Military Review

Democratic Pyongyang against totalitarian Seoul

78
Association is possible only on the basis of the idea of ​​Kim Il Sung.


The situation on the Korean Peninsula has a clear tendency to exacerbation. At the same time, both Pyongyang and Seoul set the unification of the country, which was artificially divided in 1945, as the most important task of its policy.

“There is a conspiracy of Washington and Beijing to overthrow the regime in Pyongyang through its economic collapse”
Why 71 a year ago, Moscow went to the division of Korea, although it could easily take it entirely, is not entirely clear. It would be more logical to dismember Japan (following the example of Germany). Why did nobody divide China, Burma, the Philippines and other territories liberated from the Japanese? Why is Korea so unlucky? As a result, we have a divided nation, the two halves of which, on the one hand, look at each other as mortal enemies, on the other, they dream of unification.

The state of the armed forces of two Korean states is known (“MIC”, №№ 18 – 19, 2016). From a military point of view, they are in a state of strategic stalemate - neither side can capture the other.

The entire responsibility for permanent tension on the Korean Peninsula is taken to be placed on Pyongyang, in this regard there is in fact a worldwide consensus, which is embodied in regular resolutions of the UN Security Council with regular portions of sanctions against the DPRK. There is a feeling that this policy is completely counterproductive.

Triple standards

Regarding the endless sanctions in response to the implementation of the North Korean nuclear missile program, Pyongyang rightly points to double standards in the position of the world community. For example, 30 January 2013, the Republic of Korea repeated the success of the northerners, going into space with a satellite launched with the help of the KSLV rocket (the first stage was made in Russia). For some reason, no one thought to impose sanctions against Seoul, or even just to condemn him. What is right - every country has the right to space launches. But it is each, regardless of whether it is southern or northern. Yes, the production technology of launch vehicles and intercontinental ballistic are closely related (although not identical). But double standards should not be.

The same applies to the possession of nuclear weapons. It’s impossible to keep secret the 70 technology. However, for some reason, only five countries (permanent members of the Security Council) were allowed to have it. This is a double standard. But then it became even worse: it turned out that the principle “who dared, he ate” can be successfully implemented. This was done (except for the voluntarily disarmed South Africa) Israel, India and Pakistan. And they had absolutely nothing for it. On the contrary, their international status and, what is extremely important, military security have increased. The possibility of aggression against any of them has dropped to almost zero. Why is the DPRK not entitled to replenish this company? Already it turns out not double, but a triple standard. Even if we drag by the ears of the argument that Israel and India are democratic countries, no one will dare deny the mortal danger to all mankind of the nuclear-missile arsenal of Pakistan. But for some reason no one is stifling Islamabad with sanctions, on the contrary, he is being courted in every possible way, giving a lot of money and weapons. At the same time, all of these “new” nuclear countries are developing missile programs (in particular, New Delhi is building an ICBM with a nuclear warhead), Israel and India are launching satellites, but no one is introducing sanctions against them or even does not require it.

A statement from the DPRK Foreign Ministry on February 12 of 2013 says: “In stories The UN, which is more than 60 years old, has carried out more than two thousand nuclear tests and nine thousand satellite launches around the world, but UN Security Council resolutions banning nuclear tests or space launches have never been adopted. ” There is nothing to argue. Unfair punishment is caused not by the desire to improve, but by bitterness, which actually happens.

The North Korean "Juche" ("self-reliance") and the "Songun" ("army priority") were turned into a caricature by the efforts of Western and South Korean propaganda, which to a certain extent is due to the very peculiar style of presentation of these ideas by the North Koreans themselves. Meanwhile, if the concepts are freed from the communist ideology (which is actually very easy), then they are completely normal and absolutely justified: if a country wants to pursue a sovereign domestic and foreign policy, it is impossible to manage without Juche and Songun. Much of humanity has forgotten about this, deciding to give up independence. This is their choice, but no one can deny the DPRK the right to its own way.

The feeling that the country is being punished for this choice is growing ever stronger: small to be independent. For domestic policy of Pyongyang, no one is going to punish. Moreover, in order not to fall into the next double standard, for violation of the rights of its own citizens it is necessary to punish, for example, all the monarchies of the Persian Gulf, first of all, super-totalitarian Saudi Arabia. Sanctions should be imposed against them, in particular, to forbid them to sell oil and gas, to buy weapons and luxury items. But for some reason nobody offers this.

Big mistakes


Pyongyang’s independence becomes categorically unacceptable not only for Washington (no comment is needed here), but also for Beijing, to whom North Korea is interesting only as a buffer and dumb puppet. Therefore, over the past years, relations between China and the DPRK are rapidly deteriorating. Beijing almost openly forms on its territory "alternative" authorities and the army of North Korea from defectors from this country. In fact, there is now a collusion between Washington and Beijing to overthrow the regime in Pyongyang through its economic collapse. Therefore, the draft last resolution of the UN Security Council with a sharp tightening of sanctions against the DPRK (adopted on March 2), they developed together. At the same time, both Washington and Beijing hope after this to put North Korea under their complete control. That is, after the overthrow of Kim Jong-un, the interests of the United States and the People's Republic of China will become opposite, but until that moment they coincide.

Democratic Pyongyang against totalitarian SeoulRussia is categorically not interested in such a development of events, but she was not ready to single-handedly veto the UN Security Council resolution on sanctions against the DPRK (although it tried to delay its adoption). Perhaps this is the biggest foreign policy mistake of Moscow in recent years. It was doubly unacceptable to vote for this resolution because Russia itself is under illegal sanctions. And constantly says that they are generally counterproductive. With regard to the Korean problem, this is completely true, but for some reason in this case we forget about our own statements.

