Military Review

Opponents of Brexit intend to ask Queen Elizabeth II to use the right of veto on the results of the referendum

100
In Britain, after the announcement of the results of the referendum, the forces that the United Kingdom did not leave the EU obviously became more active. In addition to 3,5, the million votes collected in favor of the so-called “repeated referendum” as a trump card of the opponent Brekzit declare the role of the queen that she must play. The point is that the Queen of Britain is de jure considered the head of state and has the right to veto the results of the plebiscite. Moreover, the power of the queen is listed and the possibility of dissolution of parliament.

Opponents of Brexit intend to ask Queen Elizabeth II to use the right of veto on the results of the referendum


Opponents of the exit of Britain from the European Union intend to appeal to Elizabeth II with a request to exercise the right of veto. At the same time, the same persons appeal to Prime Minister Cameron to simply ignore the majority opinion, recalling that the results of the plebiscite under British law are advisory in nature.

Drawing attention to all these calls and requests to the authorities of the country of opponents of Brekzit, it can be concluded that the minority is trying to dictate conditions to the majority, which again demonstrates obvious problems in the so-called Western democracy.

If the Queen applies the right of veto or Cameron still does not consider it necessary to take into account the opinion of the majority expressed during the referendum, it will be a bell ringing on all democratic principles in modern Europe.

It is necessary to recall the precedent, when the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, Mark Rutte, declared that the official Amsterdam would ignore the results of the Dutch referendum, during which the majority of the Dutch people said Ukraine’s European integration was “no”.
Photos used:
https://twitter.com/RoyalFamily
100 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ivan Ivanych
    Ivan Ivanych 28 June 2016 16: 57
    +3
    Old chicken will do what they order
    1. Vend
      Vend 28 June 2016 17: 03
      +15
      Opponents of the exit gathered a petition, opponents of the EU will also collect a petition. So, what is next? laughing Britain has no way out. If after the referendum it does not leave the EU, then Germany will no longer hear the voice of the Saxons. This British can not tolerate.
      1. St Petrov
        St Petrov 28 June 2016 17: 09
        +18
        Old chicken will do what they order


        This chick can do whatever it wants. She has the authority to even start or end a war. And parliament can dissolve. Appoint ministers and so on. the monarch is the supreme ruler of the Church of England, and may appoint bishops and archbishops

        All parliamentary acts are adopted in the name of the monarch. Before the bill becomes law, royal consent is required

        So not everything is clear.

        Law No. 1

        Crown “can't be wrong”

        1. cniza
          cniza 28 June 2016 17: 13
          +7
          Let them do what they want, or rather, as the owner decides - the United States.
          1. St Petrov
            St Petrov 28 June 2016 17: 14
            +9
            I think England has more sovereignty than many states on this planet.

            1. St Petrov
              St Petrov 28 June 2016 17: 46
              +13
              to the minuser: I will say this, of the approximately 190 states on this planet, England is among the top ten in terms of sovereignty - that’s for sure.

              Rather, it is not a tail, but a head - in all this geopolitical catavasia

              England was always on her mind. And she always played far from the last role in world history. And in places and at times - the first. This fact alone will not allow her to accept the role of a mediocre player.

              1. Ivan Ivanych
                Ivan Ivanych 28 June 2016 17: 55
                +5
                Quote: s-t Petrov
                ... I will say this, of the approximately 190 states on this planet, England is among the top ten in terms of sovereignty - that’s for sure.

                in the top ten of what? what measured? kilometers or green parrots?)
                PS by the number of blue per capita in the first three is definitely included laughing
                1. St Petrov
                  St Petrov 28 June 2016 18: 17
                  +6
                  if you make such a rating there will be many moans and surprise in the eyes of people

                  Well, you will agree that there are countries with different sovereignty? There is Ukraine, and there is Russia. There is China - but there is Japan. There is Iraq, but there is Iran.

                  Well, you can figure out which country has sovereignty - and which one has its appearance or does not have it at all.

                  I can’t say that your humor is out of place, but my words have a right to exist.

                  England can afford what many countries can only dream of.

                  Well, the calculation of sovereignty can be done, I think. Start with owning a certain nuclear weapons country or a strong army and finish with the currency and the ability of the economy to live without external factors and donor assistance.

                  Well, making up the rating you need to take into account the story I think.



                  1. Ivan Ivanych
                    Ivan Ivanych 28 June 2016 18: 33
                    +2
                    I didn’t want to offend anyone. In a simplified form, he expressed his attitude to the ratings, as well as to those who form and distribute them). Sorry again! hi
                    1. St Petrov
                      St Petrov 28 June 2016 18: 42
                      +1
                      Yes, I have no offense at all) I just think there is a field for compiling such a rating. And you can include a lot of parameters. This is a task for the institute.

