Military Review

Alexei Kudrin said that, together with his colleagues, he is working on a program for Russia's economic development commissioned by the president

134
Last Saturday, 4 June in Moscow hosted a conference with the big name “Challenges-2017”, organized by the Center for Strategic Research - an analytical structure under the government of the Russian Federation. The CSR is an organization about which articles have already been published on our website. And they came out mainly in the “National Security” section, at least because until recently the adherents of ultra-liberalism as an ex-adviser to the President of the Russian Federation, and now, as it turned out, non-systemic “oppositionist”, were in the CSR until recently. »Andrei Illarionov, practically the entire top of HSE in the person of Yevgeny Yasin, Yaroslav Kuzminov and others. It was the Center for Strategic Research that prepared and promoted the basis of the economic policy of the Russian Federation at the beginning of 2000 for execution.

The program, as practice has shown, is simple: investing in gray-green paper, which is called the main currency in the world, as well as accumulating reserves in its greatest mass based on this gray-green paper and its “sister” - Eurocurrency. The program began to obviously slip, as soon as some representatives of the state apparatus had a desire to seriously invest not in pieces of paper, but in the real sector of the economy. With shouts: “Alarm !!! This will ruin the economy !!! ”, the TsSR specialists exhaled loudly and with relief when the federal authorities either refused to make large-scale investments in the aforementioned real sector, or declared that the projects were“ frozen ”and then“ optimized ”.

Today the board of the Center for Strategic Research Foundation, if someone has forgotten, is headed by Alexey Kudrin. That same Alexei Kudrin, who literally the other day announced the “technological backwardness of Russia” and the need “although on the second roles to integrate into the international technological system” for the sake of attractiveness for foreign investors.

So ... In April of this year, Kudrin, the Council of the CSR Fund, headed and now defines the key, you understand, challenges that the country will face in 2017. Apparently, all the challenges of the year 2016-th already leveled ...

Alexei Kudrin said that, together with his colleagues, he is working on a program for Russia's economic development commissioned by the president


From the statement by the chairman of the board of the fund, it became clear that Aleksey Leonidovich is not refusing the idea of ​​"technological mockery that repels investors".

From materials CSR:
According to the results of the discussion in the first direction (the issues of foreign and domestic policy, security - author's note), the main problem was the deepening of isolation from international capital markets and commodity markets. Another challenge in this area is involvement in conflicts in the zone of interests or near the borders of Russia.

In the second direction (institutions, civil society and human capital - author's note), the main problem is the inadequate level of governance, corruption. Also in this area the challenge is excessive state participation in the economy.

Economic growth is hindered by the persistence of high uncertainty and the unattractiveness of domestic investment, the deterioration of the industrial and social infrastructure, as well as the growing technological gap and restrictions on participation in the global technological revolution.


Even if a person did not complete the HSE, then it is clear to him that an attempt to isolate Russia from world markets and draw into armed conflicts along with the deterioration of the industrial and social infrastructure are factors that negatively affect the economy. Was it worth it for the sake of this statement of obvious facts to assemble a whole conference?

It turns out that it was worth it ... For during the conference, Alexei Kudrin told reporters that the CSR is today engaged in "developing the main provisions of the program created by the order of the President of the Russian Federation" for the 2017 year. That is, it turns out that the president himself orders the economic development program to a fund, which by definition should offer such programs to the Russian government. Or is it a hint from President Vladimir Putin that, since the government itself is not ready to create economic programs, then it’s time to rush to the “rescuers” from the HSE and to Alexey Kudrin personally to ask for help ...

And "help", I suppose, will do. Let me predict (even if the forecasts are ungrateful) what the main theses of the “development program” will be, which ultimately will lie on the president’s table under the signature of A. Kudrin. There is an opinion that economic “gurus” will be called upon to focus on Russia “on internal issues”, as well as on putting money into eurodollar reserves even if oil prices are lower than indicators suitable for such accumulations. In other words, the money - in the jug, and on the embrasure made up of pensioners, Dmitry Anatolyevich will again be thrown with his own, which has become a meme, remark: "There is no money, but you hold on." After all, cubic savings, judging by the ideology of the CSR, is generally the main achievement of Russia, unlike any spending on strategically important projects.

Separately - a clear hint of the CSR that Russia "is in vain involved in conflicts at its borders," not to mention the conflict, for example, in Syria. The promise of economic “gurus” is to make Russia “attractive for investors” at any price. Sorry, we are spoiled by the rejection and radicalization of Ukraine, we are being shoved under the missile system of the American missile defense system, they continue to expand NATO, and we must “not get involved”. Well, it seems like we are not particularly involved. Otherwise, the same Ukrainian camarilla, brought to power by the “investors” in Kiev, would have been looking for the fifth corner for a long time ... Do not get involved, keep ourselves in hand, want to reassure Kudrin and the potential investor ... And the investor, you know, does not calm down. It requires that Russia not only be not involved, but also continue to take the visor in the event of any whim of the "exclusive" state in the world. What from the series: "Yes, sir!" And "Yes, sir!"

Russia is not even being hinted at - they are shouting in a foul language: just don't get out of the economic system we are building! Just do not get out of our "charms" - total debt load, which is one of the pillars of servicing the giant American debt. Sanctions, they say, sanctions, and in Russia in your nugget do not stop investing, Russia! Be our Russia! And, oh yeah, - to the heap - “return” to the Crimea ...

But the "partners" had a chance to return again, it would seem, which had begun to think about diversifying the economy of the Russian Federation in the same direction. At the end of May, the United States published a report that Russia reduced investment in the US economy by 42 billion dollars, bringing the volume to 73 billion. According to the total volume of "investments" in the US astronomical debt, Russia was ahead of Turkey, Denmark and India. It is clear that no one specifically cut investments did not - just the case in the course of the ruble against the US currency. But it is alarming "partners." And now they are even ready to “overclock” oil, so that Russia, following the path of the Bammelnian pied pods from the CSR, will again frantically stuff a jug into dollars in volumes of interest to Washington — without a course on strategically important projects in the interests of the population of Russia itself, but with an eye to consumer loans .

Ah, it would be better to be wrong ...
Author:
Photos used:
http://akudrin.ru
134 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, daily additional materials that do not get on the site: https://t.me/topwar_ru

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Ami du peuple
    Ami du peuple 7 June 2016 06: 09
    +28
    Quote: Kudrin
    Economic growth is hindered by ... the depreciation of production and social infrastructure, as well as increasing technological lag and restrictions on participation in the world technological revolution.
    And what did dear Alexei Leonidovich do as Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister? Exclusively "kudrinomics" moved? And now he is stating the facts of infrastructure deterioration and technological backwardness. Maybe you should invest green pieces of paper from the moneybox in production, social services and science? You look and there would not have been such an unattractive picture ... But the "best finance minister" has no understanding of cause-and-effect relationships.
    1. Finches
      Finches 7 June 2016 06: 15
      +32
      Good day, Andrey! hi

      What did you do? Raised the Russian economy from its knees ... laughing

      About 7 years ago, Father, at one of his meetings about Kudrin, who then worked as Deputy Prime Minister, very correctly noted: "He completely consolidated with our scumbags, who blather here with Western money and begin to teach us how to work" Lukashenko, apparently knew something , about the fact that Leshenka receives a salary not in one White House, but in two at once ... laughing
      1. Kostyar
        Kostyar 7 June 2016 11: 20
        +16
        How much more will be outrageous: Chubais, Kudrin, Gref and other evil spirits ....?! The maximum that they deserve is to smear a lobeshnik with green stuff !!!
        1. DIMA45R
          DIMA45R 7 June 2016 13: 48
          +8
          Here's another positive about the privatization miracle ...
        2. atalef
          atalef 7 June 2016 15: 52
          +6
          Quote: Bone
          How much more will be outrageous: Chubais, Kudrin, Gref and other evil spirits ....?! The maximum that they deserve is to smear a lobeshnik with green stuff !!!

          I hope you understand that Kudrin didn’t come by himself. The heading in my opinion clearly speaks
          Alexei Kudrin said that he and his colleagues are working on a program for the economic development of Russia on order President

          but people believe laughing
        3. Oskar1965
          Oskar1965 7 June 2016 18: 07
          +6
          Kostyara, all this is a show for suckers (to which I count myself) who watch TV and hope. that another person has come, he will fix everything. But he will not correct anything, he does not have such a task from the "top" Israeli leadership. All he will do is collect before TV conferences and meetings and talk about how he is going to do it. In general, blah blah blah. Until there is nationalization of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, land resources and basic types of production, we do not move on to a planned economy, nothing will change.
          1. atalef
            atalef 7 June 2016 18: 28
            +4
            Quote: Oskar1965
            v. But he will not correct anything, he does not have such a task from the "top" Israeli leadership

            Why, now Netanyahu in Moscow - can give a task? laughing
            Quote: Oskar1965
            All that he will do is to collect before TV conferences and meetings and say how he is going to do it

            By order of the president of Russia
            Quote: Oskar1965
            Until there is nationalization of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, land resources and the main types of production, we will not move on to a planned economy, nothing will change.

            dilettantism.
          2. sherp2015
            sherp2015 7 June 2016 23: 47
            +2
            Quote: Oskar1965
            Until there is nationalization of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, land resources and the main types of production, we will not move on to a planned economy, nothing will change.


            I dare to assume that under the current government there will be no nationalization, but rather the opposite. All that has not yet been stolen is stolen (privatized).
            I agree with Atalef
      2. bandabas
        bandabas 7 June 2016 11: 45
        +9
        And again he returned to "lift". The deck is shuffled and no one leaves. Only in the buyback.
      3. VSkilled
        VSkilled 7 June 2016 12: 09
        +9
        Exactly...

        Kudrin - 100% "creature" Backstage. The very one under whose dictation (!) The eternally drunk EBN wrote "the new Constitution of the new Russia".

        Kudrin even, not so long ago, naturally (!) "Converted to Judaism", apparently, in order to confirm his absolute loyalty.

