Military Review

New version of the modernization of the Argentine tank TAM


In June 2015, the Ministry of Defense of Argentina, after lengthy delays and procrastination, nevertheless concluded an agreement with Israel on the modernization of a part (74 vehicles) of the main fleet tanks Argentinean army TAM (Tanque Argentino Mediano). An agreement worth $ 111 million provides for the delivery by Israel of Elbit Systems as the main contractor of the kits for the modernization of 74 Argentinean TAM tanks (now the Argentine army has 218 such tanks), and a joint venture with the participation of Elbit Systems is being created to transfer technologies.

Within the framework of the signed agreement, Elbit Systems together with Israeli enterprises Israel Military Industries (IMI) and Tadiran upgraded one TAM tank in Israel to the TAM 2IP variant, which was delivered to Argentina upon completion. During the 29 events in May, representatives of the Argentine army were informed about the start of full-scale tests of this prototype.

The TAM 2IP tank differs from the previous version of the TAM 2010С modernization (carried out under the auspices of the same Elbit Systems under the previous 2 agreement) by installing the characteristic Israeli modules of the additional multilayer booking made by IMI on the hull and tower of the tank, which made the TAM 2IP look like a smaller version of the Merkava tank. The weight of additional protection is not disclosed, but it is reported that extensive testing and should clarify the issue of the effect of the increased weight of the tank on its chassis.

The remaining elements of the modernization should be similar to the previously developed version of TAM 2C and suggest equipping the TAM tank supplied by Elbit Systems with a round-the-clock duplicated aiming system, a thermal driver, a tank information-control system, a new communication system, sensors for warning about laser irradiation, the introduction of the system Honeywell's fire control system; replacing the tower’s hydraulic drives and tools with electric ones; replacing the tool stabilizer; replacing fire system, as well as the installation of an auxiliary power unit. The fire control system will allow you to fire a cannon with Israeli IMI LAHAT guided missiles with a semi-active laser guidance system (although they are not planned to be purchased by Argentina yet). The composition of the ammunition will be introduced modern Israeli 105-mm sabot shells.

According to the 2015 agreement, the serial modernization works themselves will be carried out in Argentina on the technical basis of the 601 and 602 arsenal (technical) battalions (Batallón de Arsenales 601 y 602) of the 601 arsenal group (Agrupación de Arsenales 601) Argentina. -Syur-Mer (Buenos Aires province), created on the basis of the former TAMSE tank factory, where TAM tanks were produced in due time.

Recall that the Argentine TAM tank modernization program has a long history, which boils down to projects and conversations that were not realized due to lack of funds. After about two decades of projection, in December 2010, the Argentine Ministry of Defense finally signed the first intergovernmental agreement with Israel on involving Elbit Systems in the design and implementation of the TAM tank modernization project. Under the terms of this agreement, Elbit was supposed to modernize five TAM tanks as prototypes for testing on its own. Subsequent work was to be carried out in Argentina on the technical basis of the 601-th and 602-th arsenal battalions, where five more tanks were to be upgraded together with the Elbit, and then the serial modernization of the first batch of 108 machines was to begin. In total, it was planned to modernize in the future all 230 available at that time in the TAM army.

The first upgraded Elbit tank on the TAM 2C version was officially transferred to the Argentine army 26 on April 2013. However, further work was suspended by the Argentine side for financial reasons, and in August 2013, the Argentine government decided not to allocate funds for the implementation of the program, freezing it for an indefinite period, and returned to it only in 2015 in a modified version of the modernization and limited its plans to 74. by tanks.

The main reason for the fluctuations about the modernization of TAM remains its extremely high cost - from 2,5 to 3 million dollars per unit (including both Israeli supplies and the cost of work in Boulogne-sur-Mer), comparable to the cost of a possible acquisition on the world market much more powerful and efficient tanks. In addition, it was reported that during a survey of the TAM tank fleet, "problems with the quality of steel armor and problems with the fatigue strength of other materials" were found.

