Military Review

NATO tried to "disprove 5 Russian myths" about the alliance

73
The NATO leadership has published material in which, according to its opinion, “refuted 5 of Russian myths” about the alliance’s intentions, reports Look.

NATO tried to "disprove 5 Russian myths" about the alliance


In particular, "refuting" the statement of Moscow that NATO is trying to surround Russia, Western analysts give the following argument: "The length of the common border of Russia with the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance is 1215 km, the entire length of the land border of the state exceeds 20 thousand km." Apparently, these figures should indicate that the environment of the Russian Federation is impossible physically.

Also related to the category of myths is the assertion that NATO seeks to isolate Russia from Europe. The submission states that no isolation exists, the alliance has simply suspended "practical cooperation with Moscow" because of its aggressive actions in Ukraine.

The third “myth” concerns the statement about the threat to the security of Russia from the American missile defense system being deployed in Europe. The document states that the European missile defense system has never been directed against the Russian Federation, its main goal is to protect against Iranian missiles, the production of which is not covered by a recently signed agreement.

“The anti-missile system, elements of which are located in Romania and Poland, is not technically capable of intercepting Russian missiles, and the Iranian agreement does not affect the production of ballistic missiles, from the threat of which missile defense is needed,” the material says.

As for the large-scale NATO exercises held near the Russian border and creating tension in the region, this is the right of sovereign European states operating under international agreements. At the same time, the authors of the document nod to Russia itself, which is not “embarrassed” to conduct such exercises on its territory.

The latter considers the “Russian myth” that “the open-door policy of NATO creates new dividing lines in Europe and deepens existing ones”. According to analysts, everything is just the opposite: "The expansion of NATO has contributed to the spread of democracy, security and the strengthening of stability throughout Europe."
Photos used:
http://stergiog.blogspot.com
73 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Sharky
    Sharky 17 June 2016 10: 01
    +31
    Well, well, I believe! Can you remove the noodles from your ears or wait until it cools down?
    1. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 17 June 2016 10: 07
      +11
      According to analysts, the exact opposite is true: "The expansion of NATO contributed to the spread of democracy, security and the strengthening of stability throughout Europe."

      What really means the spread of various branches of Islam, sec-minority groups, circular tolerance!
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Now we are free
        Now we are free 17 June 2016 10: 48
        +17
        Here is an interesting article by Colonel Kassada "On guarantees of non-NATO expansion" ... (Who cares)
        http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2802165.html

        "The fact that we are prepared not to deploy NATO troops outside the FRG territory gives the Soviet Union direct guarantees of security."
        17 May 1990

        (Quote from a speech in Brussels by NATO Secretary General Manfred Wörner, “The North Atlantic Alliance and European Security in the 1990s”).

        In general, the Poles and the "Nebrotyam" can now bear their obsession, and an adequate (not pro-Russian / pro-Putin) resident of Europe / the world sees everything with his own eyes.

        P.S. And the picture is so, reminded the content of NATO statements that the article laughing laughing laughing
        1. weksha50
          weksha50 17 June 2016 12: 04
          +1
          Quote: Now we are free
          And the picture is so, reminded



          "Come on, come on, take it off, otherwise there is nothing to lay under our feet at the entrance to our barracks - the bedding from the EU flag is already frayed" ...
      3. el coyote
        el coyote 17 June 2016 10: 51
        +1
        It only remains for them to stand in a circle, as in that joke about a chain of copulating hedgehogs.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 17 June 2016 10: 10
      +28
      Refuting Russian myths, NATO confirms its own. If their missile defense is useless against our missiles, then why build them on our borders? Then the protection of the countries of the alliance from the aggressor lies and the swindle of their partners. bully
      1. gray smeet
        gray smeet 17 June 2016 10: 19
        +9
        Some nonsense froze, others printed.
        1. Stalker.1977
          Stalker.1977 17 June 2016 10: 39
          +2
          The same is written on the fence ...............
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. dorz
        dorz 17 June 2016 11: 19
        +5
        Quote: siberalt
        Refuting Russian myths, NATO confirms its own. If their missile defense is useless against our missiles, then why build them on our borders? Then the protection of the countries of the alliance from the aggressor lies and the swindle of their partners. bully

