Military Review

Stoltenberg: Russia ignores agreements with NATO

73
NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg accused Russia of ignoring the provisions of the NATO-Russia Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security, reports RIA News.



“Among other things, the founding act prescribes certain restrictions on the Russian military presence. It, however, was significantly increased, "
Stoltenberg told the Sueddeutsche Zeitung.

He saw the excessive "accumulation" of Russian weapons "in Kaliningrad, in the Crimea, in the region of the Barents, Baltic and Black Seas, as well as in the Eastern Mediterranean." At the same time, the Secretary General did not cite any specific data.

According to him, "Russia has violated the fundamental principle of the act, which is to respect the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states."

Stoltenberg reiterated that "an increase in NATO’s military presence on the eastern flank is planned to prevent possible conflicts." He added that "the deployment of four thousand soldiers in the Baltic States and Poland will be carried out together with other measures, and not in isolation."

Recall, the mentioned Russia-NATO act was signed by the parties in 1997 in Paris. By the way, this document, including the obligation of the alliance not to deploy its troops on the Russian borders on a permanent basis.
Photos used:
REUTERS
73 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avvg
    avvg 21 June 2016 10: 37
    +27
    The man confused, or rather, NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are going to our borders, not us.
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 21 June 2016 10: 42
      +16
      Quote: avvg
      A man mixed up, probably NATO is ignoring the agreement with Russia.

      I would advise him to look in the mirror, but he most likely does not reflect in it.
      1. x.andvlad
        x.andvlad 21 June 2016 11: 11
        +10
        Recall that the said Russia-NATO act was signed by the parties in 1997 in Paris. By the way, this document, including contains an obligation of the alliance not to deploy troops on Russian borders on an ongoing basis.
        Then let him remember the classic.
        1. Alena Frolovna
          Alena Frolovna 21 June 2016 18: 52
          +5
          This anti-NATO fable was written by Olga Sharko in connection with the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, which began on 24 on March 1999. From the former Yugoslavia on the world map now there are only miserable and feeble "fragments" ...

          MAN, WOLF and SHEEP

          Once upon a time Wolf
          started a friendship with a man.
          A man was glad: goals a sheep herd!
          (And to say that - peace has long been necessary).
          All discussed.
          And they agreed on
          that the Wolf will henceforth only eat weed, -
          straighten your habit of tearing sheep -
          and predatory all habits will resign,
          reliably putting an end to hostility.
          Well, Man, - as it should be, -
          gave the floor to not arm
          yes intrigue the old all - gray - forgive ...
          To be so.
          And therefore, now instead of the bug
          (at the time of her birth and absence)
          Wolf herd undertook zealously guard:
          to seal the agreement and prove friendship ...
          A week has passed.
          The wolf, - hungry, - already looked after the sheep ...
          But remembering the agreement
          that he is no longer a predator and a thief,
          decided to cheat, finding fault with something.
          Now, having seized the moment when a sheep with a sheep, -
          disturbing order and peace,
          got into an argument and suddenly started to fight
          and bleat loudly, jump and kick
          The wolf growled that the herd needed peace
          that he de will not tolerate this quarrel
          and - in order to stop the sheep's arguments! -
          one of the contestants ... bit his throat! ..
          A man who sees wolf behavior
          calling for wolf conscience immediately
          began to explain that patience was needed
          and wisdom exponential manifestation;
          that the Wolf, they say - is not a judge, but ovpas;
          and a friendship agreement means
          that each other’s sides aren’t fooling around ...
          But the Wolf - in "zeal for the world" in a sheep herd -
          so diverged for personal gain
          that he didn’t listen to Muzhik at all!
          “Fighter for peace” - and therefore right! -
          growled his own: they say, let's not allow swara,
          eradicate excesses and robbery! -
          and ... bit his throat - the second sheep! ..

          Patience Muzhik came to an end.
          And - in order to protect other sheep -
          he grabbed a thick club from the ground
          and with it the Wolf departed!

          ________

          It is possible to be friends with a well-fed Wolf.
          But only he was starving -
          a trick and a scandal starts ...
          Well: be beaten to such a wolf!
          And the sheep have a lesson here
          (Yes, if only he would be him for the future):
          those bullies suffered -
          what ... an occasion! given.

