In a referendum in Britain won ... Putin

214
According to the most recent data, 52 percent of the British voted at the referendum were in favor of secession of the kingdom from the European Union. The turnout was high: 72,1% of voters showed up at the polling stations. The career of Prime Minister Cameron, who spoke in favor of preserving EU membership, can be considered complete. Experts believe that luck has turned away from the politician. But his opponents, including the former Mayor of London B. Johnson, triumph.



Recall, June 23 in the UK held a referendum on the future membership of the kingdom in the European Union. The British answered the only question: “Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?” On the eve of the plebiscite, sociological studies showed that the number of opponents and supporters of Brexit was approximately equal. According to some polls, the number of supporters for maintaining EU membership slightly exceeded the number of opponents.

Experts predicted in the event of the kingdom leaving the European Union a “collapse” of the pound sterling, difficult and long negotiations with Brussels, Britain’s problems in international business and even a decline in world oil prices. One of the manifestations of the probable victory of supporters of secession from the EU in Britain was the mass buying up of gold by the British, and at the same time safes: people are afraid of a strong drop in the pound sterling.

Voting results with graphs and regional data can now be viewed on the English-language website "BBC".

TV and Radio Company "BBC" reports that 52 percent of Britons voted for the country's withdrawal from the EU. The data was made public based on 374 votes from 382 constituencies.

The company's website indicates that 16,8 million people voted for leaving the union, and 15,7 million - for maintaining membership in the EU. "BBC" notes that the advantage to the opponents of Brexit "is already mathematically impossible."

It is also indicated that in Northern Ireland and Scotland and most of the districts voted against leaving the EU. So did the voters in London.

As we wrote on "IN"In the United Kingdom, the “Scottish Question” can be exacerbated.

21 Jun. Nicola Sturgen, leader of the Scottish National Party, said that if the UK leaves the European Union, Scotland will hold a second referendum on secession from the United Kingdom.

According to Sturgen, most of the Scots want to save the state within the European Union.

Obviously, the Scots really want to live in the EU, and therefore in the future another referendum could take place - already on the separation of Scotland from the United Kingdom.

Europe’s reaction to historical the event in the UK was truly turbulent.

One of the first responded to the vote is Marine Le Pen, the leader of the French National Front. She wrote in "Twitter" on the victory of freedom: "Victoire de la liberté!" and called for "to hold similar referendums in France and in other EU countries."

"Deutsche Welle" cites a statement by the chairman of the European Parliament, Martin Schulz. In an interview with the German television channel ZDF, he announced that Brussels was ready to leave the UK from the EU.

According to Mr. Schulz, the process of negotiations on withdrawal will begin quickly.

Earlier, analysts assured that the process of negotiations with the EU is a long and tedious business. However, the statement of Schultz shows that they are not going to pull the cat by the tail in Brussels. True, the procedure for leaving the EU has not yet been tested. Well, someone must be first!

Deutsche Welle publishes a statement by German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier. He is disappointed with the results of the British plebiscite: "Newscoming from the UK are truly disappointing. This is a sad day for the UK and Europe. ”

The leader of the British United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) Nigel Faraj has just demanded resignation of Prime Minister David Cameron. He believes that the best candidate for this post is now the former mayor of London, Boris Johnson (recall, one of the most ardent supporters of the exit of Britain from the EU).

In a referendum in Britain won ... Putin

Nigel Faraj and his supporters celebrate victory


As for the forecasts for the probable depreciation of the pound sterling, then analysts have hit the mark.

The exchange rate of the British currency against the US dollar against the background of a vote fell by 11,1%, which is the lowest figure in the last thirty years.

On the eve of the results of the referendum, we note that the price of oil has also decreased. Today, the decline in prices continued. Variety Brent fell in price with 51 already to 48,3 dollars per barrel.

Recall the recent statement by the British Prime Minister David Cameron. A month ago he говорилthat a British exit from the European Union could bring happiness to Vladimir Putin.

There is no news about happy Putin yet. On the contrary, against the background of a rapid fall in oil prices, the president of an oil-producing country can hardly be happy.

In addition, earlier during the SPIEF, the head of the Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation, Alexei Ulyukayev, warned about the negative impact of a possible British exit from the EU. This increases instability in the oil market, he noted, and for Russia "this would mean greater volatility and additional problems."

But here are statements from the USA. They are also devoted to Putin.

One of the first to speak was ex-US ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul. According to him, he won on a plebiscite in Britain ... Putin.

Michael McFaul considered the results of the referendum on UK membership in the EU victory of President Vladimir Putin. About this he wrote in his "Twitter".

“Today it is a giant victory for the purposes of Putin’s foreign policy. Pay tribute to him ", - quotes the former diplomat "Lenta.ru".

Mr. McFaul still admits that the victory of supporters of the refusal of British membership in the EU is not the personal merit of the Russian president, but she, no doubt, "serves his long-term goals in Europe."

“Putin complained about the collapse of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact, so he is glad to see a split in European unity,” the ex-ambassador added.

* * *


Thus, it is possible to predict the coming retirement for Prime Minister Cameron. Previously, he claimed that he would retain his post “in any case,” but Western experts and local politicians strongly doubt this. Former London Mayor Boris Johnson may well sit on his chair.

You can also assume some instability in oil prices (however, experts do not believe in a long fluctuation) and the depreciation of the pound sterling. Against the background of London’s future talks with Brussels, some political instability is expected: it is not for nothing that Marine Le Pen makes bold statements, reminding of the dissatisfaction of many right-wing parties in Europe with the “dictate” of Brussels.

Another question is interesting, which analysts often bypass, or forget about it. The fact is that the results of the referendum held are not legally binding. The UK government is not obliged to obey the results of the vote. But the thing is that the referendum was initiated by none other than Mr. Cameron himself. And his political career is now really close to dusk. This “loser”, as opponents call it in Britain, is unlikely to be able to refuse to recognize the voting results.

Observed and commented on Oleg Chuvakin
- especially for topwar.ru
    Our news channels

    Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

    214 comments
    Information
    Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
    1. +29
      24 June 2016 09: 55
      Long live the GDP !!! But, if a little more serious smile then the Britons got serious problems on their fifth point. the autocracy didn’t bring any good, the demands, at least in Scotland, to hold a second referendum and secede from the UK, may follow, I remember very well that the Scots should be blackmailed, that if if they vote in their referendum to leave Velik, they will automatically lose their membership in the EU and they will have to join the EU again, which is great laughing he will not allow it by applying the right of veto. That is, the Veliki were engaged in outright blackmail. I wonder what they will say now?
      1. +19
        24 June 2016 09: 58
        Quote: razmik72
        Long live the GDP !!!

        The referendum is not legally binding, that is, the government can independently decide the fate of the country. So is it a victory? Well, the opinion of the people, but who cares.
        1. +11
          24 June 2016 10: 05
          Quote: Wend
          So is it a victory?

          The old woman may and will remain in the union, but Brussels and some countries will have to "move" and by the way, the British initially kept themselves apart and did not strive to leave their pound sterling in the euro zone.
          1. +58
            24 June 2016 10: 14
            Repost.
            The mouse's tears will flow to the cat ... This is for you "S ... and island" for the USSR ...
            Supporters of the exit from the EU Competently played on British nationalism and even dragged the "decrepit Lizka", they say, to your question, give me at least three reasons why we should stay in the EU did not receive a single answer ...
            The fairy tale affects quickly, but the business is not done quickly (but it is being done) The EU is falling apart, which I am personally happy about, and it’s not even a matter of delayed revenge for that nay ... about which our country went through believing its "Western partners" in 1991. No, the EU / NATO / US Harem is much more beneficial for the Russian Federation in a disassembled state, and even more so without such countries as the Great Britain, sick with "Russophobia Rabies". Poland would have left the EU ... But Psheki will be blown out of it last to the last sucking / sucking the juices from the rich Western Europe.
            I am VERY waiting for the separation of Scotland and Northern Ireland from Great Britain (the latter’s reunion with Ireland), and let Wales (yes, I’m going to Wales) even get married with England. England has always been the ETERNAL VRGOM: Rus, the TsR, RI, the RSFSR, the USSR, and the Russian Federation. Germany, France, the USA and even Poland are coming Russophobia, but English Russophobia is ETERNAL. Look where everything r ... o settles (thieves, killers, perverts, degenerates, traitors) from the Central Committee of the USSR and the Russian Federation and you’ll understand everything ...

            P.S. I wish the "decrepit Windsors" of Scotland and Northern Ireland as soon as possible. You can and should work with these guys! In the end, Russia and these two hopefully in the near future of the country, are connected by one important circumstance - Hatred and meanness towards them on the part of England.
            This does not apply to the great English Culture, the actors of Great Britain and even (forgive the Lord). What has been said here refers to the military-political course of England of Great Britain towards Russia. And it is to the state of Great Britain (and not the country) that I wish the fastest fragmentation, since it has always been our first enemy. And how much blood was shed ALL OVER THE WORLD, the soldiers of "Her Majesty" know everything from African savages to domestic liberoids ...

            P.P.S.
            God is not Yermoshka -See a little ...
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. +6
              24 June 2016 11: 02
              I fully support! Faster this under-state would have collapsed along with its notorious community of former colonies, and even better would have pulled these windsor in the ass, it's time to establish a republic there!)
            4. +16
              24 June 2016 11: 11
              Quote: Now we are free
              English Russophobia is ETERNAL. Look where everything r ... o settles on (thieves, killers, perverts, degenerates, traitors) from the Central Committee of the USSR and the Russian Federation



              I completely agree ... You don’t even need to go far for examples in both new and recent history ...

              Being an ally of RI in the Entente, Great Britain did not stop the subversive activities on its territory against RI ... In particular, all the active wanderings of the leader of the world proletariat did not pass London ... And the question is whether the October revolution was purely for German money Russia ...

              Before she had time to complete, Naglia immediately became an ardent enemy of the new state on the territory of the same Russia ...

              However, faced with Hitler's Germany, she again (as in the time of the Entente) entered into an alliance with the USSR, without ceasing to consider him, however, her own enemy ...

              Everyone knows about Churchill's Fulton speech ...

              And then - the long years of the Cold War on the verge of a hot ...

              And with the collapse of the USSR, all the same, a new Russia for Great Britain remained an enemy ...