        It was repeatedly voiced that missile defense can be instantly replaced by cruise missiles and no one will notice this.
        ABM in Europe is a 100% offensive system and it is aimed against Russia.
    4. vovanpain
      vovanpain 17 June 2016 10: 22
      +44
      The NATO leadership published a material in which, in its opinion, it “refuted 5 Russian myths” about the intentions of the alliance

      Something reminds: fellow
      1. Dali
        Dali 17 June 2016 11: 43
        +3
        Quote: vovanpain
        Something reminds:

        Yes, it is so, as soon as we agree with these "arguments" ...
    5. Skif83
      Skif83 17 June 2016 10: 26
      +9
      Behind all their seeming naive noodles, there is a different meaning. Judging by various statements, there are some who are not friends with the head of the NATO leadership. But it is better to take seriously and prepare for their not only chatter, but also possible actions.
      Hitler before the start of the Second World War also broke off in much the same way.
      Those. when there are certain VERY UNAUDICULOUS intentions regarding Russia, then any rhetoric is good, even at the level of moronic! angry
      1. CORNET
        CORNET 17 June 2016 10: 35
        0
        And what more evidence is needed ... Here is a photo that speaks for itself, about the essence of everything that is happening! We will arrange Berlin-Washington for you .... Finish, then do not be offended and do not whine!
    6. Imperialkolorad
      Imperialkolorad 17 June 2016 11: 48
      0
      Quote: Sharky
      Well, well, I believe! Can you remove the noodles from your ears or wait until it cools down?

      Yes there is noodles. They stupidly reprinted their main Wishlist in relation to Russia.
    7. arane
      arane 17 June 2016 11: 54
      +6
      Quote: Sharky
      Well, well, I believe! Can you remove the noodles from your ears or wait until it cools down?


      Missile defense elements located in romania and poland are not technically capable of shooting down Russian missiles. Therefore, the pro system is not directed against Russia.

      Russian troops stationed in Kaliningrad and generally on the western borders of the Russian Federation also do not pose a threat to NATO countries, in particular Poland and the Baltic states, since Russian AK-74 are not technically capable of killing NATO soldiers. It's all against Somali pirates
    8. Ros 56
      Ros 56 17 June 2016 14: 33
      +1
      Quote: Sharky
      You can already remove the noodles from your ears or wait until it cools down.


      Do not allow yourself to hang on her ears. And you can already shoot, it’s cool. negative
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 17 June 2016 10: 04
    +13
    NATO tried to "disprove 5 Russian myths" about the alliance

    The trouble with the United States and, naturally, NATO is that the Americans still live and are guided only by their own concepts of the international situation. Therefore, they are trying to challenge the axiom, which according to mathematical laws does not require proof. But the American axiom has a second option. I won’t be surprised if I hear that the Sun revolves around America.
    1. weksha50
      weksha50 17 June 2016 12: 17
      +1
      Quote: rotmistr60
      I won’t be surprised if I hear that the Sun revolves around America.



      Um ... If you arrange such a survey among not only schoolchildren, but also adult Americans, I would not be surprised if such answers appear ...

      The axiom for them is "America above all else", and therefore, whatever she does is right ...
  4. evil partisan
    evil partisan 17 June 2016 10: 05
    +7
    And whom do they want to ... deceive, in general? fool
    1. 0255
      0255 17 June 2016 10: 52
      +3
      Quote: wicked partisan
      And whom do they want to ... deceive, in general? fool

      someone-citizens of NATO countries. In the West they believe such articles
  5. A-Sim
    A-Sim 17 June 2016 10: 05
    +2
    Through the looking glass, only glass between media is integrated; everything else is different.
  6. Andrey K
    Andrey K 17 June 2016 10: 06
    +7
    Judging by how NATO refutes myths about itself - NATO itself is a myth request
    He's not around request
    It's just a bunch of crazy ones rummaging along the borders with the Russian Federation, they escaped from the asylumwassat
  7. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 17 June 2016 10: 06
    +6
    Where were my eyes? Russia approached the borders of NATO, and only then it became clear what peaceful and fluffy people it was.