                      I'm here on the forum in very rude forms tried to convey this idea and left room for your wave of reasonable jokes)

                      PS would joke in the same way, having read such a post

                      1. The comment was deleted.
                      2. Tatyana
                        Tatyana 28 June 2016 20: 11
                        +4
                        Yes! For Elizabeth II, this is a very juicy internal political situation! Let's see how she can get out of this seemingly contradictory situation in front of her people. Most likely, she will keep the results of the referendum in force.

                        An appeal to the Queen of Great Britain Elizabeth II asking her to impose her “royal veto” on the positive results of the referendum on the country's exit from the EU is a very rather strong provocation of the “uninitiated” British to their monarch! Namely, those who sincerely advocate that Britain remain within the EU.
                        Moreover, our analytical interest in this "problem" is enhanced by the fact that Merkel has already advocated the fastest possible exit of Great Britain from the EU!
                        In this regard, it is very appropriate and interesting to once again listen to the opinion of Nikolai Starikov on the meaning of that very "exit" of Great Britain from the European Union.

                        See "Nikolai Starikov on Britain's exit from the European Union." Published: 24 Jun. 2016
                      3. Vladimir Anatolyevich
                        Vladimir Anatolyevich 29 June 2016 11: 52
                        0
                        Great stuff! The only addition that I would like to add on my own: If it is not possible to disintegrate from the inside, to draw into the war, then all this world "behind the scenes" will seek or raise its new Adolf Alloizovich. They used to carry chestnuts out of the fire with someone else's hands. I very much support the president's course towards modernizing and re-equipping our army.
                  2. igorka357
                    igorka357 29 June 2016 05: 07
                    0
                    About your picture .. the Britons attacked many countries, and where are they now? And the Russians just took themselves and grabbed the floor of the mainland, and so we live on it! The Britons have nuclear weapons, but about a strong army .. yes high-tech, but whether it’s strong, SAS I don’t argue good !!!
              2. weksha50
                weksha50 28 June 2016 20: 05
                +3
                Quote: s-t Petrov
                Rather, it is not a tail, but a head - in all this geopolitical catavasia



                Often an analogy comes to me, not with the head, but with the neck that twists this head ...

                "England was always on her mind. And she always played far from the last role in world history. And in places and at times - the first... This fact alone will prevent her from accepting the role of a mediocre player "...

                This is also confirmed by the fact that often the USA makes negative sharp movements, and Naglia quietly remains on the sidelines or behind them, reaping the fruits of her successes without advertising them ...

                PS Sly and mean fox ...
                1. Karlovar
                  Karlovar 28 June 2016 21: 45
                  0
                  I admit, there is a probability that the results of the referendum will be stolen, as in Holland ... And they will push through without Elizabeth, they will find a reason, a loud social provocation, there’s a scandal supposedly with a vote count ....
                2. Amurets
                  Amurets 28 June 2016 23: 14
                  0
                  Quote: weksha50

                  "England has always been on her mind. And she has always played an important role in world history. And in places and times - the first. This fact alone will not allow her to accept the role of a mediocre player" ...

                  Yesterday I watched the news, but for some reason showed it once. In this case, the English queen or king does not have the right to interfere in the election results. And in this case, a superficially conducted, unofficial check showed that foreign citizens participate in the requirements for the cancellation of the referendum, not having voting rights. And whoever says anything, the EU, Germany and France require a quick divorce.
              3. igorka357
                igorka357 29 June 2016 05: 02
                0
                Yes, stop it, the Mongols, the French, the Ottomans, to give more examples, or will it be enough? All these states were once the greatest, and had the first roles in world history .. and where are they now? Why do you think that shaving can’t happen same?
            2. biron
              biron 28 June 2016 18: 02
              -1
              the Saxoe Jews only have warfalameya all night and time is drawing near.
              1. rabbi's pais
                rabbi's pais 28 June 2016 18: 32
                +3
                Quote: biron
                saxo Jews

                O. Almost the correct term. I will correct a little. liquid anglo-saxons
                1. Seal
                  Seal 28 June 2016 23: 12
                  0
                  No need to adjust anything. Everything has long been corrected. To you. You, like many, for some reason forget that at the same time not two tribes, Angles and Saxons, moved to England, but three. Which third do you recall or suggest? Okay, I’m telling you. Angles, Saxons and Utes moved. Angles, Saxons and Jutes.

                  The Jutes, Iuti, or Iutæ (/ dʒuːts /)

                  Now enjoy the music: http: //www.hope-of-israel.org/p18.htm
                  'The importance of this becomes apparent when we remember that the Israel people were divided into TWO separate nations - Israel and Judah, AND that when the Assyrians conquered Israel and drove the Israelites away into captivity in MEDIA, they ALSO took some of the people from the country districts of Judah. it is certain, therefore, that among the Israelites in Media there was a distinct group who would be known by a plural form of the name Judah - Judahites, Judae, Judai, Judi, or Judes.

