Paul Craig Roberts: Will Russia Withstand Washington's Economic Attack? (Institute for Political Economy, USA)

96
Paul Craig Roberts: Will Russia Withstand Washington's Economic Attack? (Institute for Political Economy, USA)


Recently, Deputy US State Department spokesman Mark Toner reminded US companies on the economic and reputational risks associated with doing business with Russia as long as it does not return the Crimea pro-American puppet regime in Kiev.

My point of view is significantly different from the views of the State Department. The only risk that the corporation may face due to their work in Russia comes from the US government. Washington will certainly punish US companies, if they are not part of the corporate oligarchy that has immunity against any sanctions.

If there is a risk and in fact, it is a risk for Russia. For example, if a Russian company doing business with the US partner, this American company somehow receives information about Russia, which is provided by the CIA.

When the Russian central bank sells government bonds, wall street, acting in the interests of the CIA, may acquire bonds and then dump them inappropriately while to harm Russia by reducing their cost. This price cut will then be used as a means of propaganda, according to which Russia is failing and its bonds are worthless.

When the Russian government allows the ruble to trade on the international foreign exchange market, it actually provides an opportunity for Washington to speculate against the Russian currency and seek to reduce its value. This exchange rate depreciation will then be used by propaganda in an attempt to prove that the ruble is a depreciating currency.

When the Russian government to attract foreign investment, Washington is able to withdraw money from Russia at the wrong time and thus destabilize the Russian economy.

The Russian government should forget about all of Washington's sanctions. In essence, these sanctions have had enormous Russian assistance. Prior to their introduction, Washington used the integration of Russia into the global economy as a third world country, supplier of raw materials and importer of high-tech products. It is in this way controlled Russia Washington. As a result of economic sanctions, Russia has become more self-sufficient and focused on production for their own use, and not for the needs of the West.

Instead of worrying about Washington’s sanctions, the Russian government should impose its own sanctions on Russian companies doing business with the United States. Carrying out their activities abroad, American corporations act as agents of the CIA, performing tasks within the framework of Washington’s policy aimed at destabilizing Russia and China.

To see this, you should look at history Latin America. All reformist governments in those Latin American countries where the US business presence took place were, sooner or later, destabilized and overthrown.

Russia's goal should be complete separation from the West, and not integration into Western structures. Such integration means for it to become a vassal state. Russia, China and India together make up the largest potential market on the planet and occupy the largest territory. These three countries should focus on integrating their economies and isolating them from the West.

Modern monetary theory associated with such prominent economists as Maykl Hadson, makes it clear that countries have to finance their own infrastructure and to carry out any productive investment to create money, not debt. Using the public debt simply allows private banks to create money, and that debt servicing accounts paying interest to banks, which depletes the purchasing power of the economy.

If Russia will allow the West to control its economy, it could give Washington control including over its armed forces. Unfortunately for the government and the Russian people, the Central Bank and neoliberal economists are too naive and trusting, to be able to defend Russia from the economic destabilization. As long as Russia does not find much more qualified economic advisers, the future of the country remains vague and uncertain.
96 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +60
    2 June 2016 15: 54
    In short, the conclusion is this: to send all the curls with things out, to send the penidos with the Eurogays in the direction of Naui, to raise their economists. so Yes. but first of all, Russia must be made a country of Engineers. then the devil himself will not be afraid of us.
    1. +59
      2 June 2016 15: 56
      "The goal of Russia should be complete isolation from the West, and not integration into Western structures. Such integration means for her becoming a vassal state."

      This is necessary for Kudrin to repeat separately. Three times.
      1. +39
        2 June 2016 15: 59
        And not just repeat, but engrave on a metal plate, which is nailed to Kudrin's nails on the forehead.
        1. FID
          +26
          2 June 2016 16: 08
          Quote: Flinky
          And not just repeat, but engrave on a metal plate, which is nailed to Kudrin’s nails

          Then he just won’t see what is written! To the camp and let it engrave and mint for ten years ...
          And teach his biography in elite schools and institutes, so that everyone knows!
          1. +1
            2 June 2016 16: 41
            Quote: SSI
            To the camp and let it engrave and mint for ten years ...

            -----------------
            Let them sew mittens like Khodorkovsky. He will not master it.
          2. +10
            2 June 2016 16: 49
            Quote: Reserve officer
            “The goal of Russia should be complete isolation from the West, not integration into Western structures.