          We have so far only prepared this club: raised from the ground, and then ...
          Do not try our Russian patience ...
      2. vic58
        vic58 21 June 2016 12: 08
        +1
        Well no. Back curator from the USA repeat
      3. GSH-18
        GSH-18 21 June 2016 12: 32
        +2
        Stoltenberg: Russia ignores agreements with NATO

        Stoltenberg needs to be treated by a psychiatrist.
    2. 79807420129
      79807420129 21 June 2016 10: 45
      +13
      "An increase in NATO's military presence on the eastern flank is planned to prevent possible conflicts."
      But the club is steroose, it turns out that if NATO expands and increases its presence at our borders, it doesn’t violate anything, but if Russia takes any actions to protect its country, does it violate its obligations? The logic of a self-confident baboon, and self-confidence even before I didn’t bring anyone good. It’s time to be treated for a long time.
      1. 30BIS
        30BIS 21 June 2016 11: 16
        +1
        Stoltenberg The pillar he is the pillar. The club is steroos!
        1. Altona
          Altona 21 June 2016 12: 38
          +1
          Quote: 30BIS
          Stoltenberg The pillar he is the pillar. The club is steroos!

          ----------------------
          He is Scandinavian, Norwegian. He has such a peculiarity of thinking, to think and "mirror" his thought. laughing
    3. Dimontius
      Dimontius 21 June 2016 10: 47
      +6
      Zhirinovsky said well: "As we shy away at night, no one will even have a desire to think about Russia, let alone the capture of any of our cities."
    4. hunt1
      hunt1 21 June 2016 10: 48
      +1
      Man mixed up - well, here I was not so sure to say it right IT is European-tolerant. laughing
    5. jjj
      jjj 21 June 2016 10: 49
      +2
      It has been established that almost a third of the "indigenous population" left the Baltic countries. The rest are not eager to defend "European values" with arms in hand. In fact, the West was exposed to a huge area of ​​land. And, if such a task had been set, our troops would have passed through the Baltics quickly enough. The gaps are plugged by NATO troops. But let us note that on a permanent basis, not the most combat-ready units remain. And we, fending off threats from NATO, are deploying three divisions that can fight. Thus, the entire NATO hysteria becomes clear: they understand that they cannot take a bite
    6. Vend
      Vend 21 June 2016 10: 50
      +10
      Quote: avvg
      The man confused, or rather, NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are going to our borders, not us.

      Well, it happens that fear may not yet dream of such a thing. laughing
    7. Observer2014
      Observer2014 21 June 2016 10: 56
      +5
      avvg hi RU Today, 10:37 AM New
      The man confused, or rather, NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are going to our borders, not us.

      Dear how you can print this! This is insidious Russia close to the borders of NATO. Moreover, insolent. Without permission! And the movement of its troops on the territory of Russia! Without coordination with NATO! This is generally incomprehensible. No, it won’t go any further. need to decide!
      Either the valerian will end in Europe or Russia will withdraw its army beyond the Urals.
      Personally, I choose the mass death from an overdose of valerian of the NATO generals.
      1. gray smeet
        gray smeet 21 June 2016 11: 09
        +2
        Well, the increased zombification of its own population on the "evil Russian". preparing for war and preparing public opinion .... still have to clash with the west again.
      2. DMB_95
        DMB_95 21 June 2016 11: 11
        0
        In my opinion, we should defiantly ignore NATO statements and continue to do what makes them most nervous. And to answer shortly: "We are acting on the basis of our national interests." Go through the forest.
      3. Lelek
        Lelek 21 June 2016 12: 30
        0
        Quote: Observer2014
        . Something must be decided!


        Precisely "SOMETHING". (IMHO) NATO is a military organization designed to conduct military operations. When the enemy is weak, the alliance boldly enters the war, ruffling an eyebrow (there are a lot of examples, I will not list again). But when the enemy is strong, from which you can get a furious blow, then whining begins: "they were the first to start" and tank rallies near the enemy's borders (unmeasured salaries must be justified, and the expediency of the very existence of the alliance becomes questionable - hence the shout and lamentations) ... So, there can be only two solutions: 1) to dissolve the bloc as unnecessary and harmful, 2) to remove NATO structures from our borders and stop rattling weapons, and sit down at the negotiating table and fulfill the obligations taken during the dissolution of the bloc of Warsaw Pact countries. ... I don't look at other options. stop
    8. The comment was deleted.
    9. siberalt
      siberalt 21 June 2016 11: 04
      +1
      NATO is a US commercial project. Ah, business, he is a business in Africa.
    10. Atlant-1164
      Atlant-1164 21 June 2016 11: 09
      +2
      how they come .. so they go back .. they know the route .. or Napoleon Bonaparte. Karl Gustav. And Adolf Aloizovich prompt
    11. volot-voin
      volot-voin 21 June 2016 11: 21
      +1
      Quote: avvg
      NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are moving towards our borders, not us.