        Accordingly, the "economic block" in the Constitution, including the one according to the Central Bank, was developed by "curators from the CIA" (Putin's own term) so that Russia would lie under the West and not rock the boat.
        And Kudrin cannot offer any other "solution", simply "by definition."

        Thus, Russia is either "returning to the fold of Western civilization," with the return of Crimea, the end of support for Assad in Syria, the refusal to modernize the army, etc.

        Or, Russia - is urgently changing its economic model in order to drastically reduce the ability of the West to spoil our economy.

        And - "by the way".

        Not so long ago, a world economic forum was held, where all together (including representatives of Western "economic development institutions") admitted that nothing more effective than the Chinese model has been invented.

        True - there are costs. For example - regular executions of stealing officials, and even (Oh, God!) ... oligarchs!
        1. Mikhail3
          Mikhail3 7 June 2016 18: 17
          0
          Quote: VSkilled
          Kudrin - 100% "creature" Backstage

          Well, hardly. Judging by his actions, he is a protege of a much smaller people. All this economic "genius" has always done is to keep inflation in check. All his deeds, words, trips, work and rest are devoted to this. To the mantra about "investors. Well, what a person does - he is."
          Who benefits from low inflation? Maybe production (I listen to Nabiulina about it - almost tears flow)? Of course not. Production does not care about inflation, if it is not hyper. Manufacturers produce goods and want to be bought. Part of the amount ate inflation? We put it in the price and produce it again, without any problems.
          Maybe to the financiers (backstage type)? This does not care. They withdraw money from any jumps, as long as something moves. Who then? Yes, just thieves. Those who grabbed during the collapse of the USSR. They grabbed ... that's all. They are not manufacturers, not financiers, they do not know how to do anything! Such people.
          Here they are the very "investors" and are. Billions have been taken out, and now they are slowly being imported. But they are not able to make a profit. Where does the thief get the profit, he is a thief, not an employee. In general, the money of these people stolen from the USSR is all that they have. And inflation is unbearable for them! She eats Big Hapk's product! People have opened up holdings and corporations and are sitting. Smooth. On the pope. The secretary is forced, deals are made, factories are opened ... nothing is working, money is being eaten and nothing more. And then there's inflation! So they hired Kudrin.
          That's all. Our country is great, but the "owners" are small now. Such ... with curls on a leash.
          1. atalef
            atalef 7 June 2016 18: 30
            +5
            Quote: Mikhail3
            Who benefits from low inflation?

            All
            Quote: Mikhail3
            Production does not care about inflation if it is not hyper

            What do you say, and production loans are no longer needed? belay
            Quote: Mikhail3
            Manufacturers produce goods and want to be bought. Part of the amount ate inflation? Put it in the price and produce it again, without any problems.

            gut laughing
          2. Cat man null
            Cat man null 7 June 2016 22: 53
            -2
            Quote: Mikhail3
            Who benefits from low inflation? ... Yes, just thieves. Those who grabbed during the collapse of the USSR. They grabbed ... that's all. They are not manufacturers, not financiers, they do not know how to do anything! ...

            Here they are the very "investors" and are. They took out billions, and now they are slowly importing them. But they are not able to make a profit. Where does the thief get the profit, he is a thief, not an employee. In general, the money of these people stolen from the USSR is all that they have. And inflation is unbearable for them! She eats Big Hapk's product!

            People of holdings and corporations have come back and are sitting. Smooth. On the pope. The secretary is being pressured, transactions are being conducted, factories are being opened ... nothing is working, money is being consumed and nothing more. And then inflation yet! So they hired Kudrin

            So laughing

            I’ll shorten it so as not to lose meaning:

            - Nobody needs low inflation, except for the rich, who are eating up their wealth. They don’t do anything else, since they don’t know how to do anything I feel sorry for them ... they’re not fit for life at all ... And what prevents them from hiring an intelligent manager who will cherish, nurture and increase their money? Nothing, in general ... or people really really ... that ??

            - and inflation is unbearable for them, as it eats Big Hap product why would? This "product" (money) is in foreign currency ... or people are just idiots ... and inflation does not harm the currency in any way, because it cannot ... break the pattern ...

            - These people opened up holdings and corporations and sit doing nothing ... as? They don’t know anything! Or did they hire a manager?

            - transactions are carried out, factories open ... pancake! how! they are "doing nothing" ... still breaking the pattern ...

            - and nothing works for them ... then the manager needs to be changed, and only ...

            - and then there is inflation I repeat - if "savings" are in foreign currency, then they do not care about inflation. If the "savings" in rubles (YYYYYYY laughing ), then the owner is a clinical oligophrenic, and nothing will help him anymore.

            But, as a rule, there are no such among those who "managed to grab". They died out in the process of "hapka", they were simply eaten ...


            In general, your model does not work ... it just does not work request

            And then the question is: for whom does Kudrin "work"? Charade... what
            1. Mikhail3
              Mikhail3 10 June 2016 10: 16
              0
              I got late, but maybe someone is interested ...
              1. Managers steal. For a thief, this is a disaster (no one has the right to steal. Except him !!) And Soviet thieves cannot check his activity. They stole under Soviet law. But in the bourgeois economy, they are not completely oriented. By the way, when the yen strengthens, the Japanese government flies in retirement in disgrace. And not only the Japanese ... fools, yeah.
              2. In currency, everything is more dangerous and dangerous; they are being robbed more and more impudently. I have to carry here.
              3. Most of the enterprises were stolen by them and reissued. In holdings and corporations. They do not do it themselves, there are special firms for that. Not managing.
              4. Together with the huge piece that he stole. Three or four managers and you can go to the wipers. Remember Moldova - the owner of a network of gas stations in Moldova and Ukraine? A good man purse came out of it.
              5. Once again, for the "Educated". There is a whole industry in the West - a scam of indigenous thieves who stole money from themselves and took it to the "safe" West. Techniques have been worked out for decades, how our oligarchs can resist them only when they are fully covered by Russia. Available? The Rotenbergs are safe, no matter how much they are frightened by sanctions. But Berezovsky ...
              So they can save money only here. In Russia. Oligophrenic, yeah.
      4. Altona
        Altona 7 June 2016 22: 15
        +2
        Quote: Finches
        Lyoshenka, she receives her salary not in one White House, but in two ...

        --------------------
        Putin took Lyoshenka to try again to "integrate into the West." Otherwise, it would be necessary nafig with the advice "to invest in currency." Stupid idea.
    2. Andrey Yuryevich
      Andrey Yuryevich 7 June 2016 06: 18
      +27
      "rake dancing" will continue? Here are just a few of Kudrin's "mistakes", if only THIS can be called "mistakes": First, the failure to implement the law on the monetization of benefits, for which he himself admitted his guilt.

      Secondly, he “missed” the corrupt official Storchak, whom he kept under his own wing with his deputy, and, having protested, did not condemn the thief, but began to defend him fervently.

      Thirdly, despite the promise that its purpose is not so much to increase as to save, foreign exchange reserves, he placed at least a quarter of them - more than $ 100 billion on debt obligations of two American mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Exactly a year ago, Kudrin, speaking to the deputies, assured them that despite the difficulties of these private companies, their assets were “the most reliable”. Now only a madman will buy their paper. Kudrin didn’t answer for this colossal mistake, moreover, a year ago he added to the post of minister, also the title of deputy head of government.

      Fourth, Kudrin in recent years has been doing everything possible to restrain the development of the Russian economy, not giving the regions the means to develop infrastructure. He unreasonably explained his greed by the fact that, they say, otherwise inflation will increase in the country, and therefore petrodollars must be withdrawn abroad and placed on the American financial market. And it was extended!

      However, as we know, Americans, for example, came out of the Great Depression by investing money in infrastructure, especially in road construction.

      Kudrin’s policy has led to the fact that the real sector of the economy is suffocating and continues to suffocate from the absence of not only cheap, but generally loans, and medium and large businesses, instead of borrowing money inside the country, are forced to seek borrowed funds abroad. As a result, Russia's public debt is growing, and the West has got a great opportunity to slow down the development of large strategic programs in Russia through the sudden termination of lending.

      The economist Mikhail Khazin directly accuses Kudrin and another liberal - the head of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation Sergey Ignatiev “of the death of Russian industry, in particular, engineering and metallurgy, as a result of which, in reality, the Russian economy may fall by 25%." As a positive example, Khazin rightly cites the former Central Bank chairman Gerashchenko, who in three years increased the money supply in the country by 10 times, while inflation and demand for dollars fell, and the economy revived.

      Fifth, as far back as 2003-2005, the acute issue of increasing the share of gold in the gold and foreign exchange reserve was actively debated in Russia. The central bank even called the desired specific figure - at least 10%. Unlike other countries, however, nothing was done. On the contrary, the gold percentage fell from 5,7% in 2004 to the current 2,9% and did not grow at all during 2008!

      The responsibility for this rests entirely with the sweet couple of pro-Western financiers Kudrin-Ignatiev. By the way, the leaders of the Russian gold mining industry call Kudrin exactly the curator of their industry.
      http://www.liveinternet.ru/users/2858488/post
      1. mihasik
        mihasik 7 June 2016 10: 31
        +12
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        : ... First, the failure to implement the law on the monetization of benefits, for which he himself pleaded guilty.
        Secondly, he “failed” the corrupt official Storchak, whom he kept under his own wing with his deputy, and, having defended, did not condemn the thief, but began to defend him fervently. Thirdly, fourthly, fifthly ...

        And now a simple question: Who appointed him (Kudrin) there?
        Is it like: "Nakasipurili, correct yourself or such political masochism of the Guarantor?"
      2. Vasiliev Yu
        Vasiliev Yu 7 June 2016 14: 44
        +4
        Fourth, Kudrin in recent years has been doing everything possible to restrain the development of the Russian economy, not giving the regions the means to develop infrastructure. He unreasonably explained his greed by the fact that, they say, otherwise inflation will increase in the country, and therefore petrodollars must be withdrawn abroad and placed on the American financial market. And it was extended!

