Military Review

And Lenin is such a network

85
The intellectual proletariat is more explosive than its predecessors.

Destructive forces can straddle the protest moods of the class of social transformations and lead its mass demonstrations. The country's leadership needs to take extraordinary measures of control over the situation.

In the past few years, the theory and practice of hybrid wars has been actively discussed. The idea is to create in advance the enemy’s own “army”, built on the network principle, with the help of which, directly, without first crushing the armed forces, crush the current regime. And then to disorganize and weaken the security system (armed forces, special services, law enforcement agencies) of the victim country to the level acceptable to the winner (up to complete disbandment), take control of its economy and, if necessary, occupy the territory under the guise of a peacekeeping operation. That is, to wage a hybrid war we need not regular troops, but a different force: anti-government and anti-state formations, which in most cases are disguised as so-called civil society.

Actors and performers

Such a "civilian army" is a very complex formation. There are a community of employees of the enemy intelligence services and recruited by them, representatives of the elites of the victim country, who act (consciously or because of stupid frondism) agents of influence and lobbyists of the interests of the aggressor, an open political opposition that reflects the interests of a foreign customer ).

“Power elites underestimate the measure of danger. “The professorship is not capable of anything except talk, and the students will start up and go away.”
However, the “civilian army” alone cannot defeat the state — it is too small in number, although it can hold key positions in power. What is needed is a quantitatively significant stratum of society capable of crushing the regime, acting as a powerful social force, surpassing the potential of that which the government possesses. Lenin spoke of a revolutionary class, in modern terms it is a class of social transformations. Only by securing intellectual superiority in such a stratum of society, at least in its most active strata, can the “civilian army” succeed.

Thus, the key condition for the implementation of hybrid aggression, and protection from it, ensuring the stability of society with a variety of political views and their carriers, often contradictory before antagonism, is maintaining a normal, controlled state of social change class. And first you need to decide what it is. For the criteria, we turn to stories.

The first classic revolutions were, of course, the British and French. Both marked the transition from feudalism to capitalism. The initiators and organizers were the elite strata of the emerging bourgeoisie and the part of the nobility that joined it, who shared its views. However, the "technical executors", the protest mass, which physically and overthrew absolutism, became the serfs and the urban artisan poor.

The revolutions of the beginning of the 20th century, above all the Great October Socialist, also had political organizers and the main driving forces. In the role of the first in Russia were the RSDLP (b) and allied political parties and movements. And the main driving force was the industrial proletariat, replacing the peasantry in this capacity (which was viewed as an ally, but driven organizationally, ideologically and intellectually).

Time chose them

Today is a different situation. In all more or less developed countries, the classical proletariat of the industrial era has declined significantly in number (in relative terms) and has lost the ability to be a leader of social transformations. He is being replaced by other layers. To be a force capable of large-scale social transformations, they must meet certain requirements.

The first is the absence of meaningful private property. Those with a good level of wealth, in the absolute majority are not ready to risk them, and therefore they are not able to act against the existing government. After all, this creates a threat of loss of well-being, loss of social status, but it may not give a significant improvement in the situation when the situation changes. The presence of significant private property makes a person extremely vulnerable to possible repression, even of a very limited scale. A different picture, if there is none: then there is nothing to lose, but there is hope for the best in the new system of social relations. In modern conditions, as in the twentieth century, these are mostly wage workers, including a certain part of the middle class.

Secondly, applicants for the role of transformative power should play a key role in social production. Only in this case can they have enough potential influence to effect meaningful social change. By stopping material production, the transducer layer activates other classes and groups. He is able to partially paralyze the activity of the authorities. And being, as a rule, the most important element in the structures of national security, it is able to thwart attempts to suppress protests by force.

Modern industrial production is largely automated. Those who work with such equipment must have a high level of education, their activity is essentially engineering. That is, a man of mental labor replaces the industrial proletarian. Pure intellectuals work in IT production. The activities of personnel (especially command) of the armed forces, special services and law enforcement agencies are also in fact intellectual. According to modern concepts, this is the sphere of social production of a specific product “security” and it is produced exclusively by the mentioned personnel.

Thirdly, the logic of the activity of this stratum should contribute to the emergence of collectivist tendencies. The key role here is played by the typology of labor relations. This requirement stems from the fact that mass actions assume that the protest community has a certain organizational potential, the ability of individuals to act in concert with others in accordance with a single goal. Such skills most often arise in joint work on solving a specific task.

It should be noted that large groups, whose activities are clearly coordinated, are involved in modern production in a somewhat complex way. The work of scientists, too, has long ceased to be a lot of singles. Developments are carried out by large teams, often by international “collaborations”. Collective work also takes place in education, medicine, not to mention industry and security. Even hackers work collectively.

Fourthly, the class of social transformations should have intellectual superiority in relation to other basic producing strata of society. This is due to the fact that the masses are involved in the protests. Leading positions in this conglomerate capture those layers whose representatives most clearly represent the situation in the country, the interests of the protesters, the goals and objectives arising from this, orient themselves in the diversity of political groups and ideas put forward by them, know how to choose one of them as a political leader, work out the best method and form of activity.

Approaching the three previous criteria, the community of workers in the intellectual sphere fully meets the fourth one. In the mass, it surpasses most of the representatives of the surviving industrial proletariat and peasantry.

They lacked the leader


It can be stated that in the society of any more or less developed state there is a segment of the population that meets the listed requirements. This is an intellectual proletariat. Some may not like this name. Well, it is easy to change it - after all, they do not argue about terms, but agree. However, if approached from strictly scientific positions, the intellectual proletariat most closely corresponds to the essence of this social class.

And Lenin is such a networkIn terms of social explosiveness, the intellectual proletariat significantly exceeds its predecessors: the industrial proletariat and the peasantry. It is determined by at least two factors. The first of these is that the measure of exploitation, expressed through the ratio of the surplus value created by the intellectual proletariat to the amount of its remuneration, is much higher than that of the industrial proletariat and the peasantry. Scientists, programmers, doctors, teachers, military and other intellectual proletarians are sometimes rewarded very generously. However, they are well aware that they produce incomparably more. This generates a feeling of dissatisfaction with the social situation. The second factor is that they (at least their avant-garde) are well aware that they intellectually surpass the bulk of the power elite. Moreover, they play a key role in the development of decisions by it - both indirectly (in particular, through the software of the ACS), and directly (through the preparation of options, forecasts, scenarios for persons with proper powers). The main conclusion from this is that if the industrial proletariat was part of the managerial elite even after the seizure of power, the intellectual is not required in any capacity.

Therefore, the organizers of the hybrid wars are counting on it. In any case, this is evidenced by the experience of the last three decades. But the power elites, leading politicians underestimate the measure of danger of the intellectual proletariat. “The professorship is not capable of anything except talk, and the students will start up and go away ...” Such phrases are heard on the sidelines quite often.

Some time ago a televised kid from Hong Kong showed up on television who, using Internet technologies, organized mass demonstrations in this particular area. Comparing his appearance with the brutal leaders of the revolutions of the past, the leader said that everyone, of course, was made by foreign special services. But it should be recalled that social networks are created by the same puny youths and now have a powerful influence on the minds of young people all over the world, including Russia. Such people crushed regimes during the "Arab Spring". Having made a coup, they, as a rule, left the political arena, and sometimes even life. However, this is no easier for the country: the enemy, having used the situation, has already solved his task.

