Military Review

British military experts advise NATO to heed the call of the Baltic countries and send well-armed troops there

42
Essential NATO forces, provided with modern weapons, should be sent to the Baltic countries and Poland for their "reliable protection from a massive strike from Russia," the British military said in a report: "Has the time come for the West to wake up and smell vodka?" The highlights of the report are edition Ihs janes.




According to the information, “Sir Nick Carter, Commander-in-Chief of the British Ground Forces, and more than a dozen other high-ranking officers of the British Army, including Brigadier-General Mark Carlton-Smith, Commander of the British forces in Afghanistan, and Assistant Chief General Patrick Sanders, the headquarters of the British defense.

The report says that the alliance "needs to develop responses in addition to creating a rapid reaction force in the Baltic countries and conducting regular military exercises along the eastern border of the alliance." Such a need “emerged as a result of the reunification of the Crimea with Russia and in connection with the situation in the south-east of Ukraine,” the authors argue.

“The decisive factor of the last few years was not the strength of the“ hybrid war ”or military superiority of Russia, but the absence of Western military forces on the ground, in particular, the lack of the need to use them”,
claim the military.

“Moscow can be stopped at the very beginning,” the document says.

Earlier, Sergei Lavrov said that in the Baltic region there are no threats that would justify his militarization. ” At the same time, according to him, Russia reserves the "sovereign right to ensure its security by methods that are adequate for the risks of today."
Photos used:
ruposters.ru
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Andrey K
    Andrey K 7 June 2016 09: 36
    +20
    ... should be sent to the Baltic countries and Poland for their "reliable protection against a massive attack from Russia" ...
    Scared themselves laughing
    This is schizophrenia, NATO should be treated wassat
    Along the way, infected, from our Ukrainian brothers request
    Those, too, have been fighting the Russian Army for the third year and retreat only after a tactical nuclear strike by the "aggressor" wassat
    1. cniza
      cniza 7 June 2016 09: 43
      +18
      Looks like all the men went to work, and the women of the Baltic region suffer without male attention, only in NATO not all men, in vain hope.
      1. smart ass
        smart ass 7 June 2016 10: 32
        +5
        A well-armed Louboutin conchita ghouls will be sent to them
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
      1. CORNET
        CORNET 7 June 2016 09: 48
        +5
        “Moscow can be stopped at the very beginning”

        If you bring us, no one will be able to stop us ... Enough already screaming about the "Russian threat" we got it already! We don't want to fight with anyone, that you barked like that all over Europe, already lays ears ..)))
        1. Ivan Ivanov
          Ivan Ivanov 7 June 2016 17: 55
          0
          But they obviously want to, otherwise why provoke
    3. vkl.47
      vkl.47 7 June 2016 10: 20
      +8
      British military experts .... they are by no means relatives of British scientists
    4. Bobxnumx
      Bobxnumx 7 June 2016 10: 25
      +5
      The British and Americans are good fellows - they directly expose Poland and the Baltic states under attack, and they are beyond the seas, oceans. They do not think about the fact that they will get something worse than the above-mentioned "mongrel".
    5. x.andvlad
      x.andvlad 7 June 2016 10: 25
      +4
      The Anglo-Saxons are scoundrels, as always sowing a collective panic and insinuating against Russia those who are closer to its borders. In the event of a mess, are they really thinking of staying on their smelly island?
    6. Altona
      Altona 7 June 2016 11: 09
      +1
      Quote: Andrey K
      This is schizophrenia, NATO should be treated

      ----------------------
      Yes, the campaign is hard in Battlefild and other similar games played. They began to transfer their "mgralki" and "Wishlist" to nature.
    7. siberalt
      siberalt 7 June 2016 11: 29
      +1
      And who will feed them there, the British or what? laughing
  2. vasdel
    vasdel 7 June 2016 09: 37
    +3
    Fear has big eyes, everyone is looking for an external enemy, but they don’t see the fact that the EU is gradually degenerating (IP) of the Islamic Commonwealth.
  3. megafair
    megafair 7 June 2016 09: 40
    +3
    The Anglo-Saxons always built their policies in such a way that the war would go on in all sorts of Poland, Latvia, etc.

    But the Poles have completely forgotten something about these historical facts ...
  4. ramzes1776
    ramzes1776 7 June 2016 09: 40
    +2
    Themselves in the cauldron of their soldiers are sent home-grown "statues". Let them throw in more, we will have to spend less missiles.
  5. Prisoner
    Prisoner 7 June 2016 09: 41
    +3
    These "civilized" European leaders are all the same boors and b-s-long! Zakharov's rights. "The smell of vodka", how's it! Whoever spoke, but not English drunkards. Move, move. Action gives rise to equal opposition as the Englishman Newton said. Only here this law has its own small Russian amendment. Our opposition is not equal, but generally kirdyk to the acting!
  6. jovanni
    jovanni 7 June 2016 09: 48
    +4
    “Moscow can be stopped at the very beginning,” the document says.

