MIC: armored vehicles "Tiger" will be upgraded

In the near future, “Military Industrial Company” will sign an agreement with the Ministry of Defense on the modernization of Tiger’s armored cars, as a result of which they will become machines of a new generation, reports RIA News A message from the general director of the enterprise, Alexander Krasovitsky.

“Our company MIC in July will be ten years. This is not so much, but not a little - these are ten years of active work, ten years for Tiger. Of course, we understand that we have to improve it, and we practically have already received an order from the Ministry of Defense for the modernization of our "Tiger". We hope to sign a contract in the near future "

said the CEO at Eurosatory-2016.

According to him, “after modernization, the Tigr will become the machine of the new generation, its running gear will be significantly improved, as well as bullet resistance, mine resistance and other characteristics of the car.”

The exhibition of ground forces Eurosatory-2016 opened in France on June 13. Tomorrow, June 17, it will complete its work. Russia is represented at the 11 exhibition by companies, 7 of which are manufacturers of military equipment.

Comments

[Koresh]

The machine is good, it can be equipped with new modules or will improve mine protection but the niche that it occupies is ambiguous. It’s good for scouts, but not needed for line parts, for corps it is still possible with a cornet module.

[poquello]

Quote: Koresh

The machine is good, it can be equipped with new modules or will improve mine protection but the niche that it occupies is ambiguous. Good for scouts for linear parts not needed, for the Airborne is still possible with the Cornet module.

let me wonder where such categoricalness comes from?

[Koresh]

This is not so much categorical, but how much understanding that the linear (motorized rifle) units for supporting and transporting personnel have armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles that are superior to the TIGER in armament and armor. For scouts and parts of the SBR, this will be the most, especially if they put in a good managed module.

[33 Watcher]

And how many "Willis", "Kozliks", "UAZs" do the army need in all sorts of ways, in different years? There the reservation is generally 0. However, the cars were always needed.

[Koresh]

Yes, they were needed, but for the transportation of l / s across territories where there was no contact with the enemy. Any DRG destroyed Willis, Kozliks, UAZs in a matter of seconds. Now Typhoons of different modifications and the same tiger are being adapted for these tasks, but it has a weak anti-mine, for this a machine of the MRAP type is more suitable.

[ARES623]

Quote: Koresh

Now Typhoons of different modifications are adapting for these tasks the same tiger, but it has a weak mine, it is more suitable for this machine type MRAP.

You have an idea of ​​army life, probably only from TV. Incidentally, the German infantry company commander had a company car. In our MRS and SMEs, it would be quite useful for the organization of staff and economic activities to have something easier than an infantry fighting vehicle or an armored personnel carrier. A tiger would be quite appropriate. If Vatutin had an armored car, maybe he would have taken Berlin ...

[Altona]

Quote: ARES623

Incidentally, the German infantry company commander had a company car.

-------------------------
You are right, and "Horch" and "Kuebelvagen" are equally defenseless cans, just different levels of luxury.

[ARES623]

Quote: Altona

"Horch" and "Kuebelvagen" are equally defenseless cans, just different levels of luxury.

The issue is not the level of luxury, but the fact that running a company requires some transport services, including communications, delivery of small goods, and simply deliver the body to a meeting or reconnaissance. Today, standard military equipment is used as a taxi, which in itself is very expensive and not practical from a combat point of view, because the combat vehicle is used for rear needs. And for this we need machines that are lighter and cheaper, but somewhat protected from small arms.

[Altona]

Quote: Koresh

Yes, they were needed, but for the transportation of l / s through territories where there was no contact with the enemy. Any DRG destroyed Willis, Kozliks, UAZs in a matter of seconds.

-------------------------
The DRG and the tank will be destroyed in a matter of seconds, it is not in vain that she is ambushed, and the helicopter is too tough for her in the presence of MANPADS or a long-range grenade launcher.

[poquello]

Quote: Koresh

Armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles which surpass the TIGER in armament and reservation

and the spirits in Syria do not know that only armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, everything is on carts, why?

[Alexey RA]

Quote: poquello

and the spirits in Syria do not know that only armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, everything is on carts, why?

Probably because they do not have armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles "in marketable quantities."

Toyota can be removed anywhere and upgraded / repaired in any workshop (in the garage "near Ashot" ). And specialized armor can be squeezed out only from government formations (and not the fact that it is whole), and for a high-quality repair of the "armor" you need normal rear areas (with an evacuation, repair and supply service) and, preferably, an armored personnel carrier. If the regulars with their rear areas cannot cope with the repairs and plug the holes with all kinds of ancient rubbish and ersatz, then with the bearded, this is much worse.

[poquello]

Quote: Alexey RA

Quote: poquello

and the spirits in Syria do not know that only armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, everything is on carts, why?

Probably because they do not have armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles "in marketable quantities."
...

yes, the obvious answer, but not so long ago they still had money to eat, the second obvious one is the image of simple folk fighters, but the Suvorov-Napoleon principle "Quickness, onslaught" was implemented very well by them in the PM using carts

Quote: Alexey RA

And specialized armor can be squeezed out only from government units (

would be "captured" from fighters against ISIS fighters

[Alexey RA]

Quote: poquello

yes, the obvious answer, but not so long ago they still had money to eat

And how to repair, say, a failed tower drive with just money? Paste it with bills?
Money decides everything only in the mriy of liberal economists. In fact, we need equipment, space and trained personnel. With all this, the bearded man is tense.

Quote: poquello

would be "captured" from fighters against ISIS fighters

In those parts of the BTT sources there are only two: the government army of Syria and the government army of Iraq. Apparently, the Iraqis had already passed the period of mass surrender of BTTs - their bearded men had already squeezed out everything that was bad.