We note the most important thing: such a large section of society in itself is a “civilian army” unable to move against the state and the authorities. To put them in motion, we need quite serious motives that can force large masses of people, under ordinary political conditions inert, to move to active political actions. And it almost always makes the regime itself, putting significant social strata into a position that they find completely unacceptable.

And there are always groups in society that claim to seize power and change the political system. They are not necessarily connected with foreign special services and act as their agents of influence, but using the situation, they can straddle (ideologically, organizationally, intellectually) the protest moods of the class of social transformations and lead its speeches. At the same time, the enemy special services, in turn, will seek to manipulate such groups until they achieve (according to circumstances) full control over them. In turn, the claimants to power use all possible resources, including support from outside, and in the future they often get rid of foreign guardianship. This succeeds, as a rule, for those groups that rely on a clear ideology recognized by the class of social transformations.

Russia has entered a deep confrontation with the West. Nuclear potential provides us with guarantees against large-scale war in its traditional form. Therefore, the main and only threat to us is a hybrid aggression, which is already being deployed. And the bet is placed precisely on the intellectual proletariat. Yes, while he is divided and does not realize his interests. However, there are plenty of those who want to consolidate it in order to put themselves in the service, including those who have a powerful material and information resource. Therefore, our leadership, first and foremost the president, needs to take control of the situation in this extremely important social stratum for the country.
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/31038
85 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 17 June 2016 18: 45
    +7
    Then excuse me, but at the moment we need a personality like Stalin!
    1. CORNET
      CORNET 17 June 2016 18: 58
      +13
      The intellectual proletariat is more explosive than its predecessors.

      We damn everything we remember ...... We will not wave our sabers anymore, as you think and hope! Everything will be quiet and without noise .... Stop making noise and chatting! And here's the main thing ... (the West this time will not save you and your children with the bills too) ...)))) Pray! bully Surrender is useless ..!. Got the devils .....
      1. 13 warrior
        13 warrior 17 June 2016 19: 33
        +43
        And why did you get the cons of Cornet?
        Someone delighted with the actions of the government? Does anyone like Chubais, Gref, Serdyukov and others like them?
        Who is satisfied with the increase in pensions by 4% and the salaries of "Duma husbands" by 40%?
        And what about the reduction and "optimization" of hospitals?
        Is everything in ecstasy from the quality of education?
        I am generally silent about the powerlessness of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Prosecutor's Office in relation to the current "elites".
        Well, etc.
        In general, if it burns, then I will not shed blood for these Elites.
        Now minus))
        1. Vladimir 1964
          Vladimir 1964 17 June 2016 19: 58
          +5
          Quote: 13 warrior
          And why did you get the cons of Cornet?
          Someone delighted with the actions of the government? Does anyone like Chubais, Gref, Serdyukov and others like them?
          Who is satisfied with the increase in pensions by 4% and the salaries of "Duma husbands" by 40%?
          And what about the reduction and "optimization" of hospitals?
          Is everything in ecstasy from the quality of education?
          I am generally silent about the powerlessness of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and the Prosecutor's Office in relation to the current "elites".
          Well, etc.
          In general, if it burns, then I will not shed blood for these Elites.
          Now minus))

          You know, 12 warrior, to be honest, did not pay attention to the commentary of "Kornet" due to the incomprehensibility of the presentation, but I absolutely agree with yours. soldier
          1. Pravdorub. 358
            Pravdorub. 358 17 June 2016 22: 32
            -8
            PUTIN EXCLUDED RUSSIA FROM NUMBER OF SUPERPOWER

            Russian President Vladimir Putin admitted that he considers the United States to be the only superpower in the world at the moment. He made such a statement on Friday, June 17, speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF), the Lenti.ru correspondent reports.

            “America is a great power. Today is probably the only superpower. We accept it", Said the Russian president.

            https://lenta.ru/news/2016/06/17/obamathegreat/?utm_source=rnews



            Eat, beefy!
          2. The comment was deleted.
        2. mostov70
          mostov70 17 June 2016 20: 55
          +2
          You will not believe that in the next forum, people are delighted with the monument to Manerheim and the Kadyrov bridge.
          1. Very old
            Very old 17 June 2016 22: 11
            +3
            Tell me, mostov, where, in which forum? And then I can’t believe something ...
          2. voronbel53
            voronbel53 17 June 2016 22: 21
            -3
            Learn history, not politics, but better - trade better ...
          3. vovanpain
            vovanpain 18 June 2016 04: 05
            +7
            Quote: mostov70
            Monument to Manerheim and the Kadyrov Bridge.

            Of course the Nemtsov bridge sounds nicer for you. No.
          4. Chak
            Chak 18 June 2016 09: 47
            0
            They say that there are more eggs in the neighboring bazaar, and they ask for less money, and they drink beer with raki ...
        3. Very old
          Very old 17 June 2016 22: 09
          +13
          13warrior: "... I will not shed blood for these Elites"

          Not a bloodthirsty, not aggressive, but ____ he would let them go, and let people condemn me,
          power is completely late (or not yet to the end?)
          fool am
          1. PHANTOM-AS
            PHANTOM-AS 18 June 2016 01: 20
            +3
            Quote: Very old
            Not a bloodthirsty, not aggressive, but ____ he would let them go, and let people condemn me,
            power is completely late (or not yet to the end?)

            The fact is that she was desperate, only the people are still in zombie-blinders, everything believes in the "kind" king, hopes for something.
            only God and the king and not the hero will give us deliverance ...
            It is necessary to understand that all the current government is anointed by one world and the president-member of this team.
            1. dauria
              dauria 18 June 2016 01: 32
              0
              only the people are still in zombo-blinkers, everything believes in the "kind" king,


              Here for words a warning from the "overseer" got it ...
              I will try without words. laughing
              1. iouris
                iouris 18 June 2016 12: 34
                +3
                This is an image of the structure of XNUMXth century bourgeois society. At the very top of the hierarchy is capital ("its preoccupation"), a soulless, non-personified factor.
            2. bastard
              bastard 18 June 2016 08: 55
              0
              Quote: PHANTOM-AS
              It is necessary to understand that all the current government is anointed by one world and the president-member of this team.

              Prezik is not just a member, he is in proportion.
        4. Bayonet
          Bayonet 17 June 2016 22: 31
          -1
          Quote: 13 warrior
          And why did you get the cons of Cornet?

          Isn’t it clear? Balabol is cocky! laughing
          1. CORNET
            CORNET 18 June 2016 00: 34
            +1
            Quote: Bayonet
            Quote: 13 warrior
            And why did you get the cons of Cornet?

            Isn’t it clear? Balabol is cocky! laughing

            You yourself bully .....! Catch, bayonet! hi
            1. Bayonet
              Bayonet 18 June 2016 06: 03
              0
              Quote: CORNET
              I'll catch you, bayonet!

