Military Review

The Pentagon calls the interception of the American RC-135 Chinese J-10 "dangerous"

68
Information Agency Reuters with reference to sources in the United States reports that the Pentagon protested in connection with the "dangerous interception" of the American military aircraft carried out by Chinese fighters. We are talking about the interception of the reconnaissance aircraft RC-135 by the Chinese J-10 aircraft, which occurred over the waters of the East China Sea.

The Pentagon calls the interception of the American RC-135 Chinese J-10 "dangerous"


A statement by the US military says that one of the Chinese fighters "got too close to the reconnaissance aircraft that was performing the planned flight." About how close the J-10 approached the RC-135, and why the scout's flight was called planned, and its interception was not, the Pentagon is not informed.

Recently, a situation has arisen in which virtually any interception of an American reconnaissance aircraft made by aircraft of the Russian Aerospace Forces or the Chinese Air Force is called either “unsafe” or “unprofessional” in Washington. At the same time, no comments are made on how, in the opinion of the Pentagon, interception must be in order for the United States to declare the professionalism of the pilots who performed it. It is strange that in this case the Pentagon did not say that the planes could collide with the "seagull" ...

In the main foreign policy department of the People’s Republic of China and in the country's defense ministry, statements by US military officials regarding “dangerous interception” are left without comment.
Photos used:
www.ausairpower.net
68 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. svp67
    svp67 8 June 2016 07: 16
    +30
    The Pentagon calls the interception of the American RC-135 Chinese J-10 "dangerous"
    Well, if it is so "dangerous" there, then why are you climbing to other people's borders ...
    1. Yuri from Volgograd
      Yuri from Volgograd 8 June 2016 07: 19
      +11
      Quote: svp67
      The Pentagon calls the interception of the American RC-135 Chinese J-10 "dangerous"
      Well, if it is so "dangerous" there, then why are you climbing to other people's borders ...

      I don’t understand either, if they love security so much, what doesn’t stay at home?
      1. Shadowcat
        Shadowcat 8 June 2016 07: 27
        +3
        Weaned for 20 years. We teach them, we teach them - but they all will not get used to it.
        1. cniza
          cniza 8 June 2016 08: 01
          +5
          Quote: ShadowCat
          Weaned for 20 years. We teach them, we teach them - but they all will not get used to it.


          It’s hard to break pride, we’ll help anything, mess around and that's enough.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Blondy
        Blondy 8 June 2016 09: 36
        +3
        So it’s like someone: the Pentagon is dangerous, but not the Chinese.
      3. Ze Kot
        Ze Kot 8 June 2016 22: 08
        0
        Quote: Yuri from Volgograd
        Quote: svp67
        The Pentagon calls the interception of the American RC-135 Chinese J-10 "dangerous"
        Well, if it is so "dangerous" there, then why are you climbing to other people's borders ...

        I don’t understand either, if they love security so much, what doesn’t stay at home?



        Masochists
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 8 June 2016 07: 31
      +2
      Let the Chinese rename their fighter jet fighter-reconnaissance. Then they will become "partners" with American reconnaissance aircraft. laughing
      And, in fact, the Chinese are adopting the tactics of the Russian military aviation in relation to the "curious", which cannot but please us.
    3. Andrey K
      Andrey K 8 June 2016 07: 46
      +7
      Quote: svp67
      Pentagon protests over “dangerous interception”

      Some Pentagon fearful and "buried" became laughing
      Everyone offends him, he fears everyone, complains everywhere laughing
      1. igor.borov775
        igor.borov775 8 June 2016 12: 35
        0
        Quote: Andrey K
        Quote: svp67
        Pentagon protests over “dangerous interception”

        Some Pentagon fearful and "buried" became laughing
        Everyone offends him, he fears everyone, complains everywhere laughing

        Hi !! It's time to stop being surprised. The complaint is addressed to the US Senate. For a simple American, they simply inform the supposedly oppressed. Where the situation is, there is National Security where everything is clear. I have already made the United States apologize a second time for sure it will not happen. They immediately rushed off from this area as lepers. Do not think badly about the Air Force The United States is pragmatic there. There will be no second humiliation. The destruction of the US President is an indecent topic. We have not yet inflicted such an insult to the United States. But we managed to turn into an adversary. The wide nature of the United States always finds enemies and, most importantly, without appeal.
    4. vic58
      vic58 8 June 2016 08: 08
      0
      "Pampers" advertise! Either the Russians "ate Cook", now the Chinese?!? It looks like "girls in skirts", not military! request
      1. kit_bellew
        kit_bellew 8 June 2016 08: 29
        0
        At the same time, no comments are given as to what, in the Pentagon's opinion, the interception should be in order for the USA to declare the professionalism of the pilots performing it.

