Stoltenberg: Russia ignores agreements with NATO

NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg accused Russia of ignoring the provisions of the NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security, reports RIA News.

“Among other things, the founding act prescribes certain restrictions on the Russian military presence. It, however, was significantly increased, "

Stoltenberg told the Sueddeutsche Zeitung.

He saw the excessive "accumulation" of Russian weapons "in Kaliningrad, in the Crimea, in the region of the Barents, Baltic and Black Seas, as well as in the Eastern Mediterranean." At the same time, the Secretary General did not cite any specific data.

According to him, "Russia has violated the fundamental principle of the act, which is to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states."

Stoltenberg reiterated that "an increase in NATO’s military presence on the eastern flank is planned to prevent possible conflicts." He added that "the deployment of four thousand soldiers in the Baltic States and Poland will be carried out together with other measures, and not in isolation."

Recall, the mentioned Russia-NATO act was signed by the parties in 1997 in Paris. By the way, this document, including the obligation of the alliance not to deploy its troops on the Russian borders on a permanent basis.

Comments

[avvg]

The man confused, or rather, NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are going to our borders, not us.

[Gray brother]

Quote: avvg

A man mixed up, probably NATO is ignoring the agreement with Russia.

I would advise him to look in the mirror, but he most likely does not reflect in it.

[x.andvlad]

Recall that the said Russia-NATO act was signed by the parties in 1997 in Paris. By the way, this document, including contains an obligation of the alliance not to deploy troops on Russian borders on an ongoing basis.
Then let him remember the classic.

[Alena Frolovna]

This anti-NATO fable was written by Olga Sharko in connection with the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, which began on 24 on March 1999. From the former Yugoslavia on the world map now there are only miserable and feeble "fragments" ...

MAN, WOLF and SHEEP

Once upon a time Wolf
started a friendship with a man.
A man was glad: goals a sheep herd!
(And to say that - peace has long been necessary).
All discussed.
And they agreed on
that the Wolf will henceforth only eat weed, -
straighten your habit of tearing sheep -
and predatory all habits will resign,
reliably putting an end to hostility.
Well, Man, - as it should be, -
gave the floor to not arm
yes intrigue the old all - gray - forgive ...
To be so.
And therefore, now instead of the bug
(at the time of her birth and absence)
Wolf herd undertook zealously guard:
to seal the agreement and prove friendship ...
A week has passed.
The wolf, - hungry, - already looked after the sheep ...
But remembering the agreement
that he is no longer a predator and a thief,
decided to cheat, finding fault with something.
Now, having seized the moment when a sheep with a sheep, -
disturbing order and peace,
got into an argument and suddenly started to fight
and bleat loudly, jump and kick
The wolf growled that the herd needed peace
that he de will not tolerate this quarrel
and - in order to stop the sheep's arguments! -
one of the contestants ... bit his throat! ..
A man who sees wolf behavior
calling for wolf conscience immediately
began to explain that patience was needed
and wisdom exponential manifestation;
that the Wolf, they say - is not a judge, but ovpas;
and a friendship agreement means
that each other’s sides aren’t fooling around ...
But the Wolf - in "zeal for the world" in a sheep herd -
so diverged for personal gain
that he didn’t listen to Muzhik at all!
“Fighter for peace” - and therefore right! -
growled his own: they say, let's not allow swara,
eradicate excesses and robbery! -
and ... bit his throat - the second sheep! ..

Patience Muzhik came to an end.
And - in order to protect other sheep -
he grabbed a thick club from the ground
and with it the Wolf departed!
________

It is possible to be friends with a well-fed Wolf.
But only he was starving -
a trick and a scandal starts ...
Well: be beaten to such a wolf!
And the sheep have a lesson here
(Yes, if only he would be him for the future):
those bullies suffered -
what ... an occasion! given.

We have so far only prepared this club: raised from the ground, and then ...
Do not try our Russian patience ...

[vic58]

Well no. Back curator from the USA

[GSH-18]

Stoltenberg: Russia ignores agreements with NATO

Stoltenberg needs to be treated by a psychiatrist.

[79807420129]

"An increase in NATO's military presence on the eastern flank is planned to prevent possible conflicts."

But the club is steroose, it turns out that if NATO expands and increases its presence at our borders, it doesn’t violate anything, but if Russia takes any actions to protect its country, does it violate its obligations? The logic of a self-confident baboon, and self-confidence even before I didn’t bring anyone good. It’s time to be treated for a long time.