      And it seems that the borders began to interfere with them.
      1. Dimontius
        Dimontius 21 June 2016 11: 44
        +3
        No, yes, you just read that this bastard is broadcasting, right now I'll vomit:
        Daniel Bressler | Süddeutsche zeitung
        NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg: "Any countermeasure on the part of Russia is unjustified"
        In an interview with the German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg accused Russia of not complying with the 1997 Russia-NATO Founding Act on Cooperation and Security.

        "Russia does not adhere to the provisions of this document, one of the most important principles of which is respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states. Russia does not respect the territorial integrity of Georgia and Ukraine. Among other things, the Founding Act prescribes certain restrictions on the Russian military presence, but it is also significantly increased." Stoltenberg said.

        In turn, the deployment of NATO troops in Eastern Europe is planned, according to the secretary general, in order to prevent possible conflicts. "We are not looking for confrontation with Russia. The Cold War has become history, and we want it to be. What we do is defensive in nature. (...) We send NATO battalions not to provoke conflicts, but to prevent them," Stoltenberg continued. "Strong defense, containment and NATO's decisiveness are the best way to prevent conflicts," the Secretary General said and added that at the same time "NATO is betting on a political dialogue with Russia. Moreover, the tension is great." "If we keep silent with each other, we will not solve any problems," Stoltenberg said.

        “We are intensively searching for ways to prevent a new aggravation. But at the same time we have to react to Russia, which has tripled its military spending since 2000, which began to behave much more aggressively and by military force changed European borders. Russia without warning conducts military exercises, including with the participation of more than 10 thousand troops. To this should be added her rhetoric and intimidation of neighbors. In addition, we note the buildup of military forces in Kaliningrad, Crimea, as well as in the territories from the Barents and Baltic Seas, up to to the Black and Eastern Mediterranean Seas. NATO is a defense alliance and inaction would be irresponsible. "

        “What we are doing in Eastern Europe is a response to Russia's behavior - there can be no doubt about that,” the source said. “Nobody talked about such a NATO presence on the eastern border until Russia annexed Crimea and destabilized Ukraine. using military force. We react, and in a limited way. The battalions are battalions. But our steps are moderate, responsible and transparent. They are not intended to provoke an escalation. Our front is presence, our methods are transparency. Any countermeasure against Russia's side is unjustified. "

        Source: Süddeutsche Zeitung
    12. meriem1
      meriem1 21 June 2016 12: 05
      0
      Quote: avvg
      The man confused, or rather, NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are going to our borders, not us.

      They have lost their memory. It’s not even an hour to confuse plus and minus. The agreements on which, for example, the number of troops were negotiated, they did not even ratify !!!!!!!! Although We did it and did it. So why ask Us then? The train left. Let Alexander the Great now be remembered. "Iskander" is named for a reason.
    13. vic58
      vic58 21 June 2016 12: 06
      +1
      Yes, no! He is a masochist! We need "allies" repeat
      1. Kasym
        Kasym 21 June 2016 16: 39
        +2
        Our expression: "Yes, no" introduces foreigners into a complete stupor when literally translated. laughing
        It is high time for Russia to ignore such politicians and "figures". For example, Romania has been forgotten in foreign policy, so now they scratch their turnips, as if they didn’t “multiply” at all. It is the same with Poland (I want to make a reservation right away that I do not mean the peoples, but the leaders of these countries), the Baltic states. And to chop off any economy - these do not represent anything so critical for us, and it is better to sell energy resources to our Eastern partners. And what will happen to them, especially since the euro subsidies are over? And to respond to the calls of these figures is only to add gasoline to the fire and show the importance of these narrow-minded.
        I am afraid that in the Baltics (and in Poland, most likely) the local lads will not let the NATO members "roam". A couple of times they will endure their outrage, and on the third they will start to mutuz - there are still enough normal men, not Japan after all. It is interesting to observe how they "give birth" to 4 battalions in all NATO countries, and opposite to the Russian Federation 4 divisions in response. And how do they think with 4 battalions "to close the front along the eastern lines" - comedians, this is not enough even to "cover" the Estonian Tallinn ?! And who then needs this military carnival? And these exercises in the Baltic - it is clear that the Russian Federation will not act according to their scenario - will cut nuclear weapons if someone opens his mouth to Kaliningrad.
        GDP so far seems kind, but it seems to me that as soon as you build an alternative in the East (so as not to suffer from a lack of currency) the tone will change. And he (as a scout, officer) will not forget anything - he will remember Russophobia, and persecution in the media, and Olympic organizations in Sochi and Brazil (by the way, our Olympians were also shaken now, a few weeks before the start). I would like to see this scenario, and do not want to forgive - otherwise they would think that everything would get off their hands. hi
  2. Lukich
    Lukich 21 June 2016 10: 38
    +1
    "Russia violated the fundamental principle of the act, which consists in respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states."
    twenty-five again .... well, at least one example of talkers, which country of NATO did we violate sovereignty !!!!
    1. INVESTOR
      INVESTOR 21 June 2016 10: 39
      0
      Not a day without Russia, paranoia fellow
    2. techie
      techie 21 June 2016 11: 07
      +2
      Russia violated the fundamental principle of the act of respecting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of all states