            Quote: Flinky
            And not just repeat, but engrave on a metal plate, which is nailed to Kudrin's nails on the forehead.

            Quote: SSI
            To the camp and let it engrave and mint for ten years ...


            And you thought it would be so easy to butt for the first place in the world, within the framework of the weapons proposed by the West, economic and informational? Naive people and stupid! Yes, at least get the disadvantages))) To abandon an open economy is the same as giving up fighting, struggles, frightening, fleeing, sieging, again isolating, which the West is seeking to deprive Russia of foreign markets and development. And it may still be too early to give up without a fight, we always have time to leave for a defensive defense. Moreover, in today's situation, this means leaving in even worse conditions than it was in the USSR, the USSR at least had a gigantic market and resources in the 15 of the Union republics and the CMEA camp. I repeat for the umpteenth time, as I am sure that Russia will not be destroyed by the United States and the West, not by the West American military prodigies, not by the government’s economic, temporarily necessary government bloc, and not by far distant, agitated, emotional patriots, as has already been repeatedly stories...
            1. +4
              2 June 2016 19: 42
              Quote: SPACE

              And you thought it would be so easy

              Nobody, my friend thought and thinks that it will be easy. Therefore, I want to note (without putting a minus or a plus): you very viciously called the whole nation naive and stupid. Russia just does not refuse an open economy on equal terms. therefore, Russia does not run away, does not refuse to fight, etc., but quite the opposite. And the last. Russia and the United States want to destroy Russia (I did not say that I did), with the help of home-grown liberals of all stripes. And yet: we are the people and who are you? hi
              1. -1
                2 June 2016 20: 50
                Quote: unsinkable
                Russia just does not refuse an open economy on equal terms. That is why Russia does not run away anywhere, does not refuse to fight, etc., but quite the contrary

                Please explain this not to me, but to the "smart" comrades from above. This time.
                Quote: unsinkable
                you very viciously called all the people naive and stupid.

                Secondly, Deliver me from these, the next unintelligible reproaches, there is no anger, everything is much simpler ... "Each vegetable has its own name" and the whole people should not be involved here.
                Quote: unsinkable
                . And lastly, they want to destroy Russia (I didn’t say I did) and the USA and the West with the help of home-grown liberals of all stripes

                They can destroy, but only with the help of home-grown idiots, or rather, it doesn’t matter what kind of ideological connotation ....
                Quote: unsinkable
                And again: we are the people, and who are you?

                Sorry, but this is an extremely stupid question, it’s even more stupid to answer it, in general, guess for yourself)))
              2. +3
                4 June 2016 14: 18
                Unsinkable, read carefully. Cosmos is not talking about people, but about stupid, EXCITED, (add from myself) couch patriots, or rather, pseudo-patriots. And here I completely agree with him. And one more thing: we are the people - who is this? Unsinkable?
                And by the way, are the superpatriots in no way annoyed by the fact that the same American expert teaches Russia?
            2. 0
              4 June 2016 14: 13
              Quote: SPACE
              Quote: Reserve officer
              “The goal of Russia should be complete isolation from the West, not integration into Western structures.

              Quote: Flinky
              And not just repeat, but engrave on a metal plate, which is nailed to Kudrin's nails on the forehead.

              Quote: SSI
              To the camp and let it engrave and mint for ten years ...


              And you thought it would be so easy to butt for the first place in the world, within the framework of the weapons proposed by the West, economic and informational? Naive people and stupid! Yes, at least get the disadvantages))) To abandon an open economy is the same as giving up fighting, struggles, frightening, fleeing, sieging, again isolating, which the West is seeking to deprive Russia of foreign markets and development. And it may still be too early to give up without a fight, we always have time to leave for a defensive defense. Moreover, in today's situation, this means leaving in even worse conditions than it was in the USSR, the USSR at least had a gigantic market and resources in the 15 of the Union republics and the CMEA camp. I repeat for the umpteenth time, as I am sure that Russia will not be destroyed by the United States and the West, not by the West American military prodigies, not by the government’s economic, temporarily necessary government bloc, and not by far distant, agitated, emotional patriots, as has already been repeatedly stories...

              Thank God, they finally explained to the stupid me that in all the problems that were, are and will be, only patriots are always to blame. But it turns out that I’ve always tried the wrong ones. Excuse me, Yeltsin, Dvorkovich, the State Department, Nabiullina, Siluanov, the CIA, Chubais, Kudrin and others. Bl ... I, maybe this is all well-conspired Russian patriots then?
              By the way, an open economy for whom, if they try to isolate us in everything?
              1. +1
                5 June 2016 12: 11
                Quote: vasiliev yu
                By the way, an open economy for whom, if they try to isolate us in everything?

