Tests of the new CP-10 aircraft in Kubinka

142
At the Kubinka airbase, tests of the CP-10 aircraft began, reports Rossiyskaya Gazeta.

Tests of the new CP-10 aircraft in Kubinka


The abbreviation in the name of the aircraft is deciphered as follows: "a jet aircraft with a sweep of the wing –10 degrees." It was developed by the Moscow Design Bureau aviation technologies".

According to the developers, “reverse sweep allows you to make the plane compact and improves stability at low speeds, which makes the CP-10 suitable for teaching the basics of piloting.”

“The Yak-130 combat training enrolled in the air force is, in fact, an advanced training aircraft, and there are no simple and cheap jet machines for obtaining initial skills in Russia. The cadets are engaged in outdated and much heavier L-39, ”said the CB representative.

According to him, “the CP-10 flight hour cost is almost four times less than that of the Yak-130: 2500 dollars versus 8000, and in terms of training efficiency, it exceeds the X-NUMX percent L-10”.



In the red-colored video, the CP-10 performs a standard exercise for fighters: landing on the lane, followed by take-off. Earlier, the plane made flights from the airfield Oreshkino (Kaluga region).

The aircraft is equipped with AI-25TLSh turbojet dual-flow engine and K-93 ejection seats.
  • http://www.kb-sat.ru
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

142 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +86
    30 May 2016 18: 05
    Beautiful thing. It was previously shown on TV as an example of private design and manufacturing. Such private is welcome. Especially if they were canceled VAT, and not to oil exporters.
    1. +42
      30 May 2016 18: 31
      Will we bring this aircraft to production in series? Many pilots will be very happy. Instead of the Czech L-39 will be a great car. Good luck to you .
      1. +23
        30 May 2016 19: 32
        Quote: captain
        Many pilots will be very happy. Instead, the Czech L-39 will be a great car.

        And again with the Kokhlov pikhl. "Motor Sich", Zaporozhye (clickable) ...
        1. +32
          30 May 2016 20: 06
          Quote: zennon
          And again with the Kokhlov pikhl. "Motor Sich", Zaporozhye (clickable) ...

          Permitted for a prototype. For the Yak-130, too, at first there were Ukrainian engines, and now Salyut makes them.
          1. +1
            30 May 2016 20: 49
            Quote: Gray Brother
            Permitted for a prototype. For the Yak-130, too, at first there were Ukrainian engines, and now Salyut makes them.

            This is what they will take for the SR-10 instead of the Kakhlovsky one? AL-55 ?! So "Salyut" does not make it. They developed it for India with their money and their production will begin at Mowgli.
            Designed for the training aircraft HJT-36 developed by Hindustan Aeronautics Corporation (India). The main development work was completed in August 2010. In India, the organization of licensed production of AL-55I is being carried out; before the start of production, small batches of engines for the HJT-36 are purchased from NPO Saturn. The engine was created with funding from India.
            On February 19, 2015, the head of the United Engine Corporation (UEC, part of Rostec) Vladislav Masalov announced that the production of Russian AL-55I engines for HJT-36 Indian training aircraft is planned to begin in India in 2016.

            At present, Salyut has no specific plans to launch production of the AL-55 in Russia.
            1. +6
              31 May 2016 11: 34
              I think if serious departments are included in their plans, then engine production will not be a problem.
        2. +7
          30 May 2016 20: 35
          Quote: zennon
          And again with the Kokhlov pikhl. "Motor Sich", Zaporozhye (clickable) ...

          -----------------
          Well, in this size of the aircraft will find other analogues of engines (Canadian, Brazilian, Chinese, some more). But you still need to make such beauty.
          1. +6
            31 May 2016 14: 19
            Quote: Altona
            Quote: zennon
            And again with the Kokhlov pikhl. "Motor Sich", Zaporozhye (clickable) ...

            -----------------
            Well, in this size of the aircraft will find other analogues of engines (Canadian, Brazilian, Chinese, some more). But you still need to make such beauty.

            Stalin urgently needs to be taught to make the entire line of his engines.
          2. 0
            1 June 2016 23: 13
            Quote: Altona
            Well, in this size of the aircraft will find other analogues of engines (Canadian, Brazilian, Chinese



            Have come ...
        3. +2
          30 May 2016 21: 05
          Quote: zennon
          Quote: captain
          Many pilots will be very happy. Instead, the Czech L-39 will be a great car.

          And again with the Kokhlov pikhl. "Motor Sich", Zaporozhye (clickable) ...

