Military Review

Russian military tested short-range antimissiles

71
Specialists of the Air Defense Forces of the Russian Aerospace Force of the Russian Federation conducted a successful test of anti-missile missiles at the Sary-Shagan test site (Kazakhstan), the press service reported. Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.


Russian military tested short-range antimissiles


“The aim of the launch was to confirm the tactical and technical characteristics of the anti-missile missiles that are in service with the VKS,” the release said.

“The anti-missile defense system of the missile defense system during the tests carried out successfully completed the task, hitting the conventional target at a set time,” the press service of the commander of troops Victor Humenny, who arrived at the training ground “to control the preparation and conduct of a test launch,” quotes.

“At present, air defense and anti-missile defense forces of the Aerospace Forces have a serious technical and technological reserve in the field of the development and use of missile defense systems. As part of the development and improvement of the components of the Russian missile defense system, the modernization of the information resources of the system is being conducted. At the same time, scientific and development work is underway to create promising anti-missile weapons, which will significantly expand the combat capabilities of the missile defense system, ”the press service noted.

"The composition and combat characteristics of the Russian missile defense system allow us to fend off the threat of a possible nuclear missile strike, raise the nuclear response threshold, increase the survivability of the highest levels of military and government control, using the high-precision anti-jam information tools to open the level, purpose and focus "- said in a statement.
Photos used:
wikimapia.org
71 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Pereira
    Pereira 21 June 2016 09: 33
    -6
    All this is good.
    It is not clear against what purpose? Middle-range is how? Against a warhead that is already falling on his head? Instead of hitting her in space?
    Of course, I am not a specialist in rocketry, but the technology is not alien. And something in this article bothers me.
    1. 76SSSR
      76SSSR 21 June 2016 09: 43
      +11
      Against the warhead of a ballistic missile, but if it is short-range, then interception in the atmosphere.
      1. The black
        The black 21 June 2016 09: 45
        +5
        Russian military tested short-range antimissiles
        Guys, do not be afraid that the NATO Secretary General will throw himself out the window shouting "Russians are coming!" Why take sin on your soul? laughing
        1. papas-57
          papas-57 21 June 2016 11: 13
          0
          "Guys, do not be afraid that the NATO secretary general will throw himself out the window shouting" The Russians are coming! "Nothing terrible will happen. They have a lot of people who want to fill this position. then frighten the West with the `` Russian threat ''.
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. lukewarm
          lukewarm 21 June 2016 11: 54
          +5
          The main thing is that yo .. leaned on Hillary and turned that neck.
          1. Monarchist
            Monarchist 21 June 2016 13: 37
            0
            Ensign, you are not respectful with the lady. Do you know why she is so shy? She needs a good man, otherwise the faithful Monica looked up under her skirt, but forgot her ... though she can .. she is transgressive (they can have everything)? In this case....
            1. begemot20091
              begemot20091 21 June 2016 15: 14
              -1
              she is lesbian

              http://general-ivanoff.livejournal.com/52966.html
        4. GSH-18
          GSH-18 21 June 2016 12: 47
          0
          Quote: Black
          Guys, do not be afraid that the NATO secretary general will throw himself out the window shouting "Russians are coming!" Why take sin on your soul? laughing

          Everything goes to that lol
      2. oborzevatel
        oborzevatel 21 June 2016 09: 49
        +1
        Quote: 76SSSR
        Against a ballistic missile warhead

        I specify:
        против conditional warheads.
        How it is implemented - I will not say.
        Think for yourself.
        1. Patriot 1
          Patriot 1 21 June 2016 10: 31
          +7
          Quote: oborzevatel
          Quote: 76SSSR
          Against a ballistic missile warhead

          I specify:
          против conditional warheads.
          How it is implemented - I will not say.
          Think for yourself.

          According to information known to all, the US missile defense system in Europe is nothing more than a veiled installation of medium-range ballistic / tactical missiles. Those. in fact, Russia has weapons prohibited by the treaty at its borders, but it is rather difficult to present something officially, ....
          So Russia has taken up missile defense systems. Good move :)
          1. An64
            An64 21 June 2016 10: 47
            +1
            Do not juggle either ... What "ballistic / tactical medium-range missiles" can be installed in the Mk41 launcher?
            The technical side of the issue is never harmful ...
            And if this is "information known to all," can we, uneducated people, have a link?
          2. lukewarm
            lukewarm 21 June 2016 11: 56
            +1
            It seems that these launching tomahawks can be installed. But not RSD. There is a difference
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Rus2012
          Rus2012 21 June 2016 10: 36
          +6
          Quote: oborzevatel
          against a conditional warhead.
          How it is implemented - I will not say.
          Think for yourself.

