Hodges: surprise checks of troops conducted in the Russian Federation both surprise and frighten

105
The commander of the US ground forces in Europe, Ben Hodges, said that he was constantly surprised and frightened by the speed with which the units of the Russian army move during surprise checks.

Hodges: surprise checks of troops conducted in the Russian Federation both surprise and frighten


“What worries me most is the freedom of movement of Russian troops. Their sudden checks they carry out surprise me personally - whenever they do. So you can understand why it scares me ",
quotes Hodges Bi-bi-si.

The general noted that "Russian troops can move troops and equipment over huge distances very quickly, while NATO does not have this speed."

According to him, in Europe "it is necessary to create a military Schengen zone to give freedom of movement to the alliance forces."

Hodges could not resist from the stamp in the West, saying that Russia "is the only potential threat capable of destroying the United States, Great Britain, Germany or any other country."

Earlier, NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg said that "sudden exercises in Russia violate the mechanisms of military transparency in Europe, undermine transparency and predictability in the region."
105 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +57
    21 June 2016 10: 10
    And the NATO exercises will be amusing. Each has its own functions. laughing
    1. +37
      21 June 2016 10: 13
      We do not need compliments, especially from enemies, do not put to sleep ...
      1. +32
        21 June 2016 10: 38
        This is just some kind of holiday! laughing

        The 173rd Airborne Brigade of the US Army in all its glory.
        1. +14
          21 June 2016 10: 52
          Mastering a new method of bombing armored vehicles.
          1. +1
            21 June 2016 11: 12
            A few more such "exercises" and charges may end ... request
            1. The comment was deleted.
            2. +16
              21 June 2016 13: 02
              Hodges' statement that “the Russian military’s sudden inspections surprise and frighten him” is just Machiavellianism in the hybrid war of the US State Department, the CIA and the Pentagon, which leads NATO itself, against the NATO countries themselves.
              Such statements in geomacavellism are made with the aim of controlling the public consciousness and leadership of the European countries - NATO members - which allows US parasitic elites to control these countries - through NATO - to their advantage, turning them as victim countries into their undivided colonies, and at the same time, also shift his blame for starting the 3rd World War with the USA and the “collective West” to Russia.
              The Russian Federation should more actively repel such Machiavellian attacks on this front of a hybrid war.
              Therefore, the more Hodges will declare that the sudden inspections of troops conducted in Russia allegedly “surprise and frighten” him, the more often and intelligently the Russian side should “shout” him to the whole world: 1) that the US itself is hostile to Russia, 2 ) that the fact of the presence of NATO troops along the borders with Russia is UNSUFFICIENT; 3) that the United States, represented by NATO, is the organizer of the 3rd World War.
              At the same time, it is necessary to more often and intelligibly explain to Europeans and the world community:
              1. that NATO is not a defensive alliance, but an aggressive coalition of countries led by the USA against Russia, created and existing in the interests of enriching only English and American transnational financial world corporations. And that to the genuine protection of the national interests of the European countries - members of the alliance - NATO has nothing to do, but in practice it represents only a real voluntary-forced occupation of these countries as a US colony. That NATO has punitive functions to suppress attempts to get the country out of US external control;
              2. that these countries are just consumables for the Anglo-Saxons of the United States in World War III unleashed by them in Europe for American world domination;
              3. that at the same time, the leaders of the NATO countries are bribed by the US and British intelligence agencies, as they are collaborators whose main task is precisely the surrender and keeping of their country under the external control of the USA (Great Britain and the US Federal Reserve);
              4. that the state European media are also pro-American collaborative and absolutely impossible to trust.
              1. +1
                21 June 2016 18: 22
                Quote: Tatiana
                1. that NATO is not a defensive alliance, but an aggressive coalition of countries led by the USA against Russia, created and existing in the interests of enriching only English and American transnational financial world corporations. And that to the genuine protection of the national interests of the European countries - members of the alliance - NATO has nothing to do, but in practice it represents only a real voluntary-forced occupation of these countries as a US colony. That NATO has punitive functions to suppress attempts to get the country out of US external control;
                2. that these countries are just consumables for the Anglo-Saxons of the United States in World War III unleashed by them in Europe for American world domination;
                3. that at the same time, the leaders of the NATO countries are bribed by the US and British intelligence agencies, as they are collaborators whose main task is precisely the surrender and keeping of their country under the external control of the USA (Great Britain and the US Federal Reserve);
                4. that the state European media are also pro-American collaborative and absolutely impossible to trust.