                  'In this connection we should note too that in the German language the Jews, who are a part of the people of Judah, are called JUDEN (singular - Jude), which, is equivalent to' Judes' in English. Further, in the Low German dialects, which are more closely related to Old English (the English of the Saxons and Jutes) the name Jude is pronounced 'Yut', which is equivalent to the English 'Jute'.

                  'We have, therefore, six known facts to consider: (1) that when the Israel people were deported to Media by the Assyrians, part of the people of the Kingdom of Judah were taken with them; (2) that, as a consequence, there was among the Israelites in Media a group of Judahites, Judai, or Judes; (3) that among the Saxons who came into Britain there was a tribe called Jutes; (4) that during the time they were migrating westward across Europe the 'd' in their language became 't'; (5) that the Saxons were descended from the Sacae of Media; and (6) that Sacae is the name by which the Israelites in Media were known to the Persian historians.

                  'It is certain, therefore, that the JUTES were originally called Judes or Judai, and that they were the descendants of that part of the people of JUDAH which the Assyrians carried away with Israel to Med
                  1. Parsec
                    Parsec 29 June 2016 00: 17
                    0
                    Is it not from the Ukrainians who are fleeing scribbling such nonsense?
                    Those, too, deduced both the Japanese and the Incas from the Prahokhlov, who left to seek a share.

                    The Jews, too, either one knee formed the Japanese, then the descendants of the deported Jews are jutes. How the ancient German yutes with their jutland turned out to be Jews, why other romantic people of that time did not carve them out, nobody knows the aliens.

                    And the next time you lay out such a piece, supply translation.
                    1. Seal
                      Seal 29 June 2016 21: 19
                      0
                      And you yourself are not able to separate the grain from the chaff? Yes, it can be written too much. But the main thing is easy to highlight.
                      a) the 'd' in their language became 't' - that is, once the Utahs were called, as they should be - Yudami. But then for some reason the German languages ​​D began to change to T and the Yudas became Utes. The question is why? Not for the sake of these same Yutes-Yuds?
                      b) It is directly recognized that the name Judah is Judahites, Judae, Judai, Judi, or Judes. That is, the Yudas are precisely the Jews, and not some similar ones.
                      c) How did the Jews see the "promised land"? Like a land where there is a lot of greenery, and rivers flow with milk and honey. We look at Jutlandia itself - Judeland, that is, at present-day Denmark. How is Denmark different? Yes, first of all, very dairy production. Moreover, Denmark is traditionally a dairy country. And if the country is dairy, then there is where to graze cattle. That is, there were beautiful clover meadows. So there were bees and there was honey. And even now they say about Denmark - butter-milk-honey. That is, the biblical Jews, dreaming of the future promised land, did not fantasize - they simply recalled their former land, which for some reason they had to leave. The reason, by the way, may be the most trivial - the Gulf Stream has moved further north, melted a little more Arctic ice than before - and now it is a "global flood", flat Denmark goes under water. Not all of them, of course, but decent.

                      So the puzzles add up hi

                      However, it is likely that the region of their (Jews) settlement was wider than the territory of present-day Denmark. Since there is also the "Holy Land" nearby, also flowing with milk and honey. This is Holy Land. I mean Holland. And which also periodically went under water.

                      Do you see? It is not necessary at the sight of something that at first glance seems unreasonable and wrong - to panic and grotesque. You just need to take a closer look.
              2. Amurets
                Amurets 28 June 2016 23: 25
                0
                Quote: biron
                the Saxoe Jews only have warfalameya all night and time is drawing near.

                Bartholomew’s night was in France and Catholics and Huguenots understood each other. D0% 93% D1
                % 8B
            3. The comment was deleted.
          2. vorobey
            vorobey 28 June 2016 17: 38
            +10
            Quote: cniza
            Let them do what they want, or rather, as the owner decides - the United States.



            This is precisely what rules London, and the USA is a tool in the hands of a shoemaker ...
          3. SMikhalych
            SMikhalych 28 June 2016 19: 09
            +1
            Quote: cniza
            Let them do what they want, or rather, as the owner decides - the United States.