          ... it's not a secret how and why - http://militaryrussia.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=401&t=509&sid=d51d139070764e3d64b

          02f7dfd87fe16&start=340
          System A-135 Cupid, rocket 53Т6 - ABM-3 GAZELLE
          The Strategic Rocket Forces Information and Public Relations Service reported that this is the 42th launch of this type of anti-missile system since 1983 of the year. No target was reported to have been hit by an interceptor missile. Typically, such tests are considered successful if the machine detonates a rocket at a given point in space. In such cases, the combat crew counts the conditional defeat of the target.

          As a source in the rocket and space industry told VZGLYAD, a 53X6 type missile, which is part of the A-135 missile defense system, was launched from the firing range.



          1. kolexxx
            kolexxx 21 June 2016 15: 21
            +2
            Class! At 14 seconds I saw a relative! It's nice how. Proud !!!
        4. guzik007
          guzik007 21 June 2016 12: 55
          -2
          How it is implemented - I will not say.
          Think for yourself.
          -------------------------------
          Uh, you, well, you are a little bent. They launched a medium-range ballistic from Kapustin Yar to a training ground in Kazakhstan. They were already waiting there, probably knowing both the route and the flight time. And how it will be in real life, I’m afraid the tale is about how smooth it was on paper. Yes, I forgot about the ravines. Or ... how they forgot the missile defense in the ravine. The pun came out: =)
          1. Rus2012
            Rus2012 21 June 2016 14: 30
            0
            Quote: guzik007
            They launched a medium-range ballistic from Kapustin Yar to a training ground in the Republic of Kazakhstan.

            Quote: Just
            RM: "Squirrel", "Swift", "Zvezda-4", "


            Armavir ", & q
            uot; Pishchal "," Wild boar "(most likely them, maybe they are an imitator of BR)

            /// nobody, any "mock targets", from nowhere started!
            First, all that you have listed - the maximum can mimic RSD.
            And then the Gazelle is fighting the BB ICBM.
            Secondly, the interception by Gazelles is based on undermining a special combat unit. Who and when and who will be allowed to "play as an adult"?

            Therefore, see above -
            such tests are considered successful if the machine detonates a rocket at a given point in space. In such cases, the combat crew counts the conditional defeat of the target.

            Moreover, the "conditional goal" is imitated conditionally, i.e. estimated ...
            1. uhu189
              uhu189 21 June 2016 14: 42
              0
              It turns out very peculiarly - to fight ballistic missiles with high-altitude nuclear explosions over their own territory, followed by radioactive contamination of the area. At the time of the union, this decision was still suitable for the lack of the best technology at that time, and now? By the heading it can be judged that our new missile defense was invented, but here in fact it turns out to be just a check of the reliability of the existing system.
        5. Simple
          Simple 21 June 2016 12: 56
          0
          Quote: oborzevatel
          How it is implemented - I will not say.

          "big secret?

          RM: "Squirrel", "Swift", "Zvezda-4", "
          Armavir ", & q
          uot; Pishchal ", "Boar"(most likely them, since they are a BR simulator)

          и
          PNK "Lisa"

      3. Pereira
        Pereira 21 June 2016 10: 00
        -1
        Short-Range Nuclear Warhead Missile? Whose is this? Iranian?
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 21 June 2016 11: 13
          0
          Just a short-range missile defense missile with a nuclear warhead.
    2. The black
      The black 21 June 2016 09: 46
      +5
      It is not clear against what purpose?
      Only the Target knows this; she may have seen a rocket. But not very long. But she will not tell anyone. smile
    3. sergey2017
      sergey2017 21 June 2016 10: 34
      +1
      Short-range missiles (such as the A-135 system) are capable of intercepting enemy ballistic missiles and their warheads flying at altitudes from 5 km to near space! This is a serious bid to win!
    4. Homo
      Homo 21 June 2016 16: 28
      0
      Quote: Pereira
      Against a warhead that is already falling on his head? Instead of hitting her in space?

