Military Review

Media: German special forces deployed to the north of Syria

43
TV channel Al-Mayadin citing sources published information that in the province of Aleppo (Syria) German Special Forces soldiers deployed. They joined the French and US Special Forces operating in the city manbij area where continued active combat operations against the militants so-called "Islamic State." The report said "several dozens of soldiers armed forces of Germany," which is scheduled to be operating in the area Tishrin power.


Media: German special forces deployed to the north of Syria


Noteworthy is the fact that representatives of western countries say about trying to cut off the militants LIH from receiving aid and reinforcements from Turkey. That is the goal pursued declarative representatives of NATO armies involved in the military operation in manbij area.

Such statements, the representatives of the Western Command in fact recognize that LIH has links with the forces on the territory of Turkey. This is particularly interesting against the background of yesterday's announcement by the Pentagon chief Ashton Carter, who in an interview with the Turkish Minister of Defense announced US readiness to help Turkey as "international terrorism" and "in the face of Russian aggression."

Meanwhile, the information portal AMN reports on the success of the Syrian army in the Aleppo area. Syrian soldiers managed to repel the militants locality Zeytan that those captured recently. As a result of the fight about 20 militants were killed, more 20 injured. All of them were part of the terrorist group "Al-Nusra Dzhebhat".
Photos used:
the UAF YouTube-channel
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avvg
    avvg 15 June 2016 06: 25
    +6
    Finally, the successes of the Syrian government forces, with the support of the Russian Aerospace Forces, forced the American coalition to open a second front, the story repeats itself.
    1. Simpsonian
      Simpsonian 15 June 2016 06: 28
      +16
      Maybe at least Germany and France asked permission from Syria?
      1. electrooleg
        electrooleg 15 June 2016 07: 09
        +5
        Quote: Simpsonian
        Maybe at least Germany and France asked permission from Syria?


        What for? Everyone knows that NATO can do everything, always and everywhere. When one day they get it for soup, then I think they will be very surprised. :)
    2. Finches
      Finches 15 June 2016 06: 33
      +8
      In all this fuss, besides the military-political component, there is also an economic one - who will control the oil-bearing areas that are now controlled by ISIS ... I think that this is the main question of this whole mess ... So to say, the economic basis of the political superstructure! laughing
      1. Ami du peuple
        Ami du peuple 15 June 2016 07: 07
        +6
        Quote: Finches
        who will control the oil areas that are currently controlled by ISIS.
        Quote: from the message
        ..to the province of Aleppo (Syria) fighters of German special forces were deployed.
        Aleppo has no oil or gas fields. All significant hydrocarbon deposits are located in the east and northeast of Syria. Attention, the question is: what in the north-west of the SAR are NATO commandos doing?
        1. Finches
          Finches 15 June 2016 10: 09
          +1
          I know about it - I generally wrote! The NATO Special Operations Forces, as well as the Qatari guys, have been working in Syria since 2011 and work throughout the territory! So it can be an ordinary rotation - only more public!
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. siberalt
      siberalt 15 June 2016 07: 07
      +2
      So what? French "special forces" also sailed to Syria on an aircraft carrier. And where is he? laughing
      1. Finches
        Finches 15 June 2016 17: 11
        0
        Special Forces, and then Special Forces - so that few would know about him! Even such a respected resource, like IN!
    5. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 15 June 2016 07: 10
      +7
      Quote: avvg
      forced the American coalition to open a second front, history repeats itself.

      What are the second front? Did I miss something?
      Yesterday US Secretary of Defense Promises Turkey "Support in the Face of Russian Aggression"
    6. Delink
      Delink 15 June 2016 07: 42
      +3
      If ours hadn’t been seduced by SaSha’s proposal and continued to bomb, now there would be nothing to talk about. The Americans would have to negotiate with us. And so we merge once again our victory.
    7. Andrey K
      Andrey K 15 June 2016 07: 53
      +9
      Quote: avvg
      Finally, the successes of the Syrian government forces, with the support of the Russian Aerospace Forces, forced the American coalition to open a second front, the story repeats itself.

      Probably disappointing you, but the success of the CAA on the front of the fight against terrorism is the tenth thing for the coalition. They put their flags where resources can be controlled. Water, oil, the border with Turkey ... They do not climb into the war with ISIS where there is nothing to profit from. You did not notice request
    8. weksha50
      weksha50 15 June 2016 09: 37
      +3
      Quote: avvg
      Finally, the successes of the Syrian government forces, with the support of the Russian Air Force, forced the American coalition open a second front,


      We, Russia, do not need such a second front ... And Syria (more precisely, Assad) - too ...