            Absolute ignorance of history. The United States was never the host for Great Britain. The historical triumvirate: Great Britain-Vatican-USA, where Great Britain has ALWAYS been the predominant role, the US plays the role of gendarme and the Vatican is engaged in ideology.
            But to understand this, you need to make a little mental effort, and sofa marshals are not always able to bully
            1. joopel
              joopel 28 June 2016 20: 18
              +2
              In general, they said everything correctly, but the last two lines are very unpleasant. Why are you all so reserved it? Even if you are from GREAT thinkers, you must be smarter, more modest, with all your unrecognized and underestimated genius.
        2. Persistent
          Persistent 28 June 2016 17: 16
          +4
          Crowds of Europeans roam Europe and ask each other the only question:
          “Are you coming out next year?” laughing

          Not those fans were beaten at the 2016 European Championships! It was necessary to beat the Germans, then Germany would leave the EU, and not Great Britain. laughing
        3. NIKNN
          NIKNN 28 June 2016 17: 25
          +7
          Well, if the Queen is to be discredited, then this is an encroachment on the monarchy, what will remain with small Britain? It’s easier than Cameron to sniff, anyway the pawn is lost. But the essence is interesting in the sense of whether the monarchy will win? For tee Britain, this is a matter of honor. We will see.
        4. Ivan Ivanych
          Ivan Ivanych 28 June 2016 17: 26
          0
          Well, let's see)
        5. Skif83
          Skif83 28 June 2016 18: 26
          0
          Well, in fact, the queen is played by the "Belderberg" retinue.
          She can only think that she is managing something, however, like most heads of state.
          The point, in my opinion, is different.
          A typical way out of the "slightly pregnant" situation.
          First we hold a referendum, and then when we don’t like the results, we start to excuse ourselves: - maybe London will maintain its status in the EU, or maybe we will repeat the referendum, or maybe carefully listen to a smaller portion of those who voted ... ???
          We, in fact, also passed this in the 1990th.
          So who rules the world? wassat
          1. nika407
            nika407 28 June 2016 23: 14
            0
            It just seems to me that the results of the referendum were not so unpredictable. Something tells me that the next performance is being played on the world stage. At the same time, everyone remains at his own: England gains sovereignty, the EU intimidates and unites all its countries. People see an interesting action: the struggle and the suffering of the Britons to rupture the aorta. But England safely avoids refugees and economic collapse in this case. And Merkel’s faithful dog helps England get out of the EU faster.
        6. A.Anatol
          A.Anatol 28 June 2016 20: 43
          0
          Quote: c-Petrov
          So not everything is clear.

          YES! on the one hand, she needs to be commanded by her subjects
          not subject to the queen "fuck who understands"
        7. spech
          spech 29 June 2016 03: 41
          0
          She has the power to even start a war or end it. And parliament can dissolve.

          Here is such a funny thing "democracy" repeat
        8. igorka357
          igorka357 29 June 2016 04: 59
          0
          You said everything correctly, she can do whatever she wants, she is a queen, but ... she hasn’t done it for a very long time and will not do it! It's just like a rarity, like a monument in Britain .. it's like an old great-great-grandfather hat that lies in closet, crumbles from old age .. but it is a pity to throw it out, because this is the memory of the roots!
      2. sgazeev
        sgazeev 28 June 2016 17: 57
        +9
        Quote: Wend
        Opponents of the exit gathered a petition, opponents of the EU will also collect a petition. So, what is next? laughing Britain has no way out. If after the referendum it does not leave the EU, then Germany will no longer hear the voice of the Saxons. This British can not tolerate.

        The representative of France’s famous political surname Le Penov, Marion Le Pen, has sarcastically criticized the vote on a new referendum on Britain’s secession from the European Union. The deputy of the National Assembly posted a scandalous video on her page on the social network, on which she fills out a questionnaire on the website of the Government of the Kingdom.

        First, in the column “Are you a British citizen”, the Frenchwoman ticks off without hesitation, and then completely signs with the name of Napoleon Bonaparte. Her voice was counted as a result. Thus, according to Marion Le Pen, anyone can sign the petition, so it “has no value.”
      3. Revolver
        Revolver 28 June 2016 18: 25
        +3
        Quote: Wend
        Germany will no longer hear the voice of the Aglosaxians

        In fact, it was Germany, or rather Merkel personally, who made the mess. She blurted out without thinking that Germany would accept all those in need of asylum. And when the number of refugees went to hundreds of thousands, and in the future millions were looming, she backed up, but okay like "we no longer accept", but no - "we will accept, but other EU countries are obliged to fairly share the burden." And other countries do not want, especially Britain - they have enough of their own, from the British Commonwealth, packs and Nigerians oh, sorry, it turned out not politically correct, it was necessary to "African Americans", but the essence is still the same - the Arabs did not give the fuck to them. As a Frenchman said about the Germans, "First they exterminated OUR Jews, and now Merkel is trying to impose on us HIS Negroes and Arabs." Well, in Britain, they voted to leave the problem of refugees and all other migrants on the other side of the strait.
      4. sergey2017
        sergey2017 28 June 2016 19: 05
        +2
        They will not succeed in canceling the results of the referendum! Now they have Zugzwang (German Zugzwang literally “forced to move”) - a chess position in which any player’s move leads to a deterioration of his position (situation)!
    2. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 28 June 2016 17: 22
      +5
      Look at this little family .. Lord, what senility! And they also have to make some decisions ..
      1. Strezhevchanin
        Strezhevchanin 28 June 2016 20: 32
        0
        Quote: dmi.pris
        Look at this little family .. Lord, what senility! And they also have to make some decisions ..