        Well, it's as clear as daylight: the Chinese would have had enough to say to the Amer on the radio "go away, you pra-active!" - and he would have left immediately. And that would be professional in relation to the USAF wassat And most importantly - tolerance and again tolerance.
    5. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 8 June 2016 08: 13
      +3
      They provoke themselves .... as I understand it - there is nothing to complain about a dog that had been teasing for a long time before and it bit you ....
    6. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 8 June 2016 08: 36
      0
      Any interception of an American reconnaissance aircraft by aircraft of the Russian Air Force or the Chinese Air Force in Washington is called either "unsafe" or "unprofessional."

      You might think that they are intercepted off the coast of the American mainland!
      At the same time, no comments are given as to what, in the Pentagon's opinion, the interception should be in order for the USA to declare the professionalism of the pilots performing it.

      Probably one in which the American plane stops communicating and disappears from the radar screens when approaching the borders of foreign countries!
    7. Karasik
      Karasik 8 June 2016 08: 43
      +3
      Quote: svp67
      Well, if it is so "dangerous" there, then why are you climbing to other people's borders ...

      Any interception can be considered dangerous. For this, interception is carried out - so that they feel the danger and do not climb where they should not. A non-dangerous interception can only be in a computer game, and even there you can break a finger on the keyboard from excessive zeal.
  2. Winnie76
    Winnie76 8 June 2016 07: 19
    +7
    Provocateurs. As I understand it, the RC 135 flew with the transponder turned off ... Ever play
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 8 June 2016 07: 31
      +9
      Quote: Winnie76
      Provocateurs.

      These are Chinese women and Russian provocateurs; they do not give a peaceful American intelligence agent a fly.
      The Chinese also arranged a provocation by installing an air defense system.
      1. Tusv
        Tusv 8 June 2016 07: 58
        +5
        Quote: Alexander Romanov
        These are Chinese women and Russian provocateurs; they do not give a peaceful American intelligence agent a fly.

        Believe me! Not interception for the sake of hospitality for laughing
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 8 June 2016 08: 29
          0
          Quote: Tusv
          Not interception for the sake of hospitality for

          Instead of salt? lol
          1. Tusv
            Tusv 8 June 2016 08: 50
            +1
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Instead of salt?

            We are civilized people. First you need to meet the guest, then put him at the table, and the fraction is for the thankless disgusting refusal to sit on our airfield negative
    2. Corsair
      Corsair 8 June 2016 09: 13
      0
      Quote: Winnie76
      Provocateurs. As I understand it, the RC 135 flew with the transponder turned off ... Ever play

      To shoot them down with some secret weapon over the sea, the ocean, so as not to even guess what it was - only then they will stop showing off, and so everything is within their normal range. And ours are so intercepted from time to time - only screams: ay plaque almost got in! it’s impossible, it’s dangerous! - I have never heard from ours. Unless it was civil recently, this is understandable.
  3. sergeyzzz
    sergeyzzz 8 June 2016 07: 23
    +10
    But what do Americans want interestingly? So that a beautiful woman in a kokoshnik meets bread and salt? They didn’t receive a rocket in the side and let them be happy with that. am
    1. svp67
      svp67 8 June 2016 07: 26
      +1
      Quote: sergeyzzz
      But what do Americans want interestingly? So that a beautiful woman in a kokoshnik meets bread and salt?

      In this case, in a kimono and a cup of rice ...
      Quote: sergeyzzz
      They didn’t receive a rocket in the side and let them be happy with that.

      That is probably why they are unhappy ... although who will understand them "gays".
  4. iliitchitch
    iliitchitch 8 June 2016 07: 23
    +5
    You still sew them sexual harassment.
  5. KOH
    KOH 8 June 2016 07: 25
    +1
    ... what, in the opinion of the Pentagon, should there be an interception so that in the USA they declare the professionalism of the pilots performing it ...

