Military Review

Europe in the ring of fronts

55
Europe in the ring of fronts



Russia’s re-introduction of G7 during the Hiroshima summit did not stutter. But much has been said about the sanctions. Their length, as was noted in the statement of the leaders of the leading industrial powers, directly depends on Moscow’s implementation of the Minsk agreements (although the Russian Federation is not a party to the conflict. - NVO) and respect for the sovereignty of Ukraine. In a detailed statement, the requirements for Russia look like this: stop supporting Donetsk with Lugansk and return “annexed Crimea” without preliminary conditions. And after Moscow, it was recommended that troops be withdrawn from the Russian-Ukrainian border, to cooperate with the President of Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko, and finally, to guarantee gas supplies.

It is already interesting why it is someone, even the leaders of successful states, dispose of where Russia will keep its troops, with whom it will be friends at a high level, and to whom it will be obligatory to supply its hydrocarbons. But even more interesting, what does Ukraine have to do with it?

Of course, it must be admitted that after the events of 2014, Moscow’s relations with the West acquired a special glow, but nothing fundamentally changed: and without Kiev’s Maidan, NATO moved rhythmically to the east, and the Americans placed elements of their strategic missile defense on our borders. This was allegedly done against Iran - such a fairy tale was invented at the beginning of the century by the “elder brother” from Washington for especially credulous European aborigines. Although even then, much earlier than it was voiced in Athens by Vladimir Putin, it was known: it is enough to load other missiles into universal containers - and the entire territory of the Russian Federation right up to the Urals is in the affected area.

So it’s not in Ukraine. Speaking to graduates of the Academy of West Point or even to the military (in Kuwait, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc.), Barack Obama has repeatedly said that the United States will remain the leaders in the world during the 21st century and will not tolerate competitors. As it is known, America has two competitors: China, whose economy confidently comes out on top in the world, and Russia, which has military potential, including nuclear, is able to give the United States more than an adequate answer. It is this circumstance that concerns the American establishment in the first place, that is why Russia is considered the enemy number 1 overseas, and China, which has not yet gained the necessary nuclear muscles, is left in reserve.

IF THE ENEMY DOES NOT GIVE UP


In the era of Mikhail Gorbachev, we ourselves organized a nuclear striptease. But since it wasn’t possible to bare out (they had accumulated a lot of weapons!), In the era of Boris Yeltsin, Russia was actively helped by the so-called partners. Only under the Nunn-Lugar strategic potential of Russia over 20 years without a single shot dropped: on 7610 nuclear warheads, 902 intercontinental ballistic missiles, 684 ballistic missiles for submarines (PL), 33 nuclear submarines, 498 silo launchers, 191 mobile launcher (PU) ground and 492 PU sea-based, 155 long-range strategic bombers, etc. According to the Gor-Chernomyrdin uranium agreement, the Russian Federation lost 90% of weapons-grade uranium reserves, and the Americans were very upset when Moscow refused to continue cooperation ...

But by this time other reserves were already involved. First, NATO, which for a whole decade has suffered from lack of demand, and was forced to prepare to repel abstract threats, is now a rigidly oriented anti-Russian military bloc. Secondly, the American missile defense system and their advanced units are moved directly to the borders of Russia. And so that these movements did not cause unnecessary questions in the European capitals, for which Russia managed to become a very attractive market for goods and services, a huge organizational work was carried out. It must be admitted: Americans are able to formulate tasks and to achieve their implementation by hook or by crook - as it will ...

Here, for example, as did a monster from Russia.

August events 2008 of the year. After a conversation with US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Mikhail Saakashvili, then President of Georgia, at his residence, orders his troops to invade South Ossetia. In response, he received such a blow that not only knights in tiger-skinned fled, but also American instructors, who taught them military matters, fled. However, thanks to the propaganda and agitation of anyone you ask in Europe, everyone is firmly convinced that this is Russia, under cover of night, attacked a small and freedom-loving Georgia. It is even simpler with Ukraine: the time has passed, and the Americans no longer hide the fact that the coup d'état took place with their support and participation, however, Moscow’s response steps are unequivocal and, without going into nuances, are viewed as a manifestation of aggression. Yes, that Ukraine! It turns out that in Syria, Russia is also to blame. According to Washington, if Moscow had not intervened in the events and would have allowed the militants of the "Islamic state" banned in the Russian Federation to take Damascus and cut everyone out, there would be no refugee flow to Europe.

But this is a foreign policy aspect. The program of demonization of Russia, of course, is internal. If earlier, starting from the time of the USSR, Russia was declared an undemocratic state, where the rights of the opposition, nationalities and various minorities are violated in every way, now the accusation of corruption, the symbolist of which has become Putin’s friend cellist Sergei Roldugin, has been added.

Who knows, maybe he somehow took advantage of his close relationship with the head of the Russian state, but he certainly didn’t receive such preferences as sponsors of the election campaign of Barack Obama. But they are silent about them, and Roldugin is the first cello among the world's corrupt officials ...