              And one of the anti-Russian guns in her hands has always been and remains Poland ...

              So - the more Naglia has problems - the more I am happy ... Here I am such an old gall cynic ...
              1. +7
                24 June 2016 11: 48
                Quote: weksha50
                And one of the anti-Russian guns in her hands has always been and remains Poland ...

                Yes! Even during the years of the Second World War, England created heaps of problems for the USSR. This is not only the termination of LEND-LIZ assistance on the Northern Route after the British organized tragedy of the PQ-17 convoy, when Churchill did not spare the lives of English and American sailors in the northern seas, this is the conclusion of the Polish Army Anders from the USSR, when she could help in the fight against the Nazis in our territory. Organization and assistance of the Craiova Army, which created problems for the Soviet Forces. There are many examples, including the Warsaw Uprising of 1944.
              2. 0
                25 June 2016 23: 14
                Quote: weksha50
                Everyone knows about Churchill's Fulton speech ...


                And you forgot to mention the plan of Operation Unthinkable!
                Verily, their vileness is unthinkable, they themselves acknowledge!
              3. The comment was deleted.
            5. +14
              24 June 2016 12: 51
              In fact, nothing terrible for our main enemies is not.
              It’s just that the rats were the first to flee the sinking ship, but almost everyone is interested in drowning it: the states need EU resources, the Germans are tired of pulling flawed countries like Spain, Portugal, Greece, etc.
              Britons are simply afraid for their own skin and I’m sure that there are 100500 factors that we don’t know about.

              And it infuriates that whatever happens in the West, this immediately affects oil. This is generally such nonsense. You come to the store, hit your knee on the counter and bread gets cheaper! Well, where did you see this?
              We must move away from this practice.
              1. 0
                24 June 2016 14: 57
                Do not forget about the refusal to sign the Transatlantic Agreement by Germany and France. Maybe now champagne is drunk not at all in the Kremlin, but across the ocean?
                1. +4
                  24 June 2016 21: 19
                  Do not forget about the refusal to sign the Transatlantic Agreement by Germany and France. Maybe now champagne is drunk not at all in the Kremlin, but across the ocean?


                  Look at the root. Strengthening of the USA on the mainland did not happen, the Trojan horse did not help either, and if so, we take the conic back. The most interesting thing is that in this case there is especially no one to drink champagne. Great Britain will give up all efforts to save Scotland, the Americans will pour all forces into Britain, both material and political. Among EU countries, competition for the same American preferences is emerging. That is, the fate of the EU today is in the hands of the United States. Is it good or bad? The biggest, including material losses, are Germany, is it good or bad? Here are two questions that can be combined into one. Germany will pull this new Reich, under one condition. The condition is simple, an alliance with Russia .....
                  1. +2
                    25 June 2016 01: 47
                    Quote: Asadullah
                    The condition is simple, an alliance with Russia .....

                    Why the hell do we have with their migrant Arabs?
                  2. 0
                    25 June 2016 06: 23
                    Quote: Asadullah
                    Germany will pull this new Reich, on one condition

                    If she ceases to pull the countries of southern Europe, she herself will cope
                    Quote: Asadullah
                    The condition is simple, an alliance with Russia .....

                    Historically, there were no such alliances, except in the war with Napoleon, so if there is no foundation, then there will be no building
              2. -1
                24 June 2016 22: 40
                Only if you do not push oil to everyone left and right!
            6. +4
              24 June 2016 14: 42
              England needed such a result; why do we find out later.
              Or do you really think that the results of the referendum were unknown in advance?
            7. 0
              24 June 2016 22: 33
              You are happy about the collapse of Yeees, and how glad I am to say in a fairy tale
            8. 0
              24 June 2016 22: 36
              Pleased with the collapse of the IEs ???
              Yes, no more than me!
          2. +17
            24 June 2016 10: 24
            Michael McFaul considered the results of the referendum on UK membership in the EU victory of President Vladimir Putin. About this he wrote in his "Twitter".
            V.R.I.O. McFaul in Russia, Mr. Anal, also commented on this event
            1. +11
              24 June 2016 12: 18
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Michael McFaul considered the results of the referendum on UK membership in the EU victory of President Vladimir Putin. About this he wrote in his "Twitter".
              V.R.I.O. McFaul in Russia, Mr. Anal, also commented on this event

              good Well, who doubted that!
              Outside the window, rain and hail. This is Putin's fault!
              The cat left the kittens - Putin is to blame,
              Mistress threw a hare - Guilty, guess!
              Here comes the board The unfortunate goby,
              Our Tanya cries loudly - Nearby Putin, not otherwise!

              The light went out, the fence fell, The car stalled motor,
              Healthy tooth removed Ile climbed into the apartment thief,
              I didn’t like the movie, you came to the city .... but
              Brexit chose Albion - it’s his fault, of course!
              Every democrat knows - Putin is to blame!
              bully drinks
              1. +2
                25 June 2016 01: 50
                Winter has passed, summer has come -
                Thanks to Putin for that!
            2. +1
              25 June 2016 21: 53
              Interestingly, what Petyunya will say, where will the news of Svidomo now - they will just ripen when there are hangers-on, psheks and other "poor relatives" will remain laughing
          3. +1
            25 June 2016 11: 19
            I always wondered why Britain left the pound instead of adopting the euro, now it’s clear that it would be easier and faster to jump off.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +4
          24 June 2016 10: 06
          Quote: Wend
          The referendum is not legally binding,

          Yes but-EU next week will hold the first summit of 27 countries, without the UK.
        4. +7
          24 June 2016 10: 08
          Quote: Wend
          The referendum is not legally binding, that is, the government can independently decide the fate of the country. So is it a victory? Well, the opinion of the people, but who cares.

          Yes, it will be so, they will say that the FSE is garbage, the peasants do not understand anything, it is not for nothing that they drove them all to the EU, the shepherd will not give it! bully
          1. +3
            24 June 2016 18: 13
            Do you really think so?
            The result of the referendum is only partly the opinion of the people. The main winners are Britain’s anti-European elites. And they so simply will not give up their goal.
            And what is the idea, I think, will soon become known.
            And further.
            Britons never did anything just like that or out of stupidity.
            Someone said that the rats run first.
            Yes, the first, but they are fleeing a sinking ship.
            And what kind of ship will we all know.
        5. +1
          24 June 2016 10: 15
          Quote: Wend
          So is it a victory? Well, the opinion of the people, but who are they interested in

          Well, well, it's not democratic!
          And they cannot go crazy about democracy. Well, nothing at all without it.
        6. The comment was deleted.
        7. +3
          24 June 2016 10: 17
          Quote: Wend
          Quote: razmik72
          Long live the GDP !!!

          The referendum is not legally binding, that is, the government can independently decide the fate of the country. So is it a victory? Well, the opinion of the people, but who cares.

          This is an indicator of the degree of democracy. Well, are they democrats who themselves consider themselves democrats and teach the rest of the world of democracy. We will see.
        8. -18
          24 June 2016 10: 35
          Quote: Wend
          Well, the opinion of the people, but who cares.

          Russia does not have to judge everyone.
          1. +5
            24 June 2016 10: 38
            Quote: Al1977
            Quote: Wend
            Well, the opinion of the people, but who cares.

            Russia does not have to judge everyone.

            And I do not judge in Russia. This is your prerogative.
          2. +10
            24 June 2016 10: 58
            Quote: Al1977
            Russia does not have to judge everyone.

            And what about Holland? Remember the results of the Consultative and Corrective Referendum on the Approval of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the European Union?
            And the subsequent statements by politicians that the work on the association agreement will go on as before, because the referendum is not legally binding?
        9. +4
          24 June 2016 10: 51
          So is it a victory?


          Whose victory is it? The pound sank, and the euro? After all, the euro will also not be sweet without shaving. Does the US sit and mourn that the second reserve currency is dying? I don’t think .... They say here that it’s easier for us to break the Europeans individually. Is it more difficult for the states? I don’t remember that the United States gleefully watched Europe unite and introduce the euro. So why are states bad? And is it not their multi-port? recourse
          1. 0
            24 June 2016 14: 47
            Quote: dauria
            So is it a victory?


            Whose victory is it? The pound sank, and the euro? After all, the euro will also not be sweet without shaving. Does the US sit and mourn that the second reserve currency is dying? I don’t think .... They say here that it’s easier for us to break the Europeans individually. Is it more difficult for the states? I don’t remember that the United States gleefully watched Europe unite and introduce the euro. So why are states bad? And is it not their multi-port? recourse

            They will survive, they will live all their lives on oatmeal and corn flakes. Now let our nouveau riches twitch.
          2. 0
            24 June 2016 15: 12
            Quote: dauria
            The pound sank, and the euro

            Drawdown of its currency is an unacceptable luxury for the country. We have some flawed idea of ​​currencies and exchange rates. The strength of a currency is determined not by its relation to another, but by its purchasing power.
            The depreciation of the currency, so ... without reason, is called a currency war. Because it closes the domestic market for external goods and gives an advantage for exporting its own.
          3. 0
            24 June 2016 18: 16
            Trump has already spoken out.
        10. The comment was deleted.
        11. +4
          24 June 2016 12: 45
          Imitating Shakespeare: Should Putin, according to the results of the referendum, congratulate the Queen of England, that’s the question. laughing
          1. +13
            24 June 2016 12: 51
            The British themselves have already congratulated laughing
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. +2
              25 June 2016 08: 38
              A credible Hindu, he then knows the true history of the world! And from what root is it!
            3. 0
              25 June 2016 11: 18
              Vladimir Vladimirovich disguised himself lol
          2. 0
            24 June 2016 14: 52
            Quote: siberalt
            Imitating Shakespeare: Should Putin, according to the results of the referendum, congratulate the Queen of England, that’s the question. laughing

            The whole world is upset around, and you have to
            The trouble was that doomed belay
        12. +3
          24 June 2016 14: 53
          The most cunning are already fleeing the ship and only Ukraine stubbornly climbs into the sinking "European Union" laughing
        13. +1
          24 June 2016 16: 04
          Quote: Wend
          The referendum is not legally binding,

          Well, the result of the vote has no legal force, then I posted in another thread yesterday. But now negotiations will begin between London and Brussels on exit conditions (and maybe absenteeism wink ) Britain from the EU, and here we are, as they say, "we will look".
        14. 0
          24 June 2016 21: 07
          The referendum is not legally binding.


