Opponents of Brexit intend to ask Queen Elizabeth II to use the right of veto on the results of the referendum

In Britain, after the announcement of the results of the referendum, the forces that the United Kingdom did not leave the EU obviously became more active. In addition to 3,5, the million votes collected in favor of the so-called “repeated referendum” as a trump card of the opponent Brekzit declare the role of the queen that she must play. The point is that the Queen of Britain is de jure considered the head of state and has the right to veto the results of the plebiscite. Moreover, the power of the queen is listed and the possibility of dissolution of parliament.

Opponents of the exit of Britain from the European Union intend to appeal to Elizabeth II with a request to exercise the right of veto. At the same time, the same persons appeal to Prime Minister Cameron to simply ignore the majority opinion, recalling that the results of the plebiscite under British law are advisory in nature.

Drawing attention to all these calls and requests to the authorities of the country of opponents of Brekzit, it can be concluded that the minority is trying to dictate conditions to the majority, which again demonstrates obvious problems in the so-called Western democracy.

If the Queen applies the right of veto or Cameron still does not consider it necessary to take into account the opinion of the majority expressed during the referendum, it will be a bell ringing on all democratic principles in modern Europe.

It is necessary to recall the precedent, when the Prime Minister of the Netherlands, Mark Rutte, declared that the official Amsterdam would ignore the results of the Dutch referendum, during which the majority of the Dutch people said Ukraine’s European integration was “no”.

Comments

[Ivan Ivanych]

Old chicken will do what they order

[Vend]

Opponents of the exit gathered a petition, opponents of the EU will also collect a petition. So, what is next? Britain has no way out. If after the referendum it does not leave the EU, then Germany will no longer hear the voice of the Saxons. This British can not tolerate.

[St Petrov]

Old chicken will do what they order

This chick can do whatever it wants. She has the authority to even start or end a war. And parliament can dissolve. Appoint ministers and so on. the monarch is the supreme ruler of the Church of England, and may appoint bishops and archbishops

All parliamentary acts are adopted in the name of the monarch. Before the bill becomes law, royal consent is required

So not everything is clear.

Law No. 1

Crown “can't be wrong”

[cniza]

Let them do what they want, or rather, as the owner decides - the United States.

[St Petrov]

I think England has more sovereignty than many states on this planet.

[St Petrov]

to the minuser: I will say this, of the approximately 190 states on this planet, England is among the top ten in terms of sovereignty - that’s for sure.

Rather, it is not a tail, but a head - in all this geopolitical catavasia

England was always on her mind. And she always played far from the last role in world history. And in places and at times - the first. This fact alone will not allow her to accept the role of a mediocre player.

[Ivan Ivanych]

Quote: s-t Petrov

... I will say this, of the approximately 190 states on this planet, England is among the top ten in terms of sovereignty - that’s for sure.

in the top ten of what? what measured? kilometers or green parrots?)
PS by the number of blue per capita in the first three is definitely included

[St Petrov]

if you make such a rating there will be many moans and surprise in the eyes of people

Well, you will agree that there are countries with different sovereignty? There is Ukraine, and there is Russia. There is China - but there is Japan. There is Iraq, but there is Iran.

Well, you can figure out which country has sovereignty - and which one has its appearance or does not have it at all.

I can’t say that your humor is out of place, but my words have a right to exist.

England can afford what many countries can only dream of.

Well, the calculation of sovereignty can be done, I think. Start with owning a certain nuclear weapons country or a strong army and finish with the currency and the ability of the economy to live without external factors and donor assistance.

Well, making up the rating you need to take into account the story I think.

[Ivan Ivanych]

I didn’t want to offend anyone. In a simplified form, he expressed his attitude to the ratings, as well as to those who form and distribute them). Sorry again!

[St Petrov]

Yes, I have no offense at all) I just think there is a field for compiling such a rating. And you can include a lot of parameters. This is a task for the institute.