                ---------------------
                Tanya, if genetic memory does not work, then medicine is usually powerless. True, the Germans are not hopeless, many there understood where such US quirks were leading. This is to make the Germans again a consumable in their economic and military wishes. Even in the United States itself, there are many opponents of "Clintonism"; it is not for nothing that Trump is gaining points on cooling global tensions.
        2. +6
          21 June 2016 11: 05
          I am in shock. Destroy a platoon of equipment for technical reasons in one minute! This is a record.
        3. +17
          21 June 2016 11: 26
          Quote: Thrall
          This is just some kind of holiday!

          ---------------------
          The number of de.bil in NATO troops, starting from the command level, has long exceeded the critical mass. Superimposed on this is the same mass of politicians in the EU and the US. All this already reminds of the popular saying "the more oak trees in the army, the stronger our defense." In general, it makes sense to re-read the immortal Schweik again, the future NATO army is beautifully painted there, and to watch the film adaptations, for 100 years, except for technology, almost nothing has changed.
          Therefore, Hodges, Pavels and Carters give inadequate comments. They will destroy Russia in a week, if they strain, of course. On the contrary, Russia will capture the Baltics in 60 hours, and in parallel will sink the British Isles with a dozen Topols. And while this compote is being cooked in the fjords of Scandinavia, all submarines of the Northern and Baltic Fleets will surface, forcing the Scandinavians to abandon gays and lesbians. The United States will not be able to do anything, Congress will need a week to debate and another two to send "first aid to the allies" in the form of dry rations, condoms and diapers. In general, all the power of the West will be able to mobilize not earlier than a month. And this is the best case. Here the attack on small Iraq entailed three months of enhanced logistics, and this at a time when NATO and the United States were at their peak. The USSR collapsed, and the armies of the West were still combat-ready. In general, something like this. And the funny thing is that NATO will have to call Medvedev to ask the BTA planes to transport their "critical cargo". This is to attack us need our own planes.
          In general, fears are more than enough. laughing
          1. +6
            21 June 2016 12: 04
            That's right, except for 3 months for logistics for the Iraq war.
            They prepared it for a year and assembled 300 thousand groups with all the logistics. For preparation, I mean it’s already prepared plans and the beginning of the transportation of troops and equipment.
            1. 0
              21 June 2016 12: 16
              Quote: Sith Lord
              They prepared it for a year and assembled 300 thousand groups with all the logistics.

              -------------------
              Well here is not the point. I had in mind the final transfer. Just show the scale of the response time if the threat is real.
        4. 0
          21 June 2016 11: 53
          It smells like a Christmas tree am
        5. 0
          21 June 2016 12: 39
          Stoltenberg stated that “sudden exercises in Russia violate the mechanisms of military transparency in Europe, undermine transparency and predictability in the region”

          So we are doing everything right Yes
        6. 0
          21 June 2016 12: 44
          Quote: Thrall
          This is just some kind of holiday! laughing

          Full onl shield! laughing
          I saw this vidos a month ago. Also impressed lol
          The main behind-the-scenes Americans themselves laugh like horses laughing
      2. 0
        21 June 2016 12: 34
        “What concerns me most is the freedom of movement of Russian troops.

        And it personally surprises me how such a cudgel fool takes such a post!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +21
      21 June 2016 10: 13
      Hodges: surprise checks of troops conducted in the Russian Federation both surprise and frighten

      Can this moron hang up the schedule of our checks over the bed? That would not be scared ... wassat
      1. +12
        21 June 2016 10: 24
        Interestingly, there were still generals in NATO who were not afraid of any activity of the Russian Army. At least they would not put on display their cowardice.
        1. +7
          21 June 2016 10: 30
          Quote: DMB_95
          At least they would not put on display their cowardice.

          and dullness
        2. +9
          21 June 2016 11: 00
          Interestingly, there were still generals in NATO who were not afraid of any activity of the Russian Army. At least they would not put on display their cowardice.
          Yes, they are not afraid of anyone and they understand that there is no threat - all this is ostentatious tinsel for the European citizen, a kind of propaganda.
      2. +3
        21 June 2016 10: 32
        Quote: Black
        Hodges: surprise checks of troops conducted in the Russian Federation both surprise and frighten
        Can this moron hang up the schedule of our checks over the bed? That would not be scared ..