          This is not worn in "democratic" countries, but in the kingdoms it is still worn ...
        15. 0
          25 June 2016 19: 20
          And in a referendum, we took the Crimea. Although of course they probably also do not recognize separation from the EU and NATO will introduce sanctions against Britons)
      2. +5
        24 June 2016 09: 59
        Someone here sprinkled saliva in the morning that the shaves will not go anywhere ... however, what will be the situation now, and is there any "profit" for us? since I am not an "Armageddon" (and he predicted such a result), and I cannot predict what colleagues have thoughts on this topic?
        1. +3
          24 June 2016 10: 02
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          someone here saliva in the morning sprayed that the shaving will not go anywhere ...

          Well, let’s say I. winked And not today, but yesterday Yes and not with saliva, but with port and did not spray, but choked ... sad
          Hello political scientist ... me! drinks
          1. +3
            24 June 2016 10: 10
            [quote = angry partisan] Hi, political scientist, ... me! [/ quote]
            be healthy boyargazpromovets! hi not you alone: ​​[quote] Abbra (1) RU Yesterday, 21:10 PM
            Tomorrow morning we will find out the results of the referendum. It seems to me that supporters of the EU will win. Power will go all the way to prevent separation supporters [/ quote]. avt (3) RU Yesterday, 21:17 p.m. ↑
            [quote] Quote: Abbra
            Tomorrow morning we will find out the results of the referendum. It seems to me that supporters of the EU will win.
            But I don’t think so, because regardless of the shaved results, it’s just that nobody will let go anywhere [/ quote] [quote] Sharky (1) Yesterday, 21:18 p.m.
            Yeah, everything will be presented as a beautiful rivalry on an equal footing. But in the end, those who are for maintaining EU membership will gain the upper hand with a 1% advantage. [/ quote] [quote] Denis Obukhov RU Yesterday, 21:20 p.m. ↑
            Wang 52/48 in favor of the EU [/ quote] [quote] RUS96 (2) RU Yesterday, 22:33 PM ↑
            Yes, not where they will not go .. [/ quote] [quote] Koshak (3) RU Yesterday, 21:25 PM
            Supporters of the EU will "win". And there is nothing to guess. [/ Quote] [quote] sw6513 (3) Yesterday, 21:26
            All this is an empty action, no split of the English is expected [/ quote] [quote] 4ekist (2) RU Yesterday, 21:55
            [quote = Abbra] Tomorrow morning we will find out the results of the referendum. It seems to me that supporters of the EU will win. [/ Quote] smile tired of copying, there were such "wang" dofig ... 6 numbers, no one guessed! wassat
            1. +1
              24 June 2016 11: 16
              Quote: Andrey Yurievich
              It seems to me that supporters of the EU will win. Power will go all the way to prevent separation supporters



              Here the only thing that annoys is the too small advantage of the supporters of the exit ... Only 2% ...

              And democracy ... it is so cunning in the West - it has not just two or three faces, but as many as they need ...
              1. +1
                24 June 2016 11: 25
                Quote: weksha50
                Quote: Andrey Yurievich
                It seems to me that supporters of the EU will win. Power will go all the way to prevent separation supporters

                The quote is not mine.
          2. +1
            24 June 2016 14: 37
            Quote: Angry Guerrilla
            Well let's say

            Quote: Andrey Yurievich
            Hi political scientist

            Hello everyone, in fact, nobody could have predicted that the results are very close to each other and the pendulum could swing here or there.
            There is also a big question of where this will lead - maybe to the collapse of the EU, or maybe to the consolidation of shopping malls in general, England was and was not in the EU maintaining its currency. And the former was quite independent.
            But what can be said unequivocally is that the United States, unlike the European collective farm, is a separate country.
            In general, in connection with this, the strength of the United States will increase, but in general, according to the dollar, this can be seen. Now all the loot of the world will rush to the states.
            1. +2
              24 June 2016 17: 21
              Quote: atalef
              Now all the loot of the world will rush to the states.

              Unfortunately passing through. No one will invest in the real economy of the United States, because it is expensive to conduct real business here. So the money will only make a brief stop in America and, after the Wall Street sharks remove their foams, go to places with cheap labor and relaxed regulation of labor protection, the environment, and so on.
              Well, or invest in luxury real estate, but from this the real economy will also be neither warm nor cold. What is a $ 100M invested in a penthouse? For almost any of those here (Hello, underground billionaires, respond, if there are any!) This is more money than he will see in his entire life. And for the same Wall Street - less than the rounding error of the amount of transactions per day, if not an hour.
            2. -1
              24 June 2016 20: 38
              Quote: atalef
              But what can be said unequivocally is that the United States, unlike the European collective farm, is a separate country.
              In general, in connection with this, the strength of the United States will increase, but in general, according to the dollar, this can be seen. Now all the loot of the world will rush to the states.

              Hi San, I figured it out, and yes, the states are different in "profit" ... the "collective farm" is more difficult to manage, and so ... haaavno question! hi
        2. +12
          24 June 2016 10: 07
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Someone here sprinkled saliva in the morning that the shaves will not go anywhere ... however, what will be the situation now, and is there any "profit" for us? since I am not an "Armageddon" (and he predicted such a result), and I cannot predict what colleagues have thoughts on this topic?

          I have only one thought on this subject so far: drink a glass of Russian vodka for gentlemen in the evening lol The process went wink
          1. +3
            24 June 2016 10: 17
            Quote: Letun
            I have only one thought on this subject: drink a glass of Russian vodka for gentlemen in the evening. The process has begun.

            this is normal! Yes drinks
          2. +12
            24 June 2016 10: 22
            Quote: Letun
            I have only one thought on this subject: drink a glass of Russian vodka for gentlemen in the evening. The process has begun.

            This is in Russian! And I, like a true Tatar, wait first, look around, and then also a glass of vodka laughing
            1. +4
              24 June 2016 10: 39
              Quote: Tatar 174
              This is in Russian! And I, like a true Tatar, wait first, look around, and then also a glass of vodka

              just like my matchmaker! laughing drinks
            2. +4
              24 June 2016 13: 00
              Wrong Tatar! First a glass of vodka, then look around, then another glass, and then wait ... lol
              1. +2
                24 June 2016 14: 48
                Alcoholics, just read that drink right away)
            3. +1
              24 June 2016 14: 56
              Quote: Tartar 174
              Quote: Letun
              I have only one thought on this subject: drink a glass of Russian vodka for gentlemen in the evening. The process has begun.

              This is in Russian! And I, like a true Tatar, wait first, look around, and then also a glass of vodka laughing

              What about uraza? recourse
              1. +1
                24 June 2016 19: 56
                Quote: sgazeev
                What about uraza?

                I am a Soviet Tatar, an internationalist, it’s difficult to re-educate yourself ... And you have a happy Ramadan!
        3. +1
          24 June 2016 10: 18
          And what thoughts, okromya - ACHIEVED!
          They searched for adventures at the opera - and found. They wanted additional preferences, through blackmail - now either Brussels will begin to clamp them, which ultimately will result in an exit from the EU, or they will immediately prepare an exit (in 2 years, now they have no right). It is possible to hold such referenda in other member countries. But I think this referendum introduced an additional split in the EU. The composition of the Union is too heterogeneous with different goals and views among its members, sometimes diametrically opposed. As the saying goes, a union is possible as long as its members have common goals :)
          Well, an alternative option, everyone will be hushed up and will sit like mice :)

          PS Yes, and the Merikos will try their best to support the Union - because this is still a single distribution market, with one it is easier to negotiate / influence about TTIP (Transatlantic Trade Union). If a split occurs, then it will be necessary to influence each country separately, and this is more costly both in time and in attendance ...
          1. +3
            24 June 2016 10: 45
            Quote: Rostovchanin
            now either Brussels will begin to clamp them,

            "Brussel" -naglican? laughing I am begging you! His "clamping" is weak! Who is "Brussel"? - Nobody ... the headquarters of the alliance, that's all. but the Naglich people, they are not leaving NATO, but the EU, will you tell the difference? I mean: the brits, will close the fuck up their borders from the barmaley, will not feed the "single geyropa, and will not obey the marasmic decisions of the" Council of Europe "on any garbage, any quotas stupid ...
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. 0
              24 June 2016 12: 46
              Those. according to your logic, the EU Council has no influence on a member ??? Then what is this alliance !!! ??
              If you entered into an alliance, be so kind as to obey the rules, which, as I understand it, were worked out together.
              Or the position of the World Bank was as follows - while there was a gesheft (economic / political), we were in an alliance + with preferences, but as it blew like a "jerboa" - why do we need such an alliance?
              Who will conduct business with such partners ... It is clear that national interests are first and foremost, but you should not forget about business obligations. Although what am I talking about ... :)
              1. 0
                24 June 2016 15: 02
                Quote: Rostovchanin
                Those. according to your logic, the EU Council has no influence on a member ??? Then what is this alliance !!! ??
                If you entered into an alliance, be so kind as to obey the rules, which, as I understand it, were worked out together.
                Or the position of the World Bank was as follows - while there was a gesheft (economic / political), we were in an alliance + with preferences, but as it blew like a "jerboa" - why do we need such an alliance?
                Who will conduct business with such partners ... It is clear that national interests are first and foremost, but you should not forget about business obligations. Although what am I talking about ... :)

                No matter how much they would like in Brussels, a member of the front desk humbly doesn’t get up, nature is nature. And Borya Ivanov’s son will come to the premiere, we’ll watch. He is very similar to Trump, red, bright personalities. laughing
              2. 0
                24 June 2016 17: 41
                Quote: Rostovchanin
                while there was a gesheft (economic / political), we are in an alliance + with preferences, but as it blew like a "jerboa" - why do we need such an alliance?

                This phrase once reminded me painfully of 1991. Just a couple of years before, we walked along the streets with receivers and enthusiastically listened to the live report from the congress of people's deputies and Mikhail Sveich’s speech for perestroika. And 1991 came - and all that remains is ditties:

                Perestroika mother dear,
                Gorbachev is a father.
                Such a fuck
                I'd rather be an orphan.
        4. The comment was deleted.
        5. +1
          24 June 2016 10: 38
          And who said that they had already left? Is a referendum mandatory? This is how it will come out, so it will come out!
          And predictions are an ungrateful affair (proved by a hydromet center).