I'm here on the forum in very rude forms tried to convey this idea and left room for your wave of reasonable jokes)

PS would joke in the same way, having read such a post

[Tatyana]

Yes! For Elizabeth II, this is a very juicy internal political situation! Let's see how she can get out of this seemingly contradictory situation in front of her people. Most likely, she will keep the results of the referendum in force.

An appeal to the Queen of Great Britain Elizabeth II asking her to impose her “royal veto” on the positive results of the referendum on the country's exit from the EU is a very rather strong provocation of the “uninitiated” British to their monarch! Namely, those who sincerely advocate that Britain remain within the EU.
Moreover, our analytical interest in this "problem" is enhanced by the fact that Merkel has already advocated the fastest possible exit of Great Britain from the EU!
In this regard, it is very appropriate and interesting to once again listen to the opinion of Nikolai Starikov on the meaning of that very "exit" of Great Britain from the European Union.

See "Nikolai Starikov on Britain's exit from the European Union." Published: 24 Jun. 2016

[Vladimir Anatolyevich]

Great stuff! The only addition that I would like to add on my own: If it is not possible to disintegrate from the inside, to draw into the war, then all this world "behind the scenes" will seek or raise its new Adolf Alloizovich. They used to carry chestnuts out of the fire with someone else's hands. I very much support the president's course towards modernizing and re-equipping our army.

[igorka357]

About your picture .. the Britons attacked many countries, and where are they now? And the Russians just took themselves and grabbed the floor of the mainland, and so we live on it! The Britons have nuclear weapons, but about a strong army .. yes high-tech, but whether it’s strong, SAS I don’t argue good !!!

[weksha50]

Quote: s-t Petrov

Rather, it is not a tail, but a head - in all this geopolitical catavasia

Often an analogy comes to me, not with the head, but with the neck that twists this head ...

"England was always on her mind. And she always played far from the last role in world history. And in places and at times - the first... This fact alone will prevent her from accepting the role of a mediocre player "...

This is also confirmed by the fact that often the USA makes negative sharp movements, and Naglia quietly remains on the sidelines or behind them, reaping the fruits of her successes without advertising them ...

PS Sly and mean fox ...

[Karlovar]

I admit, there is a probability that the results of the referendum will be stolen, as in Holland ... And they will push through without Elizabeth, they will find a reason, a loud social provocation, there’s a scandal supposedly with a vote count ....

[Amurets]

Quote: weksha50

"England has always been on her mind. And she has always played an important role in world history. And in places and times - the first. This fact alone will not allow her to accept the role of a mediocre player" ...

Yesterday I watched the news, but for some reason showed it once. In this case, the English queen or king does not have the right to interfere in the election results. And in this case, a superficially conducted, unofficial check showed that foreign citizens participate in the requirements for the cancellation of the referendum, not having voting rights. And whoever says anything, the EU, Germany and France require a quick divorce.

[igorka357]

Yes, stop it, the Mongols, the French, the Ottomans, to give more examples, or will it be enough? All these states were once the greatest, and had the first roles in world history .. and where are they now? Why do you think that shaving can’t happen same?

[biron]

the Saxoe Jews only have warfalameya all night and time is drawing near.

[rabbi's pais]

Quote: biron

saxo Jews

O. Almost the correct term. I will correct a little. liquid anglo-saxons

[Seal]

No need to adjust anything. Everything has long been corrected. To you. You, like many, for some reason forget that at the same time not two tribes, Angles and Saxons, moved to England, but three. Which third do you recall or suggest? Okay, I’m telling you. Angles, Saxons and Utes moved. Angles, Saxons and Jutes.

The Jutes, Iuti, or Iutæ (/ dʒuːts /)

Now enjoy the music: http: //www.hope-of-israel.org/p18.htm

'The importance of this becomes apparent when we remember that the Israel people were divided into TWO separate nations - Israel and Judah, AND that when the Assyrians conquered Israel and drove the Israelites away into captivity in MEDIA, they ALSO took some of the people from the country districts of Judah. it is certain, therefore, that among the Israelites in Media there was a distinct group who would be known by a plural form of the name Judah - Judahites, Judae, Judai, Judi, or Judes.