        How else? Etozh karma !!!
    3. sgazeev
      sgazeev 28 June 2016 17: 55
      +7
      Quote: Ivan Ivanovich
      Old chicken will do what they order

      The old chicken has oatmeal up to the grave, she doesn’t need noise. Dermocracy is first and foremost. Britain Kanesha is not the mistress of the seas, but will live hanging out like a substance in an ice hole.
      1. Ivan Ivanych
        Ivan Ivanych 28 June 2016 18: 01
        0
        Absolutely agree! let it peck)
    4. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 28 June 2016 18: 22
      +2
      Quote: Ivan Ivanovich
      Old chicken will do what they order

      I would say: she will do what is right.
      And it will be correct to withdraw England from the EU.
      1. Migrants trample the EU, a competitor to the United States. And England is all in white.
      2. The TAPok agreement with the USA and the EU will be on one condition, with England on others.
      3. Previously, England looked after the EU, now maybe pro-Poland Poland will advance their interests.
      Yes, and much more ...
    5. Nyrobsky
      Nyrobsky 28 June 2016 18: 57
      +2
      Quote: Ivan Ivanovich
      Old chicken will do what they order

      I doubt that she really needs Europe with millions of refugees and an external debt comparable to the US debt of 19 trillion dollars ...
      Died so dead)))
      They will simply settle down the possible problems associated with the exit and will observe the further development of chaos in Europe from the side, washing down with dark Irish ale.
    6. Dam
      Dam 28 June 2016 19: 06
      +1
      Oh oh Wasn't she muddied all this?
      1. Seal
        Seal 29 June 2016 00: 21
        0
        Why not her? Everything can be !!! To die - so with the music !!! In the end, at least something to do !!!
    7. Homo
      Homo 28 June 2016 20: 51
      +1
      Quote: Ivan Ivanovich
      Old chicken will do what they order

      But not a fact. She already thinks more about the spiritual than the worldly. And there, by other standards, they consider merit. Many before leaving for another world surprised with their decisions. repeat
      1. okunevich_rv
        okunevich_rv 29 June 2016 06: 49
        0
        There is only one road to Carvinus’s relative.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    8. Blondy
      Blondy 29 June 2016 03: 45
      0
      Well, that’s what I would call names. Could you indicate (with your finger) who can order something to the elderly queen with her authority? Especially if the queen herself is among the Eurosceptics. I quote myself again
      Blondy RU Yesterday, 10:46 | The authorities of Germany and France announced the need to reform the European Union
      Interesting detail: The Queen of England, apparently. also included in the number of eurosceptics:
      Officially, Elizabeth II keeps aloof from political discussions. Buckingham Palace did not comment on the results of the referendum. Nevertheless, British journalists have repeatedly reported that the Queen is one of the Eurosceptics. Another confirmation of this appeared on the eve of the referendum. As the personal biographer of the monarch Robert Lacey said, at a dinner party she turned to the guests with the question: "Give me three good reasons why Britain should remain part of Europe." According to Lacey, Elizabeth II loves such conversations with guests, and this remark “was thrown across the table like a pin-pong ball.” (Https://rg.ru/2016/06/28/korola-elizaveta-ii-poshutila- o-svoem-

      zdorove.html)

      By the way, and Cameron said that he was not going to hold a second referendum yet another self-cirtation
      Although Cameron has already cast out a second Brexit
      David Cameron rules out second EU referendum after Brexit
      Dismissing a popular petition, Prime Minister's spokesperson says another vote is 'not remotely on the cards' (// www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-what-is-eu-refe
      rendum-petition-david-cameron-a7105596.html)

      Nevertheless - I am still skeptical that Britain will leave the EU - there are too many troubles, up to the breakaway of Scotland with Seven Ireland, and, in principle, no one is ready for Britain to turn into a nasty England with them .
    9. Maki Avellevich
      Maki Avellevich 29 June 2016 06: 09
      0
      Old chicken will do what they order


      the kingdom of England is not the queen of Belgium or Spain there, she has real power.
      For example, the Queen of England has the right to start a war with anyone she wants, parliament’s permission is not required.
      also she can dissolve this pallment if she wants.

