The American destroyer Gravely has dangerously approached the Russian watchdog Yaroslav the Wise in the Mediterranean

Frants Klintsevich, First Deputy Head of the Committee of the Federation Council on Defense and Security, commented on information about the approach of the American destroyer Gravely close to the Russian Yaroslav the Wise patrol. According to the Russian senator, this is an American provocation. Interfax cites Klintsevich's statement:

This is a provocation, this is a blatant case - the convergence of such ships at a distance of 180 meters threatens with a possible sharp accident, because anything can happen there.

It should be noted that Press Service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation spread the message that on June 17 in the Mediterranean, the US Navy destroyer approached the Russian patrol ship at close range. In this case, we are talking about 60-70 m.

From the statement of the official representative of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation:

On June 17, in the eastern part of the Mediterranean, the American destroyer Gravely made a dangerous rapprochement with the Russian warship to the 60-70 meters on the left side and crossed the route of the Yaroslav the Wise patrol ship on the dangerous 180 meters. At the same time, the Russian warship followed a constant course and speed in international waters and did not carry out any dangerous maneuvering with respect to the American ship.

The Russian defense ministry said that lately the Pentagon constantly accuses Russian military pilots and sailors of incompetence, but it does not say anything when American seamen violate safety standards at sea.

Press service of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation:

This incident, involving the dangerous maneuvering of the “Gravely” destroyer, shows that American naval sailors allow themselves to forget about the basic principles of safe navigation and not think at all about the consequences of dangerous maneuvering in areas of intensive navigation. The commander and crew of the destroyer "Gravely" grossly violated the international rules for preventing collisions of ships (MCPSS-71). The American sailors ignored the 13 rule (“Overtaking”), which requires each vessel to overtake to steer away from the course of the vessel being overtaken, and the 15 rule (“Course crossing situation”).

The Russian patrol ship "Yaroslav the Wise" enters the Mediterranean squadron of the Russian Navy on a rotating basis. Naval affiliation - the Baltic Fleet of the Russian Federation.

Comments

[Dr. Stein]

They will get more!

[The black]

Lost, maybe.? Would you like to ask for a road?

[Reserve officer]

Dangerous driving. Take the rights from the captain of the American destroyer. You can pay the fine at any branch of Sberbank.

[Mercenary]

"Take away rights" and evacuate the vehicle to a fine parking!

[cniza]

Everything is returning, as in the times of the confrontation between the USSR and the USA, but Russia is now different and there is no need to provoke us.

[sherp2015]

Quote: cniza

Everything is returning, as in the times of the confrontation between the USSR and the USA, but Russia is now different and there is no need to provoke us.

decided to check with whom I ... are stronger?

[OlegLex]

Everything is returning, as in the times of the confrontation between the USSR and the USA, but Russia is now different and there is no need to provoke us.

Well, yes, we are now much weaker than in the days of the USSR, but we have become angrier as well, have thrown the blinkers from our eyes.

[Mahmut]

Well, they cheered again. In the navy, in contrast to highways, the rule is "interference from the left". Initially, the American's course was perpendicular to ours. "Goes across the path" - a sailor's voice-over. The American walked on the left side, which means that our ship should have let him through, but did not do this, violating the rules of maritime navigation. In order to avoid a collision, the destroyer turned to the left and was directly in the course of our ship.

[larand]

Quote: Mahmut

Well, they huffed again. The American was on the left side, which means our ship should have missed it, but did not violate the rule of maritime shipping. To avoid a collision, the destroyer turned to the left and ended up right at the heading of our ship.

When two ships with mechanical engines approach each other on opposite or almost opposite courses so that there is a danger of a collision, each of them should change its course to the right so that each ship passes the other on the port side.
When they go at intersecting courses so that there is a danger of a collision, a vessel that has another on its right side should give way to another vessel and, if circumstances permit, it must avoid crossing the course of another vessel along its bow.
Learn the materiel before lecturing.

[OlegLex]

Well, about the nuance, that these are two warships, and that ram is still considered a means of attack.

[denis02135]

Dear larand

And you do not know why you removed the Commander of the Baltic Fleet and the chief of staff? After US accusations or for another reason? Somehow it converges in time.

[lukewarm]

It was written for overstatement and unsatisfactory performance. Easier for fraud. Beautifully reported and crap one's pants.

[kayman4]

It's nice to see such a sign of navigation :) But I don't know where the rules of the "left" interference come from :) Out of what fantasies. An old naval rule - "take care of the starboard side" (because the captain's cabin is there :))

So the American cut the course of the guard from the port side, which means that the starboard side was covered — the Russians didn’t violate anything here — but while waiting for the Americans, our guard was right across the board - so - “... a vessel that has another on its right side must give way to another vessel and, if circumstances permit, it must avoid crossing the course of another vessel along its bow” (MPPSS, Rule 15). It should also “... take early and decisive action in order to disperse cleanly with another ship” (IWSS, Rule 16).

Thickly troll

[roadsmell]

Finish the star))) ...
Ukrainians are already yelling:

Russian ship made dangerous operations near US Navy ships
RIA Novosti Ukraine: http://rian.com.ua/world_news/20160628/1012349624.html

... Again they are not to blame, but we ourselves came

[Ramzaj99]

Quote: roadsmell

Finish the star))) ...
Ukrainians are already yelling:
Russian ship made dangerous operations near US Navy ships

Yes, no longer Ukrainians, already the Pentagon.
This is 100500 lvl of cynicism ((((

[Mahmut]

The rule you are talking about was valid in the equestrian formations of the Basmachi, but not in the navy. Currently, even ships navigating the vast steppes of Kazakhstan do not use this rule.

The rules of navigation are the same for everyone. "Skip the left", but if it is very hot - we will vote as it should, and we will drag in any heresy as arguments.

[larand]

Quote: Mahmut

[i] The rule you are talking about was valid in the equestrian formations of the Basmachi, but not in the fleet. At present, even ships plowing the expanses of the steppes of Kazakhstan do not use this rule ..

Of the Basmachi or something, an expert?

[kayman4]

Rather, you have one concept in navigation - "He who is not Russian is always right :)" _

find the link to your clutter on the left :)

[unsinkable]

Quote: Mahmut

the rule applies

The rule you are talking about was valid in the equestrian formations of the Basmachi, but not in the navy. Currently, even ships navigating the vast steppes of Kazakhstan do not use this rule.

[okroshka79]

Decided to troll? Oh well.

[kepmor]

Mahmoud, this is in the desert on camels "interference from the left", and in the sea COLREG-72 rule 15 is in effect - "a ship with a mechanical engine MUST give way to an obstacle on the RIGHT" !!!!
Don’t confuse donkey with ship ...
Actually, I don't understand what this "fuss" was raised by our journalists!
At all times, our fleet butted with NATO at sea - and stronger than the one who is bolder!
Himself on his ship more than once "expelled" both the British and the Norwegians from the areas of closure, while absolutely "did not care about the rules of the COLREGs, the main thing here is who has a" point more iron "!
They even tried to deprive me of my admission to control the ship in 89, for dangerous maneuvering during a "joint waltz" on the border of the missile firing area with the old "Maryatta" (a reconnaissance ship of the Norwegian Navy) ... but limited to the "strokach" from Kom Fleet.
Americans at sea behave very brazenly. They should not be given slack - they will only sit on their necks!
And our commander had to immediately raise the signal on the MSS - "I am starting the maneuver to the left," and not continue to follow the same course!
At sea, as "in the yard" - the stronger is the one who is bolder .... there is nothing for our "snot to chew" !!!

[Berkut-UA]

As Secretary of State Kerry said, "If the Russians fly so close to our ships again, we have the right to shoot them down."
Well, in this case,
following THIS american logic
The Russian ship had every right to drown the Americans.