              Come on, come on ... smile hi
            2. Alibekulu
              Alibekulu 18 June 2016 06: 50
              0
              Quote: CORNET
              I'll catch you, bayonet!
              Mehan is not enough for you "a bullet in the head", so you still have a bayonet in the bochin .. repeat
        5. voronbel53
          voronbel53 17 June 2016 23: 11
          0
          What am I talking about ..., - it is always easier to criticize than to do something in your piece of territory. All crimes are committed in all territories where the authorities are not respected, crime seizes her there, and then they run away again. “Where did you go to the authorities, Lenin didn’t advise anything bad, and if they went the wrong way, it’s not his fault,” fools took power, only slogans. Blame yourself and on today's rulers in the Locations - as they do - and kushait, but Putin is trying to fix everything, and he will have to fix all the system errors. Believe him, people! ..
          1. PHANTOM-AS
            PHANTOM-AS 18 June 2016 01: 24
            +3
            Quote: voronbel53
            but Putin is trying to fix everything, and he will have to fix all the system errors. Believe him, people! ..

            puzzling, hard case, what to believe in doubling the gdp, in amphoras, or in the fact that he is a liberal?
          2. bastard
            bastard 18 June 2016 09: 17
            -2
            Quote: voronbel53
            Putin is trying to fix everything, and he will have to fix all system errors

            He’s trying so hard, trying so hard!
            Quote: voronbel53
            Believe him, people! ..

            As you know, Kant said that faith can only be in two cases: if it is confirmed by practical experience and can predict the outcome.
            Regarding faith, this is about priests. All that I see from the moment Putin came to power (or rather, brought) to power is a very neat dismantling of the state and, as a result, the well-known rechormas of education, health, police, police, etc. Everything is done very smoothly, stretched out over time , and people, more precisely, the electorate, are thrown bones such as Crimea-Syria-Donbass, the fight against smokers, drunks, drug addicts and other planned events. For example: The pursuit of Gelik with majorities set a precedent for the introduction of completely wild fines for the so-called aggressive driving. That is: set off with the axle box - money (considerable) to the cashier. This law will be adopted, then brought to the point of absurdity. People will swallow, as always.
      2. russkiy redut
        russkiy redut 17 June 2016 21: 26
        -7
        If you go then only against large oligarchs such as Gref, Chubais, as well as remove ministers of ecology and education. Unfortunately, Putin is forced to reckon with them, so he needs the support of the people so that their capital can be nationalized. Look, as soon as the people in front say down with Dima iPhone, they will remove him.
        1. PHANTOM-AS
          PHANTOM-AS 18 June 2016 01: 26
          +1
          Quote: russkiy redut
          such as Gref, Chubais, as well as remove ministers of ecology and education. Unfortunately, Putin is forced to reckon with them, so he needs the support of the people.

          In addition to his support, he has powers vested in him by the people, which not every sheikh has.
    2. Dimontius
      Dimontius 17 June 2016 19: 44
      +6
      Yes, everything is simple! social economy is strong - protest sentiment is weak. Show the student the future - it will plow, leave it in limbo - get uncontrolled bursts, including due to influence from outside. What you really need to spare no money and ruthlessly control is the education and employment system. In the meantime, we rely on the patriotism and adherence of our people, which, thanks to the victories of our ancestors, is higher than anyone else. As for network technologies, you won’t be fed up with them, so they are secondary, of course they should not be underestimated, but we have special services for this.
      1. Altona
        Altona 17 June 2016 20: 15
        +8
        Quote: Dimontius
        Yes, everything is simple! social economy is strong - protest sentiment is weak.

        -----------------------
        That's right, my friend. Here, many people live by the principle "as if something weren't." And what about the residents of 300 single-industry towns and 100000 villages? Here I am one of them. Tell me what to do then? Where should I contact the authorities so that the ehfect was unavoidably before our problem? It's like 15 million extra people. Let's go according to Gaidar, "did not fit into the market" and that's it. Cut and forget.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 17 June 2016 20: 35
          -4
          Agriculture is only involved.
          1. Altona
            Altona 17 June 2016 21: 50
            +10
            Quote: Vadim237
            Agriculture is only involved.

            --------------------
            Okay, Vadim. You are not a poor person with us, I will publish a list of the necessary fertilizers, seeds, equipment, crop insurance, land rent. Will you pay Can you tell me where else to sell it?
            PS It’s easy to give advice on what you have no idea. Yes, our villages are half empty, everyone left for Moscow and Surgut to earn money. Agriculture. And the former agricultural enterprises abandoned their lands long ago, there weeds or birch forests are growing. No, of course there is someone who works, but in comparison with Tatarstan, we stand still.
            1. Vadim237
              Vadim237 17 June 2016 22: 40
              +2
              With its own kind, agriculture. "It's easy to give advice about what you have no idea about" - I have - my friends are engaged in the Volgograd region, 100 dairy cows - sell milk in the region and I must say that they are not in poverty at all.
      2. weksha50
        weksha50 17 June 2016 20: 21
        +2
        Quote: Dimontius
        What you really need to spare no money and ruthless control is on the education system and employment.


        It seems that Putin today spoke out that education will now be given priority ...

        Honestly, I was somewhat shocked ... After so many years of intensive collapse of education - and in a friend such a message ... But he didn’t open it (promise), but it would be interesting to know what he meant by that .. .
        1. mostov70
          mostov70 17 June 2016 20: 57
          +3
          It seems that Putin today spoke out that education will now be given priority ...- but here it became scary what else would be thought of.
        2. 34 region
          34 region 17 June 2016 22: 00
          +3
          Veksha50! 20.21. Really interesting question. What kind of education? Private or general free?
          1. Very old
            Very old 17 June 2016 22: 19
            +9
            20 years ruined the best education system
            Will it be possible to restore it?
            No! (No doubt about that)
            1. iouris
              iouris 18 June 2016 00: 42
              +3
              What is falling apart does not lie down in recovery.
            2. sherp2015
              sherp2015 18 June 2016 07: 49
              +2
              Quote: Very old
              20 years ruined the best education system
              Will it be possible to restore it?
              No! (No doubt about that)


              Under the current government and the Duma, of course, NO
          2. weksha50
            weksha50 17 June 2016 22: 49
            +4
            Quote: Region 34
            Veksha50! 20.21. Really interesting question. What kind of education? Private or general free?



            I emphasized that the question was raised generally, without being disclosed ... So I say that I was shocked that he had touched on this topic from this perspective ... And what did he mean?

            It seems to me that everything has already been done so that there is nobody and nothing to return the old education system ... What is the general secondary, that primary, secondary, higher professional ... Craftsmen, damn it ...
        3. PHANTOM-AS
          PHANTOM-AS 18 June 2016 01: 32
          +2
          Quote: weksha50
          After so many years of intensive collapse of education - and in a friend such a message ... But he didn’t disclose it (message), but it would be interesting to know what he meant by that ...

          It is already the 16th year that there are only messages, messages, straight lines, meaningful phrases, meaningful silence, foggy craps.
          After all, I'm already fed up !!! am
          1. Vasiliy16
            Vasiliy16 18 June 2016 02: 17
            +3
            Quote: PHANTOM-AS
            It seems that Putin today spoke out that education will now be given priority ...