        However, as we know, Americans, for example, came out of the Great Depression by investing money in infrastructure, especially in road construction.

        He wrote more than once: he himself heard all these words from the ADVISOR to PRESIDENT Dvorkovich.
        Now this is not an adviser, they have been appointed to another position. But when they start to kick out for stupidity with shame, and not transfer to another position, then something will begin to improve in the economy and government.
      3. atalef
        atalef 7 June 2016 16: 09
        +5
        Hi, Andy, I have a few questions
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Secondly, he “missed” the corrupt official Storchak, whom he kept under his own wing with his deputy, and, having protested, did not condemn the thief, but began to defend him fervently.

        the criminal case was in 2007 - then there was a war of elites and security forces crushed everything for themselves, but
        In December 2011, following his former boss A. Kudrin, he predicted the onset of a new recession in the Russian economy [12].
        In May 2012, after the inauguration of President of Russia V. Putin and the formation of a new government, Storchak was reappointed.

        and still remains on it
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Thirdly, despite the promise that its purpose is not so much to increase as to save, foreign exchange reserves, he placed at least a quarter of them - more than $ 100 billion on debt obligations of two American mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Now only a madman will buy their paper. XNUMX

        those you say that 100bn are in these companies - and these securities are worthless - that is, they were at least stocks or their bonds - I honestly doubt that this is true - the amount is too big
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Fourth, in recent years, Kudrin has done everything possible to restrain the development of the Russian economy, not giving the regions the means to develop infrastructure. He unreasonably explained his greed by the fact that, they say, otherwise inflation would rise in the country

        he is right - in the regions they would be immediately cut and cashed
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        However, as we know, Americans, for example, came out of the Great Depression by investing money in infrastructure, especially in road construction.

        they stole less
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Kudrin’s policy made the real sector of the economy suffocate and continues to suffocate from the absence of not only cheap, but also loans in general, and medium and large businesses, instead of borrowing money inside the country, are forced to seek borrowed funds abroad

        nothing can be done, inflation in the country, and the discount rate a priori cannot be lower than inflation
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Economist Mikhail Khazin directly accuses Kudrin and another liberal - the head of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation Sergey Ignatiev “of the death of Russian industry

        Khazin and Glazyev generally blame the master, while they themselves did nothing
        Quote: Andrey Yurievich
        Fifth, as far back as 2003-2005, the acute issue of increasing the share of gold in the gold and foreign exchange reserve was actively debated in Russia. . On the contrary, the gold percentage fell from 5,7% in 2004 to the current 2,9% and did not grow at all during 2008!

        And rightly so, gold after 2008 only got cheaper
        1. Vasiliev Yu
          Vasiliev Yu 8 June 2016 15: 20
          0
          atalef
          Hi, Andy, I have a few questions

          So the whole point of the talk here is about theft, corruption and stupid officials.
          These conversations have been going on for years, but what's the point? Why the guarantor could not push through in the same Duma laws that were thought out against the stupidity of officials, their inaction, corruption and theft. And the main thing is to ask them publicly, every day. The Duma in our country adopts laws in hundreds, where can we think, but the majority did not intend, for them it was only important to get a feeding trough in the Duma. Always with ... cats outraged the bosses, who declare `` we need to start working well with ourselves, '' but they themselves do not think to strain, nah ... er it is necessary, let it be ... it strains, it exists for this ...
          The correct analogy here was with truancy in the Duma and in production.
          Okay, I parted ways, I just heard about Gazprom again, and I had to pay off their debts to the state, and that’s billions, not a penny (knowing how they ... shaved 200 billion in Ukraine. And the banks also owed their debts common people are extinguished. Profit is always theirs, debts are extinguished at the expense of us. Well settled).
    3. populist
      populist 7 June 2016 06: 24
      +17
      Ami du peuple
      And what dear Alexei Leonidovich did

      Oh how! Even respected ?!
      The problem is not in Kudrin and his kudrinomika, but in the person who has returned this political agent to the political life. belay
      1. Ami du peuple
        Ami du peuple 7 June 2016 07: 04
        +7
        Quote: populist
        Oh how! Even respected ?!
        Well, yes, a respected and authoritative person in certain circles. To which, unfortunately or fortunately, I do not belong
        Quote: populist
        The problem is not in Kudrin ... but in the person who has returned this political agent to the political life.
        The main problem is that a quarter of a century ago the Soviet Union was treacherously destroyed (by the way, under the cheers ofоmost of its citizens). Kudrin and someone else there are just a consequence of this greatest tragedy. For example, in the USSR Aleksey Leonidovich would be a middle-ranking official in the Leningrad City Council. And now I would wait for a well-deserved pension.
      2. Michael67
        Michael67 7 June 2016 07: 07
        +4
        Exactly. Please announce, Alexei Leonidovich, WHICH WILL BE? Who do you work for?
        1. Gardamir
          Gardamir 7 June 2016 07: 33
          +16
          WHOSE WILL BE?
          Putin's he.
          1. troyan
            troyan 7 June 2016 08: 19
            +11
            Quote: Gardamir
            Putin's he.

            Exactly. moreover, I don’t think that Kudrin blurted out just for the sake of a red word:
            ... during the conference, Alexei Kudrin told reporters that the CSR today is engaged in "developing the main provisions of the program created by order of the President of the Russian Federation"
          2. PHANTOM-AS
            PHANTOM-AS 7 June 2016 13: 11
            +9
            Quote: Gardamir
            WHOSE WILL BE?
            Putin's he.

            Case No. 144128.
            In 1999 The Investigative Committee found that A. Kudrin signed an agreement on the provision of the Twentieth Trust Corporation (the head Sergey Nikeshin is a deputy of the Legislative Assembly of St. Petersburg) with state loans worth several million dollars, and the corporation transferred money to more than two dozen companies in Spain, Finland, Sweden , Germany, Belgium, Ireland and the USA.
            By order of V. Putin, the corporation was allocated money allegedly with the aim of organizing the rest of veterans. In 2000, the criminal case was dismissed. Quote from Novaya Gazeta: “Former senior investigator, one of the leaders of the investigation team in the Twentieth Trust case, Andrei Zykov, said that they had unprecedented pressure on the investigation. Field investigator Oleg Kalinichenko, who collected information on the case, subsequently went to the monastery. Zykov filed a civil lawsuit against Putin. However, the court received a letter from the presidential administration stating that Putin cannot be a party to the process. ”
            http://igorolin.livejournal.com/38251.html
        2. Gomunkul
          Gomunkul 7 June 2016 13: 38
          +4
          Exactly. Please announce, Alexei Leonidovich, WHICH WILL BE? Who do you work for?
          It's not a secret:
          THE BEGINNING OF A CAREER ALEXEY KUDRIN From 1983 to 1985 and from 1988 to 1990, Alexei Kudrin took an active part in the work of the Leningrad Institute, specializing in the study and analysis of socio-economic problems.

          Alexei Kudrin was one of the members of the group led by Anatoly Borisovich Chubais, which developed new concepts for the free enterprise zone. Already in 1990, Kudrin became deputy chairman of the committee on economic reforms, which was created in the Executive Committee of the Leningrad City Council. In autumn 1991, he served as deputy chairman of the committee on managing the free enterprise zone at the St. Petersburg City Hall.

          From 1991 to 1992, Alexei Kudrin was appointed to the post of Deputy Chairman of the Committee for Economic Development and Investment Policy. For a short time (from 1992 to 1993) Aleksey Kudrin was the head of the Main Financial Department, after which in early 1993 he headed the committee of the City Hall for Finance and Economics in St. Petersburg. An important period in the life of Aleksei Leonidovich was 1994, when he was appointed deputy mayor of St. Petersburg, but already in 196 he left his post and resigned. During 1996-1997, Kudrin headed the Main Control Directorate and at the same time was Deputy Head of the RF AP Boris Yeltsin.

          A little later (from 1997 to 1999), the politician was the deputy of Anatoly Chubais, Minister of Finance. Vladimir Putin was declared his successor and head of the Main Control Directorate. At the end of 1999, Alexei Kudrin became the first deputy chairman of the board of JSC UES of Russia. In 2000, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin initiated the appointment of Kudrin to the post of Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation and Minister of Finance of the Russian Federation.
        3. The comment was deleted.
      3. vlad_vlad
        vlad_vlad 7 June 2016 14: 19
        +3
        The problem is not in Kudrin and his kudrinomika, but in the person who has returned this political agent to the political life.


        you don’t understand anything - it's a tricky plan, a multi-way.
        Che you all attacked Kudrin? he is a performer, an instrument. Putin decided that it was necessary.
        Do not agree? then to court. well, or in the party, well, or where else.
        1. Vasiliev Yu
          Vasiliev Yu 8 June 2016 15: 26
          +1
          Quote: vlad_vlad
          The problem is not in Kudrin and his kudrinomika, but in the person who has returned this political agent to the political life.


          you don’t understand anything - it's a tricky plan, a multi-way.
          Che you all attacked Kudrin? he is a performer, an instrument. Putin decided that it was necessary.
          Do not agree? then to court. well, or in the party, well, or where else.

          Tedious. Not everyone will understand.
    4. Aleksandr72
      Aleksandr72 7 June 2016 07: 08
      +14
      Well, you all know what exactly is stopping a bad dancer. But the personnel policy of the President of Russia deeply respected by me (it is enough for me that Russia is now reckoned with in the world, and not as with the ever-memorable EBN) I am somewhat (to put it mildly) surprised and alarmed: the names of people holding important government posts, to which they, in theory and on a cannon shot, cannot be allowed to you all well known. And Kudrin is also from the same "galaxy". That one is still "analetig".
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 7 June 2016 07: 37
        +7
        considered in the world
        Did they tell you this in the world or on a highly respected television?
      2. tomket
        tomket 7 June 2016 08: 14
        +13
        Quote: Aleksandr72
        I am somewhat (to put it mildly) surprised and alarmed: the names of people occupying important government posts, to whom, in theory, and on a cannon shot, you must all know well. And Kudrin is also from the same "galaxy". He's still "analetig".