                - so "in everything"?
                - Master Visas - Work?
                - SWIFT - works?
                - Have you introduced an embargo on oil and gas from the Russian Federation?
                - ... (continue the listing yourself)

                The so-called "sanctions" are child's play compared to a real economic war. Yes, no one is interested in it, in the real one. Incl. and in the rotten west ...

                Analyst, plin laughing
            3. +1
              5 June 2016 12: 06
              Quote: SPACE
              I will repeat for the hundredth time, as before I am sure that Russia will not destroy the United States and the West, not a West American military prodigy, not an economic, temporarily needed government bloc, and not far-fetched, over-excited, emotional patriots

              - plus one hundred good
              - now called (for the degree of overexcitation) - turbo patriots wink
          3. +5
            2 June 2016 21: 18
            As Academician Sergei Glazyev said in an interview yesterday: "The projects of Kudrin and Ulyukaev are exactly the same as the IMF memorandum on Russia from May of this year."

            So, what state do Kudrin and others like him work for?
        2. +2
          2 June 2016 16: 56
          Quote: Flinky
          And not just repeat, but engrave on a metal plate, which is nailed to Kudrin's nails on the forehead.

          Not with nails, but through the bolts and tighten on the back of the head ...))
      2. +22
        2 June 2016 16: 00
        The article is called "Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye" And that there is only one Kudrin? There is Gref, etc. liberals
        1. +3
          2 June 2016 19: 51
          Quote: ohtsistem
          there is only one Kudrin? There is a Gref, etc. liberals

          All this financial bloc (Kudrin, Gref, Nabiullina) must be replaced a long time ago by people who support Russia, and not the USA! Nationalize the Central Bank and get out of the control of the US Federal Reserve! It is necessary that our finances work for the Russian economy, and not strengthen the economies of the West and the USA.
          For this, the political will of the President and the Prime Minister is needed. I don’t see this yet.
        2. +1
          3 June 2016 01: 15
          Quote: ohtsistem
          The article is called "Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye" And that there is only one Kudrin? There is Gref, etc. liberals

          We know all these liberalists. Why mention them again? Ugh!
      3. +14
        2 June 2016 16: 07
        By the way, I can't even imagine why the hell Kudrin will be attached every time, not a single sensible thought he has, one panic (like "The boss is all gone, we will all die"), the friend correctly said in the comment, send him with suitcases, let him in Washington lectures, liberast.
        1. +7
          2 June 2016 16: 16
          Interestingly, as an assistant to economic policy of the US Treasury Secretary in the administration of Ronald Reagan, did he say that?
          In general, the last paragraph is good.
      4. +6
        2 June 2016 16: 37
        Quote: Reserve officer
        This is necessary for Kudrin to repeat separately. Three times.

        -----------------
        Dimon go doesn’t know either. He thinks iPhones in Santa Fe are doing, not in China.
      5. +11
        2 June 2016 17: 01
        Quote: Reserve officer
        "The goal of Russia should be complete isolation from the West, and not integration into Western structures. Such integration means for her becoming a vassal state."

        This is necessary for Kudrin to repeat separately. Three times.
        This can be repeated to Kudrin and other liberals at least 1000 times, but "integration into Western structures" at any cost has always been their dream, which they will never give up.
      6. +3
        2 June 2016 17: 18
        Quote: Reserve officer
        This is necessary for Kudrin separately repeat. Three times.

        Drive in the head!
        So it seems called ... wassat
        1. +1
          4 June 2016 10: 06

          I agree! But there is an old Russian proverb: "What a dick .... m is not invested - you can't hit it with a stick !!"
      7. +7
        2 June 2016 17: 40
        Full isolation will not work, but it was quite possible to suspend WTO membership for 5 years. Moreover, we won nothing from this membership. We need a targeted development program for the country, and the first step should be the construction of our own machine-tool industry, which was safely the first to be destroyed in the 90s. In parallel, to establish the design and production of lines of small and medium capacity with maximum robotization of processes. The first consumers could be agricultural producers, fast foods, polymer processing (plastic molding), builders (3D printers), the production of spare parts, the production of shoes, construction tools, household appliances and other things. Only by developing robotic systems we have a chance to catch up and fit into global trends.
      8. +1
        3 June 2016 01: 08
        Until Russia finds much more qualified economic advisers, the country's future remains vague and uncertain.
        Author, Paul Craig Roberts is an American economist, political and economic columnist. Cavalier of the Legion of Honor, Republican, former Economic Policy Assistant to the US Treasury Secretary in the Ronald Reagan Administration

        Well, as it were, there’s nothing to add.
    2. +17
      2 June 2016 16: 17
      Quote: wicked partisan
      In short, the conclusion is this: to send all the curls with things out, to send the penidos with the Eurogays in the direction of Naui, to raise their economists. so Yes. but first of all, Russia must be made a country of Engineers. then the devil himself will not be afraid of us.

