In Astana, foreign customers are interested in Russian ships with the “Caliber”

28
The United Shipbuilding Corporation will hold a series of talks with foreign partners, RIA News Post deputy director of USC Igor Ponomarev.

In Astana, foreign customers are interested in Russian ships with the “Caliber”


The corporation takes part in the military exhibition KADEX-2016, which opened today in Kazakhstan.

“A rocket ship created on the basis of the 21632 project’s Tornado IRC and armed with the Caliber-NK missile system is of the greatest interest among foreign customers. The corporation is also ready to discuss deliveries abroad of rocket boats of the 12300 "Scorpion" project, ”said Ponomarev.

In addition, the exhibition features the anti-mine ship of the 12701 Alexandrite project.

According to him, at KADEX-2016, representatives of the corporation "will hold talks with the command of the Naval Forces of Kazakhstan, the management of the Kazakhstan Engineering company and a number of other foreign delegations."

Help Agency: The “Caliber” family rocket was first introduced in 1997. Specifications weapons are still secret. According to open sources, the firing range of "Calibres" at sea targets is 375 kilometers, and at ground targets - 2600 kilometers. "
  • kapital.kz
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    2 June 2016 16: 50
    "The greatest interest among foreign customers is a missile ship, created on the basis of the Tornado MRK of project 21632 and armed with the Kalibr-NK missile system"

    Trade started. The "exhibition" in Syria is bearing fruit. Yesterday "Curtain" was sold to Algeria, today people are looking after RTOs with Caliber. The main thing is that you still cut the performance characteristics on export versions. wink
    1. +12
      2 June 2016 16: 59
      Quote: Grandson of Veteran
      Most importantly, TTX still cut on export versions. wink


      Otherwise, we are forbidden to export.
      1. cap
        0
        2 June 2016 17: 38
        Quote: cniza
        Quote: Grandson of Veteran
        Most importantly, TTX still cut on export versions. wink


        Otherwise, we are forbidden to export.


        "Maybe you and the keys to the apartment where the money is" laughing
        From this opera? drinks
      2. +2
        2 June 2016 17: 42
        and missiles with a range of more than 300 km are not only ours. in general, export is prohibited.
  2. +3
    2 June 2016 16: 51
    The greatest interest among foreign customers is a missile ship created on the basis of the Project 21632 Tornado MRK and armed with the Kalibr-NK missile system.

    At the same time, it is not reported where the "foreign customers" come from.
    1. +2
      2 June 2016 16: 52
      Quote: wanderer_032
      The greatest interest among foreign customers is a missile ship created on the basis of the Project 21632 Tornado MRK and armed with the Kalibr-NK missile system.

      Well, it's not for nothing that we "advertised" them when ISIS was ironing! laughing
  3. +2
    2 June 2016 16: 55
    And I think that "Caliber" should be held.
    Not everything that can bring currency to the budget. can sell.
    Where are the guarantees that the sold "Calibers" will not soon end up with our sworn "friends"?
    1. +4
      2 June 2016 17: 02
      they have long been sold to a number of countries (for example, India)
      1. +1
        2 June 2016 17: 20
        Quote: kote119
        they have long been sold to a number of countries (for example, India)

        With some changes to limit the flight range.
    2. +2
      2 June 2016 17: 32
      Quote: sever.56
      And I think that "Caliber" should be held.
      Not everything that can bring currency to the budget. can sell.
      Where are the guarantees that the sold "Calibers" will not soon end up with our sworn "friends"?

      Export "calibers" have range restrictions due to compliance with the Missile Technology Control Regime.

      Actually, the well-known misunderstandings with the range of "home" "calibers" occurred precisely because the range for export versions is indicated on all sites.
  4. +3
    2 June 2016 16: 58
    after Syria, Caliber-NK does not need PR .. customers themselves will catch up.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      2 June 2016 17: 55
      Quote: Atlant-1164
      after Syria, Caliber-NK does not need PR .. customers themselves will catch up.

      To paraphrase, "a good product does not need advertising."
  5. 0
    2 June 2016 16: 59
    Quote: wanderer_032
    The greatest interest among foreign customers is a missile ship created on the basis of the Project 21632 Tornado MRK and armed with the Kalibr-NK missile system.