          It’s very annoying that they use us as a scarecrow. Like in the movie Home Alone. Adult guys show small fry on a dude with a shovel and tell bloody horror stories supposedly related to him. And this dude with a shovel at the end of the movie Home Alone 1 saves the protagonist.
          We are scared by all countries for different purposes and then we will have to save Europe, and even the whole world. And again, somebody will take advantage of the fruits of our efforts.
          1. +1
            24 June 2016 10: 50
            Quote: Ivan65
            And who said that they had already left?

            "United Kingdom" and announced ... following the results of the referendum.
          2. +14
            24 June 2016 11: 15
            Quote: Ivan65
            And who said that they had already left? Is a referendum mandatory? This is how it will come out, so it will come out!
            And predictions are an ungrateful affair (proved by a hydromet center).

            It’s very annoying that they use us as a scarecrow. Like in the movie Home Alone. Adult guys show small fry on a dude with a shovel and tell bloody horror stories supposedly related to him. And this dude with a shovel at the end of the movie Home Alone 1 saves the protagonist.
            We are scared by all countries for different purposes and then we will have to save Europe, and even the whole world. And again, somebody will take advantage of the fruits of our efforts.

            So they frighten us so that the EU countries would unite in front of an external threat !!! And it won how it went, the "accomplices" are already bursting with fright! Strangled with concern ...
            A new stage will soon begin - races will rush to the Kremlin to restore good relations
        6. 0
          24 June 2016 14: 53
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          Someone here sprinkled saliva in the morning that the shaves will not go anywhere ... however, what will be the situation now, and is there any "profit" for us? since I am not an "Armageddon" (and he predicted such a result), and I cannot predict what colleagues have thoughts on this topic?

          Like Nelson’s conversation with Ushakov. lol
        7. 0
          25 June 2016 06: 26
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          however, what will be the situation now, and is there a "profit" for us?

          In my opinion, no, such events lead to lower oil prices, and this leads to a decrease in the national currency and a rise in the price of gasoline, which in turn pulls the price of all goods up
      3. +17
        24 June 2016 10: 05
        Iron logic! While the chief leader with the whole world was ruining Russia, the GDP alone ruined the EU ... laughing
        1. +4
          24 June 2016 11: 20
          Quote: Finches
          While the chief leader with the whole world was ruining Russia, the GDP alone ruined the EU ...


          This is - just a bell ... More precisely - afroniggeru warning as to their continent's northernmost animal gets ...

          Most likely through Alaska ...
          1. +3
            24 June 2016 11: 58
            Quote: weksha50

            This is - just a bell ... More precisely - afroniggeru warning as to their continent's northernmost animal gets ...

            Most likely through Alaska ...

            Alaska and Texas and the southern states have a desire to secede, but I don’t even want to think about what will happen later, I know one thing that won’t end in good. Do not forget that the United States has nuclear weapons and in whose hands it can fall the collapse of the United States, even scary to imagine.
            1. 0
              24 June 2016 23: 08
              Quote: Amurets
              Alaska and Texas and the southern states have a desire to separate themselves,

              Well you are dreaming laughing Who will let them go?
              Quote: Amurets
              with the collapse of the United States

              It’s really possible that Yellowstone will wake up and begin to restore its order.
      4. The comment was deleted.
      5. +3
        24 June 2016 10: 08
        Quote: razmik72
        .I wonder what they will say now?


        The exit of the third EU economy from the community will upset the established balance of power in the European Union and lead to dominance in the German community, Belgian political scientist Bart Smet said in an interview with TASS.

        "Now the European Union will turn into a German sandbox, since not a single country of the community is now able to oppose Berlin, which has already significantly increased its influence in the European Union during the euro crisis," the expert said.
      6. +15
        24 June 2016 10: 13
        Ukrainians on news forums have "slight" confusion and panic ... Since the training manuals are not yet ready for a new situation, some by inertia continue to rave about a hybrid war, and some call the British traitors and accomplices of the Kremlin, demand to turn off the broadcasting of RT in the EU
      7. +1
        24 June 2016 11: 04
        Further we will call them Great
      8. +7
        24 June 2016 11: 25
        In a referendum in Britain won ... Putin


        Margarita Simonyan: If there is no ale in the tap, then our Emelya drank laughing

        That's right, until the Europeans are not up to Syria ... it is necessary to roll the terrorists into a pancake ...
        Syrian air force resumed air campaign against militants of the IG in the east of Aleppo province


        And we zhezh what?
        Putin hopes India and Pakistan will be adopted at the SCO in 2017


        Smile and wave...
        Last week, Scotland and Northern Ireland announced that they would leave the UK if it leaves the EU.
        1. +22
          24 June 2016 11: 29
          Vladimir Churov secretly leaves the UK via the English Channel. Brexit center assignment completed successfully.


          When the Union collapsed, the liberals rejoiced, because they are for small, comfortable countries. And now they cheated ...
          am
        2. 0
          24 June 2016 21: 05
          They will not go anywhere. Their "return" to the EU will be blocked by at least two EU members (so far) suffering from separatism and division: Spain and Cyprus.
        3. 0
          26 June 2016 20: 10
          And Vladimir Vladimirovich an apartment in Yalta and lieutenant colonel promised ahead of schedule
      9. The comment was deleted.
      10. 0
        24 June 2016 12: 15
        With the price of oil, there’s nothing. So, Sechin said that in Russia, on average, the cost of producing a barrel of oil is 2,1 American candy wrappers. At a price of 50, we go to budget bookmarks for 2016.
      11. +2
        24 June 2016 12: 51
        Quote: razmik72
        But, if a little more serious, the Britons got serious problems at their fifth point.

        Chichas they will start poking slowly in all the holes from all sides - they say it's time to return, the Washington regional committee insists .... and if you are proud the Britons will be stubborn, you will begin difficulties in trading with neighbors and other economic complications, because there is a good cover, Who is the head in this house laughing
      12. +2
        24 June 2016 15: 24
        and here’s the reaction of Putin’s partner:
      13. +1
        24 June 2016 21: 48
        21 Jun. Nicola Sturgen, leader of the Scottish National Party, said that if the UK leaves the European Union, Scotland will hold a second referendum on secession from the United Kingdom.

        all rained down ?! belay
    2. +14
      24 June 2016 09: 55
      As parachutists say - The first one went ...
      Ukrainians ... what are you all the same suckers!
      1. +14
        24 June 2016 09: 58
        Well, according to tradition ... anecdote to the spite of the day:

        After Ukraine’s entry into the EU, two Khom Khokhl talk:
        - Well, shaw, how are you?
        - Yes, this EU crap! I am out of work, my wife washes the floors in Italy, my daughter is a prostitute in France, my son married a German ... And the Muscovites are to blame for everything !!! They said: "do not join the EU."
        After all, they knew, bastards what we would do in spite!
        1. +5
          24 June 2016 11: 24
          Quote: dmitriyruss
          After all, they knew, bastards what we would do in spite!


          Something thought that in the future the EU would consist of Poland, the Baltic states and Ukraine ... And they will continue to undermine the Russian economy ...
          1. +6
            24 June 2016 11: 38
            And they will call this neoplasm the Warsaw Pact.
      2. WKS
        +4
        24 June 2016 10: 19
        Now the second act will begin to blur the majority opinion.
    3. +6
      24 June 2016 09: 55
      She will not leave the European Union, they say again the Kremlin’s hand or something else. The opinion of the people does not mean anything.
      1. +4
        24 June 2016 10: 04
        Quote: Russian
        She will not leave the European Union, they say again the Kremlin’s hand or something else. The opinion of the people does not mean anything.

        ------------------
        The Kremlin is already some kind of six-armed seven-winged. He cares about everything. In general, there is such an English fairy tale about Winnie the Pooh bear, the author is a certain Milne. So there Eeyore's donkey put a burst ball in a pot and said "comes in and out."
        1. +3
          25 June 2016 03: 29
          Goodbye Europe!
    4. +2
      24 June 2016 09: 56
      Glory, glory to the Darkest! (Numerous bonnets fly into the air). laughing
      And whoever wondered how this will affect our life with you? Not everything is as clear as the "daughter of a Crimean officer" said.
      1. +2
        24 June 2016 10: 20
        Quote: vladimirvn
        And whoever wondered how this will affect our life with you? Not everything is as clear as the "daughter of a Crimean officer" said

        how do we depend on the island? to me with my "not started higher", it seems that this is good! Or am I, out of natural stupidity, something I do not understand? request what
        1. 0
          25 June 2016 06: 32
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          But how do we depend on the island?

          As Valentina Matvienko said "For us it was like a bolt from the blue", it turns out that someone is still dependent on events in Britain, capital, real estate, business, children, this (well, except for children) can be lost overnight :-)
      2. +2
        24 June 2016 11: 29
        Quote: vladimirvn
        And whoever wondered how it would affect on ours with you life?


        Who exactly do you mean?
        Big business ? Duma boyars and government-municipal bureaucrats? "Servants of the people", caring for him in various exaggerated parties, existing it is not clear on whose and what money? Or the majority of the population of Russia?

        PS Whiskey disappear from sale? Or bread and potatoes? Here lies the answer as to who and how it will affect ...
        1. +4
          24 June 2016 11: 55
          Quote: weksha50
          Who exactly do you mean?
          Big business ? Duma boyars and government-municipal bureaucrats? "Servants of the people", caring for him in various exaggerated parties, existing it is not clear on whose and what money?

          Why is it not clear? On our folk money!
          Quote: Andrey Yurievich
          But how do we depend on the island?

          The families of our numerous oligarchic officials live on the island, their children study in the universities there, their real estate and stolen loot are there.

          Threat. I personally do not care about Britain, even if tomorrow it completely goes under water, like Atlantis.
          I’m more worried about why a woman died of peritonitis in one of our regional towns, after the abolition of a local clinic and ambulance in a district town, the ambulance simply didn’t manage to arrive from the district center !!!
          We have optimized!
          And we are all about some kind of Britain are, and our people are dying out of the blue. And where do we look for the guilty and who will feed and raise two orphaned children ?? !!!
          1. +2
            24 June 2016 12: 51
            Quote: PHANTOM-AS
            Threat. I personally do not care about Britain, even if tomorrow it completely goes under water, like Atlantis.
            I’m more worried about why a woman died of peritonitis in one of our regional towns, after the abolition of a local clinic and ambulance in a district town, the ambulance simply didn’t manage to arrive from the district center !!!
            We have optimized!
            And we are all about some kind of Britain are, and our people are dying out of the blue. And where do we look for the guilty and who will feed and raise two orphaned children ?? !!!

            bitterly ... but what does the island have to do with it? it’s not the citizens who killed the unfortunate woman, it’s ours. what can I say .. vote for EP. (I share your anger.)
            1. +2
              24 June 2016 14: 10
              Quote: Andrey Yurievich
              (I share your anger.)