            16 years ago, he already said that.
            If he had done at least half of what he said, we would have lived in a completely different way.
        4. The comment was deleted.
    3. Denis Obukhov
      Denis Obukhov 17 June 2016 21: 40
      +2
      After reading the article, I understood it this way: the author decided to somewhat modernize the basic, and, in general, well-known and rather banal provisions of historical materialism created by the unforgettable trinity. Alas, the author clearly will not pull on the role of a classic. If only because on these topics innumerable assemblages of modern authors draw a bagpipe, but, which is significant, each to his own melody ... And one more thing. I am not able to comprehend the author’s logic: he directly admits that the basis of the current mess in society is, in general, quite objective reasons - social tension, social disorder, economic problems ... In short, all this is bad, very badly. But to fight this and try to make life better is also very bad. So what do you do? Explain to me one of the normal ...
    4. 34 region
      34 region 17 June 2016 21: 57
      +6
      Banishing liberoids! 18.45. In general, the author wrote complete nonsense! What was the proletariat in Russia? A small percentage. Who made the revolution of February 17th? You can say the army. Who made the revolution in October? Russian General Staff. And where is the proletariat? The plan for the capture of Petrograd developed simple workers? And so competently! Okay. We will not argue about this. Who made the coup in the USSR in the years 91-93? Have the workers developed a plan to seize power? Okay. We drove through. Take the outskirts. Who removed Yanukovych? Are the workers really? About Stalin. Stalin accepted the country that he accepted. Clever man! Although it is also possible to make a claim. What so long calved and did not crush enemies at once? Why did you constantly consult with everyone? Why did enemies and their children survive to the 90s? And of course yes! Very smart friend! Raise the country after one devastation, after the second! Which of today's leaders has improved this result? There were prisons! But in tsarist Russia they were not? Judged the leaders! But is the leadership incompetent? The prisoners worked! And they had to rest and improve their health? Choked private business! There were no collective farms and artels?
    5. Barakuda
      Barakuda 17 June 2016 22: 50
      0
      K. Marx, the author read - no? Then in the GARDEN ...
    6. iouris
      iouris 18 June 2016 00: 41
      +2
      Where do people like Stalin come from, we know very little. And the proletariat - it is the proletariat. His job is to be the grave digger of the bourgeoisie. However, the class cannot revolutionize and take power. Revolution requires objective and subjective factors. The subjective factor is not only a person. Especially not Stalin. Stalin comes only to head the organization and create his own project.
  2. I doubt it
    I doubt it 17 June 2016 18: 46
    +16
    "Therefore, our leadership, first of all the president, needs ..."

    They already need so much.
    I don’t want to do anything at all ....
    1. larand
      larand 17 June 2016 20: 19
      +9
      Quote: I doubt it
      "Therefore, our leadership, first of all the president, needs ..."
      They already need so much.
      I don’t want to do anything at all ....


      In my opinion, it would be more correct "They already have so much of everything they need ...".
      And what did Mr. Sivkov mean "... the president needs to take control of the situation"? As under the tsar - the National Guard with whips on the proletarians? Or remove Yeltsin's fosterlings who are still in power?
    2. PHANTOM-AS
      PHANTOM-AS 18 June 2016 01: 54
      0
      The trouble is that those who are now in power also studied Marxism-Leninism, so they are doing everything to separate the people. Having destroyed a colossal share of industry, they also destroyed the proletariat who worked at these enterprises.
      The present kulaks and the petty bourgeoisie are more likely counter-revolutionary than revolutionary.
      And here, in the midst of the day, the self-organization of wage laborers arises, either through the formation of new (not pocket) trade unions, or some cells, and of these, the parties of the new proletariat.
      It is necessary to rely on Marxist-Leninist-Stalinist teachings, appealing to the new realities of oligarch-feudal bureaucratic capitalism.
      "Leninism is not Lenin's teaching minus Marxism. Leninism is
      Marxism of the era of imperialism and proletarian revolutions. In other words, Leninism
      includes everything that is given by Marx, plus the new that Lenin introduced into
      the treasury of Marxism and what necessarily follows from all that is given
      Marx (doctrine of the dictatorship of the proletariat, peasant question, national
      question, party, question of the social roots of reformism, question of basic
      deviations in communism, etc.) ".
      ("On the tasks of the Komsomol" vol. 7, p. 247.)
      V.I. Stalin
  3. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 17 June 2016 18: 46
    +13
    Sivkov, in its repertoire ... "Kabardin Nambar Tu" is not a new idea: to shut up the "marginal strata of society", and "Happiness" will be for the oligarchy ... fuck you dear tovarisch! or is it better to say mister? Lenin, after all, dominated justice, but what is happening now is "chaos" in a beautiful mask ...
    1. PHANTOM-AS
      PHANTOM-AS 18 June 2016 02: 28
      +5
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      .. "kabardin nambar tu

      Incidentally, Yurich, I advise you to read Kabardin’s blogs here and in LJ, but he is still young about 30, but he is quite adequate and he will definitely come to Leninism.
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      Lenin, after all, dominated justice, but what is happening now is "chaos" in a beautiful mask ...

      Leninism is the only theory of the proletarian revolution and the dictatorship of the proletariat in the world that has been put into practice and further developed in the Stalin era. All other teachings and parties are deceit (to put it mildly)
      Lenin also warned of a continuous class struggle and of the possible victory of the counter-revolution. In the late 80s and early 90s, the bourgeois counter-revolution defeated, respectively, and the state created by the bourgeoisie will serve the class of the bourgeoisie, but not the people, this must be clearly understood.
      It is clear that the counter-revolution will be followed by a proletarian (people's) revolution again, this process is inevitable, like the sunrise, but this is what our "gentlemen" are very afraid of.
      Trying to foist people a bogey dummy in the form of fictitious enemies, kaklov, yankers, nato, b .... Belarsky clubs, Poles, Baltic states, aliens, neighbors in the parking lot, in the stairwell, the 125th column, etc., thereby the bourgeoisie takes itself out from under the blow, although it is the true enemy of the people of wage labor (proletarians), and of the people as a whole.
      "The revolution cannot satisfy everyone and everything. It always has one end
      satisfies the working masses, at the other end beats secret and overt enemies
      of these masses.
      Therefore, we must choose: either together with the workers and the peasant poor
      for the revolution, or together with the capitalists and landowners against the revolution. "
      ("On the Provisional Government" v.3 p.42.)
      V.I. Stalin.
  4. sergey2017
    sergey2017 17 June 2016 19: 01
    -1
    Very true! Therefore, our leadership, especially the president, needs to take the information resource under control in the social layer - this is extremely important for Russia! If our youth on the Internet were more interested in the Military Review, it would be very instructive!
  5. Altona
    Altona 17 June 2016 19: 04
    +19
    Well, I am also a kind of "intellectual proletarian", I can write in public, troll, reveal flaws and just formulate thoughts. So what? Yes, I do not accept the current state of affairs and consider it illegal, no matter what the GDP says about the "inviolability of the results of privatization." Yes, I am ready to take a place in any new governing body in the event of a de-bourgeois revolution and revenge of true democracy. I believe that the current course is a road to a dead end, and the current consensus at the top is the division of the country according to Yeltsin's will. ALL!
    1. CORNET
      CORNET 17 June 2016 19: 09
      -7
      Quote: Altona
      Well, I am also a kind of "intellectual proletarian", I can write in public, troll, reveal flaws and just formulate thoughts. So what? Yes, I do not accept the current state of affairs and consider it illegal, no matter what the GDP says about the "inviolability of the results of privatization." Yes, I am ready to take a place in any new governing body in the event of a de-bourgeois revolution and revenge of true democracy. I believe that the current course is a road to a dead end, and the current consensus at the top is the division of the country according to Yeltsin's will. ALL!