Well historical aspect. European inhabitants have almost no doubt that the United States defeated Nazi Germany and took Berlin in 1945, attaching its striped flag to the Reichstag. And today they are active - and not without success! - they accustom to the thought that it was Hitler and Stalin, acting at the same time, attacked Europe, and the Americans sailed from overseas and saved the progressive humanity of the Old World.

Since it’s fantastically difficult to give out frank nonsense for reality, once again I take off my hat to the American propaganda machine - it works flawlessly. And all thanks to proven frames.

SPIRITORS


In this capacity, usually the Americans themselves or, at worst, the British, who in the military structure of NATO, as a rule, occupy command posts. And here's what is remarkable: it seems that if there weren’t these naval commanders and generals from infantry and aviation, as well as "leather collars" (marines) with general stars, especially no one would have remembered Russia.

Take, say, a retired British General Richard Shirreff, who served from NATO 2011 to 2014 for the year served as deputy commander in chief. He wrote a book called “2017: War with Russia,” which states that Russia after Georgia, the Crimea, and Ukraine may invade the Baltic States under the pretext of protecting the Russian-speaking population, and since Moscow has an atomic weapon, nuclear war, the general believes, is unavoidable. And everything will happen, according to his forecasts, within the next year ...

What is left to the ordinary man in the street if an entire general comes to such conclusions, even if he is a retired one? It is clear that they are actively afraid of Russia. By the way, the current NATO generals are also actively involved in the propaganda campaign against Russia, but not everyone is so straightforward about the nuclear threat from us (the head of the State Duma Committee on International Affairs Alexei Pushkov called Shirreff just insane). The new commander in chief of the united NATO forces in Europe, US Army General Curtis Scaparrotti, who, apparently, is still friends with the head, did not replicate banal horror stories about Moscow’s nuclear baton, and echoing his president, said that the alliance should be ready to fight, faced with "resurgent Russia, which is positioning itself as a world power." According to him, this is the first threat along with terrorism and the migration crisis, which in principle does not threaten America.


Today, NATO conducts much more military exercises near the Russian borders than in the most intense years of the Cold War. Photos from the site www.nato.int

No less sincere was his predecessor at the NATO post, the famous General Philip Breedlove, who said that America had “embraced with the Russian bear” for too long, therefore Russia managed to strengthen, made big plans and supposedly sees the United States and NATO “as limiters of their aspirations” . Therefore, the US goal is to “punch holes” in the Russian defense lines, to make them more vulnerable, in order to “stop the further strengthening of Russia in the region”. His proposal: to increase the number of American forces on the European continent from 65 thousand people to 200 thousand, as it was at the height of the Cold War.

And also the American General Breedlove is very concerned about the activity of Russian submarines at the Faro-Icelandic line between Iceland and Great Britain. According to the general, Russian submarines are a significant threat. But there was a clarification for whom, although it is clear that for the USA, and the Americans would like to “brake” them on the beam of Europe. And in general, judging by the alignment of forces, America would not mind putting "high-handed Russia" in place, but it would be good if possible hostilities were somehow limited to the Old World ...

Perhaps the Commander of the National Armed Forces of Latvia Raymond, who voted in two hands at a meeting of the NATO Military Committee for deploying the Allied battalion in Poland and the Baltic States, does not realize what role was prepared for Europe - it didn’t finish peteushnik and military academies. Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite is hardly versed in military affairs, although her father served in the NKVD. But the head of the NATO Military Committee itself, Czech General Peter Pavel, as a military officer, must at least understand something. Or does he really believe that, as he stated, “NATO is and will remain the most powerful and successful military alliance in the world”?

Most likely the general is somewhat mistaken. If, for example, to believe Barack Obama and his predecessors, the US army and navy should be the most powerful military force in the world. America will not tolerate competitors in this area, even loyal ones. And what does NATO mean without the USA? And when did anything mean anything?

By the way, the Ministry of Defense of the USSR did not really count on the Warsaw Treaty, which was dissolved by Mikhail Gorbachev. It is clear that, due to ideological reasons, some pages of history were hushed up, nevertheless there is great hope that, for example, Hungary and Romania, who fought on the side of Hitler, will defend the gains of socialism until recently. Or, say, the Bulgarian brothers who walked in the form of the Wehrmacht, or the Poles, who have their own century-old account of Russia? .. Paradoxically, one could really rely only on East Germans if they really had to fight with NATO or the United States in Europe.

But on whom the US stakes in NATO, is not very clear. You can seriously rely on the Poles, who, with the help of the United States, are ready to do everything to prove that they are the best Slavs in the world, almost Anglo-Saxon. All the others are either not ready to increase military spending, in general, because of the crisis, or they are ready to commercially surrender their territory under the American military infrastructure. However, Americans never seriously counted on Europe as an old woman, and after the collapse of the Eastern bloc, NATO was retained not as a military unit, but as an instrument of influence on Russia in particular, and the world in general. Well, as a buffer zone, of course, which can be donated, if it really comes to the fighting.