              ATP for support.
              Quote: Andrey Yurievich
              Vote for EP

              There is a desire to vote from the machine gun Maxim.
          2. +2
            24 June 2016 13: 53
            Quote: PHANTOM-AS
            our people are dying out of the blue. And where do we look for the guilty and who will feed and raise two orphaned children ?? !!!




            Oooohhhh ... What can I say ???

            Here is an article next to it about toughening the fight against terrorism ... Again, the boyars were portrayed and not fully thought out ...
            But, in connection with the changes and the vague wording, they can now find fault with Phantom-As for veiled calls against the authorities, and according to another article - to attract ALL of us for ... how to correctly say ... For prematurity? For the denunciation of Phantom Asa ???

            And when we say something AGAINST Naglya, then they won’t attract anyone ...

            What a life ... interesting ...
            1. +1
              24 June 2016 14: 34
              Quote: weksha50
              to attract ALL of us for ... how to correctly say ... For prematurity?

              Duc, we are not the 37th year! wink
              Or is it selective? what
              1. 0
                24 June 2016 18: 34
                Quote: PHANTOM-AS
                Or is it selective?



                This must be carefully read between the lines of the law ...
          3. +2
            24 June 2016 19: 27
            Quote: PHANTOM-AS
            our people are dying out of the blue.

            Out of the blue?
            My aunt died in the USSR (where the best medicine was, as they say here) from peritonitis, and not in a regional town, but directly in Moscow.
            With peritonitis, jokes are bad, this is by no means an uneven place.
    5. +5
      24 June 2016 09: 57
      the referendum was initiated by none other than Mr. Cameron himself

      This is called outwitting himself. And rightly so. Now the British can continue to calmly lick one place overseas host, without looking back at the EU.
    6. +10
      24 June 2016 09: 58
      "I am the daughter of a British officer, believe me, everything is not so simple here ....!"
    7. +3
      24 June 2016 09: 59
      Any garbage of them inflates an information occasion. A day earlier, sorry, a year later. Who cares? All Britons do not need duty-free and visa-free space. Scottish exporters only need to drive their oil and their viskar to the common market. They will erect barriers again, try how it will be. Although it is unlikely to be better, and so the country is not cheap.
    8. +13
      24 June 2016 09: 59
      Victory will be when 15 former Soviet republics will again gather in the USSR!

      1. +8
        24 June 2016 10: 07
        Only under the flag of Russia !!!!!!!
        1. +2
          24 June 2016 19: 28
          Quote: Hammer 75
          Only under the flag of Russia !!!!!!!

          That's it.
        2. 0
          25 June 2016 06: 34
          Quote: Hammer 75
          Only under the flag of Russia !!!!!!!

          Then they won’t get together, the red flag was a symbol of the country of the union of republics, not the RSFSR
      2. +5
        24 June 2016 10: 57
        Plus Poland, Finland and other territories that fell away from the Russian Empire! laughing
    9. +4
      24 June 2016 10: 00
      The whole European Union is controlled by Washington (what news to get afire) The British are thinking right (not to be confused with their government !!!)
      1. 0
        24 June 2016 13: 30
        Quote: lozh76
        The whole European Union is controlled by Washington (what news to get afire) The British are thinking right (not to be confused with their government !!!)


        Interestingly, in WWII the main part of the Nazi troops defeated the USSR, the Kwantung army also seems to be like him. And the military bases in Germany and Japan, for some reason, are exclusively American. Why?
    10. +2
      24 June 2016 10: 00
      One of the first to speak was ex-US ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul. According to him, he won on a plebiscite in Britain ... Putin.

      Why only Putin ?! Where is ISIS DPRK and other axes?
      1. 0
        25 June 2016 02: 06
        Quote: BARKAS
        Where is ISIS DPRK and other axes?

        well, the "axis" is now one ...
    11. +2
      24 June 2016 10: 02
      Scotland will hold a second referendum on the issue of secession from the United Kingdom.

      And behind her, and Ireland will vote. Then in France they will begin to procrastinate this topic. If we imagine for a second that the EU will break up, then it is not difficult to predict in what position and state of psychosis the Balts and Poland will get used to living on EU money. Under the leadership of the United States, they tried to tear Russia apart, and now they themselves may find themselves in the back end.
      1. 0
        24 June 2016 11: 27
        After which it will be necessary to buy them, the Balts, BUY (naturally inexpensively) - so that the West never raised the question of occupation, etc. The sale and purchase agreement must be carried out through the old English law firm, an honor of honor.
        Well, and then, as it should have been since ancient times, in Rus- disagreeable at the stable, to get rid of everyone no matter how, who doesn’t like, sell overseas ....
        feel Yes what
        1. 0
          25 June 2016 14: 44
          Peter already bought them. It's like a runaway dog ​​- if you returned, what to pay again?
    12. +7
      24 June 2016 10: 02
      Recently, Western civilization reminds me more and more of a giant psychiatric clinic jam-packed with patients.
      And the main attending physician is the USA. It differs from patients only in that it has the keys to the wards.
      And what do we see? Riot in the clinic?
      1. vmo
        0
        24 June 2016 10: 12
        How exactly said! tongue
      2. -2
        24 June 2016 10: 38
        Quote: hirurg
        Recently, Western civilization reminds me more and more of a giant psychiatric clinic jam-packed with patients.

        When, in which country and how much have you been in recently?
        Or is everything more visible from Muhosk?
        1. 0
          24 June 2016 11: 07
          Well, if St. Petersburg, as you say Mukhosk ...
          And by country, yes, I haven’t been there for a long time, because I have enough communication here, due to my professional activities.
          1. -2
            24 June 2016 12: 48
            Quote: hirurg
            Well, if St. Petersburg, as you say Mukhosk ...
            And by country, yes, I haven’t been there for a long time, because I have enough communication here, due to my professional activities.

            And this was not even a question.
            Europe and America are most criticized by those who have not been there. (If this is not your job, as with Solovyov, who has a house there and rests there, or Dr. Zheleznyak, who sent all the children to Europe to study)
            The psychology is like that. I want to believe that everywhere is worse than yours.
            The more problems a person has, the more he blames everyone else or claims that it’s so bad
            That's the way any person works, What's in St. Petersburg, what's in New York.
            It’s just a little sometimes ... it’s strange to look at people who criticize Mercedes, who ride all their lives on constipation ... But they point to Mercedes car services that are clogged with cars on the lifts. And by this look through the glass, concluding that the Mercedes car is full g.
            1. 0
              28 June 2016 21: 59
              I want to believe that everywhere is worse than yours than yours.
              And, here, just not.
              As we say: "Well, where we are not."
              And, like the Chukchi, I see what I sing.
              If, I see that it is pi..r, then I say that it is a diagnosis.
              And in the West, these are minorities. This is so for the sake of example. And such examples are immeasurable.
              And do not confuse corruption, social injustice and insanity.
              1. 0
                29 June 2016 12: 48
                Quote: hirurg
                And do not confuse corruption, social injustice and insanity.

                Like untouchable people do Boeing and Airbus, Mercedes and iPhones. And reasonable Russians live on 500 euros per month, which is comparable to some sort of Albania, Bulgaria, etc. You can reasonably explain. I personally do not buy Russian household appliances, clothes, cars and much more. You know why, because it’s a complete Mr.
                something like that.
                And the Chukchi, yes, more visible from the plague, the Chukchi will believe for a bottle of vodka, that the Martians live in a neighboring yurt.
                1. 0
                  29 June 2016 20: 45
                  bius | leftcenterright | emoimgcolor | hidequotetranslit
                  Mukhosk .. and the Chukchi from .., but you yourself didn’t think that you are from ..opa looking at the world.
                  Only you think that you are smart, and the rest went out for a walk like that?
                  Are you camping too somewhere?
                  You about Thomas, and you about Yerema, and even about vodka for some reason.
                  Stay with yours. Good luck.

                  Accept Corrections Cancel
                  1. 0
                    29 June 2016 21: 02


        2. +3
          24 June 2016 19: 35
          Quote: Al1977
          When, in which country and how much have you been in recently?

          I am so in France, Finland, Austria, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Germany.
          And responsibly, I’ll say more and more like a madhouse, and all patients have a different diagnosis and most are hopeless.
          1. 0
            27 June 2016 10: 06
            Quote: bk316
            Quote: Al1977
            When, in which country and how much have you been in recently?

            I am so in France, Finland, Austria, Spain, Italy, Switzerland, Germany.
            And responsibly, I’ll say more and more like a madhouse, and all patients have a different diagnosis and most are hopeless.

            As I understand it, Russia is the measure of normality for you. And amid her around a madhouse? And are our people the happiest and fairest?
            You are a deputy with a salary of 450 mp per month, or a patient of a mental hospital, there are no other options.
            I, too, in those countries, in Finland, just not been and it was a great time, I would never trade for a visit to Uryupinsk, Tula and other "ideals of normality", with broken roads, poor people, and boorish staff.
      3. 0
        24 June 2016 10: 43
        Quote: hirurg
        Recently, Western civilization reminds me more and more of a giant psychiatric clinic jam-packed with patients.
        And the main attending physician is the USA. It differs from patients only in that it has the keys to the wards.
        And what do we see? Riot in the clinic?