      Shut up....!
      1. 34 region
        34 region 17 June 2016 22: 22
        +3
        Cornet! 19.09/XNUMX. And what's wrong with the comments?
    2. Verdun
      Verdun 17 June 2016 19: 39
      +6
      Quote: Altona
      Well, I am also a kind of "intellectual proletarian"

      This word was given to all - the proletariat. A coup can be carried out by any oppressed class that is in the majority. It doesn’t matter who the majority will be, truckers or network administrators.
      1. dr.star75
        dr.star75 17 June 2016 20: 13
        +3
        "Any oppressed class in the majority can carry out a coup." No. Can not. As V. I. Ulyanov said, any revolution is worthwhile only when it can defend itself.
        1. 34 region
          34 region 17 June 2016 22: 29
          +2
          Dr.star75! 20.13. That is true. If revolutions were bourgeois, then the bourgeoisie is the most oppressed class! Cool logic at Verdun! So what professions have made the Verdun Revolution? Hall help! Yes! Gorbachev, too, was the most oppressed ?! The oligarchs of the outskirts are also the most oppressed? Especially Poroshenko! Generally an outcast rebelled against!
        2. Verdun
          Verdun 17 June 2016 22: 35
          +2
          Quote: dr.star75
          As V.I. Ulyanov said, every revolution stands only when it can defend itself.

          When Vladimir Ilyich wrote about this, there were no nuclear warheads. And even then it was clear how important it was to have support in the ranks of the army and navy.
          . If revolutions were bourgeois, then the bourgeoisie is the most oppressed class! Cool logic at Verdun!
          You confuse oppression and exploitation. Oppression is when you are not allowed to fulfill what you want, to live according to your needs. At the same time, the actions of Gorbachev or the oligarchs cannot be called a revolution. After all, they did not rely on the oppressed masses, did not act in their interests, but simply deceived them. A criminal conspiracy is yes.
        3. saygon66
          saygon66 17 June 2016 23: 34
          +1
          - And if so: "The coup can be carried out by any part of society, capable of self-organizing and funding ..."
          - That's better?
      2. weksha50
        weksha50 17 June 2016 20: 29
        +1
        Quote: Verdun
        This word was given to all - the proletariat. A coup can be carried out by any oppressed class that is in the majority. It doesn’t matter who the majority will be, truckers or network administrators.


        Um ... Sivkov, as always, in his role ...

        In general, the term "intellectual proletarian" and the allegedly arising from him the danger of overthrowing the existing system is interesting ... I will most likely believe that a long-distance truck driver, miner, turner, etc. will take arms in his hands. and will go to overthrow the government, rather than what it will be done by the intellectual worker ...

        And during the October Revolution, the intellectuals — the transponders, the most passionate of them — incited and sent the proletarians and peasants into battle, but their fighters were none, zero ...

        And poorly Sivkov studied the theory of the state, for this reason he correlates the military and other representatives of power structures to intellectuals to the heap ...

        Since time immemorial, power structures have been, above all, a mechanism for supporting and protecting the existing government, or rather, the state. And then the fifth column will be sooo hard to develop ...
  6. Gardamir
    Gardamir 17 June 2016 19: 22
    +15
    our leadership, especially the president, needs to take control of the situation
    And they do not care about us all. It was in Topwar that they should discuss how the rulers of Russia spat in the people. At first, in St. Petersburg, the bridge was named after Kadyrov Sr., without any referenda or polls. Well, Kadyrov first fought against us, then switched to our side. But the plaque in honor of the Nazi general is the height of cynicism. Yes, Mannerheim first served the Russian Tsar, but after the revolution he moved to Finland. And it was precisely the troops of Mannerheim that surrounded Leningrad; it was he who was responsible for the deaths of the besieged Leningrad.
    1. razmik72
      razmik72 17 June 2016 20: 10
      +2
      Quote: Gardamir
      our leadership, especially the president, needs to take control of the situation
      And they do not care about us all. It was in Topwar that they should discuss how the rulers of Russia spat in the people. At first, in St. Petersburg, the bridge was named after Kadyrov Sr., without any referenda or polls. Well, Kadyrov first fought against us, then switched to our side. But the plaque in honor of the Nazi general is the height of cynicism. Yes, Mannerheim first served the Russian Tsar, but after the revolution he moved to Finland. And it was precisely the troops of Mannerheim that surrounded Leningrad; it was he who was responsible for the deaths of the besieged Leningrad.

      I completely agree with you, I even raised this issue a few days ago, and a member of the forum Altona mockingly remarked that this is not my business, so that I shut up and not "buzz". And now he is ready to "lead" wink government, or in extreme cases, take any "position" in the newly formed government after the anti-bourgeois revolution laughing .
      1. Altona
        Altona 17 June 2016 21: 58
        -3
        Quote: razmik72
        I completely agree with you, I even raised this issue a few days ago, and the forum member Altona mockingly remarked that it’s not my business to shut up and not “buzz”. And now he is ready to “head” the government wink or in extreme case, take any "position" in the newly formed government after the anti-bourgeois revolution laughing

        ----------------
        What? Does the Armenian radio also have an opinion about our device? But what about the great-power war with Aliyev and Erdogan? Will the Armenian gut pull? Or will the damned Imperials help again? I will definitely not discuss with you what to do in Russia. So get down to Sargsyan, forum member Razmik72. Such is the new humiliating advice to you again.
        1. razmik72
          razmik72 17 June 2016 23: 02
          0
          Quote: Altona
          Quote: razmik72
          I completely agree with you, I even raised this issue a few days ago, and the forum member Altona mockingly remarked that it’s not my business to shut up and not “buzz”. And now he is ready to “head” the government wink or in extreme case, take any "position" in the newly formed government after the anti-bourgeois revolution laughing

          ----------------
          What? Does the Armenian radio also have an opinion about our device? But what about the great-power war with Aliyev and Erdogan? Will the Armenian gut pull? Or will the damned Imperials help again? I will definitely not discuss with you what to do in Russia. So get down to Sargsyan, forum member Razmik72. Such is the new humiliating advice to you again.

          You can shove your "bullying advice" in one place, clown.
          A few days ago, they so fiercely defended the installation of the "party and government", and now they are ready to head an anti-bourgeois government. The same guy under the nickname Lance corporal Valera, in the heat of a dispute, when discussing the role of Garegin Nzhdeh in the history of Armenia, himself admitted that he was an informer. Then he translated his words in jest, but the words have already been spoken:
          "And we will knock on the competent authorities."
          1. Altona
            Altona 17 June 2016 23: 54
            -1
            Quote: razmik72
            You can shove your "bullying advice" in one place, clown.
            A few days ago, they so fiercely defended the installation of the "party and government", and now they are ready to head an anti-bourgeois government. The same guy under the nickname Lance corporal Valera, in the heat of a dispute, when discussing the role of Garegin Nzhdeh in the history of Armenia, himself admitted that he was an informer. Then he translated his words in jest, but the words have already been spoken:
            "And we will knock on the competent authorities."

