Military Review

Analytical program "However"

21



The head of the German Ministry of Economics spoke in favor of returning Russia to the G-8 - our country is an important global player, said Sigmar Gabriel in an interview quoted by the RIA news agency today.News". But there are colleagues Gabriel with other views on the problem.

However, hello! Russia for Germany is no longer a partner, but a rival and a threat. Or is it still not a threat !? On the amendments to the so-called "White Paper" - a guide to national security policy, which is annually compiled by the German Defense Ministry, according to which Russia is transferred from "partners to rivals," Die Welt reported. In the new edition of the German White Book, Russia is included in the list of ten major threats, along with infections, migrants, terrorists, hackers and the greenhouse effect. In response to a stormy reaction, confused diplomatic denials followed in Russia, and the German ambassador suggested not paying attention to propaganda.

Note that the “propaganda” in this case came from the influential Die Welt, and the current German generals are the most politically dependent category of workers in the world. And they certainly didn’t come up with it themselves. And no diplomacy can not hide that our relations with Germany for ten years of the chancellorship of Frau Merkel turned around almost 180 degrees.

"Never before stories relations between Germany and Russia were not as close and developed as they are now ... Germany has consistently supported the formation of a comprehensive partnership. On the way to achieving this goal, we have made significant steps forward ... It is impressive how much our interests coincide in many areas, ”wrote German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder in September 2004 of the year. Recall that this is the time when Russia offered Germany and with it the whole of Europe not just a partnership, but global economic and technological convergence. Starting from the energy sector, Russia was ready to turn our Gazprom into a pan-European company, thus ensuring Europe with absolute energy security and an absolute competitive advantage. On the basis of a single energy technology cooperation was assumed. For example, Russia offered to enter the European aerospace concern EDC as an equal partner, along with Germany and France. And, by the way, received the consent of the then Chancellor Schroeder.

However, elections followed, in which, by the way, the foreign policy topic was not discussed at all, and Angela Merkel became the Chancellor, permanently redeeming her original sin in front of her American partner - victory in the Russian school olympiad. In fact, in response to the “hand and heart” proposal, we saw a squeamish grimace and the “Third Energy Package”.

“The United States joined the First World War, primarily because of the events in Russia. Because of concerns about the prospects for the emergence of a single hegemon of Europe. We took part in the Second World War on the same issue - Germany. Germany and Russia. We fought in the Cold War, in fact, about Germany and what it will be. For the United States, it was always the primordial, chief fear that German capital and German technology would combine with Russian natural resources and labor in a single combination that has been scaring the US for over a century. What will come of it? The United States has already laid out the cards on the table, ”said George Friedman, a political scientist, founder and director of the private intelligence and analysis organization Stretfor.

The only difference is that today the Germans play with other people's cards. Not for that, the United States 70 has been occupying Germany for years, cultivating and training its political and media elite so that the Anglo-Saxons' geopolitical nightmare, the Russian-German alliance, comes true before their eyes. The German elite twice made a historical mistake - one that is worse than a crime - a conflict with Russia in the interests of their geopolitical rivals. For the third time, she does it sluggishly and under the lash. And really wants to jump off. And it will be reckoned to her. At the trial of history.
Author:
Originator:
http://www.1tv.ru/news/2016/06/09/303859-analiticheskaya_programma_odnako
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 10 June 2016 06: 10
    +4
    Politics is one paid. The people are different, they are waiting for help, gas and tanks.
  2. avvg
    avvg 10 June 2016 06: 19
    +2
    In my opinion, Merkel is not eternal, and with the departure of Merkel everything will change.
    1. atalef
      atalef 10 June 2016 06: 44
      +1
      Quote: avvg
      In my opinion, Merkel is not eternal, and with the departure of Merkel everything will change.

      Everything will change - you just have to wait.
      True, it is not known how long to wait and which direction to change. wink
      The only question (more precisely, one of many) is if you do not change (not literally you, but in general) - why should someone else change?
      1. Karasik
        Karasik 10 June 2016 07: 11
        +3
        I hope that everything will change if Sarah Wagenknecht comes to power. By the way, not so long ago, some scumbag threw a cake in her face (video attached). How Ukrainian channels were sophisticated about this! They commented "... the German patron of Putin was thrown into the" pyk "with a cake ..." I specially wrote the Ukrainian word "pyka", which can be translated as "the face of an animal" (the VO site does not skip literal translation). A cake was thrown into her for the truth about refugees. What does "Putin's intercessor" have to do with refugees - ukroSMI does not go into such nuances.
        1. m077ea
          m077ea 10 June 2016 07: 28
          0
          what does Putin's intercessor have to do with it? - despite the fact that the first few exclamations on Ukrainian sites were published by these, like theirs ... "political bots", and then it started like a snowball ...
          Do you think the Ukrainian "establishment" is being driven out of it in search of reasons? I doubt very much
        2. Blondy
          Blondy 10 June 2016 07: 49
          +1
          Of course, Sarah is popular with us, in particular on this site. But how much is its watered popular on a German scale? Nonetheless, our sympathies will not decide.
  3. Knowing
    Knowing 10 June 2016 06: 29
    +5
    In this case, the players are Russia and the United States; The EU as a whole and Germany in particular are only "pieces on the chessboard."
  4. Banishing liberoids
    Banishing liberoids 10 June 2016 06: 51
    +5
    Take to your "eight" ukroinu-licking the ass to the owners, they showed their devotion.
  5. cap
    cap 10 June 2016 07: 08
    0
    "The only difference is that today the Germans are playing with other people's cards. It is not for this that the United States has occupied Germany for 70 years, nurtured and trained its political and media elite, so that the age-old geopolitical nightmare of the Anglo-Saxons - the Russian-German alliance, will come true before their eyes."

