Military Review

Group "Ahrar al-Sham" announced the destruction of the T-90 near Aleppo (video)

83
A video appeared on the Internet published by the Ahrar al-Sham group, which allegedly captures the moment of destruction tank T-90 Syrian Army Transmits Lenta.ru report.




According to the militants, the video was made to the south of the city of Aleppo.

The record shows how a rocket fired from an anti-tank complex gets into the side of a moving machine, after which an explosion occurs.



“There are no consequences of the rocket hitting the video, and the quality of the recording does not allow to identify the type of tank with accuracy, although it does allow to state that it belongs to the T-72 / T-90 family,” comments the video.

For the first time T-90 tanks were recorded in the Aleppo area in November 2015.
Photos used:
https://www.youtube.com
83 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 13 warrior
    13 warrior 15 June 2016 12: 19
    +51
    I don’t understand what they want to prove by the fact of the destruction of the T-90? What is no invulnerable armored vehicles? So it is already known.
    Amuse your hsv if only.)) Silly.
    1. shooter18
      shooter18 15 June 2016 12: 20
      +10
      Grandmas work out
      1. Byshido_dis
        Byshido_dis 15 June 2016 13: 06
        +13
        They are like children rejoicing that at least they have finally destroyed something !! Although not a fact, the tank drove out of the building, it was possible that the passivation and pieces of casing worked, so the remains of the canopy from the tank. And the crew escaped with a slight startle.
        1. _Vladislav_
          _Vladislav_ 15 June 2016 14: 06
          +28
          One tank per week. If this is all, then you better smoke aside. You are one of our tanks, we are 20 of yours and another hundred people. One lion will tear ten sheep.
          We, too, can principle every day spread on YouTube as our VKS jackals are leveled.

        2. RDX
          RDX 15 June 2016 17: 51
          +1
          in any case, BC did not detonate
      2. Oleg Lavrov
        Oleg Lavrov 15 June 2016 14: 52
        +11
        The video does not confirm the destruction of the tank! Barmaley rejoice only in a successful hit. There is no ignition that could be seen, the ATGM burns the tank in a matter of seconds, not to mention the ammo detonation. Here, the work of either dynamic protection or "curtains" is just confirmed. Since the crew of the car, could easily get out of the line of fire! Of course, medium severity concussions to the crew are guaranteed, but the fact of leaving speaks of the viability of both the vehicle and the crew!
        1. Sashka
          Sashka 15 June 2016 17: 41
          +3
          Here I am about the same !!! Not the fact that the T-90, and not the fact that they destroyed ...
          Here you can see what was destroyed (not the fact that the T-90):

          Well, I want to say that there is no invulnerable equipment, especially since it is not always correctly used ...
          Good day!
        2. Maxom75
          Maxom75 15 June 2016 17: 57
          0
          I also do not see the fact of destruction. There is a hit, apparently the Arena is again turned off. These Syrians do not study as they should. The hit triggered the dynamic defense and the tank safely left the line of fire, the tank did not lose any mobility and the crew remained alive and capable. so I don’t understand what these chebureks were happy about.
          1. Blackgrifon
            Blackgrifon 15 June 2016 19: 05
            +8
            Quote: Maxom75
            The arena is again turned off.

            1. The arena does NOT stand on any of the serial tanks of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation and is not supplied for export (as a gift).
            2. There is no invulnerable equipment.
            3. The Islamists, like the non-brothers, have neither a tank, nor Armata (at worst T-90).
            1. Maxom75
              Maxom75 15 June 2016 23: 09
              +1
              Sorry, Curtain, right? And the fact that the tank survived and left the line of fire is a documentary fact. The tanks themselves do not leave, so the crew is alive.
    2. CORNET
      CORNET 15 June 2016 12: 20
      +8
      Shaw again ... So what?
      1. Now we are free
        Now we are free 15 June 2016 12: 58
        +55
        Analytics (playful) Internet expert

        1) .Pffff and? .. What so far removed that? Proofs give proofs so it could even be not T-90 and T-72 (BZ) but T-62 with elements of dynamic protection.
        2). Hello cuckoo! Where is the canonically flying up tower? .. Everyone knows that the Soviet-Russian tanks, when they are defeated, fly off the tower (though sarcasm is sad) on the video this is not? No, only flying elements of onboard protection, not only that shyly the video stops ... Maybe so that we don't see the "Destroyed" tank moving on on its own?