            -----------------------
            I am not advocating the "policy of the party and the government", do not confuse warm with sour. I see no point in discussing our business with someone from outside. That is, any Armenian, Israeli, Kazakh or someone else climbs to discuss our affairs. These are our affairs, not yours. Do your own, Armenian. Do not meddle with your advice and "nationalist leaders", most likely "matsainalist" ones. I asked you questions, Armenian friend. So discuss them. As for the organs, I don't cooperate with them, I don't care about them. They have an "E" department that monitors social networks and forums.
      2. Altona
        Altona 17 June 2016 23: 05
        +2
        Quote: razmik72
        I completely agree with you, I even raised this issue a few days ago, and the forum member Altona mockingly remarked that this is not my business, so that I would shut up and not "buzz".

        -------------------
        About the Armenian "buzz" by the way. Dear, answer a number of questions:
        1) Why is the leadership of NKR and Armenia drowning in small towns and corruption? Why does the head of the NKR have an extensive business, a cool fleet, and all this is actually in the war zone?
        2) Why did the Armenian leadership in all senses in Armenian oversleep the April war? What the hell is being asked? And they gave 800 hectares of their beautiful territory?
        3) Why is the Armenian leadership, in every sense, eking out financial assistance from Russia, Germany, the USA and France, which your non-poor diasporas are sending to NKR and Armenia?
        4) Why your soldiers do not have modern night vision devices, walkie-talkies with encryption, cartridges, helmets, machine guns, armored vehicles, medical equipment? Is it Putin and Russia to blame? Why did soldiers call their commanders on cell phones?
        5) Why did your diasporas, and not governments, have to urgently send the necessary equipment for the war and medical facilities to the NKR like the Russians in their time to the Donbass?
        So answer this, our Armenian friend. And then criticize Russia.
        1. razmik72
          razmik72 18 June 2016 09: 54
          -1
          All your questions can be answered briefly, because crooks and thieves have passed the natural selection and are sitting in the country's leadership, and I was even pleasantly surprised that you are such an informed person.
    2. SCHWERIN
      SCHWERIN 18 June 2016 00: 20
      0
      Mannerheim - a Swede, honestly served his homeland - the Russian Empire. He fought well, led an expedition to China. Russia wanted to know what was happening in this country. At the same time, he compiled military topographic maps of China.
      A revolution has happened. As a military man and loyal to his homeland, Russia, she was not accepted. Tried to organize resistance. His authority in the army and at court was high. But having met with people surrounding the royal family, I saw in them complete indifference to the fate of Russia. Due to the threat of arrest, he left Russia.
      Finland, after the arrival of Nicholas II, was dissatisfied with the attitude of the tsar towards the Finns, in comparison with the previous tsar, Alexander III, the father of Nicholas tried to separate from Russia. A civil war broke out in the country. White versus reds. Mannerheim began with his people to train and create a white army. He excelled in this matter. White won. The Red Finns betrayed by the Soviet regime lost.
      Mannerheim was against the repressions that the bourgeois authorities arranged for the losers. It is repression with concentration camps, bullying, etc. He believed that all white and red are Finnish people. And moved away from politics.
      Well, then 30 years. Again the choice. Or with the USSR or with Germany. Since the Finns wanted to break off relations with Russia, they naturally began to be friends with the Germans, but they wanted to accept help from them, but not lose their sovereignty.
      But the claw is stuck ...
      Finnish politicians, sensing that they could not keep the country, turned to Mannerheim. He agreed.
      Then the events in the village of Mainila, followed by the Winter War.
      By the way, Mannerheim supported the desire of the USSR to regain two lanas (regions of the Karelian Isthmus) that Tsar Alexander III gave them (like Nikita Crimea)
      In 41, the Finns attacked the USSR, reached the Sestra River (the Finnish border before the Winter War). They tried to move on, but ran into the "Stalin Line", built in advance. With machine guns and guns. With flooded water, icy slopes. Received and calmed down.
      Mannerheim resisted the German pressure in terms of the German offensive on Leningrad. What motivated them is the question. Expediency? Or the memory of his service in this city?
      Was he involved in war crimes? The genocide of civilians in Karelia? I think it’s unlikely. Personnel military man of honor. Yes, the enemy. But in Finland there were enough people, politicians who did not appear on the front lines, but to mock people, show themselves, probably there were a lot.
      Mannerheim’s personality is mixed. It is impossible to judge him by today's court. And it all depends on the judges.
      As for the plaque on the building of the military school. This is just a sign that a Russian general was studying here.
      By the way, in Vyborg, both in the city and in the suburbs, there are monuments and signs in Finnish and Russian dedicated to this time. And no one is outraged ....
  7. gladcu2
    gladcu2 17 June 2016 19: 24
    +6
    Thanks a lot.

    In general, the concept is correct, but there are two serious errors.

    First one. These people are like them, a project, what you mean. They will not kill production and destroy the economy. They will change the economic system by changing the foundation of society, MORAL. Turning everything upside down and vice versa is much easier than harming yourself by disrupting production.

    And the second mistake.

    The motivation of the protectorate is not that they are offended by insufficient income in comparison with their capabilities, but that the existing system does not make it possible to plan for the future. All the efforts of parents do not give the opportunity to plan the future for their children. This motivation is much higher than ephemeral earnings, which may be higher or lower, but you can put up with it. Since in essence it does not do the weather.
    1. gladcu2
      gladcu2 17 June 2016 20: 24
      +3
      By the way

      Do not think that I am so smart and came to all to do moralizing and change the moral.

      Everything is much simpler. Communication technology will change the social system. The revolution will turn out velvet and without violence. The Communists will only need to be worried that MORAL does not warp otherwise the consequences are not predictable.

      An example of how morality is changing in society through a project act.

      I do not know about the Russian segment of the Internet, I mostly "graze" in English-speaking sites.

      So here. Recently, statistics on wages have gone. The information is systematized and extremely detailed. Practically everything becomes known to a person who wants to change his job or specialty, which means that when applying for a job, the owner will no longer be able to cheat him. What do you think this is? And this is the following.

      This is a replacement for not effective state control of wages. This is the control of the crisis of capitalism.
      This alignment of the system without changing the principles.

      Russia may well go along the path of administrative control of salaries. This will reduce time and create an advantage over other competitors. Because Russia has a strong nationally oriented state with a smart president.
      1. gladcu2
        gladcu2 17 June 2016 22: 28
        0
        Not the most incomprehensible.

        But where is the essence of morality here?

        And morality here is not biblical, but the most technogenic based on pragmatics and the laws of nature. It consists in the fact that the worker performing the same work with his employee does not have the right to charge for it lower than his employee. Even if he doesn’t need money. Since this is not consistent with morality, a system of understanding and survival.