      You can see for yourself what a double and even triple policy is being pursued by the United States and its henchmen ... This "second front" is being created with a single goal: to prevent Assad and Russia from crushing the so-called opposition ...
  2. Sars
    Sars 15 June 2016 06: 32
    +1
    What was transferred from Germany. The Germans have no BTA aircraft in working condition. Lufthansa?
    1. Thunderbolt
      Thunderbolt 15 June 2016 06: 56
      +1
      Quote: SarS
      The Germans have no BTA aircraft in working condition. Lufthansa?
      In all 3 squadrons couldn’t find a transporter? However, the special forces are not proud, they can fly to the VIP laughing
      1. Sars
        Sars 15 June 2016 07: 02
        0
        Quote: Thunderbolt
        In all 3 squadrons could not find a transporter?

        The Germans could not evacuate their contingent from Afghanistan - there was nothing.
    2. Aaron Zawi
      Aaron Zawi 15 June 2016 07: 40
      +6
      Quote: SarS
      What was transferred from Germany. The Germans have no BTA aircraft in working condition. Lufthansa?

      Is that important. I think that the command of the SSN of Germany only rejoiced at the opportunity to test their elite in combat conditions after the withdrawal from Afghanistan. Not all furry and herbivores are there at all.
  3. Yak28
    Yak28 15 June 2016 06: 42
    +10
    NATO's goal in Syria is not a fight against bandits, I think that the United States wants to grab a piece of land from Syria, where they will train a pocket president and a "moderate" opposition. It seems to me that NATO members will not leave their positions in Syria even after the end of the war, their it is necessary to somehow pick out from there, or Syria will forever lose part of its territory and will have a constant hotbed of tension.
    1. cap
      cap 15 June 2016 06: 52
      +2
      Quote: Yak28
      NATO's goal in Syria is not a fight against bandits, I think that the United States wants to grab a piece of land from Syria, where they will train a pocket president and a "moderate" opposition. It seems to me that NATO members will not leave their positions in Syria even after the end of the war, their it is necessary to somehow pick out from there, or Syria will forever lose part of its territory and will have a constant hotbed of tension.


      To "defend" Syria, to put your own man instead of H. Assad, and then not deny yourself anything (oil first of all).
      This is the main task. The words about helping Erdogan are simply a cover for his far-reaching plans.
      That something like this. hi
      1. Igor39
        Igor39 15 June 2016 06: 57
        +3
        Now there B. Assad, if Th.
  4. Alexander 3
    Alexander 3 15 June 2016 06: 45
    +2
    It is necessary not to cut off the supply of barmaley from Turkey, but to cut off what Erdogan is.
  5. samarin1969
    samarin1969 15 June 2016 06: 52
    +4
    Syria is being torn into "sectors of responsibility." Someone will get oil fields, someone will get a desert. It looks like the desperate offensive of the SAA and K in the direction of Raqqa is an attempt to stake out more territory.
    In any case, the Franco-American-German "second front" is unlikely to delight Assad.
  6. Holsten
    Holsten 15 June 2016 07: 00
    +3
    Against this backdrop, Ashton Carter’s statement at a NATO meeting on Turkey’s support against (!) Russian aggression is very interesting. Apparently he meant that Russia is seizing the original Turkish lands that ended up in Syria?
    1. bovig
      bovig 15 June 2016 17: 14
      0
      Such statements, the representatives of the Western Command in fact recognize that LIH has links with the forces on the territory of Turkey. This is particularly interesting against the background of yesterday's announcement by the Pentagon chief Ashton Carter, who in an interview with the Turkish Minister of Defense announced US readiness to help Turkey as "international terrorism" and "in the face of Russian aggression."

      It becomes more and more difficult for sworn "partners" to lie believably! Contradictions are already creeping out into all the cracks ...)))
      Quote: Holsten
      Against this backdrop, Ashton Carter’s statement at a NATO meeting on Turkey’s support against (!) Russian aggression is very interesting. Apparently he meant that Russia is seizing the original Turkish lands that ended up in Syria?

      "Russian aggression" prevented the overthrow of Assad and the establishment of his own puppet regime, now there is a task to stake out the controlled zones of instability ...
  7. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 15 June 2016 07: 09
    +1
    Quote: Simpsonian
    Maybe at least Germany and France asked permission from Syria?

    It is undemocratic and intolerant! Syria must understand that they bring democracy and prosperity, so the Ukrainians understand and therefore jump, probably with delight!
  8. 31rus2
    31rus2 15 June 2016 07: 10
    +2
    Dear, write everything correctly, only the partition of Syria has already taken place, you yourself see the insolent actions of both the United States and NATO, with the quiet silence of our Foreign Ministry and Defense Ministry, so everything is according to the "plan"
    1. Sars
      Sars 15 June 2016 07: 21
      +2
      Quote: 31rus2
      Dear, write everything correctly, only the partition of Syria has already taken place, you yourself see the insolent actions of both the United States and NATO, with the quiet silence of our Foreign Ministry and Defense Ministry, so everything is according to the "plan"