[kepmor]

And you on the road, too, immediately from the "shotgun" smack at everyone who "cut" you?
It is also surprising that the "sofa naval commanders" in this situation, which is not worth a "hatched egg", about the "calibers" are silent for some reason !?
Apparently this "political worker" Klintsevich so wants to get into a new thought, since he is inflating "out of a fly elephant" ... the homeland is in danger!
The closer the elections, the more "urapatriotic insanity" will be from the servants of the people!

[a housewife]

Skip? What is it like? Slow down?

[max73]

weaker, not the USSR, I agree. but, did not turn away "Wise" and did not change the course

[NEXUS]

Quote: max73

weaker, not the USSR, I agree. but, did not turn away "Wise" and did not change the course

I wonder if, instead of our guard, Peter the Great would be enough for the spirit of the mattresses to make a decision on rapprochement? Something very doubtful. Petka would definitely not have turned.

[the most important]

Quote: NEXUS

I wonder if, instead of our guard, Peter the Great would be enough for the spirit of the mattresses to make a decision on rapprochement? Something very doubtful. Petka would definitely not have turned.

We need 15 such beauties ... then nobody will cross the road!

[dkflbvbh]

cniza RU June 28, 2016 17:24 ↑
Everything is returning, as in the times of the confrontation between the USSR and the USA, but Russia is now different and there is no need to provoke us.

This USSR did not have to provoke ... And not this Russia ...

[Persistent]

"Take away the rights" and evacuate the vehicle to a fine parking lot!

Tie a knot on the barrel of the gun mount

[IgorV]

A captain for 15 days.

[mad]

Quote: Mercenary

evacuate the vehicle to a fine parking!

at the bottom of the Mediterranean)))

[Simon]

The next time it happens, to the parking lot, put to the bottom, rights are not needed there!

[NIKNN]

C'mon guys. Especially nothing happened.
I think in response to the claim, the states will answer: "... The Russian ship is dangerously close (180 m from the rear) the course of our destroyer, which is an unacceptable violation of ALL international ... etc." That's when we'll laugh

[Persistent]

C'mon guys. Especially nothing happened.
I think in response to the claim, the states will answer: "... The Russian ship is dangerously close (180 m from the rear) the course of our destroyer, which is an unacceptable violation of ALL international ... etc." That's when we'll laugh

Insolent ... Let them come to the Crimea to get a "bulk" for the acuteness ...

[Kostyar]

When the crowd of Americans, like in the Mediterranean, they are, oh, oh very cool .....

[Joe stalin]

No, just navigator Gravely ordered "sushi oars" and at that moment the destroyer poured a gust of wind on our patrol boat.

[sherp2015]

Quote: Black

Lost, maybe.? Would you like to ask for a road?

It is necessary to turn to the experience of Soviet times. They didn’t get there for a long time with the violator (NAVAL)

[Persistent]

It is necessary to turn to the experience of Soviet times. They didn’t get there for a long time with the violator (NAVAL)

Alas !! "Naval" is possible only in our territorial waters ...

[lukewarm]

Yeah. Only there were OUR territorial waters. And with all this, our captain washed in Moscow for a long time - the times were already Gorbachev's and the course was taken to surrender everything and everyone. It is clear that such actions of the military "leader" were annoying.

[razmik72]

A similar situation occurred with another Russian patrol ship in the Aegean Sea on December 13, 2015, when the Smetlivy patrol ship opened warning fire on a Turkish fishing seiner approaching it. This time the captain's nerves were stronger.

[goblin xnumx]

yeah, compared- fire on the fisherman and fire on the destroyer :) - what nerves? - think what to write :)

[razmik72]

Quote: Leshy74

yeah, compared- fire on the fisherman and fire on the destroyer :) - what nerves? - think what to write :)

The captain of "Sharp-witted" either obviously lost his nerves when he opened fire on the Turkish fishing seiner, or he did it in order, so to speak, to put pressure on the Turkish side. "he could also open warning fire, a large number of members of the forum support such a decision, but only the captain of the" American "could turn out to be a" gambling "man and in response he could also "shoot". "American" is clearly not a "fisherman", he had something to answer.

[Vladimirets]

Quote: razmik72

The captain of the "Sharp-witted" either obviously lost his nerves when he opened fire on the Turkish fishing seiner, or he did it in order, so to speak, to put pressure on the Turkish side. "He could also open warning fire, a large number of members of the forum support such a decision, but only the captain of the" American "could turn out to be a" gambling "man and in response could also" shoot ". "American" is clearly not a "fisherman", he had something to answer.

The fishing seiner could in reality be anyone, including the Igilovsky firewall. In the case of the destroyers, everything is clear and here the rules of the game are different.

[razmik72]

Quote: Vladimirets

Quote: razmik72

The captain of the "Sharp-witted" either obviously lost his nerves when he opened fire on the Turkish fishing seiner, or he did it in order, so to speak, to put pressure on the Turkish side. "He could also open warning fire, a large number of members of the forum support such a decision, but only the captain of the" American "could turn out to be a" gambling "man and in response could also" shoot ". "American" is clearly not a "fisherman", he had something to answer.

The fishing seiner could in reality be anyone, including the Igilovsky firewall. In the case of the destroyers, everything is clear and here the rules of the game are different.

The Igilovsky Brander is something new in military affairs. Any stupidity can be justified, for that matter.

[Vladimirets]

Quote: razmik72

The Igilovsky Brander is something new in military affairs. Any stupidity can be justified, for that matter.

The planes in the twin towers were brand new, but there was nothing new in the firewalls, the ancients still drowned the ships of the enemies with the help of arsoners (and now fuses). And with ships from a fairly new one, if you yourself haven’t heard anything:
"In the fall of 2000, the destroyer Cole, part of the Fifth Fleet of the US Navy, was carrying out tasks to monitor compliance with the international embargo against Iraq. On October 12, 2000, at 9:30 am (local time), the destroyer Cole moored in the port of Aden for The ship began refueling at 10 am During the next hour, about 30 gallons of JP-100 fuel (000 gpm) entered the ship's fuel tanks. 5 UTC), while the crew of the ship was having breakfast in the dining room, the destroyer Cole was attacked by a fiberglass motor boat operated by two suicide bombers (according to some sources - Arab origin) and stuffed, according to experts, 2000-11 or even 18 kilograms of explosives in TNT equivalent.
As a result of a blast in the middle part of the hull (from the port side) at the waterline level, a hole of 6 × 12 m was formed (according to other sources - 12 × 12 or even 12 × 18 m), crew cubicles and cabins were flooded. Gas turbine engines, a propeller shaft were disabled, and the dining room on the upper deck was damaged. From the explosion, "Cole" tilted four degrees to the port side. The consequence of the explosion was a fire, and the crew of the ship until the evening fought for its survivability.
The explosion killed 17 people, including 2 female members of the Cole team, another 39 people were injured of varying severity. "

And it was a boat in the port, but what if the whole seiner was in the sea?

[razmik72]

Quote: Vladimirets

Quote: razmik72

The Igilovsky Brander is something new in military affairs. Any stupidity can be justified, for that matter.

The planes in the twin towers were brand new, but there was nothing new in the firewalls, the ancients still drowned the ships of the enemies with the help of arsoners (and now fuses). And with ships from a fairly new one, if you yourself haven’t heard anything:
"In the fall of 2000, the destroyer Cole, part of the Fifth Fleet of the US Navy, was carrying out tasks to monitor compliance with the international embargo against Iraq. On October 12, 2000, at 9:30 am (local time), the destroyer Cole moored in the port of Aden for The ship began refueling at 10 am During the next hour, about 30 gallons of JP-100 fuel (000 gpm) entered the ship's fuel tanks. 5 UTC), while the crew of the ship was having breakfast in the dining room, the destroyer Cole was attacked by a fiberglass motor boat operated by two suicide bombers (according to some sources - Arab origin) and stuffed, according to experts, 2000-11 or even 18 kilograms of explosives in TNT equivalent.
As a result of a blast in the middle part of the hull (from the port side) at the waterline level, a hole of 6 × 12 m was formed (according to other sources - 12 × 12 or even 12 × 18 m), crew cubicles and cabins were flooded. Gas turbine engines, a propeller shaft were disabled, and the dining room on the upper deck was damaged. From the explosion, "Cole" tilted four degrees to the port side. The consequence of the explosion was a fire, and the crew of the ship until the evening fought for its survivability.
The explosion killed 17 people, including 2 female members of the Cole team, another 39 people were injured of varying severity. "

And it was a boat in the port, but what if the whole seiner was in the sea?