    These are not people, not men and not women, something in between - homosexuals are bad.
  8. Yarik76
    Yarik76 17 June 2016 10: 07
    +6
    The logic of a five-year-old child, they completely degraded in NATA!
  9. volodya
    volodya 17 June 2016 10: 08
    +26
    Again, everything is upside down! Dermocrats!
    1. gray smeet
      gray smeet 17 June 2016 10: 23
      +11
      You can forget about Cuba. And Venezuela too ... Who else is there in our "friends"? The Coca King? The Argentinean was changed, the Brazilian was changed. The States put "order" in the backyard. Like this...
      1. vovanpain
        vovanpain 17 June 2016 10: 33
        +17
        Quote: gray smeet
        You can forget about Cuba. And Venezuela too ... Who else is there in our "friends"? The Coca King? Like this.

        We will forget it, only you are a colleague, how the patient’s tooth aches and achs, minus my thought is not correct for the comment, it’s the right thought, but for the whining. yesI apologize if I offended.
        1. gray smeet
          gray smeet 17 June 2016 10: 38
          +6
          Quote: vovanpain
          Quote: gray smeet
          You can forget about Cuba. And Venezuela too ... Who else is there in our "friends"? The Coca King? Like this.

          We will forget it, only you are a colleague, how the patient’s tooth aches and achs, minus my thought is not correct for the comment, it’s the right thought, but for the whining. yesI apologize if I offended.

          Yes, I'm not offended. Tired of bravado inappropriate, but to someone it is like a balm for the soul. If people like me will not whine - you yourself will bark, sooner or later, because the site will slide into stupid - Hurray! hi And it’s strange, you yourself feel that I’m saying real things, but you continue to run in the crowd - it’s easier to live like that, and now they’ll give you pluses on the site fellow . I’m not minus you - I’m not minus your opponents in the discussion.
          1. vovanpain
            vovanpain 17 June 2016 10: 53
            +11
            Quote: gray smeet
            If people like me won't whine

            Colleague, let's not whine, let's just constructively criticize. hi drinks When only one black thing is seen, it will not be possible to notice something good, but you need to point out the shortcomings and reality, not how you yourself noticed:
            Quote: gray smeet
            because the site will slide into stupid - Hurray!

            Quote: gray smeet
            continue to run in the crowd - it’s easier to live like that, and on the site they will also instruct the pluses.

            And my colleague is pluses on the side, because you, I and many other forum users are on the site not because of the pluses, but for reading the news, discussing it. With respect. hi
            1. gray smeet
              gray smeet 17 June 2016 11: 05
              +1
              Well, let's not whine, where is the line between constructive criticism and whining and who will be the arbiter? C'mon, that’s how I am ... I don’t want to discuss about whining and criticism. hi
            2. rotmistr60
              rotmistr60 17 June 2016 11: 19
              +4
              you, I and many other forum users are on the site not because of the pluses, but for reading the news, discussing it.

              Totally agree with you. Yes, some have already launched a nuclear strike or sank a couple of American aircraft carriers, but they are not the ones who paint the main picture on the site. But for those who "everything is gone and it's time to give up" the attitude should be appropriate. hi
              1. gray smeet
                gray smeet 17 June 2016 11: 34
                0
                Quote: rotmistr60
                But for those who "everything is gone and it's time to give up" the attitude should be appropriate. hi


                Me mean? crying If I - I will somehow withstand your appropriate attitude. By the way, where did I write that everything was lost and it's time to give up? I understand you .., flattering nonsense is always more pleasant to read than to face the truth, this is not given to everyone. (Probably this is the notorious "everything is gone and it's time to give up").

