muzhik (Russian Federation) and rolling (the USA) pumped by steroids all the same "Same length"?

Young man, I recall the old battered truth - "Size is not important, diameter is important" .

[unsinkable]

Quote: Alibekulu

Size is not important, diameter is important "

Well, diameter doesn’t apply to sizes? Yes and * shorty * no diameter will help. PS Colleagues, I don’t want to comment on the nonsense of the Americans. They have already reached us with their concern and stupidity.

[sgazeev]

Quote: unsinkable

Quote: Alibekulu

Size is not important, diameter is important "

Well, diameter doesn’t apply to sizes? Yes and * shorty * no diameter will help. PS Colleagues, I don’t want to comment on the nonsense of the Americans. They have already reached us with their concern and stupidity.

As Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Defense, former Commander-in-Chief of the Black Sea Fleet of the Russian Federation Vladimir Komoedov, said in an interview with a correspondent of the Federal Agency for Political News, the importance of the maneuver of the American Mediterranean ship is exaggerated.
“The incident with the destroyer of the US Navy is not worthy of attention and relevant comments,” the parliamentarian said succinctly.
In April of this year, US authorities criticized Russia because of an incident in the Baltic Sea where the Su-24 Russian Air Force flew at a low altitude over the Donald Cook destroyer.

[dvina71]

Quote: unsinkable

I don’t want to comment on the nonsense of the Americans. They have already reached us with their concern and stupidity.

This is not nonsense, but making such a statement the Pentagon stepped on.
In essence, this means that G. Trumman is fighting for vitality, and the escort is sinking. And they admitted it.
It turns out that they began to respond to our ships with AUG services only by discovering them in direct line of sight.

[hirurg]

"I'm not guilty! He came himself!" cit.

[sdc_alex]

Similar situation:

[Andrea]

Let's remember Zadornov with his Spanish lighthouse and laugh.

[Skif83]

By and large, you need to answer: - Once again and ... FIFTH from all the trunks!
Uh-uh, where is he the USSR, when if someone is something wrong, then yeah

[NIKNN]

Hahaha, what did I say the day before yesterday ...

NIKNN RU June 28, 2016 17:05 | The American destroyer "Gravely" dangerously approached the Russian patrol boat "Yaroslav the Mudry" in the Mediterranean Sea
C'mon guys. Especially nothing happened.
I think in response to the claim, the states will answer: "... The Russian ship is dangerously close (180 m from the rear) the course of our destroyer, which is an unacceptable violation of ALL international ... etc." That's when we'll laugh

[siberalt]

After each change of diapers, American warriors accuse Russians of unprofessionalism. Where is the logic? Here, either to think with your head, or to save on diapers.

[aba]

After each diaper change, American warriors blame

It seems this time they chose guys with steel Faberge and dispensed with diapers!

[Sharapov]

The article says - up to an aircraft carrier 5 nautical miles.
This is far, but in sight. The destroyer guarding him stupidly worked out his bread.

[romandostalo]

I wonder what you can see over 9 kilometers?

[Sharapov]

If you just look, you will see little.

And if you control the radio - you collect a lot of useful information.

[sgazeev]

It is believed that it is almost impossible to break through to the aircraft carrier through its guarding ships. Guaranteed to destroy an aircraft carrier order can only a nuclear warhead, which still has to break through a powerful air defense system.

However, it is possible not to break through, not to strike striking torpedo-missile attacks. You just need to interrupt the radio communications of aircraft with aircraft carriers and introduce interference into the recognition system "friend or foe". Now all over the world, electronic warfare is given increased attention. The most interesting domestic developments in improving electronic warfare will be shown at the MAKS-2015 air show. It is worth recalling that the premiere of new Reb technologies took place at the same MAKS almost 20 years ago, in 1997. A small company under the little-spoken name “Air Conversion” showed a radio-electronic jamming transmitter that “disconnected” the signal from the GPS satellite navigation system. Most of all, that show impressed the Americans. The United States even purchased several jammers and tested them.

The effect made them the most negative impression. High-precision cruise missiles, falling into the range of Russian electronic warfare devices, lost their orientation and flew completely not where they needed to. But they tested fairly simple electronic warfare systems. What are the latest “Krauchs” capable of - it’s better for our opponents not to think.

