Military Review

About how Kudrin invited the president to "at least play a secondary role in integrating into international technological relations"

299
On the eve of the newspaper "Vedomosti" in the section "Macroeconomics and Budget" published material Margarita Papchenkova and Aleksandr Prokopenko, who talks about the meeting of the top economic council under the president of Russia. This session was attended by economists of a wide range of views (from Glazyev to Kudrin), which, as it were, should have provided opportunities for finding optimal solutions aimed at stimulating the domestic economy. The discussion, apparently, was from the category of hot. Official information about the results of this meeting is rather scarce, however, according to the sources cited by Vedomosti journalists, the controversy was more than active.


One of those persons who made their proposals regarding the methods of stimulating the Russian economy was actually referred to Alexei Kudrin, who was returned to the economic segment of state institutions. That same Alexei Leonidovich Kudrin, whose name has recently spawned a new economic term - Kudrinomics. This term can be described as an irrepressible desire to send almost any super-profits (or even just incomes) of the state to the “jug” with the words: “for a rainy day”. Whether 50 oil is worth dollars per barrel or 120 is not so important for kudrinoomics ... It is important that “egg-cap” is, first of all, and no special expenses, even if these expenses are used to stimulate strategic industries. Thus, even the financing of the modernization of the Russian army and the entire system of the domestic defense industry, Alexei Leonidovich Kudrin, was taken almost in hostility. They say that it is impossible to spend from the “egg-bowl”, because a) “Russia has no enemies” and b) “what if a crisis?” As a result, it turned out that Russia has enemies, and that their number is not fundamentally related to whether the crisis is backyard or not a crisis.

That's just a strange thing, Mr. Kudrin and today demonstrates the belief that with the presence of ill-wishers Russia goes too far. Like, no one around us wants to harm us, and we ourselves are intimidating ourselves here with the expansion of NATO and the exploitation of the American missile defense segments in Eastern Europe ... It was we ourselves who came up with the threat of deploying a NATO military contingent in the Baltic States, reinforced aviation and armored vehicles ... And this is all purely “peaceful” programs of “great friends of Russia”, which “do not threaten Russia in any way”. And even if they threaten us, it is our own fault - we had to behave in such a way that our Western partners could please and not make them angry for nothing ...

During the meeting of the Economic Council under the President, the aforementioned Alexei Kudrin repeatedly said that the growth of investment in Russia implies a completely different Russia, which is today. Further, "pardoned" Kudrin directly addressed the President of the Russian Federation, stating that he should carry out a certain revision of Russia's foreign policy relations and "reduce geopolitical tensions" (this is a quote).



According to the ex-finance minister, “Russia is technologically lagging behind, and it needs to integrate into international technological relations, at least on second roles.” Until that time, as to submit a presidential response to this tirade, Mr. Kudrin, allow myself to comment.

Russia, of course, does not claim to be called the flagship of the world of technology, does not require to call itself an industrial leader. Our phones are mostly Chinese, most of the cars are assembled not without the participation of foreign components, there are big problems in the field of microelectronics. All this is yes ... But ... How can all this today be due to the presence of geopolitical tensions? Or, in the epoch of Mr. Kudrin’s being in the chair of the head of the Ministry of Finance, when such tensions didn’t seem to show up, was Russia technologically sovereign? We all spoke on Russian mobiles, used Russian computers with Russian software, didn’t we buy foreign medical equipment? So what? ..

When the "partners" squealed about their relative loyalty, Russia and managed to get hooked on a constant increase in dependence on foreign technologies and foreign components. It was then that we suddenly found out that it’s “unprofitable” and generally “stupid” to grow your apples and potatoes - it turns out that it is easier to buy them from Turkey, Poland or Israel for petrodollars. It was then that a total dependence on the cost of energy was formed, when government officials thought only about where to stuff super-profits from the sale of oil and gas, without worrying about the diversification of the economy. And Mr. Kudrin was at the financial and economic helm exactly at that time - during the growth of the Eurodollar volumes and during the time when all strategic projects were still cut on paper, so as not to reduce the level of savings (in fact, investment in the debts of the United States).