          Power point,
          type / number x power., kgf
          Turbojet engine
          1 x 1750The first prototypes of the aircraft are equipped with a AI-25TSR dual-circuit turbojet engine with a thrust of 1750 kgf designed by the Zaporizhzhya Engineering Design Bureau Progress named after Academician A.G. Ivchenko
        4. +3
          31 May 2016 17: 12
          There is nothing to be done ... While flying on these engines. If it comes to the series! And then, after all, our bureaucrats will cover up any good deed! Here only the voice of GDP can help!
        5. +1
          1 June 2016 16: 57
          Quote: zennon
          And again with the Kokhlov pikhl. "Motor Sich", Zaporozhye (clickable) ...

          Well, our NK-25 or NK-32 will not fit in it.
        6. 0
          1 June 2016 20: 07
          Quote: zennon
          And again with the Kokhlov pikhl. "Motor Sich", Zaporozhye (clickable) ...

          So first you need to put your own engine, and only then deliver cadets for training.
    2. +2
      30 May 2016 19: 18
      And they gave money to advance in life. Show performance characteristics! Did not see. I didn’t read ... Well, I really want to ...
      1. +10
        30 May 2016 20: 54
        Quote: fire nick
        Show performance characteristics! Did not see. I didn’t read ... Well, I really want to ...

        Let's take a look at the "Wiki":
        Flight performance
        Basic LHT UTS SR-10
        Power point,
        type / number x power., kgf
        Turbojet engine
        X 1 1750
        Crew location
        tandem
        Max. take-off weight kg
        3100
        Max. speed km / h
        800
        Practical ceiling, m
        11 000
        Practical range, km
        1200
        Max. operational overload, units
        + 8 / -6
        Landing speed, km / h
        180
        What is rich ...
  2. +2
    30 May 2016 18: 07
    It seems that Albatros was just going to be replaced by the Yak-130, now a training training? but what about unification.
    1. FID
      +15
      30 May 2016 18: 10
      Quote: 3officer
      It seems that Albatross was just going to replace the Yak-130

      So, Albatross is back in service. Recently, one of the bosses boasted that the cadets again began to fly on Elki ...
      1. +3
        30 May 2016 18: 15
        Well, they know better, of course, but why a huge fleet of training aircraft duplicating each other is incomprehensible honestly. what
        1. +11
          30 May 2016 18: 19
          But why do you need a fleet of equipment manufactured by a NATO member country?
        2. +5
          31 May 2016 11: 38
          training aircraft also have a specialization
          Yak-130 is a plane that teaches to use modern equipment of a fighter-bomber. This is too fat for a simple training aircraft.
          therefore, there is a niche for such a machine and the task is to fill it.
          1. 0
            2 June 2016 08: 58
            Forgot to add: 130th is a masterpiece of its kind. It hurts a lot of people, not as a combat training, but as a combat simple. For the currency. In our difficult times.
      2. +29
        30 May 2016 22: 56
        Krasnodar flight, now his wife’s nephew flies on the Elks. Says a school desk. Well, in my opinion, give him a kite and he will fly on it like a Su-35. A guy from 10 years old raved about the sky. That dream came true. They laughed at him: If you don’t pay your salary, you will leave the aircraft? He says even if it will be necessary to pay extra for flights, I will still fly.
      3. -2
        31 May 2016 09: 21
        Moreover, it was served as an achievement.
    2. +17
      30 May 2016 18: 38
      Quote: 3officer
      It seems that Albatross was just going to replace the Yak-130



      It has already been written more than once that the Yak-130 is complicated for young, just beginning pilots ...

      What excites me most is that the engine is not ours, not of Russian production ...
      1. FID
        +6
        30 May 2016 18: 48
        Quote: weksha50
        What excites me the most is that the engine is not ours, not of Russian production ..

        If you are about 130th, then he has 2 of them (two Zaporizhzhya motors) ...
        1. +14
          30 May 2016 18: 58
          Quote: weksha50
          What excites me most is that the engine is not ours, not of Russian production ...

          ... a used engine for the first tests, at the moment the CP-10 is considered a prototype ... well, like AI-222-25 ... there will be unification of the engine with the Yak-130 ... hi
          Quote: SSI
          If you are about 130th, then he has 2 of them (two Zaporizhzhya motors) ...