'In this connection we should note too that in the German language the Jews, who are a part of the people of Judah, are called JUDEN (singular - Jude), which, is equivalent to' Judes' in English. Further, in the Low German dialects, which are more closely related to Old English (the English of the Saxons and Jutes) the name Jude is pronounced 'Yut', which is equivalent to the English 'Jute'.

'We have, therefore, six known facts to consider: (1) that when the Israel people were deported to Media by the Assyrians, part of the people of the Kingdom of Judah were taken with them; (2) that, as a consequence, there was among the Israelites in Media a group of Judahites, Judai, or Judes; (3) that among the Saxons who came into Britain there was a tribe called Jutes; (4) that during the time they were migrating westward across Europe the 'd' in their language became 't'; (5) that the Saxons were descended from the Sacae of Media; and (6) that Sacae is the name by which the Israelites in Media were known to the Persian historians.

'It is certain, therefore, that the JUTES were originally called Judes or Judai, and that they were the descendants of that part of the people of JUDAH which the Assyrians carried away with Israel to Med

[Parsec]

Is it not from the Ukrainians who are fleeing scribbling such nonsense?
Those, too, deduced both the Japanese and the Incas from the Prahokhlov, who left to seek a share.

The Jews, too, either one knee formed the Japanese, then the descendants of the deported Jews are jutes. How the ancient German yutes with their jutland turned out to be Jews, why other romantic people of that time did not carve them out, nobody knows the aliens.

And the next time you lay out such a piece, supply translation.

[Seal]

And you yourself are not able to separate the grain from the chaff? Yes, it can be written too much. But the main thing is easy to highlight.
a) the 'd' in their language became 't' - that is, once the Utahs were called, as they should be - Yudami. But then for some reason the German languages ​​D began to change to T and the Yudas became Utes. The question is why? Not for the sake of these same Yutes-Yuds?
b) It is directly recognized that the name Judah is Judahites, Judae, Judai, Judi, or Judes. That is, the Yudas are precisely the Jews, and not some similar ones.
c) How did the Jews see the "promised land"? Like a land where there is a lot of greenery, and rivers flow with milk and honey. We look at Jutlandia itself - Judeland, that is, at present-day Denmark. How is Denmark different? Yes, first of all, very dairy production. Moreover, Denmark is traditionally a dairy country. And if the country is dairy, then there is where to graze cattle. That is, there were beautiful clover meadows. So there were bees and there was honey. And even now they say about Denmark - butter-milk-honey. That is, the biblical Jews, dreaming of the future promised land, did not fantasize - they simply recalled their former land, which for some reason they had to leave. The reason, by the way, may be the most trivial - the Gulf Stream has moved further north, melted a little more Arctic ice than before - and now it is a "global flood", flat Denmark goes under water. Not all of them, of course, but decent.

So the puzzles add up

However, it is likely that the region of their (Jews) settlement was wider than the territory of present-day Denmark. Since there is also the "Holy Land" nearby, also flowing with milk and honey. This is Holy Land. I mean Holland. And which also periodically went under water.

Do you see? It is not necessary at the sight of something that at first glance seems unreasonable and wrong - to panic and grotesque. You just need to take a closer look.

[Amurets]

Quote: biron

the Saxoe Jews only have warfalameya all night and time is drawing near.

Bartholomew’s night was in France and Catholics and Huguenots understood each other. D0% 93% D1
% 8B

[vorobey]

Quote: cniza

Let them do what they want, or rather, as the owner decides - the United States.

This is precisely what rules London, and the USA is a tool in the hands of a shoemaker ...

[SMikhalych]

Quote: cniza

Let them do what they want, or rather, as the owner decides - the United States.