    Well, as much as you can! They are just some idiots! They confuse everything again ... Moscow is hardly starting to move, but if you move, you’ll stop the hell! Then it’s better to scatter and hide. This will be the most prudent response. But it would be better if they didn’t move at all. Do not be dashing while it is quiet ...
  7. V.ic
    V.ic 7 June 2016 09: 53
    +4
    Typically British tactics: sit at the English Channel and bark at Russia.
  8. Berkut24
    Berkut24 7 June 2016 09: 54
    +6
    Come on, pack it all in one place. And then you have to run after your NATO throughout Europe, spend extra fuel, ammunition and time.
  9. Million
    Million 7 June 2016 09: 54
    +4
    I would like to know what kind of response our government is taking?
  10. Alexandr2637
    Alexandr2637 7 June 2016 09: 57
    +4
    The world has definitely gone crazy. No, all this just doesn’t end.
    It looks like "kirdyk" will soon come "ball" .... sad
  11. parusnik
    parusnik 7 June 2016 09: 58
    +1
    Not against Russia, NATO troops are sent to the Baltic states and Poland .. and to protect the regimes there ... But who will admit this ... That’s what they’ll destroy: the Russian threat, world democracy ...
  12. Igor39
    Igor39 7 June 2016 09: 58
    +2
    The Yankees and Angles, they are afraid that the trade and economic ties of European countries such as Germany, France, Italy, with Russia will result in some sort of alliance and lead to the collapse of NATO. Therefore, such Russophobic countries will throw provocations, but EU citizens understand that with it’s more profitable to trade than to fight, which NATO leaders really don’t like.
  13. vit
    vit 7 June 2016 10: 06
    +2
    when in the cities of Britain bearded men from IS will begin to slaughter women and children, the troops on the border with Russia "will be very useful."
    1. mig29mks
      mig29mks 7 June 2016 12: 32
      0
      A survey of the British showed that 78% are ready to move to Russia if they give the land !!!!
      1. Prisoner
        Prisoner 7 June 2016 13: 06
        +1
        They did not quite understand. Fell us like their cousins ​​felled the Indians will not work.
  14. shcishcok
    shcishcok 7 June 2016 10: 07
    +2
    why "smell vodka"? We now have a different strategy - we now have forest dwellers guarding the borders, bears there ... moose ... but they don't drink vodka! one bear came out! and how many impressions! what if a battalion of bears?
  15. edeligor
    edeligor 7 June 2016 10: 08
    +3
    "The Englishwoman crap!" Centuries pass, but the truth does not change. To play off, slander and as a result of all have money on the fight of wild Slavs and second-rate Balts. Divide and rule! Everything is as old as the world ...
  16. Evgen2x
    Evgen2x 7 June 2016 10: 13
    +2
    As in a joke pancake, British experts advise, British scientists have proved) wink
  17. Zakhar
    Zakhar 7 June 2016 10: 16
    +1
    Finns, in any way, the Russian bear broke up !!! laughing
    1. maximus
      maximus 7 June 2016 10: 28
      +3
      yeah .type. Togo)
  18. dobrik10
    dobrik10 7 June 2016 10: 18
    +2
    If you do not want to feed your army, you will feed someone else's. If you don't want to give 2% of GDP to your army, give it to the Pentagon. All the male population left to work somewhere there, "valiant" NATO members will arrive and ... see news from Japan
  19. Ruswolf
    Ruswolf 7 June 2016 10: 23
    +2
    The fact that Britam and the United States are not beneficial to the world is a no brainer. Then everyone will get out of their control. It has always been.
    But Psheks and Balts do not cease to amaze, humiliating themselves. Even shaving openly say that The smell of vodka they prefer the smell of whiskey from British squeak. And they only assent.
    hi
  20. 2s5giacints
    2s5giacints 7 June 2016 10: 24
    +1
    again, hatred with us, with little blood on someone else’s territory. It reminds us of 40-41. There’s also a rearmament, will we have time? For this Stalin is spread rot, like they all talked about German aggression, but he didn’t believe. Then Poland is Ukraine. Only I doubt that they will be the first to attack. They will do their best to provoke. Or, according to the Polish scenario, there will be a provocation in the Baltic
  21. iouris
    iouris 7 June 2016 10: 27
    +2
    Apparently, Khodorkovsky and Chichvarkin convinced the "experts" in London City.
  22. Zakhar
    Zakhar 7 June 2016 10: 27
    +1
    Right! Passed already!
  23. Idiot
    Idiot 7 June 2016 10: 34
    +3
    "They are brutally bombarding our planes, which are peacefully bombing their damned cities" ...
  24. russmensch
    russmensch 7 June 2016 10: 44
    +3
    Substantial NATO forces, provided with modern weapons, should be sent to the Baltic countries and Poland for their "reliable protection against a massive attack from Russia"


