Deliveries of unified planning bomb cassettes SPBE-K PBC-500U abroad may begin next year

35
General Director of JSC "NPK"Engineering technology»Sergey Rusakov told the media that from 2017 onwards Russia will start supplying the latest bomb cassette to foreign customers. We are talking about ammunition PBC-500U SPBE-K.

This is a unified planning bomb cassette that is capable of defeating without the aircraft entering the zone of direct action of the enemy’s air defense weapons and delivering highly accurate self-aiming ammunition to the target. The planning bomb cassette PBK-500U SPBE-K is designed for all-weather use at any time of the day.

As an effective ammunition, the PBC-500U SPBE-K can be used against armored vehicles, anti-aircraft missile systems with thermal or radar contrast under the influence of natural and man-made interference.

The ammunition is produced by NPO Basalt. For the first time, the PBC-500U SPBE-K bomb cassette was presented in the city of Zhukovsky during the MAKS-2015 international aerospace show.

Deliveries of unified planning bomb cassettes SPBE-K PBC-500U abroad may begin next year


Sergey Rusakov quotes RIA News:
We estimate that this type of ammunition can be exported from 2017 onwards.


The cartridge has a modular design and, depending on the purpose, can be equipped with different military elements, including high-explosive fragmentation, concrete-breaking or incendiary. Antitank "filling" is also used. Effectively used by frontline aircraft aviation.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    14 June 2016 15: 02
    Well, as they say, business and nothing personal. Such ammunition for the price of a small carrier, a very profitable product. Judging by the news, the amount of ammunition for our VKS has accumulated enough?
    1. 0
      14 June 2016 15: 06
      Quote: Observer2014
      Well, as they say, business and nothing personal. Such ammunition for the price of a small non-carrier, a very profitable product.

      The product is profitable, but as far as I know, Russia itself has very few such bombs, and here it is already exporting. fellow .
      1. +2
        14 June 2016 15: 17
        Quote: razmik72
        The product is profitable, but as far as I know, Russia itself has very few such bombs, and here it is already exporting.

        The product may be profitable. but it’s not very clear what to do with the fact that cluster bombs are prohibited for use by an international convention? It remains to assume two options:
        1. To foreign buyers this convention on a drum.
        2. Buy (however, as they produce) in the case when it will not be up to the conventions.
        1. +4
          14 June 2016 15: 26
          Quote: Verdun
          The product may be profitable. but it’s not very clear what to do with the fact that cluster bombs are prohibited for use by an international convention?

          Only for those who have signed this convention. smile
          The countries that are the largest manufacturers and owners of cluster munitions - the United States, Russia, China, have not signed the convention. They also refused to accept the treaty: India, Pakistan, Israel, South Korea, who consider them an effective and necessary weapon.

          In addition, there are loopholes in the Convention itself:
          The agreement contains a list of authorized munitions equipped with submunitions, subject to their selective impact and the safety of unexploded submunitions. Among them: ammunition equipped with less than 10 submunitions, each weighing more than 4 kg, is designed to hit a single target and is equipped with electronic self-destruction and self-deactivation mechanisms. Armaments with submunitions weighing more than 20 kg are also not regulated by the convention.
          1. -1
            15 June 2016 12: 29
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Quote: Verdun
            but it’s not very clear what to do with the fact that cluster bombs are prohibited for use by an international convention?


            Only for those who have signed this convention.

            Those. for some countries, the use of such ammunition is a war crime, while for others it is possible. So?
            [media=<object%20classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000&quo
            t;% 20codebase = "http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swfl
            ash.cab#version=10.3.0"%20width="408"%20height="356"%20
            scrolling = "no"% 20id = "videoplayer"% 20align = "middle"
            >
            />
            t;
            fault.swf? share_id = 64602% 20 />
            ot; high "% 20 />
            t "% 20 />
            20/><param%20name="bgcolor"%20value="#000000"%20/>&
            lt; param% 20name = "share_id"% 20value = "64602" />
            ame = "acc_video_id"% 20value = "/" />
            p: //static.tvc.ru/flash/default.swf? share_id = 64602 "% 20quality =" high & qu
            ot;%20devicefont="true"%20bgcolor="#000000"%20width="40
            8"%20height="356"%20name="videoplayer"%20scrolling=&quo
            t; no "% 20align =" middle "% 20allowScriptAccess =" always "% 20a
            llowFullScreen = "true"% 20type = "application / x-shockwave-flash"
            % 20pluginspage = "http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"% 20 /> & l
            t; / object>]
            1. +1
              15 June 2016 14: 22
              Quote: Schulz
              Those. for some countries, the use of such ammunition is a war crime, while for others it is possible. So?

              Your attacks on us have long been known to all. It’s better to calculate how many crimes the states have committed, how many conventions they do not give a damn about, and how many do not sign. Well, at the same time, remember Hiroshima and Nagasaki. For example, have you heard to come up with a convention against cruise missiles? And never hear, because in the states this is one of the main types of weapons.
              1. 0
                15 June 2016 16: 51
                Quote: Manul
                Quote: Schulz
                Those. for some countries, the use of such ammunition is a war crime, while for others it is possible. So?