At the beginning of the invasion of the US armed forces and their allies in Iraq in 2003, not a single cruise missile hit the target exactly. On the fifth day of the war, a scandal erupted. Having lost dozens of expensive missiles in vain, the United States accused Russia of taking its Tomahawks into the desert. US intelligence recognized the approximate locations of the jammers and subjected them to carpet bombing. Only after that did the “smart” weapon work.

[sgazeev]

Quote: Sharapov

The article says - up to an aircraft carrier 5 nautical miles.
This is far, but in sight. The destroyer guarding him stupidly worked out his bread.

Let's pay attention to the protection of the top officials of the state, the guard of Erdogad, pugnacious. During Bamkin's visit, a whole regiment of personal protection is brought in, and with the "carcass" of an aircraft carrier, the destroyer acted in accordance with a marching order.

[Maksus]

It is necessary for the Americans to write a fine for overtaking through continuous and dangerous driving, plus it is clearly visible that they exceed the speed. Aircraft carrier is not visible.

[Lyton]

Yes, yes, he himself came, crossed the nasty wake of the Americans, and in fact we apparently decided to show who was the master there in the sea and began to twist feints in front of ours, and the Pentagon had to come up with ridiculous excuses for these maneuvers.

[Alex_Rarog]

31 seconds in front of the nose on the horizon aircraft carrier!

[alex-defensor]

The article is clearly written, before the aircraft carrier another 5 nautical miles. So, hurry up to post the first comment that you don’t have time to think already!

[Mhpv]

The answer to this maneuver lies in the rules:
18 Rule. MUTUAL OBLIGATIONS OF COURTS.
Except where the 9, 10, and 13 Rules require otherwise:
a. A power-driven vessel on the move shall give way:
i. a vessel deprived of the ability to steer;
ii. a vessel limited in ability to maneuver;
iii. a vessel engaged in fishing;
iv. sailing ship.
b. Sailing vessel on the move should give way:
i. a vessel deprived of the ability to steer;
ii. a vessel limited in ability to maneuver;
iii. a vessel engaged in fishing.
c. A vessel engaged in fishing should, as far as possible, concede
way:
i. a vessel deprived of the ability to steer;
ii. a vessel limited in ability to maneuver.
d. (d)
i. Any ship, except for a ship without
ability to be driven, or a vessel limited in ability
maneuver, should not, if circumstances permit, impede
safe passage of a ship constrained by its draft and exhibiting
Signals prescribed by 28 Rule.
ii. a vessel constrained by its draft must proceed with
special care, carefully in accordance with the peculiarity of his
condition.
e. A seaplane on water should, in general, stay away from everyone
ships and not impede their movement. However, in cases where there is
danger of collision, he must comply with the rules of this Part.
http://www.yachtcompany.ru/files/mppss-72.pdf

[Awaz]

there is also the rule as in the traffic rules, the rule of "hindrance from the right" Americans for any violated the rules of navigation.

[chunga-changa]

Quote: sdc_alex

I didn’t notice one aircraft carrier in the video?

Apparently yes, AB is in direct line of sight.

[sgazeev]

Quote: sdc_alex

Dangerous driving! Merikos need to write a fine, but better to register.

I didn’t notice one aircraft carrier in the video? Or is he so small? Or maybe underwater?