However, Seoul is making a much bigger mistake than Moscow.

It is necessary to once again recall the unique specificity of the inter-Korean conflict - irreconcilable enemies set unification as the main political goal. And this requires from both sides approaches that are fundamentally different from the behavior of participants in other conflicts. For example, Armenia and Azerbaijan were part of the same country for a very long time, but in the future they are not going to unite. Therefore, the cultivation of mutual hatred by them, although not very useful, is not at all disastrous. But Pyongyang and Seoul can not behave this way. Forcing hate moves them away from the main goal.

Of course, the militant rhetoric of Pyongyang - up to the announcement of a preventive nuclear strike - is completely unacceptable. The DPRK leadership must declare that under no circumstances will it be the first to use not only nuclear but also conventional weapons, and all its military power is created solely for self-defense. But it is also necessary to understand that Pyongyang is seriously afraid of American aggression, especially since there are some very recent examples before it. It can be said that the DPRK's nuclear program was born in Serbia and Iraq. North Korea has the right not to want to share the fate of these countries.

Juche's future

Almost no one outside the Korean Peninsula knows that as far back as 70, under Kim Il Sung, the totalitarian DPRK proposed a completely democratic principle of uniting the country - on a confederal basis, preserving in both parts of the political and economic systems and with annual rotation of top management . Of course, this path is very complicated, but there is simply no other option. And so far Pyongyang has not refused it. At the last TPK congress in May, Kim Jong-un again said that the DPRK is striving for peaceful unification of Korea while preserving in each of the parts of the current systems and only if aggression is committed against the country, does Pyongyang implement the military option of unification. Interestingly, absolutely all world media quoted the second part of this statement, but the overwhelming majority "did not notice" the first.

Alas, but the Democratic Republic of Korea still wants a purely totalitarian version of integration - a complete takeover of the DPRK, and in a much more rigid variant than with the unification of Germany, with repression against the entire military-political leadership of the North. This approach, of course, makes unification impossible. The trouble is that Seoul is not playing its own game.

Perhaps, in the XX – XXI centuries, there is no more impressive “success story” in the world than that demonstrated by South Korea. She spent the first half of the twentieth century in the role of a powerless impoverished Japanese colony, and in 1950 – 1951 she was completely destroyed during the war. The standard of living here in 60 was the same as in the countries of tropical Africa. Now the South Korean economy is among the largest 15 in the world, according to nominal GDP in 2015, it seems to have bypassed Russia. And at the heart of success are not financial soap bubbles and not the service sector, as in the West, but the most powerful modern high-tech industry, which makes the country much more resistant to various crises. In addition, beautiful sun. In terms of combat potential and the level of training of personnel, they are at least among the three strongest in the world among non-nuclear-weapon countries. The South Korean army is two heads stronger than any European. In such a situation, the inability to pursue an independent foreign policy looks like an absolute anomaly. However, the behavior of Seoul is sent from Washington. 30 – 40 years ago it was understandable, explicable and even rational. Today is completely unacceptable, although, unfortunately, explainable. The basis of this phenomenon are purely psychological reasons. Southerners simply cannot believe in their own strengths and capabilities, and the Americans are doing everything to ensure that this never happens. At the same time, it is pointless to make claims to the USA - they act in accordance with their ideological attitudes and geopolitical interests. Washington should uphold American interests, not Korean interests. But Seoul is obliged to protect their own, not strangers.

It’s time for the people and authorities of the Republic of Korea to realize that it’s better to release another thousand instead of the next million smartphones for export tanks for myself. And maybe create your own nuclear weapons. Then start talking with Pyongyang on an equal footing, without fear and without arrogance. If the goal is really to unite the country with its future transformation into a great power, it is necessary to accept the North Korean version of unification, no matter how complex and time-consuming it may be. Moreover, then convergence will still occur and South Korean economic superiority will play the main role. If Seoul continues to wait until the regime in Pyongyang collapses or surrenders voluntarily, they will receive one of two. Either North Korea will become a puppet, if not a colony of China, or the two countries will mentally disperse so much that their peoples simply do not want to unite.

The Republic of Korea urgently needs the Juche and Songun ideas. They absolutely do not have to be communist. Only on their basis will it be possible to build a single great country.
Author:
Originator:
http://vpk-news.ru/articles/30854
78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Bayonet
    Bayonet 4 June 2016 05: 58
    +10
    "It's time for the people and authorities of the Republic of Korea to understand that instead of another million smartphones for export, it is better to release another thousand tanks for themselves." - The people of Korea know better what is better, so they have a powerful economy and a high standard of living. And "a thousand tanks" is more needed by fans of "Juche" ...
    1. atalef
      atalef 4 June 2016 08: 20
      +3
      Quote: Bayonet
      "It's time for the people and authorities of the Republic of Korea to understand that instead of another million smartphones for export, it is better to release another thousand tanks for themselves." - The people of Korea know better what is better, so they have a powerful economy and a high standard of living. And "a thousand tanks" is more needed by fans of "Juche" ...