        The more these apricots will be afraid, the more they will be respected.
        Those who are not afraid (do not respect) - they wipe their feet
        1. jjj
          +3
          21 June 2016 11: 08
          And by the way, we inform "our Western partners" about such exercises in advance. But they still do not have time to react. And we are sharpening troops for mobility. And this becomes a routine for subunits, units and even formations, including the rear. The extreme exercises also included a human mobilization resource
        2. 0
          21 June 2016 12: 06
          Definitely.
    4. +24
      21 June 2016 10: 16
      What concerns me most is the freedom of movement of Russian troops. Their sudden inspections, which they conduct, personally surprise me - whenever they do this. So you can understand why this scares me. ”

      In general, the Russian army serves for that purpose, to frighten and surprise opponents, and for the Russian people to sleep peacefully.
      1. +4
        21 June 2016 11: 05
        Quote: 79807420129
        What concerns me most is the freedom of movement of Russian troops. Their sudden inspections, which they conduct, personally surprise me - whenever they do this. So you can understand why this scares me. ”

        In general, the Russian army serves for that purpose, to frighten and surprise opponents, and for the Russian people to sleep peacefully.

        So today I saw a couple of "bears" above me, heard their roar, which began to be forgotten, felt some kind of satisfaction, calmness. Maybe they will return them to our airfield? I would like to.
      2. 0
        21 June 2016 15: 01
        yeah, they were more comfortable with the Russian army in the late 90s, early 00s, and now they’re scared ... though all this is a show, sensible people are in NATO, and they really appreciate the capabilities of the bloc and the Russian Federation.
    5. +9
      21 June 2016 10: 18
      Quote: Wend
      And the NATO exercises will be amusing. Each has its own functions. laughing

      Anacondas are called operations from them ..))))) laughing There is a tradition in Russia with the names of military equipment and operations not to scare, but not to be scared! good
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. +5
      21 June 2016 10: 28
      And let NATO try to check whether their chiefs of staff will gather at least for the planned three days. laughing A couple - three of these checks and these chiefs of staff will put on NATO with a large device. laughing
      1. +3
        21 June 2016 10: 51
        Quote: siberalt
        And let NATO try to check whether their chiefs of staff will gather at least for the planned three days. laughing A couple - three of these checks and these chiefs of staff will put on NATO with a large device. laughing

        So far, we have also divorced a lot of pot-bellied and thieving generals ... We are working on this! There is a result and it pleases all the same ... (Serdyukov just does not need to be presented .. the matter is dark ..) hi
        1. 0
          21 June 2016 11: 28
          He’s not a general, but just a very large BOP
      2. 0
        21 June 2016 11: 01
        Sibiralt! 10.28. Or can they tell them the false purpose of the teachings? Like at that time, our troops will be in the city of Washington! laughing And when we are not there at this time, they will happily exhale, we defeated the Russians. They were scared of us! So to speak, we support them a little morally. True, they can accuse us of insidious deception. They promised and did not. Demand moral compensation. We again promise to come to them. And so on until they relax. wassat
    8. 0
      21 June 2016 10: 56
      Well, imagine the Estonian Rapid Response Battalion))) (B-B-R-E ... that's the name of <Ichthyandra> laughing) hi
    9. 0
      21 June 2016 11: 59
      laughing Who studied what.
    10. 0
      21 June 2016 12: 37
      According to him, in Europe “it is necessary to create a military Schengen zone in order to give freedom of movement to the troops of the alliance”

      Dreaming is not bad!
    11. 0
      21 June 2016 15: 24
      Hodges: surprise checks of troops conducted in the Russian Federation both surprise and frighten

      Foreign phobias are not our problem. And do not shift this problem from a sore head to a healthy one.
    12. +1
      21 June 2016 20: 53
      Quote: Wend
      And the NATO exercises will make laugh ....