      It seems to be so.
      Ours are now fulfilling their minimum program - to maintain a specific enclave for Assad.
      Shoigu was in Iran. It seems that the Iranians today will be content with the same small. Their task now is to get out of the sanctions, which are somewhat different from the Russian ones, and to modernize the army. Well, then we'll see.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. ovod84
    ovod84 15 June 2016 07: 15
    -2
    I hope in this city that the igil will be able to inflict losses on the Germans in the lagoons and the Yankees. I really hope so
    1. Sars
      Sars 15 June 2016 07: 23
      -1
      Quote: ovod84
      I hope the igil will be able to inflict losses on the Germans lagoons and Yankees. I really hope so

      Wow friend Isil leaked to the site. Why don’t you say that Allah Akbar?
      1. ovod84
        ovod84 15 June 2016 08: 57
        0
        I have personal scores with ishil so see false charges
  11. sergeyzzz
    sergeyzzz 15 June 2016 07: 21
    +2
    Are the bearded men over? Or do they want to squeeze a piece of Syria from such methods? So, it will soon be profitable for the bandits to supply good weapons, less harm from them laughing
  12. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 15 June 2016 07: 33
    +1
    Pleased with the successes of the Syrian army. And, as for the special forces, be it German, French, or State, then there’s practically no sense in them. They signify their presence in order to loudly declare at a certain time that they actively and triumphantly fought ISIS, and Russia, at best, brought cartridges.
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 15 June 2016 09: 14
      +1
      Well, the Americans, for example, in Manbij already have Chinooks and Blackhawks, and Apaches and even Osprey drive.

      The city itself is blocked, and the offensive goes further. Everyone was waiting for the assault on Manbij, but he is not there yet. But the advance to the West goes to the Al-Bab-Al-Rai line. Another question is how the SDF will behave in contact with the Syrian Army, which will be the other day.
  13. L. A. A.
    L. A. A. 15 June 2016 07: 43
    +4
    The Germans are fighting - words are very unpleasant for a Russian person.
  14. 3vs
    3vs 15 June 2016 07: 46
    +2
    As I understand it, the arrogant Saxons set the task of creating a separatist region in Syria that is not controlled by the Syrian government.
  15. romex1
    romex1 15 June 2016 08: 04
    +2
    Quote: Simpsonian
    Maybe at least Germany and France asked permission from Syria?


    they are exclusive do not talk nonsense. when did they ask someone?
  16. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 15 June 2016 08: 18
    +4
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    Attention, the question is: what in the north-west of the SAR are NATO commandos doing?

    The answer is that they hinder the use of the Russian aerospace forces in the area!
  17. brr1
    brr1 15 June 2016 09: 39
    +2
    I'm afraid to tell this news to my grandfather-veteran. Suddenly he will join ISIS after this.
    1. 0255
      0255 15 June 2016 10: 05
      -1
      Quote: brr1
      I'm afraid to tell this news to my grandfather-veteran. Suddenly he will join ISIS after this.

      Do not write nonsense. I look half of the site’s commentators fell in love with ISIS for shooting homosexuals in Orlando and for the fact that Ishilov may have to fight with NATO special forces fool Thus, likening to the Ukrainian Svidomo, who fell in love with the Islamists with the start of the Russian Aerospace Forces operation in Syria.
      1. 31rus2
        31rus2 15 June 2016 10: 26
        0
        Dear, it’s just you who are dramatic, how do you feel about this news? It was clear from the very beginning of our participation in Syria that Russia alone could not defeat Daesh, we needed joint efforts, probably the division of Syria became this very condition, in another way ? Our whole region is hostile, and starting a full-scale war is tantamount to shooting ourselves. We did what we could, alas we are not the USSR
        1. samoletil18
          samoletil18 15 June 2016 10: 58
          0
          In any case, Russia destroys ISIS and their assistants. If ISIS and others destroy all these democratic special forces, I see no reason to grieve. I will be the Foreign Ministry: yes, I will certainly express my condolences, I will be a fig, but they will have to thank Russia and express gratitude.
          But we will beat only terrorists. They shoot at our planes. Well, they will shoot at these silhouettes of commandos. And if they don’t, then the conclusions are clear who is for whom.
      2. brr1
        brr1 15 June 2016 11: 15
        0
        Don't be armored
      3. brr1
        brr1 15 June 2016 15: 07
        0
        Don't be armored
  18. potapych
    potapych 15 June 2016 12: 38
    0
    again, Deutschland is occupied stop
  19. Sars
    Sars 15 June 2016 15: 25
    0
    Quote: ovod84
    I have personal scores with ishil so see false charges

    So you if the enemy igil rejoice that people came to fight instead of you, and do not say all sorts of rubbish.
  20. The comment was deleted.
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. The comment was deleted.
  28. The comment was deleted.