    You need to apparently land ... laughing ))))
    1. family tree
      family tree 8 June 2016 07: 40
      +4
      Quote: CON
      It seems necessary to land ...))))

      Ground tightly, 2,5m deep into the globe what
  6. meriem1
    meriem1 8 June 2016 07: 28
    +3
    We are not ashamed of us and the Chinese. How wicked We are. We offend the "great" country. Well, let him try to put Us in a corner. laughing
    PS. Isn't it time to turn on electronic warfare on the interceptor and burn out all their vaunted electronics on the scout amers ??? And then they got the "untouchables" with their blunt whining
  7. Shadowcat
    Shadowcat 8 June 2016 07: 37
    +2
    "Our pilot Li Xi Qing shot you down ...." * whistles a song *
  8. Red_Hamer
    Red_Hamer 8 June 2016 07: 38
    +5
    Recently, a situation has arisen in which virtually any interception of an American reconnaissance aircraft by aircraft of the Russian Air Force or Chinese Air Force in Washington is called either "unsafe" or "unprofessional."
    Even the Chinese, Carl! Even the Chinese!
  9. rus-5819
    rus-5819 8 June 2016 07: 39
    +5
    In the main foreign policy department of the People’s Republic of China and in the country's defense ministry, statements by US military officials regarding “dangerous interception” are left without comment.

    Chinese wisdom - do not stoop to polemics with a skunk.
    We, too, need to learn not to make excuses to our "partners", but calmly, without hype, defend our interests always and everywhere.
    Shtatnikov, like hooligans in the gateway, respect only strength, words for them - a manifestation of weakness.
  10. Crucian
    Crucian 8 June 2016 07: 41
    +1
    what, according to the Pentagon, should there be an interception so that in the USA they declare the professionalism of the pilots who performed it

    Apparently the "interception" should be carried out by firing several missiles at the plane of mattress mats ...
  11. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 8 June 2016 07: 43
    +1
    It’s dangerous, it’s unprofessional here. The teacher at school, damn it, call your parents to school! And we have a daddy judoka !!!
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. Stinger
    Stinger 8 June 2016 07: 46
    +2
    in the country's Ministry of Defense, statements by US military officials regarding the “dangerous interception” are left without comment.

    And they’re doing it right. The dog barks, the wind wears.
  14. rus-5819
    rus-5819 8 June 2016 07: 48
    +1
    In the main foreign policy department of the People’s Republic of China and in the country's defense ministry, statements by US military officials regarding “dangerous interception” are left without comment.

    Chinese wisdom - do not stoop to polemics with a skunk.
    We, too, have to learn not to make excuses in front of the "partners". Protect your interests anytime, anywhere.
  15. Yak-15
    Yak-15 8 June 2016 07: 50
    +2
    These mattress whiners, how are they going to fight? And they are brave masters to fight only in Hollywood and with the Papuans who have only a bow and arrow, and even then, only from a bird's eye view. Well, who has, at least something better than crossbows. then the whining begins. The Fuhrer once said about them that the Yankees are not soldiers, but shit. And the operation in the Ardennes in MARCH 1945 !!!!!!! clearly confirmed his words. Vietnam also confirmed that they are shit. Well, the warriors from Donald Cook at all. 27 shitty warriors, after a simple flight of our "Drying".
  16. aszzz888
    aszzz888 8 June 2016 07: 56
    +3
    The "touchy" merikatos are afraid of their shadow. Let them walk on OWN land, and no one will frighten them.
    1. Alexanast
      Alexanast 8 June 2016 08: 36
      +9
      So they don't have their own land. This is the so-called "nation" - without a father, without a mother, no shame, no conscience.
  17. From Tver
    From Tver 8 June 2016 07: 59
    +2
    How so well, wherever there is no free flight for unfortunate Americans, ah-ah-ah-ah. laughing
  18. tilix
    tilix 8 June 2016 08: 03
    +3
    Something wrong. When they need, the Americans know how to keep quiet perfectly.
    It is obvious that the dictating and the formation of the idea that if they slam the board in some "misunderstanding", it does not matter which one, the reason is already clear, and then according to the circumstances.
  19. Taygerus
    Taygerus 8 June 2016 08: 05
    +3
    someday on their neck they will rake for peaceful flights of peaceful intelligence
  20. igorka357
    igorka357 8 June 2016 08: 07
    -1
    Listen dear ones, I am also a patriot of my Motherland, and a real patriot, and not "we will give all the pests" ..! Do not underestimate the amers, they are a cunning and cunning adversary, plus they are a very strong adversary in military terms! Do not forget the Americans bent half of the world, and not it is important by what methods! The previous post is about the fact that the Americans are warriors, no nonsense at all, the then real Yankees, they bent the Japs on the islands, don't worry, and they mixed their intestines with blood and sand on the beaches, and took the islands! The Fuhrer also spoke about Russia "Collos on feet of clay ", and you see the Yak-15 how it came out, so your references to Hitler are useless! And if the respected Yak-15 compares the current generation of amers, and our generation, then our youth does not look too serious in terms of patriotism and heroism for the good of the Motherland! Well, about their destroyer and our su-24, I will not say anything at all, some dibil made a stuffing about the sailors who were leaving in batches, and to my regret, a huge number of such dibiles believed it, and still - it's time to talk it over!
    1. B.T.V.
      B.T.V. 8 June 2016 08: 18
      +4
      Quote: igorka357
      ! Do not forget the Americans have bent half the world, and no matter what methods!