      But I'm not. Bravado doesn't make me happy.
      Tomorrow, June 22, will be the anniversary of the beginning of the Great Patriotic War. It so happened that today we talked with my granddaughter about the book by B. Vasiliev "Not on the lists" about the defense of the Brest Fortress. They remembered her great-grandfathers, and those who did not return from the war, and those who came victorious. We talked about the grief that war brought.
      And, here is the fact that the exercises in our army are constantly going on and gives us hope that this war will not happen again on our land.
  2. +7
    21 June 2016 10: 10
    Yes do not give a shit about them and fall asleep with roses! Wherever we want in the territory of the Russian Federation, there we conduct exercises! And when we want!
    1. 0
      21 June 2016 12: 23
      Her major, you are right: in my "house", when I want and where I want to jump, and on neighbors from the next street I follow ... Recently, someone from their top announced that he was amused by the sudden checks arranged by us. And now they are scared. Gentlemen, decide what scares you and what makes you laugh. However, there is an option that the "guys from the next street" are terrible pacifists and are afraid of a shot, but they also shoot. I do not know
  3. +7
    21 June 2016 10: 10
    What a shy commander ... Ilyich's testament ("To study military affairs in a real way.") I have never heard of.

    The army is not needed for the parade.
    1. +2
      21 June 2016 10: 38
      I agree, but at the parade our same move well - I like it. love
  4. +4
    21 June 2016 10: 11
    Russians harness for a long time, but drive fast ...! Do you know such gentlemen or have you forgotten it already?
  5. +6
    21 June 2016 10: 11
    So you can understand why it scares me

    What are the "generals" in NATO. They are probably more honorable to piss on.
  6. +9
    21 June 2016 10: 14
    his constantly amazes and scares the speed with which the units of the Russian army move during surprise inspections.

    Oops! Are systematic NATO exercises near our borders normal and should not lead to sad thoughts? Do the exercises and inspections of the Russian army on its territory cause any negative emotions among NATO representatives? "Democratizers", it is time to know the measure, Russia also has a lot of patience. Maybe we need to really roar towards the Baltics and Poland so that NATO's brains fall into place?
    1. +3
      21 June 2016 10: 34
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Is NATO's systematic exercise at our borders a normal phenomenon and should not inspire sad thoughts? And the exercises and tests of the Russian army in its territory cause some negative emotions among NATO representatives?

      so they seem to walk on foot, and we move on technology. so they’re afraid that they won’t rub their eyes, and we’re already cooling them on the ass with a belt
      1. +2
        21 June 2016 10: 59
        But why. Here in Europe on armored vehicles swept. The other day in the Baltic States, the cavalry (tank) unit of the United States went. Another thing is that neither NATO, nor the United States alone is yet able to deploy a mass of troops with equipment over long distances. And we can. And this is a big bone in the throat of the chief bourgeois.
      2. +1
        21 June 2016 11: 23
        AGA also pleased me: "I am most worried about the freedom of movement of Russian troops." belay wassat in NAGLETS. Maybe we should ask you where and when to move around YOUR territory.
    2. +1
      21 June 2016 11: 00
      Russian troops can move troops and equipment over huge distances very quickly, while NATO does not have such speed

      I’ll tell you a secret - Russian troops are moving through their territory. Yes
      NATO, do not poke into a foreign land. angry
    3. 0
      21 June 2016 12: 03
      Quote: rotmistr60
      Maybe we need to really roar towards the Baltic states and Polandso that NATO's brains fall into place?



      Again we will be accused of increasing the flow of refugees to Western Europe ...

      PS Hmm ... But - the territory will be cleared ...
  7. +4
    21 June 2016 10: 14
    He seems to be a smart person, but there is the same: “Hodges could not resist the cliché common in the West, saying that Russia“ is the only potential threat capable of destroying the United States, Great Britain, Germany or any other country. ”>> That you are all in Do you look in the same hole? There is no threat.
  8. +5
    21 June 2016 10: 15
    Better not be surprised, but just be scared.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. +5
    21 June 2016 10: 22
    But about the military Schengen zone, it is strong !! The movement of NATO troops without coordination with the local governments of Europe ... that is, a single occupied zone with the elevation of this to the rank of law.
  11. +3
    21 June 2016 10: 23
    Earlier, NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg said that "sudden exercises in Russia violate the mechanisms of military transparency in Europe, undermine transparency and predictability in the region."
    It’s just that NATO has not yet encountered the Russian Armed Forces in a direct clash, if this happens, NATO will suffer significant losses and forever lose its image as an EU defender! Therefore, NATO is greatly frightened by the consequences of the continued existence of the entire bloc!
  12. +3
    21 June 2016 10: 23
    Schengen zone for military equipment in today's Europe ...... ha :)

    Two thousand and sixteenth mother of his year .... humanity doesn’t learn anything!
    1. 0
      21 June 2016 11: 53
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Schengen zone for military equipment in today's Europe ...... ha :)

      Two thousand and sixteenth mother of his year .... humanity doesn’t learn anything!