      The number of articles in the VO about North Korea - just tearing the brain.
      the author is generally stuffed
      It’s time for the people and authorities of the Republic of Korea to understand that it’s better to release another thousand tanks for export instead of the next million smartphones. And maybe create your own nuclear weapons. Then start talking with Pyongyang on an equal footing, without fear and without arrogance. If the goal is really to unite the country

      In the place of the DPRK, I would constantly say the same thing about unification - this is the easiest way to feed - to take away. laughing
      1. Alibekulu
        Alibekulu 4 June 2016 10: 20
        +1
        Quote: atalef
        The number of articles in the VO about North Korea - just tearing the brain.
        the author is generally stuffed
        The author is preparing the Russians for a similar future .. laughing So Putin also warned: "I will defend the sovereignty of Russia until the end of my life."



        So dear members of the forum "There is no money. But you hold on there, all the best to you" hi
        1. kotvov
          kotvov 4 June 2016 11: 01
          -2
          So dear members of the forum "There is no money. But you hold on there, all the best to you"
          with all my bad attitude towards the iPhone, you first look at this video and then echid. [media = http: // https: //www.youtube.com/watch? v = 0XjLSdqUpx8]
        2. Simpsonian
          Simpsonian 4 June 2016 12: 03
          0
          Welcome to Nazobaev ... And 15 years of Zhanaozen without the right to correspond.
          1. Alibekulu
            Alibekulu 4 June 2016 12: 38
            -1
            Quote: Simpsonian
            Welcome to Nazobaev ... And 15 years of Zhanaozen without the right to correspond.
            What questions to Nursultan Abishevich?
            He is already "preparing for the ground" request .
            A national pantheon worth 215 million euros will be built on the area of ​​a thousand hectares near the Kazakh capital
            “The Pantheon should be ready for the funeral of Nursultan Nazarbayev,” said opposition leader Bakhytzhan Ketebayev in an interview with the German Wave television and radio company, former head of the K-plus TV channel.
            The Pantheon is planned to be built in 17 kilometers from Astana on an area of ​​almost a thousand hectares. It is expected that the construction of 26 in May will be finally coordinated with the deputies of the maslikhat (local representative body) of Akmola region, bordering Astana, who will agree to transfer land for the construction of a complex of tombs.

            And Vladimir Vladimirovich is young, "heroic strength" has nowhere to do, so you will still have "CrimeaNash", Syria and Donbass .. crying
            But even in China - 10 has worked for years, all the regulationsyes - all on the way out.
            Without any "castling", "cunning plans" and "galley slaves" good
            1. razmik72
              razmik72 4 June 2016 13: 56
              0
              Alibek, all this futuristic laughing pantheon build for Elbasy wink or does someone from the local Politburo want to get in there too?
              1. Alibekulu
                Alibekulu 4 June 2016 15: 59
                +4
                Quote: razmik72
                Do all this futuristic pantheon is built for Elbasy or does any of the local Politburo want to go there?
                Well, officially
                The creation of the “National Pantheon” object is aimed at perpetuating the memory of prominent figures of the state, science, culture, as well as those who contributed to the development of Kazakhstan.
                but everyone understands what this "Mausoleum" is for.
                What is more interesting here is that he still does not trust his environment, despite their openly expressed assurances of loyalty. Although, in theory, a grateful "heir" as a token of gratitude, on the contrary, will make every effort to "perpetuate" the memory of Elbasy. Apparently the example of Turkmenbashi was too illustrative request
                And so he is still going to rule well .. lol
                Nursultan Nazarbayev voiced the state interest in the problems of gerontology and geriatrics.
                The most effective drug today is Epiphysis. 50 experiments were carried out and 50 cases of life extension were achieved. True, this drug is not produced - there are no raw materials. It is made from a special section of the brain of cattle. When Nursultan Nazarbayev needed such raw materials, it turned out that all meat processing plants capable of receiving it were destroyed in Kazakhstan. The situation is similar in Russia. But in Belarus they can do it and the necessary consignment was delivered to Kazakhstan on the instructions of Alexander Lukashenko.
                And just recently, a year ago, we even had Eurasian Congress of Gerontologists organized by the Medical Center of the Office of the President of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
                Here it is what In general, "Long Summer" by N.A.
                1. razmik72
                  razmik72 4 June 2016 17: 16
                  +7
                  General Alibek, you are a courageous person, since you raise such questions on this site, here they will instantly "peck" for the slightest criticism of the authorities. Power is given to us from God and we must glorify it, but nothing else.
                  1. Alibekulu
                    Alibekulu 5 June 2016 18: 49
                    +1
                    Quote: razmik72
                    General Alibek
                    Thick, thinner lol but thanks drinks I once was a marshal on the contrary - with 2-I skulls on shoulder straps .. laughing
                    Quote: razmik72
                    you are a courageous man, since he raises such questions on this site
                    Yes, so petty troll, in the internet a lot of courage is not necessary ..
                    Quote: razmik72
                    here instantly "peck" for the slightest criticism of the authorities
                    You then on Drom.ru or Sports.ru ..
            2. AllXVahhaB
              AllXVahhaB 7 June 2016 04: 55
              -1
              Quote: Alibekulu
              He is already "preparing for the ground"

              He has not left yet, but you have already begun to boil. You’ll go further along the path of the Outskirts - we will push the Sevres and the East as Donbas and Crimea! You need to pray on elbasy! As soon as he dies, the Zhuzes for power will be changed and the Russian regions will disconnect!
    2. siberalt
      siberalt 4 June 2016 08: 53
      +5
      It is too early to say that the DPRK possesses nuclear weapons. She doesn’t have it yet. There have been tests of nuclear devices, but there is still a huge distance to warheads. Sanctions are imposed in accordance with the UN resolution for the development of such.
  2. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 4 June 2016 06: 05
    +11
    just leave them alone ...
    1. igorek4515
      igorek4515 4 June 2016 22: 31
      +1
      Sanctions are imposed in accordance with the UN resolution for the development of such.