        IMHO, a little bit wrong: the Chief Physician went out to smoke, and the USA is a psycho who put on a dressing gown, but the doctor will return, possibly with the orderlies ... hi
      4. 0
        24 June 2016 10: 54
        laughing good They are confused, they no longer know how to do it. The British want to put themselves higher and more comfortable as always, but they still haven’t really succeeded.
    13. +3
      24 June 2016 10: 03
      And here Putin. Now the Martians will be hanged on him. They themselves knead their kosher strep, and hang labels on others.
    14. -3
      24 June 2016 10: 04
      Well, well, good advertising for Russia and Putin!
    15. +1
      24 June 2016 10: 05
      All this is nonsense. How the government decides (or how they are allowed to decide it will be so). The referendum was consultative in nature, this is the law of Great Britain. So this vote does not decide anything and it is too early to draw conclusions.
    16. -1
      24 June 2016 10: 07
      The first swallow ...
    17. 0
      24 June 2016 10: 13
      Quote: Good_Taxist
      "I am the daughter of a British officer, believe me, everything is not so simple here ....!"

      You plus colleague!
    18. +2
      24 June 2016 10: 16
      Not Putin is some sort of mage level 80! bewitched half of england wassat
    19. +1
      24 June 2016 10: 18
      but I think this is a game.
      it doesn’t matter for them to leave for several years, if the government decides, and they get out with a little pitchfork, it’s not enough that people voted there, or it will come out on special conditions with a special status, all the more so it will be more difficult for some to control the EU.
    20. +2
      24 June 2016 10: 21
      Judging by the title of the article, Putin and common sense in Europe are becoming synonymous.
    21. 0
      24 June 2016 10: 23
      The fact is that the results of the referendum held have no legal force. The UK government does not have to obey the results of the vote.


      How democratic it is, not to take into account the opinions of more than half of the voters! Role Model.
      1. 0
        24 June 2016 11: 26
        Quote: Arkan
        How democratic it is, not to take into account the opinions of more than half of the voters! Role Model.

        Who says they don't count?
        By the way, if 90% of the population votes, what would they be given a million euros, is it worth considering?
    22. 0
      24 June 2016 10: 24
      The first one went. The next exit Netherlands, Denmark, Italy.
      1. +2
        24 June 2016 10: 33
        And also maybe Greece. And at the entrance are two twins - Turkey and Ukraine.
        1. 0
          24 June 2016 10: 44
          No, Greece will not work, she only lives on eurocredits.
          In the European Union, as in other large entities, there are donor regions (England, Germany, for example) and the poor are subsidized by Greeks.
          It’s profitable for donors to get out of such a union (England), unless it is a manager (Germany), but the Greeks can’t get out of it.
    23. 0
      24 June 2016 10: 24
      Blind people. He opened the Yeltsin Center for you, and you are good to him! Mannerheim opened the board, again, snatching! In all collaborates with the American and again glory to him. Now, the people’s money gathered to teleport again, you’ll be fooling around. The meanness of the current government is that if a meteorite falls on America, it’s the merit of the authorities. And if Russian people die, the Kremlin is not to blame. It would be better to describe the merits of this in the sanctions against our athletes, but yes, yes, the daon is not responsible for this, everything is to blame for Obama.
    24. +1
      24 June 2016 10: 24
      Mr. Cameron himself is to blame for this result! It was not necessary to demand special conditions for the country, to frighten the way out. When setting an ultimatum, one must understand that the enemy may not be afraid, and then what, then what? And then we will talk with each of them separately and about the price of gas, and about its reverse for Ukraine, and about Ukraine itself, and about sanctions, and aunt (frau) we will not forget, but a lot of things will not let you down! So, what u hu
    25. -1
      24 June 2016 10: 29
      They have one thing left for Britain. He will turn to the Council of the Federation of Russia and ask V.V. Putin from them What would he lead their country if he agrees to help them become an independent country. hi
    26. HAM
      0
      24 June 2016 10: 32
      Referendum Results:DAVID CAMERON SUCCESSFULLY JOKED !!
    27. 0
      24 June 2016 10: 33
      Yes figs with them, us something? But how can a newborn girl be called NIKOLA? (Nicola Stargen). I do not understand them.
      1. 0
        24 June 2016 13: 48
        Quote: iliitch
        But how can a newborn girl be called NIKOLA?

        Because all the cheese boron, the British only now realized - how? They just turned off the brain laughing
    28. 0
      24 June 2016 10: 38
      But geyrope is over. They can go strained with NATO. Whoever has swallowed the "unfortunate refugees" most of all now will take the most away ...
      1. 0
        24 June 2016 10: 52
        Germany? They stood there at the very beginning with posters like "We are glad to see you and receive you."
    29. +1
      24 June 2016 10: 47
      Non-Russian separatists laughing
    30. +5
      24 June 2016 10: 49
      How much turbidity in politics.
      It is not true that Putin won. Putin is quite sincerely upset along with the entire government and the economic bloc. The system into which they carefully entered the Russian economy was pumped, and at the same time the achieved economic indicators were staggered. The stability of the country's economy should be ensured by the domestic economy, as much as possible independent of external influence. Yes, I was always angry that the purchasing power of the ruble depended on oil reserves in the United States and the report on American employment. But the upper hand in the economy was taken by those who welded capital on external dependence.
      What the result of the vote says.
      The fact that the British are unhappy with their subordination to external forces,
      they want to preserve their traditions and way of life in the economy.
      The need to comply with EU rules and their policies hits farms and manufacturing enterprises, people do not see the proper effect from the results of their work,
      and buyers do not see on the shelves quality, healthy products and goods.
      The EU was created to facilitate the promotion of goods, to the benefit of their producers.
      Today, the interests of producers are sacrificed to politics, or rather to political intrigues.
      And those who do not produce anything, but play by inflating financial bubbles benefit from this situation.
      What the EU gives is not progress, it is inflating the consumer add-on, a bubble that puts pressure on the real sector of the economy, washing high-quality goods from the market, replacing them with chemicals stuffed with chemicals, undermining the health of consumers, and making people consumers in the pharmaceutical and health services markets .
      And the results of the referendum are a well-deserved slap in the face to those heads of state who, neglecting the vital interests of their citizens, are eager to join the world elite, financial markets, and the opportunity to become super-rich.
      So I ask myself, what would be the fate of a politician in England, if he had said it would be okay if 20 million Britons who did not fit into European integration died out. And Chubais has been in Russia for 25 years, successfully struggling with the extra population in the Russian Federation, leading one after another the important areas of the Russian economy.
      It remains to congratulate the British on democracy, it seems for the British this concept is in reality if the referendum took place. It remains to wait for the official results and subsequent decisions.
      1. +2
        24 June 2016 19: 48
        It seems that you decided to write seriously, unlike most people laughing, then pay attention:
        Quote: olimpiada15
        ruble purchasing power depends on US oil reserves and US employment report
        - the instant course on short instruments does not depend, but the purchasing power is not.
        Quote: olimpiada15
        It is not true that Putin won. Putin is sincerely upset

        There is no contradiction, I won, but I think he doesn't have much joy from this.
        Quote: olimpiada15
        Chubais has been in Russia for 25 years, successfully struggling with the extra population in the Russian Federation, leading one after another the important areas of the Russian economy.

        He does not head the direction of the economy, their ministers head.
        Quote: olimpiada15
        It remains to congratulate the British on democracy, n

        It’s too early to congratulate, when (if) they leave, then congratulations, while the probability is still 50% to 50%. But if they don’t come out then condole.

        The rest I agree.
      2. 0
        25 June 2016 02: 13
        Quote: olimpiada15
        Putin is quite sincerely upset along with the entire government and the economic bloc.

        Shaw, their real estate in Naglia will fall in price and the business will lose money?
      3. 0
        25 June 2016 06: 37
        Quote: olimpiada15
        The fact that the British are unhappy with their subordination to external forces,

        The English people may not have guessed about being subordinate to external forces; they voted against what they saw, namely against the influx of migrants
    31. +2
      24 June 2016 10: 49
      "Today it is a gigantic victory for Putin’s foreign policy goals. Pay tribute to him"...

      Um ... But it seems like the real truth in the assessment ...

      In the UK itself, not everything is okay, not only with EU membership, but also with internal unity (Scotland, Wales) ...
      That is, it threatens not only the beginning of a split in the EU, but also Naglia herself ...

      Marine Le Pen has stepped up ... I think that she was not only fed up with EU membership, but NATO too ...

      Greece, while stopped by blackmail, I think, can also go further in its claims to exit the EU ...

      We will not make any further guesses ...

      Although for me, it would be better if the EU got out of the influence of the United States and peacefully traded, was friends with Russia ...
      Hota, honestly, also, honestly, the meanness of the EU against Russia would hardly have been forgiven by me ...

      So - fall apart ... A fair wind in your back ...
    32. +2
      24 June 2016 10: 53
      And his political career is now really close to sunset... The news has already gone online .. The sunset took place, Cameron resigned ..
    33. +1
      24 June 2016 10: 57
      Yes, the same Ukrainians expelled Britain to make way for themselves.
    34. +2
      24 June 2016 11: 15
      Putin is GOD for them, and for me, the president I respect.
    35. 0
      24 June 2016 11: 29
      This result actually has very positive consequences for Russia - the EU is waiting for the "Domino effect", and England will plunge into a state of instability for a long time, as Scotland and Northern Ireland mostly want to stay in the EU and may again try to secede from England.

      This means that the United States will have to forget about the united Russophobic front formed after the “annexation of Crimea” and save the Englishwoman and the gay Europeans.
      1. 0
        24 June 2016 12: 10
        Quote: Joe Stalin
        This result actually has very positive consequences for Russia.

