Military Review

MIC: armored vehicles "Tiger" will be upgraded

45
In the near future, “Military Industrial Company” will sign an agreement with the Ministry of Defense on the modernization of Tiger’s armored cars, as a result of which they will become machines of a new generation, reports RIA News A message from the general director of the enterprise, Alexander Krasovitsky.



“Our company MIC in July will be ten years. This is not so much, but not a little - these are ten years of active work, ten years for Tiger. Of course, we understand that we have to improve it, and we practically have already received an order from the Ministry of Defense for the modernization of our "Tiger". We hope to sign a contract in the near future "
said the CEO at Eurosatory-2016.

According to him, “after modernization, the Tigr will become the machine of the new generation, its running gear will be significantly improved, as well as bullet resistance, mine resistance and other characteristics of the car.”

The exhibition of ground forces Eurosatory-2016 opened in France on June 13. Tomorrow, June 17, it will complete its work. Russia is represented at the 11 exhibition by companies, 7 of which are manufacturers of military equipment.
Photos used:
LLC "MIC"
45 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Koresh
    Koresh 16 June 2016 10: 45
    +2
    The machine is good, it can be equipped with new modules or will improve mine protection but the niche that it occupies is ambiguous. It’s good for scouts, but not needed for line parts, for corps it is still possible with a cornet module.
    1. poquello
      poquello 16 June 2016 10: 50
      +10
      Quote: Koresh
      The machine is good, it can be equipped with new modules or will improve mine protection but the niche that it occupies is ambiguous. Good for scouts for linear parts not needed, for the Airborne is still possible with the Cornet module.

      let me wonder where such categoricalness comes from?
      1. Koresh
        Koresh 16 June 2016 10: 56
        +3
        This is not so much categorical, but how much understanding that the linear (motorized rifle) units for supporting and transporting personnel have armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles that are superior to the TIGER in armament and armor. For scouts and parts of the SBR, this will be the most, especially if they put in a good managed module.
        1. 33 Watcher
          33 Watcher 16 June 2016 11: 02
          +13
          And how many "Willis", "Kozliks", "UAZs" do the army need in all sorts of ways, in different years? There the reservation is generally 0. However, the cars were always needed.
          1. Koresh
            Koresh 16 June 2016 11: 07
            +3
            Yes, they were needed, but for the transportation of l / s across territories where there was no contact with the enemy. Any DRG destroyed Willis, Kozliks, UAZs in a matter of seconds. Now Typhoons of different modifications and the same tiger are being adapted for these tasks, but it has a weak anti-mine, for this a machine of the MRAP type is more suitable.
            1. ARES623
              ARES623 16 June 2016 11: 25
              +9
              Quote: Koresh
              Now Typhoons of different modifications are adapting for these tasks the same tiger, but it has a weak mine, it is more suitable for this machine type MRAP.

              You have an idea of ​​army life, probably only from TV. Incidentally, the German infantry company commander had a company car. In our MRS and SMEs, it would be quite useful for the organization of staff and economic activities to have something easier than an infantry fighting vehicle or an armored personnel carrier. A tiger would be quite appropriate. If Vatutin had an armored car, maybe he would have taken Berlin ...
              1. Altona
                Altona 16 June 2016 12: 19
                +1
                Quote: ARES623
                Incidentally, the German infantry company commander had a company car.

                -------------------------
                You are right, and "Horch" and "Kuebelvagen" are equally defenseless cans, just different levels of luxury.
                1. ARES623
                  ARES623 16 June 2016 21: 38
                  +1
                  Quote: Altona
                  "Horch" and "Kuebelvagen" are equally defenseless cans, just different levels of luxury.

                  The issue is not the level of luxury, but the fact that running a company requires some transport services, including communications, delivery of small goods, and simply deliver the body to a meeting or reconnaissance. Today, standard military equipment is used as a taxi, which in itself is very expensive and not practical from a combat point of view, because the combat vehicle is used for rear needs. And for this we need machines that are lighter and cheaper, but somewhat protected from small arms.
            2. Altona
              Altona 16 June 2016 12: 17
              +4
              Quote: Koresh
              Yes, they were needed, but for the transportation of l / s through territories where there was no contact with the enemy. Any DRG destroyed Willis, Kozliks, UAZs in a matter of seconds.

              -------------------------
              The DRG and the tank will be destroyed in a matter of seconds, it is not in vain that she is ambushed, and the helicopter is too tough for her in the presence of MANPADS or a long-range grenade launcher.
        2. poquello
          poquello 16 June 2016 11: 16
          +1
          Quote: Koresh
          Armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles which surpass the TIGER in armament and reservation

          and the spirits in Syria do not know that only armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, everything is on carts, why?
          1. Alexey RA
            Alexey RA 16 June 2016 11: 31
            +3
            Quote: poquello
            and the spirits in Syria do not know that only armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, everything is on carts, why?