          ... already Russian since 2015 Moscow "Salute" completely without Ukrainian components ... hi
          1. +10
            30 May 2016 19: 29
            And this is a completely different story. Khokhlyatsky plant is a pity, but its own shirt ... And it is desirable that our motors forever and everywhere! And kakly let them amer sell their. Maybe even instead of RD-180 will adapt lol what
            1. +5
              31 May 2016 11: 47
              Quote: fire nick
              Khokhlyatsk plant is sorry, but own shirt

              At one time, the leadership of the USSR made a mistake. On the one hand, it developed Ukraine in every possible way by cutting the budgets of other republics, especially the RSFSR, on the other, it did not remove the roots of separatism, and on the third, under Khrushchev Ukraine gained completely undeserved authority, historical records, as well as territorial acquisitions, and then collusion under Yeltsin completed the picture.
              In general, I am against the behavior of Moscow when it concentrates everything important nearby, and the regions can only be surprised at the collection of taxes in Moscow from their enterprises, however, cooperation with Ukraine is now destructive. The more production elements will be replaced from Ukrainian to ours (without sacrificing quality), the better.
              1. 0
                2 June 2016 09: 06
                Alas. The most important resource is trained people. Where can you find engine builders in an open field to quickly? So it is near Moscow, near Rostov, near Nizhny. We again do not have enough time to do well, because again we need to do it quickly. And about the radical de-Ukrainianization in 40-50-60 you are right. No "Govoryt Kyeu ..." on the radio, no alphabets with "i", no document circulation in mov, nowhere, in the Western region - in the first place. You look - it would dissolve.
          2. +3
            30 May 2016 20: 36
            Quote: Inok10
            ... used engine for the first tests, at the moment the CP-10 is considered a prototype ... well, like AI-222-25

            AB-222-25 also "Motor Sich" rivets request
            1. +10
              31 May 2016 11: 04
              For 70 years, the Soviet government has been trying to make more proletarians in Ukraine in order to strengthen the Soviet power by building hydroelectric power stations there, factories for assembling all that is possible, an electronics cluster, but everything turned out to be in vain.
              Farmer's narrow-mindedness always defeated civilization; the first alarm bell (even a bell) sounded in Chernobyl as a symbol of the victory of the feudal worldview over common sense and science. Conclusions were made, but in vain. Blind faith that you do not need to learn anything was and is an immunity. The result was the gradual destruction of all high-tech industries from computers, aircraft, mechanical engineering, instruments, rockets, ships to common cars. The country was oriented toward consumption, only no one thought what to pay.
        2. +1
          30 May 2016 19: 21
          Are they still alive? If so, then glad. Not for Ukrainians, for the plant. But it’s time to make room in this industry already.
        3. 0
          30 May 2016 21: 47
          Quote: SSI
          If you are about 130th, then he has 2 of them (two Zaporizhzhya motors) ...



          And about the 130th, and about the SR-10 ....
      2. 0
        30 May 2016 21: 19
        It has already been written more than once that the Yak-130 is complicated for young, just beginning pilots ...


        And in the Yak-130 brochures it seems that he is easy to pilot and write a lot forgiveness.

        The airplane is beautiful. I’m more embarrassed by something else, recently they wrote in the article in the VO that the cadets' initial flight training begins ... from the end of the 3rd year. Is it normal that they are more than half the term of study and don’t fly then?
        1. +8
          30 May 2016 23: 40
          Normally, in general, among other things, they should receive an education. third-year students have been flying since mid-April, my second year student, he says they will be scattered across the shelves in September, and by December they should be on the wing. In Ulyanovsk, civilians, so they generally only begin to fly in their fifth year
          1. +5
            31 May 2016 01: 52
            Normally, in general, among other things, they should receive an education.


            Fine ? But what about the USSR? CHVVAUL- from the first course (well, civilly, from the second semester) from spring to autumn? 2 years - elki, 2 years - MiG-23? What else is there to learn for 2 years? Or the alphabet with the multiplication table ... with the exam, perhaps, I won’t be surprised. laughing Everything is simpler, I'm afraid. No money, no resource, no flights.
            1. 0
              31 May 2016 20: 32
              This is what I wanted to hear, how they cooked before, how they cook at the "partners". It turns out that the training system has been completely destroyed? now it is necessary to reanimate.
        2. +1
          31 May 2016 11: 51
          they are not WW2 pilots who depend only on tactics and skills
          Now you need a lot of knowledge, both theoretical and applied. Knowledge of equipment.
          And aerobatics only later. In other matters, the fact that civilians fly only from the 5th year in Ulyanovsk is also bad. Aerobatics is not necessary for them to master, but there are many specific skills that are needed. One navigational training is worth it.
          1. +1
            31 May 2016 20: 30
            Knowledge is knowledge and skills are skills. Why can’t you develop skills starting from the first course in parallel with obtaining knowledge? ... well, of course, apart from the fact that there is nothing to get them ...
            1. 0
              2 June 2016 15: 44
              They will still be engineers. In addition to piloting skills, they should gain knowledge on the compromising information, the theory of parts and machines, higher mathematics, and so on and so on ... Training preparation again. This is all a lot of time. And besides, as I understand it, the school’s airfield cannot provide such an intensity of flights, especially since the guys will all master different types of planes — it’s only on the wing that they become on albatrosses, and then their paths diverge. So they parted on the shelves
    3. 0
      31 May 2016 04: 31
      This is a different class of machine.
  3. +8
    30 May 2016 18: 08
    Like it! That's it! I'm starting to save on a plane!
    1. +10
      30 May 2016 20: 04
      Quote: devis
      ! Start saving up for a plane!