      It is even very important "by what methods they bend." I do not presume to judge what kind of "warriors" they are, but the fact that having believed in their "exceptionalism", they lose the instinct of self-preservation is a fact. Such behavior will not lead to good.
    2. Yak-15
      Yak-15 8 June 2016 08: 31
      +2
      Where did they manifest themselves, like warriors in modern history? According to the same mattress command, suitable for war personnel, only 2 !!!%. Maybe there wasn’t their victorious escape from our ships in the Black Sea, when our ship rammed their ship squeezing it out of our tervod in 1981? And they also shamefully fled. Or was it also a stuffing, and all sorts of de-bills believe in this scam?
      1. igorka357
        igorka357 8 June 2016 11: 23
        0
        No, this is not a divorce, newsreel evidence! And the fact that Cooks fired in packs because their Russian bomber scared .. just please answer seriously, do you believe that?
        1. Yak-15
          Yak-15 8 June 2016 11: 40
          +1
          Yankees are used to fighting strawberry ice cream and toilet paper. That says a lot about it. And the fact that our SU scared them is not strange. He "beheaded" the ship and the brainwashed Yankees with a pathological opinion of their superiority immediately thought that they needed to save their asses. So they began to save, because in Hollywood they show Russians angry and crazy. It's not weddings and bombing hospitals with schools.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  21. Dax
    Dax 8 June 2016 08: 14
    +2
    On the street, a drug addict, and even a sex change (now a drug addict - it is), hitting a healthy man and burst into tears: "Oh my hand now hurts, you are not tolerant and evil."
  22. Alex von Dorn
    Alex von Dorn 8 June 2016 08: 15
    +5
    Americans need to be taken seriously, as well as the Chinese. It would be nice to push them for real, to shoot plenty. Without nuclear weapons, of course, but they shot. And we would have looked at all this and appreciated.
    1. 0255
      0255 8 June 2016 09: 47
      -2
      Quote: Alex von Dorn
      Americans need to be taken seriously, as well as the Chinese. It would be nice to push them for real, to shoot plenty. Without nuclear weapons, of course, but they shot. And we would have looked at all this and appreciated.

