Media: America for the first time with 2012 r mobilized more than half of its aircraft carriers

44
For the first time in 4, the Pentagon ordered to send four aircraft carriers for combat duty, bringing the number of simultaneously mobilized ships of this type to 6, transmitting RIA News Defense News post.

Media: America for the first time with 2012 r mobilized more than half of its aircraft carriers


Total US Navy exploited 9 aircraft carriers.

The aircraft carrier Ronald Reagan was withdrawn from the Yokosuka naval base in Japan on June 4. Earlier, 1 June sent the Dwight David Eisenhower strike group from the east coast of the United States, which should provide support for strikes against the terrorist organization Islamic State, whose positions are already fired from the Mediterranean by the aircraft carrier Harry Truman. John Stennis continues its mission in South China Sea, ”writes the publication with reference to military sources.

In turn, "aircraft carriers" Carl Vinson "and" George Washington left the bases on the west and east coast of the United States to conduct training maneuvers. "

According to the source, soon “the US Navy will connect to patrol the 7 th aircraft carrier -“ George Bush ”.”

At the same time, the publication's interlocutor emphasized that “the use of courts is not an answer to any particular challenge.”
44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    7 June 2016 09: 55
    Well, well, let them strain. Maybe they won't fart.
    1. +21
      7 June 2016 10: 05
      A hornet’s nest has developed, exceptional ones are being prepared.
      1. +4
        7 June 2016 10: 16
        Quote: cniza
        A hornet’s nest has developed, exceptional ones are being prepared.

        Yes, it will be difficult for them now .... Russia has entered the world geopolitical arena! They will not be in the 90s, now .. Our people like to disorderly and most importantly have something ... hi
        1. +14
          7 June 2016 10: 27
          Quote: CORNET
          Yes, it will be difficult for them now .... Russia has entered the world geopolitical arena!

          And they want to fight, and they are afraid, they are not sure of the results.
          1. 0
            7 June 2016 10: 57
            The starman is their colossus.
            I hope we will also create about a half dozen similar aircraft carriers, at least for 20 - 25 years.
            It is clear that they will not decide the results of global wars, but tremendous pressure can exert local pressure.
          2. +5
            7 June 2016 11: 00
            Quote: volot-voin
            Quote: CORNET
            Yes, it will be difficult for them now .... Russia has entered the world geopolitical arena!

            And they want to fight, and they are afraid, they are not sure of the results.

            They don't want to fight. They want to achieve their goals. "Psychic attack". As always from afar, big and scary.
            1. +3
              7 June 2016 11: 04
              Quote: Mavrikiy
              As always from far away, big and scary.

              Now it’s not scary .... But big! bully
              1. +3
                7 June 2016 22: 01
                Quote: CORNET
                Now it’s not scary .... But big!

                ... yeah ... wink ... "Liana" on combat since the end of 2014 ... two 14F145 "Lotos-S" and two 14F139 "Pion-NKS" detection means:
                - optoelectronic
                - radio technical
                - radio-location
                ... the orbit is about 1000 km., the new system is more versatile - due to the higher orbit, it can scan not only large objects in the ocean, which the Soviet Legend was capable of, but also any object up to 1 meter in size at any point planets. The accuracy has increased more than 100 times - up to 3 meters ... Batonam (949A) is now working, the edge is not open ... a large mattress aircraft carrier, a large Soviet rocket 3M-45 "Granit" ... everyone! ... laughing
        2. +5
          7 June 2016 11: 15
          7 AUG ...?!
          Che, dare to declare war, who only ?! Us...?! These Zezhekans will not have enough spirit !!!
          1. +6
            7 June 2016 12: 19
            Not enough spirit? And then the spirit is not needed, dear. This is when people are standing against each other, the spirit is needed, and when you press a button from the shelter and provoke something, you only need nonsense ... Press and substitute those who are not in the shelter, but nose to nose, will start to fight for their lives .. This is the meaning of the courage of politicians.
      2. +4
        7 June 2016 10: 45
        I’m certainly not bloodthirsty, but I would like at least one of their aircraft carriers to catch a huge iceberg, you’ll declare war on global warming.
        1. +3
          7 June 2016 11: 51
          "In total, the US Navy operates 9 aircraft carriers."
          So the 10th sho drowned? I always said drown!
      3. 0
        7 June 2016 10: 58
        Quote: cniza
        “The use of ships is not an answer to any particular challenge.”