You shouldn't have made such an excursion into history and write such a long text, but he is well aware of the fire-ships and the ways of their use. My sarcasm is connected with the fact that ISIS still has no fleet, not a single ship, and the incident with the Russian patrol ship "Smetlivy" occurred in the Aegean Sea, between the coasts of Turkey and Greece, and not off the coast of Syria. For your information, there are hundreds of kilometers from the Aegean Sea to Syria.

[Weyland]

Quote: razmik72

My sarcasm is due to the fact that so far ISIS has no fleet, not a single ship

So in 2000m everyone thought that al-Qaeda did not have a fleet! So what, is a firewall a fleet or something?

[AllXVahhaB]

Quote: razmik72

The Igilovsky Brander is something new in military affairs.

And what's new ???

[AllXVahhaB]

Quote: razmik72

Any stupidity can be justified, for that matter.

Any stupid message can be refuted, for that matter:

[uruss]

if the destroyer then immediately ramp!

[My doctor]

-

Quote: razmik72

A similar situation occurred with another Russian patrol ship in the Aegean Sea on December 13, 2015, when the Smetlivy patrol ship opened warning fire on a Turkish fishing seiner approaching it.

compared the Turkish fishing seiner and the American destroyer. In front of the guard, the art installation is steeper and the displacement is greater without taking into account the missiles, and the seiner is only a network.

[AllXVahhaB]

Quote: MyVrach

compared the Turkish fishing seiner and the American destroyer. In front of the guard, the art installation is steeper and the displacement is greater without taking into account the missiles, and the seiner is only a network.

For example, how is it?

[igor.borov775]

Hello!!. Excuse me, but here is the stlrzhevik. He was parked in the city. Yayaya Each case is separate and the situations are always different. With Respect

[11 black]

Quote: MyVrach

compared the Turkish fishing seiner and the American destroyer. In front of the guard, the art installation is steeper and the displacement is greater without taking into account the missiles, and the seiner is only a network.

What does art mean. installation "cooler" - how much and what exactly may I ask?
Yes, and our RBU stands on the nose - if you shoot point-blank it is just a terrible thing.

[SMikhalych]

Quote: Black

Lost, maybe.? Would you like to ask for a road?

- Russians, didn’t our swim here?
- Yes, gone south-west-west ...
- What the hell is South-West-West, I’ll come closer now and show me the direction with your hand

[RussianRoulette]

Tests of the latest development of the Russian Federation, the Invisible M ship camouflage system, were successful! The Gravely's crew and command learned of the dangerous rapprochement with the Yaroslav the Wise from the news.

[oleg-gr]

Greyhound Americans. So it itches a lot from the campaign company. Obama and Clintonsha really need a victory over Russia and GDP. Although local.

[ava09]

Quote: oleg-gr

Greyhound Americans. So it itches a lot from the campaign company. Obama and Clintonsha really need a victory over Russia and GDP. Although local.

They will continue this process until some stop reasoning like that ... Are you familiar with these individuals (s) Obama and Clintonsha (s)? Remember, young man, our main ENEMY is our own STUPIDITY ... And the Navy lives its own life, for it it is a "working" situation ...

[Simon]

The Americans must have forgotten the Black Sea when the patrol guard drove off two of their warships by ramming!

[ava09]

If you are operating with facts, a big request - do not distort them, please.

[Vend]

Quote: Dr. Stein

They will get more!

What did the mattresses say about the dangerous maneuvers of our aircraft? It is visible to them a few who quit Donald Cook.

[Vladimirets]

Quote: Dr. Stein

They will get more!

"This is a provocation, this is an egregious case - the convergence of such ships at a distance of 180 meters threatens a possible abrupt accident, because anything can happen there."

If we ourselves are flying next to them, then we also need, respectively, to squeeze a point into a fist and work on, rather than start yelling at the whole world. After all, we are also checked for lice.

[SRC P-15]

The American destroyer Gravely has dangerously approached the Russian watchdog Yaroslav the Wise in the Mediterranean

Tried to hold on? Our watchdogs are not one of these!

[ava09]

Well, I was glad! At least one SANE-THOUGHTING, besides understanding ... "Climbed into Fight-Fight" ...

[Ajent cho]

Quote: Vladimirets

work further, and not start yelling to the whole world

Those. You don't see the difference at all? In our cases, we simply did not allow them to get too close to the border and our (military!) Bases - provocations were, again, from the Nundos. In this case, the captain of the destroyer stupidly, childishly, wanted to "win back".

[siberalt]

Hooliganism at sea does not bring to good. It seems that the leadership of the US Navy is headed either by the infants or by the provocateurs.

[gg.na]

Quote: siberalt

either infants or provocateurs.

Or both of them in one bottle!

[siberalt]

I very much agree! There is a simple Russian word with the letter "D", but without a link with our Ivanushka, it is prohibited on the site. A kind of one-sided European-style tolerance for Russians
If the second meaning of language is people, then they are afraid of us, however.

[Wiruz]

Well, gentlemen, uri-patriots ?! What say now?

So how can our dryers fly over their Donald Cooks, is this normal? Like, "they themselves are to blame, and in general, the army and navy foreva"

And as they write out a pretzel in front of our ship, so immediately "they are wrong, so-so ... where are the norms of the law of the sea", etc.

As we are to people, so are they to us, alas

PySy: let's set a record - 100 cons! I haven’t had so much

[Temples]

Why are you wrong?

Did someone write a dismissal report upon arrival at the port?

You sir panic more)

[Wiruz]

You sir panic more)

No one is panicking. More precisely, I definitely do not, for the rest I do not know.

It's just that everyone here is so happy when the Su-24, according to tradition, imitates an attack on American destroyers, either in the Black Sea or the Baltic. All this happens in neutral waters, albeit near Russia. And after all, few people understand that American ships, in this case, have every right to shoot down our aircraft.

And now here is a similar situation, although it is not an imitation of an attack on our ship. Read the comments: everyone around is unhappy with the action of the American destroyer. How does is called? An hour not "double standards ?!

[oblako]

They are glad that Russia can already answer the boor, and not just wipe the snot ... Note, at its borders, not at the American ones. And the standard will be when we simulate an attack in the Gulf of Mexico. Then it will be 1: 1 and the score is equal. That's when they say in football "we will snatch a point from the enemy!"))) And after all, "few people know" (I. Prokopenko) that the one who had the right to shoot down our planes was not able to do it 12 times in a row ... Just a probable enemy except permissiveness should also experience some other feelings, the obligation of the Russian military to teach it to do this even before the war, before the actual conflict, so that there would be no surprises later, and at best, that it would not even come to the conflict. Unfortunately, the bandits do not understand another language.

[Vladimirets]

Quote: Wiruz

As we are to people, so are they to us, alas

The point is not that as we are to them, so they are to us. And the fact that the military, both those and others, are men, hussars and daring have always been. And if we are already making fun of the whining of American scout crews, then we shouldn't wail about the Burke in a cable from the Wise. And I don’t think that someone in the TFR team has turned gray. So, the commander reported on command, and already the Ministry of Defense started its own song.

[Dimon19661]

The usual practice is accepted always and everywhere. We remember in a similar way at one time drove the Japanese away from the shooting area. By the way, the Americans didn’t cross the course dangerously (90 degrees were not), so this could not be called a provocation. But they could show the end ((offer to take in tow) is a kind of marine humor. Do not inflate an elephant from a fly.