      Well .. then why didn’t sanctions be imposed on the development of nuclear weapons on India, Israel, Pakistan, the USA, China, Russia, France, England ..? How do you explain this ..?
      1. 0255
        0255 5 June 2016 20: 33
        -1
        Quote: igorek4515
        Sanctions are imposed in accordance with the UN resolution for the development of such.

        Well .. then why didn’t sanctions be imposed on the development of nuclear weapons on India, Israel, Pakistan, the USA, China, Russia, France, England ..? How do you explain this ..?

        Maybe because no one except the DPRK threatens to launch a nuclear missile at its neighbors every year? Although Pakistan, the United States and God's chosen nuclear weapons, too, would not hurt to pick up.
  3. coolpechkin
    coolpechkin 4 June 2016 06: 30
    +13
    I read about the fact that Korea needs the idea of ​​Juche and thousands of tanks. And by the way, the entire military-political leadership of the DPRK should be shot to hell for bringing the country to such a bright future. In general, from the article, I realized that the author is either id..t or a populist, not mentally healthy, etc. And I decided to find out who Alexander Khramchikhin is and so this political scientist suggested destroying Russian nuclear weapons so that NATO could capture us and thereby save us from occupation Of China. He declared on August 7, 2008, the day before the war, that the offensive of Georgia was completely ruled out and that in 2012 Syria and Iran would be defeated.
    1. akims
      akims 4 June 2016 07: 58
      +2
      There, the profession and political beliefs are clearly visible in the photo.
    2. Camel
      Camel 4 June 2016 08: 06
      +1
      If it doesn’t bother you, can you refer to the author?
      1. coolpechkin
        coolpechkin 4 June 2016 08: 13
        +5
        At the end of the article, the author is written Alexander Khramchikhin and who he is and what he does, you can easily find using Yandex or what you like best.
        1. Talgat
          Talgat 4 June 2016 17: 28
          +3
          Khramchikhin regularly publishes extreme anti-Chinese articles. much has been written about him that he is engaged by the West - well, there are grants of financing

          Skillfully passes off his speculation as truth - you read such an article and really think that it is - but in fact, not everything is as it describes of course. This is a purely pro-Western point of view.
    3. kotvov
      kotvov 4 June 2016 11: 02
      +1
      And by the way, the entire military-political leadership of the DPRK must be shot to hell for bringing the country to such a bright future,
      so join the US Army. and you will have such an opportunity.
      1. Simpsonian
        Simpsonian 4 June 2016 12: 06
        +3
        The United States Army (and not just one) 65 years ago, for such an opportunity, the PRC army was laying it, and now it is laying it
      2. The comment was deleted.
  4. Karasik
    Karasik 4 June 2016 06: 42
    +8
    An interesting topic was raised by the author: really, why can some countries have nuclear weapons, while others cannot? If it's primitive, then it's like in the licensing system of the police - a citizen comes and says that he wants to buy a weapon. They explain to him what certificates he should collect, where and what courses to take, etc. Then his case is considered and he is either denied or given permission. If they give, he goes and buys a gun. Something similar should be in relation to nuclear weapons. The question is which international organization will act as the "police permitting department". After all, even if you create a new organization, especially for the above, all the same, over time, it will begin to "creep" under the "world hegemon", will not be able to be independent and not engaged. I think this is a good topic for discussion on our site.
    1. Bayonet
      Bayonet 4 June 2016 07: 20
      +2
      Quote: Karasik
      why can some countries have nuclear weapons, but not others?

      "If in the first act there is a gun hanging on the wall, then in the last one it will certainly fire."
      And the more such guns, the more likely the shot!
      1. Karasik
        Karasik 4 June 2016 07: 35
        +6
        Quote: Bayonet
        "If in the first act there is a gun hanging on the wall, then in the last one it will certainly fire."
        And the more such guns, the more likely the shot!

        This "gun" has already fired. Twice, in 1945. The whole world saw the consequences of these shots. The conclusions that were made - let it be better that the "gun" hangs on the wall (or better, there are many such "guns") so that all the neighbors can see and no one climbs. You cannot shoot from it, but threaten - as much as you like. Deterrence weapon. This is what I would like to talk about: who has the right to have such a "gun" and who does not. For example: "You, a neighbor, are inadequate, an alcoholic, a maniac, etc., you don't want to! But he can, he's good!"
    2. RedBaron
      RedBaron 4 June 2016 07: 33
      +2
      North Korea signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and got the technology ... and then violated it by creating a bomb. So do not confuse warm with soft.
      1. Erg
        Erg 4 June 2016 07: 38
        +9
        Yes, yes, you are absolutely right. After all, only the United States is allowed to violate treaties. wassat
        1. RedBaron
          RedBaron 4 June 2016 15: 39
          +3
          Quote: Erg
          Yes, yes, you are absolutely right. After all, only the United States is allowed to violate treaties. wassat

          and what did they violate in this case? The Russian Federation, as well as China, supports all UN sanctions against the UK, since far from initiating it is possible to blackmail yourself to a crazy king.
      2. Karasik
        Karasik 4 June 2016 07: 46
        +6
        Quote: RedBaron
        North Korea signed the nuclear non-proliferation treaty and got the technology ... and then violated it by creating a bomb. So do not confuse warm with soft.