        The total that I saw in the short "THIS WASLT90MY SWEAT!" From something they fell into something, an explosion, from something that flies off (as a result of the explosion), that's all for that ... Thanks, but not an offset. wassat
        I'd rather look at Gadya Khavchenko as she sits on barefoot "courts" in the Rada. In this case, I at least know that she is Gadya and sits in the Rada on the "courts" ...
        1. cap
          cap 15 June 2016 13: 15
          +11
          Quote: Now we are free
          In total, what I saw in the short film is "THIS WAS 90 MOM I SWEAR!" From something they hit something, an explosion, from which something flies off (as a result of an explosion) something and that's all ... Thank you, but not a credit


          Offset! I especially liked it- "THIS WAS 90 MOM!" smile
          1. Oleg16661
            Oleg16661 15 June 2016 18: 07
            0
            Quote: cap
            Offset! I especially liked it- "THIS WAS 90 MOM!" smile

            Rather THIS WAS 90ALLAHUAKBAR3000RAZ
            1. bashkir
              bashkir 15 June 2016 21: 02
              +2
              For Muslims, even Russia, such exclamations, in a comic form, are an insult to religious feelings. Feel the COMPETITION THIS IS 90 Great Jesus. I apologize for the comparison, but I need a clear example
              1. sharp-lad
                sharp-lad 15 June 2016 22: 45
                +1
                In principle, there is no difference to me, but I agree with you, you should not hurt the feelings of believers without a huge need. hi
              2. 1rl141
                1rl141 15 June 2016 23: 52
                +6
                Quote: Bashkir
                For Muslims, even Russia, such exclamations, in a comic form, are an insult to religious feelings. Feel the COMPETITION THIS IS 90 Great Jesus. I apologize for the comparison, but I need a clear example


                About Muslims and "I swear by my mother!"
                We had about two hundred fighters in our company. And about 50 of them were Azerbaijanis. The rest - a pair of each creature. All 200 are one call.
                And intelligence reported that the Azerbaijanis, taking advantage of their mass character, took money from those who were weaker and did not have fellow countrymen, after each issue of the money content. The soldier then received 12 rubles. And these warriors of Islam, squeezed on five.
                We find out the name of one "horseman". We call the office and just start talking like a human being. Like, so and so, you, comrade Huseynov, are wrong, bring the money and return it to everyone from whom you took money. It is not good to rob your comrades, the Koran does not allow. Comrade Huseynov clearly does not understand us, just as he does not understand the human attitude towards himself, but only confidently, with his characteristic proud Caucasian temperament, he shouts:
                - I didn’t take the money! MOM I swear I didn’t take it!
                - Well, you think, do not rush, because your term is short!
                - I swear by MOM! DO NOT TAKE!
                Well ... I look, the commander’s patience is over .. He takes out a boxing and training glove from the safe. Well, I think now the commander will draw an article for himself.
                And then I remembered a film about Stirlitz. Where Pastor Schlag was in the cell.
                Wait, I say, Ivanovich, there is a thought. I go up to this mountain eagle, well, spread your arms to the sides, at shoulder level, and raise your right leg higher. And so stay. If you lower your arms or leg, I’ll bastard you, I will rip out my teeth.
                And we sit down with Ivanych for backgammon. This mountain eagle did not stand in this position for long. Three minutes. We did not even manage to finish the game. Kneeling and mooing:
                - He took money, took it. I'll bring it now.
                In general, he handed over all his accomplices with giblets and brought 450 rubles. This is when our salary was a little over 200. Then the deputy politician smiled them before the ranks and handed out the money back.
                These are the religious feelings against the background of "MOMAYKLYANUS". And more than once I was convinced that for them to swear by mom is like 2 fingers on the asphalt.
        2. TsUS-Air Force
          TsUS-Air Force 15 June 2016 20: 45
          0
          finally found ... right among all comments --- where is the flying tower? correctly a couple of sheets of speaker and all
      2. The comment was deleted.
    3. vodolaz
      vodolaz 15 June 2016 12: 30
      +8
      Better to show how the Abrams are set on fire from a heavy machine gun or how they shot at their own.
      PS. Even if this is so, as they claim, then there is no invulnerable technique.
    4. Andrey K
      Andrey K 15 June 2016 12: 33
      +34
      Quote: 13 warrior
      I don’t understand what they want to prove by the fact of the destruction of the T-90? What is no invulnerable armored vehicles? So it is already known.
      Amuse your hsv if only.)) Silly.