[30BIS]

Stoltenberg The pillar he is the pillar. The club is steroos!

[Altona]

Quote: 30BIS

Stoltenberg The pillar he is the pillar. The club is steroos!

----------------------
He is Scandinavian, Norwegian. He has such a peculiarity of thinking, to think and "mirror" his thought.

[Dimontius]

Zhirinovsky said well: "As we shy away at night, no one will even have a desire to think about Russia, let alone the capture of any of our cities."

[hunt1]

Man mixed up - well, here I was not so sure to say it right IT is European-tolerant.

[jjj]

It has been established that almost a third of the "indigenous population" left the Baltic countries. The rest are not eager to defend "European values" with arms in hand. In fact, the West was exposed to a huge area of ​​land. And, if such a task had been set, our troops would have passed through the Baltics quickly enough. The gaps are plugged by NATO troops. But let us note that on a permanent basis, not the most combat-ready units remain. And we, fending off threats from NATO, are deploying three divisions that can fight. Thus, the entire NATO hysteria becomes clear: they understand that they cannot take a bite

[Vend]

Quote: avvg

The man confused, or rather, NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are going to our borders, not us.

Well, it happens that fear may not yet dream of such a thing.

[Observer2014]

avvg RU Today, 10:37 AM New
The man confused, or rather, NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are going to our borders, not us.

Dear how you can print this! This is insidious Russia close to the borders of NATO. Moreover, insolent. Without permission! And the movement of its troops on the territory of Russia! Without coordination with NATO! This is generally incomprehensible. No, it won’t go any further. need to decide!
Either the valerian will end in Europe or Russia will withdraw its army beyond the Urals.
Personally, I choose the mass death from an overdose of valerian of the NATO generals.

[gray smeet]

Well, the increased zombification of its own population on the "evil Russian". preparing for war and preparing public opinion .... still have to clash with the west again.

[DMB_95]

In my opinion, we should defiantly ignore NATO statements and continue to do what makes them most nervous. And to answer shortly: "We are acting on the basis of our national interests." Go through the forest.

[Lelek]

Quote: Observer2014

. Something must be decided!

Precisely "SOMETHING". (IMHO) NATO is a military organization designed to conduct military operations. When the enemy is weak, the alliance boldly enters the war, ruffling an eyebrow (there are a lot of examples, I will not list again). But when the enemy is strong, from which you can get a furious blow, then whining begins: "they were the first to start" and tank rallies near the enemy's borders (unmeasured salaries must be justified, and the expediency of the very existence of the alliance becomes questionable - hence the shout and lamentations) ... So, there can be only two solutions: 1) to dissolve the bloc as unnecessary and harmful, 2) to remove NATO structures from our borders and stop rattling weapons, and sit down at the negotiating table and fulfill the obligations taken during the dissolution of the bloc of Warsaw Pact countries. ... I don't look at other options.

[siberalt]

NATO is a US commercial project. Ah, business, he is a business in Africa.

[Atlant-1164]

how they come .. so they go back .. they know the route .. or Napoleon Bonaparte. Karl Gustav. And Adolf Aloizovich prompt

[volot-voin]

Quote: avvg

NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are moving towards our borders, not us.

And it seems that the borders began to interfere with them.

[Dimontius]

No, yes, you just read that this bastard is broadcasting, right now I'll vomit:
Daniel Bressler | Süddeutsche zeitung
NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg: "Any countermeasure on the part of Russia is unjustified"
In an interview with the German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg accused Russia of not complying with the 1997 Russia-NATO Founding Act on Cooperation and Security.

"Russia does not adhere to the provisions of this document, one of the most important principles of which is respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states. Russia does not respect the territorial integrity of Georgia and Ukraine. Among other things, the Founding Act prescribes certain restrictions on the Russian military presence, but it is also significantly increased." Stoltenberg said.

In turn, the deployment of NATO troops in Eastern Europe is planned, according to the secretary general, in order to prevent possible conflicts. "We are not looking for confrontation with Russia. The Cold War has become history, and we want it to be. What we do is defensive in nature. (...) We send NATO battalions not to provoke conflicts, but to prevent them," Stoltenberg continued. "Strong defense, containment and NATO's decisiveness are the best way to prevent conflicts," the Secretary General said and added that at the same time "NATO is betting on a political dialogue with Russia. Moreover, the tension is great." "If we keep silent with each other, we will not solve any problems," Stoltenberg said.