      Yeah, a similar case on my collective farm. I’m afraid that the piggy bank will crack. laughing
    2. +4
      30 May 2016 23: 45
      Buy your Yak55 (54). they are ready, standing at the factory in Arsenyev, waiting for the buyer. Last summer, the price tag was around 5,5 million.
      1. 0
        31 May 2016 12: 14
        for a frame with a motor (this is exactly what the Yak-55 looks like to me) 5.5 million?
        not expensive?
        ps
        I’ve calculated a little for comparison, with some errors, a bf-109G6 of 43 years old for the ruble exchange rate in early May 2016 would cost about 20 million rubles
        1. +1
          31 May 2016 14: 44
          Frame with a motor ??? Excuse me, this is a great sports aircraft. And 5,5 million is prohibitively expensive for me, otherwise I would love to buy it, for my son, I myself have been afraid of heights for some time now.
          1. +1
            1 June 2016 00: 26
            Take a look at Zenith
            http://www.zenithair.com/stolch750/750-price.html
            I’ll have to collect it myself (it will take a month).
            1. 0
              2 June 2016 14: 32
              It’s cool, although it’s prohibitive for me (but already more real), but with certification, how? here, after all, it will have to be not only assembled but also issued.
              1. 0
                2 June 2016 15: 26
                He has a certificate. Russian why? Not intended for passenger traffic. Get only registration number. In the states, in order to obtain a pilot license for such aircraft, one must study at 20-hour courses.
        2. 0
          2 June 2016 14: 34
          Yes, you are just an accountant. For what minus, I did not understand. set himself plus for the amendment
          1. 0
            2 June 2016 15: 27
            Do not mind it. Likes do not interest me.
            1. 0
              2 June 2016 16: 02
              Quote: Alex_Tug
              He has a certificate. Russian why? Not intended for passenger traffic. Get only registration number. In the states, in order to obtain a pilot license for such aircraft, one must study at 20-hour courses.

              In general, I have very little English, does this come out to about 20000 just a set of parts? In addition, what kind of whales will you have to purchase for assembly (and with these whales, at least do a series)?
              1. 0
                2 June 2016 16: 48
                The minimum flying kit is 14000. (This is with the engine).
                In principle, this is like a Lego constructor. You can buy and assemble the required set of parts. In principle, you can put another engine. Whales are already a bunch of different devices and different gadgets. You can buy at least 100 sets. Unless buyers have to look. Then you probably need an instructor with a license for training. How a business model can actually work. There are more than one aircraft model in the line.
                1. 0
                  2 June 2016 17: 41
                  Yeah, I'm going to wipe my saliva
                  1. 0
                    2 June 2016 20: 50
                    Watch videos with different devices.
                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dn3oCvHZs0Q
                    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Emuub4qC8Bo
  4. +4
    30 May 2016 18: 09
    A small plane has a great future. The most important thing is that every take-off ends with landing !!!
  5. +1
    30 May 2016 18: 09
    It seemed to me, or is it really: when you plant it a little "goat"? Takeoff is fine, short takeoff run, but the landing is uncertain. I'm not a specialist and I can be wrong.
    1. wow
      +4
      30 May 2016 19: 02
      The aircraft is very light, it is difficult to smoothly "rub" it to the runway.
      1. 0
        2 June 2016 14: 43
        What then can be said about the three-hundred-kilogram technology P2000? then, in general, can’t you rub it into the strip?
    2. +1
      30 May 2016 19: 47
      I think the strip is to blame.
      1. +1
        31 May 2016 10: 13
        Quote: NordUral
        I think the strip is to blame.