      In principle, in the article for this video, doubt has already been voiced about the effectiveness of the shooting of the barmalei.
      I note again:
      1. In the video it is impossible to consider the type of tank, barmaley can wishful thinking. And in silhouette, from afar, the T-72 is quite similar to the T-90.
      2. A hit is recorded that is - that is. And then it is clearly visible that the tank continued to move to the left, beyond the wall of the building. The fact of the destruction of the tank is in question.
      3. The explosion following the hit may be an explosion of ATGMs, fragments of dynamic protection - but not the detonation of a tank’s tank.
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 15 June 2016 12: 40
        +13
        Quote: Andrey K
        And then it can be clearly seen that the tank continued to move left behind the wall of the building. The fact of the destruction of the tank is in question.



        in this case, after the explosion, the smoke dissipates and the cloud decreases ... in repetitions, this moment is already cut out ..
      2. Alexey-74
        Alexey-74 15 June 2016 12: 44
        +9
        quite right, the ATGM hit is visible, but the movement of the tank continues, there is no explosion of the BC, the crew may have survived
        1. Pushkar77
          Pushkar77 15 June 2016 12: 57
          +5
          All this once again confirms that the T-90 is a good and tenacious tank, once a similar video is thrown on the Internet. For them, getting on the T-90 is already a holiday. In general, the number of videos about the destruction of Syrian armored vehicles (I mean, the one that came to the Syrians, on the eve, or during the operation of our airborne forces) has decreased significantly compared to the recent past. After all, dozens of videos posted on the Internet.
          1. Professor
            Professor 15 June 2016 13: 05
            -11%
            Quote: Pushkar77
            In general, the number of videos about the destruction of Syrian armored vehicles (I mean, the one that came to the Syrians, on the eve, or during the operation of our airborne forces) has decreased significantly compared to the recent past.

            What exactly allowed you to draw such a conclusion? Have you subscribed to the channel of the militias or are they sending you videos in a personal video? request

            Well, hit the tank, destroyed the tank? So what? What is the article about?
            1. Pushkar77
              Pushkar77 15 June 2016 13: 32
              +10
              Yes, at first I followed this topic of the conflict, suffice it to say that at the end of 2013, the Syrian army lost more than a thousand armored vehicles, this was a statement by the Syrian authorities. It was lost for the most part in urban battles, it was mainly fired upon by RPG-7. Now, mainly both of them work with ATGMs, and for the most part from long distances, and this also affects the number of knocked out armored vehicles. And the equipment that is now delivered there by Voentorg is much better protected, the same 72s. That's kind of from there.
            2. PN
              PN 15 June 2016 13: 49
              +2
              Hit then hit. Have you destroyed it?
            3. Vladimirets
              Vladimirets 15 June 2016 14: 13
              +4
              Quote: Professor
              What is the article about?

              Well, as it were, this is a military review. request
              1. Professor
                Professor 15 June 2016 14: 37
                +15
                Quote: Vladimirets
                Well, as it were, this is a military review.

                Exactly, otherwise I got the impression that this article is more suitable for the site of the "Ahrar al-Sham" group where they boast of their victories. In fact: we are seeing a tank allegedly T-90, which was knocked out and allegedly struck by the "glorious warriors" by the "Ahrar al-Sham" group. There are no facts, no material evidence, nothing at all. The only thing that can be discussed is the comments of the readers themselves, which have nothing to do with the episode.
            4. 52
              52 15 June 2016 18: 31
              0
              That the ATGM even an Arab star can still get into the tank!
            5. The comment was deleted.
        2. hrapon
          hrapon 15 June 2016 13: 33
          +2
          Quote: Alexey-74
          quite right, the ATGM hit is visible, but the movement of the tank continues, there is no explosion of the BC, the crew may have survived


          Detotation was not on frames for sure.
        3. 341712
          341712 15 June 2016 22: 24
          0
          Quote: Alexey-74
          Alexey-74 (3) Today, 12: 44 ↑
          quite right, the ATGM hit is visible, but the movement of the tank continues, there is no explosion of the BC, the crew may have survived


          Know home, wait for repairs soon ..)))) Well barmalei, well yap ... pah ... not even interesting ...
      3. cap
        cap 15 June 2016 13: 20
        +1
        Quote: Andrey K
        3. The explosion following the hit may be an explosion of ATGMs, fragments of dynamic protection - but not the detonation of a tank’s tank.