                Quote: rotmistr60
                Yes, some have already dealt a nuclear strike or sank a couple of American aircraft carriers, but they do not paint the main picture on the site. hi


                If you look at the number of pluses from a friend volodya RU Today, 10:08 - who determines the picture on this site? Answer Why this stupid picture? And why is there so many positive feedback on it?

                1. gray smeet
                  gray smeet 17 June 2016 11: 59
                  -1
                  Turned the VO site into another Trinixi, a chipnet and the like ... We look at the number + !!!!! here for this picture:



                  Do you guys have few entertainment sites?
                2. rotmistr60
                  rotmistr60 17 June 2016 12: 08
                  +1
                  For gray smeet
                  Me mean?

                  If I meant you, I would directly write.
                  Regarding the responses - there are a lot of young people on the site who think that if you put up the United States, then you will grab the pluses unnecessarily.
                  1. gray smeet
                    gray smeet 17 June 2016 12: 23
                    +1
                    Quote: rotmistr60

                    Regarding the responses - there are a lot of young people on the site who think that if you put up the United States, then you will grab the pluses unnecessarily.


                    Because from me so much "whining" hi
                    And from me to your table - drinks (although I do not use lol ) and also from me + for the last comment
                    1. rotmistr60
                      rotmistr60 18 June 2016 00: 54
                      0
                      Thanks and mutually drinks hi
                3. volodya
                  volodya 17 June 2016 13: 13
                  +1
                  Quote: gray smeet
                  Quote: rotmistr60
                  But for those who "everything is gone and it's time to give up" the attitude should be appropriate. hi


                  Me mean? crying If I - I will somehow withstand your appropriate attitude. By the way, where did I write that everything was lost and it's time to give up? I understand you .., flattering nonsense is always more pleasant to read than to face the truth, this is not given to everyone. (Probably this is the notorious "everything is gone and it's time to give up").

                  Quote: rotmistr60
                  Yes, some have already dealt a nuclear strike or sank a couple of American aircraft carriers, but they do not paint the main picture on the site. hi


                  If you look at the number of pluses from a friend volodya RU Today, 10:08 - who determines the picture on this site? Answer Why this stupid picture? And why is there so many positive feedback on it?

                  The picture is not stupid, it makes you think what would happen if we climbed to their borders with the same speed.
                  1. gray smeet
                    gray smeet 17 June 2016 13: 24
                    0
                    Quote: volodya

                    The picture is not stupid, it makes you think what would happen if we climbed to their borders with the same speed.


                    Do not be offended, I commented on your address only at the very beginning of this discussion and no more. All the rest of my comments concern you as an example only. And as for the picture - the picture is stupid both in meaning and content (I can decipher what I say so). She does not force to think at all, but a large number of people lead to ecstasy .. with which I congratulate you.
  10. Baloo
    Baloo 17 June 2016 10: 09
    +2
    It would be April 1. would have laughed. And so. typical for phashingtonized macaque macaques psaking macaque - demagogy facing. Dovy ... uh ... are reappearing, again the Cossacks will walk in Paris, Brussels and further on the list of geyropolits. Fashington? And who will need a nuclear desert?
    1. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch 17 June 2016 10: 32
      0
      Quote: Balu
      Fashington? And who will need a nuclear desert?