“We are intensively searching for ways to prevent a new aggravation. But at the same time we have to react to Russia, which has tripled its military spending since 2000, which began to behave much more aggressively and by military force changed European borders. Russia without warning conducts military exercises, including with the participation of more than 10 thousand troops. To this should be added her rhetoric and intimidation of neighbors. In addition, we note the buildup of military forces in Kaliningrad, Crimea, as well as in the territories from the Barents and Baltic Seas, up to to the Black and Eastern Mediterranean Seas. NATO is a defense alliance and inaction would be irresponsible. "

“What we are doing in Eastern Europe is a response to Russia's behavior - there can be no doubt about that,” the source said. “Nobody talked about such a NATO presence on the eastern border until Russia annexed Crimea and destabilized Ukraine. using military force. We react, and in a limited way. The battalions are battalions. But our steps are moderate, responsible and transparent. They are not intended to provoke an escalation. Our front is presence, our methods are transparency. Any countermeasure against Russia's side is unjustified. "

Source: Süddeutsche Zeitung

[meriem1]

Quote: avvg

The man confused, or rather, NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are going to our borders, not us.

They have lost their memory. It’s not even an hour to confuse plus and minus. The agreements on which, for example, the number of troops were negotiated, they did not even ratify !!!!!!!! Although We did it and did it. So why ask Us then? The train left. Let Alexander the Great now be remembered. "Iskander" is named for a reason.

[vic58]

Yes, no! He is a masochist! We need "allies"

[Kasym]

Our expression: "Yes, no" introduces foreigners into a complete stupor when literally translated.
It is high time for Russia to ignore such politicians and "figures". For example, Romania has been forgotten in foreign policy, so now they scratch their turnips, as if they didn’t “multiply” at all. It is the same with Poland (I want to make a reservation right away that I do not mean the peoples, but the leaders of these countries), the Baltic states. And to chop off any economy - these do not represent anything so critical for us, and it is better to sell energy resources to our Eastern partners. And what will happen to them, especially since the euro subsidies are over? And to respond to the calls of these figures is only to add gasoline to the fire and show the importance of these narrow-minded.
I am afraid that in the Baltics (and in Poland, most likely) the local lads will not let the NATO members "roam". A couple of times they will endure their outrage, and on the third they will start to mutuz - there are still enough normal men, not Japan after all. It is interesting to observe how they "give birth" to 4 battalions in all NATO countries, and opposite to the Russian Federation 4 divisions in response. And how do they think with 4 battalions "to close the front along the eastern lines" - comedians, this is not enough even to "cover" the Estonian Tallinn ?! And who then needs this military carnival? And these exercises in the Baltic - it is clear that the Russian Federation will not act according to their scenario - will cut nuclear weapons if someone opens his mouth to Kaliningrad.
GDP so far seems kind, but it seems to me that as soon as you build an alternative in the East (so as not to suffer from a lack of currency) the tone will change. And he (as a scout, officer) will not forget anything - he will remember Russophobia, and persecution in the media, and Olympic organizations in Sochi and Brazil (by the way, our Olympians were also shaken now, a few weeks before the start). I would like to see this scenario, and do not want to forgive - otherwise they would think that everything would get off their hands.

[Lukich]

"Russia violated the fundamental principle of the act, which consists in respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states."

twenty-five again .... well, at least one example of talkers, which country of NATO did we violate sovereignty !!!!

[INVESTOR]

Not a day without Russia, paranoia

[techie]

Russia violated the fundamental principle of the act of respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states

This they mean, obviously, the Baltic countries. According to them, in Russia they sleep and see how to seize the Baltic states "back". Nobody knows, however, why she is to us in her current state. To create a "showcase" again? No, well, nafig. They are still the "showcase" of the EU. Such a visual showcase, which helps to see what you can turn your country into, stupidly following all the orders of "partners" from overseas.

[nickname_826]

Based on their logic, we should completely abolish our armed forces, only then will something cease to bother them!

[dmitriyruss]

NATO behaves differently, it does not ignore the agreements, it does not comply with them, and in the case of missile defense it is not profitable to withdraw from the treaty.

[jetfors_84]

The rams guy got it wrong

[V.ic]

Quote: jetfors_84

Man rams tangled

Are you sure what "man" is?