Absolute ignorance of history. The United States was never the host for Great Britain. The historical triumvirate: Great Britain-Vatican-USA, where Great Britain has ALWAYS been the predominant role, the US plays the role of gendarme and the Vatican is engaged in ideology.
But to understand this, you need to make a little mental effort, and sofa marshals are not always able to

[joopel]

In general, they said everything correctly, but the last two lines are very unpleasant. Why are you all so reserved it? Even if you are from GREAT thinkers, you must be smarter, more modest, with all your unrecognized and underestimated genius.

[Persistent]

Crowds of Europeans roam Europe and ask each other the only question:
“Are you coming out next year?”

Not those fans were beaten at the 2016 European Championships! It was necessary to beat the Germans, then Germany would leave the EU, and not Great Britain.

[NIKNN]

Well, if the Queen is to be discredited, then this is an encroachment on the monarchy, what will remain with small Britain? It’s easier than Cameron to sniff, anyway the pawn is lost. But the essence is interesting in the sense of whether the monarchy will win? For tee Britain, this is a matter of honor. We will see.

[Ivan Ivanych]

Well, let's see)

[Skif83]

Well, in fact, the queen is played by the "Belderberg" retinue.
She can only think that she is managing something, however, like most heads of state.
The point, in my opinion, is different.
A typical way out of the "slightly pregnant" situation.
First we hold a referendum, and then when we don’t like the results, we start to excuse ourselves: - maybe London will maintain its status in the EU, or maybe we will repeat the referendum, or maybe carefully listen to a smaller portion of those who voted ... ???
We, in fact, also passed this in the 1990th.
So who rules the world?

[nika407]

It just seems to me that the results of the referendum were not so unpredictable. Something tells me that the next performance is being played on the world stage. At the same time, everyone remains at his own: England gains sovereignty, the EU intimidates and unites all its countries. People see an interesting action: the struggle and the suffering of the Britons to rupture the aorta. But England safely avoids refugees and economic collapse in this case. And Merkel’s faithful dog helps England get out of the EU faster.

[A.Anatol]

Quote: c-Petrov

So not everything is clear.

YES! on the one hand, she needs to be commanded by her subjects
not subject to the queen "fuck who understands"

[spech]

She has the power to even start a war or end it. And parliament can dissolve.

Here is such a funny thing "democracy"

[igorka357]

You said everything correctly, she can do whatever she wants, she is a queen, but ... she hasn’t done it for a very long time and will not do it! It's just like a rarity, like a monument in Britain .. it's like an old great-great-grandfather hat that lies in closet, crumbles from old age .. but it is a pity to throw it out, because this is the memory of the roots!

[sgazeev]

Quote: Wend

Opponents of the exit gathered a petition, opponents of the EU will also collect a petition. So, what is next? Britain has no way out. If after the referendum it does not leave the EU, then Germany will no longer hear the voice of the Saxons. This British can not tolerate.

The representative of France’s famous political surname Le Penov, Marion Le Pen, has sarcastically criticized the vote on a new referendum on Britain’s secession from the European Union. The deputy of the National Assembly posted a scandalous video on her page on the social network, on which she fills out a questionnaire on the website of the Government of the Kingdom.

First, in the column “Are you a British citizen”, the Frenchwoman ticks off without hesitation, and then completely signs with the name of Napoleon Bonaparte. Her voice was counted as a result. Thus, according to Marion Le Pen, anyone can sign the petition, so it “has no value.”

[Revolver]

Quote: Wend

Germany will no longer hear the voice of the Aglosaxians

In fact, it was Germany, or rather Merkel personally, who made the mess. She blurted out without thinking that Germany would accept all those in need of asylum. And when the number of refugees went to hundreds of thousands, and in the future millions were looming, she backed up, but okay like "we no longer accept", but no - "we will accept, but other EU countries are obliged to fairly share the burden." And other countries do not want, especially Britain - they have enough of their own, from the British Commonwealth, packs and Nigerians oh, sorry, it turned out not politically correct, it was necessary to "African Americans", but the essence is still the same - the Arabs did not give the fuck to them. As a Frenchman said about the Germans, "First they exterminated OUR Jews, and now Merkel is trying to impose on us HIS Negroes and Arabs." Well, in Britain, they voted to leave the problem of refugees and all other migrants on the other side of the strait.