    At the same time, it is not reported where the "foreign customers" come from.


    Read the article carefully

    According to him, at KADEX-2016, representatives of the corporation "will hold talks with the command of the Naval Forces of Kazakhstan, the management of the Kazakhstan Engineering company and a number of other foreign delegations."
    1. +2
      2 June 2016 17: 22
      "and a number of other foreign delegations."
  6. +7
    2 June 2016 17: 02
    Thanks to the administration for such attention to our exhibition!
    Ours already ... dozens of years have ordered these RTOs. They either want to build shipyards by signing a bunch of intentions from Korea to Europe inclusive, then a port, or something else; and meanwhile, our fleet is the weakest in the Caspian (some patrol boats). For the sake of decency, at least they bought something, boys need to be taught something on something serious. There is no talk of militarization of the Caspian, but something serious is necessary for our sailors - to go by the sea, learn to use modern weapons. hi
    1. 0
      2 June 2016 17: 34
      Quote: Kasym
      Thanks to the administration for such attention to our exhibition!
      Ours already ... dozens of years have ordered these RTOs. They either want to build shipyards by signing a bunch of intentions from Korea to Europe inclusive, then a port, or something else; and meanwhile, our fleet is the weakest in the Caspian (some patrol boats). For the sake of decency, at least they bought something, boys need to be taught something on something serious. There is no talk of militarization of the Caspian, but something serious is necessary for our sailors - to go by the sea, learn to use modern weapons. hi

      Baba-yga is against, and here's why. You can replenish your fleet with ships that are more serious than boats, and it will look quite decent in the Caspian water area. As for RTOs with "calibers", this is, frankly, as you already understand, a strategic thing. Today, the warhead is normal, and tomorrow ... And the Americans will drive their aircraft carriers around the world, not knowing where to stick them.
      Attendance at exhibitions, demonstration of opportunities ... Well, who are you going to drive from the Caspian Sea? If there is anything, I am sure, and a land version of the "caliber". "Caliber" is not for the Caspian, there was a demonstration in the Caspian.
      I remember the movie "Boomer", the hero: "You don't need such a car, brother. Take care of yourself."
    2. avt
      0
      2 June 2016 17: 38
      Quote: Kasym
      Ours already ... dozens of years have ordered these RTOs.

      And really
      Quote: Kasym
      ; Meanwhile, our fleet is the weakest in the Caspian

      request But here I do not understand
      The corporation is also ready to discuss the delivery of Project 12300 Scorpion missile boats abroad. "
      Marching turbines for this project, who will do it?
      1. +4
        2 June 2016 18: 20
        Mauritius. Yes that's just the joke. The authorities scratch turnips. On the one hand: there is a fleet with marines, the admiral is. But there are really no ships; there is no big shipyard either. Would be called Coast Guard Troops. laughing . On the other hand. Why are they needed, against whom to shoot rockets and fight? All neighbors are kind of friendly countries. So these memoranda and intentions are gathering dust (according to Buyan there will be two years already). They ordered a tanker from the neighbors (in the Russian Federation) (they even raised a plant), they learned to make boats to drive poachers. This is the dilemma for the authorities. Is it worth building a shipyard (if all neighbors have it) and buying something serious for the fleet? About twenty years will be soon, as everyone can’t decide.
        For me, if you have a fleet, then ships with trained crews should be. Experience and skills, as they say, cannot be drunk - you never know where the CSTO will call. And RTOs can be thrown into the Black Sea through channels. hi
        1. avt
          0
          2 June 2016 18: 41
          Quote: Kasym
          Why are they needed, against whom to shoot rockets and fight?

          Well, a couple of "Buyanov" with "Uranami" would not interfere with the love - the pocket does not pull the stock. Especially when there are 16 missiles in a salvo. The caliber is certainly redundant in the presence of an air wing, well, if you are going to jam someone in Syria ... laughing Ours then simply circled the agreement with the USA on the RSRD and the type was not placed on the ground.
          Quote: Kasym
          For me, if you have a fleet, then ships with trained crews should be

          Well, somehow, yes, and I about it.
  7. 0
    2 June 2016 17: 02
    Quote: cniza
    Quote: Grandson of Veteran
    Most importantly, TTX still cut on export versions. wink


    Otherwise, we are forbidden to export.