        Capitalism is formed on the biblical MORAL. Remember V. Katasonov who loves to tell a story about the wrath of Jesus Christ who drove usurers out of the church?

        So Christian morality is one, it prohibits usury. But there is a limited number of people who violate it. Well, maybe they are ashamed, but with their money, they spat on shame.

        Why am I. The moral of capital justifies the right to enrich units due to the total impoverishment of the majority. This moral is biblical. Already a thing of the past. Replaces another, related to the development of technology.
      2. 34 region
        34 region 17 June 2016 22: 41
        0
        Smooth2! 20.24. What does administrative salary control mean? The state will limit the income of private business; how does it limit the income of workers? Here is the minimum wage of a businessman and that’s it? Ineffective control state wage control? Is private control effective? Is Russia a nationally strong state? And what is the dominant nationality?
        1. gladcu2
          gladcu2 17 June 2016 23: 24
          0
          34 region

          gladcu2 - glad see you too. Good to see you too.

          I will explain at the expense of salary control. The crisis of capitalism lies in the situation when goods are produced but consumers do not have money to pay, since the total mass of money is in the financial sector. The financial sector is not a consumer.

          To prevent this from happening, you need to constantly monitor the return of wages to consumers. The problem is that the cap manager saves on salaries, otherwise his product will not be competitive. What does a cap manager need? He must be sure that his competitor holds the same level of remuneration. Who can guarantee the cap manager that the rules will not change? Only an independent arbiter. And who can be an independent arbitrator? The answer is the state.

          Pass all salaries through the state and you will receive capitalism with a social face.

          All with Friday.
          1. gladcu2
            gladcu2 17 June 2016 23: 36
            0
            Well, drunk Friday. Which justifies sharpness.

            It's time to kick your Kudrin. He hasn't caught mice for a long time. Trying to patch where it is long necessary to change pipes.

            LADY you can leave, less harm from it.

            Sorry.

            I just can’t get rid of the habit of apologizing, even if I'm right.
  8. CORNET
    CORNET 17 June 2016 19: 27
    -1
    You wait for everything ... well, well! The next troubles will be purposeful ... And nothing will break off this time! Moscow, corrupt mozhory .... hi
    1. Altona
      Altona 17 June 2016 19: 58
      +5
      Quote: CORNET
      The next turmoil will be focused ...

      ----------------------
      There will be no confusion, I know who needs to be cleaned up and who needs to be protected. Probably everyone knows what to do in the event of a shift in the bourgeoisie. In Donbass, the people showed how to resist an illegal decision. Our people have a huge potential for self-organization, we just don't use it. It is the bourgeoisie who scare us with "troubles and lack of blood", although they themselves are ready to go to any blood. Our oligarchic monopoly was born out of the Soviet state monopoly and it will not be difficult to eliminate it. It is simply necessary to eliminate the "management" of former speculators and black-marketeers such as Chubais and Dvorkovich. They were able to reverse the Soviet state in 1991, which means we can too. This is not the case when "the minced meat cannot be turned back and the meat cannot be restored from the cutlets."
      1. 34 region
        34 region 17 June 2016 22: 48
        0
        Altona! 19.58. There were always kind of clever comments and then suddenly there was such a jamb! I doubt that the people in the Donbass self-organized. Maybe there was some kind of center, a leader? And why didn’t the people organize around Strelkov? Why are people not self-organizing in collective farms, enterprises, housing-maintenance farms? Our oligarchism! And what did Western globalization come out of?
      2. dauria
        dauria 18 June 2016 01: 01
        +2
        It is simply necessary to eliminate the "management" from former speculators and black-market traders like Chubais and Dvorkovich.


        laughing From the heart !!!! It would seem that interferes with Mr. Putin V.V. , darling and favorite audience with huge ratings
        remove two people from the road? It seems that even if he had put them on a stake, no one would have been against ... And cheers, we are building communism again ... It’s a pity, because you had noticed excellent thoughts before ... wink
  9. yury-xnumx
    yury-xnumx 17 June 2016 19: 30
    +7
    One of the best quotes by Vladimir Ilyich Lenin
  10. Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 17 June 2016 19: 32
    +9
    Destructive forces can straddle the protest moods of the class of social transformations and lead its mass demonstrations. The country's leadership needs to take extraordinary measures of control over the situation.

    Colleagues, is it about the government, or about the 5th column? The education is purely infantry, I do not understand. belay
    I laugh of course, but let me express my subjective opinion. The policy of the DAM government is more harmful than all fifth columns at times. Of course, the opinion is subjective, but according to my living standards as a military pensioner, I understand this as follows. hi
    1. Pinkie F.
      Pinkie F. 17 June 2016 20: 51
      -2
      Quote: Vladimir 1964
      The policy of the DAM government is more harmful than all fifth columns at times.

      what do you offer? Is there a conceptual outline, plan, concrete proposals at last? Or just a whistle like a ball?
  11. CORNET
    CORNET 17 June 2016 19: 32
    -2
    And what more, no one writes ...... wassat Do not be afraid to write! bully But carefully ....
    1. Mister22408
      Mister22408 17 June 2016 22: 41
      +2
      Taki - yes, not Pharaoh's kingdom, but the people are the same, and the blank and the pyramid have canned food, and only "we are not slaves ..." I buy yachts, being in the service, here they are ... bully
      www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tyrw0yuuZoU bully
  12. PKK
    PKK 17 June 2016 19: 35
    +2
    Again, the decision rests on the same thing: It is necessary to hang especially zealous leaders in the selection of salaries, for taking bribes to the top. This creates dissatisfaction of the people. And in this case, adequate, not simple explanations are needed. When the beaten path to Kolyma appears, the question will resolve.
  13. Igor39
    Igor39 17 June 2016 19: 46
    +3
    Well, satisfy the people, isn’t Russia able to build housing and give out material support to citizens for free to those in need? In a state, this is necessary and beneficial to the people, but it is not necessary and not beneficial to the capitalists, I have everything.
    1. CORNET
      CORNET 17 June 2016 19: 53
      -7
      Quote: Igor39
      Well, satisfy the people, isn’t Russia able to build housing and give out material support to citizens for free to those in need? In a state, this is necessary and beneficial to the people, but it is not necessary and not beneficial to the capitalists, I have everything.

      And the Army and Navy ....? This is why you always forget it! And this is the main thing for Russia was and will be!
      By this we live and we will live like our ancestors and future generations ... And you do not break this chain! Here we are ...!
      1. The comment was deleted.
  14. cedar
    cedar 17 June 2016 20: 21
    -1
    Russia all the time, in all its forms, is under the blows of an adversary. All the time we are being bullied. As a result, it is dirty social foam, both above and below. It’s not for VO to paint the role and values ​​of the commander in battle.
    In World War I, the Tsar and the Tsar’s House of the Romanovs renounced and the Empire collapsed.
    During World War II, Stalin and the Politburo did not renounce and the USSR survived.
    In the "cold" WAR Gorbachev and the Politburo abdicated and the USSR suffered a crushing defeat.
    Putin and the structure are holding a blow, but if ... There is an informational and economic WAR!
    Ukraine, like an eyesore. Yanukovych greased his heels and all Ai pi wise men are fools, and Vukrayna is in the pocket of the wisest of the wisest .., where you and I, dear ones, are carefully and impudently stuffed.
    The moral of this fable. The army cannot betray. An army commander can betray. "The people will sin, the King will pray. The king will sin, the people will not pray." We see at the root.
  15. japs
    japs 17 June 2016 20: 22
    +9
    The author wrote a lot of letters. I disagree categorically. Lenin dragged why?
    Is there a revolutionary situation?
    No.
    Can the upper classes rule and mock the people?
    They can.
    People can not live by the usual standards and standards?
    Can.
    So don’t touch the Leninist theory.