        It is unlikely that the Lords will take off rubles, our currency, like a street girl, hangs around on the western platforms and it is squeezed by speculators of all stripes .... On the other hand, it makes no sense to invest in Europe, gold will grow of course, but alternative markets are needed. Who are they? Indonesia, Pakistan, Brazil or the like? Also not an option. Bonds at zebras .... But if their EU project collapses before our eyes, then where is the guarantee that tomorrow the buck will not crash against the backdrop of mind-blowing debts? There remains Russia and China, possibly India and Mexico - the rest of the markets are either unsustainably developed (turbulent and risky), or with economies that have reached the ceiling and the benefits of investment are not many (these are primarily Asians Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan. O Canada, Australia, and there is no question.)
    36. 0
      24 June 2016 11: 46
      It turns out that 52% of the British wanted to make Putin happy, it looks like it's time to send "polite people" there to support their own. It is necessary to do something with this non-Britain, again, no democracy, sheer imperialism and autocracy. fellow
    37. 0
      24 June 2016 11: 52
      In a referendum in Britain won ... Putin More precisely, his agents - hello to Abramovich laughing
      Now his demolitionist, Savchenko, is operating in an independent building ....... be able to work with people, as Müller Stirlitz said - I famously recruited you in 10 minutes)?
    38. +3
      24 June 2016 11: 54
      Well, that has responded. When the "foreign strategists" destroyed the USSR, there was a lot of joy. Our former republics reveled in freedom, the happiness of breaking with Russia, although all of Russia supported them, often denying themselves. And in Europe everything is different, there were former independent states in the role of vassals, existing on donations from the European bureaucrats of Brussels, who destroyed the agricultural and industry of these countries. But the people, mainly the older generation, who are able to comprehend life in a united Europe and life in an independent state, come to the conclusion that it is impossible to continue living like this. And in a referendum he decided his fate. Well, what will the Western "hawks" say now about the legally correct decision of the referendum - maybe Crimean will be recognized as legal? Oh, gentlemen? Or is your choice correct and legal, and the decision of the people of Crimea is the will of the Kremlin, which forced the population of Crimea to accept this choice at gunpoint? Well, let's see what happens next? Chain Reaction - Forward!
    39. 0
      24 June 2016 12: 02
      Last year, some predictor said that this year some country in the European Union will cease to exist, I frankly called it, to myself, delirium. I do not believe the predictor, and it’s just nonsense. And then the referendum and the desire of Scotland and Ireland to secede, some kind of Armageddian is direct.
    40. +3
      24 June 2016 12: 07
      I don’t understand why you are all happy? Bicycle Britain has always acted in its own interests. If she left them to her (EU), then soon it will be simply dangerous to be in it.
    41. +1
      24 June 2016 12: 07
      It is interesting.
      It is reported that the British on the eve of the referendum were actively looking for in search engines the answer to the question: is Russia a member of the EU.
    42. 0
      24 June 2016 12: 19
      If there is no water in the tap, it means they drank ...
      In short, Putin is to blame and that's it!
    43. 0
      24 June 2016 12: 37
      But the thing is that the referendum was initiated by none other than Mr. Cameron himself. And the joke was a success laughing He thought that the situation was like with CRIMEA and decided to go in front of Putin, and the southern counties got them all these Poles, Balts, Africans, refugees, just crooks.
    44. +2
      24 June 2016 12: 59
      The theme with the European Union was stirred up by the British. Now uniting Europe under German rule and preparing for war with Russia, they are quietly falling aside. Everything is as usual. The pound of course fell, but apparently the euro will soon fall even more and who will win is clear. England was always ahead of the curve and always won, while they were simple-minded on the mainland with blood and then raked up the consequences of English diplomacy. If England really leaves the EU, this will mean the imminent start of a real war between Europe and Russia.
      Withdrawal from the north of Northern Ireland and Scotland is theoretically possible, but if the vote is the same - in open booths and pencils, then most likely they will remain in the composition, 49% will be for leaving, and 51% against. Democracy is exactly this, an advantage of 1-3% in the direction the rulers want, and if the difference is 87-147%, then this is an unconditional absence of democracy, dictatorship, and savages in general. Ours is so beautiful at manipulating the calculations so far they do not know how, from here and neglect of them.
      1. 0
        26 June 2016 20: 46
        Impossible war. You will see that now France is afraid of Germany and start a conversation to lift the sanctions. Not immediately, but you will see! Now from tomorrow (Monday), swing Bags and elections in Spain? Elections to be redone in Austria (for electoral fraud)? A referendum on constitutional reform in Italy, Renzi will lose and will vote against Europe! Election in the Netherlands and France in 2017? No, you will see. Europe has no power to remain the Organization, it is not possible to make war. The economies of France, Italy and the UK are collapsing due to free-market policies in Europe!
    45. +1
      24 June 2016 13: 00
      So what, the normal ones won the referendum, but there are no people, there are only people whose brains work.
    46. 0
      24 June 2016 13: 15
      He-he-he ... I immediately remember the magnificent TV series and the book "Yes, Mr. Minister":
      Obviously, seeing on my face absolute bewilderment, Sir Humphrey tried to explain his idea in approximately the following way: “For at least the last five centuries, Great Britain has been consistently pursuing the same foreign policy line - to prevent the unification of Europe. To achieve this, we fought together with the Dutch against the Spaniards, with the Germans against the French, with the French and Italians against the Germans, and then with the French against the Germans and Italians.

      In other words, divide and rule. And the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, of course, does not see any reason to abandon the principle, which for several centuries has reliably served the interests of the country.

      Of course, I was aware that it was so, but I sincerely believed that all this was from the realm of history. According to Humphrey, the principle of “divide and conquer” still lies at the heart of our foreign policy. We needed to “blow up” the Common Market, he explained, and for this we had to enter it, since all attempts to destroy it from the outside were unsuccessful. (This refers to the short and fruitless stay of England in the European Free Trade Association, created in 1960. - Ed.) Now, acting from the inside, we can brew such porridge there ... We have already set up the Germans against the French, French against the Italians, Italians against the Dutch. MIDDS in the seventh heaven with happiness. Everything goes as in the good old days.
      1. 0
        26 June 2016 20: 37
        Not a plot. The peoples of Europe in the war for 2500 years. The same people, the same land. This is called "geopolitics." England made all its wars against attempts to make empires in Europe. Against the Spaniards, French, Germans. Two continental wars and both world wars. And then? ... Then the submission of the Germans, without a fight? ... No, that was impossible. Now without France, Holland and Denmark, England they are also afraid of Germany. Italy? Italian political ... rage against Europe and the servants. The pro-Europe propaganda formidable these days is truly unbelievable. but people are angry and incredulous. Only a matter of time, liberal Europe is over.
    47. +1
      24 June 2016 13: 17
      It is good when the main ally of our enemy has problems, let them deal with them.
    48. 0
      24 June 2016 13: 42
      Quote: Scoun
      Quote: Wend
      So is it a victory?

      The old woman may and will remain in the union, but Brussels and some countries will have to "move" and by the way, the British initially kept themselves apart and did not strive to leave their pound sterling in the euro zone.

      HaHaHa, this is both the Ukrainians in the European Union and England outside it. Visibility?
    49. +3
      24 June 2016 13: 48
      The project "united Europe" would be great if it was an initiative exclusively of Europe. But in this case, the American plan is visible. To unite Europe, make the center of control, the country leaders and then have them all, as they say, against Russia and for whatever. What we have now managed to fully observe. Puppet governments, complete lack of independence, imposition of opinions and decisions. All are forced to obey one uncle. Why such a united Europe? Perhaps the reverse process of withdrawal from addiction has already begun, which can be welcomed.
    50. mmk
      0
      24 June 2016 14: 10
      So here!
    51. +4
      24 June 2016 14: 13
      the darkest one is to blame)
    52. -1
      24 June 2016 14: 25
      Long live the hand of Moscow! Our most humane and fair HAND! FSB hybrid operation. Divide et impera! It is easier to come to an agreement with a “sovereign” country. In some ways this ambassador is right. True, parliament can block this very exit. Everything will return to normal.
    53. 0
      24 June 2016 14: 25
      And at seven in the morning I turned on Euronews to see how the “partners” were doing and I couldn’t understand - the sad faces of the presenters, the strain in their voices, the melancholy in their eyes. I even thought that something had been blown up somewhere at first. And then I realized what was going on and laughed for a long time, repeating “yes!” and making obscene gestures to the TV in the style of “bite the crap” :)
    54. +1
      24 June 2016 14: 45
      Quote: Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov refused to comment on his British counterpart’s statement that the results of the Brexit referendum pleased Russian President Vladimir Putin. Lavrov noted that he does not have a medical education. “That’s why I don’t comment on medical cases,” said the head of the diplomatic department (quoted by Interfax).
      And then he said silently: “!” Then everyone remembers. :)
    55. 0
      24 June 2016 14: 57
      Shaved stay shaved. Even when leaving, they try to slam the door louder. am
      "..The head of the (British) foreign policy department Hammond, having actually spat in the face of his own people, in the morning “expressed the hope that Brexit should not weaken the sanctions regime against Russia,” wrote the official representative of the diplomatic department.".....https: //lenta.ru/news/2016/06/24/brexit_whoe
      xit/
    56. 0
      24 June 2016 15: 25
      In light of the above, I order... laughing
    57. +1
      24 June 2016 15: 29
      According to the most recent data, 52 percent of the British voted at the referendum were in favor of secession of the kingdom from the European Union. The turnout was high: 72,1% of voters showed up at the polling stations. The career of Prime Minister Cameron, who spoke in favor of preserving EU membership, can be considered complete. Experts believe that luck has turned away from the politician. But his opponents, including the former Mayor of London B. Johnson, triumph.
      So what follows from this? What happened that was so significant? Or has everyone already forgotten about the referendum in Greece?
      The summit participants will discuss the results of the referendum in Greece, in which the majority of those who voted - 61,31% - opposed the conditions that international creditors presented to the country. The opposite point of view was expressed by 38,69%. Such voting results increased the likelihood of a full-scale default by Greece and its exit from the eurozone. Meanwhile, as Reuters reports, Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis, who had previously accused creditors of terrorism, announced his resignation.