      So, how, they removed drawing in school (how to develop spatial thinking), there was a rumor that they were going to introduce electronic notebooks so that children would stop writing (how to develop classics?) Of the children, it’s not only that the humanitarian students are molded, but it’s not clear what
    3. +7
      2 June 2016 16: 24
      Russia is a country of Engineers. then the devil himself will not be afraid of us.

      It's not about the "catch" ...
      "Here we have to CHANGE THE SYSTEM, I’ve rotten!" - the plumber answered Putin ...
      PS Already 4 years without: Kudrin, Gref's down-shifter, and ...
      "Life has become better, life has become more fun!"... ???
    4. +3
      2 June 2016 17: 55
      In short, the conclusion is this: to send all the curls with things out, to send the penidos with the Eurogays in the direction of Naui, to raise their economists.

      Today is Children's Day !! Let’s not even today to mow uncle and aunts of great age wassat belay with mental development as in toddlers !!!! laughing
    5. +3
      2 June 2016 18: 27
      Quote: wicked partisan
      In short, the conclusion is this: to send all the curls with things out, to send the penidos with the Eurogays in the direction of Naui, to raise their economists. so Yes. but first of all, Russia must be made a country of Engineers. then the devil himself will not be afraid of us.

      Close the preparatory courses under the roof of the pendos together with the Egori laboratory assistant fund. lol
      1. 0
        3 June 2016 00: 22
        Quote: Flinky
        And not just repeat, but engrave on a metal plate, which is nailed to Kudrin's nails on the forehead.
        I propose to cast in granite.
  2. +12
    2 June 2016 15: 54
    Can Russia resist Washington’s economic attack?
    Duc ... damn ... request
    We are already torn to shreds ... No !!! ??? laughing
    But what about the supreme, "exceptional" woman laughing
    He said that the Russian economy was already torn to pieces, now why attack something request
  3. +24
    2 June 2016 15: 54
    All right, I can’t even believe what the American wrote. Drive liberals from key positions, they are CIA agents.
  4. +12
    2 June 2016 15: 57
    Here, I completely agree with Paul Craig Roberts regarding our government and the Central Bank: - while the head of the Central Bank and the economic bloc of the government are the neoliberals of the Gaidar-Chubais spill, no positive changes in the economy and social sphere can be expected.
    One can only hope that the new composition of the State Duma will not support the course of the Medvedev government and will require the President to resign this government and radically change the neoliberal economic policy.
    1. +8
      2 June 2016 15: 59
      This Paul is not quite right - "The central bank and neoliberal economists are too naive and gullible." Economists from the Central Bank are not naive, by no means, there is another article of the Criminal Code laughing
  5. +1
    2 June 2016 15: 58
    "Modern monetary theory, associated with eminent economists like Michael Hudson, makes it clear that countries should finance their own infrastructure and make any productive investment, creating money, not debt."

    Even such a simple thought, in its essence a truism, makes the authors "outstanding economists." The idiocy cultivated in the West is boundless.
    1. +1
      2 June 2016 16: 58
      Quote: tiredwithall
      The idiocy cultivated in the West is unlimited.

      Yes, the state border of Russia is not a limit ...
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. SVD
    +11
    2 June 2016 16: 00
    Yes, it is extremely important for us to invest in production, not in pieces of paper! If something bad happens and you can’t feed the population with paper and you won’t protect your Homeland.
  8. +16
    2 June 2016 16: 01
    Russia can put only one cancer!
    This is a POTATO!
    1. +11
      2 June 2016 16: 08
      Quote: prabiz
      Russia can put only one cancer!
      This is a POTATO!
      1. +4
        2 June 2016 16: 28
        Quote: atalef
        Russia can put only one cancer!
        This is a POTATO!