      And against tactical missiles missile defense is not needed?
      1. Pereira
        Pereira 22 June 2016 00: 19
        -1
        Not. For this, C-400.
  2. Mama_Cholli
    Mama_Cholli 21 June 2016 09: 33
    +10
    This is what an article about new weapons systems should look like.
    Everything is clear and "understandable". winked
    1. Observer2014
      Observer2014 21 June 2016 09: 38
      +3
      Mama_Cholli (3) RU Today, 09:33 AM New
      This is what an article about new weapons systems should look like.
      Everything is clear and "understandable". winked

      The photo for the article is generally dead! At once everyone understood what kind of rocket it was laughing
      1. demiurg
        demiurg 21 June 2016 09: 52
        +5
        On the territory of the unit are SBCH. The attempt to crawl inside for more visual photos will end at best with light beatings from the guard. And it’s easy from the point of view of object protection. And it’s right, for nofik.
        1. Observer2014
          Observer2014 21 June 2016 09: 59
          +2
          demiurg (1) RU Today, 09:52 ↑ New
          On the territory of the unit are SBCH. The attempt to crawl inside for more visual photos will end at best with light beatings from the guard. and it’s easy from the point of view of object protection.

          However, you literally understand everything! I’ll open a little secret. Now I’d like to watch a photo or video with a similar event, or some kind of technique. You don’t have to climb through the fences. And even more so with the protection of butting. laughing You can just google it repeat
        2. oborzevatel
          oborzevatel 21 June 2016 10: 11
          +6
          Quote: demiurg
          On the territory of the unit are UBC.

          The landfill is in Kazakhstan.
          There is no SBN there.
          OL brought there without her.
          Calm down.
        3. Simple
          Simple 21 June 2016 12: 44
          +3
          Quote: demiurg
          On the territory of the unit there are

          no sbch there.
          Kazakhstan is a non-nuclear power. All exported
          10-th State Testing Ground of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation Military unit 03080.
          It was:
          Site number 1 RTN system "A"
          Site number 2 RTN system "A"
          Site No. 3 = (No. 53) RTN system "A"
          Site No. 3Д “Buran” laser complex, NIP-3 Strategic Rocket Forces
          Site number 4 Priozersk
          Site No. 6 = (No.52) RSVPR system “A”, anti-missile launcher B-1000,
          Firing range "Aldan"
          Site No. 7 Air defense missile defense B-1000, “Flounder” airdrome
          Site No. 8 radar CSO-P, Don-2NP, 5Н79-С8 Daryal
          Site number 11 radar "Neman"
          Site number 9 = Site number 54 = Balkhash-9
          Site No. 14 transmitting position Danube-2, Danube-3UP
          Site No. 15 receiving position Danube-2, Danube-3UP
          Site No. 23 training center for the combat use of anti-aircraft missile forces
          Site No. 25 training center for the combat use of anti-aircraft missile forces,
          Site No. 35 system "Dal", C-75, C-200, C-225 "Azov", anti-missile silos 53Т6
          Site No. 38 = (No. 51) RE-4 radar, 5Н25 Argun firing range, Istra radar, Ruza radar
          Site No. 40 Management of the landfill. GKVTS.
          Site number 51 IP
          Site No. 52 Firing range "Aldan", silos anti-missile 51T6
          Site No. 54 = Site No. 9
          Site number 70 SP (1974 year)
          Site number 79 IP
          But Kazakhs are famous "deistroyers".
          little left

          LLP (maintenance-free amplification point) pulled out of the ground.

          No traces of the aerial parts, the pit is buried. It seems that the Kazakhs are dismantling the NUPs and communications in full - we saw dozens of such barrels, and a little further we met an excavator that was digging a ditch from under the cable. In general, cable and pipes in Kazakhstan are already mined as minerals, industrially, using excavators, cranes and other special equipment.
          and you mean "SBCH" ....
      2. oborzevatel
        oborzevatel 21 June 2016 09: 53
        +1
        Quote: Observer2014
        Immediately everyone understood what kind of rocket it was

        Read more carefully:
        confirmation of the performance characteristics missile defense, Armed Forces