[Ivan Ivanych]

I guessed you weren’t alone here

[Wiruz]

I guessed you weren’t alone here

I didn’t mix cognac with cola at the same table with you, so I’ll ask you not to "poke".
And about the fact that I'm not the only one here ... So this, sober, sound, fair-thinking people may be few, but they are

[Ivan Ivanych]

I don’t know personally. Judging by the statements. But sir, I wouldn’t drink cognac on one hectare

[Wiruz]

I don’t know personally. Judging by the statements. But sir, I wouldn’t drink cognac on one hectare

I will not exchange mutual insults with you My vanity will not forgive me

[EvgNik]

Quote: Ivan Ivanovich

This is why this site sometimes surprises me that doves like you are gaining 300000 "plus signs"

Ivan Ivanovich, please specify who you are addressing. And a remark - it is customary to refer to "you" on the site only to acquaintances, and then their consent.

[Ivan Ivanych]

Yes, you, Mr. Marshal, look at the text. he lit up))

[EvgNik]

Quote: Ivan Ivanovich

Yes, you, Mr. Marshal, look at the text. he lit up

What does not allow to be rude. There are rules and they must be observed. We all started with the rank and file. Perhaps you will once become a marshal.

[a housewife]

On "you" you can still go to boors and trolls. The rest do not deserve this.

[cap]

Quote: Wiruz

Well, gentlemen, uri-patriots ?! What say now?

So how can our dryers fly over their Donald Cooks, is this normal? Like, "they themselves are to blame, and in general, the army and navy foreva"

And as they write out a pretzel in front of our ship, so immediately "they are wrong, so-so ... where are the norms of the law of the sea", etc.

As we are to people, so are they to us, alas

PySy: let's set a record - 100 cons! I haven’t had so much

Not serious. Let us recall physics. 180 meters for the ship, very little. Inertia. Yes and no handbrake on the ship.
Both in neutral waters.
They will meet on the shore "talk".
In general, pure provocation.
Without the knowledge of the fleet admiral or squadron commander, they are removed from office for such a maneuver, this is for starters.

[Vladimirets]

Quote: cap

Let us recall physics. 180 meters for the ship, very little. Inertia. Yes, and there is no handbrake on the ship.

Better math, class, so, for 4th. The speed of an American is higher, he crosses our course at a very sharp angle. In such layouts of cables, this is quite a lot.

Quote: cap

In general, pure provocation.

This is simple rudeness, such as leaving the "dust to swallow" on the road.

[An64]

Quote: cap

180 meters for the ship, very few

Is 30 meters high for an airplane normal?
Mutual provocations are underway - we have flown over their heads, they have become ahead of us ...
What is the difference? What burst into tears?

[Verdun]

Quote: An64

Mutual provocations are underway - we have flown over their heads, they have become ahead of us ...
What is the difference? What burst into tears?

I watched the video of the event discussed posted on the network. It does not pull on a dangerous rapprochement. can only be regarded as a violation of the rules of navigation. I do not know how the military behave in such cases. Civil shipowners file a lawsuit against the perpetrator. Distorted by the phrase that

rapprochement of such ships at a distance of 180 meters threatens with a possible sharp accident, because anything can happen there.

Anything is what? Nervous breakdown in any of the crew members? So after all, the crew of a warship is not an institution of noble maidens. Tea, Russian sailors - not American - to smear snot on the cheeks for every occasion!

[33 Watcher]

Quote: Wiruz

Well, gentlemen, uri-patriots ?! What say now?

So how can our dryers fly over their Donald Cooks, is this normal? Like, "they themselves are to blame, and in general, the army and navy foreva"

And as they write out a pretzel in front of our ship, so immediately "they are wrong, so-so ... where are the norms of the law of the sea", etc.

As we are to people, so are they to us, alas

PySy: let's set a record - 100 cons! I haven’t had so much

A rather stupid comment ... What are the cons? For stupidity?
As I understand it, it’s useless to urge to study geography ..?

[Wiruz]

As I understand it, it’s useless to urge to study geography ..?

Absolutely useless! And so the solid four was

[grandfather]

+ correctly wrote everything to you. so we also need to emphasize in the media, saying that this is what the exceptional people are doing, and we are just near our borders and intercepting water.
however the service.

[vorobey]

Quote: Wiruz

PySy: let's set a record - 100 cons! I haven’t had so much

so here you are how elusive JOE ...

[Ajent cho]

Quote: Wiruz

PySy: let's set a record - 100 cons! I haven’t had so much

Don’t you say so on minuses and pluses - did not play enough in your childhood?
And with regards to Donald Cook and others, it’s so safe to rattle weapons near our borders. Do you feel the difference?

[Lelek]

Quote: Wiruz

let's set a record - 100 cons!

But you are right. Take away your property and FELL.

[dmi.pris1]

Already received, only forgotten .. In 1988 ..

[sgazeev]

Quote: Dr. Stein

They will get more!

[Gradus HuK]

What characteristically insolent!

[joopel]

A couple of blacks fanned out. What did you want to show? Is his iron healthier? Or dope more? Most likely either stoned, or gorged in the trash.

[Lelek]

Quote: joopel

What did you want to show?

Most likely, they wanted to show in response to the Black Sea and Baltic embarrassment that they were not done with a finger, but it turned out the other way around. Our crew had to include the song "Don't play the fool, America ..." according to the GGS.

[4ekist]

If such a maneuver took place off the coast of Florida, one could understand. And if in the endless expanses of neutral waters, then this is a fool of "sea punks".

[EvgNik]

Well, following the beaten path of the states - expressing concern - is somehow not solid.

[Verdun]

Quote: EvgNik

Well, following the beaten path of the states - expressing concern - is somehow not solid.

Well, expressing concern is a normal world practice, so to speak, a necessary formality. Another thing is that during the Cold War there were cases when the ships of the sides were literally shoved by the sides. In addition, it is not clear from the text of the article whether such an approach of the American ship could damage Yaroslav the Wise. After all, the water area is an elastic concept. Offshore and at great depths - no problem. On a narrow and shallow fairway - a real security threat.

[Forever so]

So here you are what AMERICAN VENGEA !!!))) They would have made a half-barrel under our guard. Imagine WHAT they are there Proud !!! Good guys in diapers))

[Mavrikiy]

Quote: Forever so

So here you are what AMERICAN VENGEA !!!))) They would have made a half-barrel under our guard. Imagine WHAT they are there Proud !!! Good guys in diapers))

Well, the displacement is 2 times more. All so modern, powerful, controlled with two fingers. And if the bulk happened, then the repair in hundreds of lyamas stands. Earhooks.
Well done against the sheep, against the done, the sheep himself.

[strannik595]

Well done against the sheep, against the done, the sheep himself.

Are you sure that the crew of Yaroslav the Wise are sheep? I'm not ...... just someone wants to wait for a boarding + Russian salty fist in turnips)

[Berkut24]

It was necessary to continue rapprochement, as it was on the Black Sea in the last century. Then the Americans had enough for a long time. They still remember.

[Red_Hamer]

Yes, there were times, they didn’t really tweak with them, they just sent them to their "destination", the commander's will was enough! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C1OQb4xH3gU But then they went crazy, they entered our territorial waters! So ours showed that very "mother"!

[Aleksey_K]

Quote: Red_Hamer

Yes, there were times, they didn’t really tweak with them, they just sent them to their "destination", the commander's will was enough!

What does the commander's will have to do with it? The decision to make the "bulk" was made at the highest level in the USSR. The commander carried out the order, risking the ship and the sailors. He could not fail to fulfill it. It's another matter why the Americans did not open fire on our ships. I would, as the commander of a ship attacked (bulk), would certainly have demolished the entire commander's superstructure to the "bulkhead". Perhaps he also received an order not to open fire.

[Diana Ilyina]

Quote: Алексей_К

He probably also received orders not to open fire.

