In the Gomel region (Belarus) tested MLRS "Polonaise"

73
In Belarus, the first successful tests of the Polonaise multiple rocket launcher system were carried out. This was stated by President of the Republic of Belarus Alexander Lukashenko during a working meeting with a number of Belarusian officials. The meeting was attended by Prime Minister Andrei Kobyakov and Chairman of the Board of the National Bank Pavel Kallaur. It is reported by the news agency BelTA.

From the statement of the head of Belarus:
I lingered a little. We have a happy day today in terms of security and defense. Our military man managed to develop and test the missile weapons created in Belarus today for the meager money they were given. Launched rocket complexes. The tests were very successful. The missiles hit the target in one and a half meters (talking about accuracy - note "IN") literally from the set targets - the first volley. The second volley is literally ten meters away. It's perfect. These are rocket complexes that have been created in Belarus for two years.


In the Gomel region (Belarus) tested MLRS "Polonaise"


Alexander Lukashenko instructed the head of the government of the Republic of Belarus to submit all system developers to state awards.

Shooting was carried out on the territory of the Gomel region by calculations of the rocket troops and artillery of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus as part of military tests. This is the first time conducted combat launches MLRS "Polonez". Starts by the military were recognized as successful.

Video published by the TV channel VoenTV on YouTube:



Read all the details about the MLRS "Polonez" on our website - link.
73 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. The comment was deleted.
    1. -22
      16 June 2016 15: 54
      The fact that the rocket took off is, as "Blotter" said: "And I can do that!", But where she got and what he did on the ground - you can't see! Conclusion: either flew not far away (according to Lukashenka - by 1,5 meters, or vice versa - very far away (again, according to Lukashenka - by 10 meters)!
      1. +16
        16 June 2016 16: 00
        Do not worry, on earth it (the rocket) will do everything right. And meters are a distance from given points on the field.
        1. +3
          16 June 2016 16: 32
          "Point" is the key word here. Which, however, does not at all implore Belarus.
        2. +5
          16 June 2016 16: 47
          the range for which you tested, you can find out? I live in Gomel and do not know what kind of melting shot
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +20
        16 June 2016 16: 16
        in general, Belarusians with a sense of humor, because POLONEZ is a Polish dance, so don’t dance music for you already.
        1. +1
          16 June 2016 16: 55
          And what Belarus did not enter into the Commonwealth speech?
          And Oginsky is from Belarus
          1. +27
            16 June 2016 17: 03
            Quote: Lex.
            And what Belarus did not enter into the Commonwealth speech?
            And Oginsky is from Belarus

            Commonwealth is not Poland negative, and a federation of two monarchies - the kingdom of Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. A polonaise is a purely Polish dance, while Oginsky is the author of only one of the many Polonez, the truth of the most famous. In addition to this polonaise, almost no one knows any other works by this composer.
            In Soviet times, even a comic poll was conducted - I saw it on TV:
            -What polonaise can you name?
            -Oginsky polonaise!
            -What work of composer Oginsky do you know?
            - Polonaise!
            bully
            1. +5
              16 June 2016 18: 57
              Quote: andj61
              -What work of composer Oginsky do you know?
              - Polonaise!

              Andrei, a colleague, rarely comment on comments, but yours is very literate and fun at the same time. good
            2. 0
              17 June 2016 00: 44
              I hasten to remind you that the territory of Belarus, together with its people, was part of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, so we can say that it was part of the RP as well. The person above did not mean Belarus as an independent state at that time. And on the basis of the fact that Oginsky was from our land and is the author of the most famous (as you said) polonaise, that is why they called it that. Therefore, your commentator's "corrections" above are a little out of place. All the best.
              1. +2
                17 June 2016 08: 14
                Quote: TheLine
                I hasten to remind that the territory of Belarus, together with its people, was part of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, therefore it can be said that it was part of the Republic of Poland in the same way. The man above did not mean Belarus as an independent state for that period of time. And on the basis that Oginsky was a native of our land and is the author of the most famous (as you said) polonaise, that's why they called it.