        Those. carrots in Israel weed in a different position? And how, let me ask you? what Can you show? feel
        Hi spiteful! drinks
        1. +5
          2 June 2016 16: 35
          Quote: wicked partisan
          Quote: atalef
          Russia can put only one cancer!
          This is a POTATO!

          Those. carrots in Israel weed in a different position? And how, let me ask you? what Can you show? feel
          Hi spiteful! drinks

          Hello good partisan laughing
          Yuri, I’m neither a girl — in this pose I (if you see me) will be in nightmares for a long time, which will noticeably shorten your happy life
          I weed it in the super or in the market, but why its weeding? Every normal kid knows that markov grows on trees wink
          1. cap
            +5
            2 June 2016 16: 45
            Quote: atalef
            I weed it in the super or in the market, but why its weeding? Every normal kid knows that markovka grows on trees wink


            And everyone takes the money in the nightstand laughing
            1. +2
              2 June 2016 16: 49
              Quote: cap
              Quote: atalef
              I weed it in the super or in the market, but why its weeding? Every normal kid knows that markovka grows on trees wink


              And everyone takes the money in the nightstand laughing

              Cabbage - grows in the nightstand
          2. +2
            2 June 2016 17: 16
            Quote: atalef
            in such a pose I (if you see me) will long appear to you in nightmares
            what Somehow, or what?
            1. +4
              2 June 2016 17: 47
              Quote: wicked partisan
              Quote: atalef
              in such a pose I (if you see me) will long appear to you in nightmares
              what Somehow, or what?

              .e. carrots in Israel weed in a different position? And how, let me ask you?

              that’s how they weed it, from bomb bombs wassat
  9. +4
    2 June 2016 16: 03
    I don’t know, it seems that this Paul Craig himself is asking for advisers!
  10. +5
    2 June 2016 16: 08
    There was the Stalinist economy, the Victory economy. It's time to demonstrate the achievements of Puin's economy ... "otherwise they will crush"
  11. 0
    2 June 2016 16: 09
    Why not introduce sanctions against the usa
    1. +2
      2 June 2016 16: 22
      Do you have any concrete suggestions?
      1. -2
        2 June 2016 19: 38
        There is!!! Refusal from computer software and from the supply of components under the patronage of the United States. Everything!!! Enough for a start! THIS is like a US exit from missile defense unilaterally. Do you have a seven? Eight? Ten? And how much did you pay for it? OUR CAN ALL !!! And the production in Malaysia, and even in Vietnam, but to change the controllers (and this we can, the Chinese will only be happy to help) and so is smuggling. So the same deliveries of everything, only US claims are not accepted! So the sanctions are ready for sashikam.
        Our only bad thing is with the provision of these sanctions - aircraft carriers abeam Norfolk are not on duty and boats "K (namerek) are not on duty in the Gulf of Mexico ..." recourse
    2. +3
      2 June 2016 17: 03
      Quote: Diesel72
      Why not introduce sanctions against the usa

      They introduced it just now. They did not understand that Nadia was a sanction, ruthless and inevitable. A sanction that is not clear is always more dangerous. As you know who ordered you, you begin to work on lifting the sanction.
  12. +9
    2 June 2016 16: 14
    This idea has long been in the air_ the economic block nafig. put normal performers.
  13. +2
    2 June 2016 16: 14
    as long as the people have spirit, it is invincible. Russia has had worse times .. in bad times, people rally and consolidate. this is what is happening here.
  14. +4
    2 June 2016 16: 14
    In principle, the obvious things. They don’t see them in the Kremlin thanks to advisers?
  15. +3
    2 June 2016 16: 15
    former US Department of the Treasury Economic Policy Assistant
    As the "former", so sober thoughts are voiced, they begin to love Russia. I imagine the "former" McCain with a wheelbarrow of manure anywhere in the Saratov outback.
  16. +6
    2 June 2016 16: 16
    If Russia will allow the West to control its economy, it could give Washington control including over its armed forces. Unfortunately for the government and the Russian people, the Central Bank and neoliberal economists are too naive and trusting, to be able to defend Russia from the economic destabilization. As long as Russia does not find much more qualified economic advisers, the future of the country remains vague and uncertain.