Open fire on ships while in their territorial waters, nu-nu ...! Or do you think that all American captains are Faberge from titanium ?!

[Ajent cho]

Quote: Алексей_К

I would, as the commander of a ship attacked (bulk), would certainly have demolished the entire commander's superstructure to the "bulkhead"

If grandmother had xyz, she would be grandfather.
That is, to enter into other people's terror and start to naughty - is this, in your opinion, right? Hard case.

[joopel]

Yes, it was a song! Such a fabulous bulk!

[Engineer]

It was necessary to open the lids of the X-35 launch containers and the water around Gravley would be painted in a characteristic color.

[donavi49]

Not. X-35 there is ballast, like Harpoons at Burke. There are distances in meters ... RCC will not take it, only if you do a bypass (TsU at 10 miles, followed by a turn at 180 and turning on the radar - further according to the standard). However, in this case it will not be up to the missiles anymore, and the missile will be shot after.

At that distance, only the gun and MZA + machine guns.

From the real, it was possible to give from a machine gun - a turn at the rate, or from Cortik. But this is a real aggravation. Plus, Burke has an 5 inch, which is much more dangerous and more productive than a hundredth.

[gispanec]

it is strange that no one has written about diapers yet .... after all, when the reverse situevina - the idiots excitedly describe diapers ...

[prior]

"Yaroslav the Wise" showed wisdom, and therefore the destroyer Gravely is still afloat.

[Aleksey_K]

Quote: prior

"Yaroslav the Wise" showed wisdom, and therefore the destroyer Gravely is still afloat.

What are you writing nonsense. The captain of the ship "Yaroslav the Wise" showed no wisdom. In the Army and the Navy, orders from higher-ranking commanders are carried out. He does what he is ordered to do. In peacetime, captains will not make a step to the left or right without an order. During hostilities, they are given independence within the limits of the task being performed.

[bmv04636]

you want to say when the "light elves" were rammed in the Black Sea there was such an order. I doubt something

[Vladimirets]

Quote: bmv04636

when the "light elves" were rammed in the Black Sea there was such an order. I doubt something

Was, was.

[avg-mgn]

Quote: Black

Lost, maybe.? Would you like to ask for a road?

Yeah, "how to get to the library"?

[gg.na]

Cap of amerovsky destroyer: - "Halloween rush!"
Captain of the RUSSIAN watchdog: -I don’t understand ! Like this, sucks painted ??! Left side, two torpedo attacks !!! "

[dchegrinec]

Well, Americans love to indulge in what can be done, although the brown eyes themselves are squeezed to the limit when we swim near them. These stories have probably happened since the fifties.

[Banishing liberoids]

It was necessary to use an imitation of a tyrant or a bulk - they would see how bold the Yankees were.

[alexfin]

... ram most likely ..

[AlexTires]

It was necessary to use an imitation of a tyrant or a bulk - they would see how bold the Yankees were.

ours disdained, because most likely the superstructure of the US destroyer was heroically behind .. by sailors even before the ship lay on another tack ...

[PValery53]

Tyrants wandered to you by accident.

[donavi49]

The ship is only out of repair. It's a pity. Plus, this Burke 2 series in the stern has nothing interesting, unlike the nose of the Wise.

[Wiruz]

Plus, this Burke 2 series aft has nothing interesting, unlike the nose of the Wise.

Here, please, in more detail, if possible

[Mengad]

Revenge for the destroyer “Donald Cook”

[Art777]

And he started to run off test, when ours went across to him ..

[Aleksey_K]

Quote: Art777

At the same time, the Russian warship followed in international waters a constant course and speed and did not carry out any dangerous maneuvering with respect to the American ship.

And you are an inventor, well, just like our journalists, Russian.
Quote from the article: "At the same time, the Russian warship followed a constant course and speed in international waters and did not carry out any dangerous maneuvers in relation to the American ship."

[kot423]

Quote: gispanec

it is strange that no one has written about diapers yet .... after all, when the reverse situevina - the idiots excitedly describe diapers ...

Maybe you didn’t notice, but it seems we took the striped tactics. It is necessary to declare to the whole world that striped - and let them make excuses ... Example: scandal about Russian diplomats in mattress, now they (p.i.dosy) nervously say in the media that this is not so, it is in Russia all striped diplomats (with families) were forced to walk on a rope and to the toilet on a call ... :)

[Mountain shooter]

Something about the past was so inspired ... Just like in the good old days, when our squadrons went through the Mediterranean one after another, periodically crossing the course dangerously or leaning in from the stern ... Ships are needed, many and different. Impudent Yankees.

[atamankko]

Provocateurs, they are also provocateurs in the Mediterranean Sea.

[izya top]

begin to check the strength? find out if there is enough political leadership for a direct clash? the servicemen are ready

[alexfin]

..and maybe they wanted to say hello or exchange chewing gum for vodka ..

[SeregaBoss]

I think in vain our military told about this incident, well, it was, well, they forgot, and our captains should be ready for such "maneuvers". The one who laughs last laughs well! The Stars and Stripes don't know that?

[Signal]

Video on the website of TK "Zvezda" http://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201606281448-krym.htm

[AlexTires]

Americans - arrogant guys - go around without turn signals, as at home, I’m afraid I wouldn’t have to launch missiles without stoplights ...

Even vidyuha is ....


Submits the rear under the impact of the main gun direct fire.

[Vladimirets]

Quote: AlexTires

Even vidyuha is ....

In general, then, nothing dangerous, “Burke” and maybe more speed, and he had a head start. Simple maritime rudeness.

[figwam]

Apparently Pindocics got into the habit of exposing their ass.

[donavi49]

Rather, they cut on overtaking.

Burke 5 has an inch. Although from this angle, it is indeed possible to disassemble a half-ship, while they are turned to a degree, in order to answer with 5 inches.

[Vladimirets]

Quote: donavi49

Although in this perspective, it is indeed possible to disassemble a half-ship, while they are turned to a degree, to answer from 5 inches.

While he twists, he already with AK-100 robust can be thrown.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Quote: donavi49

Rather, they cut on overtaking.

Burke 5 has an inch. Although from this angle, it is indeed possible to disassemble a half-ship, while they are turned to a degree, in order to answer with 5 inches.

While it will turn it out and the nose gun will be demolished, at such a distance the missile weapons of the destroyer are useless, we win by cannon.

[KVIRTU]

What kind of people. No number, no flag.

[Lt. Air Force stock]

Quote: AlexTires

Submits the rear under the impact of the main gun direct fire.

Alternatively, the nasal cannon could be turned towards the destroyer and left the rudder when leveled.

[ioann1]

Pure water provocation. They cannot forgive the Soviet rebuff in the Black Sea.

Colonel General Leonid Ivashov: It seems that NATO is preparing for war with Russia

- What is the purpose of such a war?

- The Americans are doing everything to push Europe and Turkey with Russia. And unleash a big military conflict. For the United States, it is strategically important to stop the revival of Russia. After all, Russia is not just becoming an independent state, but a global geopolitical player. I would even say one of the geopolitical centers of the world. It becomes the “supporting structure” of the new world order. Americans are being squeezed out of vast space - Russia and China are already the main players there. And we remember that Brzezinski said in the early 90s: that Eurasia is a prize to the victor in the Cold War. And here in the USA this prize is being carried away from under the nose. Americans don’t like it.

They do not like the fact that we began to return to the Arctic. This region also began to float away from them.

Because the Americans are bustling. There is only one goal - to stop Russia.

[Joe stalin]

Obama's ass, and the ship has FOOD!

[Sasha_Sar]

International Regulations for the Prevention of Collisions between Ships (COLREGs-71). For the author, not 71, but 72

[Karasik]

Quote: Sasha_Sar

International Regulations for the Prevention of Collisions between Ships (COLREGs-71). For the author, not 71, but 72

Great, colleague! I also immediately "hit my eyes" what kind of COLREGs-71 such that I have never heard of? Well, the COLREG-72 is the "Bible" for the navigator!