[sergey2017]

They will not succeed in canceling the results of the referendum! Now they have Zugzwang (German Zugzwang literally “forced to move”) - a chess position in which any player’s move leads to a deterioration of his position (situation)!

[dmi.pris1]

Look at this little family .. Lord, what senility! And they also have to make some decisions ..

[Strezhevchanin]

Quote: dmi.pris

Look at this little family .. Lord, what senility! And they also have to make some decisions ..

How else? Etozh karma !!!

[sgazeev]

Quote: Ivan Ivanovich

Old chicken will do what they order

The old chicken has oatmeal up to the grave, she doesn’t need noise. Dermocracy is first and foremost. Britain Kanesha is not the mistress of the seas, but will live hanging out like a substance in an ice hole.

[Ivan Ivanych]

Absolutely agree! let it peck)

[Mavrikiy]

Quote: Ivan Ivanovich

Old chicken will do what they order

I would say: she will do what is right.
And it will be correct to withdraw England from the EU.
1. Migrants trample the EU, a competitor to the United States. And England is all in white.
2. The TAPok agreement with the USA and the EU will be on one condition, with England on others.
3. Previously, England looked after the EU, now maybe pro-Poland Poland will advance their interests.
Yes, and much more ...

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Ivan Ivanovich

Old chicken will do what they order

I doubt that she really needs Europe with millions of refugees and an external debt comparable to the US debt of 19 trillion dollars ...
Died so dead)))
They will simply settle down the possible problems associated with the exit and will observe the further development of chaos in Europe from the side, washing down with dark Irish ale.

[Dam]

Oh oh Wasn't she muddied all this?

[Seal]

Why not her? Everything can be !!! To die - so with the music !!! In the end, at least something to do !!!

[Homo]

Quote: Ivan Ivanovich

Old chicken will do what they order

But not a fact. She already thinks more about the spiritual than the worldly. And there, by other standards, they consider merit. Many before leaving for another world surprised with their decisions.

[okunevich_rv]

There is only one road to Carvinus’s relative.

[Blondy]

Well, that’s what I would call names. Could you indicate (with your finger) who can order something to the elderly queen with her authority? Especially if the queen herself is among the Eurosceptics. I quote myself again

Blondy RU Yesterday, 10:46 | The authorities of Germany and France announced the need to reform the European Union
Interesting detail: The Queen of England, apparently. also included in the number of eurosceptics:
Officially, Elizabeth II keeps aloof from political discussions. Buckingham Palace did not comment on the results of the referendum. Nevertheless, British journalists have repeatedly reported that the Queen is one of the Eurosceptics. Another confirmation of this appeared on the eve of the referendum. As the personal biographer of the monarch Robert Lacey said, at a dinner party she turned to the guests with the question: "Give me three good reasons why Britain should remain part of Europe." According to Lacey, Elizabeth II loves such conversations with guests, and this remark “was thrown across the table like a pin-pong ball.” (Https://rg.ru/2016/06/28/korola-elizaveta-ii-poshutila- o-svoem-

health.html)

By the way, and Cameron said that he was not going to hold a second referendum yet another self-cirtation

Although Cameron has already cast out a second Brexit
David Cameron rules out second EU referendum after Brexit
Dismissing a popular petition, Prime Minister's spokesperson says another vote is 'not remotely on the cards' (// www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-what-is-eu-refe
rendum-petition-david-cameron-a7105596.html)

Nevertheless - I am still skeptical that Britain will leave the EU - there are too many troubles, up to the breakaway of Scotland with Seven Ireland, and, in principle, no one is ready for Britain to turn into a nasty England with them .