AT GUNPOINT


When during a visit to Greece, Vladimir Putin was asked about the American anti-missile infrastructure in Romania, he answered clearly: now Romania will also be under the gun. There will be a missile defense system in Poland, and Poland will be on the fly. And on the other, in fact, counted in Bucharest and Warsaw? Perhaps the exceptional capabilities of American weapons? But the events in Syria showed that the devil is not so terrible as he is painted, that Russia’s weapons and military equipment are no worse, if not better in a number of parameters, and provide guaranteed defeat of any objects within reach.

For example, the Caliber will not fly from the Black Sea to Washington, but it’s quite even to the position of the American missile defense system in Romania (all the parameters of the complex have not yet been disclosed). And it is unlikely that people living around these objects are delighted with the prospect of becoming cannon fodder. And Europe itself is hardly delighted with such a prospect, if, as predicted by General Richard Shirreff, a nuclear war with Russia is inevitable, and it will flare up within a year. It would not have clicked ... And on the other hand, if everyone understands everything perfectly, why then Europe, as if in tow, blindly follows the USA?

With the Balts and other Young Europeans, for whom the EU has become a serious economic test, everything is clear, for them the Russian threat is a way of being. Well, what about European old-timers with their history, with their centuries-old culture? Why they can not do without overseas guide?

Everything is very simple. The epoch of Jacques Chirac and Helmut Kohl, who created the European Union, which in the first place was to become an economic competitor of the United States, passed. They were replaced - as argued not without American participation - other leaders came, not so ambitious and not so independent. And more than others, German Chancellor Angela Merkel disappointed the European community.

Its American dependence is so obvious and even caricatured that it is rumored that it is not without purpose. According to one version, Dr. Merkel has a crush on the USA since the 90s, after a vacation in California. On the other hand, Barack Obama has incriminating evidence against the German chancellor - as if during the years of East German youth she was an informant for the Stasi. There are also more exotic versions, and it is still difficult to explain why, after all, European leaders are increasingly not acting in the interests of their states. And not only in the military field, but also in the economy - for example, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), which the US imposes on Europe with the same pressure as sanctions against Russia and military confrontation with Moscow.

As a result, Europe literally out of the blue received, in military terms, threats from three directions. First, a possible nuclear retaliatory strike from Russia. Secondly, the migration tsunami, which was formed after America, with the involvement of NATO forces, has spread North Africa and the Middle East. Well, the third threat is the North Atlantic Alliance itself, because if there were no NATO or it would not be so active (at the suggestion of the USA), there would be no Russian nuclear missile threat, and there would be no flow of migrants either.

... The literary countryman of the current chairman of the NATO Military Committee, General Peter Pavel, according to Yaroslav Hasek, was once asked:

- What do you think, Svejk, the war will last for a long time?

“Fifteen years,” answered Schweik. - It's clear. After all, since the Thirty Years War has already taken place, now we are half smarter and divide thirty by two to fifteen.

Since in our version it is not clear how much to divide, to make forecasts, when this time the Cold War ends, there is no possibility. And will it end with such “thinkers” like General Shirreff? Anyway, not fast. One hope that power in the United States will soon change and more adequate leaders will come to the leadership, without explosive geopolitical illusions.
Author:
Originator:
http://nvo.ng.ru/realty/2016-06-03/1_fronty.html
55 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avvg
    avvg 5 June 2016 12: 26
    +8
    In my opinion, this time the war between the West and Russia will end, only by the complete defeat of the West and we have no other choice but to win this war.
    1. Major Yurik
      Major Yurik 5 June 2016 12: 43
      +3
      Go ahead with hysteria, hysteria is a consequence of fear and mental deviations. All this already happened, we dug trenches, bomb shelters, then the bunkers passed, but again it got it, it happens! Here's an awkward outhouse for the Yankvoin! fool
      1. cniza
        cniza 5 June 2016 18: 06
        +5
        We need to deal with our problems, we will live without them, but here is how they are without us.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. weksha50
      weksha50 5 June 2016 13: 02
      +1
      Quote: avvg
      In my opinion, this time the war between the West and Russia will end, only by the complete defeat of the West and we have no other choice,



      Hmm ... Most likely, the third world war will end with the mutual destruction of the United States, Europe and Russia ...

      China will peacefully wait for its world triumph, since there will be practically no rivals for its leadership in the remaining world ...
      1. sgazeev
        sgazeev 5 June 2016 17: 30
        +1
        [quote = weksha50] [quote = avvg] In my opinion, this time the war between the West and Russia will end, only a complete defeat of the West and we have no other choice, [/ quote]


        Hmm ... Most likely, the third world war will end with the mutual destruction of the United States, Europe and Russia ...