      The strait there will be between Mexico and Canada. Named after Kurchatov.
      1. Baloo
        Baloo 17 June 2016 10: 57
        +1
        The strait there will be between Mexico and Canada. Named after Kurchatov.
        Support. laughing drinks
  11. Alexander Romanov
    Alexander Romanov 17 June 2016 10: 10
    +4
    “NATO enlargement has contributed to the spread of democracy, security and stability throughout Europe.”
    Ohren, it’s possible how safe this world has become. And the spread of democracy reminds me of an epidemic of syphilis.
  12. gla172
    gla172 17 June 2016 10: 15
    +18
    Well, something like this...
  13. Pinkie F.
    Pinkie F. 17 June 2016 10: 17
    +5
    Well, now everything is clear and intelligible. And in general, NATO is not at all a military-political bloc, as the Kremlin mistakenly believes. This is a scout organization.
  14. Sergey-8848
    Sergey-8848 17 June 2016 10: 20
    0
    Somehow, without a spark, these nonsense, and already become boring, although you can’t say that in NATO "... there are few real violent, so there are no leaders ...". Just taking into account the neophytes of storytellers there in abundance. So - you give new inventions about the exceptional peacefulness of the alliance!
  15. Dreiko11
    Dreiko11 17 June 2016 10: 21
    0
    laughing I beg you that their location is exactly the opposite of their version of Iranian missiles
  16. Prisoner
    Prisoner 17 June 2016 10: 21
    0
    What are they? Have you decided to lull the bear? All the jackals, late. There was no need to stomp loudly either in Iran or in Libya, and even more so in Yugoslavia.
  17. 33 Watcher
    33 Watcher 17 June 2016 10: 25
    +1
    Well, in general, nothing new, everything is also primitive, wretched tracking. Is that all rebuttal?
    We disagree, nothing interesting ... No.
  18. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 17 June 2016 10: 25
    +5
    “NATO enlargement has contributed to the spread of democracy, security and stability throughout Europe.”
  19. vanavatny
    vanavatny 17 June 2016 10: 26
    +2
    I didn’t understand from the article, for whom are these refutations? Who can I satiate to calm down? Well, I’m glad for Iran: the Persians again learned about the successes of their military industrial complex - but from the cellar
  20. Corsair0304
    Corsair0304 17 June 2016 10: 27
    +5
    Psaka nervously smokes on the sidelines. Stoltenberg did it!
    1. Baloo
      Baloo 17 June 2016 10: 59
      +1
      Add pzhalsta: the United States invented the world's first wheel, a triangular. laughing
    2. Weyland
      Weyland 17 June 2016 23: 35
      0
      As for the vandals, it’s weak somehow ... There wouldn’t be a straight cut that the vandals are Russians!
      Vandals aka Wendels, Wends, Wends ... Hint: Russian will be in Finnish "venelainen ".
      Only about vandalism ... The state of the vandals was on the territory of today's Tunisia, where they got acquainted with the history of the region and attacked Rome with a cry: "avenge Carthage! ". So, if we compare the results of the activities of civilized Romans in the Carthaginian region with the activities of the vandals, it would be more appropriate to call vandalism" Romanism "!
  21. Eustace
    Eustace 17 June 2016 10: 29
    +2
    “NATO enlargement has contributed to the spread of democracy, security and stability throughout Europe.”

    They would have told the bombed Serbs about this. soldier
  22. Koresh
    Koresh 17 June 2016 10: 30
    +1
    If the European missile defense system is against Iran, then it can place a missile defense system near that very Iran? According to the teachings, have you seen the scripts that you write there for maneuvers, Tom Clainsey himself wrote everything for you (rest in peace to him)? The deployment of military bases and the strengthening of military units in eastern Europe to repel the “Russian threat”?
  23. Taygerus
    Taygerus 17 June 2016 10: 37
    0
    here are storytellers, they just have to write a new book about Gary Potter fool
  24. semuil
    semuil 17 June 2016 10: 38
    +1
    What their democracy is more like fascism. Even worse.
    1. Prisoner
      Prisoner 17 June 2016 22: 48
      0
      This is fascism. And nothing could be worse.
  25. japs
    japs 17 June 2016 10: 44
    +3
    Is it necessary to respond to the nonsense of the alliance press service? It is necessary, but popular wisdom says that attack is the best defense. It seems to me that our actions in this regard are too timid and are designed for smart people. Such in the geyrop with Diogenes.
  26. Hariton laptev
    Hariton laptev 17 June 2016 10: 46
    +1
    Standing on the threshold of the goat’s house, the wolf told the kids that he was kind and good and that he would only pet the kids on the heads. How the fairy tale ended everyone knows. Do not believe those who have been caught lying more than once.
  27. Bratan
    Bratan 17 June 2016 10: 46
    +1
    they at least ssy in the eye, but they say that God's dew. rams
  28. beer-youk
    beer-youk 17 June 2016 10: 54
    0
    Quote: Militon
    We are considered completely stupid?