[Joe stalin]

This is not the Bible, but traffic rules

[Sasha_Sar]

71 this is for "navigators"

[Prisoner]

It looks like the team on the mattress trough was specially assembled from masochists.

[PValery53]

In general, they have there - BDSM.

[russmensch]

Lost seen Americans last years. They decided to scare us. So to refresh the memory, let these frames look at the frames. http://kobtv.narod.ru/documental/taran.html After all, they themselves filmed and shouted with horror then. Personnel February 12, 1988.

[Enoch]

As children, they decided to drive out their sandbox in front of us in revenge for the passage of our aircraft. Dividends to the elections - Obama is fulfilling the order.

[Chukcha]

I thought so too.

[Dave36]

Yes, ours also went to the cut ... did not let the Amers relax!

[3 Gorynych]

Judging by the video, ours also decided to buttle !!

[PValery53]

Of course, next time, let this American destroyer Gravely not substitute her side in order to avoid possible rescue operations on their side.

[viktor.]

why is it afloat? it would be necessary to catch up and drown so as not to stink .

[Banishing liberoids]

Who did they try to run into, the old man of Project 11540?

[AlexTires]

Quote: Vladimirets

Simple sea rudeness.

Definitely...

[Titsen]

Where will Wiruz come from?

[Wiruz]

Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. I can send a picture with the latest local newspaper number

[Prisoner]

Such excesses do not threaten you.

[pig killer]

Such situations were especially often provoked by the US Navy and aircraft during the Caribbean crisis.

[Joe stalin]

"violated the international rules for preventing collisions of ships (COLREGs-71). American sailors ignored rule 13 (" Overtaking ")" - to take away the captain's license to drive the ship and tow it to a fines!

[pig killer]

Quote: gispanec

it is strange that no one has written about diapers yet .... after all, when the reverse situevina - the idiots excitedly describe diapers ...

So far, only you have written about diapers. Russian sailors are not required.

[Koshak]

On the road (and not only) I usually wish this: that you get what you run into! Simply put, so you can do it right!

[HAM]

Now the Americans will get the Purple Heart at least. The Rambs ...

[gladysheff2010]

Quote: Vladimirets

If we ourselves are flying next to them, then we also need, respectively, to squeeze a point into a fist and work on, rather than start yelling at the whole world.

I do not agree. Russian pilots acted near the borders of their state, if you talk about it. The Americans, provoking a collision of ships, did it far from their shores and risking the lives of several hundred people — irresponsible teenage behavior (bravado)!

[Victorio]

Quote: gladysheff2010

Quote: Vladimirets

If we ourselves are flying next to them, then we also need, respectively, to squeeze a point into a fist and work on, rather than start yelling at the whole world.

I do not agree. Russian pilots acted near the borders of their state, if you talk about it. The Americans, provoking a collision of ships, did it far from their shores and risking the lives of several hundred people — irresponsible teenage behavior (bravado)!

====
really, but what would be the reaction / action to the constant / frequent barrage of Russian ships off the coast of America?

[Vladimirets]

Quote: Victorio

constant / frequent barrage of Russian ships off the coast of America?

Submarines are considered?

[Titsen]

Amerikos decided to avenge a ram in the Black Sea during the Soviet era!

[Titsen]

Why then

Quote: Wiruz

Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.

so vicious against Russia?

PS Photo is not necessary!

[Wiruz]

so vicious against Russia?

Excuse me, in what place did I “spitefully” speak about Russia ?! This has never happened! Another thing is that I have never hidden my extremely negative attitude towards the "urya-patriots"

[Holsten]

We urgently need to conduct an exercise in the Mediterranean Sea with an underwater launch of "Caliber" - there are enough targets.

[Aleksey_K]

Most readers perceive this case as arrogant behavior of Americans or as hooliganism in neutral waters.
Neither one nor the other. In the event of a dangerous rapprochement of the ships, our ship had to turn on all military equipment to start hostilities. This was necessary for the Americans. They simply listened to all frequency ranges, all conversations, all sounds, tried to intercept and record secret information for the purpose of further decryption, so that in the event of a real war, either read or try to muffle all our radio frequencies and disarm the ship.

[Wiruz]

Just the same thing that our Drying, together with the Bastion, did in the Crimea, in 2014

[Bramb]

And spare frequencies, like, no? And to find out these frequencies, went for a provocation? The captain, seeing a strange ship near, immediately switched to secret frequencies and calls the commander in chief?
So naive that even I, the land one, do not believe in it.

[Aleksey_K]

Quote: Bramb

And spare frequencies, like, no? And to find out these frequencies, went for a provocation? The captain, seeing a strange ship near, immediately switched to secret frequencies and calls the commander in chief?
So naive that even I, the land one, do not believe in it.

When ours drowned out all the equipment from Donald Cook, then the Americans probably had spare frequencies, then you believed that the Americans had done it. And in this case, don’t believe that the Americans are listening to all frequency ranges, all conversations, all sounds, trying to intercept and record secret information with the aim of further decryption. I would like the Americans to know everything about our capabilities, are they spying or do you not believe in this?
By the way, you land - the military has no secret frequencies, there are spare frequencies. And I’ll add, what then do scouts find out when flying along our borders. Really only poison the air with waste from the combustion of kerosene? Here are some hooligans. But ours, ours, then why are they chasing them, do they really want to take a boarding?

[keeper03]

It was reconnaissance "in force". Jackals are getting impudent every day!

[Bramb]

It seemed to me that ours began to turn quietly in his direction - and he fell to the side. To get a nose in the barrel - you can drown.
Are the sailors here? What do you think?

[a housewife]

I, of course, am not a sailor, but I will never forget how the Admiral Nakhimov was sunk in Novorossiysk! The captains were too sure that they would disperse. Such distances are extremely dangerous!

[beer-youk]

Quote: gg.na

Or both of them in one bottle!

Rather, they are the same loshars as their pilots.

[SerB60]

Quote: Wiruz

You sir panic more)

No one is panicking. More precisely, I definitely do not, for the rest I do not know.

It's just that everyone here is so happy when the Su-24, according to tradition, imitates an attack on American destroyers, either in the Black Sea or the Baltic. All this happens in neutral waters, albeit near Russia. And after all, few people understand that American ships, in this case, have every right to shoot down our aircraft.

And now here is a similar situation, although it is not an imitation of an attack on our ship. Read the comments: everyone around is unhappy with the action of the American destroyer. How does is called? An hour not "double standards ?!

"They have the right to knock down ..." Why are you smoking, sick?

[Wiruz]

Blue Rosemans. But from the salary I pamper myself with the Silver Parliament.

Do you think that flying over a warship of one country with a military plane of another country is not enough reason for the first to have the right to shoot down the second? While the action takes place in neutral waters

[SerB60]

It is good that you are not the commander of the Pavlodar, or God forbid, the American fleet.
What is the internationally justified right to bring down aircraft flying over a ship in neutral waters. Link to the studio.

[Wiruz]

http://flot.com/law/sealaw/isl.htm#5

The fifth section. Twelfth paragraph below. Maybe there is something else written there, but I'm tired of reading something

[SerB60]

International law has traditionally recognized the coastal state the right to pursue or arrest in the open sea a foreign ship that violated its laws and regulations while the ship was in inland waters, the territorial sea or the adjacent zone of that state. This right is also extended by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea to violations of the laws and regulations of a coastal state relating to the continental shelf and the exclusive economic zone. The pursuit must be conducted in hot pursuit, that is, it can begin when the intruder is respectively in the inland waters, the territorial sea, the adjacent zone, in the waters covering the continental shelf, or in the exclusive economic zone of the coastal state, and should be carried out continuously. In this case, the pursuit of "hot pursuit" ends as soon as the pursued ship enters the territorial sea of ​​his country or third state. Continuing the persecution in a foreign territorial sea would be incompatible with the sovereignty of the state to which this sea belongs.
Fifth Section, Twelfth Paragraph Bottom of International Law of the Sea. Where's the right to shoot down flying planes, mr, umm ... like, telling a lie?