        China will peacefully wait for its world triumph, since there will be practically no rivals for its leadership in the remaining world ... [/ qu

        China will also receive cookies, mattresses will not leave them alone.
      2. larand
        larand 6 June 2016 07: 41
        0
        Quote: weksha50
        China will peacefully wait for its world triumph, since there will be practically no rivals for its leadership in the remaining world ...

        And before whom will China lead? In front of the Mozambique monkeys, they don’t need televisions and iPhones.
      3. GSH-18
        GSH-18 7 June 2016 16: 39
        0
        Quote: weksha50
        China will peacefully wait for its world triumph, since there will be practically no rivals for its leadership in the remaining world ...

        And calmly die out from powerful radioactive fallout lol
    3. iliitchitch
      iliitchitch 5 June 2016 13: 42
      +2
      Quote: avvg
      In my opinion, this time the war between the West and Russia will end, only by the complete defeat of the West and we have no other choice but to win this war.


      Why is it so tough, colleague? With whom then butt butt, with China? C'mon, these suction cups stuck to us so that it’s not to push. And the west - to the bucket, where is their place. Dot ru .
      1. CORNET
        CORNET 5 June 2016 15: 15
        +2
        - What do you think, Svejk, the war will last for a long time?

        Well, if you fit Russian tanks to the borders of Israel (from Syria with our crews)))), then not for long ...! I'm right ..! hi
        1. iliitchitch
          iliitchitch 6 June 2016 01: 28
          0
          Quote: CORNET
          Well, if you fit Russian tanks to the borders of Israel (from Syria with our crews)))), then not for long ...! I'm right ..!


          What kind of war at all? They, by the way, no longer know who to give up with their grimy hemorrhoids. Do we need IT? Crowds of these civilized, eat constantly wanting and roaming our streets? What flies and mosquitoes outside the window are few?
    4. Blondy
      Blondy 5 June 2016 19: 52
      0
      Yes, the main thing here for mattresses is not everyone’s mess, so that Europe with a bare backside on a leash is kept at the foot, and Russia, also preferably without pants, does not protrude anywhere due to the rocket fence. And God forbid - these nerdy sniff together.
      1. Blondy
        Blondy 5 June 2016 20: 20
        0
        Yes, the main thing here for mattresses is not everyone’s mess, so that Europe with a bare backside on a leash is kept at the foot, and Russia, also preferably without pants, does not protrude anywhere due to the rocket fence. And God forbid - these nerdy sniff together.

        Sorry, I will continue. In my opinion, the whole hitch has its own peculiarity: in this situation, the statelessness of Russia is determined not by external factors, but by internal brain economic impotence.
  2. Altona
    Altona 5 June 2016 12: 28
    +3
    In general, a poor European is invited to simultaneously dig a bunker for a war with Russia, and put up a tent for migrants on top, while at the same time shell out for the purchase of weapons.
    1. Lelek
      Lelek 5 June 2016 16: 52
      +2
      Quote: Altona
      Altona


      Well, why so? There are alternative offers of pragmatic Europeans:
      (cry)
      1. Lelek
        Lelek 5 June 2016 16: 56
        +2
        Quote: Lelek
        There are alternative offers of pragmatic Europeans:


        By the way, and not only Europeans (here hooked here ...):
        (cry)
    2. sgazeev
      sgazeev 5 June 2016 17: 33
      +1
      Quote: Altona
      In general, a poor European is invited to simultaneously dig a bunker for a war with Russia, and put up a tent for migrants on top, while at the same time shell out for the purchase of weapons.

      Not the enviable fate of the burger, after the sausages, a crust of moldy bread.
  3. aszzz888
    aszzz888 5 June 2016 12: 28
    +1
    requirements for Russia are as follows: stop supporting Donetsk with Lugansk and return the “annexed Crimea” without preconditions. And after Moscow, it was recommended that troops be withdrawn from the Russian-Ukrainian border, cooperate with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and, finally, guarantee gas supplies.

