Military Review

Washington has not yet decided how to react to the delivery of C-300 to Iran

53
In Washington, they have not yet decided what additional restrictions (sanctions or other measures) will be with respect to the Russian Federation in connection with the supply of C-300 complexes to Iran, reports RIA News statement by State Department representative John Kirby.




“We have not yet decided whether the delivery of the C-300 will lead to action by the US authorities,” Kirby told reporters.

He recommended that media representatives on this issue contact the Ministry of Finance, which is directly involved in sanctions. According to him, there they should know "when such a decision can be made - after the completion of deliveries or else in time."

Usually, the US authorities do not announce in advance who the sanctions are preparing against and in what amount.

Earlier, commenting on the delivery of the first batch of Russian complexes to Iran, State Department spokesman Elizabeth Trudeau said: "We are against these supplies, but they do not violate the nuclear deal with Tehran or the existing sanctions."
Photos used:
http://www.rosinform.ru
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Vend
    Vend 2 June 2016 10: 33
    +24
    This is not their business at all. Now Iran will be protected from the unexpected export of democracy from the United States.
    1. vovanpain
      vovanpain 2 June 2016 10: 37
      +25
      Washington has not yet decided what additional restrictions (sanctions or other measures) will apply to the Russian Federation in connection with the delivery of S-300 systems to Iran,

      What’s the solution? Get handkerchiefs, wipe the nozzles, grab a beer, pinch a gay friend's ass, cry, go to a bar or play golf, baseball ..... options are sea for mattresses what should we do and what should we do without striped we will understand. yes
      1. cniza
        cniza 2 June 2016 11: 01
        +5
        The United States is sticking its nose everywhere, it's time to pinch it ... "The European Union and Japan have rebelled against the actions of the United States in the WTO" - maybe they will see the light.
      2. Dryuya2
        Dryuya2 2 June 2016 11: 10
        +3
        Quote: vovanpain
        pinch ass gay boyfriend

        yes
        http://ria.ru/science/20160601/1441628369.html
        Scientists: the number of gays in the US has doubled over the past 25 years
        June 1 - RIA Novosti. The number of people who tried to engage in same-sex relationships has doubled in the United States, and the number of pro-marriage supporters has increased almost five-fold, scientists say in an article in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior.
        ====
        completely here
        http://ria.ru/science/20160601/1441628369.html
        1. jetfors_84
          jetfors_84 2 June 2016 11: 55
          +2
          What have they got there? Is the ___ process in progress? Looks like
        2. sergo42
          sergo42 2 June 2016 21: 32
          0
          What country - such citizens!
      3. DMB_95
        DMB_95 2 June 2016 11: 15
        +4
        "Washington has not yet decided how to react to the delivery of S-300 to Iran" Do not enter the affected area, and / dots ..
      4. megafair
        megafair 2 June 2016 13: 07
        +1
        Quote: vovanpain
        pinch ass gay boyfriend

        And they can not only "pinch" they can and like this:
        It turned out that in the barracks of all military bases without exception, sexual abuse of recruits is commonplace. Moreover, this applies not only to women’s military personnel, but equally to men’s soldiers.


        The cases of sexual violence mentioned in it amount to tens of thousands, and these are just the data that were found, in fact the scope of the problem is much larger, since many victims hide the facts of rape


        Totally here:
      5. GSH-18
        GSH-18 3 June 2016 21: 56
        0
        State Department spokeswoman Elizabeth Trudeau said: “We are against these supplies, but they are not a violation of the nuclear deal with Tehran or existing sanctions”

        Well, that's good, that's okay bully
    2. RUS96
      RUS96 2 June 2016 10: 39
      +6
      Off topic a little
      The media reported on the capture by the Syrian army of one of the main executioners of the IS named Bulldozer.
      https://russian.rt.com/article/305683-smi-siriiskaya-armiya-vzyala-v-plen-odnogo
    3. RUSOIVAN
      RUSOIVAN 2 June 2016 10: 53
      +7
      At first I was interested in their opinion, then funny, then funny. And now everything: DECLINED. Spit from the high bell tower!
      1. CORNET
        CORNET 2 June 2016 11: 47
        +1
        Quote: RUSOIVAN
        At first I was interested in their opinion, then funny, then funny. And now everything: DECLINED. Spit from the high bell tower!

        There S-400, etc. already on the way ... We will close the skies of Syria and Iran completely! We have vast experience in layered air defense ... The most important thing is not to betray .. (well, the payment should be appropriate ..)
        1. quote
          quote 2 June 2016 12: 20
          0
          Quote: CORNET
          .The most important thing is not to betray .. (well, the payment should be appropriate ..)