                I dare to disagree with you! Polonaise is a dance such as Cracow, Polka, Mazurka - if we mention the Polish. Naturally, music for him, as well as for others, can be written by composers of ANY nationality. About which I noted in my comment. And Lex wrote that since Belarus was part of the Speech, it means that Belarus is also related to the Polish dance of polonaise, since Oginsky is from Belarus. A third of Poland was part of the Russian Empire, but this does not mean that the polonaise is a Russian dance! And the music for this dance, as well as for polka, mazurka - was written by composers of different nationalities.
          2. +8
            16 June 2016 17: 39
            This pshetia came in, so everything is correct, a slight irony over the Poles. :)
          3. 0
            16 June 2016 20: 01
            Quote: Lex.
            Dila to the Commonwealth?
            And Oginsky is from Belarus

            In general, the Commonwealth is a confederation.
            And Oginsky was born in Minsk Mazowiecki, it is near Warsaw. That is, a Pole, although this did not prevent him from becoming a senator of the Russian Empire over time.
          4. 0
            17 June 2016 06: 33
            Belarus was part of the Soviet Union, even earlier there were provinces of the Russian Empire, and even earlier it was a misunderstanding (I mean the situation, not the state).
          5. 0
            19 June 2016 16: 15
            For example, you can climb down from the ceiling. And "From Belarus" is not allowed. Teach great and mighty Israel!
        2. +1
          16 June 2016 16: 55
          And what Belarus did not enter into the Commonwealth speech?
          And Oginsky is from Belarus
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. +2
          16 June 2016 18: 57
          Polonaise Lukashenko - a surprise for the Poles. laughing Agin crying crying
      4. +5
        16 June 2016 16: 49
        Well, the good fellows Belarusians hurried in advance, together with the Chinese they created a missile system. By the way, not Belarusians, not Chinese, not Europeans, are not limited in the creation of medium-range missiles, unlike us. According to the idea, these missiles should seem to fly almost 600-700 km. And how good they are, time and the market will show. Today the buyer is finicky and will not buy a frank "g".
      5. +4
        16 June 2016 17: 01
        For the meager money that they were given, our military managed to develop and test the missile weapons created in Belarus today.

        Why shouldn't Belarus "develop" medium-range missiles?
        Or did they sign the INF Treaty?
        1. +4
          16 June 2016 17: 42
          Given that WHAT was produced by the BSSR in Soviet times, then everything is possible. It is a pity many plants are closed, but there is potential.
        2. +2
          16 June 2016 18: 28
          Quote: Starover_Z
          Why shouldn't Belarus "develop" medium-range missiles?

          And where does it say that Belarusian missiles? It seems that we were talking about the Chinese A200 all the time of development. Launcher, yes, Belarusian.
        3. +2
          17 June 2016 08: 36
          Exactly! Therefore, we should wait for the continuation: complexes "Mazurka", "Krakowiak", "Polka". and the Lyavonikha intercontinental missile system
      6. 0
        16 June 2016 19: 04
        Some contradictory information about this MLRS: somewhere they write that the missiles are Chinese, and somewhere that it is a modified "Smerch"
      7. 0
        17 June 2016 06: 31
        Well, the fact that she did not fall into the noble Poles is a fact .. Immediately the yapping would have started. But the brains of the "partners" WERE BLASTED ..
  2. +10
    16 June 2016 15: 53
    Good weapons will never hinder our allies and relatives .... NATO at the border ..... already
    1. 0
      16 June 2016 16: 47
      Quote: Alexey-74
      A good weapon never hurts

      do not forget how the Old Man sells everything to Ukraine that brings currency .... he sends mazy there ....
      1. +2
        16 June 2016 16: 56
        Quote: gispanec
        do not forget how the Old Man sells everything to Ukraine that brings currency .... he sends mazy there ....

        But in everything, they bite and bite ... The Turchynov wondered about the lack of ammunition, although in Ukraine they were stockpiled for three world wars. Well, what a national tradition!
      2. +2
        16 June 2016 17: 44
        Firstly, a link to this fact, and not rehash from hohlosites and pseudo-patriotic resources such as politicus :), and secondly, who supplied the engines to the tanks?
        In any case, the wind of Wentorg will bring everything to where it is needed.
        1. 0
          16 June 2016 22: 51
          Quote: Dr. Sorge
          rehash from hohlosites and pseudo-patriotic resources

          don’t take me by the nerves ... you yourself can boast of this?