    And you would not go to hell! angry Chumogonov replicas, mediocrity from the geyropa, already got it! laughing
  4. Monos
    Monos 5 June 2016 12: 28
    +13
    Maybe I have too much pride, but these all limits of arrogance have crossed !!! Rude openly! Maybe it’s a hysteria, but most likely they provoke a conflict. They behave like baboons.
    1. Volzhanin
      Volzhanin 6 June 2016 08: 16
      0
      It’s also not clear to me why our rulers humbly tolerate spitting in the face, dents, and outright bullying by the Westerners!?! How long?
  5. Dr. Bormental
    Dr. Bormental 5 June 2016 12: 32
    +14
    Nothing new .. monsters are specially made of us in order to collapse Russia and write it down in the raw materials appendages of the West, which in fact was already under EBN. That we, that China are like bones in the throat of amers and their mongrels. Personally, I see only one way out of this situation - what is called "an awl in the wall" - to toughen foreign policy to the maximum with the introduction of additional sanctions to NATO countries. Not to play around and not call them "partners", but directly say that they are potential enemies, and bend their line by building up weapons (including nuclear). They need to be intimidated so that they are afraid to fart in our direction, as it was under the USSR. They do not understand the word "friendship" - for them either you are their colony, from which all the juices are drawn (as an example, Ukraine), or an enemy who must be strangled with sanctions, then carry out a color revolution and, again, turn into a slave.
    1. DMB_95
      DMB_95 5 June 2016 13: 18
      +4
      In the current situation, the Russian authorities must unequivocally make it clear to the whole world (and at least officially declare) that we will now be what our enemies portray us in their fantasies. And we no longer have "partners" - only obvious or hidden enemies, ie. - OBJECTIVES. And we are in constant readiness at any moment to be the first to deliver a nuclear strike where we see fit. And we do not care about any consequences.
  6. Vladimir61
    Vladimir61 5 June 2016 12: 33
    +1
    Since Europe is in the "ring", then it's time to give up!
  7. berezin1987
    berezin1987 5 June 2016 12: 33
    +6
    It is high time to understand that Europe and the USA were, are and will be the worst enemies of the Russians. No need to do anything with them, not even diplomatic relations. It’s better for me to look at them through the crosshairs of an aim than to lead meaningless discussions about peace and security. The Germans have not yet answered for the 27 of millions of dead Soviet citizens, but I really hope they will. And they will not rid themselves of the Muslims, but again of us. We must correct our mistakes and drown the enemy in the blood. Look at least at the NATO logo, doesn’t it remind you of anything?
    1. Dr. Bormental
      Dr. Bormental 5 June 2016 12: 44
      +3
      How does it say there? "The best view of the morning city is from the bomber's sight"? wink
      1. berezin1987
        berezin1987 5 June 2016 12: 48
        0
        Only now, the bomber does not need to fly over the city at all, it is enough to go to the launch line of the cr. Although if you want hardcore, you can reset the product more powerful type an602
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. energetics
      energetics 5 June 2016 13: 14
      +1
      The enemy is not divided into America, England, Europe - there are only children of evolution, with a mental retardation - the Anglo-Saxons. As they were savages, they remained them. Accustomed from time immemorial to solve everything with a cudgel, gleaned from the sciences two actions, the difference and the particular, so they still live.
      1. Anglorussian
        Anglorussian 5 June 2016 23: 06
        0
        Accustomed from time immemorial to solve everything with a club
        And how do everyone else solve their problems?
        there are only children of evolution, with a mental retardation - the Anglo-Saxons.
        Has a higher power created you personally? Evolution in your case definitely does not smell ...
    4. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 5 June 2016 13: 20
      +4
      Quote: berezin1987
      It is high time to understand that Europe and the USA were, are and will be the worst enemies of the Russians. No need to do anything with them, not even diplomatic relations. It’s better for me to look at them through the crosshairs of an aim than to lead meaningless discussions about peace and security. The Germans have not yet answered for the 27 of millions of dead Soviet citizens, but I really hope they will. And they will not rid themselves of the Muslims, but again of us. We must correct our mistakes and drown the enemy in the blood. Look at least at the NATO logo, doesn’t it remind you of anything?

      Reminds, crusade. True, instead of bullshit, the prize will be 1/6 of the planet’s land, inaccessible to hitherto enlightened conquistadors. Well let them come, wait, sir. (And this is not an invitation. To hell they are needed here. But alas, it’s not so easy, you won’t get away.)
      Well, I agree, they have to answer and they owe us. True, no one has presented them for 70 years, probably there is no time, business, chaos in their heads ... But what about clearing stupid heads? What to do? "To understand and forgive" Germany has just paid off its WW1 debts. Although they concentrated and the Jews were extinguished payments for WW2 earlier. Well, it’s probably time to say “Nord Stream 2” against past sins (well, what can we take from them, even a tuft of wool), or disassembly. Which will end at the High Court. This is not the level of The Hague, it is an order of magnitude higher.
      Sight is a good thing. I have never seen him, but my hands are stretching themselves (EXPLANATION didn’t play any electronic crap, and I won’t play. It’s boring). But at least one natural and fill up in the forest, and you can die peacefully. Sorry about the genes. I would like to get drunk with enemy blood. (to psychiatrists, pediatricians and others not to send, not to send, and also to lawyers, olbutsmen [I heard a beautiful word, local people ... or something ..., they shoved it through shorter.] Surely wrote with a mistake. Please understand and forgive. He was born in the forest, he prayed to hemp, but if a bastard pokes his head here, we ask for mercy.
  8. berezin1987
    berezin1987 5 June 2016 12: 40
    +1
    Europe has already made so many troubles in relations with Russia for 30 years that I have a desire to burn these scum from Reykjavik to Warsaw and from Oslo to Nicosia. In my opinion, they all deserve to die. And you don't need to accuse me of fascism, how many times the Europeans spat in the outstretched hand of friendship and what losses each time “partnership” with them cost. Maybe it's enough to make excuses and retreat, but is it worth presenting an ultimatum? Either they leave us alone and we will peacefully separate ourselves or they begin to die en masse under the fire of rocket forces.
    1. Anglorussian
      Anglorussian 5 June 2016 23: 08
      0
      they begin to die en masse under the fire of missile forces.
      And you?
  9. beer-youk
    beer-youk 5 June 2016 12: 49
    +2
    "And it is unlikely that the people living around these sites are thrilled with the prospect of becoming cannon fodder."