[Kibl]

So not in the first, American capes think of themselves as horse jockeys. During the times of the USSR in our Baltic countries they also forced, but as soon as our plane showed up, they only saw them.

[sergey2017]

Quote: Mercenary

"Take away rights" and evacuate the vehicle to a fine parking!

You can, of course, humor as much as you like about this, but before the Americans did not "joke" with our Navy ships! Apparently, the Americans consider the presence of the Russian Navy in the Mediterranean Sea unacceptable, thus they want to show their privileged right! This is all reminiscent of the behavior of a courtyard bully, do not walk around my yard, and if you do, do not forget who is in charge here. For the stupid Americans it has not yet reached that the Russian Navy did not come to the Mediterranean Sea to visit, but returned "as if it were home" and will be here permanently! And "hooligans" must be taught rigidly, within the limits of course reasonable!

[goblin xnumx]

he returned — home — how loud — that is when the para-cruisers and heels of full-fledged destroyers return — then it will be possible to say that it is possible to go through the yard — and then — rather than dictate, the behavior was corrected — the fleet is still weak against the amers ...

[drunkram]

You might think this is a problem, we wanted to spit what they consider in their place not acceptable

[tundra]

Quote: razmik72

This time the captain’s nerves were stronger.

Yes, it was necessary without shooting, just put the art installation on the navigation bridge.
How long would they then launder it.

[goblin xnumx]

you are so naive, but don’t you think that a submarine could be present nearby? - we’ll scream everyone and give examples of actions from history- (not ours) - easily- although I'm glad that you are not on the bridge with your manners ...: )

[sergey2017]

One could act like in the Black Sea in 1988! There was another situation then, the question was about determining the boundary of territorial waters, namely: the line from which the 12-mile zone of territorial waters should be counted. In the United States, it was argued that counting should be from every point on the coastline. The Soviet Union adhered to the principle of the so-called “baseline”: for example, when determining the territorial water zone in the bays, the distance to the border was counted not from the coastline, but from the line connecting the inlet capes of the bays. The question was fundamental! American cruiser "Yorktown" in the territorial zone!

[Aleksey_K]

Quote: sergey2017

The commander of the TFR "Bezavavetny" literally pushed the American cruiser "Yorktown" into the territorial zone!

This became possible because these ships have almost the same speed. Our "Yaroslav the Wise" has a speed lower than that of the destroyer "Gravely". The video clearly shows how the amerikos cut off our ship, overtaking it, and went to the side.

[Aleksey_K]

Quote: tundra

Quote: razmik72

This time the captain’s nerves were stronger.

Yes, it was necessary without shooting, just put the art installation on the navigation bridge.
How long would they then launder it.

And I think the other way around, if our watchman only tried to start shelling, the destroyer, as a more powerful and more armed ship, would destroy our watchdog and from our ship only any junk would float on the surface of the water. This we call this class of ships - the destroyer, and the Americans call their ships - destroyer, i.e. destroyer, fighter, not destroyer.
This destroyer has a displacement of more than 2 times greater than that of our guard, and there are enough weapons to destroy several guard patrols, and the speed is higher, it is not for nothing that in the video it cropped so easily and sidestepped. Our guard was simply unable to catch up with him. Unfortunately, modern American destroyers are better than our watchdogs.

[NEXUS]

Quote: Алексей_К

And I think the other way around, if our watchman only tried to start shelling, then the destroyer, as a more powerful and more armed ship, would destroy our watchdog and from our ship only any junk would float on the surface of the water.

Do you really think that within a radius of 300-500 miles there were no more our warships and not only surface ships? If an American would only try to rock the boat, he would be 100% likely to feed the fish with the whole crew.

Quote: Алексей_К

This destroyer has a displacement of more than 2 times more than that of our guard, and there are enough weapons to destroy several of the guard,

The navel doesn’t get loose, then some watchdogs drown alone? The arsenal of our RTOs is not at all toy.

Quote: Алексей_К

Unfortunately, modern American destroyers are better than our watchdogs.

You are not comparing the comparable. With the same success, you can compare the BTR with MBT ...

[afrikanez]

This is certainly not the Black Sea, but the bulk could have been repeated, otherwise they probably forgot already.

[sergey2017]

This is not forgotten! One captain of the second rank of the Navy said that such situations in seafarers in the classroom are sorted out to the smallest detail! One wrong step and all!

[S_Baykala]

I didn’t see anything extraordinary, all the more "blatant" (here is the word Klintsevich quoted, just some hysterical one). Passed and passed. Hopefully, in such cases, the necessary actions have been thought out a long time ago (for example, putting weapons on alert, target designation for missile armament and main battery, or other), which cool the enemy's heads as much as possible. In general, our patrol boat did not even change its course and direction. This is correct.
And as V. Kamoyedov (ex-commander-in-chief of the Black Sea Fleet) correctly noted, “The incident with the destroyer of the US Navy is not worthy of attention and relevant comments”

[goblin xnumx]

I agree with you and with the ex-commander in chief :)

[SerB60]

Quote: SerB60

Quote: Wiruz

You sir panic more)

No one is panicking. More precisely, I definitely do not, for the rest I do not know.

It's just that everyone here is so happy when the Su-24, according to tradition, imitates an attack on American destroyers, either in the Black Sea or the Baltic. All this happens in neutral waters, albeit near Russia. And after all, few people understand that American ships, in this case, have every right to shoot down our aircraft.

And now here is a similar situation, although it is not an imitation of an attack on our ship. Read the comments: everyone around is unhappy with the action of the American destroyer. How does is called? An hour not "double standards ?!

"They have the right to knock down ..." Why are you smoking, sick?

And what, minus is easier to slap than to answer in essence? So I will ask again: by what right in international waters do Americans "have every right to shoot down" our planes?
Even with imitation of attacks, even with a "dangerous approach" to ships?

[made13]

17 days passed from 28 to 10. So our Strategic Missile Forces will destroy the states, and we will find out in a year or two.

[bald]

Our guys from Yaroslav are great! The rumba was not to the side and the knots were not thrown off. And the American rabble always reeked of rottenness. It won't rust behind us.

[Mama_Cholli]

They drive boats like women drive cars (I saw the window of a clothing store and immediately turned to the curb without turning signals, without looking to both sides).

[fedor13]

There was nothing really terrible in the passage, there was enough space for both in case of force majeure. Not battleships anyway. But how they allowed this to happen and what actions they took was more interesting.

[cergey51046]

Open the warning message, if they don’t hear it, drown it.

[behemot]

They're begging for a kick in the face, big-fingered creatures.

[Bort radist]

The Americans really didn’t want us to take this course. I had to cut it. Somehow they didn’t cover whether “Yaroslav the Wise” was changing direction or not. This is the US response to the fleet in a situation where they rushed towards our base, and then could not understand “why the planes were flying across the course.”

[ALEA IACTA EST]

Apparently, they forgot how this could end...
Once in a century, a patrol boat chases a cruiser.

[1536]

Could have been sunk by our frigate.
In general, what can we expect from the descendants of former slave traders whom our sailors caught and hanged on yards? But these ones are clearly in trouble! They'll get it in full

[Valter1364]

The distance along the course in the video is clearly greater than one cable length.
I did not see any particular threat of collision with the current Radar-ARPA navigation systems.
Yes, this is outright rudeness, a violation of the rules of COLREG-72 and a clear lack of respect for the flag.
What did you expect from these freaks? What else did you expect?

[DPN]

To stern it and board it, don’t bother fooling around with it.