        Of course, Putin is to blame! wassat

        Guys, I reviewed the second landing three times ... in what language are negotiations with the dispatcher being conducted?
  6. 0
    30 May 2016 18: 10
    Okay, keep it up. And there you look and trample on export to African-Asian countries because of cheapness. The right way is, longer sanctions would be preserved.
  7. +3
    30 May 2016 18: 11
    Not bad at all. Simple and cheap jet machines for acquiring initial skills in Russia no. Well then, they will now, although it was necessary yesterday. Clear sky car!
  8. -2
    30 May 2016 18: 12
    Heh, but where are they going to take the AI-25TLSh engines, Motor Sich is living out its last days, at the same time it is stubbornly killing itself against the wall of its own "sanctions" ...

    Yes, and 1 engine on the training machine - and if the failure? On two, the yellowhorn still has a chance, but here xs ...
    1. +5
      30 May 2016 18: 24
      Well, "Motor Sich" is not living out its last days, let's be realistic. While they have orders for both new and repaired engines. It's time to stop waiting for everything to shut down. Such countries live for decades in the process of half-life.
      Quote: megafair
      Heh, but where are they going to take the AI-25TLSh engines, Motor Sich is living out its last days, at the same time it is stubbornly killing itself against the wall of its own "sanctions" ...

      Yes, and 1 engine on the training machine - and if the failure? On two, the yellowhorn still has a chance, but here xs ...
      1. +6
        30 May 2016 18: 38
        Yeah, Yuzhmash is already standing, Motor Sich incurs losses for the third year in a row ... It doesn’t make me happy, it’s a shame, such an enterprise (they built the whole union), I’m worried that the engines on the CP-3 are those that soon and no one will be able to release ...
        But I read on the network - they plan to put them on our Ufa AL-55 in the future.
    2. +2
      30 May 2016 23: 51
      For this seat ejection is. and the yellowhorns could cope with one, but with the failure of one of the two, it will not be easier for them.
      there is actually AI25, it's almost like AK
  9. +5
    30 May 2016 18: 12
    He says a lot! Can DOSAAF be revived soon? It would not hurt!
    1. +2
      31 May 2016 07: 49
      To revive? You just need to take under the wing those flying clubs that are and that barely flounder. I assure you, and there will be enough instructors and attendants. If the state takes at least half of the necessary expenses on maintenance and maintenance of equipment, there will already be a sharp rise
  10. +3
    30 May 2016 18: 15
    Is the industry awake? As the hero of the film "When the trees were big" said: "They remember their hands. They remember!"
    1. +1
      31 May 2016 11: 05
      Well, if at least we do not interfere much, then we will rise. I read somewhere that the economy is such a thing that can’t grow if you don’t kill it.
    2. 0
      1 June 2016 23: 58
      1536 RU May 30, 2016 18:15
      Has industry woken up?


      The airplane was built in Dagestan. Some nito aircraft repair, nito aircraft factory, than harnessed to die without orders harnessed - and built!

      (source - forgot! request some Dagestan site)
  11. +4
    30 May 2016 18: 15
    Attorney General felon, Pahan drunk and half the country on a parasail ...
    1. +11
      30 May 2016 18: 29
      Quote: avg-mgn
      the prosecutor general from among the criminals, pahan drunk, and the country on a parasail

      You, in my opinion, got a branch.
  12. +1
    30 May 2016 18: 25
    On the basis of one hundred and thirty, make an easy attack aircraft, and use this bird just as a training one.
    1. +1
      30 May 2016 21: 28
      Why does the army need such an attack aircraft? Is it better to restore the production of SU-25? Or what a modernized project based on it.
      1. +1
        31 May 2016 12: 35
        Su-25 needs a serious revision of the concept. The machine was created to support the masses of troops on the scale of the Warsaw Pact, but times have changed and technology has also changed, and the requirements for attack aircraft have also changed. We need to continue to stamp the modernization of the Su25m, su25m2 ... su25m99 and prepare a brand new car. In my opinion, now there is no point in too much speed of the aircraft. This potential can be used for other characteristics, first of all, to rethink the combat survivability of the aircraft.
        1. 0
          31 May 2016 20: 46
          I do not argue that it is necessary to develop new ones and modernize existing ones. In Syria, the SU-25 is not at all the troops of the Warsaw Pact who support it. And in terms of combat survivability, he is supposed to give a head start on YAK-130 ..
  13. +8
    30 May 2016 18: 35
    Quote: mordvin xnumx
    Quote: avg-mgn
    the prosecutor general from among the criminals, pahan drunk, and the country on a parasail

    You, in my opinion, got a branch.