Yes - Russia has a lot of technological problems. However, to call the country “technologically backward” against the background of the fact that the “technologically developed” are not building new cosmodromes, cannot deliver their cosmonauts (astronauts) without Russia's help to orbit, is still a certain search. Russia is well aware of its problems, but “it’s not going to be built anywhere at least on the sidelines,” as required by Mr. Kudrin. Not that we have the mentality to hope "at least for the second role." If the “second roles” is the credo of Mr. Kudrin, then he hardly needs to work in the state structures of a country like Russia. Perhaps, today's Ukraine would be better suited there ... at least for third, at least for thirty third roles - if only they put a cookie in their mouth in the form of a new loan, which no one is going to repay anyway ...

Now about the answer to Mr. Kudrin from Vladimir Putin. According to the president, if Russia is somehow lagging behind, then this is not a reason to trade in its own sovereignty, given the country’s existence stories. Putin declared that he would defend this sovereignty "not only while he was president, but also until the end of his life."

Pathetic, but convincing.

It is another matter that Mr. Kudrin did not himself appear in the expert economic council with his “dissenting opinion”. It was introduced there by Russian President Vladimir Putin. If introduced for the purpose of activity in contrast, then this one. And if in order to nevertheless listen to the “guru” of kudrinoomics and accept his opinion as a guide to action, then this is quite another. It seems that the nearest geopolitical decisions will already show what is more important for Russia today - sovereignty or hard gingerbread from the "partners"? ..
Author:
Photos used:
http://akudrin.ru
299 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Putinets
    Putinets 31 May 2016 06: 21
    +66
    Where is the 58th article ?, an obvious traitor. Fake and .... No words. Db
    But it’s not clear, Putin probably knows about his addictions then why did he take it?
    On the other hand, Kudrin voiced what the entire economic composition of the government, headed by Medvedev, was thinking about. Doesn't touch them before the election?
    1. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 31 May 2016 06: 28
      +59
      Quote: Putin
      Where is the 58th article? Explicit traitor
      58th art. The Criminal Code that you have in mind was repealed in 1961. yes Let me remind you that this "obvious traitor" 11 years in a row (2000-2011) was the Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation.
      By the way, can you tell me whose Alexei Leonidovich is "sycophant"? Is it not the President of the Russian Federation, an hour?
      1. Putinets
        Putinets 31 May 2016 06: 33
        +1
        I think no. If only Putin had opened his mouth in the other direction, something like "Glory-glory".
        1. Ami du peuple
          Ami du peuple 31 May 2016 07: 08
          +76
          Quote: Putin
          I think not.
          Surely, our father, Vladimir Vladimirovich, without knowing about betrayal, he warmed the vile bespectacled snake - Alyoshka Kudrin on his chest ?! You must then immediately "Treason!" shout! And that Alyoshka should be dragged into the Secret Order on the rack - let him admit, the dog, at whose hostile instigation he "kudrinomiki" his ruin to the Russian state repaired!
          1. alstr
            alstr 31 May 2016 07: 55
            +47
            In fact, popular wisdom says: Keep your friends close, and your enemies even closer, so as to strangle them (enemies) in time
            1. dauria
              dauria 31 May 2016 09: 41
              +7
              Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer


              And if you put a horse in front of the cart, do they keep Putin? wink Give it a try. See how everything is simplified and understood.
            2. Hon
              Hon 31 May 2016 12: 53
              +40
              Quote: alstr
              In fact, popular wisdom says: Keep your friends close, and your enemies even closer, so as to strangle them (enemies) in time

              Putin keeps them, Medvedev, Nabiulina, Kudrin, Chubais, Serdyukov and others, put them in warm armchairs, well-fed to the feeders to strangle everyone. For sixteen years everything has been choking, choking, not strangling
              1. Platonich
                Platonich 31 May 2016 14: 26
                +17
                He strangles them with his billiards so that they don’t know where to put money!
              2. Stirbjorn
                Stirbjorn 31 May 2016 16: 10
                +9
                Quote: Hon
                Quote: alstr
                In fact, popular wisdom says: Keep your friends close, and your enemies even closer, so as to strangle them (enemies) in time