      This they mean, obviously, the Baltic countries. According to them, in Russia they sleep and see how to seize the Baltic states "back". Nobody knows, however, why she is to us in her current state. To create a "showcase" again? No, well, nafig. They are still the "showcase" of the EU. Such a visual showcase, which helps to see what you can turn your country into, stupidly following all the orders of "partners" from overseas.
  3. nick_826
    nick_826 21 June 2016 10: 38
    +5
    Based on their logic, we should completely abolish our armed forces, only then will something cease to bother them!
  4. dmitriyruss
    dmitriyruss 21 June 2016 10: 40
    0
    NATO behaves differently, it does not ignore the agreements, it does not comply with them, and in the case of missile defense it is not profitable to withdraw from the treaty.
  5. jetfors_84
    jetfors_84 21 June 2016 10: 41
    0
    The rams guy got it wrong
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 21 June 2016 11: 03
      0
      Quote: jetfors_84
      Man rams tangled

      Are you sure what "man" is?
  6. rpuropuu
    rpuropuu 21 June 2016 10: 41
    +8
    And Russia does not respect sovereignty and territorial integrity: Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria ... And it constantly provokes teachings on its own territory ...
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 21 June 2016 12: 41
      0
      Quote: rpuropuu
      And Russia does not respect sovereignty and territorial integrity: Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya, Syria ...


      By the way about Syria - the "Englishwoman" in her long tradition has gone wrong after the statement of the representative of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation to send her "vultures" to Syria - but suddenly either the "falcons" of the Aerospace Forces, or the "beards" will peck. bully
      1. sir_obs
        sir_obs 21 June 2016 14: 16
        0
        They can participate as prisoners of war, for example.
  7. Oznob
    Oznob 21 June 2016 10: 44
    0
    # DBLBLT Interestingly, the burgs are just as rapturously quoting Shoigu?
  8. rpuropuu
    rpuropuu 21 June 2016 10: 44
    +5
    Quote: avvg
    The man confused, or rather, NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are going to our borders, not us.

    Unfortunately in the modern world, one who is right is not heard, but one who shouts louder :-(
  9. Amurets
    Amurets 21 June 2016 10: 44
    +2
    Yes, do they have that, Mass psychosis has begun? Hodges checks are scary. Does Stoltenberg carry any nonsense at all. Has the Baltic fly agaric season begun or did they feed something glucose with the exercises in Poland and the Baltic? From the very beginning, that neither news from NATO, then ravings of a madman.
  10. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 21 June 2016 10: 46
    +2
    Among other things, the fundamental act prescribes certain restrictions on the Russian military presence. However, it has been significantly increased. ”
    And the "act" does not prescribe not to meddle in the former social republics, neutral in status and agreements, with their partnership programs? We would not touch the buffer zone and we would not have to plan the placement of the "Ural armor" on our western border. And we would not become Kaliningrad turn into a solid SD.
    However, again, this masking rhetoric ... Here is an article through one about the manifestation of concern by NATO generals about the aggressiveness of Russians. It creates a deceptive illusion about the nearness of NATO and even stupid cowardice.
    In practice, a configuration of NATO troops concentrating on the border is not favorable for us. Considering that the military mechanism can be launched only after Russia has lost internal stability, the meaning of the West's attack "on all fronts" becomes clear: culture, social sphere, economy and political reformatting of Ukraine and much, much more.
  11. soroKING
    soroKING 21 June 2016 10: 47
    0
    Quote: avvg
    The man confused, or rather, NATO ignores the agreements with Russia, not Russia, and they are going to our borders, not us.