        Here I am in agreement with you! It’s not clear whether it’s killed or not hi
    5. tilovaykrisa
      tilovaykrisa 15 June 2016 13: 14
      +2
      there you can’t see what kind of tank it is and it’s not clear whether the car was destroyed or simply damaged;
    6. jaguar
      jaguar 15 June 2016 14: 39
      +1
      True quality has seen such that do not understand what is common in the tank. With the same success, it could be the old t-72 ... and the video somehow breaks off at the wrong time .... it can be seen that the tank is leaving under its own power .........
  2. poquello
    poquello 15 June 2016 12: 20
    +11
    further rides, then the end of the movie
    1. CORNET
      CORNET 15 June 2016 12: 24
      +12
      Quote: poquello
      further rides, then the end of the movie

      We usually specifically urinate! hi
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Alex_Tug
        Alex_Tug 16 June 2016 05: 11
        0
        where are the subtitles? What is the conversation on the radio about? what is soaked? I see the smoke, the motorcycle drove, the rumble of an airplane engine and that’s it. you can write anything by comment ... acoustics experts can probably determine what kind of aircraft was on a drone and say whose. Someone suggested such a grant - to determine what flew by the acoustic track, but I don’t know, someone undertook to do it or not. a lot of hemorrhage ... collect noise for identification for the base.
  3. Koresh
    Koresh 15 June 2016 12: 20
    +3
    One thing can be said: it’s not clear exactly what it is the T-90, possibly 72-yka. But here it is necessary for the Syrians to slam the cuffs for such a use of the tank, and to enter an open position.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 15 June 2016 12: 30
      +5
      The tank did relatively correctly, according to topographic location, he shot through the crossing through which the attack was going on at that time.

      Useless to hide, even if they blow him up, his task was to hit the advancing broads. If they had been knocked out of Halasa yesterday, the tank would still have to be abandoned or destroyed.
  4. neri73-r
    neri73-r 15 June 2016 12: 22
    +5
    Yah!! This is not the T-90, this is Armata, which is so trifling! laughing
    1. 0255
      0255 15 June 2016 16: 12
      +4
      No, only Armed Forces laughing
      1. primers
        primers 15 June 2016 17: 47
        0
        this is a joke! Pleased!
        It seems to me all the news from the Donbass on the globe of Ukraine is
  5. donavi49
    donavi49 15 June 2016 12: 22
    +5
    This is in the area of ​​the most fierce battles for Halasa and Zentan.

    Yesterday was a powerful offensive by the JaF Babahs, virtually live. Again the raid in the 3X4 BMP + Tank groups. Clinging to the night for Zeitan and Halasa. But by the morning we moved to the starting ones. Now they climbed again.




    They are covered by the Central Division of the SSA with the TOU:


  6. Petr1
    Petr1 15 June 2016 12: 22
    +3
    It’s not visible that the tank blew up the rocket hit yes
    1. Castor oil
      Castor oil 15 June 2016 14: 00
      0
      Quote: Petr1
      It’s not visible that the tank blew up the rocket hit yes

      Well, yes, the floodlights and speaker boxes flew off, and that ... and the tank left the visibility zone on its own (damn it, by inertia, it will roll off up the hill). It is noteworthy that this video was cut off, I suppose the "disheveled" T went to "heal" on its own winked but raghead show it is not comme il faut wink
  7. Human Factor
    Human Factor 15 June 2016 12: 23
    +8
    FUNNY GUYING.

    Maybe T-90, maybe not. Maybe destroyed, maybe not.
  8. Altona
    Altona 15 June 2016 12: 24
    +5
    It looks like an explosion of active armor and the destruction of a rocket; there, too, such a fiery sheaf is created. The movie is too short and fuzzy, in 3gp format.
  9. Slon1978
    Slon1978 15 June 2016 12: 24
    +4
    It does not look like the tank is destroyed. It moves forward, flies aboard to the area of ​​the fighting compartment, the tank continues to move after the explosion. The caterpillar equipment has practically no inertia, and certainly not at such speed and ground, that is, the tank has not lost speed. If a side screen hung with a DZ, then there could have been no penetration of the armor. The hit is also a little diagonal, maybe one of the rinks also took a godfather. a stream.
    1. Professor
      Professor 15 June 2016 13: 10
      +1
      Quote: Slon1978
      The caterpillar equipment has practically no inertia, and certainly not at such speed and ground, that is, the tank has not lost speed.