Conversation of an American aircraft carrier with a Spanish lighthouse at Cape Finisterre (Galicia).
Spaniards (clutter in the background):
- ... Says A-853, please turn 15 degrees south to avoid a collision with us. You are moving right at us, a distance of 25 nautical miles.
Americans (background noise):
- We advise you to turn 15 degrees to the north to avoid a collision with us.
Spaniards:
- The answer is negative. Repeat, turn 15 degrees south to avoid a collision. Americans (different voice):
“The captain of the ship of the United States of America is speaking to you.” Turn 15 degrees north to avoid a collision.
Spaniards:
“We do not consider your proposal either possible or adequate; we advise you to turn 15 degrees south so as not to crash into us.”
Americans (in elevated tones):
- CAPTAIN RICHARD JAMES HOWARD SPEAKS TO YOU, USS LINCOLN AIRCRAFT COMMANDER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SECOND BY THE MAJORITY OF THE Navy OF THE AMERICAN Navy. We are escorted by 2 cruisers, 6 destroyers, 4 submarines and numerous support ships. I DO NOT ADVISE YOU - I ORDER TO CHANGE YOUR COURSE BY 15 DEGREES IN THE NORTH. OTHERWISE, WE WILL BE FORCED TO TAKE THE NECESSARY MEASURES TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF OUR SHIP. PLEASE IMMEDIATELY REMOVE OUR COURSE !!! Spaniards:
“Juan Manuel Salas Alcantara is speaking to you.” There are two of us. We are accompanied by a dog, dinner, 2 bottles of beer and a canary, which is now sleeping. We are supported by the radio station and channel 106 “Extreme situations at sea”. We are not going to turn anywhere, given that we are on land and are the A-853 lighthouse on Cape Finisterre of the Galician coast of Spain. We have no idea what place we have in size among the Spanish lighthouses. You can accept everything ... !!! measures that you consider necessary, and do anything to ensure your safety ... !!! ship that will smash into smithereens on the rocks. Therefore, once again, we strongly recommend that you do the most meaningful thing: change your course 15 degrees south to avoid a collision.
Americans:
- OK, accepted, thanks. Yanks, well, stupid !!!

[Simple]

"So Littel"
He was also XZ in 5 miles. What a rumba!
Of course, a destroyer under the stern of a training torpedo would not hurt.
Where was the traffic police?
Dangerous "driving" whatever you say

[oblako]

The aircraft carrier "Harry Truman" dangerously approached the patrol boat "Yaroslav the Wise", which was "restricted in movement" due to unclear circumstances ... The circumstances are being investigated. State Department: - Concerned! Ministry of Foreign Affairs: concern has grounds! MO: Navy: - The command of the Baltic Fleet has been removed. Extract from the plan for eliminating the identified shortcomings: "Conduct additional instructions from sailor Khudaiberdyev on the topic:" Silhouettes of the ships of a potential enemy "... A silent question in the eyes of the sailor:" .. so this was not a Caucasian wedding?! ... (

[psiho117]

Quote: sdc_alex

I didn’t notice one aircraft carrier in the video? Or is he so small? Or maybe underwater?

so it is at least 9-10 kilometers from there 1 nautical mile - 1852m, therefore 5 miles - 9260 km ...
Here are our scary watchtowers - how suitable for 10 kilometers, so immediately breast protection rushes to the defense!

[Number 17]

Colleague, why fine. One fly around su24 and take everything off like a hand.

[Passer]

They would come up with something new. And then somehow it becomes boring.

[33 Watcher]

Quote: Passer

They would come up with something new. And then somehow it becomes boring.

Yes, do not say ..! He locked himself ... They fire at themselves ... Really boring.

[Think so]

Indeed: "diapers", "diapers" ...
We need something new! For example, "panties with a hydraulic discharge" or "containers with feces", "automatic intra-abdominal catapult", "forced return to the body of emergency excretion", etc.
But seriously, this is a bad trend - "show-off with a weapon." One day someone's nerves will break down and ... fuck all our wit!
Sorry for the children - they live and live!

[Koshak]

Quote: I think so

Indeed: "diapers", "diapers" ...
We need something new! For example, "panties with hydraulic discharge", or "waste containers" ...

In medical practice, urine and colostomy are used.

[AUL]

Pampers were trending the year before last! Those who write about them - do not keep abreast of fashion, are hopelessly behind. Fu Fu Fu!

[Ros 56]

What can I say, all words and phrases are only non-parliamentary. Striped when lying, at least bounce.

[Sigizbarn]

And they hung the signal flag along the instagram.
Judging by the video, no signal flag is observed

[pv1005]

Quote: Sigizbarn

And they hung the signal flag along the instagram.
Judging by the video, no signal flag is observed

Especially for you:

Further, the Pentagon claims that at Yaroslav the Wise they behaved unprofessionally, announcing via radio communications that space for maneuver was limited and that the corresponding signal flag was hung out.

I’m once again translating into Russian, in Yaroslav the Wise they raised a signal according to the code of the MPPSS (international rules for preventing collisions of ships), and a video from Yaroslav the Wise too. When you photograph your wife, do you see your back in the photograph?