    You don’t remember psaku? she said that gas goes from Europe to Russia
    1. Alekseits
      Alekseits 21 June 2016 10: 50
      +1
      She also promised to send a fleet to Belarus. wink
    2. The comment was deleted.
  12. newcomer
    newcomer 21 June 2016 10: 48
    +2
    deployed, tough, with facts and points from the pact, on the part of our foreign ministry should go for such an impudent rush. we always underestimate the misinformation on the part of these creatures, however their “people” are zombified and hawala everything, they pour it out. we need to fight, defend our point of view, show these zombies that their kings will lead them to mincemeat.
    1. jPilot
      jPilot 21 June 2016 12: 01
      0
      Oops, I'm calling, I poked my "naughty" finger in the wrong place, of course, "+"
  13. Naum
    Naum 21 June 2016 10: 51
    +1
    The height of hypocrisy! Simply fantastic pharisaism ... It's useless to negotiate with these bastards - they will find a way to get around the agreements. Example: they replaced "permanent presence at the borders" with a temporary presence - they regularly rotate the drugs of their military bases ...
  14. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 21 June 2016 10: 52
    +1
    prescribes certain restrictions on the Russian military presence

    Westerners have an excellent memory of certain restrictions for Russia, but amnesia comes when they talk about the restrictions that were set for NATO and they themselves signed. Well, how to talk with such, and even more so to solve some common global problems? They will deceive, they will throw and once again deceive.
  15. Siberian
    Siberian 21 June 2016 10: 53
    +1
    Another screeching head. Paskuda fulfills money. If you look closely, they will make you the next adviser to Poroshenko.
  16. Horn
    Horn 21 June 2016 10: 59
    +5
    Well yes. Russia again brazenly placed its borders near NATO ...
    1. V.ic
      V.ic 21 June 2016 11: 06
      0
      Quote: Horn
      Russia again brazenly placed its borders near NATO ...

      This once again underlines the historical NOT TOLERANCE of Russia! What is HEALTHY for the Russian, is the DEATH to the German.
  17. weksha50
    weksha50 21 June 2016 11: 01
    +3
    "the founding act prescribes certain restrictions on the Russian military presence. It, however, was significantly increased" ... He saw an excessive "accumulation" of Russian weapons "in Kaliningrad, in the Crimea, in the Barents, Baltic and Black Seasand also in the Eastern Mediterranean. " At the same time, the Secretary General did not provide any specific data "....

    What is the "fundamental act" prescribed for Russia to restrict its military presence in their territories ??

    And the Mediterranean is not the first century is a zone of interests of Russia ... Stoltenberg, you do not know the story ...
  18. Wildfox
    Wildfox 21 June 2016 11: 02
    +1
    The most interesting thing is that the Baltics and Ukraine do not vkurse what nishtyaks have presented to any Poland and Romania. Like a database in someone else's territory. Even if its own infrastructure collides, it will not suffer much, and you can always arrange a "Minsk".
    I hope no one thinks that the case will be brought to the 3rd world with the use of nuclear weapons? The fate of the "Gaskets" is not worth it.
    It is unclear what the hell is this up to?
  19. Atlant-1164
    Atlant-1164 21 June 2016 11: 05
    +2
    you are not saying something. Mr. NATO.
  20. BOB044
    BOB044 21 June 2016 11: 08
    0

    He saw the excessive "accumulation" of Russian weapons "in Kaliningrad, in the Crimea, in the region of the Barents, Baltic and Black Seas, as well as in the Eastern Mediterranean." At the same time, the Secretary General did not cite any specific data.
    It turns out that Russia needs to lie on its back and spread its legs. Mr. General Secretary of the North Atlantic Alliance Stoltenberg suck. Kaliningrad, Crimea, the Barents, Baltic and Black Seas is our territory. Indicate your mongrel who are serving you. And Russia without you snotty will decide what where and how to place.
  21. Taygerus
    Taygerus 21 June 2016 11: 14
    0
    let him look in the mirror for a start with his clinic, and then gurgles toward Russia, do not we create a dual-use air defense group at their borders fool
  22. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 21 June 2016 11: 25
    +1
    There is nothing left for Russia except the Northern Sea Route.
    1. weksha50
      weksha50 21 June 2016 16: 10
      0
      Quote: VNP1958PVN
      There is nothing left for Russia except the Northern Sea Route.