    Not in the eyebrow, but in the eye! Aw, liberals. Are you reading this?
    1. +3
      2 June 2016 16: 32
      You are not addressing, in my opinion ...
      I think it is necessary so- Ay, Mr. President of the Russian Federation! Are you reading this?
  17. 0
    2 June 2016 16: 16
    It seems to me that Russia is on the "drum" of Western sanctions.
  18. +6
    2 June 2016 16: 18
    these economists are not naive and gullible but greedy and corrupt
    1. +1
      2 June 2016 19: 57
      Quote: basy66
      these economists are not naive and gullible but greedy and corrupt

      These economists, experts, advisers, as a rule, plow on one of the parties.
      The world is full of tools to circumvent any sanctions, if the goal is set for this. I am always amazed at these screams and articles in the media. They can’t buy a diesel engine, electronics, but this is all bullshit. So someone is lobbying directly for this diesel engine, machine, the company.
      But such personalities as Kudrin directly openly lobby for US interests and this is no longer a secret.
  19. +3
    2 June 2016 16: 28
    The old man is right, you need to be independent and self-sufficient. Fortunately, GDP understands this. And all the curls and others like them are the way out!
    1. +3
      2 June 2016 16: 37
      Understands that, but does nothing sensible!
      This is a great sadness.
      But time is running out.
  20. 0
    2 June 2016 16: 28
    We are only in favor of sanctions !!!
  21. cap
    +6
    2 June 2016 16: 29
    If Russia will allow the West to control its economy, it could give Washington control including over its armed forces. Unfortunately for the government and the Russian people, the Central Bank and neoliberal economists are too naive and trusting, to be able to defend Russia from the economic destabilization. As long as Russia does not find much more qualified economic advisers, the future of the country remains vague and uncertain.

    I can’t even believe that it was not written by our special services officers but a foreigner.
    Well, everything is known. Where are the countermeasures?
    By God, like children.

    Where is your spirit Joseph Vissarionovich?
    1. +2
      2 June 2016 16: 40
      Quote: cap


      Where is your spirit Joseph Vissarionovich?

    2. +2
      2 June 2016 16: 48
      You ++

      I would add tough responsibility for making economic decisions with reference to "surname, name and fatherland."
  22. +4
    2 June 2016 16: 37
    A sensible article. But the rulers of Russia vryatli read articles of this author, as they are full of ambition. Since they are not a third-party decree, they only remember people before the elections.
  23. cap
    +5
    2 June 2016 16: 40
    Well, you could.
    success
  24. +3
    2 June 2016 16: 40
    Although the enemy, and the matter speaks and it is necessary to listen. And as if the president did not resist (not the 37th year) and the cleaning should be carried out - they have matured, albeit not by such barbaric methods as then ....
  25. +3
    2 June 2016 16: 43
    Quote: Flinky
    And not just repeat, but engrave on a metal plate, which is nailed to Kudrin's nails on the forehead.

    Rusty nails, two-hundredth, and bend behind, so as not to remove. laughing
  26. +2
    2 June 2016 16: 55
    “Unfortunately for the government and the Russian people, the Central Bank and neoliberal economists are too naive and gullible to be able to protect Russia from economic destabilization. Until Russia finds much more qualified economic advisers, the country's future remains uncertain and uncertain. "
    Golden words spoken by an American with respect for Russia. And not a supporter of the policies pursued by Russia. But common sense compels him to tell our leaders what the worship of the Anglo-Saxons6 to which all our liberals are subject can lead! It is a pity that no one will hear him!
  27. -12
    2 June 2016 17: 02
    But we were already behind the Iron Curtain ... What did we get ... Uncontrolled communist slavery, bureaucracy and ineffective economy ... And then the collapse of the USSR, then the 90s. Now we have received "Putin's regime" ... What's next ... Approach to the Second Circle !? Thank you, don't! And that's what you need! Isolate your ideological enemy - the United States.
    1. +4
      2 June 2016 17: 53
      Learn the story, bitch ... w (son of a small dog)!
  28. +9
    2 June 2016 17: 38
    Quote: ans
    But we were already behind the Iron Curtain ... What did we get ... Uncontrolled communist slavery, bureaucracy and ineffective economy ... And then the collapse of the USSR, then the 90s. Now we have received "Putin's regime" ... What's next ... Approach to the Second Circle !? Thank you, don't! And that's what you need! Isolate your ideological enemy - the United States.


    "Uncontrolled communist slavery", "ineffective economy" - they went straight from the trump cards, hmm. How old are you? Have you read the history of Solzhenitsyn and Rezun?