          - Yesterday Nadya came (common name)! If I pay as today, I will come tomorrow too!
          So, for reflection.
          Write and think, think and write !!!!!
    4. VNP1958PVN
      VNP1958PVN 2 June 2016 11: 03
      0
      How is it not their mind?
      The US administration allowed the introduction of new sanctions against Russia. They are related to the supply of S-300 anti-aircraft missile systems to Iran, said Sam Werberg, spokesman for the Iranian department of the US Department of State, said.
      request
    5. Blondy
      Blondy 2 June 2016 11: 41
      0
      Washington has not yet decided how to react to the delivery of C-300 to Iran
      Yes, whatever you like - caravans go without paying attention to the dog bullshit (I’m not that mattresses are ravenous dogs, but the algorithm of behavior of the parties to the deal).
  2. Bureaucrat
    Bureaucrat 2 June 2016 10: 34
    +7
    All the same, they would have found the reason. In short, with them a bottle for the occasion!
    1. Alexei
      Alexei 2 June 2016 12: 44
      0
      Our Israeli colleagues will be delighted.
  3. V.ic
    V.ic 2 June 2016 10: 35
    +2
    We haven’t made a decision yet ... Kirby told reporters

    Make the right decision: shut up!
    1. Mavrikiy
      Mavrikiy 2 June 2016 10: 44
      +2
      Quote: V.ic
      We haven’t made a decision yet ... Kirby told reporters

      Make the right decision: shut up!

      They cannot, sir.
      They were nervous. The whole world was in his pocket, and put his hand - a hole in the hole. Do you want them to be silent in a rag? Guard, stole!
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. arane
    arane 2 June 2016 10: 36
    +4
    Yes do not care ..... God forbid, the sanctions will be lifted
    Our "elites" will immediately begin to resell imported goods and pump oil and gas. Why work, create, build something, produce
    In PM, everything is fine
  5. SmacXnumx
    SmacXnumx 2 June 2016 10: 37
    +1
    Does the USA know another word besides sanction?
    1. DMB_95
      DMB_95 2 June 2016 11: 06
      +1
      Quote: Smac111
      Does the USA know another word besides sanction?

      If they fly to Iran, they will learn and learn: S-300. True, those who survive will not be able to pronounce without stuttering.
    2. unsinkable
      unsinkable 2 June 2016 15: 29
      0
      Quote: Smac111
      Does the USA know another word besides sanction?

      It is not so rare, and maybe even often, that they are CAREFUL, which means the correctness of Russia's actions. hi
  6. Funnels
    Funnels 2 June 2016 10: 37
    +5
    As in the anecdote “smart left, beautiful right, but what, should I be torn apart?” An eternally preoccupied nation would be defined. And we would be calmer. although what new can they say?
  7. ALABAY45
    ALABAY45 2 June 2016 10: 38
    +3
    “We are against these supplies, but they are not a violation of the nuclear deal with Tehran or the existing sanctions”
    I have always believed that France is a prostitution "power", but that the United States ... belay Although times are changing ...!
    1. alstr
      alstr 2 June 2016 12: 22
      0
      Quote: ALABAY45
      “We are against these supplies, but they are not a violation of the nuclear deal with Tehran or the existing sanctions”