      Yah? Four dozen tons on dry, hard ground ... By the way, now hamsin.
  10. NEXUS
    NEXUS 15 June 2016 12: 24
    +7
    Something tells me that this is not the 90th, but the 72nd. However, it is not yet known whether the crew remained alive. There was no detonation of ammunition. Yes, and the tank continued to move, although this is not an indication that the crew remained alive. It looks like the activation of active defense ...
  11. Prisoner
    Prisoner 15 June 2016 12: 25
    +3
    They are trying to cover the breadwinners from those events where everything was in the frame. winked Wimps! Hollywood must be connected. They will give you and the landing of ISIS on Mars for inexpensive.
    1. Altona
      Altona 15 June 2016 12: 40
      0
      Quote: Captive
      Wimps! Hollywood must be connected.

      ----------------------
      And on the screen saver Hollywood is connected. The screensaver was apparently made on Al-Jazeera, a beautiful cartoon at the beginning and at the end, and advertising links on the blasphemous Twitter, Skype, Google and the Internet.
    2. Corsair
      Corsair 15 June 2016 13: 33
      0
      Quote: Captive
      Hollywood must be connected. They will give you and the landing of ISIS on Mars for inexpensive.

      laughing Hollywood and inexpensive are two incompatible things; they ended inexpensively in the 90s.
  12. Wolka
    Wolka 15 June 2016 12: 28
    0
    war however, in war as in war ...
  13. CORNET
    CORNET 15 June 2016 12: 32
    +1
    Let's see how the "merkavas" behave soon ... hi
  14. Engineer
    Engineer 15 June 2016 12: 41
    +1
    They have all these videos. They also need to account for the money spent - the explosion was, was, then destroyed. I recall how in a city battle they recorded a shot at RPG-29 at Merkava. So the Israelis said that they worked KAZ, and the militants said they had knocked out a tank. Only on the video there are no results, only the moment of the explosion and that’s it.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 15 June 2016 13: 54
      -6
      In my opinion, a bad video is better than none.

      For example, Caliber launches. Starts were shown (repeatedly),
      but hits (or at least explosions of rockets on the ground) were not shown.
      But do you believe that the Caliber destroyed some important objects?

      And here is the evidence, albeit of poor quality.
      1. 33 Watcher
        33 Watcher 15 June 2016 14: 26
        +4
        Quote: voyaka uh
        But do you believe that the Caliber destroyed some important objects?


        No, I don’t believe it. They told me in secret that these launches were filmed at Mosfilm in the pavilion.
        We didn’t participate in Syria at all, and all the money was transferred to Putin’s personal offshore tongue
    2. The comment was deleted.
  15. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 15 June 2016 12: 50
    +3
    You can see the hit, undermining ATGM, undermining DZ. I didn’t see the BC undermining (it’s difficult to miss it). As our Air Force weaken pressure from the air, videos with tank defeat immediately increase ...
  16. Retvizan 8
    Retvizan 8 15 June 2016 12: 52
    +3
    Video is not about anything. Rejoice chernozha.pym you can just hit the tank and that's it. The car left. The explosion is clearly from dynamic protection, if this tank pulled then the tower would have flown.
    The absurd attempts to participate in the information war!
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 15 June 2016 12: 56
      +2
      They can rejoice, as the tank left the position and they broke into Halasa.

      By morning, the broads came out.

      Now they are storming again, having pulled up reserves, they have already entered from the south and east.