                Your attacks on us have long been known to all.


                And in my "attacks" at least sometimes logic and common sense slip?
                I'm just wondering how you can produce, sell and use cluster bombs yourself and condemn others for their use?

                On Thursday, a representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Alexander Lukashevich, called the use of cluster munitions in Ukraine a war crime. According to him, the facts cited in the report of the human rights organization Humans Rights Watch prove the responsibility of the Ukrainian authorities for the deaths of civilians and an employee of the Red Cross committee during the shelling of Donetsk. The official said that at the upcoming UN Security Council on Friday, Moscow would call on the international community to get Kiev to abandon the use of cluster munitions.
              2. The comment was deleted.
        2. +1
          14 June 2016 15: 28
          Quote: razmik72
          The product is profitable, but as far as I know, Russia itself has very few such bombs, and here it is already exporting.
          The product may be profitable. but it’s not very clear what to do with the fact that cluster bombs are prohibited for use by an international convention? It remains to assume two options:
          1. To foreign buyers this convention on a drum.
          2. Buy (however, as they produce) in the case when it will not be up to the conventions.


          If I am not mistaken, neither we nor the states have signed or ratified this convention.
        3. 0
          14 June 2016 15: 58
          http://medrikon.ru/stioboe21moeleo95/Бомбовая_кассета
          1. +1
            14 June 2016 16: 26
            Quote: razmik72

            The product may be profitable. but it’s not very clear what to do with the fact that cluster bombs are prohibited for use by an international convention?


            And where are cluster munitions?

            A bomb cassette is not a cluster bomb

            1. 0
              15 June 2016 16: 55
              Quote: bulvas

              A bomb cassette is not a cluster bomb


              And chemical weapons are not chemical weapons, right?
            2. The comment was deleted.
        4. 0
          15 June 2016 07: 12
          I suppose: Terrorists are not parties to and signatories to the convention, therefore, for terrorist organizations recognized by the public as such, this device can be used by its purchasers.
        5. The comment was deleted.
      2. 0
        14 June 2016 17: 33
        Quote: razmik72
        but as far as I know, Russia itself has very few such bombs,

        There is nothing valuable in the bomb itself, a piece of iron with stabilizers, its price is a penny. There is the main content, self-aiming combat elements. Those that were thrown into Syria were ancient 91years, a third did not work.
      3. 0
        15 June 2016 12: 08
        You can only sell what is in demand.
    2. +2
      14 June 2016 21: 57
      Quote: Observer2014
      Well, as they say, business and nothing personal. Such ammunition for the price of a small non-carrier, a very profitable product.
      the main thing is that this profitable product does not fall on our heads Yes otherwise we’ll get completely bad on our heads Yes
  2. +4
    14 June 2016 15: 04
    And recently in the comments they shouted that we do not have planning bombs. And here already even for export. Or am I misunderstanding something?
    1. 0
      14 June 2016 15: 11
      I wonder how far she can plan? Here the number is not called. The plumage is visible in the photo, but how far can it plan on this?
      1. -1
        14 June 2016 15: 37
        Quote: Fregate
        I wonder how far she can plan? Here the number is not called. The plumage is visible in the photo, but how far can it plan on this?

        Do you see the plumage of the X-101 folded? On the drum.
      2. 0
        14 June 2016 21: 09
        10000m and 800km \ h about 40 km
    2. +1
      14 June 2016 16: 02
      It is clear who screamed - Belolentochnye and the Israelis.
    3. +1
      14 June 2016 17: 05
      Quote: Muvka
      And recently in the comments they shouted that we do not have planning bombs. And here already even for export. Or am I misunderstanding something?

      Yes, wrong. PBC-500U is actually a container with submunitions, an analogue of the American CBU-105 (aka Rokai-2), only it is not planning. The difference between PBC-500U and RBC-500 is only in the possibility of planning, but at the same time, planning is uncontrollable, i.e. there is no homing system, dropped and then flies by the will of the wind and gravity, disclosure by timer. This is all the last century.
      We are lagging behind in "smart" bombs, those that dropped 30 km away. from the target, and she flew herself and got where it was needed.
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. -1
    14 June 2016 15: 05
    Eeeee ... and have they already filled all the warehouses? Nowhere to go? I am not against trade, but first we need to get enough of it ourselves.
    1. +4
      14 June 2016 15: 06
      Quote: fzr1000
      Eeeee ... and have they already filled all the warehouses? Nowhere to go? I am not against trade, but first we need to get enough of it ourselves.

      Are you sure that we don’t have them? It seems that all the weapons we now have first, then for export. Or do you need tours to the warehouses?
      1. +2
        14 June 2016 15: 50
        I dont know. But I hope we have plenty of them. Although, knowing our "effective" managers ...
    2. 0
      14 June 2016 17: 19
      Quote: fzr1000
      Eeeee ... and have they already filled all the warehouses?