            Probably because they do not have armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles "in marketable quantities." smile

            Toyota can be removed anywhere and upgraded / repaired in any workshop (in the garage "near Ashot" smile ). And specialized armor can be squeezed out only from government formations (and not the fact that it is whole), and for a high-quality repair of the "armor" you need normal rear areas (with an evacuation, repair and supply service) and, preferably, an armored personnel carrier. If the regulars with their rear areas cannot cope with the repairs and plug the holes with all kinds of ancient rubbish and ersatz, then with the bearded, this is much worse.
            1. poquello
              poquello 16 June 2016 15: 14
              0
              Quote: Alexey RA
              Quote: poquello
              and the spirits in Syria do not know that only armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, everything is on carts, why?

              Probably because they do not have armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles "in marketable quantities." smile
              ...

              yes, the obvious answer, but not so long ago they still had money to eat, the second obvious one is the image of simple folk fighters, but the Suvorov-Napoleon principle "Quickness, onslaught" was implemented very well by them in the PM using carts
              Quote: Alexey RA
              And specialized armor can be squeezed out only from government units (

              would be "captured" from fighters against ISIS fighters
              1. Alexey RA
                Alexey RA 16 June 2016 15: 33
                0
                Quote: poquello
                yes, the obvious answer, but not so long ago they still had money to eat

                And how to repair, say, a failed tower drive with just money? Paste it with bills? wink
                Money decides everything only in the mriy of liberal economists. In fact, we need equipment, space and trained personnel. With all this, the bearded man is tense.
                Quote: poquello
                would be "captured" from fighters against ISIS fighters

                In those parts of the BTT sources there are only two: the government army of Syria and the government army of Iraq. Apparently, the Iraqis had already passed the period of mass surrender of BTTs - their bearded men had already squeezed out everything that was bad. smile
                1. poquello
                  poquello 16 June 2016 19: 00
                  0
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  In fact, we need equipment, space and trained personnel. With all this, the bearded man is tense.

                  now they have a lot of stress, and there was a moment they almost looked for pilots
                  Quote: Alexey RA
                  In those parts of the BTT sources there are only two: the government army of Syria and the government army of Iraq.

                  "not terrorists" yet, from whom they "capture" TOV, and I personally think that it was not bad, but bad
        3. Forest
          Forest 16 June 2016 11: 56
          +1
          Such BAs are cheap to operate, and in peacetime it is suitable to carry both people and goods. In the military - they are also protected, unlike army UAZs, which as soon as they weren’t strengthened by their own forces — they hung the armor plates on the doors and hung sheets of iron. For an APC, escort is required when driving around the city, here it is not.
    2. Maxom75
      Maxom75 16 June 2016 12: 21
      +1
      Why were improvements needed? This is the result of practical application in Syria. Another plus from the military operation carried out by ours in Syria.
      1. poquello
        poquello 16 June 2016 15: 18
        0
        Quote: Maxom75
        Why were improvements needed? This is the result of practical application in Syria. Another plus from the military operation carried out by ours in Syria.

        The series went and there was money for fine-tuning and experience gained.
  2. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 16 June 2016 10: 47
    0
    Syria showed ..
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 16 June 2016 10: 58
      +2
      Quote: dchegrinec
      Syria showed ..

      They are used there as a transport and in no other way, it was hardly possible to show anything there.
  3. Izotovp
    Izotovp 16 June 2016 10: 48
    +1
    That would be on its base MLRS type Solntsepeka !! Some kind of light model. With a vertical PU in the rear and a kilometer range in 3 at least!
    1. Berkut24
      Berkut24 16 June 2016 11: 00
      +5
      ... and with a thermonuclear engine ... you sometimes turn on your head!
    2. vic58
      vic58 16 June 2016 11: 09
      0
      Yeah! Simple Siberian felt boots with automated control and vertical take-off !!!!
      And the stewardess on board!
  4. Aleksandr12
    Aleksandr12 16 June 2016 10: 56
    0
    As far as I understand, the Wolf armored car will not be accepted into service.
  5. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 16 June 2016 11: 01
    +3
    Quote: Izotovp
    That would be on its base MLRS type Solntsepeka !! Some kind of light model. With a vertical PU in the rear and a kilometer range in 3 at least!