        I'm not about North Korea, but in general. And as for the contracts, I think only naive people believe in their strength. Any contract is just a piece of paper that you can tear and forget when it is profitable (or vice versa, unprofitable) IF ... you have gained enough strength and weight. The sad realities of our time.
    3. igorek4515
      igorek4515 4 June 2016 22: 35
      +1
      Something similar should be in relation to nuclear weapons. The question is which international organization will act as the "police permitting department"

      There is nothing like that regarding nuclear weapons. There is article 10 of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons:
      http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/npt.shtml
      Article X
      1. Each Party to this Treaty, in the exercise of state sovereignty, has the right to withdraw from the Treaty if it decides that the exceptional circumstances related to the content of this Treaty have jeopardized the highest interests of its country. He shall notify such withdrawal in three months to all Parties to the Treaty and to the United Nations Security Council. Such a notice should contain a statement of exceptional circumstances, which he considers to be in jeopardy of his highest interests.
    4. cast iron
      cast iron 5 June 2016 20: 14
      0
      Why is that interesting? There is a strong rule in the world. The rest of the countries received their nuclear weapons not because they are so smart, but because the USSR and the USA at one time gave them such technologies in exchange for military alliances in the fight against each other. Because The USSR has not existed for 25 years, then nuclear weapons must no longer be given to new states, but they will not give new ones, because a strong country will never allow the strengthening of other countries.
  5. Holsten
    Holsten 4 June 2016 06: 45
    +8
    To resolve many conflicts, you first need to arrange such a large Maidan in the USA so that they take care of their problems and leave the whole world alone.
  6. godofwar6699
    godofwar6699 4 June 2016 06: 58
    +4
    Korean peninsula from space. are they alivebelay
    1. Anatole Klim
      Anatole Klim 4 June 2016 07: 09
      +4
      Quote: godofwar6699
      are they alive

      Alive, still alive. The South Korean singer sings well, and even under the video of the parade from North Korea
      1. verboo
        verboo 4 June 2016 17: 31
        +1
        Quote: Anatol Klim
        South Korean singer sings well

        Blood type. Choi. Rehash.
        Or vice versa, this Choi is something Korean national at one time quail.
        1. Anatole Klim
          Anatole Klim 4 June 2016 19: 19
          0
          Quote: verboo
          Blood type. Choi. Rehash.

          Quite right - re-singing, re-singing means like, moreover, in different languages, I don’t understand what your negative is.
          Or vice versa, this Choi is something Korean national at one time quail.

          Again, I don’t see a problem, Russian culture is multinational, in our Volga region Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Tatars, Mordovians, Chuvashs, Mari ... they sing their songs, they don’t interfere with anyone that’s bad, I don’t understand your comment.
          1. verboo
            verboo 4 June 2016 20: 02
            +1
            Quote: Anatol Klim
            I don’t understand what is your negative.

            And do not understand. Because there is no negative.
    2. coolpechkin
      coolpechkin 4 June 2016 07: 09
      +4
      This is a light disguise in fact they are building a bright future there.
      1. godofwar6699
        godofwar6699 4 June 2016 07: 12
        +4
        Quote: coolpechkin
        bright future



        without light? what
        1. coolpechkin
          coolpechkin 4 June 2016 07: 18
          0
          I say blackout soldier
        2. 0255
          0255 4 June 2016 16: 46
          +3
          Quote: godofwar6699
          Quote: coolpechkin
          bright future

          without light? what

          Yes, here one fan of Kim wrote that the lack of light does not say anything about the poverty of the country, another - that for the sake of the "sun-faced" Kim Jong-un, you can live without light lol
          1. strannik1985
            strannik1985 4 June 2016 17: 36
            +1
            Condemning cornered is easy.
            What will be the standard of living in the Republic of Kazakhstan in the conditions of the DPRK?
            1. Odysseus
              Odysseus 4 June 2016 20: 21
              +4
              Quote: strannik1985
              What will be the standard of living in the Republic of Kazakhstan in the conditions of the DPRK?

              No, the country will literally begin a civil war and mass hunger in a couple of months. The state will de facto cease to exist, quickly losing even a monopoly on violence. However, it is more likely that the UK in this case will surrender to the mercy of the winner on any terms.
              Quote: strannik1985
              Condemning cornered is easy.

              And who condemns them? Only Western capitalists to whom they are like a bone in the throat, but shabesgoy from the local.
              Do not pay attention to the locals, slaves do not understand free people and sincerely worry about their master. How can someone dare to live of their own free will and not listen to the instructions of the owner? Here is the leitmotif of their worldview.
              As for their American owners, they “see an eye, but a tooth doesn’t.” They cannot do anything with the DPRK. So let them at least burst with anger, hatred and complexes smile
    3. Bayonet
      Bayonet 4 June 2016 07: 25
      +1
      Quote: godofwar6699
      Korean peninsula from space. are they alive