      And so for each piece of equipment you have to apply for a visa. How much time and paper is necessary?
    2. 0
      21 June 2016 12: 06
      Quote: DEZINTO
      Schengen zone for military equipment in today's Europe ...... ha:)


      Hodges just did not think that Russia could its create a free visa for all of Europe ...

      PS It’s a pity that we didn’t do this in the 45th ...
  13. +1
    21 June 2016 10: 23
    Nevertheless, the note should not be underestimated, the snake still hasn’t run out of poison, well, they don’t give a damn about the fright from the high belfry, even if they are awakened and described. and they should be ready for anything at any time hi
  14. +2
    21 June 2016 10: 23
    Baltic States in 60 hours, say?
    Apparently, sailors will come to the joint meeting of NATO and the European Union on the topic "What plans do we have after the start of the war" and say "tie up, our guard is tired."
    1. -1
      21 June 2016 12: 37
      Ger lieutenant colonel deigned to remember Zheleznyak? Interestingly, the forum users will be able to remember: who is Zheleznyak and in which film the phrase sounded
  15. +2
    21 June 2016 10: 24
    The general noted that “Russian troops can move troops and equipment over great distances very quickly ...

    Missiles fly even faster and through a puddle too. Remember that, Benny!
    1. 0
      21 June 2016 10: 34
      Quote: Karas
      Remember that, Benny!


      Whatever Benya is, there must be some kind of pride ... rock, drunk (Tsar-Boriska) or homosexual
  16. +11
    21 June 2016 10: 25
    May appoint Shoigu coach of our team what Then will these clowns learn to quickly move around the field and suddenly find themselves at the gates of others?
    1. +3
      21 June 2016 10: 48
      good Yesterday I also thought about this! Championship is coming!
      But it’s too early to change the defense for football! smile
      Frightened generals are more comfortable with us than frightened fans!
    2. +2
      21 June 2016 11: 27
      good drinks there would be an opportunity to further instructed.
  17. +6
    21 June 2016 10: 25
    Hodges: the sudden military inspections conducted in the Russian Federation both surprise and frighten - do not be afraid of Hodges. a soldier will not offend a child.
  18. +6
    21 June 2016 10: 27
    these words are not praise of the Russian army, but a horror story for internal use. the warriors are knocking out an increase in the budget of the us and countries of NATO. in order to impose Russia along its borders with its troops like a wolf in a hole. it is clear that despite the high maneuverability and moral-volitional qualities of our Armed Forces, in the war without the use of nuclear weapons we will yield. our leadership understands this, so the doctrine spells the possibility of using nuclear weapons.
    1. 0
      21 June 2016 10: 57
      I suspect that exercises for the use of nuclear weapons are not less intensive, only, for obvious reasons, they are not advertised ...
      To fight in full program with NATO conventional means, I think there are no fools! True, the coin has a flip side - in spite of the military power of the bloc, in a non-nuclear war with Russia it does not shine to meet its norms of losses and stockpiles of weapons.
      IMHO
    2. 0
      21 June 2016 12: 42
      Excuse me, Ger Oberst, but you "didn't discover America", and therefore we need to train more, so God forbid ...
  19. +1
    21 June 2016 10: 27
    According to him, in Europe "it is necessary to create a military Schengen zone in order to give freedom to the movement of the alliance forces."
  20. +7
    21 June 2016 10: 28
    "troop checks are both surprising and frightening"
    And if they have something to fight with us, either on schedule or on a schedule, they have gathered. I can imagine this picture: 07-00 battle until 11-00 then afternoon tea, from 12-00 and until lunch artillery preparation, after lunch quiet time, etc., just like Baron Munchausen’s. The morons are over.
  21. +5
    21 June 2016 10: 29
    The creatures should not frighten you, but retaliation for the atrocities that you committed in Serbia, Iraq, Libya, Syria and other regions.
    am
  22. +3
    21 June 2016 10: 29
    But for me, NATO will never have the same speed of reaction and speed of transfer of troops. There, every country wants to get something out of it. And then, even within the bloc, everyone has their own opinion on any issue. And then I remember the saying that meetings save minutes and lose hours. And it is very difficult for me to imagine the mechanism of NATO's work in the event of a real war with a strong country. Let everyone think for themselves, and the motto "together we are strong" will deteriorate just like the air in the epicenter of an explosion. Although all these statements of mattress generals always have the same context and appeal, and we all know it.
  23. +2
    21 June 2016 10: 31
    That's how they get loot from geyrops, mattresses ...
  24. 0
    21 June 2016 10: 36
    And if you admit that ....
    .... that Russia "is the only potential threat capable of destroying the United States, Britain, Germany or any other country."
    - then they stuffed their beaks "in a mitten" and on their nashests "according to priorities" ...
  25. +1
    21 June 2016 10: 38
    Hodges correctly says that if the American army has mobile units and means for deploying heavy weapons, then the European armies do not have mobile corps capable of operating in harmony, in a single plan. army.
    Hence, we are talking about 3 days during which NATO troops must be able to concentrate on their eastern border, and their headquarters must work in a single information space, the teams must pass correctly. And this is not so easy, given the heterogeneity of the bloc members (and most importantly, their so-called . "special partners" in Europe.
    In addition, in Europe it is difficult to reassign the transport structure in peacetime (for commercial and bureaucratic reasons) .We are much easier with us --- Comrade Putin pressed the button and the BTA engines roared, rolled military trains under the accordion smile
  26. +2
    21 June 2016 10: 39
    fast movement ... we gradually master teleportation bully
  27. +2
    21 June 2016 10: 41
    We are at home, and NATO is practically the occupiers ...
  28. +2
    21 June 2016 10: 41
    Yes, Russia can destroy any country. but it doesn’t. but NATO is doing this successfully. it turns out again from a sore head to a healthy fell.
  29. +1
    21 June 2016 10: 42
    What they are taught in academies there, Suvorov methods are not known to him ... we are in Russia, for some reason we consider this normal.
  30. 0
    21 June 2016 10: 55
    In modern military maneuvers, the one who has the most developed logistics wins and we naturally do not lag behind the armaments, but the situation with logistics is better and, as they say, if everything goes on like this, there will still be roofing felts ... am
  31. 0
    21 June 2016 10: 56
    Quote: Wend
    And the NATO exercises will be amusing. Each has its own functions. laughing