      They are already barking that Russia is threatening them (the United States and Canada), intending to locate military bases in Chukotka that will not allow their navies to "sail freely" ...

      In fact, Russia should not dominate the Northern Sea Route ...
  23. Khariton
    Khariton 21 June 2016 11: 26
    +1
    We do not ignore it, but for now just warn .... We will ignore it when our tanks rush west on the corpses of your soldiers! hi
    1. Ruslan67
      Ruslan67 21 June 2016 11: 34
      +1
      Quote: Chariton
      when our tanks over the corpses of your soldiers

      Again locked in the head doctor’s office request Restless bast recourse laughing
  24. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 21 June 2016 11: 27
    0
    As you know, it’s useless to argue with donkeys. NATO led by the United States is worse than a herd.
  25. Redfox3k
    Redfox3k 21 June 2016 11: 28
    0
    But when will this gavkalnik die out? It was apparently specially set for information noise (interference).
  26. iliya87
    iliya87 21 June 2016 11: 32
    0
    Another horror story Russians are coming !!! Shaigu has already responded to such statements: "On the territory of Russia we want and where we want to move! We do not tell our colleagues from the United States where to place their equipment on their territory and we do not need to specify."
  27. vmo
    vmo 21 June 2016 11: 47
    -1
    Guys, why explain the morons the truth?
  28. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx 21 June 2016 11: 52
    0
    Quote: siberalt
    NATO is a US commercial project. Ah, business, he is a business in Africa.

    That's for sure, and as one American actor said, unfortunately he forgot his last name, "America is not a country, America is a business."
  29. Prisoner
    Prisoner 21 June 2016 11: 58
    +1
    Wow! They remembered the agreements. Are they really so hot? However, comedians. They demand that we throw a club because they are afraid to stab us with a knife.
  30. atamankko
    atamankko 21 June 2016 12: 02
    +1
    Hypocrisy is a word they cannot understand.
    1. Victor-M
      Victor-M 21 June 2016 12: 12
      +1
      Quote: atamankko
      Hypocrisy is a word they cannot understand.

      For us, hypocrisy is a vice, and for them, dignity.
  31. dorogvalera
    dorogvalera 21 June 2016 12: 07
    +1
    Well, what do these Russians allow themselves? they are killed and they are protected. it’s not so convenient for us.
  32. Deniosf
    Deniosf 21 June 2016 12: 18
    0
    How to say something in a stranger’s eye they see, but in their log they don’t notice!
  33. koksalek
    koksalek 21 June 2016 12: 29
    0
    NATO is Alice in the looking glass
  34. AlexTires
    AlexTires 21 June 2016 12: 43
    0
    Stoltenberg is silent that the Western countries themselves have long violated the fundamental agreement on non-expansion of NATO to the east, which, with the connivance of the then leadership of our country, was not clothed in the form of an agreement, satisfied with oral promises and material profits, which we can only suspect ... This is a question as NATO itself complies with all agreements and respects the sovereignty of other states (Yugoslavia, Libya, ay!) In general, a strong Power differs from other states in that it establishes rules and, including when and where to deploy their armed forces.
  35. imugn
    imugn 21 June 2016 13: 23
    0
    They signed some commitments, and in response "oral" promises - that's the result: we can be accused of anything, but they are white and fluffy.
  36. KRIG55
    KRIG55 21 June 2016 14: 24
    +1
    Well, we don’t raise a panic when an exceptional nation conducts teachings on its prairies. This is exclusively their internal affair. And at home, we have the right to do whatever we please, and everyone is free. If we had a sudden check in Cuba - then yes, be outraged, and so - go to ....
  37. Ros 56
    Ros 56 21 June 2016 15: 57
    0
    the statements of this idiot, this is not arrogance, this is super impudence, and for this in a decent society they simply beat in the impudent face. hi
  38. masiya
    masiya 21 June 2016 19: 11
    0
    A complete ugly and arrogant lie, indicating only that you don’t need to talk about anything with these subhumans, quietly ignore and act according to your own expediency.
  39. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 22 June 2016 01: 50
    0
    Is he the Secretary General or NATO Homosex?
    What a prankster!
  40. amr
    amr 22 June 2016 16: 08
    0
    the dog barks, the caravan goes ....

    To be honestly tired of VO with these messages for Russia, what should I write every day, what is barking at us?
  41. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 23 June 2016 03: 56
    0
    He simply proves that in Europe there is no one left.
    Or maybe throw a grenade there?