      And if they do not violate anything (they themselves admitted it), then on what basis will they impose sanctions.
      Apparently on the basis of Krylov's fable: "You are only to blame for the fact that I want to eat."
  8. Skif83
    Skif83 2 June 2016 10: 38
    +2
    Iran, like Syria, should be in the zone of our influence in the Middle East. Therefore, let the US State Department chatter, the number needs to be done!
    The talk time has passed.
  9. soroKING
    soroKING 2 June 2016 10: 40
    +1
    Haha ... they are all around
    they push the missile defense system, and we are fulfilling the old contract because of the Bear suspended hi
  10. iliya87
    iliya87 2 June 2016 10: 41
    +1
    I won’t be surprised if the Turkish F-16 Iranians knocked down, you need to check the system))
  11. AKsvlad047
    AKsvlad047 2 June 2016 10: 41
    +2
    Your - "against", can you put it in the place where you love each other !!!!!
  12. GeorgeSev85
    GeorgeSev85 2 June 2016 10: 42
    +1
    "how to react to the delivery of S-300 to Iran" Can I tell you how .... Sniff into a rag.
  13. Wedmak
    Wedmak 2 June 2016 10: 42
    +1
    Apparently the decision is to just sit upright and not talk, not about them.
  14. prabiz
    prabiz 2 June 2016 10: 43
    +1
    What solution? Run from the region !!!!!!
  15. Berkut24
    Berkut24 2 June 2016 10: 44
    +1
    Where is Washington and where is Iran ... There is no need to react. Humble yourself. They did not wait for you and did not ask you. Build democracy in Mexico.
  16. Zaurbek
    Zaurbek 2 June 2016 10: 44
    +2
    No way, this is not a new technique; you will have to redo the attack plans on Iran, taking into account the location of the S-300. To do this, you need to scout when they take up combat duty. Air defense systems without AWACS systems will only complicate the air operation against Iran. But the supply of AWACS systems and modern fighter jets with AFAR, the United States and Israel will, as they can resist. Since the creation of a continuous radar coverage will raise the level of losses during the attack, to unacceptable.
    But, in addition to Russia, there is China which has the production technology of AWACS and AFAR systems
    1. 31rus2
      31rus2 2 June 2016 10: 54
      +2
      Dear, besides the S-300, the issue of deliveries of the Su-30 and other military equipment is considered (there may be a lot, including reb), it is good that the Iranian leadership understands that the S-300 is only a part requiring rearmament. we will look at the position of the United States in Syria (the region), otherwise Iran may have something modern
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Zaurbek
        Zaurbek 2 June 2016 11: 22
        0
        It is then considered, but if pressed, then we will not deliver. And China will deliver ....
  17. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 2 June 2016 10: 47
    +1
    Washington has not yet decided how to react to the delivery of C-300 to Iran
    So we can tell you how to respond-SILENT and CARE.
  18. Sergey-72
    Sergey-72 2 June 2016 10: 50
    +1
    In any case, sanctions continue to shine, and a couple of downed S-300 planes will cool some hotheads. The complex should have been installed a long time ago, you see, there would be less ugliness and the toggle switch "" would be turned off more often.
  19. VNP1958PVN
    VNP1958PVN 2 June 2016 10: 51
    +1
    Washington has not yet decided how to react to the delivery of C-300 to Iran
    Just add a plastic bag to NAZ pilots and remove all unnecessary. request
  20. Denis DV
    Denis DV 2 June 2016 10: 52
    +8
    They have political spawning; they have no time for Iran laughing
  21. weksha50
    weksha50 2 June 2016 10: 58
    +1
    Honestly, for several years now I have not been able to understand the "concern" of the United States with the supply of our S-300, which are not offensive, but purely defensive weapons ...

    This once again convinces us that the United States has its own, mercantile and bloodthirsty plans for Iran ...
  22. mamont5
    mamont5 2 June 2016 11: 14
    0
    "Commenting on the delivery of the first batch of Russian complexes to Iran, State Department spokesman Elizabeth Trudeau said:" We are against these supplies, but they are not a violation of the nuclear deal with Tehran or the current sanctions. "

    Still, GDP is not Medvedev for you, who bowed to the West, including and canceling the supply of C-300 to Iran.
  23. sergey2017
    sergey2017 2 June 2016 11: 14
    0
    Quote: Denis DV
    They have political spawning; they have no time for Iran laughing

    That's right in the suction of his native pi ... ka! How they lifted up their homosexual connections!
  24. newterra
    newterra 2 June 2016 11: 22
    +1
    Breaking into barracks, villages, camps, Russian barbarians left cities, libraries, universities and theaters ...
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Zaurbek
      Zaurbek 2 June 2016 12: 01
      -1
      You are right, I will add only:
      ... they cut out Aboriginal people in villages, settled them with Russians, Armenians and then built ...
  25. demo
    demo 2 June 2016 11: 26
    0
    “We have not yet decided whether the delivery of the C-300 will lead to action by the US authorities,” Kirby told reporters.

    This noise-headed let him suggest just trying to fly there a couple of F16.
    Immediately determined.
  26. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 2 June 2016 11: 29
    0
    Quote: weksha50
    This once again convinces us that the United States has its own, mercantile and bloodthirsty plans for Iran ...

    In my opinion, they never concealed these plans, and not only regarding Iran ...
  27. Algetxnumx
    Algetxnumx 2 June 2016 11: 31
    0
    How to react? Yes, damn a lot of options: Kill a bad little head against the wall; Shiganot from the highest skyscraper shouting "Russians are coming"; To eat cyanidic, sooo speak from uncertainty helps; Here it is, on the spot, and if there are still uncertainties, we will also show you how to overcome them.
  28. mole
    mole 2 June 2016 11: 58
    0
    Some kind of daisy !? belay He loves, dislikes, decide - not decide! lol
    Her mine, like - girls of easy virtue! wink
  29. Wolka
    Wolka 2 June 2016 12: 14
    0
    now the Yankees will no longer be able to control the Middle East, the range of the S-300 reliably covers all their attempts, the main thing is that these complexes should be in sufficient quantity with machines for their cover (with Shells)
  30. Egor-dis
    Egor-dis 2 June 2016 18: 57
    0
    Something I lagged behind life. It seemed like there was a conversation that they would supply S-400 to Iran as compensation for freezing S-300 supplies when Iran was under sanctions. Replayed again on the S-300?
  31. Ros 56
    Ros 56 3 June 2016 16: 15
    0
    To start, try to attack, and then how to roll.