    "Isolate your ideological enemy - the United States" - The United States is not our ideological enemy. To begin with, for this we need to have this very ideology, but it is absent from the word at all, even in the constitution it is spelled out, yeah. Here in the States there is, although not explicitly. And in our country, in essence, just following in the wake of the ideology of the States (just do not talk about the "national idea of ​​patriotism" and Orthodoxy, these are not ideologies by definition). And we have a conflict with them solely on the basis of dough, resources and geopolitics. And there is no other background. The Union had an ideological conflict with the United States, and the loot was there for the second time. And we have capitalism now, and under it everything is just like that, except for the dough.
  29. +1
    2 June 2016 17: 42
    Quote: KRIG55
    no matter how the president does not resist (not the 37th year) and the cleaning should be done - they have matured, albeit not using such barbaric methods as then ....

    The purge is going on, only very slowly: today another mayor has been "put in." Only now a "special troika" has not been created for such people, again "for services to the Fatherland" will get off with a conditionally exclusive (for the chosen) punishment.
  30. +4
    2 June 2016 17: 47
    All this is good that the author wrote there, but you still need to stop believing in fairy tales and finally understand that the Russian Federation is controlled by large financial capital, it has no homeland, the word patriotism is not familiar there and the country's interests are secondary to it. He does not care who will lead the country, it is important how much will be the rate of profit. Doubters can look at our blue neighbors from the yellow house. Capital there feels great. For him, all this turmoil and civil war is not cold, not hot, but rather an occasion to fish in troubled waters. Here in Russia it will be the same if the government continues to take into account only the interests of big capital. Capital doesn’t care who will be up there, GDP, Medvedev, Kudrin, Navalny. The latter will be even better, because it has no brakes at all.
  31. +1
    2 June 2016 18: 14
    He sang beautifully "Vasily Alibabaevich - don't go here, you go there, otherwise the snow will fall head off, you will be completely dead" / Gentlemen of Fortune x / f /. A strange situation, the sanctions were introduced but the trade with the regional committee increased / GDP is a straight line in 2015 / that is, it turns out to be a scam for our senile gayrope. The conclusion is that they hung on everyone and everything, the main thing is profit and money, and we have a dime a dozen of such advisers, led by the notorious Kudrin.
  32. +2
    2 June 2016 19: 13
    Quote: Angry Guerrilla
    but first of all, Russia must be made a country of Engineers. then hell will not be afraid of us