        We have many types of PR in service?
        Well, think it over.
        Based on the fact that apart from the A-135 missile defense system, there is nothing more in service.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 21 June 2016 11: 15
          +3
          Soon in service with Moscow's missile defense system, Nudol
    2. Khariton
      Khariton 21 June 2016 09: 40
      +2
      Quote: Mama_Cholli
      This is what an article about new weapons systems should look like.
      Everything is clear and "understandable". winked

      The main thing is to intrigue .... And to make it clear that Russia has seriously taken up the rearmament of its Army! Again, do not sleep at night and think ..))))
  3. Irokez
    Irokez 21 June 2016 09: 36
    +4
    Shield and sword. The eternal struggle. All missiles have anti-missiles. And on a sly face there is a simple fist.
    1. oborzevatel
      oborzevatel 21 June 2016 09: 56
      0
      Quote: Irokez
      All missiles have anti-missiles.

      I would like to.
      But for now, no. Not at all.
      I hope that not yet.
  4. Alexey-74
    Alexey-74 21 June 2016 09: 36
    +4
    Our developers are just great fellows, have not lost groundwork during the time of devastation and moreover have improved everything in accordance with the time. I hope someday we will hear that a dome has been created over Russia that protects 100%
  5. Barakuda
    Barakuda 21 June 2016 09: 36
    +1
    Maybe someone in the know? WHAT IS IT ? What is a missile defense system? short range? If only I could see the photo. Or from S-400 scorching.
    1. oborzevatel
      oborzevatel 21 June 2016 09: 55
      +1
      Quote: Barracuda
      What is a missile defense system?

      I answer again.
      Read the text carefully.
      confirmation of the performance characteristics missile defense, Armed Forces

      Next - read above.
    2. Khariton
      Khariton 21 June 2016 10: 32
      +2
      Quote: Barracuda
      Maybe someone in the know? WHAT IS IT ? What is a missile defense system? short range? If only I could see the photo. Or from S-400 scorching.

      Just recently experienced in Toulouse ...))) The most short-range action! bully
      It seems that TTX performed well! laughing

      Go Russia!
    3. Vadim237
      Vadim237 21 June 2016 11: 22
      -2
      Gazelle rocket
      Length: 10 m
      Diameter: 1,72 m
      Weight: 9693 kg
      Type of warhead: special (nuclear).
      Warhead power: 10 ct.
      Firing range, maximum: 60 km
      Minimum firing range: 10 km
      The height of the affected area, maximum: 45 km
      The height of the affected area, minimum: 5 km
      Rocket speed: 5 km / s - 3600 m / s
      Flight time: no more than 12 seconds.
      Acceleration to maximum speed (according to various sources) - 3 — 4 seconds
      The exit time from the launcher from the moment of launch is 0,2-0,4 seconds.
      Maximum overloads:
      longitudinal - 210 g;
      transverse - 90 g.
      Missile deflection angle after launch: up to 70 degrees.
      Type of launcher: mine.
      1. Zloy ork
        Zloy ork 21 June 2016 12: 48
        -4
        The time of approach of hypersonic ammunition from the moment of exit from the ionosphere (detection) to the fuse detonation is about 3 seconds, if buried, then about 7 seconds. If the release in the final section is under the control of a mechanical device, then even EMR cannot be cut down. So, for the interception of what targets this Gazelle rocket was made, and what will be the result of the interception, think about it. Looks like another Mace X)))
        1. Operator
          Operator 21 June 2016 14: 53
          +1
          The height of the lower boundary of the ionosphere is 85 km, the angle of inclination of the trajectory of the ICBM warhead from 30 to 45 degrees, the distance of the BB in the lower atmosphere from 114 to 170 km, the flight time of the BB with deceleration due to aerodynamic drag 20 to 30 seconds.