          watch the broom of your prezik ... yes yes the broom .... he kisses the gums with powder .. and behaves like the last (something that does not sink) with respect to Russia .... the powder does not pretend at least ... and Old Man will come out to us sideways ...
  3. +5
    16 June 2016 15: 55
    Sorry TTX no, range, warhead mass, caliber
    1. 0
      17 June 2016 12: 43
      And the above video is not successful ... It was said about the salvo in the message, the video only 1 launch, without firing results. I don’t really doubt the combat readiness of this MLRS, but was it really so difficult to shoot a volley, and the results of the hit ?!
      Good day!
  4. 0
    16 June 2016 15: 55
    If there is duplication in the field of arms development, then this is not good.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. -2
    16 June 2016 15: 57
    Well done neighbors! There is still gunpowder in the powder flasks and ... everything else that is supposed to be.
  7. +2
    16 June 2016 16: 00
    Arm yourself to health! And then already somehow it got enough for free to supply Russian!
    1. +2
      16 June 2016 17: 46
      Sowing enmity? Change the training manual. These quotes two years ago are already outdated :)
      1. +5
        17 June 2016 09: 28
        Troll minus members only confirmed the hostility crops :)
  8. +3
    16 June 2016 16: 03
    Old Man Beauty. He is such a handsome man that I won’t be surprised if Polones appears in the Donbas at the valiant APU .... Old Man from such an ally, he can
    1. +1
      16 June 2016 21: 40
      I don’t think that the Old Man will take so much into account, the supply of vehicles is one thing, but the supply of lethal weapons, it is another ... as well as on credit to Ukraine they will not be sold.
  9. +7
    16 June 2016 16: 04
    Like "Polonaise" on May 9, 2015 at the parade in Minsk was shown. And the rocket there seems to be really Chinese.
    "... Recently, the Chinese defense industry has been actively promoting the new A200 missile on the international market. This product was developed by CALT (China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology) and is designed to deliver high-precision strikes against enemy targets at ranges up to 200 km.
    There are some technical characteristics of the rocket A200. This product has a 301 mm case diameter (slightly larger than the “Soviet” 300 mm caliber used by the Smerch MLRS) and a total length of about 7,26 m. In the middle and tail parts of the rocket cylindrical case, stabilizers and steering wheels are deployed. After opening, the tail X-shaped planes have a span of 615 mm. The launch weight of the rocket is about 750 kg and probably depends on the type of warhead.


    http://topwar.ru/74920-reaktivnaya-sistema-zalpovogo-ognya-polonez-respublika-be
    larus.html
    1. +2
      16 June 2016 16: 20
      Like "Polonaise" on May 9, 2015 at the parade in Minsk was shown. And the rocket there seems to be really Chinese.
    2. +2
      16 June 2016 17: 49
      The Iskanders were exactly but maybe in 2014 ?, but I don’t remember these, I probably looked through :)
  10. +2
    16 June 2016 16: 10
    Well done brothers! Keep it up!
    1. +2
      16 June 2016 17: 49
      Eka in, minus you, well, things ... :) Catch compensation +
  11. +4
    16 June 2016 16: 15
    The new Belarusian multiple launch rocket system "Polonaise" is of great interest for a number of reasons. Firstly, the Belarusian industry has not yet created weapons with such high characteristics. The second reason is high performance. Currently, only a few countries are developing MLRS projects with missiles capable of flying at a range of up to 200 km.

    This is if you click on the link at the end of the article.
    200km. just great. If necessary, you can fry the NATO gadyushnik in "sprotland". smile
    1. +4
      16 June 2016 16: 52
      They’ve already done a kind of cruise missile for 500 km, but you can increase the range, they seem to have no obligations about the Russian Railways
    2. +3
      16 June 2016 16: 52
      They’ve already done a kind of cruise missile for 500 km, but you can increase the range, they seem to have no obligations about the Russian Railways
      1. 0
        16 June 2016 17: 04
        Quote: Lex.
        They’ve already done a kind of cruise missile for 500 km, but you can increase the range, they seem to have no obligations about the Russian Railways