        I am very much surprised "There is no money, but you are holding on there." So it's tempting to ask how THAT can be in power?
        1. troyan
          troyan 7 June 2016 08: 22
          +15
          Quote: tomket
          I am very much surprised "There is no money, but you are holding on there." So it's tempting to ask how THAT can be in power?

          And you are not surprised why the president keeps all "these" in power?
          And there will be elections and the majority of those who come will vote for "EdRo", and hence again for "these". And in 2018, again for the same.
        2. Stirbjorn
          Stirbjorn 7 June 2016 08: 52
          +10
          Quote: tomket
          I am very much surprised "There is no money, but you are holding on there." So it's tempting to ask how THAT can be in power?

          Well, how can some of the hurray-patriotus object - "keep the enemy closer to you," or something like that. This is all the HPP is
          1. Vasiliev Yu
            Vasiliev Yu 7 June 2016 15: 00
            +5
            Quote: Stirbjorn
            Quote: tomket
            I am very much surprised "There is no money, but you are holding on there." So it's tempting to ask how THAT can be in power?

            Well, how can some of the hurray-patriotus object - "keep the enemy closer to you," or something like that. This is all the HPP is

            Yes, when I read this, I’m even sometimes lost by such a go ... otism, I always can’t completely believe in the stupidity of the interlocutor. But constantly convinced, there is no limit to the perfection of the human mind :).
        3. sunzhenets
          sunzhenets 7 June 2016 10: 50
          +9
          I am very much surprised by "No money, but you are holding on there."

          And this is another program "Challenges-2016", organized by our state. Also on the list:
          - innocent Serdyukov;
          -convicted Vasilyeva;
          -exchanged Savchenko;
          - Academician-hero of Russia, and much more.
        4. Tambov Wolf
          Tambov Wolf 7 June 2016 13: 02
          +5
          And you will also ask how to name the person who puts IT in power again, instead of, as it were, to put it mildly, to advise the brown bear to the Kolyma with the Druzhba chainsaw on how best to cut the forest.
        5. Vasiliev Yu
          Vasiliev Yu 8 June 2016 15: 37
          -2
          For the sake of truth, I can still protect Medvedev.
          Well, he is not an orator, and he can’t figure out anything on the move, because of the speed of his thinking, he cannot be compared with Zhirinovsky. He blurted out the truth, but in words, the first that got into his head. Couldn't disguise the truth, `` correctly '' file
      3. coolvoldik
        coolvoldik 7 June 2016 14: 22
        +2
        While the “liberals" are in power, the crisis will continue, as will the sanctions against us. In addition, it is not very clear when Putin will begin to build the logic of socialist governance (at least partially). It seems to me that if he does not do this, then his very fragile balance will at some point be rather quickly destroyed and he will have to leave. In this case, it’s rather naive to speak about the forecast — the situation will be peddling.
        Mikhail Khazin

        The only thing I would add to the above. Economics and any economic program is a tool to achieve a specific goal. And there are only two goals, within the framework of the evolution of social relations. A company in which the consumption produced by this product society:
        a) It is private in nature.
        c) It is of a public nature. (according to the Russian mentality - fair)
        There is also a certain "hermaphrodite" in the form of the Chinese model.
        Since, in Russia communal the nature of social relations has evolved over the centuries, then the Western model that Kudrin and Co. represents. not viable in our harsh conditions.
        1. gladcu2
          gladcu2 7 June 2016 16: 31
          0
          coolvoldik

          Such a model is not viable in any country.
          Capitalism works as long as there are resources. As soon as the resources are already capitalized from the pockets of the overwhelming majority, into the pockets of units, capitalism begins to devour everything it reaches. Starting from the state (sale of state property).
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. siberalt
      siberalt 7 June 2016 08: 22
      +3
      If the HSE and RSU do not close the stamping frames for the 5th column, then someone needs this. hi
    7. Vadim237
      Vadim237 7 June 2016 09: 37
      -6
      Kudrin Kudrin, but an obstinate fact - from 2000 to 2016, together with the crisis of 2008 and 2014, production in Russia showed significant growth - especially in agriculture, and you need a piggy bank as you can.
      1. sa-ag
        sa-ag 7 June 2016 10: 30
        +1
        Quote: Vadim237
        especially in agriculture

        Are you talking about cereals? What about animal husbandry? In my opinion, a decrease in the number of livestock affected the decrease in the amount of grain, i.e. cattle didn’t need as much as before
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 7 June 2016 12: 57
          -4
          And what about livestock farming - we have only cattle problems, and we already overtook the USSR in chickens and pigs and overtook the collection of cereal crops, last year there were record potato harvests and that's not all.
          1. gridasov
            gridasov 7 June 2016 13: 02
            +1
            The lack of comprehensive analysis models will only create new problems. Behind the growth figures of the same livestock or chickens and produced meat are environmental problems and the utilization of derivatives of these industries. A raw material base is required. A whole range of system solutions is needed for everything to work and not get worse than it is. Otherwise, "with a piece of meat in your mouth, you can end up in shit and without fresh air and water."
          2. Vadim237
            Vadim237 7 June 2016 16: 09
            0
            Well, at least in agriculture it will soon catch up with the USSR.
    8. Oorfene Deuce
      Oorfene Deuce 7 June 2016 09: 47
      +3
      Alexei Kudrin said that he and his colleagues are working on an economic development program
      Personally, I only had a headline ... No offense to Volodin, but I did not read further. It seems to me that everything is already predictable ...
    9. The comment was deleted.
    10. siberalt
      siberalt 7 June 2016 10: 11
      +4
      With such a "performer" as Kudrin, they really won't be able to bury it.
    11. g1v2
      g1v2 7 June 2016 11: 26
      -6
      One not stupid person said - "3 things are needed for the war - money, money and money again." The $ 200 billion accumulated in funds is not the same money. which could give some kind of leap in the economy. This is minuscule. But in the event of a war, for which our state has been preparing since 2009, it is with this money that we will fight. It is with this money, placed in what can be sold even in case of war, that the shortage of food, medicine and necessary equipment will be covered. It was this money that saved us in 2009 and helped us in 2015. It is from this money that funds are taken for large-scale infrastructure projects and the deficit is covered. Tch I for the egg-capsule with hands and feet. In my opinion, any intelligent person has something set aside for a rainy day in order to hold out for a while if there is force majeure or something else. What's stupid or criminal? request
      In general, I am amazed how the media and their masters manipulate the layman. They create in him such a stable opinion in which from time to time they still throw shit.
      Here 90 percent of the townsfolk are sure that it is sawn and shredded. Unicellular do not even know what it is and what it is eaten with, but pick up any inhabitant in the middle of the night and he will say that it is cut. Rusnano built 65 factories, no one knows what they produce, but they are firmly convinced of one thing - cut. It’s customary to scold the stabilization funds, but what it is and why no one knows. But any unicellular computer knows that these evil liberals have come up with some kind of crap. Or they created a firm opinion that Serdyukov is a thief, AND HIS REFORM IS THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ARMY. No one found a penny stolen, BUT ALL SURE - THIEF. The Chinese are so impressed with the reform that they want to repeat it at home, but the single-celled one knows better. A stable matrix of thinking has been created for him, and he will break any mouth for it. Everything that is being built was ordered under Serdyukov, but it is easier for the layman to believe that the engineers were secretly riveting something underground, but the villain Taburetkin ordered the development. am
      Damn, people, I don’t care about you. They openly manipulate you, think for you, but you really think that this is your own opinion and any facts that contradict him, you sweep away without reading.
      Or the story of a teddy bear in the Crimea - no money, good mood. They just cut the video and no one even doubted it, did not start looking for the original, but immediately carried it.
      And this bike is about 146 percent in the election. Who do you think stole something from? Zhirik scored 50 percent in your opinion or the elderly Zyu? Or maybe Kasyanov with Nemtsov? But each unicellular repeats about 146 percent and that the election was dishonest. And so every time - one stuffing for unicellular after another. Eve, no one bothers anymore, so that the stuffing is at least somehow similar to the truth - people pick it up. At least about 146 percent, at least about the cut. It's disgusting. recourse
      1. Tambov Wolf
        Tambov Wolf 7 June 2016 13: 08
        +7
        Dear comrade, if this money was in the country and at least partially worked, then there is no problem. And when they are in the USA and they can always take it away, freeze it and generally do whatever the Jewish lobby in the USA wants with it, then this is pure wrecking, implying the shooting without trial.
      2. jetfors_84
        jetfors_84 7 June 2016 13: 47
        +4
        I’m afraid that you won’t be able to fight for money deferred by Kudrin, because the little egg is not in your hands but far beyond the ocean.
        1. jetfors_84
          jetfors_84 7 June 2016 14: 00
          +7
          Or they created a firm opinion that Serdyukov is a thief, AND HIS REFORM IS THE DESTRUCTION OF THE ARMY. Nobody found a penny stolen, BUT ALL SURE - THIEF

          Yes, you’re holding us for fools, my friend. Or do you really think that Vasilyeva existed there by herself? Both the base and the road to it were built without his participation of course. Then what is this minister who does not know what is being done?
          And the evidence, I think everyone knows that in some cases we only have a hint of a crime, and in others they require proof of their own hand signed by God.
      3. Vasiliev Yu
        Vasiliev Yu 7 June 2016 15: 25
        +2
        I didn’t feel like answering all this ... otism, since everything is on the surface:
        It was this money that saved us in 2009 and helped in 2015.