[rpuropuu]

And Russia does not respect sovereignty and territorial integrity: Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria ... And it constantly provokes teachings on its own territory ...

[Lelek]

Quote: rpuropuu

And Russia does not respect sovereignty and territorial integrity: Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria ...

By the way about Syria - the "Englishwoman" in her long tradition has gone wrong after the statement of the representative of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation to send her "vultures" to Syria - but suddenly either the "falcons" of the Aerospace Forces, or the "beards" will peck.

[sir_obs]

They can participate as prisoners of war, for example.

[Chills]

# DBLBLT Interestingly, the burgs are just as rapturously quoting Shoigu?

[rpuropuu]

Quote: avvg

The man confused, or rather, NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are going to our borders, not us.

Unfortunately in the modern world, one who is right is not heard, but one who shouts louder :-(

[Amurets]

Yes, do they have that, Mass psychosis has begun? Hodges checks are scary. Does Stoltenberg carry any nonsense at all. Has the Baltic fly agaric season begun or did they feed something glucose with the exercises in Poland and the Baltic? From the very beginning, that neither news from NATO, then ravings of a madman.

[Thunderbolt]

Among other things, the fundamental act prescribes certain restrictions on the Russian military presence. However, it has been significantly increased. ”

And the "act" does not prescribe not to meddle in the former social republics, neutral in status and agreements, with their partnership programs? We would not touch the buffer zone and we would not have to plan the placement of the "Ural armor" on our western border. And we would not become Kaliningrad turn into a solid SD.
However, again, this masking rhetoric ... Here is an article through one about the manifestation of concern by NATO generals about the aggressiveness of Russians. It creates a deceptive illusion about the nearness of NATO and even stupid cowardice.
In practice, a configuration of NATO troops concentrating on the border is not favorable for us. Considering that the military mechanism can be launched only after Russia has lost internal stability, the meaning of the West's attack "on all fronts" becomes clear: culture, social sphere, economy and political reformatting of Ukraine and much, much more.

[soroKING]

Quote: avvg

The man confused, or rather, NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are going to our borders, not us.

You don’t remember psaku? she said that gas goes from Europe to Russia

[Alekseits]

She also promised to send a fleet to Belarus.

[newcomer]

deployed, tough, with facts and points from the pact, on the part of our foreign ministry should go for such an impudent rush. we always underestimate the misinformation on the part of these creatures, however their “people” are zombified and hawala everything, they pour it out. we need to fight, defend our point of view, show these zombies that their kings will lead them to mincemeat.

[jPilot]

Oops, I'm calling, I poked my "naughty" finger in the wrong place, of course, "+"

[Nahum]

The height of hypocrisy! Simply fantastic pharisaism ... It's useless to negotiate with these bastards - they will find a way to get around the agreements. Example: they replaced "permanent presence at the borders" with a temporary presence - they regularly rotate the drugs of their military bases ...

[rotmistr60]

prescribes certain restrictions on the Russian military presence

Westerners have an excellent memory of certain restrictions for Russia, but amnesia comes when they talk about the restrictions that were set for NATO and they themselves signed. Well, how to talk with such, and even more so to solve some common global problems? They will deceive, they will throw and once again deceive.

[Siberian]

Another screeching head. Paskuda fulfills money. If you look closely, they will make you the next adviser to Poroshenko.

[Horn]

Well yes. Russia again brazenly placed its borders near NATO ...

[V.ic]

Quote: Horn

Russia again brazenly placed its borders near NATO ...

This once again underlines the historical NOT TOLERANCE of Russia! What is HEALTHY for the Russian, is the DEATH to the German.

[weksha50]

"the founding act prescribes certain restrictions on the Russian military presence. It, however, was significantly increased" ... He saw an excessive "accumulation" of Russian weapons "in Kaliningrad, in the Crimea, in the Barents, Baltic and Black Seasand also in the Eastern Mediterranean. " At the same time, the Secretary General did not provide any specific data "....

What is the "fundamental act" prescribed for Russia to restrict its military presence in their territories ??

And the Mediterranean is not the first century is a zone of interests of Russia ... Stoltenberg, you do not know the story ...

[Wildfox]

The most interesting thing is that the Baltics and Ukraine do not vkurse what nishtyaks have presented to any Poland and Romania. Like a database in someone else's territory. Even if its own infrastructure collides, it will not suffer much, and you can always arrange a "Minsk".
I hope no one thinks that the case will be brought to the 3rd world with the use of nuclear weapons? The fate of the "Gaskets" is not worth it.
It is unclear what the hell is this up to?