    Especially a parachute-free technique
  32. 0
    21 June 2016 10: 56
    “We need to create a military Schengen zone in order to give freedom of movement to the troops of the alliance”
    This is the key moment of all scarecrows and chants on their part.
  33. 0
    21 June 2016 11: 07
    So everything is done correctly by the Russian brothers !!! good
  34. 0
    21 June 2016 11: 13
    the main meaning of the phrase: Russia "is the only potential threat capable of destroying the United States, Britain, Germany or any other country."
    And the bottom line is that the only country in the world that is capable, ready and actively destroying other states is the United States. It is from this thought that all these "horror stories" about Russia are called to divert.
  35. 0
    21 June 2016 11: 13
    Hodges: surprise checks of troops conducted in the Russian Federation both surprise and frighten
    That gentlemen from NATO begins to weaken you, the bear disease takes. Do not write, the soldier will not hurt the child.
  36. 0
    21 June 2016 11: 14
    Fear with ,,, ki
  37. 0
    21 June 2016 11: 24
    The news about the release of the Canadian intelligence report on Ukraine’s media security was presented as news that “Russia is preparing for a big war.” This is the propaganda maximum that we managed to squeeze out of a study that was extremely disappointing for Ukraine and the West. And thus surprisingly reasonable.

    http://vz.ru/politics/2016/6/21/816962.html
  38. +1
    21 June 2016 11: 25
    why create a Schengen military zone, it is easier to deploy Russian troops in Europe)
    1. 0
      21 June 2016 12: 13
      Quote: AlexSam
      why create a Schengen military zone, it is easier to deploy Russian troops in Europe)



      We don’t have enough troops or money ...

      Better to bring in troops - to plant a pro-Russian government - to present the opposition with convincing arguments about all-round obedience - to withdraw the troops and ... and "trade peacefully with each other" ...
  39. +2
    21 June 2016 11: 32
    Keeping their diapers constantly full is our main concern!
  40. 0
    21 June 2016 11: 32
    Quote: Strong point
    Mastering a new method of bombing armored vehicles.

    No. Spare parts for the remaining mined-used.
  41. +1
    21 June 2016 11: 48
    on our territory, at least every day we have the right to conduct training and various tests of combat readiness of all military units of the RF Armed Forces without exception, and NATO is not instructed here ...
  42. +2
    21 June 2016 11: 57
    "Russia “is the only potential threat capable of destroying the United States, Britain, Germany or any other country"" ...