      Cruel, but right, China is no ally for Russia
  23. silberwolf88
    silberwolf88 8 June 2016 08: 19
    +1
    In fact, dangerous and provocative are the flights themselves along the borders of sovereign states in peacetime ... the rest is all the consequences of such a policy and tactics of the US and its hangers-on ...
  24. ibu355yandex.ru
    ibu355yandex.ru 8 June 2016 08: 30
    +1
    "The People's Republic of China's Foreign Ministry and the country's Defense Ministry have left the statements of US military officials regarding the 'dangerous interception' without comment."
    Well done Chinese! Professionally completed their work, and excuses are not the destiny of the right and strong! They don’t care what the Americans are babbling ...
    1. 8654
      8654 8 June 2016 08: 39
      0
      What is there to comment? The Americans say so, only to cut the money on the military budget. request
      Fear is being pumped at home and nothing more.
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. Atlant-1164
    Atlant-1164 8 June 2016 08: 38
    +2
    I’m sure that the Chinese fighter without turning on the turn signal began to be rebuilt .. ahead of the RC-135. I should deprive the Chinese of the rights .. for dangerous driving.)
  27. valent45
    valent45 8 June 2016 08: 40
    +1
    Like the interception of an Amer plane, everything is unprofessional. They consider themselves only professionals.
    Well, let's look further.
  28. Yun Klob
    Yun Klob 8 June 2016 08: 47
    0
    Is it time to test the strength of air conditioners on American aircraft?
  29. ramzes1776
    ramzes1776 8 June 2016 08: 48
    +2
    Let them say thanks that the Chinese did not put them at the airport, as has already happened.
  30. Wildfox
    Wildfox 8 June 2016 08: 49
    0
    Does anyone have friends flying scouts? It was just a rumor that during aircraft reconnaissance, the plane should go clearly along the course for reliable target coordinates and evasion maneuvers, this is almost a breakdown of intelligence.
    If true, then it is clear why they vote there is a departure, but there is no reliable data. If anyone will have infa about this, please share with those who did not fly on scouts))
  31. newterra
    newterra 8 June 2016 09: 01
    +1
    With these words, they need to divert the public from the questions "What xs did the American reconnaissance plane do there?"
  32. VICTOR-61
    VICTOR-61 8 June 2016 09: 31
    +1
    They themselves climb on the rampage and then they are indignant fly at home and no one will intercept, they didn’t run into those and soon China will fly near the USA that’s what then they will be interesting to say
  33. Alekseyklg
    Alekseyklg 8 June 2016 09: 47
    +1
    What kind of fighters they are, they did not face a serious enemy. What kind of commander is such a warrior, and the head of the Pentagon you yourself know - "man" is still the same!
  34. Barakuda
    Barakuda 8 June 2016 09: 55
    0
    And I have famous flyers. (Boring) and there are 4 of them. , (aiming guns) And GSh shit did not. They are laughing.

    Uzin. Bicycle village.
    So any tear to pieces, F-some. escort before compartments open.
  35. masiya
    masiya 8 June 2016 09: 59
    +1
    There is no need to climb and there will be no dangers, the Chinese, too, well done do not let the Yankees frolic according to their rules near their borders.
  36. black
    black 8 June 2016 10: 18
    0
    If our pilots, as in the Soviet Union, for each "unsafe" interception, they start adding stars to the shoulder strap ... And I'm even afraid to imagine what will happen. Return of an American scout with a crowbar stuck in the fuselage?
  37. Barakuda
    Barakuda 8 June 2016 10: 19
    0
    And I have famous flyers. (Boring) thumped, (aiming guns) And GSh did not do shit.
    Uzin. Bicycle village. Will tear apart any f. Accompanying. Before compartments open.
  38. atamankko
    atamankko 8 June 2016 10: 24
    +1
    Only what the "exceptional" do is safe:
    Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya ..., you can list for a long time.
  39. Alexandr2637
    Alexandr2637 8 June 2016 10: 45
    0
    what, according to the Pentagon, should be interception, so that in the USA they declare the professionalism of the pilots performing it.


    Shoot down to hell! laughing
  40. harlequin73
    harlequin73 8 June 2016 11: 15
    0
    Some kind of unprofessional adversary, militarily we got, is afraid of everything.
  41. Every
    Every 8 June 2016 11: 50
    0
    Well, thank God that Russia is not the only one in the world who does not hesitate to drive the "striped" at its borders. Well done Chinese.
  42. mamont5
    mamont5 8 June 2016 11: 51
    0
    And flying is generally dangerous. Especially for Amer pilots.
  43. Ros 56
    Ros 56 9 June 2016 08: 57
    0
    And can anyone in the world generally intercept professionally striped aircraft? The Indians gave you earcaps on the Su-30MKI with all your troubles and the conditions that you set for them. So gentlemen from the Pentagon would shut up and shut up about professionalism. So what about professionalism, this is for McCain, who almost burned the aircraft carrier.