        Here is how. And this "the use of ships is not an answer to any particular challenge."
      4. Dam
        +2
        7 June 2016 11: 09
        War is near
        1. The comment was deleted.
      5. 0
        7 June 2016 11: 30
        At the same time, the interlocutor of the publication emphasized that “the use of ships is not an answer to any specific challenge

        Well, yes, a standard excuse. Extra money appeared, why not drive it somewhere on the Aircraft Carrier? wassat
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +7
      7 June 2016 10: 13
      the war party does its job. conflicts inflame and then they gypsy at the kangres. and everyone is happy except for the people of the planet earth. the old woman hillary directly lobby the military corporations. in turn, they give money for her PR. it is unlikely that the trump will win. they just will not allow it. maps this is so in washington
    4. +4
      7 June 2016 11: 28
      Quote: tiredwithall
      Well, well, let them strain. Maybe they won't fart.

      They do this for a reason. AUG withdrawal on combat duty is worth the money.
      Do not fart, dear.
      And we need to look and draw conclusions.
      It is not for nothing that our docks on Zvezdochka are increased right up to 70/400 meters.
      1. +1
        7 June 2016 12: 42
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        "Psychic attack". As always from afar, big and scary.
        These psychic rifles are loaded and the bayonets are real, so it is better to watch them from an equipped trench holding your hands on the trigger of a greased machine gun and so that "your number two" has nothing to do except loading machine-gun belts. This is poetry from old films, but in reality, for each their exertion of forces has to demonstrate their readiness and ability to resist this force.
        Therefore, whoever says anything, but the deployment of such numerous forces may end with their use (not necessarily against us, but against countries we are not indifferent).
        Therefore, you must have the tools to prevent possible damage or reduce the damage caused. So that their commanders will not let our commanders get bored, their service will be very interesting, the conscripts, after becoming demobilized in a year, will then tell at home at a friendly table how they defended their homeland. And let them be friendly and let them talk, because really protect and in general our youth is good.
  2. +19
    7 June 2016 09: 56
    All these movements are not good.
    1. +7
      7 June 2016 09: 58
      Time works against them, hurry up!
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. +2
      7 June 2016 11: 13

      All these movements are not good.


      I think or is it a panic? If so, then in my opinion this is good news. They just don’t know what to do anymore.
      1. +1
        7 June 2016 12: 48
        This is not panic at all, "this is zhu-zhu-zhu" for a reason. Yankees will not drive so much iron through the water so easily.
    4. 0
      7 June 2016 13: 59
      one said that the attack on Russia would be disguised as a major NATO exercise, that cruise missiles would be launched from all carriers!
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  4. +1
    7 June 2016 10: 01
    And what do they want to say by that?
    That for ISIS they need at least 2 aircraft carriers, because They can’t really bombard B-1, but have forgotten how to do B-52?
    Or are they planning a small, victorious war by September?
    So Bush in 2008 already started. It didn’t end with anything good for Condalisa.
    Then 5 aircraft carriers (4 US + ShdG) in the Persian Gulf did not decide anything.
    1. +2
      7 June 2016 10: 32
      They want a full-fledged invasion of Syria (it is possible that with Turkish hands) - the ILC reports directly to the president, congressional approval is not required, and for this it is necessary to ensure overwhelming superiority in the air and at sea so that our VKS do not rock the boat.
      1. +3
        7 June 2016 11: 22
        Quote: Alexez
        They want a full-fledged invasion of Syria

        It would not be a bad idea to strengthen the coast with "bastions", so that they would be afraid to come close, and with the igil it is necessary to finish faster without a truce, it is desirable that there would be no reason for invasions. Otherwise, they will say that democratic thugs are in distress, the "moderate" opposition has been bombed.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +2
    7 June 2016 10: 05
    These are the main "fighters" for peace and democracy around the world, and for what they are used as not to show off military power. So they probably took them out for a walk.
  7. +4
    7 June 2016 10: 10
    Where are the others???
    The budget is rubber, the machine works around the clock, there is nothing to be shy about.
    1. +5
      7 June 2016 10: 26
      Quote: dobrik10
      Where are the others???
      The budget is rubber, the machine works around the clock, there is nothing to be shy about.