    Hmm ... In a real situation - yes, why not ... That's why you surround her to attack with a whole pack and destroy ...

    Surprise, be afraid ... You didn’t want to be friends with Russia on an equal footing, you wanted to humiliate and slander, ruin Russia ... Get what you earned ...
  43. Riv
    +1
    21 June 2016 11: 59
    I sympathize with the bourgeois. Recently at work: we are sitting in the office, everything is calm ... Suddenly a thud from the street. Everyone ran in, thought something exploded at the factory. Then I looked out the window and I see an inversion trace in the sky. The plane switched to supersonic.
    So even we are scared, and only to him - God himself ordered to be afraid.
    1. 0
      21 June 2016 12: 56
      Ger is an army general, let me tell you that Hodges (in my opinion a three-star general) is not a military man and should not be scared. If they have cashew young women commanding troops then ... real men and women were transferred to Europe and overseas and yesterday’s macaques and buggers stayed there. Pah byak
  44. 0
    21 June 2016 12: 00
    I just didn’t understand, entot type pepper for free wants to valerian with diapers to beg, no, figuras, the freebie is over stop
  45. +1
    21 June 2016 12: 01
    Don't be upset, old man. You will also show good speed, if only something ... When you scratch from our borders.
  46. +1
    21 June 2016 12: 14
    General, for us it is a necessary necessity - the rapid mobility of large contingents. But we are doing this within our borders, so there is no reason to be afraid of you, unlike you, we are not climbing around the world.
  47. 0
    21 June 2016 12: 31
    About Ben:
    two blondes stand in front of a statue of David by sculptor Michelangelo in Florence. Here one says to the other: "After all, Big Ben is the Tower of the Tower in London." wink
  48. 0
    21 June 2016 12: 47
    “What concerns me most is the freedom of movement of Russian troops. Their sudden inspections, which they conduct, personally surprise me - whenever they do this. So you can understand why this scares me, ”Hodges quoted the BBC.

    Nice. Tip: change the diapers and get out of the borders of Russia, then you will not have to take depressants in liters. bully stop
  49. +3
    21 June 2016 13: 30
    And what is the relationship between military exercises in Russia and the problems of Europe?
  50. +1
    21 June 2016 13: 35
    They need to introduce a new line of spending into NATO - the acquisition of diapers in the event of another sudden check of the combat readiness of the Russian army.
  51. 0
    21 June 2016 15: 08
    I’m focusing on Putin in 2018, for a 12-year presidential term, so what about the third world war......)))))))))))))
  52. 0
    21 June 2016 16: 14
    ...It frightens me

    Why is he so afraid, they have the “Avengers” and Spider-Man. ;)
  53. 0
    21 June 2016 17: 47
    The general still has everything ahead - his troops can move so quickly that the English Channel will not stop.
  54. 0
    21 June 2016 19: 15
    They get what they want, they themselves create the conditions for our progressive development...
  55. 0
    21 June 2016 19: 53
    Hodges: surprise checks of troops conducted in the Russian Federation both surprise and frighten
    Hodges, well, it’s just obvious...
  56. 0
    21 June 2016 20: 06
    in Europe “it is necessary to create a military Schengen zone to give freedom of movement to alliance troops”
    Or maybe in the USA???
  57. 0
    22 June 2016 02: 07
    “Sudden exercises in Russia violate military transparency mechanisms in Europe and undermine transparency and predictability in the region.”


    Verbiage and nothing more. I can’t even imagine what it’s like to “Undermine transparency... in addition to predictability.” What did he want to say by this, that in Europe we have broken “Transparency”? Those are scoundrels... =) soldier
  58. 0
    22 June 2016 14: 14
    Quote: drundel861
    According to him, in Europe "it is necessary to create a military Schengen zone in order to give freedom to the movement of the alliance forces."

    Previously, there was an article that the process of coordinating the movement of troops in Europe with local authorities takes up to 30 days. And in the USA itself, not everything is so smooth. In my opinion, this year the Americans tried or conducted exercises in Texas. So the state governor said that he regarded this as an invasion (apparently no one agreed with him on this issue in advance) and promised to involve the state’s national guard to counteract it. I don’t know how it ended. So Hodges most likely has this side of the issue in mind. In Russia there are no such problems and this bothers him (them).