The TAM tank was developed by order of Argentina in 1970-ies by the German group Thyssen Henschel using the German BMP Marder as the base chassis. Production of tanks was carried out in Argentina on a specially created for this state-owned enterprise TAMSE (Tanque Argentino Mediano Sociedad Estado) from 1979 to 1995 in the number of 256 production units, of which currently in service with the Argentine army are 218 machines.

New version of the modernization of the Argentine tank TAM

Prototypes of modernized Argentine TAM tanks: left - TAM 2, right TAM 2IP (c) Argentine Army (via Jane's)

The prototype of the modernized Argentine tank TAM 2IP in the exhibition in honor of the Army Day of Argentina. Buenos Aires, 29.05.2016 (c)

The prototype of the modernized Argentine tank TAM 2IP in the exhibition in honor of the Army Day of Argentina. Buenos Aires, 29.05.2016 (c)
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Aaron Zawi
    Aaron Zawi 5 June 2016 06: 28
    The day before yesterday we were discussing this topic.
    1. carp
      carp 5 June 2016 08: 53
      A very good advertisement for the Israeli proposals for the modernization of tanks was made by the recent episode when the Turkish M-60 modernized in Israel withstood a direct hit from the Cornet
      1. Skubudu
        Skubudu 5 June 2016 21: 43
        the cornet has a tandem warhead, which easily passes DZ.
        In this case, most likely the missile worked abnormally, most likely the leading charge did not work. Turk was just lucky.
      2. just exp
        just exp 6 June 2016 15: 56
        why did you get what he endured? there was a hole in the photo from a cumulative jet.
        the fact that BC did not fight does not mean that there was no penetration.
        in Chechnya there were tanks replaced by 5 crews. there were penetrations and there were losses among the crew, and the tank was repaired and further into battle.
        although the hole from the jet is also not a fact that there was a break. but not the fact that it was not.
        and listen to the Turks. Duc they have and the helicopters themselves fall for those reasons. and by the way the Turks are right. hitting the "needle" caused technical problems, for example the tail fell off.
  2. svp67
    svp67 5 June 2016 07: 07
    But once this, if I may say so, "tank" was quite a decent BMP "Marder"

    It was good to compare it with our JV "Sprut"
  3. wanderer_032
    wanderer_032 5 June 2016 08: 00
    It was good to compare it with our JV "Sprut"

    In terms of protection with "Sprut-SD", this machine is incomparable. Because the Argentine car is designed to perform other tasks than the Sprut-SD.
  4. Volga Cossack
    Volga Cossack 5 June 2016 08: 30
    repeat ?????? Like the whole topic was discussed.
  5. Arktidianets
    Arktidianets 5 June 2016 11: 30
    The tank is worthless; in contrast to 340 Chilean Leopards 2A4, these wedges are a plywood parody of the tank and no modernization will give them combat qualities.
    APASUS 5 June 2016 14: 01
    But I’ve been wondering where the Polish super heroes squeezed the idea for their tank, now it’s clear ........
  7. Lens
    Lens 5 June 2016 17: 46
    THERE is a unique tank in itself. A variant of an inexpensive armored vehicle capable of performing specific tasks. Of course, it will seem ridiculous to monumental countries, but for local conflicts (and Argentina cannot take part in others a priori) what is needed.
  8. berezin1987
    berezin1987 5 June 2016 22: 17
    Tank full bullshit. Merges even t-54 / 55, not to mention more modern samples. The marder’s armor will not stand the line with modern 30 mm uranium core shells. This is more like a tank destroyer, but a tank destroyer has powerful tank guns with poor armor. I can’t even imagine how they can be used if it can be soaked from an automatic BMP gun
    1. Backfire
      Backfire 6 June 2016 05: 19
      I doubt that it can be soaked from a 30 mm gun. The tank was created to meet the requirements of cross-country ability and weight because in those places with roads it is not very good.
      1. berezin1987
        berezin1987 6 June 2016 20: 41
        You can fill up. The line of 30 mm shells from the 2-42 cannon during the tests caused cracks and chips in the armor of the 1 lepard tank. The tank is outdated, but still it was a full tank. It is unlikely that the Argentine is stronger than the German