                Putin keeps them, Medvedev, Nabiulina, Kudrin, Chubais, Serdyukov and others, put them in warm armchairs, well-fed to the feeders to strangle everyone. For sixteen years everything has been choking, choking, not strangling

                You can strangle somehow, but in order not to let the budget go ?! It’s money from taxes, generally from the people’s, and not from Putin personally.
                1. PHANTOM-AS
                  PHANTOM-AS 31 May 2016 16: 12
                  +12
                  Quote: Stirbjorn
                  It’s money from taxes, generally from the people’s, and not from Putin personally.

                  interesting, but does he remember that?
                  1. demo
                    demo 31 May 2016 16: 45
                    +7
                    The state is me!
                    1. Mahmut
                      Mahmut 31 May 2016 18: 28
                      +4
                      Pudrin is a mirror of the Russian opposition. Volodya can’t break it, otherwise it will become completely nauseous from the undertale suite.
            3. demo
              demo 31 May 2016 16: 42
              +5
              There are so many friends around the "throne" and enemies are being wiped off that there will not be enough hands for both.
            4. go21zd45few
              go21zd45few 1 June 2016 18: 17
              -1
              Introducing Kudrin to the presidential council, Vladimir Putin put him on a chain so that, God forbid, he would not bite anyone.
          2. Corporal Valera
            Corporal Valera 31 May 2016 08: 02
            +3
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Really, our father, Vladimir Svet Vladimirovich, about the betrayal without knowing, the vile bespectacled snake - Alyoshka Kudrin, he warmed on his chest ?!

            In his grooms! Let the breeding stallions stimulate! Or they him
          3. midivan
            midivan 31 May 2016 08: 20
            +4
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            , a vile bespectacled snake - Alyoshka Kudrin

            can spectacle? Cobra does not pull of coursesmile , or rather it will scour the word lol
          4. Reserve officer
            Reserve officer 31 May 2016 08: 52
            +14
            Send to the USA, let them give advice there. At least some good will come from a bad boy. At least somehow serve the country.
            If, of course, someone will listen to this narcissistic "economist" ...
            1. weksha50
              weksha50 31 May 2016 13: 27
              +13
              Quote: Reserve officer
              Send to the USA, let them give advice there.



              THERE - nobody needs him ... Staffers need him with their advice HERE, in Russia ...
          5. alicante11
            alicante11 31 May 2016 12: 15
            +6
            Really, our father, Vladimir Svet Vladimirovich, about the betrayal without knowing, the vile bespectacled snake - Alyoshka Kudrin, he warmed on his chest ?!


            Yes, no, everything is simpler, in foreign policy GDP has a full carte blanche, so when Kudrin got into his bed, he got it right away. As regards domestic politics, here Kudrin is behind the red, liberal line, which the GDP either does not want or cannot cross.
            1. NordUral
              NordUral 31 May 2016 12: 53
              +15
              The main question - does not want or can not? And the second question - and to pacify whom the National Guard is being created - against the liberals or against nothing brought by giving the people’s power?
              1. alicante11
                alicante11 31 May 2016 13: 56
                +5
                The main question - does not want or can not?


                Who cares? The result is the same.