[Maki Avellevich]

Old chicken will do what they order

the kingdom of England is not the queen of Belgium or Spain there, she has real power.
For example, the Queen of England has the right to start a war with anyone she wants, parliament’s permission is not required.
also she can dissolve this pallment if she wants.

the chicken is old of course, but it looks like she orders there.

[Weyland]

Quote: Ivan Ivanovich

Old chicken

is a member of the Bilderberg Club - unlike Maxim. So who will whom and what will be ordered is still unknown!

[Vladimirets]

"European integration of Ukraine"

A misprint according to Freud, "European integration" is exactly what Ukraine will achieve in the end. Damn, already fixed.

[vorobey]

Quote: Vladimirets

Typo by Freud,

Zheka hi ... according to Freud it would sound like this ... an associate member wants to integrate more deeply into Europe ..

[Vladimirets]

Quote: vorobey

associate member wants to integrate deeper into Europe ..

This mood is lyrical, and here again you, my friend, with your indecencies.
Great, shovel.

[Irokez]

No - "She died so died."

[Titsen]

So Grandma was needed!

[Wiruz]

exercise the right of veto on referendum results

True democracy

[Rokossovsky]

True democracy

Schrodinger democracy, I would say ...

[Mister22408]

Do not confuse the cliches at the bankers ;-)

[HAM]

HAM (2) RU 24 June 2016 15:24
Not yet evening,Yankees will tell HOW to correctly count incorrect results, 2-3 %% this is a statistical error "that they are suspiciously silent for a long time, are they going to ATO or what?

In, it’s come! There were clues. Democracy, it is so, evil.

[Mengad]

The Queen herself is against the EU. But most likely she will be neutral in this matter.

[Vend]

Quote: Mengad

The Queen herself is against the EU. But most likely she will be neutral in this matter.

I think so too. It is enough to recall her reaction after the referendum on Scotland.

[sgazeev]

Quote: Mengad

The Queen herself is against the EU. But most likely she will be neutral in this matter.

She is a consumer patriot, she eats, drinks, reads only British. And German sausages do not crawl into her, just as she was a volunteer during the war.

[AlexTires]

Everything can be - the Queen of Great Britain heads all three branches of power, her powers are limited not by law, but by custom, so a feint must come up with some kind of ...

[ALEA IACTA EST]

And they call Russia totalitarian.

[Holsten]

The veto of results is absurd. You cannot forbid a fact, but you can not give a damn about it.

[Simon]

And what - does it help? What queen will go against the people? Already in the Middle Ages there was one revolution in England, then the royal dynasty was regretted.

[1536]

Somehow, somehow the British have no motions. It’s not necessary to set fire to tires at Buckingham Palace, or to arrange supporters or opponents of a talk show on the BBC, with massacre, jiu-jitsu techniques, etc. In the parliament you have to fight. But it’s not interesting when the Lords do not lord crap, it’s better when the other way around.
In a word, the people are silent! And they said that the British have democracy in the blood, that they will not sacrifice their interests. But in reality, like bugs, they crawled under the blanket, hid under the skirt of the old queen, and asked, give us something to make it good.
The fact that the rest of the world no longer wants to be robbed, plundered and destroyed by the British does not reach them.

[Dmitry Potapov]

Nothing decisive parasite and old nag! As I understand it, she has the right to throw most of her subjects, and that this is “democracy?” This is more like despotism, although I am not surprised at anything in the West, they are ready to apply double standards even at home, morons, damn!

[sgazeev]

Quote: Dmitry Potapov

Nothing decisive parasite and old nag! As I understand it, she has the right to throw most of her subjects, and that this is “democracy?” This is more like despotism, although I am not surprised at anything in the West, they are ready to apply double standards even at home, morons, damn!

