Prosecutor General’s Office of Russia refused to extradite Viktor Yanukovych to Kiev
44
The official representative of the Prosecutor General’s Office of Russia, Alexander Kurennoy, told reporters that the Russian Federation Government had replied with a refusal to Ukraine for a request for the extradition of former President Viktor Yanukovych. Recall that a similar request came from Kiev in February last year. Kiev explained the need for extradition of Yanukovych by the “pre-trial investigation in one of the cases” conducted in Ukraine.
RIA News cites the statement of Aleksandr Kurenno:
According to the results of consideration, the petition of the Prosecutor General of Ukraine on the temporary arrest and taking into custody of Viktor Yanukovych was left without execution on the grounds stipulated in the Article 3 of the European Convention on Extradition of December 13 of 1957. What is the Ukrainian side informed.
From the 3 article of the said convention: Extradition is not carried out if the crime for which it is requested is considered by the requested Party as a political crime or as a crime related to a political crime.
The same rule also applies if the requested Party has reasonable grounds to believe that an extradition request in connection with a normal criminal offense was filed with the aim of prosecuting or punishing a person because of his race, religion, nationality or political opinion, or this person’s position may be damaged for any of these reasons.
In fact, the Prosecutor General’s Office of Russia made it clear to the Ukrainian side that the case against Viktor Yanukovych is of an obvious political nature and looks like an attempt to settle accounts with a representative of the previous authorities “Square”.
It is worth noting that in Ukraine, which continues to be lowered in the ranking of countries on the state of affairs in the fight against corruption, Yanukovych is accused of corruption crimes. The charges are being raised against the background of the fact that the current authorities were involved in the so-called Panamanian offshore companies in order to avoid paying taxes to the Ukrainian treasury, according to some Western sources. In this regard, the phrase classic "Who are the judges?" looks very relevant.
kratko-news.com
Our news channels
Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)
“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"
Information