      Fukushi Kojiro - “Oh, don't think that the world is steeped in darkness, - People just don’t share the light.” smile
      1. godofwar6699
        godofwar6699 4 June 2016 07: 46
        +4
        the food looks good smile
        at the end of the Lincoln Navigator video.
        1. AID.S
          AID.S 4 June 2016 09: 14
          +11
          Poor, rustic, but clean and ruin is not observed.
    4. Simpsonian
      Simpsonian 4 June 2016 12: 02
      +3
      they sleep like normal people at night, work during the day
    5. The comment was deleted.
  7. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 4 June 2016 07: 08
    +9
    And who do they come from, these "double standards"? Here it is and it is. The law is the law and must be followed. Whoever he was. Forcing the United States and the West under its control to comply with all the norms and requirements of international law and "lawlessness" in the world will diminish significantly. And Korea really should be left alone, let them decide how they should unite. And they unite, I have no doubt.
  8. Erg
    Erg 4 June 2016 07: 24
    0
    Two Germany and two Koreas are two "big differences." Unification will be possible if "Gorbachev" appears in the DPRK. But, apparently, Wall Street doesn't need it yet.
  9. strannik1985
    strannik1985 4 June 2016 07: 25
    +7
    Everything is very simple, Khramchikhin’s statement is another duck about the cooling of Korean-Chinese relations, there have been many of these recently, you have to refute them at the official level. Forced Korean women to have half-breeds, mass persecution of Chinese citizens for espionage, a ban on Korean vessels from entering Chinese ports, a suspicion of making fake yuan to the DPRK, allegedly a statement by the official Chinese media, although it was actually written by a private company from a Hong Kong holding, etc. Khramchikhin is not original here, just another statement about:
    1. A break with one of two natural allies.
    2. Unification with the implacable (in existing realities) adversary, only in the Russian media field.
    1. Anatole Klim
      Anatole Klim 4 June 2016 07: 50
      +3
      In fact, now there is a conspiracy of Washington and Beijing to overthrow the regime in Pyongyang ... At the same time, both Washington and Beijing hope after that to bring North Korea under their full control.

      Is it beneficial for China that North Korea become pro-American, I don’t think that China will give up the DPRK, China, like Russia, needs an adequate and negotiable North Korea, I hope it will reach Kim.
  10. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 4 June 2016 08: 17
    +14
    I must say that South Korea is very impressive. How do they work there! Everywhere. In factories, in transport, in a restaurant ... Simply amazing results. But not everyone, probably knows that in the Republic of Korea there are no paid holidays! A week! And work, work. And it cannot be said that for such work they get a lot or live classy. They live very modestly. I’ll tell you my opinion, if we had plowed like that, questions about who the world's first economy would not have arisen.
    I haven’t been to North Korea, I supplied one installation for them. The adjusters talked about life there. It's sad. Not a concentration camp, of course, but - "not inspiring." Hard work, a very meager and hopeless life, constant "political information" on radio and television, and very popular "snitching". For this Juche the whole Klim Chen Irov-ynov family would not have spared. But they do not personally hold this pyramid of power! This backbone of elites and elites is completely reinforced concrete. So what about the unification is not visible in ANY way.
    Well, Khramchikhin is a famous liar. Lives in parallel reality. It would be better if Satanovsky was published more often. Or Wasserman.
  11. Pyokhar
    Pyokhar 4 June 2016 08: 50
    0
    I take it this way: the United States exists pokedov, and the DPRK must exist.
    To be discouraged.
  12. Dimon19661
    Dimon19661 4 June 2016 08: 57
    +4
    The article put a minus.
  13. timyr
    timyr 4 June 2016 09: 41
    +5
    RK will begin to introduce its own funny policy. The author at least wondered where the prosperity of Korea began. And I would have known that in the 80s, exports from Kazakhstan to the United States grew 6 times. And southerners will refuse this, they are crazy.
  14. tilix
    tilix 4 June 2016 10: 45
    +1
    The author explains that, as if voluntarily, Kim would not leave, so that he doubted. But in principle, where to reunite is quite simple to decide. To open the border, in which direction the more will tumble, so slippers. Does anyone have doubts where to run?
  15. Kenneth
    Kenneth 4 June 2016 10: 54
    +3
    And because the northerners need less to yell about the fact that their nuclear bombs will fall on the imperialists. Neither India nor Pakistan have said such a thing. And the imperialists for the DPRK are welcome and we, too
    And Iran, by the way, also received sanctions for shouting too much into the voice about the destruction of other countries. Just in case, horny bulls are sawn off horns.
  16. 0255
    0255 4 June 2016 11: 42
    +2
    3 years ago, Khramchikhin wrote that the United States and NATO are not a threat to us, but now he is writing how the United States wants to remove from power in the DPRK the white and fluffy "great sun-like marshal" Kim Jong-un. What is it for?
  17. voyaka uh
    voyaka uh 4 June 2016 11: 55
    +3
    "It's time for the people and authorities of the Republic of Korea to understand that instead of another million smartphones for export, it is better to release another thousand tanks for themselves." ///////

    The phrase is phenomenally dumb. In translation: "give up high technology in favor of the military."
    High technology is the key to South Korea’s strength and guarantee the success of its military-industrial complex.
    In general, Khramchikhin disappoints me more and more ...
    1. ishty
      ishty 5 June 2016 15: 26
      0
      The question may be posed differently. Is it possible to buy a thousand necessary tanks for income from the income of another million smartphones for export? Or a hundred?
  18. AllXVahhaB
    AllXVahhaB 4 June 2016 12: 16
    0
    Well, let's say China is still divided and it still remains divided ...
  19. Aldobr
    Aldobr 4 June 2016 12: 47
    +2
    Quote: Dimon19661
    The article put a minus.