[kolkulon]

Fine in the form of a torpedo to the Bochin.

[kolobok63]

I think that a line of guns for a bite of these warriors would cool their ardor!

[sgazeev]

Quote: kolkulon

Fine in the form of a torpedo to the Bochin.

And now about the aircraft carriers.

Their weakest place is aircraft returning from a combat mission. The pilots are exhausted, and the fuel is running out. If at this moment you turn on the suppression systems for satellite navigation and radio communications, then the pilots will experience extreme psychological stress, since it’s a big problem to get to your floating airfield. But a real catastrophe will arise when the “friend or foe” recognition systems are turned off. The modern air defense systems of ships are based on computer technologies, which, calculating radar data, give target designation to missile and artillery systems. When the marks of their planes disappear on the radars, and some unidentifiable aircraft appear, the air defense of the warships escorting the aircraft carrier in automatic mode will open fire on them. While the commanders sort it out and give the command to cease fire, most of the aircraft will be destroyed. And the carrier group will actually cease to exist, since its main striking force will disappear.

The question is how to deliver electronic warfare systems to an aircraft carrier warrant and how to turn them on at the right time. It turned out that this is not the most difficult and completely solvable task. But it is too early to speak about this exclusive, I must say, decision.

[bad]

He (“Yaroslav the Wise”) tried to prevent the “Harry Truman” operation. The Russian ship approached the Gravely destroyer accompanying the aircraft carrier at a distance of about 300 m. At the same time, it was located approximately 5 nautical miles from the Harry Truman.

..that is, according to the mattresses, "Yaroslav the Wise" almost threatened the Aviv carrier with a battering ram? .. why .. be afraid then .. then don't complain if you bring it to sin ..

[sa-ag]

Well, what happened, judging by the video, the watchman had the opportunity to make a maneuver of evading an enemy following with a known higher speed :-)

[crumb]

here are the rules of the IPPC -72:
Section II - Navigation of vessels in full view of each other
Rule 15 - Course Crossing Situation

When two vessels with mechanical engines go intersecting courses so that there is a danger of collision, the vessel that has the other on its right side must give way to the other vessel and at the same time it should, if circumstances allow, avoid crossing the course of the other vessel nose.

[sgazeev]

Quote: croche

here are the rules of the IPPC -72:
Section II - Navigation of vessels in full view of each other
Rule 15 - Course Crossing Situation

When two vessels with mechanical engines go intersecting courses so that there is a danger of collision, the vessel that has the other on its right side must give way to the other vessel and at the same time it should, if circumstances allow, avoid crossing the course of the other vessel nose.

The rule "interference from the right" has not been canceled.

[rotmistr60]

The video clearly shows how the American "cuts" our ship. But for Americans, their behavior at sea, in the air, on the ground is non-negotiable. Those who are near are always to blame. In this incident, one can see some kind of revenge for the repeated fears of the sailors of "Donald Cook".

[_umka_]

To believe the Americans - do not respect yourself.

[Dmitry Potapov]

Nothing, nothing! SS 24 with "Khibiny" is already warming up!

[chikenous59]

Quote: Dmitry Potapov

Nothing, nothing! SS 24 with "Khibiny" is already warming up!

The Americans then were not afraid of "Khibiny", but "Bastion"

[Koshak]

Quote: Dmitry Potapov

Nothing, nothing! SS 24 with "Khibiny" is already warming up!

On the Su-24 "Khibiny" is not installed.

[atamankko]

Another master-class lies in an American way.

[Red_Hamer]

An old joke from the nineties was remembered. About the six hundredth Mercedes and the asphalt paver - Well, man, tell me. How to overtake ... how to cut ....

[Shadowcat]

I propose to give a welcome airborne salvo

[udincev]

We thought and analyzed for a long time ...
Well, if nothing shines - a trouble-free kindergarten argument: "you yourself!"

[Wolka]

the Yankees are clearly bluffing, a sort of show of strength, but gives off with obvious diarrhea ...