      If the army loses Halasu, this means a departure from the balcony of Zentan-Bernan, where there is good defense, and the beginning of battles for Hader, with the broads coming to him from the North (highway from Halasa), the West (west of Yeiss / Bernan) and the South (already).
      1. Pushkar77
        Pushkar77 15 June 2016 13: 47
        +1
        The Syrians, now there seems to be a respite there, our VKS and the Syrian Air Force are working, the militants in armored vehicles have large losses, only today in the morning a tank and two infantry fighting vehicles were destroyed. We’ll see what will happen next. But the battles there are very heavy and frenzied. In Halas, volunteers who came to the rescue helped to rectify the situation. At the moment, neither side has a decisive advantage. Helicopters and airplanes work all day in the sky, so the army must take advantage of this (tighten reserves, restore positions, etc.).
  17. dsm100
    dsm100 15 June 2016 12: 54
    +3
    The ammunition did not work. I think that theoretically the crew could survive. Side screens tore off and smashed into chips this at least, then the video ends. I won’t be surprised if tankers left the tank on their own frames.
  18. Disorder
    Disorder 15 June 2016 13: 03
    +4
    Barmaley have limited vocabulary. They go on the attack - "Allah Akbar" shouting, skidding, losing their pants - also "Allah Akbar".
  19. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 15 June 2016 13: 24
    +2
    I do not presume to judge what kind of car in question, but two, even three points, caught my eye.
    1. For some reason, before the explosion, the picture quality dropped sharply
    2. The crew, apparently, noticed the installation, as he hastened to return to the original.
    3. Judging by the fact that the tank left the building, the driver mechanic remained alive and running, as well as the engine worked.
    Only one conclusion can be drawn from this - the tank wasn’t destroyed, at least at the end of the shooting, if it were finished later - there would be another movie with dancing to screaming and shooting against its background.
    That's about something like this.
  20. Arandir
    Arandir 15 June 2016 13: 26
    +1
    Every day, these Babais are multiplied by 50-100 by zero, and they, as children, rejoice that they destroyed one tank. Now, when as many as 10 pieces of t-90 are destroyed, it is possible that nothing will remain of the terrorists. For Russia, 10 tanks to spend for such a noble purpose is like giving alms at the entrance to the Temple.
  21. wanderer_032
    wanderer_032 15 June 2016 13: 30
    +1
    Group "Ahrar al-Sham" announced the destruction of the T-90 near Aleppo (video)

    Based on the presented video, it is impossible to say for sure that the tank was destroyed, but not damaged.

    Because the tank could be damaged by anti-cumulative side screens or external fuel tanks (this is what could burn from the outside).
    The car went under its own power from the affected area, for cover. It is possible that the fire was subsequently extinguished by the crew. And the car remained in service.
  22. 2sila
    2sila 15 June 2016 13: 33
    0
    Storyboard and zoom. A moment before the explosion. The headlight of the missile "highlighted". The missile hits the side projection at an acute angle and the tank by inertia (?!) rushes further up the "mountain" ...
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 15 June 2016 13: 46
      0
      The "turret" is visible. Still, the T-90?
      1. Pushkar77
        Pushkar77 15 June 2016 14: 57
        +2
        Hello warrior. T-90 is in service with "Tigers" and "Desert Falcons", and according to reports they are in battles for these us. items are not included. The IRGC army and volunteers work here, they have T-72s. Of course, they threw cons to you in vain, there is nothing offensive in the comments.
        1. voyaka uh
          voyaka uh 15 June 2016 17: 20
          +3
          Duc ..., I'm honestly trying to distinguish the side of the T-72 from the T-90.
          The front is understandable. Two round "spotlights" Curtains. And on the side?
          Syrians from their T-72 towers have long had heavy machine guns
          removed - they are put on the "carts".
          Therefore, the "turret" is a machine gun turret with a T-90 ammunition box.
          Or a self-made turret on the T-72?

          I do not claim that the tank is knocked out:
          Maybe 1) penetration, and the surviving mechanic removes the tank from under the fire
          2) the DZ worked and the tank was unharmed.
        2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  23. GeorgeSev85
    GeorgeSev85 15 June 2016 13: 44
    0
    Quote: Byshido_dis
    They are like children rejoicing that at least they have finally destroyed something !! Although not a fact, the tank drove out of the building, it was possible that the passivation and pieces of casing worked, so the remains of the canopy from the tank. And the crew escaped with a slight startle.

    If the BC exploded or it burned then the broads would shoot to the end and so ...
    1. 33 Watcher
      33 Watcher 15 June 2016 14: 33
      +5
      If they had really destroyed the T - 90, they would have posted a video of a broken-down tank, galloping over it and yelling "allayavbar". This is already hell knows what the T-90 is, they have ... Or do they also, like dill, have a battery that sits down at the wrong time? laughing
  24. Alekseyklg
    Alekseyklg 15 June 2016 14: 52
    +1
    The video is about nothing! It does not confirm the statements either about the model of the tank, or about the fact of destruction, I did not even see that it was a Syrian tank. And as for the hit of calibers, anything can be questioned, especially the military power of the Americans of their friends and allies in NATO, and even more their good intentions and desire to help people be free. Videoconferencing does not shoot Hollywood as they can, the main thing is that this ignited in one place in the whole West, after which they started talking about reconciliation in Syria, and they want to remove Assad not so loudly. What more confirmation is needed?
    ps In war, as in war, even the best tank is not 100% protected, there is also a human factor!
  25. korvin1976
    korvin1976 15 June 2016 15: 15
    +2
    Such videos need to be tracked first of all by the Russian Ministry of Defense.
    I posted a grouping of the video, got a black mark.
    And then still fik understand who and what is there. They say that the moderate and do not fight, but themselves just around the corner and from the ground in the tank.