    +
  20. Evgen999
    Evgen999 4 June 2016 13: 16
    +3
    Be South Korea at least a thousand times a puppet of the United States, well-fed and happy, puppet South Koreans are far less dangerous to those around them than corrupted leaders with hungry people and a vigorous bomb in their hands. Yes, even trade relations connect us with South Korea much more. North Korea is a real thorn in the eye, the author is very strange. Well, at least there are no stupid comments about the prosperous DPRK, it is already pleasing
    1. 0255
      0255 4 June 2016 14: 09
      +1
      Quote: Evgen999
      Well, at least there are no stupid comments about the prosperous DPRK, it is already pleasing

      It’s even strange that no request
  21. Galleon
    Galleon 4 June 2016 14: 25
    +3
    Quote: Bayonet
    Quote: Karasik
    why can some countries have nuclear weapons, but not others?

    "If in the first act there is a gun hanging on the wall, then in the last one it will certainly fire."
    And the more such guns, the more likely the shot!

    Imagine that 10 years ago Turkey joined such an organization angry and got her nuclear weapons. And what would happen now? Or something else - in 1991 Ukraine decided to have its own nuclear weapons from what remained on its territory after the Union. Where would it be now? request
    I answer myself: they would have stolen a long time and sold secretly, nothing would have remained for this war ...
  22. verboo
    verboo 4 June 2016 17: 19
    +4
    Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
    Democratic Pyongyang against totalitarian Seoul

    Enchanting.
    Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
    There is a conspiracy of Washington and Beijing to overthrow the regime in Pyongyang through its economic collapse

    More than enchanting.
    Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
    Why 71 years ago, Moscow went to the division of Korea

    1. 71 a year ago was 1945.
    2. Who in the world was interested in the opinion of the USSR in 1953-54?
    Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
    although it could have occupied it entirely without problems, it’s not entirely clear

    The degree of enchantment of pearls is growing. I can imagine what will happen in the end.
    Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
    Why no one divided China

    In fact, it is still divided.
    Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
    As a result, we have a divided nation

    Khramchishin Korean? Did not know. You can’t tell by surname.
    Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
    on the other, they dream of uniting

    Controversial statement. Rather, each side dreams of absorbing an opponent. For example, how Germany absorbed the GDR.
    Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
    For some reason, no one thought to impose sanctions against Seoul, or even just condemn it.

    It's all about the head of the missiles. Resp. Korea has no nuclear weapons, so few people are interested in their missile program.
    Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
    The same applies to the possession of nuclear weapons.

    Well, of course. Do not fantasize Mr. Khramchikhin.
    Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
    However, for some reason only five countries (permanent members of the Security Council) were allowed to have it. This is already a double standard.

    I propose to Mr. Khramchikhin to vividly imagine what could happen to his house if a missile with a nuclear warhead arrives in his native Mukhosk or its environs. From Sev. Korea, for example.
    1. verboo
      verboo 4 June 2016 17: 21
      -1
      Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
      This was done (except for the voluntarily disarmament of South Africa) by Israel, India and Pakistan. And they had absolutely nothing for it.

      For starters, Israel’s possession of nuclear weapons has not been confirmed by anyone. It may well turn out to be one big bluff.
      In addition, the mere possession of nuclear weapons is also of little interest to anyone. Indeed, without delivery vehicles, it will be like the USSR in the 50s, it can undermine itself, and nothing more.
      The availability of delivery vehicles is interesting. In India and Pakistan, this is all bad. And here is Sev. Korea is moving forward briskly. And soon her missiles will really threaten US territory. Therefore, they will extinguish it, most likely, soon enough and harshly. Not with your own hands, of course. And without the use of nuclear weapons.
      Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
      In fact, now there is a conspiracy of Washington and Beijing with the aim of overthrowing the regime in Pyongyang through its economic collapse.

      Here's another "villain" drew. In this case, it would not hurt the author to "strip his eyes".
      Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
      This is Moscow’s biggest foreign policy mistake in recent years.

      Rather than?
      Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
      DPRK leadership must declare

      Their statements are of no interest to anyone. Only if he cuts all the rockets and blows up all the factories for their production. Only in this case they will be heard.
      But this is a fantastic scenario.
      Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
      in Serbia and Iraq. The DPRK has every right not to want to share the fate of these countries.

      The future of the North. Korea is much more sad, in my opinion. I would not give a broken penny for her "statehood", in a completely near future.
      Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
      It’s time for the people and authorities of the Republic of Korea to understand that it’s better to release another thousand tanks for export instead of the next million smartphones.

      Everything, as I expected at the beginning. The finale is super enchanting.
      Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
      North Korea will become a puppet, if not a colony of China

      Well, who is most likely out of business. Although, if a fantastic scenario happens (see above), then everything can be.
      Quote: Alexander Khramchikhin
      The Republic of Korea urgently needs the ideas of Juche and Songun.

      South Koreans know best what they need. And without the advice of the author, they somehow live.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. stoqn477
    stoqn477 4 June 2016 20: 18
    +3
    The author should not miss drinking pills.
    1. Anglorussian
      Anglorussian 4 June 2016 21: 17
      0
      The author should not miss drinking pills.
      I think lobotomy will be much more useful to him.
      1. stoqn477
        stoqn477 4 June 2016 23: 33
        0
        Quote: Anglorussian
        The author should not miss drinking pills.
        I think lobotomy will be much more useful to him.