    An interesting picture is obtained: The territory of Poland is 312 km², 679 km²- Baltic countries. For comparison, the territory of the Moscow region is 175 km². How can "substantial NATO forces" concentrated on such small areas to be reliable protection against massive impact?
    For example: During the legendary explosion of "Ivan" 50 MT (50 tons of TNT eq.), Stones evaporated.
    The height of the "mushroom" is 64 km. The radius of the "core" (temperature over a million degrees) is 4,5 km. Shock damage - 400 km. from the center. Light impulse (impact) - 270 km.
    From the island over which the charge was blown up, a smooth "licked" stone "roller" remained.
    And this is one thing ... That is, the explosion of one such bomb over Moscow would do irreparable damage not only in the entire Moscow region but also far beyond its borders. Well, the Baltic countries are covered almost completely.
  25. Ros 56
    Ros 56 7 June 2016 10: 46
    +1
    Hey little british, and why are you giving everyone advice, you yourself are weak to come and fight with the Russians. It will take your bully and your island will go, and you will be like rats from the ship where you will run across the English Channel to 30 miles from the Oyropa.
  26. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 7 June 2016 11: 32
    +2
    “The decisive factor in the last few years has not been the strength of the 'hybrid war' or Russia's military superiority, but lack of western military forces on the groundin particular, the absence of the need for their possible application "
    I can’t understand how the deployment of NATO military forces in its eastern defense sector could prevent us from returning Crimea or declare our strong disagreement with the actions of Kiev in the Donbass?
    And how could NATO prevent us from providing humanitarian assistance to the Donbass, or even special?
    Would their rapid reaction forces have landed in Crimea to interfere with our "green men"? Or would they have entered the Ukrainian-Russian border with a fight, allowing the Pravosek to calmly "clean up" Donbass?
    No no and one more time no. Deployment of NATO troops within the alliance, but in the immediate vicinity of our border, as well as practicing rapid projection of force by transferring from the depths and applying to a previously unfamiliar theater of operations, as well as creating material reserves, warehouses of weapons and equipment, building supply chains --- - they have no other choice but to call it “Forced Defense.” However, this disguise does not deceive me, and I understand very well that malicious actions and the object of planned aggression is (what a surprise !!!) my Russia.
    Of course, this is only a military aspect of pressure. There is also an economy that decomposes into socio-political and scientific-technical aspects. But we mainly discuss the war here. And rightly so, this is closest to us.
  27. cap
    cap 7 June 2016 11: 52
    0
    According to the information, “Sir Nick Carter, Commander-in-Chief of the British Ground Forces, and more than a dozen other high-ranking officers of the British Army, including Brigadier-General Mark Carlton-Smith, Commander of the British forces in Afghanistan, and Assistant Chief General Patrick Sanders, the headquarters of the British defense.

    These "advise" advisers x @ jyou. Their ancestors planned all wars after the end of the pirate wars, and this is what they do best.
    "Generals Investigated" is the shortest anecdote after the Jewish turner.
    And the story of Uncle Misha (turner) from Odessa ends with the words:
    - "If I could write, I would live in Odessa and work as a turner at the Hammer and Sickle plant .... in response to a saleswoman's remark, in a jewelry store in the United States:
    - "Why do you carry so much cash with you, it's easier to have a checkbook."
  28. AID.S
    AID.S 7 June 2016 12: 00
    0
    “Is it time for the West to wake up and smell the vodka?”
    No matter how they woke up, smelling something cut off ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
  29. Volksib
    Volksib 7 June 2016 13: 00
    +2
    Completely Obama flies from coils)))
  30. raddy13
    raddy13 7 June 2016 14: 21
    0
    Who needs this sprat?
  31. Olegater
    Olegater 7 June 2016 19: 11
    +1
    Quote: "says the report of the British military" Is it time for the West to wake up and smell the vodka? " Well then, you need to wake up this rotten-toothed, limp creature called the west and let it smell its urine and feces, since there has been nothing good from them for centuries. And especially these indented cobrites will not hurt to smell this smell after adequate actions of the Ministry of Defense of Russia on their exercises. (We will drink vodka after the VICTORY over the jackal as in 1945)
  32. jambo79
    jambo79 8 June 2016 09: 44
    0
    Why not "Is it time for the West to wake up and smell the Vaseline?" Forgot, forgot the experience of the wars with the "Russian Bears"! Nothing, we will remind you on occasion!