[chunga-changa]

Judging by the video, everything was much more interesting. Directly on our course, 5-6 km ahead, an American aircraft carrier is already visible. That is, in theory, it could have been fired at from the SKR cannon, so the Americans got worried. Like, “buddy, take it to the right, otherwise the boys on the aircraft carrier are getting bored.”

[Darth Revan]

Quote: razmik72

Based on the behavior of the captain of the patrol ship "Smetlivy", the captain of "Yaroslav the Mudry" could also have opened warning fire, a large number of forum users support such a decision, but the captain of the "American" could also turn out to be a "gambler" person and in response he could also "shoot". "American" is clearly not a "fisherman", he had something to answer.

And then - hello, Exterminatus!

[Sergey333]

They started brazenly provoking them - they really want to start the 3rd World War.

[VOEVODA]

one unpunished hooliganism (our air force) gives rise to another (American). The main thing is that it all doesn’t end badly. The Americans may be gans.... they, but the commanders of their different levels can independently make decisions to open fire and not only us since the Second World War only by decision of a senior commander, and even more so in neutral waters. We must mutually observe international rules and regulations

[Garris199]

Do you like to trim mattresses? Send “Peter” there, let them play checkers with him.

[masiya]

Well, this is terrible, everyone has gathered to discuss, but there is no point, we should not discuss, but drive this American trash away from our borders with a filthy broom, no matter where they appear... and maybe then there will be a result...!!!

[dvg1959]

Non-professional rudeness only causes irony.
They want to show themselves in all their glory, but it doesn’t work out.
Kuram laughs.

[Mister22408]

They say here that there was an indication from their side... Ours could have thrown a little onto the boat at the same time... from the aft deck...

[evge-malyshev]

Ultimately, “Yaroslav the Wise” behaved with dignity. He did not succumb to provocation (and outright rudeness).

[kolexxx]

The ship's commander would not have undertaken such a maneuver of his own free will. So some kind of task was set. For example, provoke some actions on our part. We figured out what was what and reported back 10 days later. The question is closed.

[trophy]

Unprofessionalism is a rather abstract concept, but dibilism is a completely medical term. This is what the flawed people in the Pentagon need to talk about. And our guys are great, they didn’t fall for weakness. We will wait for response.

[lecturer]

ORDER
Captain Vrungel!

While overtaking our yacht"byThe trouble"

various mattress covers or similar enemy troughs, IMMEDIATELY(!) mechanic Scrap, open all the side hawse valves and drain all the evil spirits from the fecal and bilge holds overboard!
PS Hey, smell the stench and calm down...

[Evil 55]

As they say, if “something itches, then it’s either a bad disease or fleas.”. The captain of the floating mattress apparently has some of the above in stock..

[Wolka]

Why didn’t our Marines use on-board electronic warfare? The Yankees’ arrogance would have immediately subsided, they are terrified of our electronic warfare systems when their ships instantly lose orientation and fire control

[Zomanus]

Damn, as I remember, we always competed with the Americans in the sea.
And to rub in a “partner” was generally in the order of things.
The main thing is that there are no casualties or significant damage.

[Ros 56]

I perceive these maneuvers of the American destroyer as pitiful and inept attempts to repeat the actions of our patrol boat to expel the striped ones from the Black Sea. By the way, recently they tried to do something similar in the air. My brain is strained. Well, what can we take from these wretched striped ones, all their lives, like gypsies, they are begged all over the world by smart people and their ideas and actions.

[drunkram]

From such a distance, even with onboard guns... eh

[candidate]

The mast falls on course
It's breaking the ute - don't you know?

[then]

This behavior indicates that the go-ahead has been given to start a mess or death convulsions.

[nik517]

https://youtu.be/BYq79uCiU_4
Maybe this is how they should do it?

[neo1200]

In war it’s like in war. There's no need to be a bitch about it.

[Old warrior]

Why didn’t he drown due to “inevitable accidents at sea”?

[Patriot]

Does anyone know what Americans write about this? Guess what, our people were chasing them, but they barely got away. And they didn’t respond to the provocation, and thereby saved world peace again

[Oblomov]

What kind of hysteria? Do you expect anything else from these goats?

[Maxim73]

There is nothing to comment on, but the population is hysterical! On Saturday, Kiselyov will tell how Russia confronted the United States in the Mediterranean Sea...ugh

[gattus]

Judging by the squeals from the Pentagon, our destroyer “unprofessionally” avoided a collision with the American one.

[gattus]

Judging by the squeals from the Pentagon, our patrol ship “unprofessionally” avoided a collision with an American destroyer.

[Transport]

Quote: Stock Officer

Dangerous driving. Take the rights from the captain of the American destroyer. You can pay the fine at any branch of Sberbank.

And also make you breathe))) In a bag!!!))) Suddenly the adversary is also drunk)))

[Voenoboz]

You need to butt him.

[Robert Nevsky]

Sink the American destroyer!!!

[Navigator Basov]

Anchor "Yaroslav the Wise" to the helipad.

[Mengad]

Quote: razmik72

A similar situation occurred with another Russian patrol ship in the Aegean Sea on December 13, 2015, when the Smetlivy patrol ship opened warning fire on a Turkish fishing seiner approaching it. This time the captain's nerves were stronger.

quote: “At 9.03 Moscow time, the ship’s watch service discovered at a distance of about 1 thousand meters a Turkish ship approaching the anchored patrol ship “Smetlivy” from the starboard side. Despite numerous attempts by the Smetlivy, the crew of the Turkish seiner did not make radio contact with the Russian sailors and did not respond to special visual signals from the light semaphore and flares,,

[gavrik]

They are so pathetic, these Americans... They no longer know how to spoil us. And Yaroslav is the Wise... he would have figured out how to deal with this presumptuous fish.

[fesco]

I read somewhere that ours hung the flag ball - diamond - ball (problems with maneuvering), but in fact a member

[SERGUNCHOs]

Next time, give it full throttle and turn its entire chassis around with its nose. There have already been cases where they were hit on the side, all the superstructures, guns, everything that came under attack was demolished.

[t118an]

I see here the analysis is going on as when performing a dangerous maneuver according to automobile rules... (as on the road .. I don’t have rules for driving navigation and small vessels)... then let the destroyer "Gravly" and others like it next time... look around and in the rear-view mirrors, and how they “listen in the compartments” .. what if where is the “Combat Classic” type Shch-408 (Soviet diesel-electric torpedo submarine from the Second World War, belongs to the X-bis series of the Shch project - “ Pike").. will hide or emerge... This happens on the roads... A Lexus is driving and it’s at full speed.. Our “Bash”... but it happens..

[SerB60]

Quote: SerB60

International law has traditionally recognized the coastal state the right to pursue or arrest in the open sea a foreign ship that violated its laws and regulations while the ship was in inland waters, the territorial sea or the adjacent zone of that state. This right is also extended by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea to violations of the laws and regulations of a coastal state relating to the continental shelf and the exclusive economic zone. The pursuit must be conducted in hot pursuit, that is, it can begin when the intruder is respectively in the inland waters, the territorial sea, the adjacent zone, in the waters covering the continental shelf, or in the exclusive economic zone of the coastal state, and should be carried out continuously. In this case, the pursuit of "hot pursuit" ends as soon as the pursued ship enters the territorial sea of ​​his country or third state. Continuing the persecution in a foreign territorial sea would be incompatible with the sovereignty of the state to which this sea belongs.
Fifth Section, Twelfth Paragraph Bottom of International Law of the Sea. Where's the right to shoot down flying planes, mr, umm ... like, telling a lie?

Opponent WIRUZ was blown away. And what an excuse was invented))) “... maybe there’s something else written there,” but, like, don’t care, look for it yourself. Chukchi is a writer, not a reader.

[akmoa781]

Having staged another provocation in international waters, our worst friends announced that the Russians were again to blame for everything. The “s” have a very meek memory, they don’t have enough blood and they can’t quench their thirst. There have been more than one times when, because of these “Dolboyaschers,” we had to clean up what they had done.