                and to pacify whom the national guard is being created


                Neither the liberals nor the people have a chance against the riot police. Shuffling and fragmentation of the security forces are designed so that in case of betrayal of the leadership of one intelligence agency, others could stretch the situation. To not happen as with Golden Eagle in Ukraine.
                1. Petr petrov
                  Petr petrov 31 May 2016 19: 08
                  +8
                  Looks like all the crap at the court ..... if I created yet another power service !!!!!
                2. indeveral
                  indeveral 1 June 2016 12: 32
                  +1
                  In 1917, the authorities, and the people, also thought that one could not trample on the gendarmes, Cossacks and troops. And as everything started spinning, so the entire "support" (or most of it) of the government did not want to defend it. In fact, in the Rosguard, there will be mostly ordinary people who have relatives among ordinary people. And if there is a flash, how will it all go, the big question.
                  1. Come on
                    Come on 2 June 2016 12: 36
                    +1
                    It is for this that they make the National Guard and tolerate Kadyrov. Otherwise, riot police may refuse to use force against the people.
                3. indeveral
                  indeveral 1 June 2016 12: 32
                  0
                  In 1917, the authorities, and the people, also thought that one could not trample on the gendarmes, Cossacks and troops. And as everything started spinning, so the entire "support" (or most of it) of the government did not want to defend it. In fact, in the Rosguard, there will be mostly ordinary people who have relatives among ordinary people. And if there is a flash, how will it all go, the big question.
              2. Monarchist
                Monarchist 31 May 2016 16: 27
                +3
                Let me be curious, who would prevent the internal troops from being used against “inside them enemies?” Suppose the National Guard was not created, but everything remained the same. At one bad moment, the president decides to use voviks against demonstrators, that the Minister of Internal Affairs will ask Zyuganov or Kasyanov ” can we you. "not democratic ..." Do not be naive! For some reason, the right liberals shouted "guard" and the left also got scared.
          6. michell
            michell 31 May 2016 12: 53
            0
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Really, our father, Vladimir Svet Vladimirovich, about the betrayal without knowing, the vile bespectacled snake - Alyoshka Kudrin, he warmed on his chest ?!

            If we take into account, moreover, that the president did not begin his labor activity as an assistant to the combine operator, but in the wake of his own competent structures ...
            1. kotvov
              kotvov 31 May 2016 17: 54
              +1
              Considering, moreover, that the president did not begin his career at all as an assistant to the combine operator, but in the wake of his own competent structures ... ,,
              I remember there was such a hero, General Gromov, the governor of the Moscow Region, and what?
          7. The comment was deleted.
          8. ruAlex
            ruAlex 31 May 2016 14: 41
            +1
            Why so dear? After all, obviously we don’t know the whole truth and intricacies, and since Kudrin is again admitted, the author’s thought about contrasts is quite likely, so to speak, listen to all points of view and make a decision. However, we’ll see what to guess.
            1. Petr petrov
              Petr petrov 31 May 2016 19: 11
              +2
              The same shuffles from the right pocket to the left !!!!!
              A fresh blood hde !!!!!!!!
              So you see "needed" !!!!!
              1. ARES623
                ARES623 31 May 2016 22: 18
                0
                Quote: Petr petrov
                The same shuffles from the right pocket to the left !!!!!
                A fresh blood hde !!!!!!!!
                So you see "needed" !!!!!

                The amount of intelligence in space is limited. The smartest on the sofas sit and do not show their eyes. smile
          9. larand
            larand 1 June 2016 15: 30
            +2
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Really, our father, Vladimir Svet Vladimirovich, about the betrayal without knowing, the vile bespectacled snake - Alyoshka Kudrin, he warmed on his chest ?!

            Yes, almost all Yeltsin chicks warmed up on this chest. They are all from the same deck and are shuffled from chair to chair. No one has been kicked out yet, despite the "successes".
      2. sherp2015
        sherp2015 31 May 2016 07: 53
        +5
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Let me remind you that this "obvious traitor" 11 years in a row (2000-2011) was the Minister of Finance and Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation.


        Why the hell would he have such an "advisor"
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null 31 May 2016 07: 58
          +7
          Quote: sherp2015
          Why the hell would he have such an "advisor"

          Glazyev + Kudrin = acid + alkali = alkali + acid wink

          1. Hon
            Hon 31 May 2016 12: 55
            +6
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            Glazyev + Kudrin = acid + alkali = alkali + acid

            judging by the actions of the government, no one listens to Glazyev, so balabolit for the background, but they clearly listen to Kudrin
      3. VSkilled
        VSkilled 31 May 2016 12: 51
        +6
        By the way, can you tell me whose Alexei Leonidovich is "sycophant"?

        Taki - "his own, newly found" people "":
        "Kudrin converted to Judaism." (http://holeclub.ru/news/kudrin_prinjal_iudaizm/2012-02-10-1340)

        He, now needs to FOR them try to be ... "holier than the pope himself," or, more precisely, "circumcised by the rabbi himself."

        You know, WHY did the Jews seize the most during Chubais's predatory "privatization"?