    "Considering yourself smarter than others is guaranteed to be a fool!"
    Some of the great ones, unfortunately, do not remember exactly who.
  29. Oznob
    Oznob 17 June 2016 10: 58
    +5
    After reading the text from NATO, the feeling is like a kote .... yes.
  30. Altona
    Altona 17 June 2016 11: 01
    +10
    I read five crazy delusions about the role of NATO. Now there are five theses, for what does NATO need all the same:
    1) NATO is an instrument of global military containment of strong players on the world stage, in this case, primarily Russia;
    2) the NATO-system of occupation of countries included in it by deploying American military bases there;
    3) NATO is a military organization designed to consume weapons produced primarily by the US military-industrial complex;
    4) NATO is not a defensive alliance, but an aggressively offensive one. The list of countries affected by NATO aggression is quite extensive and is constantly updated.
    5) NATO is an instrument of intimidation, as well as an instrument of pseudo-collective security, thanks to the notorious fifth paragraph. In fact, this is an organization of countries that have recognized the absolute dictates of the United States in the military, diplomatic and many other areas.
    1. Mikhail Krapivin
      Mikhail Krapivin 17 June 2016 23: 41
      0
      Perfectly worded - short, concise and to the point. Bravo.
  31. Wolka
    Wolka 17 June 2016 11: 33
    0
    already pretty stinks of this NATO ...
  32. Darkoff
    Darkoff 17 June 2016 11: 41
    +1
    A sluggish "debunking" came from the fact that it was a forced formality. Checkbox for reporting. And not at all in front of us, but in front of ourselves, more precisely, in front of our electorate.
    I want to believe that the bulk of the well-fed and contented life of Western society is peaceful enough for the leadership of their countries to feel the need to justify themselves to their citizens for their unfriendly actions.
  33. pafegosoff
    pafegosoff 17 June 2016 11: 51
    +2
    It is believed that NATO members, with the exception of the United States, suck, needed only to legitimize US military-political crimes. Everything else is really myths.
    Even the famous "independent", "neutral" Switzerland is 80% dependent on America (the same vaunted "secret of deposits" split under pressure from overseas).
    How many did they name the land borders with Russia at NATO? 1215 km?
    How much was it? From a force of 150 km from Rybachy to the border with Finland near Zapolyarny. That is, a 10-fold increase in land borders with US troops is not considered. Now, if Belarus, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Mongolia and China join NATO, then you can start to worry ... An invasion through a narrow gate 1200 km wide is what? There the tank will not pass. It’s better not to talk about the sea. It is peaceful ... And only Russian planes plow the sea, scaring peaceful gulls that poop on Polish-American sailors ...
    Why did they need to once again drag in an already obedient European zombie that he is not able to digest the brain, which was shrunk from tolerance ...
  34. olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 17 June 2016 11: 59
    +2
    To the paragraph "the alliance has suspended" practical interaction with Moscow "because of its aggressive actions in Ukraine.
    On the next branch, an article about the situation in the Donbass from the MAG military commissar
    ... "Gorlovka, Makeyevka and the northern regions of Donetsk were heavily shelled on the night of 8-9. As it turned out later, the reason for these attacks on peaceful quarters of our cities was an attempt to demonstrate the capabilities of American radar systems for targeting artillery that entered service with the Armed Forces. them, AN-TPQ-48 and AN-TPQ-36, were just deployed on the night of June 9.