    I hope you are certainly an engineer. And do not read books, except reference books. And do not go to the cinema or watch. And your children and relatives too.
    Russia must be made a country where people live comfortably and want to. Then everything else will be both physicists and lyrics.
  33. +3
    2 June 2016 19: 24
    First of all, you need to return to the Soviet education system! Abandon the USE, teach young people to read, write and think! In the meantime, we have only a few smart guys in the TV program "Clever and Clever". The rest of the mass of ignoramuses ... And in the eyes only $$$! They don't know who Zhukov is! Shame!
  34. +3
    2 June 2016 19: 37
    Dear, what do you agree with? Are you not ashamed that this is stated by an American, not our native economist? He described our condition well, but Russia alone will decide with whom to develop, if the West agrees and will supply technology, place production on our site territories (not to be confused with assembly, namely, the full technological cycle), so why don’t we cooperate with them, the same with China and India, any other country. Please note that the article came out just when the EU thinks (and on my own, without the United States) on the lifting of sanctions. Personally, I am for a very cautious approach to lifting the sanctions, to disassemble each item, each company and be sure to benefit, if you want by surgical means, by agricultural means not any cancellations, on the contrary tightening
  35. 0
    2 June 2016 21: 31
    The author is a big plus! For a long time there were such thoughts, but there was no talent to present them like that! hi
  36. 0
    2 June 2016 21: 39
    Interestingly, will the STGA itself survive in the event of an economic and propaganda attack by Russia?
  37. 0
    2 June 2016 22: 14
    good article. To the author plus. All right!
  38. 0
    2 June 2016 22: 39
    Russia has developed a good immunity to counter Western sanctions and this immunity continues to develop.
    In general, every action has an equal and opposite opposition. This is the law of nature. Whatever one may say, there’s no getting away from him.
    1. +1
      2 June 2016 23: 15
      Speak immunity, today Rospotrebnadzor has allowed the purchase of raw materials for baby food, in particular the meat, in spite of the sanctions, here is the immunity, and what was shouting about food security then, for the same meat, what kind of deflections?
  39. 0
    2 June 2016 22: 59
    Have you read the post and regalia of the author ?! It was he who led our "perestroika"! And now he gives advice! You have to think with your head! No other economists are yet to be seen here! This will have to immediately raise, as much as we would not want to return Stalin, the USSR!
  40. +2
    2 June 2016 23: 35
    You just need to know that Paul Craig Roberts is a well-known conspiracy theorist (in my
    look, completely insane type). 30 years ago in the Reagan government he
    he pursued the opposite economic policy, the one that he preaches
    today.
  41. +3
    3 June 2016 00: 35
    Will it resist? A belated question, I have already resisted. For the third year they have been pressing sanctions, oil has been kept at a low level, burying its own shale revolution, falling out with the Saudis and cheating on an extra million barrels of production every day (not to mention the murky "oil reserves in the United States." The European Union in general, France and Germany in particular They were unable to win over China to their side, after which they declared it the main threat along with Russia and ISIS.
    How many were thrown into the fifth and sixth columns, how they both discredited themselves both inside the country and abroad, but still there is no German. The "Putin regime" is not falling, Russia is not returning its Crimea, Europe is starting to worry seriously, Asia as a whole has scored on these sanctions ...
    But only the United States, distracted by the game of elections and putting together anti-Russian and anti-Chinese fronts (there is also an anti-Assad front - but there are seams there), is rapidly approaching the collapse of its financial system, and pension funds for sure - and no one will seem little, but a saving (for America) war in Europe it will not be possible to untie for free this time, Europe is NATO (through the efforts of the Americans, almost completely), and NATO is the United States, and this means that the main NATO country is the first to risk and taste all the "goodies".
    Accordingly, the States themselves will have to rake their economic and political jamb over the dollar bubble, and the collapse of the United States as a single state is the most humane way to solve it.
  42. 0
    3 June 2016 05: 34
    That's even amerikos understands what needs to be done and how to act. Only our liberal marginal government, which everyone hates like mad dogs, doesn't know a damn thing!
    Amerikos literally says that it bent under the mattress and sucks, building its eyes.
    Ugh!
  43. 0
    4 June 2016 10: 45
    Yes, generally correct. But in order for the course to change completely, there must be a change in consciousness in wide layers, from elites to everyone. And it is necessary to overcome the obvious wrecking, in those structures that are not numerous in percentage terms but are located in strategic directions.
    Without the first, a revolution in public consciousness, and the second is impossible.
  44. 0
    4 June 2016 11: 04
    If Russia will allow the West to control its economy, it could give Washington control including over its armed forces. Unfortunately for the government and the Russian people, the Central Bank and neoliberal economists are too naive and trusting, to be able to defend Russia from the economic destabilization. As long as Russia does not find much more qualified economic advisers, the future of the country remains vague and uncertain.
    Author Author, Paul Craig Roberts is an American economist, political and economic columnist. Cavalier of the Legion of Honor, Republican, former Assistant Economic Policy Secretary of the US Treasury in the administration of Ronald Reagan


    paradoxically, but today Russia has a tremendous chance to survive any economic attacks. As an airship, Russia has ballast in the form of a liberal government and other comprador economists. Dropping this ballast is also no problem, because there are economists and patriots of Russia. It all depends on the willful decision of a single person. That's how he gets tired of playing liberals. So our airship and trample. But the Americans with geyropetsami no such ballast. They already have nothing to dump. And they cannot even develop stolen goods.
  45. 0
    4 June 2016 13: 29
    reputational risks? did you look at yourself in the mirror? a nation of killers and robbers, singing about a reputation,.
  46. 0
    4 June 2016 15: 48
    Quote: SPACE
    Abandoning an open economy is the same as abandoning a fight, a fight, scrambling, fleeing, going into a siege, again in isolation, which, in general, the West is seeking to deprive Russia of foreign markets and development.

    Not under siege. We have already made a market out of us, from Polish apples (they rot their own) to software systems. They put him like a dog on a hard collar and a short leash. What is the fight?
    It is necessary to develop your own. We can fight and capture markets, no worse than I probably know how much grain the USSR imported, and remember Bush’s legs. Of course, politics should be flexible, but we not only can, but must also raise the country.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-BRO5xnP8M
  47. 0
    4 June 2016 21: 32
    Much more interesting is the question why the country's leadership is not concerned with finding more effective economists? What kind of irreplaceability? Let the current "luminaries" sit in the basements of the Lubyanka for a week or two ..., think ... maybe they will tell something interesting ... well, or repent ...
  48. 0
    5 June 2016 11: 51
    Bravo! After this article, my hatred of Kudrins and other Grefs became even more established!