          PS Looks like another officer daughter am
          1. Zloy ork
            Zloy ork 21 June 2016 15: 40
            -5
            Yeah, in the Gazelle, it means 3600 m / s and BB about 7000 m / s? Do you want 40 km / s? And on the corner of the descent, Darling, you lagged behind. There are already no 30-45 degrees, long gone. There is already MHD flow and taxiing is outdated, and you tell me the children’s numbers.
        2. Vadim237
          Vadim237 21 June 2016 15: 05
          -1
          This missile was designed to intercept warheads at altitudes of 10 to 45 kilometers using a nuclear charge, and at the expense of detecting missiles and warheads, they will be detected thousands of kilometers using the SPRN system, which is connected by a single system to the airborne, air defense and missile defense systems of Moscow. The first version of this missile was created back in the early 70s, the 5Y27 missile had the same speed of 15,5 Makhov and it already successfully intercepted the BMD warheads, the 53T6 Gazelle missile is part of the Moscow missile defense system A 135 - there are a total of 68 missiles under the control of Don’s radar 2H
          TTX radar:
          Range - Centimeter
          Dimensions of the structure - 130 x 130 x 45 m (height 33 m according to other data)
          The length of the rib of the truncated part is 100 m
          The diameter of the antenna is 16 m (18 m according to other data)
          Radiated power - 250 MW
          Detection range of ballistic targets - 1200-1500 km (according to other data, up to 3700 km according to the MS of ICBMs)
          Range of detection of space targets - 600-1000 km
          The radar viewing angles in azimuth are 360 ​​degrees.
          Coordinate measurement accuracy:
          - range - 200 (100) m
          - elevation - 0,02-0,04 (0,06) deg.
          The number of simultaneously accompanied ballistic targets - up to 120 elements of SBC (complex ballistic targets)
          The number of simultaneously guided missiles - several dozen (no more than 100 pieces)
          1. Zloy ork
            Zloy ork 21 June 2016 15: 47
            -9
            You will not find anything, in fact, there will be no launches. America has the technology for superlight destruction of any target, it is enough to have matter in a confused state with the target. For example, they take DNA from a shelf, squeeze out protons and push them into an accelerator, such a small accelerator right on the table. And it’s necessary, someone has a headache !!! And the haters learn to intercept BB X)))
            1. Grim Reaper
              Grim Reaper 21 June 2016 18: 28
              +5
              Quote: Zloy Ork
              You will not find anything, in fact, there will be no launches. America has the technology for superlight destruction of any target, it is enough to have matter in a confused state with the target. For example, they take DNA from a shelf, squeeze out protons and push them into an accelerator, such a small accelerator right on the table. And it’s necessary, someone has a headache !!! And the haters learn to intercept BB X)))

              Beaver! Exhale! .....
  6. edeligor
    edeligor 21 June 2016 09: 36
    0
    I still do not understand from the article, a new missile defense or being in service? As far as I know, of those in service there are no short-range missile defense missiles ... Who is in the subject?
    1. oborzevatel
      oborzevatel 21 June 2016 10: 05
      +1
      Quote: edeligor
      As far as I know, there are no short-range missile defense systems in service ...

      Just besides
      short-range missile defense missiles ...

      no other PR in service while no

      53T6 (PRS-1), according to NATO codification SH-08 / ABM-3A GAZELLE, Rus. Gazelle - missile defense near interception.
      Missile characteristics:

      Firing Range, maximum: 60 km (50 km).
      Firing range, minimum: 10 km.
      1. Rus2012
        Rus2012 21 June 2016 14: 41
        0
        Quote: oborzevatel
        53T6 (PRS-1),

        ...пишут - http://militaryrussia.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=401&t=509&sid=13bb0ce53f1c8eb84d6
        39cb911ef0326 & start = 340
        Yes
        PR 53Т6М, this is the same 53Т6, but with equipment on a modern element base
    2. An64
      An64 21 June 2016 10: 40
      +1
      Quote: edeligor
      I still do not understand from the article, a new missile defense or being in service? As far as I know, of those in service there are no short-range missile defense missiles ... Who is in the subject?

      If you follow the link to the website of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, then everything is written there:
      "The purpose of the launch was to confirm the tactical and technical characteristics missile defense missile defense systems Armed Forces.
      ...The missile defense system is in service with the missile defense system. With the creation on August 1, 2015 of the Aerospace Forces (VKS), the missile defense compound became part of the 1st Army of Special Air and Anti-Ballistic Missile Defense of the new branch of the RF Armed Forces ... "
  7. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 21 June 2016 09: 49
    0
    I didn’t understand what against which missiles this product is planned to be used. Missile defense in Poland and Romania - we laugh, but here we scratch our turnips.
    1. Genry
      Genry 21 June 2016 10: 10
      +2
      Quote: avg-mgn
      against which missiles is this product planned to be used