    And what is someone going to ask them ?!
  10. weksha50
    weksha50 5 June 2016 12: 59
    +2
    "And more than others, the European community was disappointed by German Chancellor Angela Merkel .... Her American dependence is so obvious and even caricatured"...

    And even absurd ...

    Literally in the last two days, she has been doing two completely opposite things ...

    On the one hand, it offers Russia to actively enter into economic cooperation with Europe ...
    And right there, just yesterday or the day before yesterday, Russia is included in the White Book as a threat to Germany No. 1 ...

    Frau Merkel, and how to understand this ??? To understand that the proposal for economic cooperation is an attempt to throw a noose around Russia ???

    And what about the Nord Stream-2 ???
    Bulgaria and Turkey have already given us a ride with South Stream, we have lost a lot of money there ...
    What, frau, are you also preparing for us such an option with the Nord Stream ???

    In general, we have no one to hope for, and this has long been clear ...
    And the loss of the Warsaw Pact is, cynically speaking, not the loss of allies, but the loss of buffer space, airbags, so to speak ...

    Nothing, we, with our spaces, will survive, at least someone ... But Europe - no ...
  11. Donlomakin
    Donlomakin 5 June 2016 13: 05
    +2
    "He who comes to us with a sword He will die from the sword" Alexander Nevsky.
  12. kg pv
    kg pv 5 June 2016 13: 14
    +1
    One hope is that power in the US will change soon and more adequate leaders will come to the leadership, without explosive geopolitical illusions. Who is this for example ???? recourse
    1. berezin1987
      berezin1987 5 June 2016 13: 37
      +1
      Nothing will change, these creatures always hold a dagger in their bosom. You can never trust them and negotiate too. Better to let the Cold War go on for centuries than peace as a colony. Over the past 30 years, the "partner" world losses are greater than losses in the Second World War. And they are more afraid of nuclear war than we are, so it is enough to have the means of guaranteed retaliation. Some mongrel stuck in to check for weakness - to turn it into a European Afghanistan without occupying the territory and to put more minefields on the border with the poor fellows.
  13. cap
    cap 5 June 2016 13: 15
    0
    The American General Breedlova is very worried about the activity of Russian submarines on the Faroe-Icelandic border between Iceland and Great Britain. According to the general, Russian submarines are a significant threat. But a clarification was made for whom exactly, although it is already clear that for the United States and the Americans would like to “brake” them on the beam of Europe. And in general, judging by the balance of power, America would not mind putting the "presumptuous Russia" in its place, but it would be nice if the possible military operations were somehow limited to the Old World ...