      the chicken is old of course, but it looks like she orders there.
    10. Weyland
      Weyland 30 June 2016 01: 30
      0
      Quote: Ivan Ivanovich
      Old chicken

      is a member of the Bilderberg Club - unlike Maxim. So who will whom and what will be ordered is still unknown!
    11. The comment was deleted.
  2. Vladimirets
    Vladimirets 28 June 2016 16: 57
    +2
    "European integration of Ukraine"

    A misprint according to Freud, "European integration" is exactly what Ukraine will achieve in the end. laughing Damn, already fixed. recourse
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 28 June 2016 17: 40
      +5
      Quote: Vladimirets
      Typo by Freud,


      Zheka hi ... according to Freud it would sound like this ... an associate member wants to integrate more deeply into Europe .. repeat
      1. Vladimirets
        Vladimirets 28 June 2016 19: 15
        +1
        Quote: vorobey
        associate member wants to integrate deeper into Europe ..

        This mood is lyrical, and here again you, my friend, with your indecencies. No.
        Great, shovel. drinks
  3. Irokez
    Irokez 28 June 2016 16: 58
    +5
    No - "She died so died."
  4. Titsen
    Titsen 28 June 2016 17: 02
    +5
    So Grandma was needed!
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 28 June 2016 17: 50
      +2
      exercise the right of veto on referendum results

      True democracy hi
      1. Rokossovsky
        Rokossovsky 28 June 2016 18: 04
        +3

        True democracy

        Schrodinger democracy, I would say ... hi
    2. Mister22408
      Mister22408 28 June 2016 22: 45
      0
      Do not confuse the cliches at the bankers ;-)
  5. HAM
    HAM 28 June 2016 17: 03
    +4
    HAM (2) RU 24 June 2016 15:24
    Not yet evening,Yankees will tell HOW to correctly count incorrect results, 2-3 %% this is a statistical error "that they are suspiciously silent for a long time, are they going to ATO or what?

    In, it’s come! There were clues. Democracy, it is so, evil.
  6. Mengad
    Mengad 28 June 2016 17: 06
    +5
    The Queen herself is against the EU. But most likely she will be neutral in this matter.
    1. Vend
      Vend 28 June 2016 17: 37
      +4
      Quote: Mengad
      The Queen herself is against the EU. But most likely she will be neutral in this matter.

      I think so too. It is enough to recall her reaction after the referendum on Scotland.
    2. sgazeev
      sgazeev 28 June 2016 18: 05
      0
      Quote: Mengad
      The Queen herself is against the EU. But most likely she will be neutral in this matter.

      She is a consumer patriot, she eats, drinks, reads only British. And German sausages do not crawl into her, just as she was a volunteer during the war.
  7. AlexTires
    AlexTires 28 June 2016 17: 07
    +3
    Everything can be - the Queen of Great Britain heads all three branches of power, her powers are limited not by law, but by custom, so a feint must come up with some kind of ...
  8. ALEA IACTA EST
    ALEA IACTA EST 28 June 2016 17: 12
    +5
    And they call Russia totalitarian.
  9. Holsten
    Holsten 28 June 2016 17: 15
    +11
    The veto of results is absurd. You cannot forbid a fact, but you can not give a damn about it.
  10. Simon
    Simon 28 June 2016 17: 17
    +2
    And what - does it help? What queen will go against the people? Already in the Middle Ages there was one revolution in England, then the royal dynasty was regretted. request
  11. 1536
    1536 28 June 2016 17: 18
    +4
    Somehow, somehow the British have no motions. It’s not necessary to set fire to tires at Buckingham Palace, or to arrange supporters or opponents of a talk show on the BBC, with massacre, jiu-jitsu techniques, etc. In the parliament you have to fight. But it’s not interesting when the Lords do not lord crap, it’s better when the other way around.
    In a word, the people are silent! And they said that the British have democracy in the blood, that they will not sacrifice their interests. But in reality, like bugs, they crawled under the blanket, hid under the skirt of the old queen, and asked, give us something to make it good.
    The fact that the rest of the world no longer wants to be robbed, plundered and destroyed by the British does not reach them.
  12. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 28 June 2016 17: 19
    +3
    Nothing decisive parasite and old nag! As I understand it, she has the right to throw most of her subjects, and that this is “democracy?” This is more like despotism, although I am not surprised at anything in the West, they are ready to apply double standards even at home, morons, damn!
    1. sgazeev
      sgazeev 28 June 2016 18: 15
      +1
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      Nothing decisive parasite and old nag! As I understand it, she has the right to throw most of her subjects, and that this is “democracy?” This is more like despotism, although I am not surprised at anything in the West, they are ready to apply double standards even at home, morons, damn!
  13. cyberhanter
    cyberhanter 28 June 2016 17: 19
    -2
    Article minus. Majority and minority - 48 vs 52 percent? :) This is not a majority or a minority, it is a split in public opinion. IMHO, such decisions should be made with the vast majority, say 70 vs 30. So the veto is just logical
    1. kotvov
      kotvov 28 June 2016 18: 16
      -1
      taken overwhelmingly, say 70 vs 30,
      so what's the question, drop a letter to the League of Sex Minorities, I think you will be supported there.
      1. cyberhanter
        cyberhanter 29 June 2016 08: 56
        0
        but what does it have to do with it? :) THERE if a referendum in the Russian Federation were now held for dividing into several parts and 51 percent would vote for, would you agree? I think that such decisions cannot be taken only by a simple majority.
  14. A-Sim
    A-Sim 28 June 2016 17: 19
    +2
    "Here's your wet - start over ..."
  15. beer-youk
    beer-youk 28 June 2016 17: 22
    +8
    Quote: Holsten
    You cannot forbid a fact, but you can not give a damn about it.