        good
      2. +3
        16 June 2016 17: 52
        In the USSR, much more was done. And what satellites are ...
    3. +2
      16 June 2016 17: 51
      And once cruise missiles also made laser weapons. Everything can be revived, the main thing is to set a goal. :)
      1. 0
        16 June 2016 18: 29
        "Everything can be revived, the main thing is to set a goal" - But without state funding, this will remain a goal.
  12. +1
    16 June 2016 16: 23
    Ours were going to do something similar from "Tornado". Range of about 120 km with individual guidance.
    1. +4
      16 June 2016 16: 29
      Gathered and done, Tornado-S, called ...
  13. 0
    16 June 2016 16: 23
    For a start, they could make a rocket in cooperation with us! Now they just need to create their own rocket for this launcher!
    1. +2
      16 June 2016 16: 44
      Surely there was a very close cooperation with China and as in my opinion, if the Russian Federation was present, then it is on a very small scale.
      1. 0
        16 June 2016 20: 49
        Quote: Belarus
        if the Russian Federation was present, then very on a small scale.

        And why the Russian Federation was present in this, no one invited us there, because "father" muddied this crap with the Chinese against Russia, out of fear after the Crimea.
    2. 0
      16 June 2016 16: 53
      Made in.
      we have about 3 years this Salanese procrastinate, but what's the point?
      I think: either show (tell) at least some Belarusian developments or it’s better to keep silent and don’t PR.
      1. -3
        16 June 2016 19: 05
        Quote: bearded
        I think: either show (tell) at least some Belarusian developments or it’s better to keep silent and don’t PR.

        I think: either strain the remaining brains and press a couple of buttons on the clave to at least get this: http://www.belarus.by/en/business/business-news/belorusskie-predprijatija-pokazh
        ut-novejshie-military-razrabotki-na-vystavke-kadex-2016-v-kazaxstane_i_0000039986
        .html
        or it is stupid not to PR, posing as a "fighter for the people's cause" fool
        1. +1
          16 June 2016 20: 16
          Quote: SMikhalych
          I think: either strain your remaining brains and press a couple of buttons on the clave to at least get this - //www.belarus.by/en/business/business-news/belorusskie-predprijatija-pokazhut-no
          vejshie-military-razrabotki-na-vystavke-kadex-2016-v-kazaxstane_i_0000039986.html
          or it is stupid not to PR, posing as a "fighter for the people's cause"

          What are you boasting about? Did you manage to visit this site yourself?
          The total area of ​​the joint stand of Belarusian enterprises will be 120 sq.m. It will present the latest defense technologies and capabilities of the Belarusian military-industrial complex in the creation of integrated automated control systems for troops of various levels, solutions to counteract anti-droning systems, domestic technologies for the production of aircraft and elements of unmanned systems, Belarusian projects for the modernization of air defense systems, armored vehicles and aircraft, as well as advanced developments in the field of modern optical and optical-electronic instrumentation.
          Read more: http://www.belta.by/society/view/belorusskie-predprijatija-pokazhut-novejshie-vo
          ennye-razrabotki-na-vystavke-kadex-2016-v-kazahstane-194099-2016 /
          For any use of materials, an active hyperlink to belta.by is required

          If you don’t understand then I’m translating it.
          At 120 m, only models can be placed, and nothing can be shown at all.
        2. +1
          16 June 2016 20: 37
          I think: behave more restrained.
          question: whose rocket is palanese? you know how the start and katyusha fit (shoot).
          barmaley with Toyota shoot.
          what releases RB I know.
          sorry that briefly and abbreviatedly, I am writing from the screen keyboard, I drank the old tea)
  14. +1
    16 June 2016 16: 49
    http://www.belta.by/president/view/novoe-raketnoe-vooruzhenie-uspeshno-ispytali-
    v-belarusi-197711-2016 /
  15. +5
    16 June 2016 18: 59
    The adoption of the Polonaise multiple launch rocket systems in the Belarusian army in 2016, as recently announced by the Minister of Defense, Lieutenant-General Andrei Ravkov, may remove from the agenda the acquisition of Iskander-E Russian tactical missile systems (declared range - to 280 km).
    For the first time, a new domestic development - the Polonaise multiple launch rocket system - was shown on May 9 at the parade in Minsk. Its officially declared tactical and technical characteristics - firing range of more than 200 km and the ability to simultaneously deliver precision strikes on eight targets - allowed most Belarusian and Russian experts to assume that this MLRS is very similar to the Chinese model - NORINCO AR3. It should be noted that Belarus has a very high degree of localization and, most likely, almost all components of the new MLRS, including an automated fire control system, will be produced in the country. However, what is not a secret, missile production in Belarus is absent. Therefore, it is highly likely that missiles for the Belarusian Polonaise will be purchased in China (the possibility of supplying part of the ammunition for the MLRS through free financial assistance is not ruled out).
    Although it is not entirely correct to directly compare Polonaise and Iskander-E - different missiles, guidance systems and warheads - it’s worth noting that for a hypothetical European theater of operations, Belarusian MLRS can be put on a par with Russian OTRKs. Moreover, the capabilities of these systems can mutually complement each other in fulfilling the tasks of integrated fire destruction, both according to the defense plan of the Republic of Belarus and in the interests of Russia neutralizing Euro-missile defense facilities.
    PS By the way, the Yavorsky training ground (Ukraine), where US troops are developing a new bridgehead under the guise of training their Ukrainian colleagues in the basics of military art, also falls into the affected zone of the Belarusian MLRS Polonaise