    And here is something, and with oil ... Mr. Bridlav!
    Reread the new Russian doctrine.
  14. kepmor
    kepmor 5 June 2016 13: 16
    +2
    With the states and Europe, everything is clear - the enemies, what else can I say.
    The more terrible thing is that there are no fewer enemies inside the country and they are many times more dangerous, because they are "at the helm."
    They own almost all of Russia's wealth - mineral resources, land, production and further on the list.
    How to deal with them? This is the main threat to the sovereignty of the Russian state.
  15. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 5 June 2016 13: 27
    +2
    "Europe in a ring of fronts". Convenient wording. Or is Russia surrounded? By the way, here is another view of this issue, and a Western view:
    Firstly, never since the end of World War II have there been so many military equipment and soldiers, not only near Russia, but also right on the border with it. Not surprisingly, the Germans refused to send soldiers to the Baltic states. We may have forgotten in the West, and the Russians remember that the armies of Nazi Germany invaded along this path and killed millions of people up to 27. Secondly, they could be close to the Russian border cruise missiles or ballistic missiles are deployed on ships in the Baltic Sea or elsewhere. This is the result of George W. Bush withdrawing from the 2002 Missile Defense Treaty of the Year, and the dire danger of cruise missiles is that they can strike in St. Petersburg in less than five minutes. Those with nuclear weapons may have the illusion that the so-called defensive missiles can neutralize Russian strategic nuclear missiles and thus eliminate mutual deterrence. So, there is speculation that NATO might win a nuclear war with Russia. The temptation to commit an attack can be great. But in the real world this is just an illusion. Russian weapons systems are much more modern than, for example, Iraqi ones. Thirdly, diplomatic relations between Russia and the West are below the freezing point. It is surprising that democratic President Obama could plunge Europe into such a dangerous position. Republican Ronald Reagan took steps to begin negotiations with Gorbachev on disarmament in the second half of the eighties. And Democrat John F. Kennedy was close to starting a nuclear war because the Soviet Union installed missiles in 1962 miles in Cuba in 90, and today Republican Donald Trump asks why the US is waging so many wars in the world and why the US has bad relations with By Russia. I want to emphasize that Trump’s question is acceptable to me, although I don’t support this person. Democrats are not good, and Republicans are evil, as the Scandinavians often think. Now we need to ask the following question: how did European countries allow themselves to be harnessed to the cart, which alone govern the United States with its global interests? The United States considers Russia and China as countries that, if they do not threaten the United States, then, in any case, seriously question the status of the United States as a hegemon in the world. If we start a major European war, then, in all likelihood, nuclear weapons will be used. And who will pay for all this? Will it be the Baltic states, Poland or Scandinavia? Everything becomes even more grotesque if you look at the rationale for such a situation. Russia is an aggressor, Putin is crazy, we read in newspapers and books and see in the programs that TV bombes us with, but what exactly justifies the risk that our entire physical existence is exposed to? Ukraine is a special case. During the elections in 2010 and 2012, the majority there voted for politicians who opposed this country's membership in NATO. Since the 1992 year, Crimea has been dissatisfied with the fact that it is part of Ukraine. Nothing indicates that Russia wants to attack the Baltic states. The Russians feel trapped.
    Jens Jørgen Nielsen
    http://tehnowar.ru/43515-bolshaya-voyna-v-evrope-vse-blizhe.html
  16. Strezhevchanin
    Strezhevchanin 5 June 2016 13: 45
    0
    Europe has only to start praying to God that bloody-totalitarian Russia disappears and its lands are populated by galloping LGBT communities, and then again set daish on them and so on ad infinitum.
  17. pvv113
    pvv113 5 June 2016 14: 04
    +1
    Russia's strategic potential over the past 20 years has fallen without a single shot: by 7610 nuclear warheads, 902 intercontinental ballistic missiles, 684 ballistic missiles for submarines, 33 nuclear submarines, 498 mine launchers, 191 land-based mobile launchers (launchers) and 492 Sea-based launchers, 155 long-range strategic bombers, etc.
  18. Alexandr2637
    Alexandr2637 5 June 2016 14: 25
    +1
    One hope is that power in the US will change soon and more adequate leaders will come to the leadership, without explosive geopolitical illusions.

    Over the ocean there are none.
  19. Zomanus
    Zomanus 5 June 2016 14: 40
    +1
    Well, what, for the first time or what? Vaughn, Germany clearly stated that we are a threat and adversaries for her.
    Now a little more and the whole West will be convinced that we are ready to come to them and eat everyone alive.
    And there, before the war, the lead was not far.
    And we need to silently forge our sword, not getting involved in provocative fights.
    And here’s how we’ll bend the sword if they give us time for it,
    then the cries of the West will subside by themselves.
    Well, now the West really hopes that Putin will leave after the election,
    and the receiver will be more accommodating.
    And nifiga you in this case will not do ... what the most worthless.
  20. CORNET
    CORNET 5 June 2016 15: 34
    0
    The main thing for us is to find the weak point of the West and hit ...! The main thing is that they do not play us against someone again earlier ..! And the "painful point" is Israel .... soldier Surrounding ....
  21. Ros 56
    Ros 56 5 June 2016 15: 45
    +2
    Due to the inadequate behavior of the European majority of the EU countries and their complete non-independence and dependence on the United States, not to conduct any sort of meaningful negotiations with them and use the US Embassy in the European countries as an interlocutor. All statements of representatives of the above countries should not be taken seriously and not directly respond to them. All responses should be addressed to these countries through the ambassadors of their hosts, the United States of America. hi
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 5 June 2016 23: 02
      0
      Sooner or later, you have to do it. European sovereignty is like morning fog and every year it becomes more and more inconspicuous! hi
  22. CORNET
    CORNET 5 June 2016 16: 01
    0
    Our migrants (beloved ..))) can be provided with visas and sent to Europe ... (and Ukrainians there too))))) But do not take back ....)))) But they are cunning because they will not go ... laughing (there is a freebie clogged with Africans.) then you need to follow carefully!
  23. 31rus2
    31rus2 5 June 2016 17: 35
    0
    Dear Americans, the same choice is not great either to sit down and talk, that is, to recognize Russia as an equal player, or to put pressure also through military operations, but there are no guarantees, then all efforts will be aimed at drawing Russia into military conflicts and to ruin from the inside, I don’t think that they are hoping the United States, even if Putin leaves, a more decisive and tough president does not appear, and Putin can elegantly raise a surprise
  24. Pitot
    Pitot 5 June 2016 17: 52
    +1
    It is impossible now, no matter how anyone relates to GDP, for OH to leave. Well, you can’t. True, he would have to tame his internal enemies before the atomic decay, and then we'll figure it out ... HE went all-in (Crimea). We need to support him. HIS, but not any diving of different caliber. Like the Minister of Education or the Minister of Transport .....
    1. kotvov
      kotvov 5 June 2016 18: 10
      +1
      , but not every dive of different caliber. Like the Minister of Education or the Minister of Transport ..... ,,
      only these? and what size is this ellipsis?
  25. mark_rod
    mark_rod 5 June 2016 18: 16
    0
    Quote: avvg
    In my opinion, this time the war between the West and Russia will end, only by the complete defeat of the West and we have no other choice but to win this war.