[cyberhanter]

Article minus. Majority and minority - 48 vs 52 percent? :) This is not a majority or a minority, it is a split in public opinion. IMHO, such decisions should be made with the vast majority, say 70 vs 30. So the veto is just logical

[kotvov]

taken overwhelmingly, say 70 vs 30,
so what's the question, drop a letter to the League of Sex Minorities, I think you will be supported there.

[cyberhanter]

but what does it have to do with it? :) THERE if a referendum in the Russian Federation were now held for dividing into several parts and 51 percent would vote for, would you agree? I think that such decisions cannot be taken only by a simple majority.

[A-Sim]

"Here's your wet - start over ..."

[beer-youk]

Quote: Holsten

You cannot forbid a fact, but you can not give a damn about it.

Sorry for the repeat. "Civilized" Western "democracy" recognizes the results of only those referendums that were not held (Kosovo), and openly spits on the results of those held (USSR, Crimea, Greece, the Netherlands). I see no reason for anything to change!

[Orionvit]

There is a lot of debate, but as they say, we will see. The fact is that we all do not own the quantity and quality of information in order to predict the further development of events. However, the trends are very interesting. Let's hope this is the beginning of the end of the Western world.

[Amurets]

Quote: Orionvit

There is a lot of debate, but as they say, we will see. The fact is that we all do not own the quantity and quality of information in order to predict the further development of events. However, the trends are very interesting. Let's hope this is the beginning of the end of the Western world.

I agree in many ways, but not in everything. If the Western world ends, the Eastern ends too. Because no peaceful outcome is expected here. To predict anything in this situation is ungrateful.

[Banishing liberoids]

And the queen is listening and eating!

[Anchonsha]

And yet the queen can do anything, but it will not be royal to go against the majority. Although in the West it is possible that all and any actions will be justified, including spitting on the will of the majority, but then the queen will end like something meaningful in England. What are we going to look at all this tram-taram in a smelly geyropa.

[Siberia 9444]

I think she herself does not mind that England would leave the EU. Soon, the elections in France and the cockerel Hollande will fly him all the French will remember, and then Grandma Merkel will sit in the puddle booty.

[RuslanNN]

The veto on the results of the referendum is to officially put the BOLT on the opinion of the majority of the population. Democracy, however.

[samarin1969]

Yeah! Though parliamentary - but MONARCHY!

[Kibl]

So like the queen-grandmother herself was not against jumping off a trolley called the EU.

[dchegrinec]

And she didn’t jump off her, she left on her

[cherkas.oe]

She will not impose any veto. Because this whole referendum was prepared so quickly and at lightning speed to cover up another financial scam that fat financial cats are preparing to carry out on both sides of the puddle, and this scam will break out not late September - October, just before the elections in n = i-nd -os ai. And the responsibility for the next financial crisis will be put on a referendum and "Brexit". And the old woman is not just aware, she is in the share of the upcoming derban. And what is the point of her disrupting the cover operation?

[dchegrinec]

they don’t know which stick to insert into which wheel, damn Democrats.

[Olezhek]

In vain they are like this: the queen - she’s on her mind ...
And FIG knows him - on whose side is she.
Although it is so British: in a difficult moment to appeal to Her Majesty ...

[HAM]

Quote: Expelling Liberoids

And the queen is listening and eating!

Yes, she only needs: kefir, klystir and a warm toilet ...... Do not torment the grandmother!

[behemot]

democracy ah. The lies of false creatures.

[Makarov]

It will not be a bell ... as they worked against their enemies in the name of domination in the whole world, and will continue to do so ... this is bullshit Bexit. With or without the EU, Britain is as much a mediator of the will of the overseas master as the EU ... this is the usual division of powers between its vassals and the "will of the people" like the "queen" is the tenth thing ...