    The Tiger is primarily a secure vehicle, not a fire support vehicle.
    1. Izotovp
      Izotovp 16 June 2016 14: 51
      0
      Dear opponents, I’m turning on your head: I started digging on this topic and it turned out that I’m not the only one so smart (I won’t praise myself ...). http://topwar.ru/34344-reaktivnaya-sistema-zalpovogo-ognya-mini-grad.html
      Please read and continue do not rush to throw chairs.
    2. poquello
      poquello 16 June 2016 15: 34
      +1
      Quote: avg-mgn
      The Tiger is primarily a secure vehicle, not a fire support vehicle.

      there are several qualities evaluate the effectiveness of the vehicle
      delivery system, defense support, offensive support and how the company will be completed probably depends on the company’s tasks, but of course the MLRS
      With vertical PU in the back
      It is something ))))
      1. Izotovp
        Izotovp 16 June 2016 16: 45
        +1
        Dear experts, less inertia, please! If different types of mujahideen had listened to you at one time, they would never have been able to shoot from civilian pickups from zushki and nursa from the sides of simple, non-reinforced suspension.
        1. Izotovp
          Izotovp 16 June 2016 16: 46
          +1
          http://topwar.ru/13888-nlos-ls-raketa-v-konteynere.html
          1. poquello
            poquello 16 June 2016 18: 49
            +1
            Quote: Izotovp
            //topwar.ru/13888-nlos-ls-raketa-v-konteynere.html

            if you come across an article about Katyusha, read it, well, but vertical-launch missiles, respectively, managed things are expensive, their use should be cost-effective, maybe when small-sized missiles of this type become commonplace, but for now, choosing a direction with guides is cheaper
            1. Izotovp
              Izotovp 16 June 2016 19: 19
              +1
              I agree that they are still much more expensive. But, firstly, progress does not stand still, and secondly, the conveyor greatly knocks down the price. Especially if this node will be unified with a similar node of another complex.
  6. bad
    bad 16 June 2016 11: 03
    +4
    kind of brutal .. it would be good for him and the corresponding weapons and increase security ..
    1. Alexander War
      Alexander War 16 June 2016 12: 15
      +2
      Yes, I agree
  7. Alexander War
    Alexander War 16 June 2016 11: 10
    +1
    Raise a little Tiger armor protection, by the way those Tigers in Syria protection class according to the old 5 plus loopholes in the windows, is on the roof or a machine gun or ags
  8. Alexander War
    Alexander War 16 June 2016 11: 14
    +2
    In addition to the Tigers, we also have such UAZ Patriots
  9. Alexander War
    Alexander War 16 June 2016 11: 48
    +1
    Rostvertol. Production of helicopters of the Mi-26T, Mi-28N and Mi-35M family http://gelio.livejournal.com/216241.html
  10. Alexander War
    Alexander War 16 June 2016 11: 49
    +1
    Google tax http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2799840.html
  11. Alexander War
    Alexander War 16 June 2016 11: 51
    +1
    An interesting article by Kassad Poltoranin on June 12 http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2794309.html
  12. Alexander War
    Alexander War 16 June 2016 11: 54
    +1
    More about the plane, the same Malaysian interesting article by Kassad http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2794174.html
  13. Lester7777
    Lester7777 16 June 2016 11: 54
    +3
    Any armored shed is better than a UAZ with armored doors, and a Tiger is not a bad car. Improve the protection of the shooter on the roof. And "Cornet", I would say, would not hurt a machine gun, because in which case, only show the figs in the window.
    1. Alexander War
      Alexander War 16 June 2016 12: 09
      +1
      You want a transformer)) Tiger with Cornets for Tanks and BMP A Tiger with a machine gun mount "Crossbow-DM" for infantry, I would add an automatic grenade launcher to it
      1. Lester7777
        Lester7777 16 June 2016 13: 00
        +1
        This is already two "Tigers", where one is enough, capable of effectively hitting armored targets, and, if necessary, greatly upset the enemy infantry. Yes, and on handicraft non-armored vehicles, which are very common in modern conflicts, every time you spend a missile - you will not be enough missiles.
  14. Alexander War
    Alexander War 16 June 2016 12: 02
    +1
    http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2786297.html Интересная статья у Кассада плюс дополнение про вертолеты со статей у Дениса Мокрушина плюс дополню у АК-12 про защиту десанта в вертолетах http://ak-12.livejournal.com/52552.html для Ми-35 и Ми 26Т2 особенно для летчиков броня нужна
  15. Alexander War
    Alexander War 16 June 2016 12: 11
    +1
    laughing minus one
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 16 June 2016 15: 55
      +3
      Quote: Alexander War
      minus one

      I don’t understand, what does “Rostvertol” have to do with taxes on Google, Poltoranin and Malaysian Boeing ??? What do they have to do with the modernization of the Tiger ???
      1. Alexander War
        Alexander War 16 June 2016 16: 03
        +1
        They don’t have a tiger. For horizons