    Talk about the video about nothing. I think it's stupid. Video in fact is a docking thing, a docking dock belonging to a given group and those associated with them not to peaceful measles, but to those against whom our aviation is still used.
    I think our MO has the opportunity to track the video and the persons involved in it. The Bundeswehr and look with him, they constantly complain that the Russian special services are hosting their computer networks at home, they are terrorizing, they are not letting us play solitaire and watching porn.
  26. stranik
    stranik 15 June 2016 15: 33
    +3
    here look about the T-90 at 1.23 there is a hit but the tank is not destroyed.
  27. andr327
    andr327 15 June 2016 15: 37
    0
    The letters are beautiful, impressive, and the film itself, so-so
  28. 0255
    0255 15 June 2016 16: 19
    +1
    I hope the whole crew of the tank survived
  29. Maxim73
    Maxim73 15 June 2016 16: 29
    +2
    Hit recorded, destruction of equipment is not recorded.
  30. Skubudu
    Skubudu 15 June 2016 17: 49
    +4
    Another TOW was spent ... no matter how evil-minded people were trying to prove the opposite, face to face, barmalei always remove to the end, savoring the explosion of the ammunition and the torn turret of the tank. Here, the shooting was suddenly interrupted, because the shooting did not give a result. TOW is not effective against the t-90, they will no longer buy it at all.
    T-90 is the only warring tank that has not yet been destroyed by enemy fire.
    I won’t be surprised if the mattresses themselves soon take TOW or Javelin, wrap a rag on the Bosko, take the cameras and go look for the T-90 to shoot at it.
  31. primers
    primers 15 June 2016 17: 55
    +2
    Barmalei can declare anything and get anywhere. The main thing in this is participation in actual combat operations of modern models and an analysis of its application. And even a wrecked tank is a plus in the invaluable treasury of knowledge about the capabilities of the new machine and the tactics of its application. Not a single training ground will give such knowledge.
    1. wanderer_032
      wanderer_032 15 June 2016 18: 24
      +3
      Quote: cebadores
      even a wrecked tank is a plus in the invaluable treasury of knowledge about the capabilities of the new machine and the tactics of its application. Not a single training ground will give such knowledge.


      Fair. But this is only when you yourself are not in this tank.
  32. Kudrevkn
    Kudrevkn 15 June 2016 21: 02
    0
    A video was posted on Anna New - did the barmaley really hit the T-90 and even seized it, and even brought in a "wrecked" tank and drove it to their warehouse for "repair"? They immediately posted it on the network and ... received a blow from our Aerospace Forces, "as a result of which the tank itself and the ammunition depot were destroyed"! So it really is or not - you judge! Yours sincerely, KNK.
    1. Skubudu
      Skubudu 15 June 2016 22: 49
      0
      Anna News only repeats this video.
  33. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 15 June 2016 23: 02
    0
    It’s interesting to Mena why they didn’t shoot what happened to the tank, well, they hit, well, there was an explosion and, what’s next, the tank went away for cover and EVERYTHING is a fact of tank destruction ... well, even if they knocked out him, what they want to prove with this is that the tank can be destroyed, and this is understandable, although it may not be clear to fools.
  34. romex1
    romex1 15 June 2016 23: 31
    0
    soon they will show the tank they hit and say, "Well, now, the reactive armor was scratched, barmaley"
  35. Skubudu
    Skubudu 15 June 2016 23: 31
    -1
    Already a few videos of TOW missiles entering the T-90, but the firing of smoke grenades has never worked, as a reaction to laser irradiation.
    By the way, KBM would not have been asshole and would have equipped the Syrian T-90s with its Arena KAZ and tested it in battle, which would have allowed it to be modernized, etc. If successful, they would have received a bunch of orders from T-90 user countries
  36. tatarin37
    tatarin37 16 June 2016 22: 07
    0
    give me at least a miracle of technology that is not victorious; I’m a doldon, I’ll pass or break it anyway.
    And the tank left the ammunition didn’t explode, I think it’s cool after a butt