    I apologize to the community, the machine crashed, pulled out of RAM and stuck the window in the wrong place. Sorry wildly!
  14. +2
    30 May 2016 18: 37
    And the engine is the Sich engine, where would it be without him. And how will such an aircraft be produced for the army?
    1. -1
      30 May 2016 19: 14
      They plan to put on them our Ufa AL-55.
  15. +1
    30 May 2016 18: 39
    The plane may be quite good, although it is too early to speak before the end of the tests. But the AI-25TLSh engine is Motor Sich. My own, as I understand, was not found. Will it not turn out that tomorrow this button accordion will have nowhere to attach? Or is everything good with Ukraine?
    1. 0
      30 May 2016 19: 14
      I wrote about the same a little earlier:
      But I read on the network - they plan to put them on our Ufa AL-55 in the future.
      1. 0
        30 May 2016 20: 50
        Quote: megafair
        plan to put our Ufa AL-55.

        What do not immediately put? You have to understand, is there a problem?
    2. +5
      30 May 2016 22: 28
      Please do not confuse Ukraine and Motor Sich. There will be no Ukraine tomorrow, but the plant will remain if it survives. With all these bans on the part of Kiev, workers are sitting without work anyway.
      1. +2
        31 May 2016 14: 24
        Quote: Orionvit
        Please do not confuse Ukraine and Motor Sich. There will be no Ukraine tomorrow, but the plant will remain if it survives.

        Your words to God in the ears ...
  16. +2
    30 May 2016 18: 46
    A flying school desk is needed, and young romantics, too.
  17. +2
    30 May 2016 18: 46
    How cute! Probably I won't be mistaken if this is the first production aircraft with a forward-swept wing (if it reaches the series). Landing speed is very low, if anything, and without an engine sits down. We need motors for a large series - Russia will decide with motors too. PD -14 mastered, let alone such "small things".
  18. +3
    30 May 2016 18: 47
    “The cost of an SR-10 flight hour is almost four times less than that of a Yak-130: $ 2500 versus $ 8000. Lope? belay belay belay What does the author smoke?
    1. Dam
      0
      30 May 2016 18: 50
      Keyword: almost
    2. +1
      31 May 2016 01: 04
      Why is the cost of flying our aircraft in dollars? Is flying to Alaska refuel?
  19. -3
    30 May 2016 18: 51
    It’s similar to Yak. But why muddle with the sweep of the wing, I thought the Su-47 “Golden Eagle” had already demonstrated its incapacity, and they won’t return to such a scheme
    1. +19
      30 May 2016 19: 25
      Well here is a little different:
      Firstly, the reverse sweep of the wing has no end disruptions, and, therefore, its lift is higher. Secondly, flow stall at large angles of attack at such a wing occurs first in the root of the wing, without disrupting the ailerons, leaving the aircraft controlled.
      Secondly, the reverse sweep wing improves anti-tearing characteristics, and generally works great at large angles of attack, what is its attractiveness.
      Thirdly, the Su-47 began to have problems at supersonic speeds, the KOS twisted, which is not fundamental for the RS-10, as a flying desk - he will not know these problems;)
      1. +1
        31 May 2016 12: 50
        Quote: megafair

        Thirdly, the Su-47 problems began to arise at supersonic speeds, there was a twisting

        as far as people from Sukhoi say, they solved this problem to the level that simply the resource of the wing was many times less, which increased the cost of operation.
    2. 0
      30 May 2016 21: 31
      It is similar to Yak in that the training and cockpit for 2 pilots on such a baby looks disproportionately large.
    3. +1
      31 May 2016 12: 48
      and what was the Su-47 incapable of? laughing
      oh, this is a new generation for me, which argues through a loser / successful filter.
      "If the Su-47 did not go into production, then, therefore, a loser. And if a loser, then there is why."
      Here is such a dumb logical chain.
      Don’t read further, because your brain will burn out due to tearing up the information pattern.
      Su-47 fully met the expectations of the creators - repeated all the characteristics. Both positive and negative. The main reason for abandoning him and his scheme was that the main advantages of reverse sweep turned out to be unnecessary when a controlled thrust vector appeared on the engine nozzle.
      But, there is no controlled thrust vector on the training aircraft. And the question arises that the use of such a wing is appropriate. So what is the main plus wing of the reverse sweep?
      In the absence of stall. For a training aircraft, very valuable quality.
      1. 0
        1 June 2016 17: 28
        Quote: yehat
        The main cause of failure ...

        this is not true.

        megafair wrote
  20. +4
    30 May 2016 18: 53
    And here are the dollars per hour of operation? Are we Yankees?
    1. 0
      31 May 2016 07: 25
      Quote: bt-50
      And here are the dollars per hour of operation? Are we Yankees?