[poquello]

Quote: Alexey RA

In fact, we need equipment, space and trained personnel. With all this, the bearded man is tense.

now they have a lot of stress, and there was a moment they almost looked for pilots

Quote: Alexey RA

In those parts of the BTT sources there are only two: the government army of Syria and the government army of Iraq.

"not terrorists" yet, from whom they "capture" TOV, and I personally think that it was not bad, but bad

[Forest]

Such BAs are cheap to operate, and in peacetime it is suitable to carry both people and goods. In the military - they are also protected, unlike army UAZs, which as soon as they weren’t strengthened by their own forces — they hung the armor plates on the doors and hung sheets of iron. For an APC, escort is required when driving around the city, here it is not.

[Maxom75]

Why were improvements needed? This is the result of practical application in Syria. Another plus from the military operation carried out by ours in Syria.

[poquello]

Quote: Maxom75

Why were improvements needed? This is the result of practical application in Syria. Another plus from the military operation carried out by ours in Syria.

The series went and there was money for fine-tuning and experience gained.

[dchegrinec]

Syria showed ..

[Gray brother]

Quote: dchegrinec

Syria showed ..

They are used there as a transport and in no other way, it was hardly possible to show anything there.

[Izotovp]

That would be on its base MLRS type Solntsepeka !! Some kind of light model. With a vertical PU in the rear and a kilometer range in 3 at least!

[Berkut24]

... and with a thermonuclear engine ... you sometimes turn on your head!

[vic58]

Yeah! Simple Siberian felt boots with automated control and vertical take-off !!!!
And the stewardess on board!

[Aleksandr12]

As far as I understand, the Wolf armored car will not be accepted into service.

[avg-mgn]

Quote: Izotovp

That would be on its base MLRS type Solntsepeka !! Some kind of light model. With a vertical PU in the rear and a kilometer range in 3 at least!

The Tiger is primarily a secure vehicle, not a fire support vehicle.

[Izotovp]

Dear opponents, I’m turning on your head: I started digging on this topic and it turned out that I’m not the only one so smart (I won’t praise myself ...). http://topwar.ru/34344-reaktivnaya-sistema-zalpovogo-ognya-mini-grad.html
Please read and continue do not rush to throw chairs.

[poquello]

Quote: avg-mgn

The Tiger is primarily a secure vehicle, not a fire support vehicle.

there are several qualities evaluate the effectiveness of the vehicle
delivery system, defense support, offensive support and how the company will be completed probably depends on the company’s tasks, but of course the MLRS

With vertical PU in the back

It is something ))))

[Izotovp]

Dear experts, less inertia, please! If different types of mujahideen had listened to you at one time, they would never have been able to shoot from civilian pickups from zushki and nursa from the sides of simple, non-reinforced suspension.

[Izotovp]

http://topwar.ru/13888-nlos-ls-raketa-v-konteynere.html

[poquello]

Quote: Izotovp

//topwar.ru/13888-nlos-ls-raketa-v-konteynere.html

if you come across an article about Katyusha, read it, well, but vertical-launch missiles, respectively, managed things are expensive, their use should be cost-effective, maybe when small-sized missiles of this type become commonplace, but for now, choosing a direction with guides is cheaper

[Izotovp]

I agree that they are still much more expensive. But, firstly, progress does not stand still, and secondly, the conveyor greatly knocks down the price. Especially if this node will be unified with a similar node of another complex.

[bad]

kind of brutal .. it would be good for him and the corresponding weapons and increase security ..

[Alexander War]

Yes, I agree

[Alexander War]

Raise a little Tiger armor protection, by the way those Tigers in Syria protection class according to the old 5 plus loopholes in the windows, is on the roof or a machine gun or ags

[Alexander War]

In addition to the Tigers, we also have such UAZ Patriots

[Alexander War]

Rostvertol. Production of helicopters of the Mi-26T, Mi-28N and Mi-35M family http://gelio.livejournal.com/216241.html

[Alexander War]

Google tax http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2799840.html

[Alexander War]

An interesting article by Kassad Poltoranin on June 12 http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2794309.html

[Alexander War]

More about the plane, the same Malaysian interesting article by Kassad http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2794174.html

[Lester7777]

Any armored shed is better than a UAZ with armored doors, and a Tiger is not a bad car. Improve the protection of the shooter on the roof. And "Cornet", I would say, would not hurt a machine gun, because in which case, only show the figs in the window.

[Alexander War]

You want a transformer)) Tiger with Cornets for Tanks and BMP A Tiger with a machine gun mount "Crossbow-DM" for infantry, I would add an automatic grenade launcher to it

[Lester7777]

This is already two "Tigers", where one is enough, capable of effectively hitting armored targets, and, if necessary, greatly upset the enemy infantry. Yes, and on handicraft non-armored vehicles, which are very common in modern conflicts, every time you spend a missile - you will not be enough missiles.

[Alexander War]

http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2786297.html Интересная статья у Кассада плюс дополнение про вертолеты со статей у Дениса Мокрушина плюс дополню у АК-12 про защиту десанта в вертолетах http://ak-12.livejournal.com/52552.html для Ми-35 и Ми 26Т2 особенно для летчиков броня нужна

[Alexander War]

minus one

[Bayonet]

Quote: Alexander War

minus one

I don’t understand, what does “Rostvertol” have to do with taxes on Google, Poltoranin and Malaysian Boeing ??? What do they have to do with the modernization of the Tiger ???

[Alexander War]

They don’t have a tiger. For horizons