[max15243]

The situation with the UK referendum is not so simple. Before that, there was a referendum in Scotland, as a result of which Cameron got off with a slight fright. Now he needed a referendum to influence Brussels, so that he would carry out a series of reforms in the EU in the interests of the United States. The refugee crisis has shown that the EU is not ready for a prompt and effective solution to emerging problems. In Europe, there is no clarity of positions on the solution of common European problems. They are trying to consolidate the EU, to make a clear system of European subordination. Now the EU is a ship with 28 captains who are collectively trying to manage, but they are not yet ready for one-man management (the supremacy of one European "captain") because of national interests. The clumsy bureaucratic machine of the EU was beneficial to the United States as long as there were long-term tasks, now there is a political exacerbation of the situation in the world and delaying a decision is worse than making a timely "wrong" decision.

[avg-mgn]

England has two months to decide. What it will be, we can only guess now. There are three options, wash my eyes:
1. It turns out that the EU is shaken for a long time and dies.
2. It doesn’t come out, the EU is reformatted and becomes less politicized.
3. The EU surrenders under the pressure of the situation and England dictates its terms to Brussels.

In either of these scenarios, England wins by securing concessions from the EU or raises its rating in Europe.

But what we win or lose is another question. The main thing is how to get the most out of this situation ?!

[Banderas]

First Brexit, then Frexit ...

[SMikhalych]

In Britain, after the announcement of the results of the referendum, the forces that want the United Kingdom to not leave the EU have clearly intensified.

And at that time ... President of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko sent invitations to EU leaders to visit Belovezhskaya Pushcha, look around ...

[Olegater]

And for all these bastards nothing. What they want is what they do. They wanted to give the word - it went something wrong or took the word. And what are they embarrassed about? it is to local aborigines but not to them so great . All that they stir up all sorts of referenda is a complete pit with brown substance and stinks from this island, both literally and figuratively. But the conclusion is that if a country wants to be strong, it is necessary to do what is needed for this country and people, and not to pay attention to all the cryo-defenders and politicians bought over the hill and ignore any screams in another case (threaten something economically, politically and militaryly).

[masiya]

How interesting is that, skazamshi - "A" should be said "B" .. after all, the people cannot understand, sho and where and what the authorities want ... this English-language MOV especially infuriates ..., in general, kaklov's brains are crawling. .. about scho .. and how to live after that?

[Art777]

What a good example of "democracy" ..- the minority demands auto-territorialism! :))

[Arkan]

In the photo, Baba Lisa and the Prince Consort, especially he, like from a horror movie, "the undead revived." Let's see what the English grandmother has to say.

[Nehist]

Britain has always treated the EU with irony and constantly emphasized its special status by putting sticks in the wheels of this very European Union. It is the EU that has always cried that Britain is against one decision or another. So the EU itself is joyfully waiting for Britain to quit and stop torpedoing the laws and regulations common to the entire EU with its special status, creating precedents to which these or other EU members then refer.

[Amurets]

Quote: Nehist

So the EU itself is joyfully waiting for Britain to quit and stop torpedoing the laws and regulations common to the entire EU with its special status, creating precedents to which these or other EU members then refer.

That's right! England cannot help but forget that, a hundred years ago, it was a great empire, over which the sun did not set. And I was surprised to learn that the British Commonwealth still exists and is formally led by the Queen of England.
http://fb.ru/article/166150/sodrujestvo-natsiy-spisok-stran
And now, using its institutions around the world, England is putting sticks in those EU decisions that are not beneficial to England.

[Zomanus]

I got the feeling that the British voted to leave the EU purely for fun.
And only after the results became known, they began to understand what they were facing in the future.
It goes without saying that some then decided to re-vote.
It is very reminiscent of the collapse of the Union. In the beginning, too, everything was "for fun."
The dudes gathered in a forest, signed something ...
How long did it take to realize that "unprintable"
into which all this has poured?

[Bulrumeb]

Mark Rutte said that official Amsterdam will ignore the results of the Dutch referendum, during which most of the Dutch said no to Ukraine’s European integration.

No, take it away !!!