    Who made the coup in the USSR?
    Tops, obvious traitors and agents of influence of the West. Those who want to live on the people.
    Who destroyed the state, for each act - the position and surname.
    You can’t do it in a day. It is necessary to head the Gosplan, to ruin the light industry to the point of absurdity. To bring to the point of absurdity the ideological component, etc.
    Remember in the country there was no soap and matches? They were not there? There were warehouses inundated with them, it was necessary to cause discontent among the people.
    And those who fattened and are now fattening are former "young reformers", Komsomol volunteers and bandits. All the foam, as always, rises to the top.
    1. 34 region
      34 region 17 June 2016 22: 56
      0
      Yaps! 20.22. Why tell the truth? Suddenly believe? In my opinion, they do not really believe it yet. Or is there hope to convey a thought?
  16. Yak28
    Yak28 17 June 2016 20: 25
    +7
    Quote: Altona
    Yes, I do not accept the current state of affairs and consider it illegal, no matter what the GDP says about the "inviolability of the results of privatization."

    Indeed, Putin made it clear that the characters who plundered the state property of the USSR in the gangster 90s will not be punished or condemned. Putin does not want to quarrel with anyone, does not want new showdowns, they say that the new businessmen who sold factories in the 90s passed State shops made their own, and so on, they can sleep peacefully. As a result, Vladimir Vladimirovich covers up and becomes an accomplice of the gangster, anti-people, bloody regime of Yeltsin, and Yeltsin, among other things, with his team of politicians, military, American advisers, destroyed the most powerful army in the world, industry, healthcare, education, and part of Russia's infrastructure. Even Hitler, with his multimillion army, did not achieve such impressive results. wink
  17. Million
    Million 17 June 2016 21: 02
    +3
    Putin would have at least put things in order in the government, otherwise the traitor is sitting on a traitor
    1. 34 region
      34 region 17 June 2016 23: 00
      +3
      Million! 21.02. The question is who should be considered traitors. Putin doesn’t seem to give up his? Yeltsin is a traitor or his own? Whose Chubais? Whose Kudrin? ...?
  18. Basil50
    Basil50 17 June 2016 21: 26
    +1
    If the state, represented by the government, does not realize the need for a legal assessment of everything that happened under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, then the threat of the collapse of RUSSIA into * pieces * will not disappear. In case of any shock, you will have to shoot all the opponents of a single state to prevent a civil war.
    The threat of direct occupation and destruction of most of the population of RUSSIA has not disappeared. Colonial plans are voiced and nobody is going to refuse.
    1. eleronn
      eleronn 17 June 2016 21: 44
      +1
      Stop talking nonsense! The increase in tariffs for the population is promoted not by the American president, but (guess who) ...
      1. iouris
        iouris 18 June 2016 12: 31
        -1
        Tariff increase - promoted by supranational structures that are engaged in the globalization of Russia. This is the reverse side of iPhones and used Volkswagen.
    2. 34 region
      34 region 17 June 2016 23: 06
      0
      Vasily50! 21.26. What does the collapse of Russia to pieces mean? Is selling state-owned enterprises a break-up or selling to pieces? Is the big difference in income a civil war or the unity of the country? Are Western companies selling and renting colonial plans or Russia's interests?
  19. Corsair5912
    Corsair5912 17 June 2016 21: 47
    0
    I am amused by the author about the most powerful social networks uniting youth.
    Young people do not care about social problems; they go out to play and watch porn.
    There is no intellectual proletariat, there are hired "Protestants" and the usual hooliganism.
    It was in Ukraine the power to overthrow the government, the descendants of undeveloped nationalists trained by foreign spies. But they would never have been able to make a coup if they had been a strong leader at the head of the country, not shy about using machine guns, flamethrowers and water cannons against cattle.
  20. Aleksandr1959
    Aleksandr1959 17 June 2016 21: 54
    -1
    And there are always groups in society that claim to seize power and change the political system. They are not necessarily connected with foreign special services and act as their agents of influence, but using the situation, they can straddle (ideologically, organizationally, intellectually) the protest moods of the class of social transformations and lead its speeches. At the same time, the enemy special services, in turn, will seek to manipulate such groups until they achieve (according to circumstances) full control over them. In turn, the claimants to power use all possible resources, including support from outside, and in the future they often get rid of foreign guardianship. This succeeds, as a rule, for those groups that rely on a clear ideology recognized by the class of social transformations.

    9 -80s. Moreover, this audience is played into the dark, playing on their unreasonable ambitions.
    It is one thing when the Nobel laureate Zhores Alferov speaks and writes about the problems of the state ... it is another thing when a certain Vasya Pupkin, Ph.D., knows what sciences, who has not done anything useful in his life for the country and its people, but with ambitions ... . begins to get into politics. Here he is sick and awaited with open arms ... as "meat" to create a mess.

    A very interesting interview came out Poltoranin about the collapse of the USSR. I will not comment on it, anyone interested, read it. But, a very unexpected version is voiced there about the characters and performers.
    http://www.km.ru/science-tech/2016/06/14/mikhail-gorbachev/778408-mikhail-poltor
    anin-12-iyunya-dlya-rossii-ne-prosto-
    Here is the link.
  21. Zlyden.Zlo
    Zlyden.Zlo 18 June 2016 01: 19
    -2
    What is the fifth column. What kind of hybrid enemies? More enemies than our government I do not know
  22. The comment was deleted.
  23. CORNET
    CORNET 18 June 2016 08: 10
    0
    The conversation is not over yet ....))))
  24. syuromyatnov
    syuromyatnov 18 June 2016 12: 55
    0
    Well then, on all TV channels and not only a bunch of liberals constantly speaks. Or do you think that an ordinary person has nothing to answer in words and not only. But Putin sees more important his image in the West. But nothing, the elections are just around the corner ...
  25. populist
    populist 18 June 2016 20: 43
    0
    It can be stated that in the society of any more or less developed state there is a segment of the population that meets the listed requirements. This is an intellectual proletariat. Some may not like this name. Well, it is easy to change it - after all, they do not argue about terms, but agree. However, if approached from strictly scientific positions, the intellectual proletariat most closely corresponds to the essence of this social class.

    Kurginyan talked a lot about this class in the "Essence of Time" virtual club (VKSV).
    In Kurginyan, the intellectual proletariat is called cognitiveity. Only the cognitive assessment was positive, in contrast to the negative assessment by the author of the article.
    The political activities of the VKSV and Kurginyan in 2011-2012 I do not consider in this case. This is a separate topic.