      If your set of words is completed with a question mark, then the answer to this question will be:
      Quote: avg-mgn
      Missile defense in Poland and Romania
  8. Taygerus
    Taygerus 21 June 2016 09: 52
    +2
    probably for the striped elves to cool off in Syria
  9. Ros 56
    Ros 56 21 June 2016 10: 14
    0
    This is a very necessary thing, who did not understand, think before asking questions.
  10. iliya87
    iliya87 21 June 2016 10: 15
    -3
    Do not boil guys. An air defense is being created with the ability to bombard objects on the ground. The trick is that medium and short-range missiles are banned (for us and the USA) https://topwar.ru/33307-esche-raz-o-raketah-sredney-dalnosti.html Americans install under the guise of missile defense and air defense systems as if for air targets but with the ability to shoot and ground. Ours said well and began to build their own air defense and missile defense with the possibility of shelling the ground, including this complex. A medium-range system is coming soon. Already existing systems are being modernized (although according to some reports, this feature was included in a number of complexes by default)
    1. Genry
      Genry 21 June 2016 10: 25
      0
      Quote: iliya87
      At the same time, the Americans set up under the guise of missile defense and air defense systems as if for air targets but with the ability to shoot at ground targets.

      Quote: iliya87
      Ours said well and began to build their air defense and missile defense with the possibility of shelling the ground, ........ (although according to some reports, this option was included in a number of complexes by default)

      All marine missile defense systems can operate on the surface.
      Accordingly, their land analogues.
      1. iliya87
        iliya87 21 June 2016 11: 56
        +1
        And what about the complexes? An important factor is the type of missile. Not all complexes have rockets capable of causing acceptable damage to the ground.
        Price / Efficiency Do not forget this simple truth. And of course, do not forget that they can already start with the C300PM but only in coordinates i.e. to the selected area. There was no missile in air defense and missile defense capable of delivering a point strike and acceptable damage, for example, to a moving column (with a possible change in the trajectory of movement) And now there is such an opportunity.
    2. oborzevatel
      oborzevatel 21 June 2016 11: 22
      0
      Quote: iliya87
      Ours said well and began to build their air defense and missile defense in the same way with the possibility of shelling the earth, including this complex.

      Write nonsense, my dear.
      Specifically - about this complex.
      We laughed very loudly for a long time.
  11. Editor
    Editor 21 June 2016 10: 23
    0
    Quote: oborzevatel

    Based on the fact that apart from the A-135 missile defense system, there is nothing more in service.


    so like the A-235 already tested ...
    or "Nudal" ...
    1. oborzevatel
      oborzevatel 21 June 2016 11: 26
      +1
      Read carefully.
      Based on the fact that apart from the A-135 missile defense system, there is nothing more in service.

      Quote: Redactor
      so like the A-235 already tested ...
      or "Nudal" ...

      And figure out how much time goes from testing to adoption.
  12. atamankko
    atamankko 21 June 2016 10: 27
    0
    To whom the message is addressed, he understands everything.
  13. mlad
    mlad 21 June 2016 10: 33
    0
    Yes, misunderstandings with the rocket, rather something old was a little modernized and specially raised a fuss - and we have our own missile defense system. C500 will disappear because it is not accepted for service.
  14. Demontek
    Demontek 21 June 2016 10: 34
    0
    So, as I understand it, such launches are regularly conducted to check. Exactly a year ago, there was also a launch, even an anniversary one (the 50th), but there was no such hype. Apparently because of the commissioning of the American missile defense system in Romania and Poland, the media has given such attention to this launch.
    Here, about last year’s launch:
    http://igor-vityuk.livejournal.com/177088.html
  15. Engineer
    Engineer 21 June 2016 10: 54
    -1
    Quote: oborzevatel

    I specify:
    против conditional warheads.
    How it is implemented - I will not say.
    Think for yourself.


    Because you don’t know? There is no need to think over anything - even schoolchildren have already written everything about it.
    1. oborzevatel
      oborzevatel 21 June 2016 11: 32
      +2
      Quote: Engineer
      Because you don’t know? There is no need to think over anything - even schoolchildren have already written everything about it.

      My dear, I served in the 9th ABM division.
      Further decrypt?
      Or yourself think up?

      And about pedovikyu - well, I believe.
      With a link to such a source, you finally defeated me hi
      Moreover, since such great experts they write articles there request .
  16. Wedmak
    Wedmak 21 June 2016 11: 45
    +3
    Oh, I don’t know what you are arguing about. Launches of these missiles are in the public domain. Of course, no one will tell you the exact modification, but you can understand the idea of ​​the process.