      This is not to frighten readers with large numbers.))
      The number 2500 is somehow less than 165000. At the last rate.)
      Although yes, idiocy, pay in rubles, and count in shares.
    2. 0
      31 May 2016 11: 39
      At the same time as “AI-25TLSh ... dual turbojet engine.” Type Google translation AI-25TLSh double-circuit, two-shaft.
  21. +5
    30 May 2016 19: 02
    I saw this airplane flying (it passed above Zvenigorod, near Kubinka) - the reverse sweep of the wing looks very unusual from the ground :)
    Good luck and skill to our guys, pilots!
  22. 0
    30 May 2016 19: 45
    Good car!
  23. +3
    30 May 2016 19: 51
    I read about this plane where in the winter, on the VPK. at that time he was undergoing factory tests. my promised, in the case of a positive state test in the spring, immediately make an order for these cars. apparently sr10 will still be bought mo.
  24. +1
    30 May 2016 20: 10
    It’s good that there are guys in the forum who know about aviation ... Likbez got especially about the reverse sweep. A good plane with good takeoffs and similar landings ...
  25. 0
    30 May 2016 20: 24
    The little thing is of course interesting, only they will build their grandmothers, otherwise all the cheapness of training will be covered by the manufacturing costs, they started to learn how to use PO-2 in due time, and what makes the YAK -130 worse, harder, but closer to the original ... (L -39 will pass soon ... just finish its resource, but something new must be thought ...)
  26. -1
    30 May 2016 20: 49
    Quote: megafair
    They plan to put on them our Ufa AL-55.

    In 2007, during the tests, the TTT did not pass, spontaneous combustion was noted, because of which the engine did not start flight tests.
    Good replacement, you can’t say anything. belay
  27. -1
    30 May 2016 20: 58
    As the saying goes: "More good and different goods!"
  28. 0
    30 May 2016 21: 01
    We have a very large gap from prototypes to mass production, how much they mess with the PAK FA (T-50), it seems that when it gets on the conveyor, it will become obsolete. In the meantime, at least 2-3 hundreds of aircraft will be built another 15 years -20 will go
  29. +2
    30 May 2016 21: 26
    Quote: EvgNik
    It seemed to me, or is it really: when you plant it a little "goat"? Takeoff is fine, short takeoff run, but the landing is uncertain. I'm not a specialist and I can be wrong.

    no "goat", just a sidewind landing. The last two approaches or there was no wind, but most likely the pilot just got used to it, perfectly ground the car to the runway.
  30. +3
    30 May 2016 22: 04
    I sincerely wish Russian chicks in the future to become irresistible falcons that will protect the blue sky of Russia from all evil spirits: phantoms and tornadoes!
  31. +3
    30 May 2016 22: 22
    Quote: zennon
    Quote: captain
    Many pilots will be very happy. Instead, the Czech L-39 will be a great car.

    And again with the Kokhlov pikhl. "Motor Sich", Zaporozhye (clickable) ...

    You smart guy would be silent already. Motor Sich has nothing to do with Ukraine, except territorially. 80% of the production was delivered to Russia, and after the ban on cooperation with Russia, workers are very "glad" that they were left without work. By the way, Motor Sich has never worked for Ukraine, for 25 years of independence, not a single order has been received from Ukraine. And by the way, the AI-25tlsh is an excellent motor in its class, and there is no need to slander.
    1. +1
      30 May 2016 23: 34
      Quote: Orionvit
      You wise guy would be silent already.

      And you do not shut up my mouth, I do not care about you with your flag.
      Quote: Orionvit
      Motor Sich has nothing to do with Ukraine, except territorially.

      Tell it to your fellow citizens. Here they are neighing.
  32. 0
    30 May 2016 23: 13
    February flight, even before painting: https://cont.ws/post/215188
  33. +2
    31 May 2016 05: 42
    The development of the aircraft project began in 2007 with the efforts of two enthusiasts - Maxim Mironov and Sergey Yushin. Initially, the aircraft was positioned as a light sports and aerobatic, but already in the process of working on the project, the Russian Air Force also showed interest in it. After analyzing the relevant market for the TCB, designers came to the conclusion that the CP-10 can be used as a replacement for the L-39 for basic flight training of future military pilots. The designers believe that for the development of the SR-10, it is enough to have initial flight training on a Yak-52 class aircraft. In terms of its flight performance, the CP-10 is much superior to the obsolete L-39 in rate of climb, speed, maneuverability, turn radius and, importantly, it is lighter than a Czech car and outperforms it in terms of price / quality. That is, the aircraft is important and necessary, and I should get a ticket to life soon.
  34. +1
    31 May 2016 05: 47
    good luck, a very funny bird, most importantly in demand in its niche of training machines, and as a possible alternative to sports piston flyers ...
  35. +2
    31 May 2016 06: 14
    I wish the developers the shortest way to serial production, the aircraft will be in demand and I think not only in Russia
  36. +1
    31 May 2016 08: 53
    Quote: Altona
    Well, in this size of the aircraft will find other analogues of engines (Canadian, Brazilian, Chinese, some more). But you still need to make such beauty.