        They had a direct channel for transferring money from overseas, at ANY interest. Evgeny Kisilev (former chief editor of the Gusinsky NTV) - about this "on a blue eye", in the heat of controversy - blabbed ...
        ...
        1. japs
          japs 1 June 2016 10: 40
          +3
          Quote: VSkilled
          They had a direct channel for transferring money from overseas, at ANY interest. Evgeny Kisilev (former chief editor of the Gusinsky NTV) - about this "on a blue eye", in the heat of controversy - blabbed ...


          you risk, however, getting into the liquidators ...
    2. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 31 May 2016 06: 37
      +34
      Dear Putin ... And it was not under our and your president that the kudrins, Siluanovs, Chubais and the like rose ... Why (didn’t you think about it?) The guarantor will not slam this shop. Or they are crystal honest .. Or maybe they just shared!
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 07: 18
        +4
        Quote: dmi.pris
        .And not under our and your president’s curls, siluanovs, chubais rose

        Siluanov and Kudrin rose, then Kudrin fell as they fired. Chubais rose under EBN, collapsed under Putin.
        Quote: dmi.pris
        Why (didn’t you think about it?) The guarantor will not slam this bench.

        The time will come to slam everyone at once. Although I think they themselves will run away from the country.
        Quote: dmi.pris
        . Why odious personalities leave the court. Well, there was no evidence .. Or they are crystal honest .. Or maybe they just shared!

        Who has left?
        1. Stas157
          Stas157 31 May 2016 07: 32
          +14
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Chubais rose under EBN, collapsed under Putin.

          Where did it crash? What place?
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          The time will come to slam everyone at once. Although I think they themselves will run away from the country.

          And if not? Do you have a special gift of foresight or are you a spokesman for Putin?
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 08: 02
            +2
            Quote: Stas157

            Where did it crash? What place?

            He no longer steers the country.
            Quote: Stas157

            And if not? Do you have a special gift of foresight or are you a spokesman for Putin?

            Sound prognosis.
            1. asiat_61
              asiat_61 31 May 2016 09: 58
              +13
              Does Chubais himself know about this? He needs to be informed somehow.
            2. Hon
              Hon 31 May 2016 13: 01
              +6
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              He no longer steers the country.

              He was the first deputy of Chernomyrdin, left RAO UES under Yeltsin, and then successfully carried out the privatization of RAO UES, and settled in Rusnano, an organization very profitable for him
            3. Petr petrov
              Petr petrov 31 May 2016 19: 14
              +1
              Who told you? lol
          2. Angara
            Angara 31 May 2016 08: 24
            +5
            Quote: Stas157
            Where did it crash? What place?

            in bananotechnology wassat
            1. Stas157
              Stas157 31 May 2016 09: 42
              +20
              Quote: Angara
              in bananotechnology

              Where the oohulyards state. of money!
        2. Gardamir
          Gardamir 31 May 2016 07: 33
          +27
          then Kudrin fell as they fired. Chubais rose under EBN, collapsed under Putin.
          You call, yours. Only Kudrin was removed by Medvedev. But Chubais, it finally does not sink.
        3. kotvov
          kotvov 31 May 2016 17: 56
          +8
          Chubais rose under EBN, collapsed under Putin. ,,
          I would also like to collapse
          do not answer for anything, know the loot drank.
        4. Eugen
          Eugen 1 June 2016 11: 31
          +1
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          Siluanov and Kudrin rose, then Kudrin fell as they fired. Chubais rose under EBN, collapsed under Putin.

          Just an enchanting fall ...
        5. Eugen
          Eugen 1 June 2016 11: 34
          0
          And as always straight to the mattress with money
      2. Sirocco
        Sirocco 31 May 2016 08: 10
        +8
        Quote: dmi.pris
        . Why (didn’t you think about it?) The guarantor will not slam this bench.

        Why? I suspect that this is the plan described above. It’s like in a joke about Anka, who was crawling into the camp of the enemy, and Petka invited Vasily Ivanovich to slap her, to which Chapay replied, do not touch her, this is our biological weapon. Is such an option possible? Yes.
        Now, about which of these liberals is good and who is bad, what difference does it make? Good will float in good coffins, bad in bad ones. That's the whole difference between Kudry, Chewbacca, and other stellar landing)))))
      3. Volzhanin
        Volzhanin 31 May 2016 08: 19
        +9
        This is a serious question that torments half the country!
        Why does Putin need these collaborative insignificants, disgracing and discrediting him? There is no clear answer yet. I think the truth will be known only when these nits are thrown into the trash from the domineering tusny.