        If money was invested in the development and construction of production initially, then the stabilization fund would not have to be helped in 2015.
        Rusnano has built 65 plants, no one knows what they produce

        The fact that Chubais has a lot of money, we know, and what is produced at these plants? Secret? Or are all the achievements so small?
        [quote No one found a dime stolen]

        Serdyukov and relatives built their honestly earned and bought all the real estate.
  • Mordvin 3
    Mordvin 3 7 June 2016 15: 27
    +2
    Quote: g1v2
    At least about 146 percent, at least about the cut. Nasty

    And here I am disgusted to read your comment. Can Taburetkin give a couple more awards? They call us an open threat, and we support them. And yes, you licked robust.
  • gladcu2
    gladcu2 7 June 2016 16: 06
    0
    Ami du people

    I do not agree with you.

    Green papers should be given to people, so that they would create a demand for goods in the market. Then domestic investors will boost production. But how to do it?

    Yes, simple. Already said 100 times.

    Let absolutely all salaries through the state. And then the state will give another 20%. And in the future it will strictly control payments and indexation of salaries. And with the help of salary control, you can get objective statistics for confident production planning.

    Here's how to do it.
    1. atalef
      atalef 7 June 2016 16: 14
      0
      Quote: gladcu2
      Green papers should be given to people, so that they would create a demand for goods in the market. Then domestic investors will boost production. But how to do it?

      Yes, simple. Already said 100 times.

      Let absolutely all salaries through the state. And then the state will give another 20%. And in the future it will strictly control payments and indexation of salaries. And with the help of salary control, you can get objective statistics for confident production planning

      Want to nationalize the entire industry and service sector?
  • sherp2015
    sherp2015 7 June 2016 23: 44
    +1
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    And what did dear Alexei Leonidovich do as Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister?


    Imagine how Kudrin is working on a program ...
    after his "work" I'm afraid that the Russian economy will sink into oblivion
  • volodimer
    volodimer 7 June 2016 06: 12
    +1
    Yes, this gang-watering can be felled for a long time had to be sent. But that g @ apparently doesn’t sink at all.
    1. Alena Frolovna
      Alena Frolovna 7 June 2016 06: 39
      +13
      STUMP

      There was a stump in the forest. It has long stood in the shade of trees. And once on a spring day he creaked throughout the forest:
      –I am the oldest!
      And he triumphantly looked around.
      The trees dutifully nodded their tops.
      “Yes, yes,” they confirmed. “You are the oldest.”
      “But no one compares to me in the fortress,” the stump continued. - Does anyone mind?
      No no! You really are still strong, ”the trees confirmed.
      The stump tasted good. He puffed up and said:
      - I'm the smartest!
      “You, you are the smartest,” others agreed.
      An impudent stump sprouted a root from the ground and, scratching a rotten poppy, said:
      “You interfere with me.” Stand here, freeze the sun.
      “We’ll, we’ll catch,” the trees obediently rustled
      Stump grunted with pleasure and ordered:
      - In general, this: leave me alone! You do not let me think, balabolki!
      And the trees receded, forming a large clearing with a stump in the middle.
      Now he was taking sun baths, and all the time he thought how smart he was and how he got himself right in life. “That's what it means to look at the root!” He mused.
      But very soon the sun withered him, and the wind carried the dust into the clearing.

      Morality:

      Although the stump looked at the root, it didn’t see anything,
      I didn’t understand, because his time was long gone.


      George Kapianidze
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 7 June 2016 06: 16
    +16
    What good can he plan?
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 7 June 2016 06: 33
      -1
      Quote: armored optimist
      What good can he plan?

      As we had one candidate for deputy here, for any reason he was broadcasting: "To work, to work and to work," but he did not know what and how to do. Well, an exact copy of Kudrin, only of another party. By the way, does Kudrin know how to work, or just like the others just la-la-la according to an American piece of paper?
  • Vladimir 1964
    Vladimir 1964 7 June 2016 06: 19
    +8
    Kudrin is pursuing an economic policy not in the interests of Russia, Medvedev is "crying, there are no attendants," the government, together with the central bank, solves financial difficulties at the expense of the people! In general, there are adequate and competent managers in our country, at least a little working in the interests of the people and the state? repeat
    1. olimpiada15
      olimpiada15 7 June 2016 07: 43
      +5
      Quote: Vladimir 1964
      But in general, adequate and competent managers remained in our country, at least working a little in the interests of the people and the state? repeat

      Even if there are any, who will allow them to power?
      How will the current elite live if it ceases to rob the country and the people? They do not know how to make money, and therefore production in the country is not developed. They only have trial schemes working.
      What is an investment? At its core, this is an invitation to participate in a trial of a country and people by foreign companies. Obviously this is democracy, when the opinion of the people is ignored.
      1. wanderer_032
        wanderer_032 7 June 2016 08: 25
        +7
        Quote: olimpiada15
        Obviously, this is democracy when the opinion of the people is ignored.
        1. wanderer_032
          wanderer_032 7 June 2016 08: 28
          +5
          And another picture in the topic:
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 7 June 2016 09: 43
      .
      I pay taxes, and then let them figure it out for themselves what they’ll go who plunders them and so on - my business is small.
      1. Karabin
        Karabin 7 June 2016 12: 38
        +6
        Quote: Vadim237
        I pay taxes, and then let them figure it out themselves

        So what are you, (North Ole ...) the ideal Edro-Putin electorate.
        1. Vadim237
          Vadim237 7 June 2016 13: 03
          -6
          And such an electorate as I in Russia is 70% of the total population, and for Putin in general, all 90% - Alas, you are in the minority.
          1. Vasiliev Yu
            Vasiliev Yu 7 June 2016 15: 47
            +2
            Watch less TV. In my environment of simple hard workers, Putin is now 40 percent, although they are not interested in politics or economics. They just get their salaries and go shopping with these handouts. For some reason, their thoughts are of the same type, they themselves have poverty, and we are still helping Donbass and Syria. They are ... for all the arguments that they need help, they have one concept - "their own shirt is closer to the body." I think it will not be a big surprise that voters lose confidence in the fall and 2017 elections for the authorities, if they do not do something extraordinary for their rehabilitation.
            1. gridasov
              gridasov 7 June 2016 15: 55
              -1
              Literate people understand that ratings burst like soap bubbles. Any social. Payments or non-payments instantly change the rating index. Therefore, it is hardly worth relying on the opinion of people who do not have the qualifications to give an analysis to one or another political or economic process. Therefore, censorship in a new quality is clearly needed, which would correctly conduct its work in the field of forming an adequate assessment of the perception of the activities of the authorities in different social networks. groups of people.
    3. Vasiliev Yu
      Vasiliev Yu 7 June 2016 15: 31
      +1
      Quote: Vladimir 1964
      Kudrin is pursuing an economic policy not in the interests of Russia, Medvedev is "crying, there are no attendants," the government, together with the central bank, solves financial difficulties at the expense of the people! In general, there are adequate and competent managers in our country, at least a little working in the interests of the people and the state? repeat

      Remained, and many agree with me. Only they are pin ... dos and they work for pin ... dos.
      1. Vladimir 1964
        Vladimir 1964 7 June 2016 22: 18
        0
        Quote: vasiliev yu
        Remained, and many agree with me. Only they are pin ... dos and they work for pin ... dos.

        The idea is certainly interesting, colleague, but for some reason because they stayed, only they are "the very" and work for these "very", the welfare of the people does not increase, but on the contrary, theirs is growing. what
        1. Vasiliev Yu
          Vasiliev Yu 8 June 2016 16: 00
          +1
          For this, they were created to work for a pin ... dos, not for us.
  • Odysseus
    Odysseus 7 June 2016 06: 24
    +10
    I can even immediately say what kind of program it will be.
    Obey the United States-privatize everything-trade for dollars-retirement age raise-social and military spending cut-money invest in the West. And most importantly, develop democracy laughing
  • Nix1986
    Nix1986 7 June 2016 06: 24
    +2
    I’m interested in something else, Kudrin, other persons, this is good, but in general we have Min.Economy. Development and something that has not been heard for a long time. Those. There is a specialized body, a whole structure with its own staff, amr cars, good sn, bonuses and other goodies. What are they doing ??? Again, it was just necessary to employ close persons ?! And on the topic, is a return to Kudrinomics planned again? But now there is no superprofit from oil, what to put off then ?! Yes, while we are selling a small egg, but maybe if we didn’t put the small egg, and financed projects in the real sector, then a small egg would be unnecessary?
  • Armored optimist
    Armored optimist 7 June 2016 06: 24
    +16
    Liberasty, incomplete gallery.
    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 7 June 2016 06: 44
      +11
      Quote: armored optimist
      Liberasty, incomplete gallery.

      Which one from Eburg is there? Spit on the Yolkin Center on my behalf.
    2. godofwar6699
      godofwar6699 7 June 2016 07: 14
      +11
      Quote: armored optimist
      incomplete gallery.


      let me add hi

    3. Karabin
      Karabin 7 June 2016 12: 40
      +5
      Quote: armored optimist
      Liberasty, incomplete gallery.

      The darkest sterkhovod forgot.
  • samarin1969
    samarin1969 7 June 2016 06: 35
    +4
    Kudrin clearly points out his Napoleonic perspectives. His analytical presentation ends with the words

    "The materials of the conference will be used in the formation of a strategy for the development of Russia after 2018."
  • mamont5
    mamont5 7 June 2016 06: 43
    +6
    Quote: armored optimist
    What good can he plan?

    He works out his "western" salary.
  • Shiva83483
    Shiva83483 7 June 2016 06: 47
    +2
    To the Kolyma of the enth geckonomist, let him practice in practice ... otherwise everything is theoretically, theoretically. Theory without practice, dead weight in one word ....
  • wanderer_032
    wanderer_032 7 June 2016 07: 13
    +4
    Alexei Kudrin said that, together with his colleagues, he is working on a program for Russia's economic development commissioned by the president

    If American - then I believe.
  • Ros 56
    Ros 56 7 June 2016 07: 15
    +4
    This is the most depressing thing, the decisions are made alone, we all have to suffer and can’t do anything, even fill our faces.
  • parusnik
    parusnik 7 June 2016 07: 26
    +7
    In other words, money is in a piggy bank .... Indeed, judging by the ideology of the CSR, egg-saving accumulation is generally the main achievement of Russia, unlike any spending on strategically important projects.
    Ladies and Gentlemen!
    Now you will hear a tragic and instructive story about the boy Billy, who loved ...... yes, he loved money.