    The work of the complexes was observed by a delegation of the military from the United States who arrived in Avdiivka. The delegation was headed by the military attaché Colonel M. Van Delviche and his assistant E. Self. There were also representatives of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, coordinating the shelling. As a result of these attacks, two people were killed and another 24 were injured, incl. child under 3 years old "
    Testing in the residential areas of the supplied weapons under the supervision of Western instructors is, according to NATO, a humanitarian action !!!!
    Aggression surpasses those who are experiencing accuracy in residential neighborhoods.
    All statements of the West are a cynical lie.
  35. weksha50
    weksha50 17 June 2016 12: 00
    0
    "Refuting Moscow's statement that NATO is trying to encircle Russia, Western analysts give the following argument:" The length of Russia's common border with the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance is 1215 km, while the entire length of the state's land border exceeds 20 thousand km. " Apparently, these figures should indicate that the environment of the Russian Federation is physically impossible"...

    Some kind of childish statement ... Like the following ...

    Only these "children" are not childishly spiteful and aggressive, unlike the "main aggressor" - Russia ...
  36. 96423lom
    96423lom 17 June 2016 12: 01
    +1
    With NATO, soon intelligence will not be needed - he listened and it is clear what they are going to do.
  37. ARES623
    ARES623 17 June 2016 13: 16
    0
    Someone said that the mind can not understand Russia. And I think that the mind and Europe is not easy to understand. One shabby general by the name of Guderian, in his memoirs, boasted of his know-how - before entering his tanks in Austria, he decorated them with flowers so that the Austrians could see that German tanks were entering their territory with friendly, peaceful purposes. So, on the tank and for peaceful purposes. So understand them ...
  38. mamont5
    mamont5 17 June 2016 13: 57
    0
    "The length of Russia's common border with the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance is 1215 km, while the entire length of the state's land border exceeds 20 thousand km." Apparently, these figures should indicate that the encirclement of the Russian Federation is physically impossible. "

    Naturally impossible, but ... they always try to do this.
  39. Ros 56
    Ros 56 17 June 2016 14: 38
    0
    As I understand it, the entire NATO leadership decided to replace the one and only Jen Psaki during maternity leave. Well done Jen, they don’t even succeed. Hence the conclusion - idiots.
  40. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 17 June 2016 14: 49
    0
    They are "exceptional", they cannot even imagine that our people are not made according to their patterns. And even children will not believe in such frank, delusional stupidity fool , and also laugh lol ! But, for the average Western public, this insanity will come down.
  41. BastaKarapuzik And
    BastaKarapuzik And 17 June 2016 20: 21
    0
    Yeah, he and Psaki obviously have one writer.

    1) What should be meant by surroundings? It is not necessary for the environment to drive round dances around a potential adversary, as in a children's party. So the extent of the borders has nothing to do with it.

    2)"the alliance simply suspended "practical interaction with Moscow".
    -US President, Barack Obama boasted that he had torn the Russian economy to shreds, declared Russia one of the main threats, along with Ebola, but it turns out that they did not mean anything bad.

    3)"European missile defense has never been directed against the Russian Federation".
    -First, lies, and secondly, their promises to believe ... The Alliance also should not have expanded.

    4)"technically incapable of intercepting Russian missiles"
    -But it is capable of acting as a weapon of "global strike".

    5) "this is the right of sovereign European states"
    -Yes, there is such a right. But the exercises in question are not conducted by these states, since some of them and military equipment have a "cat cried", but are carried out on the territory provided by them for "lease". When Cuba, by sovereign law, leased its territory, I remember, there was a scandal that almost led to the third world war. Looks like the rulers of the United States at that time were completely bad, they did not understand that the potential threat from real missiles is, in fact myth.
  42. tolmachiev51
    tolmachiev51 18 June 2016 04: 06
    0
    There is no single answer - where and when and who did Russia attack in Europe !!! ??? I wonder what NATO will do if the capital is transferred to Vladivostok ??? with whose "missiles" will they "fight"? - although the "regional committee" will come up with.