  17. shinobi
    shinobi 21 June 2016 11: 51
    +1
    Yeah, well now it’s clear why the Deputy Yankesov’s secretary shouted so much about violating the RMBD. They remembered that theirs could be destroyed even at the start-up to our ICBMs. In combination with the Iskanders, their missile defense is a waste of resources, especially since our systems are mobile in most Guess where we will deploy them.
  18. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 21 June 2016 12: 12
    0
    Vicki claims that such missile defense missiles of Moscow
    68 units with nuclear warheads deployed.

    And radar "Don" controls them all.
    1. Operator
      Operator 21 June 2016 15: 13
      +2
      The short-range Gazelle missile is equipped with a 3 ct neutron warhead due to the inoperability of any GOS in the air at speeds from 3000 to 5000 m / s (from 10 to 17 M) due to the formation of a plasma cloud around the missile.

      Gazelle uses external target designation from a ground based radar. The coordinates of the target are transmitted to the missile via a radio beam from another ground radar. A plasma cloud for receiving a radio signal breaks through freon through special nozzles at the end of a missile defense.

      Since the accuracy of external target designation is insufficient for the kinetic interception of an ICBM warhead, an atmospheric missile uses a neutron warhead with a radius of guaranteed destruction by a neutron flux of the order of 200-300 meters.

      A high-altitude explosion of a "clean" low-power neutron charge does not cause radioactive contamination of the earth's surface.
      1. Rus2012
        Rus2012 21 June 2016 15: 21
        0
        Quote: Operator
        Gazelle short-range missile defense

        ... he was already declassified and put up in the museum -
        A very interesting exhibit appeared in the Patriot park near Moscow - for the first time in history, one of the most classified weapons systems, an element of the Moscow missile defense A-135 Amur, was displayed in public.
        There is no explanatory plate next to the exhibit, but judging by the photographs published on the network, we are talking about the 53Т6 anti-missile (Gazelle according to NATO classification) on a loading machine. The car is also not easy - a rare modification of the MAZ-543M with equipment for loading a rocket into the mine - but its burden is much more interesting.
        Adopted by 35 years ago, the Gazelles, by their characteristics, still have no analogues. A missile with monstrous acceleration starts in 100 g is capable of intercepting targets flying at a speed of up to seven kilometers per second.
        53Т6 is a pointed cone, its body is made by winding a composite material. The onboard power supply is also wound into the housing. This design allows the equipment to withstand the enormous overloads arising in flight: longitudinal to 210 g, transverse to 90.
        A missile has a nuclear missile. The nozzles at the ends of the transport container are intended for the thermostatic stabilization system of the warhead, since the weapons-grade plutonium that makes up the charge in the state of rest has the property of heating.
        Most likely, only a container without a missile inside was exhibited in Kubinka, but even so, the component of the secret Russian missile defense system was put up for public viewing for the first time.
        - One position of Moscow air defense disclosed. There are about 149 left, ”visitors to the military blog joke.
        For several years now, components of the new missile defense system of the center of Russia, A-235 Nudol, have been tested in Russia. It will use both operating elements - for example, the unique Don-2Н radar, as well as new ones.

        https://news.rambler.ru/scitech/33972397/?utm_source=rt&utm_medium=exchange&utm_
        campaign = news & utm_term = block_teaser

        This suggests that there is something new :)
        For example, from the MO site - http://structure.mil.ru/structure/forces/cosmic/weapons/[email protected]
        fMilitaryModel
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. quolta
    quolta 21 June 2016 12: 51
    0
    Quote: unwillingly
    The main thing is that yo .. leaned on Hillary and turned that neck.

    )))))))))))))))
  21. kolexxx
    kolexxx 21 June 2016 15: 30
    0
    ..... a missile defense can only be deployed in Cuba, this is for those who have not yet understood ..... by analogy with missile defense in Romania and Poland, and is designed against US intercontinental missiles ..... the rest of the stray from Europe goes astray standard air defense strategic missile forces ....
  22. Vadim237
    Vadim237 21 June 2016 17: 22
    0
    "An anti-missile can only be deployed in Cuba" - It is necessary from the beginning to ask the Cuban government whether it wants it or not - most likely the answer will be negative.
    1. kolexxx
      kolexxx 21 June 2016 17: 30
      0
      There are other ways to keep such a masterpiece of the defense product near by at Amers.
  23. Old26
    Old26 21 June 2016 20: 54
    -1
    Quote: sergey2017
    Short-range missiles (such as the A-135 system) are capable of intercepting enemy ballistic missiles and their warheads flying at altitudes from 5 km to near space! This is a serious bid to win!