    Tell me!

    Since birth, Billy has been a pay-boy.
    Had Billy a hobby -
    He loved money
    Loved and saved.
    All children, like children, live without worries,
    But Bilka doesn’t eat. Yes, he doesn’t eat and drink -
    He puts it in a piggy bank.

    Money, money, crap,
    Forgetting peace and laziness
    Make money make money
    The rest is all rubbish, poor thing!

    Here is a penny, there is a shilling, and somewhere a pound!
    Billy became a con
    Fraudster and rogue -
    Accumulated a whole pound.
    But the fact of the matter is that he is not alone,
    Who loved money more than anyone else.
    He forgot it!

    Money, money, crap,
    Forgetting peace and laziness
    Make money make money
    The rest is all rubbish, poor thing!

    Ladies and Gentlemen!
    Give someone as much as you can!
    1. wanderer_032
      wanderer_032 7 June 2016 07: 55
      +3
      Quote: parusnik
      But the fact of the matter is that he is not alone,
      Who loved money more than anyone else.
      He forgot it!


      That's right. Just not Billy, but Lesha.
    2. Vasiliev Yu
      Vasiliev Yu 7 June 2016 15: 51
      0
      Funny, true in the subject.
  • fif21
    fif21 7 June 2016 07: 37
    +6
    Kudrin- "Trojan Horse" of the Fed. Why is the dollar and the euro a commodity, and the ruble is the equivalent of a commodity? Why is Kudrin interested only in foreign investors and foreign loans? Why is the price of Russian oil set by a group of brokers on the London Stock Exchange and Russia does not interfere in the pricing process? Why do Western companies cheat in their reporting, while Russian "analysts" take their word for it? Why does Russia not create problems for competitors? .... Because the economic bloc of the Russian Federation works in the interests of the West, but not in the interests of its country. hi
  • Gardamir
    Gardamir 7 June 2016 07: 46
    +7
    gentlemen moderators sorry instructed cons and still instruct. because I did not expect such contempt for our president. because only the president determines the personnel policy. and if the president invited this person, then he is quite happy with him. therefore, I think the spitting in the direction of the man whom the president chose is spitting in the president.
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 7 June 2016 08: 17
      -4
      Quote: Gardamir
      therefore, I think the spitting in the direction of the man whom the president chose is spitting in the president.

      - already thinner, but, IMHO, it’s still a bit thick laughing

      Rate the snippet:

      Quote: http://expert.ru/2016/05/30/kudrin-putin-zhestkij-razgovor/
      Some participants in the meeting of the Presidium of the Economic Council under the President (held on May 25) told the Vedomosti newspaper that Alexei Kudrin called on President Vladimir Putin to reduce geopolitical tensions, arguing for the needs of the economy, announced the country's technological backwardness and tried to convince the President of the need to integrate Russia into international technological chains, even on the sidelines.

      In his response to these proposals, the president said that Russia was not the first to start a conflict, that it has a thousand-year history and it will not trade in its sovereignty. Vladimir Putin promised to defend Russia's sovereignty for the rest of his life. He believes that one should not succumb to provocations, which only increases tension. The President also emphasized the sustainability of the interest of foreign business in working in the Russian Federation.

      - and now guess from three times whether the "Kudrin program" will be implemented wink
    2. ProtectRusOrDie
      ProtectRusOrDie 7 June 2016 08: 19
      -5
      Quote: Gardamir
      gentlemen moderators sorry instructed cons and still instruct. because I did not expect such contempt for our president. because only the president determines the personnel policy. and if the president invited this person, then he is quite happy with him. therefore, I think the spitting in the direction of the man whom the president chose is spitting in the president.


      Good afternoon,
      I agree with you Leonid.

      By the way - I propose to think about this.

      As a result of the collapse of the Soviet Union - we (Russia in particular) had a full set of nails hammered down our throats - from large-scale recruitment of the leadership / party apparatus (the so-called training in economic schools in the West) to assistance in plundering national wealth, destroying military, economic, the spiritual potential of the country, etc. etc. It was not for nothing that many leading Western politicians of that time spoke seriously, they say, "Russia will not rise in the future" ...

      After all, a number of these nails sit in our "throat" to this day (Western economic advisers of our economic apparatus, a hand on the SWIFT switch, a burning torch at the ready in Kyrgyzstan, and a number of others of which a very narrow circle of people is aware).

      I’m talking about the ongoing game of fool on our part, aimed at misinformation / leveling of a possible threat from Russia to the West.

      Questions to members of the forum participating in this discussion:
      -Do you really seriously think that the West has no trump cards left in its sleeve (both external and internal) - with which they could attach us to bloody snot ??

      -Do you really think that V.V is a fool or a puppet and is not able to really assess external and internal threats?

      It turned out long ..
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. fif21
      fif21 7 June 2016 09: 15
      +6
      Quote: Gardamir
      therefore, I think the spitting in the direction of the man whom the president chose is spitting in the president.
      The failure of economic policy is the failure of the President! Who is arguing? request Therefore, the power block we have has our own successes, the economic block is focused on the American model (where Russia is a raw materials appendage) and therefore not successes. hi
    5. The comment was deleted.
    6. AID.S
      AID.S 7 June 2016 11: 35
      -2
      Maybe a new principle is being born - "listen to Kudrin and do the opposite"?
  • 31rus2
    31rus2 7 June 2016 07: 49
    +10
    Dear, enough is enough, the only one responsible is President Putin, if the system does not work, and the president does not try to carry out reforms (personnel, structural), then the responsibility is on the president, and Kudrin is just the same tool
  • Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 7 June 2016 07: 51
    -4
    I really hope that Putin will listen to this bastard, take only some constructive points from his moronic program, and throw this collaborative, disgusting dirty trick into the trash.
    Putin strongly discredits himself, humbling with such rubbish.
    1. Mordvin 3
      Mordvin 3 7 June 2016 07: 57
      +14
      Quote: Volzhanin
      I really hope that Putin will listen to this bastard, take only some constructive points from his moronic program, and throw this collaborative, disgusting dirty trick into the trash.
      Putin strongly discredits himself, humbling with such rubbish.

      Holy simplicity. crying
    2. Cat man null
      Cat man null 7 June 2016 08: 21
      -7
      Quote: Volzhanin
      Putin will listen to this bastard

      - already listened, the result - at the link below


      - Kudrin's program, like others, will be "creatively reworked"

      Quote: GDP
      ... Russia was not the first to start the conflict, it has a thousand-year history and it will not trade in its sovereignty ...

      That's something like yes
  • aba
    aba 7 June 2016 07: 51
    +5
    And now they are even ready to “disperse the oil”, so that Russia, following the path of the Hameln Pied Piper of Central Russia, will again start frantically stuffing dollars into the volumes of interest to Washington - without a course on strategically important projects in the interests of the population of Russia itself, but with an eye on consumer loans .

    This is understandable: without political freedom and independence, there is no economic independence. And liberals believe that both are foreign to Russia.
  • Kostya Andreev
    Kostya Andreev 7 June 2016 07: 54
    .
    everyone knows that the United States came out of the depression using the gold of the USSR in which the industrial revolution took place.
    a remark about, does not give money for the development of regional infrastructure, doesn’t it seem to you that these funds will be used for other purposes, for example, to improve the image of the authorities? regarding loans and business. I want to ask you. Do you yourself do business or just theoretical calculations and tips?
    About Kudrin. As far as I know that the little egg on which
    We live now organized by Kudrin. And do not talk about the fact that it was necessary to invest this money in industry because now capitalism and giving the money to state private owners is stupid. The result is a mailbox at the price of a car. About how Kudrin restrained economic growth. He personally forbade the participants in this dispute to open a business ?. Create jobs? No, it is not forbidden. It’s just one thing to give Ka advice on developing infrastructure and industry while sitting on the couch. And it’s another to try it yourself
    1. wanderer_032
      wanderer_032 7 June 2016 08: 01
      +6
      Quote: Kostya Andreev
      As far as I know that the little egg on which
      We live now organized by Kudrin.


      What kind of little egg does anyone live here? Where are you from - a clown?

      Most people in Russia of working age live off by earning their own labor. And fairy tales about all sorts of egg capsules, go and tell your sandbox neighbors.
    2. wanderer_032
      wanderer_032 7 June 2016 08: 09
      +2
      Quote: Kostya Andreev
      And do not talk about the fact that it was necessary to invest this money in industry


      Well, yes, they had to be given to the USA, you live very well. That is, invest in the US economy. To the United States invested this money in the development of its economy.
      An impressively "wise" decision.
    3. wanderer_032
      wanderer_032 7 June 2016 08: 10
      +2
      Quote: Kostya Andreev
      because now capitalism and giving state money to a private trader is stupid


      And all over the world, the rest of the states invest state-owned funds in the economies of their countries. Oddly enough.
      1. Vadim237
        Vadim237 7 June 2016 09: 52
        -1
        Yes, that's just all the countries - invested in all countries, as an example, China owns US papers for $ 1,300 billion not frail investments - business is nothing personal.
        1. wanderer_032
          wanderer_032 7 June 2016 15: 05
          +1
          Quote: Vadim237
          China owns US securities on 1,300 billions of dollars are not frail investments - business is nothing personal.