    More precisely, not the West, but mattresses! There will be no mattress, there will be no aggression in Europe!
  26. Aleksandr1959
    Aleksandr1959 5 June 2016 18: 19
    +1
    In the era of Mikhail Gorbachev, we ourselves arranged a nuclear striptease. But since it was not possible to completely bare (there were so many weapons!), So-called partners actively helped Russia in the era of Boris Yeltsin

    I recall these times. He served then in Akhtubinsk, and rockets were blown up by bundles in Cap Yar. Moreover, in 50-60 km the tremors were like during a small earthquake, and a decent hum was heard.
    And then the sheep died in the steppe. Obninsk NPO "Typhoon" conducted a study of these cases of mass deaths of sheep. .... The data is still locked.
    This total disarmament in the face of an arrogant enemy cannot be repeated again.
    Both in direct and in other senses. The mood of our liberalists became especially clear after Kudrin’s words about embedding into the Western system at least on the sidelines.
    The same disarmament in the face of the enemy.
  27. Lieutenant Izhe
    Lieutenant Izhe 5 June 2016 18: 20
    +3
    how many HATE comments on the site ... HORROR!
    They propose to "burn Europe -TOTALLY" because a handful of German politicians have included Russia in the "white book" ...
    Here it is - "the beastly grin of the Russian honey!" crying
    Than then ... OUR EuroPHOBIA are different from theirs - "RUSO-" ??
    Germans us - in "white", Saudis - "in green", Americans - in "gray-brown-crimson" ... well, "notes of an idiot" - "the office WRITES!"
    (Do not react SO ACCIDENTLY, colleagues)))
    It's just, as Marietta Shahinyan used to say ... "We NOW need not be afraid ... man with a gun"idiot politicians with feathers")
    This site is becoming an expanse for psychiatrists around the world ...
    1. Anglorussian
      Anglorussian 5 June 2016 23: 11
      +1
      This site is becoming an expanse for psychiatrists around the world ...
      Rather, a pirated copy of the censor ...
      1. PValery53
        PValery53 6 June 2016 00: 49
        0
        Of course, it is better to discuss issues at the Military District than to be a member of the theater of war. But if the pipe calls, you will have to remember our innate military skills.
    2. Camel
      Camel 6 June 2016 01: 24
      0
      how many HATE comments on the site ... HORROR!
      They propose to "burn Europe -TOTALLY" because a handful of German politicians have included Russia in the "white book" ...
      Here it is - "the beastly grin of the Russian honey!" crying


      Sorry, but what do you offer? Eternal Russian forgiveness? How to always repent for what you did not do? May not pay attention to the strengthening of hostile sentiments towards us personally? To let down the claims of the inferiority of OUR people and the unworthiness of OUR country?

      .E.R to them all !! All countries of the world should know - if necessary, Russia will destroy any state and the whole world! And the measure of necessity is determined ONLY by the President of the Russian Federation.
      1. Anglorussian
        Anglorussian 6 June 2016 01: 39
        +1
        if necessary, Russia will destroy any state and the whole world!
        That is how, as a result of the consequences of a nuclear war, even the Papuans in the mountains of New Guinea will die.
        determines ONLY by the President of the Russian Federation.
        It is good that he and the sidekicks have families in Europe, and money there. It will not unleash a war to destroy everyone and everything.
  28. samarin1969
    samarin1969 5 June 2016 18: 55
    +2
    "Stop supporting Donetsk and Luhansk and return the" annexed Crimea "without preconditions. And already, in pursuit of Moscow, it was recommended to withdraw its troops from the Russian-Ukrainian border, cooperate with Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and, finally, guarantee gas supplies."

    Several centuries ago, the Scots showed how to respond to such arrogant demands.
  29. wandlitz
    wandlitz 5 June 2016 19: 49
    +1
    One hope is that power in the US will change soon and more adequate leaders will come to the leadership, without explosive geopolitical illusions.
  30. masiya
    masiya 5 June 2016 21: 54
    0
    I just want to say with the words of this hohlyat bitch- .. "we will never be brothers .." and by and large the whole Europa didn’t give up to us ... their fears, we do not care much about their refugees and homosexuals , soon the whole geyrope will be fucked a hundred times each, otherwise their sexual need exceeds the mind ...