    And again, on the same rake without an engine, this is a pile of iron and why do we need it with the Khokhlyatsky Canadian and other engines. You have to do your own.
  37. +1
    31 May 2016 11: 06

    “The Yak-130 combat training enrolled in the air force is, in fact, an advanced training aircraft, and there are no simple and cheap jet machines for obtaining initial skills in Russia. The cadets are engaged in outdated and much heavier L-39, ”said the CB representative.
    In Russia back in the 90s, the MiG Design Bureau was created a wonderful lightweight modern real MiG-AT initial training aircraft. But he, contrary to common sense, but in accordance with the traditions of the new Russia, lost the tender to the heavy Yak-130.
  38. +1
    31 May 2016 12: 07
    New domestic aircraft of any class is the pride of Russia!
  39. +1
    31 May 2016 12: 30
    It’s interesting to fly on such a plane., At one time I was still studying on L29, I did not have time to fly on the Mig-17, they wrote off it for scrap. Now the planes are cooler and kerasin is ... Enviably and joyfully
  40. +1
    31 May 2016 15: 03
    Quote: faridg7
    To revive? You just need to take under the wing those flying clubs that are and that barely flounder. I assure you, and there will be enough instructors and attendants. If the state takes on at least half of the necessary expenses for the maintenance and maintenance of equipment, there will already be a sharp rise

    Oh, your words to God in the ears!
    And I would like to fly / master on such an airplane, otherwise years + VLEK ...
  41. msm
    msm
    +1
    31 May 2016 15: 31
    I have one thing - good luck !!
  42. +1
    31 May 2016 16: 49
    Have a good flight.
  43. 0
    31 May 2016 17: 37
    http://judgesuhov.livejournal.com/189133.html?thread=3744973
    Here it is described in more detail, although I do not agree.
  44. +2
    31 May 2016 18: 03
    I wish the young designers the launch of their brainchild in a series! It’s hard for Russian aviation to stand on the wing of the reverse sweep, and for beginner pilots an excellent training desk SR-10, so that in the 21st century in Russia there would be new Kozheduby and Pokryshkin!
  45. +1
    31 May 2016 19: 40
    And the Golden Eagle is the car of the future, apparently, the run-in begins with light training.
  46. +2
    31 May 2016 19: 41
    Well, there is a platform for combat UAV lol
  47. +1
    31 May 2016 23: 49
    Glad for our young pilots and defense industry!
  48. +1
    1 June 2016 09: 55
    Is this what the editorial board of topvar happily spreads the news about using the Khokhlyat engine? Well then, all nishtyak, black-assed groundhog and Vika Nuland are proud of you. Brothers, tell me a good patriotic news resource.
    1. 0
      1 June 2016 17: 35
      it’s being treated, but you haven’t yet paid attention to the double SS zippers on its wings
    2. 0
      1 June 2016 17: 35
      it’s being treated, but you haven’t yet paid attention to the double SS zippers on its wings
  49. 0
    1 June 2016 17: 33
    a beautiful machine ..... but you need your own engine and in a series .... I'm glad that something is being developed on our own initiative ..
  50. Nzn
    0
    2 June 2016 10: 35
    According to him, “the cost of an SR-10 flight hour is almost four times less than that of a Yak-130: $ 2500 versus $ 8000,


    Wow, what a price! belay If not a typo. it’s interesting whether such cars will be put into civilian operation
  51. 0
    2 June 2016 14: 43
    A cute "baby" with an unusual silhouette... God forbid it goes into series. Look, our pilots will finally have an inexpensive “flying desk.” If only the officials didn't bury...!
  52. 0
    2 June 2016 15: 39
    Well, you have to! Literally on May 12, while at work near Kubinka, I personally observed the flight of this plane overhead. This SR-10 flew almost overhead at a low altitude and puzzled me greatly, because besides the Russian Su-47 and the American experimental X-29, I did not know any other fighters with forward-swept wings.
  53. The comment was deleted.
  54. 0
    2 June 2016 16: 33
    GSh-23 under the hull and shoot helicopters.
  55. +1
    2 June 2016 16: 39
    -----------------


    Stalin urgently needs to teach how to make the entire line of his engines.[/quote]
    ...These issues were supervised by Lavrentiy Beria..

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"