    We have a lot of things prohibited. All these prohibitions would be respected ...
  8. +2
    2 June 2016 17: 14
    Kazakhs do not seem to be enemies. Why not.
    Although the Russian-speaking crowded from there. Astana is a city in the desert. I didn’t see anything good there.
  9. 0
    2 June 2016 17: 36
    It is possible and necessary to sell solvents - of course, all armaments with reduced performance characteristics - as was the case under the Union ........ but not in vain and not in debt ..... this is also supported by the enterprise-developers. and participation in real hostilities and effective use - is this not the best advertisement for the products of our military-industrial complex.
  10. 0
    2 June 2016 18: 14
    in my military service in 81, the receivers were R-154. years to them as I was and the nameplate hung on them .. Secretly .. Now they have just released the Internet replete with pictures. What is valuable for the country needs to be protected from prying eyes. and the enemy will be in suspense from a lack of information.
  11. 0
    2 June 2016 21: 36
    Until the Caspian began to "silt" democratizing gifts disguised as friendship from Turkmenbashi, it is necessary to fill it with robotic sailing catamarans (RPBK) of various purposes: from meteorological stations-life rafts and boom-stoppers from oil spills, ending with missile carriers (including Caliber), embodying the most effective tactics of distributed weapons - "one carrier - one rocket". But naturally, there should be a combat ship (MRK) nearby, which will" graze "this flock of RPBKs of 200-300 pieces (even 500 - with" civilian "- meteorologists, booms, etc.) and give a command for a salvo of missiles, because 8 of their calibers, even for barmaley - such a trifle! And the massiveness of the RPBK and their constant mixing (twisting and twisting - I want to confuse) increase the camouflage of their most "combat" versions, including the snorkel of the robotic diesel-electric submarine arsenal of missiles made under the catamaran skeleton, then the combat stability and the strength of the missile salvo of this compound multiplies, and, with minimal costs, without the construction of aircraft carriers, destroyers and other single targets for RCC enemy! At the same time, part of the RPBC will be electronic warfare systems for RTOs, so that in the event of a missile strike on it, take part of the missiles (and torpedoes) onto themselves, inflating metallized bags and emitting noise and em radiation close to the RTOs. And you can reinforce that armada with underwater gliders and UAVs with synergetic interspecific support of troops. In general, we should not sell rockets, but TACTICS!
  12. -2
    3 June 2016 00: 55
    Quote: Barracuda
    Kazakhs do not seem to be enemies. Why not.
    Although the Russian-speaking crowded from there. Astana is a city in the desert. I didn’t see anything good there.


    Like the enemies .. hah! My father was born in 48! And he grew up in kazakhstan .. so back in the school years "wonderful" were already called the occupiers and fights were on this basis! He told me how it was a zap to sit with these ... "you sit with this .. a Kazakh woman, and her lice are crawling along her braids, and then she carries it like a donkey" (c) I quote! While the USSR was still keeping these saxauls in check .... and not only this way .. but as they sensed the will, they immediately stood on four hooves! And in Alma-Ata they set up a nomadic camp! And those only in Kazakhstan (with a small letter, if that) Nikhren, all these chebureks are not our friends! They left everything that they built, shit all that they left and that's it .. we have "friends" .. they are trying to download the right!
    1. +1
      3 June 2016 06: 05
      But since 48 years a lot of time has passed, come see, everything is already wrong! And people are different, and the country is different.
      1. 0
        3 June 2016 18: 27
        Quote: faser
        come see, it's not like that already!


        No disagree

        let him not come. From such far necessary. And talking to such a useless
    2. 0
      5 June 2016 13: 09
      I went to the Orenburg region as a child to visit, so I saw lousy Russian children, I saw how Russians eat sauerkraut, stinky herring and capelin every day, I was sick, from flies, pigs climbing around the house, dirty floors, constant snot in children flowing from my nose ....
      Forever drunk adults! The horror is just what kind of dirty people .... fu!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"