[Atlant-1164]

you are not saying something. Mr. NATO.

[BOB044]

He saw the excessive "accumulation" of Russian weapons "in Kaliningrad, in the Crimea, in the region of the Barents, Baltic and Black Seas, as well as in the Eastern Mediterranean." At the same time, the Secretary General did not cite any specific data.

It turns out that Russia needs to lie on its back and spread its legs. Mr. General Secretary of the North Atlantic Alliance Stoltenberg suck. Kaliningrad, Crimea, the Barents, Baltic and Black Seas is our territory. Indicate your mongrel who are serving you. And Russia without you snotty will decide what where and how to place.

[Taygerus]

let him look in the mirror for a start with his clinic, and then gurgles toward Russia, do not we create a dual-use air defense group at their borders

[VNP1958PVN]

There is nothing left for Russia except the Northern Sea Route.

[weksha50]

Quote: VNP1958PVN

There is nothing left for Russia except the Northern Sea Route.

They are already barking that Russia is threatening them (the United States and Canada), intending to locate military bases in Chukotka that will not allow their navies to "sail freely" ...

In fact, Russia should not dominate the Northern Sea Route ...

[Khariton]

We do not ignore it, but for now just warn .... We will ignore it when our tanks rush west on the corpses of your soldiers!

[Ruslan67]

Quote: Chariton

when our tanks over the corpses of your soldiers

Again locked in the head doctor’s office Restless bast

[dchegrinec]

As you know, it’s useless to argue with donkeys. NATO led by the United States is worse than a herd.

[Redfox3k]

But when will this gavkalnik die out? It was apparently specially set for information noise (interference).

[iliya87]

Another horror story Russians are coming !!! Shaigu has already responded to such statements: "On the territory of Russia we want and where we want to move! We do not tell our colleagues from the United States where to place their equipment on their territory and we do not need to specify."

[vmo]

Guys, why explain the morons the truth?

[Algetxnumx]

Quote: siberalt

NATO is a US commercial project. Ah, business, he is a business in Africa.

That's for sure, and as one American actor said, unfortunately he forgot his last name, "America is not a country, America is a business."

[Prisoner]

Wow! They remembered the agreements. Are they really so hot? However, comedians. They demand that we throw a club because they are afraid to stab us with a knife.

[atamankko]

Hypocrisy is a word they cannot understand.

[Victor-M]

Quote: atamankko

Hypocrisy is a word they cannot understand.

For us, hypocrisy is a vice, and for them, dignity.

[dorogvalera]

Well, what do these Russians allow themselves? they are killed and they are protected. it’s not so convenient for us.

[Deniosf]

How to say something in a stranger’s eye they see, but in their log they don’t notice!

[koksalek]

NATO is Alice in the looking glass

[AlexTires]

Stoltenberg is silent that the Western countries themselves have long violated the fundamental agreement on non-expansion of NATO to the east, which, with the connivance of the then leadership of our country, was not clothed in the form of an agreement, satisfied with oral promises and material profits, which we can only suspect ... This is a question as NATO itself complies with all agreements and respects the sovereignty of other states (Yugoslavia, Libya, ay!) In general, a strong Power differs from other states in that it establishes rules and, including when and where to deploy their armed forces.

[imugn]

They signed some commitments, and in response "oral" promises - that's the result: we can be accused of anything, but they are white and fluffy.

[KRIG55]

Well, we don’t raise a panic when an exceptional nation conducts teachings on its prairies. This is exclusively their internal affair. And at home, we have the right to do whatever we please, and everyone is free. If we had a sudden check in Cuba - then yes, be outraged, and so - go to ....

[Ros 56]

the statements of this idiot, this is not arrogance, this is super impudence, and for this in a decent society they simply beat in the impudent face.

[masiya]

A complete ugly and arrogant lie, indicating only that you don’t need to talk about anything with these subhumans, quietly ignore and act according to your own expediency.

[pafegosoff]

Is he the Secretary General or NATO Homosex?
What a prankster!

[amr]

the dog barks, the caravan goes ....

To be honestly tired of VO with these messages for Russia, what should I write every day, what is barking at us?

[pafegosoff]

He simply proves that in Europe there is no one left.
Or maybe throw a grenade there?