[darksoul]

and now read the comments of this RT video on YouTube ........ I think we Ukrainians have a real holiday, but what's there ... a feast for the whole world ... they rejoice like children

[Taygerus]

theater of the absurd

[Max repp]

It’s interesting to know if Captain Yaroslav the Wise appeared, when it became clear that this galosh crosses the course, untwist the turbines and put them in the barrel, he certainly couldn’t accelerate the ship so quickly =) but all the same, an additional amount of biomaterial from the sailors of mattresses in diapers appeared would

[Kostya Andreev]

There are no captains on warships, there are commanders. (Sorry for the amendment)

[Koshak]

Quote: Maks Repp

It’s interesting to know if Captain Yaroslav the Wise appeared when it became clear that this galosh crosses the course, spin up the turbines and give them stem to the barrel

The "Yaroslav the Wise" has a maximum speed of 30 knots, and the "Gravely" - 32

[koralvit]

When there is nothing to justify, then there is only one version, they fired at themselves. And the Ukroprygunov were taught the same, their air conditioners themselves began to explode, the militia fired at themselves. It's boring that they would come up with something new, or they don't have enough brains. "Yaroslav the Wise" presented evidence of his version, showed the unprofessional actions of your "Gravely", but where is the evidence of your words?

[Hariton laptev]

The question is, the Pentagon made a wave three days after ours dipped their nose, something did not fit their logic, usually after a couple of hours the screech was raised through all the channels and everyone sheds their snot, and then three days and then, if ours had not come out with their indignation, they would not have voiced their version. So the poor excuse, gentlemen, the Americans, each time it gets worse and worse and worse it really becomes not interesting.

[sub307]

Here, in fact, there is nothing to comment on .... It is obvious from the video that "Gravely" went to the intersection of the course of "Yaroslav the Wise", having previously accelerated.

[Warm Padded Jacket]

Zadornov has a monologue about the Spanish lighthouse and the American aircraft carrier, a similar situation)))
https://youtu.be/ql0ce2NY8GU

[K-50]

Such maneuvers can exacerbate tensions between countries.

As the saying goes from sick to healthy!
It is strange to talk about the maneuvers of a Russian watchdog, when it was the destroyer under the "mattress" that was maneuvering (overtaking, changing course and crossing the course of another ship).

The Russian ship approached the grave destroyer accompanying the aircraft carrier at a distance of about 300 m. At the same time, it was about 5 nautical miles from the Harry Truman.

And in other sources, it was the martras ship that approached the Russian at a distance of 60-70 meters on the port side and crossed the course at a distance of 180 meters, which is slightly more than the length of the ship. If it was on the road, the drivers would have come out to knock one another on the forehead for such driving, namely "undercut", as it is called. Don't go to the fortuneteller.

[newterra]

Quote: sdc_alex

Similar situation:

I neighing until you drop

[Titsen]

Quote: Andrey K

They themselves hear the nonsense that falls out of their mouths.

Bobanovskie minions and verbiage for many years already are nonsense - but they are echoed by the whole Western world ...

But China is silent ....

[mealnik2005]

Quote: sdc_alex

Dangerous driving! Merikos need to write a fine, but better to register.

I didn’t notice one aircraft carrier in the video? Or is he so small? Or maybe underwater?

In vain you jerk, 3-5 degrees to the left along the movement of the guard on the horizon something looms. Maybe an aircraft carrier.

[Jamuqa]

Did they hear anything about the interference on the right?

[sgr291158]

And how could we prevent this aircraft carrier, which was 5 miles away from us, it is not even visible.

[Forever so]

It’s a direct situation on the road, when another moodeak at the next pejo or Reno decided that you were stopping him from going. Looking at this a, I was expecting that he would start blinking with stoparas, they say, braking)))

[Vladimir Anatolyevich]

Throw a link from youtube to the pentagon. As it was in 1988 in the Black Sea. And then their memory is "girlish".

[fix]

And I wonder, "Wise" in a solo voyage?

[Sasha_Sar]

And then screeching screeching. Normal situation in the 80s of the last century. Our "Yaroslav the Wise" was tracking the AUG, while the yankers were conducting counter tracking. It's just that both of them have not been doing this for a long time (there were damn partners). Our fellows, that the first "cracked" on all channels, the Yankees did not expect this. Therefore, they digested the situation for three days and finally gave out a pearl. Given their qualifications (A la Psaki), there is no reason to be surprised.