    And the cards are marked! fellow
  6. sergeyzzz
    sergeyzzz 10 June 2016 07: 14
    +1
    As always, bull's-eye and, as always, too short for a full analysis.
  7. Yak28
    Yak28 10 June 2016 07: 18
    +4
    In the new edition of the German White Paper, Russia is included in the list of ten major threats ...
    In all pro-American countries they say that Russia is a threat and evil, so why prove the opposite to these sheep. Why not Russia become really bad, arm as much as possible and stronger, build more military bases abroad, return to Africa, to Cuba, find a bridgehead in Latin America, then openly carry out anti-American propaganda. We must organize orange revolutions, support any discontent among the masses in NATO countries, and facilitate terrorist attacks in these countries. So it’s better to become really bad than to say good, and in return getting spitting in the face wink
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 10 June 2016 07: 23
      +2
      Quote: Yak28
      build more military bases abroad, return to Africa, Cuba, find a bridgehead in Latin America

      "There is no money, but you hold on there ..." (C) :-)
      1. kos2910
        kos2910 10 June 2016 09: 17
        +2
        As for the construction of more military bases, of course it is not necessary, we will not repeat the mistakes of the USSR and the USA. But about "no money" - that's none of your business, we'll figure it out ourselves. Everyone remembers how they survived in the 90s at the expense of the garden and did not pay pensions at all ... Of course, the situation in the economy does not paint the liberals, but the power block is adequate, do not flatter yourself there, over the hill ...
    2. m077ea
      m077ea 10 June 2016 07: 32
      0
      I also think so, it is necessary to really scoop them with our boats wherever possible. and I would also ... no torpedoes. But the scouts would have hooked their aircraft wing somewhere in the tank area. initiate some peace prize at home, give it to Putin, then Lavrov, then Shoigu. Well, smile at everyone and declare everyone in love and friendliness forever
  8. bad
    bad 10 June 2016 08: 17
    +1
    And really wants to get off.
    .. to want, and to jump off are two big differences .. the mattresses are too much occupied by the Germans .. and it is too obvious that the ruling "elite" of Germany are taken by the balls laughing why there they hold Merkel, apparently in the future we will find out .. laughing
  9. ALLxANDr
    ALLxANDr 10 June 2016 08: 41
    0
    I want to correct the author, the Anglo-Saxons are not English (as I also once thought). These are the British and Germans, or rather, once their union. Therefore, the phrase - .. on their eyes the centuries-old geopolitical nightmare of the Anglo-Saxons - the Russian-German alliance .. came to be very incorrect.
  10. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 10 June 2016 09: 10
    -2
    I’m not catching up - who are they going to fight there? Gays? 40% of male nemchury wish to be housewives. Fact. Not a single Arab and Niger will fight for a geyropa for any money. High-tech bullets end overnight.
    And then the "beating of babies" and the disposal of the Geyrop herd will simply begin.
    I think that the Natans, who still have at least a drop of gray matter in their heads, cannot know this.
  11. Antiprogressor
    Antiprogressor 10 June 2016 09: 21
    +1
    Quote: Yak28
    Why not Russia become really bad, arm yourself as powerful and stronger as possible, build military bases abroad more, return to Africa, Cuba, find a bridgehead in Latin America, then openly conduct anti-American propaganda. You must arrange orange revolutions, support any discontent the masses of people in NATO countries, to help carry out terrorist attacks in these countries. so it is better to become truly bad than to say we are good, and in return to get spits in the face

    I totally agree with a little No. The USSR collapsed due to the betrayal of the elite, excessive liberalism and corruption. This can only be avoided under the strictest dictatorship of the Singaporean type. "Put your closest three friends in prison, they know why ..." This will never happen with us. For betrayal and debauchery in society is much larger than the Soviet one. And the strength is not the same. You have to spin, enter into temporary alliances, which is not a gut
    1. Dry_T-50
      Dry_T-50 10 June 2016 11: 46
      0
      Quote: Antiprogressor
      The USSR collapsed due to treason by the top, excessive liberalism and corruption.

      Oooh, again it went in the spirit of "Khrushchev betrayed the USSR"
  12. Antiprogressor
    Antiprogressor 10 June 2016 09: 40
    0
    Quote: ALLxANDr
    I want to correct the author, the Anglo-Saxons are not English (as I also once thought). These are the British and Germans, or rather, once their union. Therefore, the phrase - .. on their eyes the centuries-old geopolitical nightmare of the Anglo-Saxons - the Russian-German alliance .. came to be very incorrect.

    The alignment boils down to empires: GERMANY, RUSSIA, CHINA, UK. RELATIONSHIPS THERE ARE CENTURY. THE PEOPLES ARE DIFFERENT. FIGHT AND UNIONS. So the British in the imperial concept are still Anglo-Saxons. And the Germans are the Germans. It's not about the chromosomes.