      Let them "float" while eating a lot of money ... In which case, there is something to cover all at once ...!
      1. +5
        7 June 2016 10: 35
        Quote: CORNET
        Quote: dobrik10
        Where are the others???
        The budget is rubber, the machine works around the clock, there is nothing to be shy about.

        Let them "float" while eating a lot of money ... In which case, there is something to cover all at once ...!

        Vital, you put them together in one heap so that you can cover everything at once. soldier
        1. +3
          7 June 2016 11: 10
          Quote: mordvin xnumx
          Quote: CORNET
          Quote: dobrik10
          Where are the others???
          The budget is rubber, the machine works around the clock, there is nothing to be shy about.

          Let them "float" while eating a lot of money ... In which case, there is something to cover all at once ...!

          Vital, you put them together in one heap so that you can cover everything at once. soldier

          With current technology, it’s not necessary ... Lead them! The goals are excellent ... Let these scumbags, some Guadeloupe scare!
          1. +6
            7 June 2016 11: 24
            Quote: CORNET
            Guadeloupe is scared!

            Guadeloupe was already scared. laughing
  8. Tim
    +11
    7 June 2016 10: 10
    Amerikosy again start another muck, these aircraft carriers are not good.
  9. 0
    7 June 2016 10: 10
    As the experience of naval wars shows, a barge of any size needs only one torpedo to slowly, beautifully and smoothly sink to the bottom.
  10. +2
    7 June 2016 10: 11
    Wow, how they got through! Tightened. Well, we'll see how these muscles can withstand such a load.
    1. +1
      7 June 2016 10: 20
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Well, we'll see how these muscles can withstand such a load.



      load ??

      Can you explain?
      1. +1
        7 June 2016 11: 15
        Can you explain?


        A person probably means a financial burden. Given that the American public debt system is mainly internal in nature, and the safety valve is in the form of external lending, the load will be small.
      2. 0
        7 June 2016 11: 28
        Quote: godofwar6699
        Quote: Mountain Shooter
        Well, we'll see how these muscles can withstand such a load.

        load ??

        Can you explain?

        I'll try....
        I remember the United States drove the AUG to the shores of Syria (and the order was to bomb Syria) ... Ours drove there everything possible, "cans" as the liberals put it, to prevent this ...!
        An attempt was made to launch the "tomogavki", we shot them down (it was hushed up somehow ...)
        But Russia defended Syria ... They left! After that, it all started for Russia, or rather we managed! We would have gutted this AUG and there was such an order ... But ours also perished! But now everything is different, such heroism is no longer needed (thanks to our designers of rocketry, etc ... and the workers of the Russian military-industrial complex)) hi Everything will be simpler and unexpected ..
  11. +7
    7 June 2016 10: 15
    What they can move, so they move. The endless exercises they organize in the countries of the "Non-Warsaw Pact" impress no one. We need to drive one aircraft carrier to Tallinn on a friendly visit and park it for half a year. At the expense of the Estonian budget. To be imbued with, to feel their involvement in the process of confronting the Russian threat ...
    1. +2
      7 June 2016 11: 32
      Quote: pft, fkb
      It is necessary to bring one aircraft carrier with a friendly visit to Tallinn and park for half a year.


      Any Amer aircraft carrier in the Baltic or the Black Sea in this case should be 100% equipped with kamikaze ... They understand this, and therefore do not follow your advice ... A clean and naked target, which is under Russian sight in any corner - even hide nowhere to escape and no time ... Although, perhaps, the Estonians would be glad and would not stand up to the costs ...
    2. cap
      0
      7 June 2016 12: 13
      Quote: pft, fkb
      What they can move, so they move. The endless exercises they organize in the countries of the "Non-Warsaw Pact" impress no one. We need to drive one aircraft carrier to Tallinn on a friendly visit and park it for half a year. At the expense of the Estonian budget. To be imbued with, to feel their involvement in the process of confronting the Russian threat ...