          At the same time, China - first raised its economy to first place in the world. Those. At first, the Chinese authorities seriously invested in the economy of their own country. And not vice versa.
          1. Vadim237
            Vadim237 7 June 2016 23: 23
            0
            What they invested in their economy is a large part of what they produce in their country is a copy of what they created all over the world, the whole population is cheap labor, one third of the population is in poverty, ecologically China is the dirtiest country in the world - most of the population in fact, they’re sitting on a powder keg - a week doesn’t go by, if something explodes or lights up with all the colors of the rainbow, as an example the explosion of 700 tons of sodium cyanide last year in Tianjin - even one milligram getting into the human body leads to death.
    4. gridasov
      gridasov 7 June 2016 14: 13
      -5
      Absolutely in solidarity and apparently therefore I have the same number of minuses. Russia was becoming in a new capacity under very difficult conditions of attacks and almost a knockout. Nevertheless, thanks to many of the above-mentioned people, and not only the GDP was able to rise, establish itself and develop in the right direction. The same analysis of many statements by forum admirers indicates their inability to see the situation from the perspective of those who control the country and the economy. It is easiest to blaspheme and express dissatisfaction, and only those who know the situation and statistics can give practical recommendations are justified. Therefore, I think the common people need to deal substantively with those issues in which they are competent
  • 0895055116
    0895055116 7 June 2016 08: 13
    +1
    There is an old rule: If you don’t know HOW TO COME - ASK A WOMAN - LISTEN and MAKE A WRONG! Let Kudrin develop his program, present it - and RUSSIA will need to do exactly the opposite of his program!
  • olimpiada15
    olimpiada15 7 June 2016 08: 16
    +4
    The Russian economy, even without Kudrin, has already turned into a people-fleece-nomic.
    Consider the example of housing and communal services. It would seem that housing is owned by the population, and the owner should decide the maintenance of housing, especially since the money comes from the pocket of the population. But numerous orders on housing and communal services instruct the population to pay, pay more, and the authorities are looking for ways to increase fees. Overhaul should be carried out, the housing stock is worn out and residents feel it through leaking roofs, pipes, etc. How to solve this? Create conditions for overhaul. If the house has good collection of rents, say 90% arrives on time, people need to be given the opportunity to start overhaul, namely, the meeting decides on a certain type of repair, repairs are carried out, a loan is issued for the missing funds at the lowest rate. The loan is guaranteed to be repaid, the rent is going to be stable, the residents will live in the renovated house, the house will not be destroyed, one problem is solved. Repair workers will receive a salary, i.e. the country will increase demand for goods, which will spur the economy. Given that there are many houses in the country, the contribution to the economy will be significant. What about today? Financial speculators consider overhaul money as a means of enrichment, a source of speculation. For banks, this is long money, a means of enriching banks. So the people are robbed for the purpose of enrichment under a plausible pretext. And with overhaul, things are still there.
    The country needs real production, which gives a stable salary, and taxes, not investments, are necessary for the treasury, investors will have to pay forever for this money. It is clear that for corrupt people this is an eternal income, only the people are not able to endlessly pay for their Wishlist.
    1. troyan
      troyan 7 June 2016 08: 29
      +5
      Quote: olimpiada15
      It is clear that for corrupt people this is an eternal income, only the people are not able to endlessly pay for their Wishlist.

      Judging by the elections and ratings, the people are quite willing to "be patient here".
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 7 June 2016 13: 08
      0
      "The country needs real production, which gives a stable salary, and taxes for the treasury" - These are built every year in Russia, but these factories and enterprises will reach full payback in 4-6 years.
  • drop
    drop 7 June 2016 08: 46
    +8
    Interestingly, we have a RAS, there is the Institute of Economic Forecasting, it is not involved in work. At one time, I and A. Volsky had to talk with this gang, which included Kudrin. They did not give a single ruble to invest in industry. All exported to the west. If they are not removed, everything will be as before. I have the honor.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 7 June 2016 09: 56
      0
      We do not invest in industry, but private traders and foreign investors, plus additives from the state.
  • Stalnov I.P.
    Stalnov I.P. 7 June 2016 09: 04
    +6
    As long as I louse, Kudrin will give advice to the guarantor, and he will listen and implement these advice, WE will never raise the economy. Those who are guilty of the crisis in the country, and the government bears all responsibility for this crisis, are NOT ABLE to take the country out of the crisis there are no such examples in the world, NO !. According to statistics in the country, 23 million people live below the poverty line and after that we are offered to love and respect the authorities, which are engaged in their self-admiration, which is mired in corruption, moreover, from the very top, and all these people are now writing a program for overcoming the crisis, after this programs are the main part of the POPULATION OF RUSSIA, as the proverb says: "he will walk without pants." As one of the site's members wrote about these "comrades" this Gang, and bandits in a normal, rule-of-law state are DESTROYED, in extreme cases, they are imprisoned for many years in places that are not so remote, but we have them in power. AND I WILL TELL YOU!
  • Kudrevkn
    Kudrevkn 7 June 2016 09: 31
    +2
    Read the recently published material of Moisey (please do not confuse with the liberal Marat) Gelman about the role of the Central Bank (and personally Naebullina and Yuldaeva) in the bankruptcies of Russian banks and many questions will disappear by themselves! If from the financial system of the country first (2013 -16) "bleed" 1,2 trillion. rubles, and then "reserve" 1,3 trillion rubles in the West, then are they "in deficit" or "lost money as a result of a fall in GDP by ...%" and money "found"? It's like in communicating vessels: if it has disappeared somewhere, then it has arrived somewhere ?! And no Kudrins, Ulyukaevs and Glazyevs need to be "involved in the development and writing of a program of Russia's development strategy until ... 3000?" on a trading day, so that the rest of the officials do not know ?!
  • vovan50
    vovan50 7 June 2016 09: 36
    +3
    Damn, well, when will these idiots from "Ekonomiks" be sent to their native USP at the end !!! am
  • iouris
    iouris 7 June 2016 09: 56
    +1
    There are market principles, there are capitalists in the country, there is a state that reliably protects the gains of capitalism, but there is no market. It is time to give Glazyev his program, and send Kudrin somewhere ... to the stone chambers, take a break from the works of the righteous, for what is planned is achieved exactly the opposite.
  • Million
    Million 7 June 2016 10: 03
    +5
    I do not like this politician, oh I do not like ...
    1. Al1977
      Al1977 7 June 2016 10: 26
      -5
      Quote: Million
      I do not like this politician, oh I do not like ...

      Like or not, you can evaluate your wife’s borscht. A politician is effective or not.
      Here the economy under Putin is not effective. Indicator - share in world GDP and average salary and pension. And whether I like it or not, this is the tenth matter. I only like my wife)
      1. Million
        Million 7 June 2016 10: 43
        +2
        this politician may be effective, but not necessarily for Russia.
        PS. and I don’t like him as a politician, there was no other thought
        1. Al1977
          Al1977 7 June 2016 11: 31
          -4
          Quote: Million
          this politician may be effective, but not necessarily for Russia.

          I live in Russia and only evaluate by its indicators.
          Politicians do not interest me at all, they are balobols, on whom nothing depends, but ministers and the president can be evaluated.
          I evaluate the level of my salary, standard of living, and pension of my parents.
          Under Kudrin, my income was higher. The work is the same. Employment sector - supply of industrial equipment.
          Under Kudrin, there were more investments, construction of enterprises was more, respectively, and more work and salary.
          And all these enemies at the gates, the 5th column and other "geopolitics" leave here for the couch-hurray-patriot-warriors.
          With his departure, it didn’t get better, I will say more, it’s so bad, as now, I haven’t. Instead of modernization, all enterprises buy only spare parts.
          So rate the new ministers. Do you like them or not.
  • Al1977
    Al1977 7 June 2016 10: 22
    +4
    But the “partners” had a chance to return again, it would seem, the economy of the Russian Federation that had begun to think about diversification in the previous direction

    The Author's key word was "seemed".
    Neither the first nor the second anti-crisis plan of Medvedev (although they are classified for some reason) showed reforms in this direction.
    Our government has only one plan, and the president announced it "we must be patient."
    And the prime minister confirmed "There is no money, you are holding on here, all the best to you, health"
    And Kudrin has nothing to do with it. Not Curls are now grandmothers in the USA, but the president. He and only he can accept or not make such decisions, neither Siluanov, nor Obama, and not even Sobchachka, his ego last name is Putin ... maybe this is a secret, of course, for someone.
    1. wanderer_032
      wanderer_032 7 June 2016 15: 09
      +1
      Quote: Al1977
      And the prime minister confirmed "There is no money, you are holding on here, all the best to you, health"


      The hit of the season:

  • gridasov
    gridasov 7 June 2016 10: 49
    -8
    It always looks very funny when people of various social and professional levels begin to discuss the country's top leadership and, moreover, give advice. Is it possible for any person who does not come into contact with the problems of issues and who in their complex these elites decide, at least to comprehend. Of course not! Therefore, the processes of the 2000s and all other time levels were decided on the basis of the operational situation at the level of the information that was available to the highest echelons of power. However, it’s another matter whether the modern information and analytical departments, under the leadership of the country, are able to analyze the entire totality of changes and their trends. This is a question! The fact is that the further, the more the parameters of the information events themselves in the human community and in the whole structure of human existence change. The dynamics of the transformation of events, the polarization and opposition of various structures of the community, etc., has significantly increased. In other words, humanity has entered an era of turbulence. But turbulence, as a physical phenomenon, does not even have an exact definition. This is far from chaos. Therefore, firstly, it is worthwhile to find methods for a new mathematical analysis of such high-potential processes, including in the community of people, and only then rely on a harmonious solution or search for solutions.
  • dummy
    dummy 7 June 2016 12: 06
    -2
    Quote: Andrew Y.


    The economist Mikhail Khazin directly accuses Kudrin and another liberal - the head of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation Sergey Ignatiev “of the death of Russian industry, in particular, engineering and metallurgy, as a result of which, in reality, the Russian economy may fall by 25%." As a positive example, Khazin rightly cites the former chairman of the Central Bank Gerashchenko, which in three years increased the money supply in the country by 10 times and at the same time inflation and demand for dollars fell, and the economy revived.