    Halve the sturgeon by about half ...

    Quote: Zloy Ork
    Yeah, in the Gazelle, it means 3600 m / s and BB about 7000 m / s? Do you want 40 km / s?

    Why so little. They would have written 400 km per second or 4000.

    Quote: kolexxx
    ..... a missile defense can only be deployed in Cuba, this is for those who have not yet understood ..... by analogy with missile defense in Romania and Poland, and is designed against US intercontinental missiles ..... the rest of the stray from Europe goes astray standard air defense strategic missile forces ....

    I am one of those who have not yet understood. Nah.rena this missile in Cuba? I do not even ask for permission from the Cuban government. Its range is a couple of hundred kilometers. It will not completely cover Florida, and the US missile bases are located almost in the north of the United States, on the borders with Canada, and at the same time I will trajectory either through the North Pole or through the Pacific Ocean. What for this missile in Cuba ??

    Quote: kolexxx
    There are other ways to keep such a masterpiece of the defense product near by at Amers.

    What kind? Speak to us these options ...


    Quote: DemonTek
    Apparently due to the commissioning of the American missile defense system in Romania and Poland

    In Poland, they are still planning ...

    Quote: iliya87
    Do not boil guys. An air defense is being created with the ability to bombard objects on the ground. The trick is that medium and short-range missiles are banned (for us and the USA) https://topwar.ru/33307-esche-raz-o-raketah-sredney-dalnosti.html Americans install under the guise of missile defense and air defense systems as if for air targets but with the ability to shoot and ground. Ours said well and began to build their own air defense and missile defense with the possibility of shelling the ground, including this complex. A medium-range system is coming soon. Already existing systems are being modernized (although according to some reports, this feature was included in a number of complexes by default)

    And what for, please tell me? Why do you need to specifically create air defense with the ability to fire at ground targets? Moreover, the accuracy of such an anti-aircraft ground missile in comparison with tactical and operational tactical complexes will be below the plinth. The flight range of the most-most of the air defense missiles is less than that of the same Iskander. Where have you read such nonsense about the special construction of air defense systems that will hit ground targets. In general, it would be interesting to look at such a target after being "hit" by such an anti-aircraft missile. Especially given that the rocket will have a disc field of destruction by the rod part
    1. Zloy ork
      Zloy ork 21 June 2016 22: 28
      -2
      40 km / s is enough to break through the Gazelle sludge. And what kind of education do you have? I have Volgograd State Technical University, ATF, PU (launchers), and I have R&D, and who will you be?
  24. Old26
    Old26 21 June 2016 23: 15
    +3
    Quote: Zloy Ork
    40 km / s is enough to break through the Gazelle sludge. And what kind of education do you have? I have Volgograd State Technical University, ATF, PU (launchers), and I have R&D, and who will you be?

    He began to study at LETI. Specialty ACS missile systems. Then, due to health reasons, he transferred to the south. Novocherkassk Polytechnic. More than 20 years of work in KB. He finished work as the chief designer of the project. Enough?
    That's just vague doubts about your qualifications torment me. Speeds of 40 km / s, sufficient for a breakthrough ... And where did you just find them ....
    1. Zloy ork
      Zloy ork 22 June 2016 10: 15
      0
      I have seven years of work in a specialty in a private research institute. Engaged in proton injectors. The tip of our emitter was tested with an on-going plasma flow of 40 km / s; operability was maintained. Here we have not achieved resistance to the impulsive field. And in the Central Design Bureau Titan at this time, the salary was 3800 rubles, we laughed. In 2009, the owner of the office was killed. Now I am peacefully and quietly involved in tuning yachts and boats. However, I know how the bourgeoisie likes to invest in high-tech and can imagine their current capabilities. I recently told a Titanovets about our work, you should have seen his face. They still have plasma flow realized by burning fuel - shame at the level of a steam locomotive.