      It seems that guests were going to have a drink to devour for free, at the expense of the wretched.
  12. GDV
    +2
    7 June 2016 10: 24
    They want to arrange a demonstration flogging for Kim in one way, and the operation will be called again like "The Wrath of Sheep".
  13. +5
    7 June 2016 10: 26
    Of course, of course, aircraft carriers just went to sea, for a walk ... am It is clear that there will be no lightning fast global strike until the United States has full confidence that the retaliation strike (even several of our missiles) will not reach their mainland, but the concentration of large groups of troops on the eastern border of NATO, mobilizing such a number aircraft carriers, plus to all the constant exercises near the Russian borders, the deployment of more and more missile defense systems ... request
  14. +2
    7 June 2016 10: 32
    Is it possible that they dared themselves so threatening that their brains began to boil?
  15. -3
    7 June 2016 10: 32
    forward our valiant submarine fleet !!! 2 units per aug plus satellites .....
  16. The comment was deleted.
  17. +2
    7 June 2016 11: 05
    Well, let them go, until they are pushed under the tail of torpedoes. I think so, there is already not one of our boats in a nearby position. And from above, the strategists will give hi to the American sailors, there will be joys.
    1. +2
      7 June 2016 11: 36
      Quote: Ros 56
      Well let them be like


      Hmm ... If you calculate how much green money they will eat during this time - it's a nonsense ...

      And ours at this time will be trained on them in the implementation of combat training missions ... The waste approach is for ours ... Fell-wrung out - for Amers ...
  18. +2
    7 June 2016 11: 07
    ... And in the coming night bedbugs began to stir in the mattresses ... bully
    1. cap
      +1
      7 June 2016 12: 16
      Quote: Abbra
      ... And in the coming night bedbugs began to stir in the mattresses ... bully


      Without words. good
  19. +3
    7 June 2016 11: 10
    We fussed about the unkind! Such activity around the border of Russia has not been for a long time! They are beginning to show their "muscles", like a psychological attack! They will watch Russia's response! Even dill intensified shelling of the DPR and LPR, the Armed Forces of Ukraine are trying to infiltrate their DRGs! It's time to somehow curb all our "partners" a little (McFaul's quote)!
  20. +5
    7 June 2016 11: 19
    Something "NATO boys" with the arrival of summer too violently stirred in heaps .. Soon on June 22 .. Are they plotting again to bend some ...
    1. -1
      7 June 2016 11: 47
      Quote: Evil 55
      Something "NATO boys" with the arrival of summer too violently stirred in heaps .. Soon on June 22 .. Are they plotting again to bend some ...

      I remembered the old joke:
      Russian submarine pops up in front of a US aircraft carrier!
      From an aircraft carrier: Heylo Rashen Ivan!
      From the Premier League Soviet captain: You yourself heylo ... Immersion, torpedo attack!
      laughing laughing
      1. cap
        0
        7 June 2016 12: 18
        Quote: CORNET
        Quote: Evil 55
        Something "NATO boys" with the arrival of summer too violently stirred in heaps .. Soon on June 22 .. Are they plotting again to bend some ...

        I remembered the old joke:
        Russian submarine pops up in front of a US aircraft carrier!
        From an aircraft carrier: Heylo Rashen Ivan!
        From the Premier League Soviet captain: You yourself heylo ... Immersion, torpedo attack!
        laughing laughing


        Offset +.
  21. +1
    7 June 2016 21: 25
    So what? At least 20 aircraft carriers. There is a glorious city of Irkutsk, for example, where I come from. The distance from the Pacific Ocean is about 5000 km, from the Atlantic 7-8 thousand, from the Indian one no less, also China is on the way. But from Irkutsk to Washington (almost the middle of the states in latitude) - 9800 km. Across the Arctic. All Siberia, the Urals, and half of the Far East are practically inaccessible to aircraft carriers. And America will have enough missiles there to plow 10 times.