[AlexTires]

Gringo's comments have always been distinguished by "simplicity and unpretentiousness" and there is already a grading scale - 1 psaki! In this case, this comment (with accusations) is drawn to 3 psaki! 1 psaki for "false signals" + 1 psaki for "trying to get close" + 1 psaki for "obstructing maneuvering"! For "tough sailors" (not "... moves"), evil orcs and trolls, I will explain, so be it that giving a signal is not only a limitation of your maneuvers, but also a warning to an approaching ship about the danger and inadmissibility of convergence. .. The Gringos themselves admit that ours warned them and, nevertheless, in violation of the COLREGs, decided to change course and speed ... In this case, YAM had to do something - this is absolutely normal when you are in international waters ! And one should not confuse fear with the fulfillment of the requirements of international rules or the actions of ships and aircraft in territorial waters (a sovereign 200-mile economic zone) ... Apparently the gringos forgot about this or decided that their 200 miles are the zones around their ships

Well, here, if you joke, then Yaroslav the Wise defeated Harry Truman. The World History. Bank Imperial .. .

[imugn]

At first he stood or moved slowly, then he gave a run across

[Verdun]

He (Yaroslav the Wise) was trying to interfere with the operation of Harry Truman.

There is only one way to hinder the operation of an aircraft carrier located several miles away - by drowning it with an accurate missile hit.

[Prince of Pensions]

Ah well done forum users, it is))) rzhunemagu)))

[HMR333]

it was necessary, as in Soviet times, to float the rams ea its back, let the monkeys sit on the ass hair and turn on the brain chtol nehru odd!

[Valter1364]

Judging by the minuscule professional comments, there are one hundred "hurray-patriots" for each sailor.
The mattress carrier can be seen with the naked eye even on the photograph accompanying the article, to the left at the stern of the destroyer. Now his maneuver is clear. The destroyer, crossing our course, made it clear that further rapprochement with the aircraft carrier is dangerous. At that moment, these were the direct duties of the destroyer accompanying the Harry Truman.
Our intentions are absolutely clear from everything we have seen. The ship of the Russian Navy "Yaroslav the Wise" clearly and distinctly, with its actions conveyed to the amers, "What did we put on your aircraft carrier and all of its escort!" ... and it is right!
Who cares, look at the materials related to the behavior of escort ships in the Mediterranean during the USSR. There were such graters that wow!
That's why for the most part I do not like this writing fraternity. Their task is not to give out objective information, but to zombie the population and raise the morale of one tribe in front of another.
Our fighting spirit does not need to be raised, it is already on top.

[viktor.]

and they even have an idea as Russian dangerously can drive? Americans would have become less in place in the Mediterranean

[tihonmarine]

If the destroyer "Gravely" was engaged in some kind of work, then she must exhibit signs "Restriction of the ability to maneuver" ball-diamond-ball vertically. As you can see from the video and photo, he does not carry them, but overtakes a Russian patrol. Even drivers on the road have a rule "don't be sure, don't overtake!" In my Leningrad sailor, a cadet who received an MPPS grade for a semester was expelled and sent to the Marine Corps as a "cheerful guy with a machine gun."

[Kudrevkn]

I agree with you, but here "it is his own fault ..."? Moreover, a woman "at the wheel" (steering wheel) of a destroyer? True, not a blonde, but all the same - WOMAN IS NOT A PLACE IN THE FLEET! Otherwise there will be trouble - we were burning in the center of Vladivostok (berth 33) after the "bath with a heifer" of the flagship mechanic of the squadron !? They burned strongly, but without casualties, and the EM "Discreet" (956) was then let on the "needles" because of ... the baths and women on the ship ?! That's how it happens!

[Sasha_Sar]

Sadness. That’s for sure, the women will be brought to the zugunder.

[Lester7777]

The United States in its repertoire, a response in the style of "insidious Yugoslavs meanly stand in the way of our peaceful" Tomahawks "...

[afrikanez]

Except as "shape-shifters", you will not name amerikosov. Once again, everything was thrown from a sore head to a healthy one. As they say: impudence, second happiness.

[Sergey333]

Have fun to the fullest, as in the good old days