    Well, Khazin mentioned the hero !!! Gerashchenko was glad about Russia? Yes, it was Comrade Gerashchenko, even before the collapse (in a year !!!) of the USSR in 1990, that he began to create a legislative base for the Central Bank of the Russian Federation. It was under the leadership of Gerashchenko in 1993 that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation caught up with the refinancing rate to 210%, which without privatization in itself led to the collapse of any production, created a half of the country shuttles and a banking system with capital from behind the hill.
    1. Al1977
      Al1977 7 June 2016 12: 36
      +2
      Quote: Dummy
      It was under the leadership of Gerashchenko in 1993 that the Central Bank of the Russian Federation caught up with the refinancing rate to 210%, which without privatization in itself led to the collapse of any production, created a half of the country shuttles and a banking system with capital from behind the hill.

      That is, I just decided to catch up to 210% in the morning and "caught up" by lunchtime. Do you think this is how everything works in the country?
  • Next
    Next 7 June 2016 13: 08
    +1
    I put "-" but not an article, but news. It is a pity if it really is.
  • kirgudu
    kirgudu 7 June 2016 13: 15
    +4
    When will these "experts" be used for their intended purpose in felling?
  • kagorta
    kagorta 7 June 2016 13: 18
    -2
    First, wait for the program, and then we will not read much and think little or little. Maybe something sensible will be there. The President cleverly spread all. He gathered everyone and said cards on the table. But Glazyev and Kudrin are two poles of economic thought, and the truth is somewhere nearby.
  • Forever so
    Forever so 7 June 2016 13: 37
    +2
    Today, only a foolish person can broadcast about future Western investments, provided that we stand up in crustacean and spread the bread. It is shamefully silent that all investments will be in the form of a naked member. I do not understand the president, but more and more often an old joke comes to mind about a pot-bellied Georgian and doctors who persuaded them to tell the Georgian that he was pregnant. Well, here is the ending ... the Georgians are walking along the street, crying, and they are shouting from the window - Gogi, calls, we will drink wine, we’ll play in a point. Fatit, replies Gogi, play out.
  • Prisoner
    Prisoner 7 June 2016 13: 42
    0
    Took the GDP loafers deed. Let them puff in both holes with zeal and do not get confused underfoot. He remembered something about his foreman, who had handed over his felt boots in August. All summer, the soldiers beat out dust from these boots for this figure believed that a soldier who has 5 minutes of free time is a potential criminal. These free time cars, and the potential is not even like a soldier.
  • Tektor
    Tektor 7 June 2016 15: 10
    -2
    The stupid article turned out like blah, slander and sketches on material sucked out of the finger. We ourselves fence the Mui Ne, and immediately "expose" it ... I congratulate the author, who "did not read Pasternak, but condemns".
  • petrovihdanil
    petrovihdanil 7 June 2016 15: 14
    +1
    Kudrin is working on a program commissioned by a President?! ....
  • Grave With Cross 3
    Grave With Cross 3 7 June 2016 16: 27
    +3
    So, Putin brought Kudrin back. Kudrin is a "great friend" of Russia. One has to wonder how Russia can withstand all these "friends of Putin": Kudrin, Gref, Dvorkovich, Abramovich, Medvedev, Roldugin, Vasilyeva, Serdyukov. Maybe someone will vomit again with a "cunning plan"? Aren't you tired of yourself?
    "And Putin is worthy of respect just for praising Boris Yeltsin!"
    He brought Kudrin back, opened the Boris Yeltsin center - this is normal! A "tricky plan" for zombies! Enjoy!
    1. wanderer_032
      wanderer_032 7 June 2016 17: 21
      0
      Quote: Grave With Cross 3
      One has to wonder how Russia can withstand all these "friends of Putin": Kudrin, Gref, Dvorkovich, Abramovich, Medvedev, Roldugin, Vasilyeva, Serdyukov.


      In the end, the phrase is good about this:

  • Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 7 June 2016 17: 19
    0
    in in, by order of whose president he is silent
  • Svetlana
    Svetlana 7 June 2016 17: 33
    +2
    Quote: populist
    Ami du peuple
    And what dear Alexei Leonidovich did

    Oh how! Even respected ?!
    The problem is not in Kudrin and his kudrinomika, but in the person who has returned this political agent to the political life. belay

    And this only confirms that this person does not have real full power in the country. The country is completely dependent on the West, despite the appearance of confrontation with it and some independent actions. If we do not stop the current government's economic policy, i.e. Do not completely change this pro-Western government, then there will not be a deep crisis, there will be a disaster. But this, apparently, is the aim of the plans. And the "man", apparently, is simply not able to change anything. The forces are not equal. Or afraid for himself. Or wars. But, as one of the holy elders said: if there is no war, we will all die.
  • sinoptic
    sinoptic 7 June 2016 17: 46
    +3
    Alexei Kudrin said that he and his colleagues are working on a program for Russia's economic development

    The phrase is a joke.

    The concepts of "Kudrin" and "economic growth" are absolutely incompatible.
    1. atalef
      atalef 7 June 2016 17: 55
      0
      Quote: sinoptic
      times - a joke.

      The concepts of "Kudrin" and "economic growth" are absolutely incompatible.

      Kudrin refers himself to the liberal spectrum of economists [45]. During the leadership of Kudrin, the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation carried out a large-scale tax reform: a “flat scale” of income tax was introduced at 13%, sales taxes and sales taxes were eliminated, VAT and income tax rates were reduced, the total number of taxes was reduced by three times, many loopholes in the legislation that were used to evade taxes were eliminated, internal offshore companies, etc. were eliminated. As a result of the tax reform, the tax burden was reduced for almost all types of businesses. A budget reform was also carried out, the Stabilization Fund was created, and the volume of state external debt was sharply reduced. Whereas in the late 1990s, Russia's state external debt exceeded 100% of GDP, then by 2011 its volume had dropped to one of the lowest in Europe [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78].

      Kudrin is an adherent of a conservative fiscal policy [79]. For most of his leadership of the Ministry of Finance, Russia's federal budget was surplus [76].

      In 2011, at the Krasnoyarsk Economic Forum, he described his vision of Russia's economic problems and development prospects, indicating among the risks the dependence on the oil and gas sector [80].

      In December 2011, shortly after Kudrin’s resignation as head of the Ministry of Finance, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin said that Kudrin “did a lot to strengthen the country's economy.” Putin said he was proud that a man like Kudrin worked in his government [5
    2. Vadim237
      Vadim237 7 June 2016 23: 28
      0
      And the indicators from 2000 to 2016 showed the same strong economic growth - only here expenses also increased significantly.
  • Ivan Ivanovich
    Ivan Ivanovich 7 June 2016 17: 58
    +2
    Oh, and I do not like this Kudrin ... Not our man
  • high school student
    high school student 7 June 2016 18: 36
    0
    An economic development program may have several options.

    First option:
    We ourselves, people with passports of a citizen of the Russian Federation, will build houses, roads and everything necessary for comfortable living. We will provide ourselves with food products and medicines of our own production of proper quality, we will design and manufacture machines that improve life and safety, we will raise and educate our children, relying on our national identity, traditions and history. In a word, we ourselves will create our own social structure suitable for the majority of those living in the country, called Russia.

    Option two:
    Aliens arrive and do all of the above for us.

    Option Three:
    Aliens do not fly, and all the plans and the above will be done by "foreign investors".

    For some reason, I suspect which option Alexey Leonidovich will propose.
    And foreign investors do not sleep at night, they think about point number 1.
    1. Vadim237
      Vadim237 7 June 2016 23: 37
      -1
      We already do all that is stated in the first version ourselves - together with option three. It’s just that some people with passports of citizens of the Russian Federation are not professional, do it at random, hammer, steal, cover or do not do their job at all - hence the problems throughout the country.
  • Grave With Cross 3
    Grave With Cross 3 7 June 2016 22: 56
    +4
    Well, it started.
    "Russia will pay pensions to former Soviet citizens living in Israel"
    Medvedev, pensioners of Crimea:
    "There is no money, but you are holding on. Good mood to you!"
  • oops
    oops 8 June 2016 07: 45
    +1
    Kudrin is a liberoid. Like all kinds of gontmakhera and sweet.
    Some six months ago, this shushera predicted a complete collapse of the Russian economy and a catastrophic collapse of the ruble !!!
    Goats ...
  • iouris
    iouris 8 June 2016 10: 21
    0
    The president orders. And who pays?
  • Cat man null
    Cat man null 8 June 2016 15: 51
    -1
    Quote: tomket
    I am very much surprised "There is no money, but you are holding on there." So it's tempting to ask how THAT can be in power?

    Quote: Vasilyev u
    For the sake of truth, I can still protect Medvedev.
    Well, he is not an orator, and he can’t figure out anything on the move, because of the speed of his thinking, he cannot be compared with Zhirinovsky. He blurted out the truth, but in words, the first that got into his head. Couldn't disguise the truth, `` correctly '' file

    A couple more (may not this word be called)... "I heard it somewhere, and immediately believed it" ... zadolbali, (censorship) fool

    Below - full video this conversation. Watch from 1.30 to the end carefully, (censorship !!)!

    - (pensioner) They promised to carry out indexation, where is this indexation?
    - (Medvedev) She is nowhere to be found. She was not accepted at all. There is simply no money. Find the money - do the indexing. You stay here, you all the best, good mood ...



    Kakbe meaning a little different, no?

    And stop already ducks, UkroSMYami launched, breed!

    "No money, but you hold on" is
  • dr. sem
    dr. sem 8 June 2016 18: 45
    0
    "Alexei Kudrin said that he and his colleagues are working on a program for Russia's economic development, commissioned by the president," the SGA, the IMF, and others. bastard oi ...
  • koralvit
    koralvit 9 June 2016 08: 50
    0
    Apparently the president decided it would be better to let the crap in sight than to secretly. You do not need to be an economist to understand the American egg-pot, this is a great way to ruin the production and the entire economy of Russia. And put her on the needle of external borrowing. So that all the profits created by manufacturing enterprises go abroad to the owners of enterprises. Then there will be no independent policy in Russia. This is the goal of Mr. Kudrin and his company.