    http://geo-politica.info/dlinnaya-ruka-belarusi-chto-mogut-porazit-polonezy.html
    1. +3
      16 June 2016 20: 51
      Well, they already produce the rockets themselves Lukashenko personally examined. While they can’t buy the engine and fuel, China
    2. The comment was deleted.
  16. +1
    16 June 2016 20: 40
    I don’t know, I don’t know ... What did Batko Lukashenko think about when he was hiding under a Chinese missile ... To have his own platform for launch, but to depend on deliveries of missiles from a country with which, in addition to this treaty, nothing is connected ... how- it is detrimental to the security of the country. We won with the Chinese and managed to make friends and fight and make friends again in a relatively short period of time. At least Russia will never throw Belarus in terms of armaments, but here ... Life is a complicated thing, and the east is a delicate matter.
    1. +2
      16 June 2016 20: 57
      in the event of an aggravation of the situation with missiles, we will act according to the established scheme: we fall asleep gunpowder, ram the wad, roll up the stone core and there will be a complete fuck ... rez. (humor).
      I agree with your post, and components are far away.
    2. 0
      17 June 2016 09: 25
      Quote: Corsair0304
      What did Batko Lukashenko think about when he was hiding under a Chinese rocket ...

      Out of habit. Already accustomed to Chinese junk to buy.
  17. 0
    16 June 2016 21: 34
    Competitors etit ... but I'm happy for them))
  18. +1
    16 June 2016 21: 56
    From a conversation at the ball: "We are waiting for the Mazurka".
  19. +3
    16 June 2016 23: 19
    Well, let's say this ...
    make a few starts is one thing
    but to put production on stream is quite another ...
    So I wouldn’t be too happy.
  20. +1
    17 June 2016 03: 34
    The manufacture of their weapons is the key to the security of the frontal state! So that good

    PS they brought me a carcass from Belarus. I was shocked at what kind of production it was! There are no words Molotsy!
    1. -3
      17 June 2016 09: 27
      Quote: Siberia 9444
      they brought me a carcass from Belarus

      Definitely not Chinese, resold by Belarus? Or Chinese meat, definitely.
      1. 0
        17 June 2016 18: 38
        Cons from suppliers of Chinese stew in Belarus.
        You see, lovers of "Belarusian" stew? Eshte is better than Polish .. oh! I'm sorry - Belarusian apples, of course, are so green ...
  21. -1
    17 June 2016 08: 11
    It’s bad for us that we won’t deliver our MLRSs to Belarus, and the Chinas got a lead for the Belarusian military-industrial complex! Otherwise, everything is fine!
    1. +2
      17 June 2016 09: 30
      In this you are right, because what the kittens come up with tomorrow, what comes to their mind? Missiles must be universal in caliber and their own.
    2. 0
      17 June 2016 18: 33
      Quote: AKsvlad047
      Otherwise, everything is fine!

      Yes, everything is fine, beautiful marquise, everything is fine, everything is tight !!!
  22. +2
    17 June 2016 09: 29
    Dance Europa! Under the Polonaise :)
    1. +2
      17 June 2016 11: 05
      Eurapecians minus? So right, sausages them from the partisans, no one will leave. Even if they do not think to meddle in the borders of Belarus.
  23. 0
    17 June 2016 13: 49
    Well, a good thing, and most importantly a gorgeous name with a subtle sense of humor and a hint for nearby okhlamonov. fellow