      Why worry so much, we'll wait and see what follows from this.
    58. 3vs
      0
      24 June 2016 16: 39
      We must support Boris Johnson's candidacy for the vacant post! bully
    59. 0
      24 June 2016 16: 40
      Quote: dionis
      Plus Poland, Finland and other territories that fell away from the Russian Empire! laughing

      plus the Kurillas and California (it was the land of Russian merchants).
    60. +4
      24 June 2016 16: 43
      I don’t believe that in a country with centuries of experience in managing “democracy”, such an incident could accidentally happen. The outcome was planned. Otherwise, why was there a referendum at all? Nothing seemed to force him to carry it out. Other countries can do quite well without it. And they don't suffer. As many as 27 pieces. So 2 percent is the “correct” 2 percent. The British needed a purely formal reason to go ashore from this Euro-scow.
      It turns out that the European Union project has become irrelevant in some circles.
    61. 0
      24 June 2016 17: 21
      But it seems to me that someone will make very good money from this. Indeed, according to bookmakers’ forecasts, the probability that the British people will vote to leave the EU is only 15%. Someone could play short on the market knowing the real outcome. And make bets at the same time. Some Soros has gotten up to speed again, and the last one is definitely on topic.
    62. 0
      24 June 2016 18: 08
      Today one person came to our village. So he told me over a glass of tea at the bar. Putin created a special group. So this is them.
    63. 0
      24 June 2016 18: 13
      In a normal society, it is customary to be held accountable for one’s words, but with these people, “freedom of speech” is poured out in all directions.
    64. -1
      24 June 2016 18: 18
      Who lost and how much and in what currency?
      One thing is clear for now: very difficult times have come for migrant workers. Poland, Lithuania and Latvia will suffer. The financial burden of maintaining these allies will increase for Germany and France. While the Britexit mechanism is being created, a lot of things can happen. Europe has begun to move to the right.
    65. +1
      24 June 2016 18: 22
      It’s interesting to read the comments on ukrosites.
    66. 0
      24 June 2016 18: 22
      Again zrada.
    67. +2
      24 June 2016 18: 47
      My personal opinion is that it is not the United States that controls Britain, but rather the opposite. And Britain, with the help of the states, rules the EU. Didn't Britain create the EU? And at the same time, she did not introduce the euro, but kept the pound? This means that from the very beginning the exit was planned at the right moment. So now the EU may crumble. Only these countries, over the years of the EU and mutual sanctions, refugee flows, the increasing presence of American troops, showdowns in the south (Ukraine and Turkey), have become much poorer and weakened. Rule, Britannia? We rejoice here early.
    68. 0
      24 June 2016 19: 15
      Well, Ukraine has new wonderful opportunities to join the EU. True, when only the tribals and Romania and Bulgaria will remain in it, and the rest of the industrialized ones will each run away behind their own fence. And the name will have to be changed slightly - UST, European Union of Poor People
    69. +1
      24 June 2016 19: 52
      didn't read the reviews. I will express my opinion - we benefit from the disunity of Europe. It’s easier to govern the US through EU bureaucrats; we have to negotiate with each individual country. European officials do not care about the interests of each STATE
    70. +1
      24 June 2016 20: 22
      What are we actually happy about? The neighbor's barge developed a leak. Maybe it will drown))
    71. 0
      24 June 2016 20: 31
      Congratulations to England on the Victory!
    72. 0
      24 June 2016 20: 41
      The Lords will veto the result of the referendum and everything: what you ate, what you listened to on the radio. As Britain was in the European Union, it will remain so. Democracy, gentlemen, is what it is.
    73. +2
      24 June 2016 21: 14
      I found a lot of funny things in the comments - thanks to my dear colleagues. But - believe it or not - in this case it was really the PEOPLE of Britain who came to the barricades and DECIDED. Who voted against the exit - London, Edinburgh and Glasgow - that is, the metropolis with a huge percentage of all sorts of trash - creative grant-sucking slackers, inflated Eton graduates and other homosens. But the people took it and voted - in defiance of officialdom and colossal (trust me!) pressure.
      1. 0
        24 June 2016 23: 29
        metropolis with a huge percentage of all kinds of trash
        Northern Irish loyalists and Gibraltarians, too? And in Scotland there doesn’t seem to be a lot of trash. In England, nationalist sentiments of protest are still strong - we've had enough of them all here.
    74. 0
      24 June 2016 21: 49
      Quote: SlavaP
      But the people took it and voted - in defiance of officialdom and colossal (trust me!) pressure.


      It would be better if the British left NATO and unsubscribed from agreements with the United States. And so, for Russia, this does not change anything.
    75. +1
      25 June 2016 01: 06
      I don’t believe in the “defeat” of the British, I don’t! This is another maneuver after the failed seizure of Crimea and the failed war between Ukraine and Russia. This is also a consequence of failed sanctions imposed against our country, and failed EU policies, where not all countries, like Poland, for example, dance to the tune of the British and Americans, and events in the Middle East that did not go according to script.
      But like any maneuver, it will be carried out, and Britain will again take an offensive position together with the United States. That is, either markets will collapse in the near future, or the European Union will be destabilized for a long time (especially Germany and France), and, consequently, sanctions will last indefinitely, but most importantly, the Europeans will be weakened so much that their word will not have weight in international affairs. And then everything will happen again: an attack on Crimea and an attempt to start a new war in Europe, and maybe they’ll come up with something even worse.
      It would be nice to “finish off” the enemy. But, alas, we must adhere to the theory of biodiversity in the world.
    76. -1
      25 June 2016 01: 28
      Damn, why is it that in the most “democratic” countries victory is always achieved in a difficult struggle and the result is always 51-53%? It looks more like fraud or that society is divided into two fronts...or all together)
    77. The comment was deleted.
    78. The comment was deleted.
    79. 0
      25 June 2016 02: 56
      Quote: HAM
      Referendum results: DAVID CAMERON HAD A GOOD JOKE!!

      - I was joking! You can't even joke! The mystery of the third planet.
    80. 0
      25 June 2016 02: 56
      Minus to the author. What did you want to say? - pure chatter. If you have something to say, keep it short and clear, but water and lots of water.
    81. -1
      25 June 2016 04: 10
      There is another interesting question that analysts often ignore or forget about...


      Interesting fellow a whole series of questions regarding the situation that arose in connection with the referendum.

      On what side did the decision of British citizens become superior to Russian internal problems? Why is the Russian economy, which is being helped by such “famous personalities in different periods of the GDP’s reign,” still stalling? In what causal connection did the ruble become tied to the pound?

      And, most importantly, a question initiated by the GDP to the Russian people like: “Do you trust the executive power of the Russian Federation?” or “Do you trust the policy of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation?” which belay would bring “unexpected” results? wassat
    82. 0
      25 June 2016 08: 02
      This is the beginning of the end of the EU!
      In the near future we will watch a parade of referendums... drinks
    83. 0
      25 June 2016 11: 17
      To paraphrase the famous Doctor from “Formula of Love”: Putin is full and the UK is better off. feel
    84. +1
      25 June 2016 14: 47
      I believe that everything is still just beginning. Ukrainian comrades will come to London. They will teach the local punks how to burn tires correctly. They will chant “England is Europe” and “Whoever doesn’t jump is a Muscovite.” The President of Lithuania will come and explain to the people how he (the people) poured water into Putin’s mill. And away we go... There is plenty of hooliganism in England; anyone in doubt should look at the English fans. In addition, as it turned out, Cameron is not inferior to Yanukovych in terms of cowardice and stupidity. So in vain y.g. Experts and political scientists wrinkle their foreheads: it’s better to do something vital. Mr. Johnson, on occasion, will not miss the opportunity to slander both Russia and its President. So, well, it’s not our wedding.
    85. 0
      26 June 2016 10: 43
      “Putin complained about the collapse of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact, so he is glad to see a split in European unity,” the ex-ambassador added.

      And only on the basis of this is the “phenomenal” conclusion made in the title of the article? Is this idiocy, or a failed attempt at licking? Can you remind me who is unsuccessfully promoting some kind of trade partnership? Who benefits from the EU collapsing and then dragging its fragments into this partnership piece by piece? And, by the way, what about the NATO bloc, in response to which the SVD was created? Is this block falling apart or strengthening?
      A collapsed EU is primarily beneficial to the United States, as its main economic competitor, and secondarily beneficial to England. The collapse of the EU is not beneficial for Russia, well, in general, at all. Because the collapsed EU with a weakened economy will buy less energy from its super-energy appendage, even at bargain prices.
    86. 0
      26 June 2016 13: 40
      Quote: sa-ag
      Quote: Asadullah
      Germany will pull this new Reich, on one condition

      If she ceases to pull the countries of southern Europe, she herself will cope
      Quote: Asadullah
      The condition is simple, an alliance with Russia .....

      Historically, there were no such alliances, except in the war with Napoleon, so if there is no foundation, then there will be no building

      Everything has its beginning. According to public opinion polls in Germany, more than 40% are in favor of improving relations with Russia, and 17 percent are against. But our Arab guests-friends are increasing the number of the former and decreasing the number of the latter every day
    87. 0
      27 June 2016 05: 42
      Well, the first rat has rushed off the rotten EU ship, what next...
    88. 0
      27 June 2016 13: 00
      All this from this series.... laughing
      Outside the window, rain and hail. This is Putin's fault!
      The cat left the kittens - Putin is to blame,
      Mistress threw a hare - Guilty, guess!
      Here comes the board The unfortunate goby,
      Our Tanya cries loudly - Nearby Putin, not otherwise!
      The light went out, the fence fell, The car stalled motor,
      Healthy tooth removed Ile climbed into the apartment thief,
      I didn’t like the movie. You’ve come to shit ...
      Any cataclysm has one explanation ...
      Every democrat knows - Putin is to blame!
      Who yesterday in my porch Lift to the ceiling?
      Believe me, comrades, this is Putin’s hand!
      I caught drunk "squirrel" - This is Putin's tricks!
      A pile of shit under the table. This is Putin's fault!
      The toilet is clogged - This is Putin’s order,
      I threw bull-calves there, Merged water - and was such!
      At night, the clothes are stolen, Glasses are breaking in our house.
      Dancing drunk in the yard. This is Putin - a riffraff!
      There is no escape from the villain! Matom writes on the walls
      Broke the bushes in the alley. This is Putin - oh and oh!
      Liberala is wetting the rain - Putin laughs merrily.
      Flooded your cottage? - This is Putin, not otherwise!
      Did you find a thunderstorm along the way? - That hand got the Kremlin.
      Cold, wind, snow - Putin is again to blame.
      Blowing down a hurricane? - This is Putin taking revenge on the rams.
      Storm, tsunami, flood? - This is Putin, no doubt!
      Rainstorm, landslide, cyclone - Of course he is to blame
      Sel, avalanche, rockfall? - Clear: Putin is to blame!
      Tornado, typhoon, earthquake - There is no escape from Putin!
      A crow pecked at the crown? - This is a young friend of the riot police.
      Bees, wasps sting you? - This is Putin's SpetsNaz.
      See this bumblebee? - He is in the service of the Kremlin!
      If you believe in it - It's just paranoia!
    89. 0
      29 June 2016 20: 59
      Mukhosk .. and the Chukchi from .., but you yourself didn’t think that you are from ..opa looking at the world.
      Only you think that you are smart, and the rest went out for a walk like that?
      Are you camping too somewhere?
      You about Thomas, and you about Yerema, and even about vodka for some reason.
      Stay with yours. Good luck.

    "Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

    “Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"