      Those used in Syria were marked in 1991.
      1. 0
        14 June 2016 20: 41
        Why then for the first time shown at MAX 2015? So secret that they didn’t show them for 24 years?
  5. +5
    14 June 2016 15: 05
    if I'm not mistaken, such ammunition was used by our aviation in Syria
    1. 0
      14 June 2016 17: 08
      Quote: kote119
      if I'm not mistaken, such ammunition was used by our aviation in Syria

      Yes, the truth is incomprehensible against whom. In the video that is available and subsequent photos they were thrown into a clean field.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  6. UVB
    +6
    14 June 2016 15: 07
    Related Videos:
  7. 0
    14 June 2016 15: 10
    It will be interesting to see who the buyers are. It’s noteworthy that only the states that are members of the SCO, the USA and China did not sign the international agreement on the ban on cluster munitions. It will be clear.
    1. +1
      14 June 2016 15: 24
      This is not a "cluster munition", it is, on the contrary, a delivery vehicle for precision weapons!
      The wings of the bourgeois "gliding bombs" are really long ... Although they are foldable, maybe ours are folded too - in the photo, because of the packaging it is not visible ... what
  8. 0
    14 June 2016 15: 18
    Well, that's right, we in Syria not only advertised the Su-35 and S-400, but all kinds of gifts that fly directly into the hands of the "customers" laughing
  9. 0
    14 June 2016 15: 19
    Fine. A export supply price for your army weaning.
    And something tells me that such things only work with our aiming systems.
    which are on airplanes.
    1. +1
      14 June 2016 17: 12
      Quote: Zomanus
      And something tells me that such things only work with our aiming systems.
      which are on airplanes.

      The fact that something tells you is misleading you. Drive such a clue in three necks, type in the search engine Self-Aiming Combat Element and read what is written about it there. Or at least think about the meaning of the word "self-aiming".
  10. +3
    14 June 2016 15: 29
    They will trade as usual: they sold one, received money, made for themselves + another one for sale. I think this is a very forced measure to saturate our videoconferencing warehouses. At some point, when our pilots in Syria were already very intensively explaining to the Basmachs that since they wanted to live badly, the same Basalt suddenly switched to three-shift work. That is, the existing accumulation of bombs was close to depletion, only NZ remained. The native state, as usual, "has no money, but you stick here," so the "Basaltites" are spinning as best they can, so that they themselves stay afloat and help the Aerospace Forces.
    By the way, the "basalts" at one time already offered assistance to the state in the fight against fires of the so-called. airborne fire extinguishing agent ASP-500.
    1. +1
      14 June 2016 15: 39
      Quote: Corsair0304
      They will trade as usual: they sold one, received money, made for themselves + another one for sale. I think this is a very forced measure to saturate our videoconferencing warehouses. At some point, when our pilots in Syria were already very intensively explaining to the Basmachs that since they wanted to live badly, the same Basalt suddenly switched to three-shift work. That is, the existing accumulation of bombs was close to depletion, only NZ remained. The native state, as usual, "has no money, but you stick here," so the "Basaltites" are spinning as best they can, so that they themselves stay afloat and help the Aerospace Forces.
      By the way, the "basalts" at one time already offered assistance to the state in the fight against fires of the so-called. airborne fire extinguishing agent ASP-500.

      Just bombs should be a certain amount. And since we began to actively spend them (old stocks), it seems quite logical that in their place fresh ones were needed.
      1. 0
        14 June 2016 15: 47
        Quote: Muvka
        Just bombs should be a certain amount. And since we began to actively spend them (old stocks), it seems quite logical that in their place fresh ones were needed.


        I mean the same. Nature does not tolerate emptiness. Used up the bomb? Do the same. And what to do when there is no money? Put something on sale for money to appear.
        1. +1
          14 June 2016 16: 10
          Quote: Corsair0304
          Quote: Muvka
          Just bombs should be a certain amount. And since we began to actively spend them (old stocks), it seems quite logical that in their place fresh ones were needed.


          I mean the same. Nature does not tolerate emptiness. Used up the bomb? Do the same. And what to do when there is no money? Put something on sale for money to appear.

          What makes you think that there is no money in the military-industrial complex? Everything is relatively normal there.
  11. 0
    14 June 2016 15: 50
    The thing is necessary, if you started to trade, then you have already saved up for yourself!
  12. -1
    14 June 2016 16: 18
    The ambiguous feeling from the article is good at what we do, and it’s bad that selling over the hill is in priority ...
  13. 0
    14 June 2016 18: 31
    If such a decision is made, then it means not only commercial interest, 100%. So against someone it is necessary!
  14. +1
    14 June 2016 19: 17
    Quote: Verdun
    Quote: razmik72
    The product is profitable, but as far as I know, Russia itself has very few such bombs, and here it is already exporting.

    The product may be profitable. but it’s not very clear what to do with the fact that cluster bombs are prohibited for use by an international convention? It remains to assume two options:
    1. To foreign buyers this convention on a drum.
    2. Buy (however, as they produce) in the case when it will not be up to the conventions.

    We are not talking about those "cluster" bombs. Here, a cassette is understood as a rather specific submunition. Basically, the most interesting are anti-tank with individual guidance - which were used in Syria.
  15. 0
    14 June 2016 21: 46
    Who is selling interesting?