    Sorry for the repeat. "Civilized" Western "democracy" recognizes the results of only those referendums that were not held (Kosovo), and openly spits on the results of those held (USSR, Crimea, Greece, the Netherlands). I see no reason for anything to change!
  16. Orionvit
    Orionvit 28 June 2016 17: 23
    +4
    There is a lot of debate, but as they say, we will see. The fact is that we all do not own the quantity and quality of information in order to predict the further development of events. However, the trends are very interesting. Let's hope this is the beginning of the end of the Western world.
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 28 June 2016 23: 40
      +1
      Quote: Orionvit
      There is a lot of debate, but as they say, we will see. The fact is that we all do not own the quantity and quality of information in order to predict the further development of events. However, the trends are very interesting. Let's hope this is the beginning of the end of the Western world.

      I agree in many ways, but not in everything. If the Western world ends, the Eastern ends too. Because no peaceful outcome is expected here. To predict anything in this situation is ungrateful.
  17. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 28 June 2016 17: 28
    +1
    And the queen is listening and eating! wassat
  18. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 28 June 2016 17: 29
    +3
    And yet the queen can do anything, but it will not be royal to go against the majority. Although in the West it is possible that all and any actions will be justified, including spitting on the will of the majority, but then the queen will end like something meaningful in England. What are we going to look at all this tram-taram in a smelly geyropa.
  19. Siberia 9444
    Siberia 9444 28 June 2016 17: 29
    +2
    I think she herself does not mind that England would leave the EU. Soon, the elections in France and the cockerel Hollande will fly him all the French will remember, and then Grandma Merkel will sit in the puddle booty.
  20. RuslanNN
    RuslanNN 28 June 2016 17: 32
    +4
    The veto on the results of the referendum is to officially put the BOLT on the opinion of the majority of the population. Democracy, however.
  21. samarin1969
    samarin1969 28 June 2016 17: 35
    +2
    Yeah! Though parliamentary - but MONARCHY!
  22. Kibl
    Kibl 28 June 2016 17: 37
    0
    So like the queen-grandmother herself was not against jumping off a trolley called the EU.
    1. dchegrinec
      dchegrinec 28 June 2016 17: 42
      +1
      And she didn’t jump off her, she left on her laughing
  23. cherkas.oe
    cherkas.oe 28 June 2016 17: 39
    0
    She will not impose any veto. Because this whole referendum was prepared so quickly and at lightning speed to cover up another financial scam that fat financial cats are preparing to carry out on both sides of the puddle, and this scam will break out not late September - October, just before the elections in n = i-nd -os ai. And the responsibility for the next financial crisis will be put on a referendum and "Brexit". And the old woman is not just aware, she is in the share of the upcoming derban. And what is the point of her disrupting the cover operation?
  24. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 28 June 2016 17: 42
    +1
    they don’t know which stick to insert into which wheel, damn Democrats.
  25. Olezhek
    Olezhek 28 June 2016 17: 58
    +2
    In vain they are like this: the queen - she’s on her mind ...
    And FIG knows him - on whose side is she.
    Although it is so British: in a difficult moment to appeal to Her Majesty ...
  26. HAM
    HAM 28 June 2016 17: 59
    +3
    Quote: Expelling Liberoids
    And the queen is listening and eating! wassat