        laughing laughing hi
        1. Simpsonian
          Simpsonian 5 June 2016 05: 03
          +1
          You didn’t guess it at all, gentlemen! According to various sources, South Korea is in the 1st, 2nd or 3rd place by the number of suicides ...
  25. Tired
    Tired 5 June 2016 07: 56
    +2
    Unification is unnecessary for the southerners because they already have a very high standard of living and they have no desire to raise it among the northerners at their own expense. Unification is not necessary for the northerners because in fact there the authorities are not even Jucheists, but simply a monarchist dynasty of dictators who is most concerned about maintaining power. Unification is not necessary for the United States either because, firstly, they lose the convenient Baba Yaga whose role is obediently performed by the leadership of the northerners (it is quite possible that by agreement), and secondly, in the short term, the unification of the Koreas is an economic crisis, in the long-term it is a significant upsurge of the Republic of Korea and this not needed by all players in the region including the Japanese and Chinese.
    1. nerd.su
      nerd.su 5 June 2016 14: 35
      0
      Quote: Tired
      Unification is unnecessary for the southerners because they already have a very high standard of living and they have no desire to raise it among the northerners at their own expense.

      Yes, the southerners have such a desire. They have already calculated the costs and are ready to bear them. Moreover, the USA will help them if such a union happens with the leading role of the southerners. For it will be necessary to confirm the superiority of capitalism, and a significant deterioration in the standard of living is not suitable for confirmation. So Americans will give both money and the sales market will organize.
      Only the northerners will not agree, not because only the "dynasty" of Kims will suffer. Everyone will suffer, who are now in leadership positions. Mass repressions will begin, because it is necessary to put somewhere a huge pile of military men, ministries of internal affairs, special services, party workers, scientists, heads of medical and educational institutions. If they are not moved, they sabotage the ideas of the southerners, if they are simply moved, the unrest of those who have lost their former privileges will begin. Therefore, by a known method, they will solve the issue - everyone in the camps. They will only call it a thread democratically.
      Therefore, confederation-based unification is now the only way for Koreans.
      But Japan, China, and to some extent Russia, a united Korea is not needed.
      1. Tired
        Tired 5 June 2016 16: 47
        0
        Quote: bot.su
        Moreover, the USA will help them if such a union happens with the leading role of the southerners.

        I strongly doubt it. The existence of North Korea justifies the military presence of states in the region - especially in South Korea and Japan. If North Korea does not become and South Korea eventually receives nuclear weapons, then for the states this is rather a minus than a plus, as well as for Japan and China. And there is no enthusiasm among the top echelon South Korean entrepreneurs / politicians about the cost of the merger. But if something happens, the southerners may not freeze with democratic measures. The very power in South Korea even a dozen years ago did not differ much from the military dictatorship, and in relation to everything related to the "northern neighbor" their legislation is very repressive.
        1. nerd.su
          nerd.su 5 June 2016 17: 19
          0
          Quote: Tired
          I doubt it very much. The existence of North Korea justifies the military presence of states in the region

          I meant the purely theoretical situation of the unification that had already happened. In this case, the alternative to American assistance will be Chinese and Russian with a corresponding increase in influence. The Americans cannot understand this.
          And in the fact that they are not interested in the unification of Korea and will not make efforts for this, here I agree. With one clarification - if it will be a political union based on consensus. And to support South Korea in some sort of military adventure or organization of a coup d'etat with the subsequent occupation, this is the United States easily. And his bases to the north of Korea are advanced in order to protect them from the threats of various dragons and bears. Yes, only the dragon and the bear do not sleep.
          1. Tired
            Tired 5 June 2016 17: 30
            0
            Quote: bot.su
            And his bases to the north of Korea are advanced in order to protect them from the threats of various dragons and bears.

            This option is quite possible, the environment of China is one of the global goals of the United States. But there is a nuance - they will have to explain to the Koreans that now they should be an actual human shield against China and Russia.
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. Backfire
    Backfire 6 June 2016 05: 25
    0
    Quote: Bayonet
    "It's time for the people and authorities of the Republic of Korea to understand that instead of another million smartphones for export, it is better to release another thousand tanks for themselves." - The people of Korea know better what is better, so they have a powerful economy and a high standard of living. And "a thousand tanks" is more needed by fans of "Juche" ...
  28. Jääkorppi
    Jääkorppi 7 June 2016 15: 51
    0
    Twenty-five again, people who have never been to North Korea, and life in South is represented only by smartphones! Repeating stupid propaganda s can only Russophobia and anti-Soviet !! Normal people live and work in the DPRK, and taking into account the sanctions and blockade, it is not worse than in democratic Tajikistan, Afghanistan, Iraqis and even Romanians. And in South Korea, occupied by the USA, there is a terrible dictatorship and such exploitation that in Russia it’s not life, but raspberries, and Khrushchev’s are palaces compared to their houses !!
    1. overb
      overb 7 June 2016 16: 09
      0
      Quote: JääKorppi
      and even romania.

      Have you been to Romania? This, by the way, is the European Union. And they live there richer than in Russia. Have you decided to argue that in Sev. Korea live richer than in Russia?
      Quote: JääKorppi
      And in South Korea, occupied by the USA, there is a terrible dictatorship and such exploitation that in Russia it’s not life, but raspberries, and Khrushchev’s are palaces compared to their houses !!

      Do you know who are the most popular tourists in the world now? Chinese. Who is in second place? Yu Koreans. Do you think they are traveling the world from great hunger? From their "squalid dwellings"?
      Learn at least basic statistics. The average South Korean is almost 8 times richer than the average Russian. http://publications.credit-suisse.com/tasks/render/file/index.cfm?fileid=C26E382
      4-E868-56E0-CCA04D4BB9B9ADD5 You can’t even compare with the Korean.