    Yes, she only needs: kefir, klystir and a warm toilet ...... Do not torment the grandmother!
  27. behemot
    behemot 28 June 2016 18: 07
    +1
    democracy ah. The lies of false creatures.
  28. Makarov
    Makarov 28 June 2016 18: 39
    0
    It will not be a bell ... as they worked against their enemies in the name of domination in the whole world, and will continue to do so ... this is bullshit Bexit. With or without the EU, Britain is as much a mediator of the will of the overseas master as the EU ... this is the usual division of powers between its vassals and the "will of the people" like the "queen" is the tenth thing ...
  29. max15243
    max15243 28 June 2016 18: 49
    +1
    The situation with the UK referendum is not so simple. Before that, there was a referendum in Scotland, as a result of which Cameron got off with a slight fright. Now he needed a referendum to influence Brussels, so that he would carry out a series of reforms in the EU in the interests of the United States. The refugee crisis has shown that the EU is not ready for a prompt and effective solution to emerging problems. In Europe, there is no clarity of positions on the solution of common European problems. They are trying to consolidate the EU, to make a clear system of European subordination. Now the EU is a ship with 28 captains who are collectively trying to manage, but they are not yet ready for one-man management (the supremacy of one European "captain") because of national interests. The clumsy bureaucratic machine of the EU was beneficial to the United States as long as there were long-term tasks, now there is a political exacerbation of the situation in the world and delaying a decision is worse than making a timely "wrong" decision.
  30. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 28 June 2016 19: 13
    +2
    England has two months to decide. What it will be, we can only guess now. There are three options, wash my eyes:
    1. It turns out that the EU is shaken for a long time and dies.
    2. It doesn’t come out, the EU is reformatted and becomes less politicized.
    3. The EU surrenders under the pressure of the situation and England dictates its terms to Brussels.

    In either of these scenarios, England wins by securing concessions from the EU or raises its rating in Europe.

    But what we win or lose is another question. The main thing is how to get the most out of this situation ?!
  31. Banderas
    Banderas 28 June 2016 19: 18
    +2
    First Brexit, then Frexit ...
  32. SMikhalych
    SMikhalych 28 June 2016 19: 19
    +3
    In Britain, after the announcement of the results of the referendum, the forces that want the United Kingdom to not leave the EU have clearly intensified.

    And at that time ... President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko sent invitations to EU leaders to visit Belovezhskaya Pushcha, look around ... laughing
  33. Olegater
    Olegater 28 June 2016 19: 35
    +1
    And for all these bastards nothing. What they want is what they do. They wanted to give the word - it went something wrong or took the word. And what are they embarrassed about? it is to local aborigines but not to them so great wassat . All that they stir up all sorts of referenda is a complete pit with brown substance and stinks from this island, both literally and figuratively. But the conclusion is that if a country wants to be strong, it is necessary to do what is needed for this country and people, and not to pay attention to all the cryo-defenders and politicians bought over the hill and ignore any screams in another case (threaten something economically, politically and militaryly).
  34. masiya
    masiya 28 June 2016 21: 47
    0
    How interesting is that, skazamshi - "A" should be said "B" .. after all, the people cannot understand, sho and where and what the authorities want ... this English-language MOV especially infuriates ..., in general, kaklov's brains are crawling. .. about scho .. and how to live after that?
  35. Art777
    Art777 28 June 2016 22: 04
    +1
    What a good example of "democracy" ..- the minority demands auto-territorialism! :))
  36. Arkan
    Arkan 28 June 2016 23: 10
    0
    In the photo, Baba Lisa and the Prince Consort, especially he, like from a horror movie, "the undead revived." Let's see what the English grandmother has to say.
  37. Nehist
    Nehist 28 June 2016 23: 13
    +1
    Britain has always treated the EU with irony and constantly emphasized its special status by putting sticks in the wheels of this very European Union. It is the EU that has always cried that Britain is against one decision or another. So the EU itself is joyfully waiting for Britain to quit and stop torpedoing the laws and regulations common to the entire EU with its special status, creating precedents to which these or other EU members then refer.
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 29 June 2016 00: 11
      0
      Quote: Nehist
      So the EU itself is joyfully waiting for Britain to quit and stop torpedoing the laws and regulations common to the entire EU with its special status, creating precedents to which these or other EU members then refer.

      That's right! England cannot help but forget that, a hundred years ago, it was a great empire, over which the sun did not set. And I was surprised to learn that the British Commonwealth still exists and is formally led by the Queen of England.
      http://fb.ru/article/166150/sodrujestvo-natsiy-spisok-stran
      And now, using its institutions around the world, England is putting sticks in those EU decisions that are not beneficial to England.
  38. Zomanus
    Zomanus 29 June 2016 05: 11
    0
    I got the feeling that the British voted to leave the EU purely for fun.
    And only after the results became known, they began to understand what they were facing in the future.
    It goes without saying that some then decided to re-vote.
    It is very reminiscent of the collapse of the Union. In the beginning, too, everything was "for fun."
    The dudes gathered in a forest, signed something ...
    How long did it take to realize that "unprintable"
    into which all this has poured?
  39. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 29 June 2016 09: 41
    0
    Mark Rutte said that official Amsterdam will ignore the results of the Dutch referendum, during which most of the Dutch said no to Ukraine’s European integration.

    No, take it away !!!