        Perhaps, after the election, these idiots from the economic block will also be removed.
        1. epsilon571
          epsilon571 31 May 2016 09: 00
          +5
          Perhaps, after the election, these idiots from the economic block will also be removed.


          And this is a dear friend how to vote. It is not for nothing that these gentlemen are in a hurry to sell more today, but to play a dirty trick. In a year, Putin will go to warm countries to rest from the labors of his righteous, but they will remain. It is necessary to promote more adequate people to power, and to repair Alyoshka Kudrin and other vzdimtsev in the "Secret Order".
          1. Monarchist
            Monarchist 31 May 2016 16: 48
            +3
            Venerable epsilon tell me, who do you see as the receiver of VV: daddy "Zyu" 'Kasyanov, Vladimir Volfovich, or maybe yourself? As for Kudrin in the "secret order", I agree, but order the yaryzhki not to forget Timurych, and grab the "chubik". Otherwise, there will be nothing: planned, milked together, and the batogs alone?
            1. Pavel Koltunov
              Pavel Koltunov 31 May 2016 23: 37
              0
              , and whom do you see as a BB receiver


              Sulakshina Stepan Stepanych. Do you know this?
        2. Corsair
          Corsair 31 May 2016 09: 54
          +5
          Quote: Volzhanin
          Perhaps, after the election, these idiots from the economic block will also be removed.

          They won’t take it away, because they are doing their best to prove that there are no other competent economists, and of those that exist, they all studied at HSE and abroad, therefore there will be exactly the same idiotic methods of saving funds by investing them in the securities of potential opponents and buying green cut paper.
        3. Tambov Wolf
          Tambov Wolf 31 May 2016 10: 19
          +7
          Dreaming is certainly not harmful. But vague doubts torment that these gentlemen will be removed. They are friends of Our All.
        4. Hon
          Hon 31 May 2016 13: 07
          +4
          Quote: Volzhanin
          This is a serious question that torments half the country!
          Why does Putin need these collaborative insignificants, disgracing and discrediting him? There is no clear answer yet. I think the truth will be known only when these nits are thrown into the trash from the domineering tusny.

          and what if there is no plan, but Putin needs them, because these are his friends, comrade-in-arms, in a word, whom he does not abandon
    3. Karabin
      Karabin 31 May 2016 06: 50
      +26
      Putin probably knows about his addictions then why did he take it?


      Putintsev head for raskoryaku. Why superpatriot superpreditor? Calm down, this is such a Very Tricky Plan.
      Quote: Putin
      Doesn't touch them before the election?

      Before the election of 2024?
    4. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 31 May 2016 07: 14
      +20
      These liberals in Russia, or rather for our president, that India is a sacred cow .. Do not touch!
      1. Gardamir
        Gardamir 31 May 2016 07: 34
        +13
        These liberals in Russia, or rather for our president, that India is a sacred cow .. Do not touch!
        maybe he’s like that?
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Ami du peuple
          Ami du peuple 31 May 2016 08: 01
          +16
          Quote: Gardamir
          maybe he’s like that?
          Well, if nothing has changed in four years, then yes smile
          1. ism_ek
            ism_ek 31 May 2016 14: 03
            0
            To the right of Putin, only the wall.
          2. Platonich
            Platonich 31 May 2016 14: 35
            0
            Yeah, if Peskov said, then so it ......
    5. Flinky
      Flinky 31 May 2016 07: 18
      +2
      Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. ArhipenkoAndrey
      ArhipenkoAndrey 31 May 2016 08: 17
      +15
      Deleting tension according to Kudrinski - the entire male population of Russia should put on his pants with a fly back, again become tolerant and remove such concepts as national interests and economically strong Russia, give up Crimea, give up the islands and then we will again be good for the West - bravo Kudrin, the khan of independent Russia, after all, after that, the states will raise the issue of giving Lake Baikal and the bowels of Siberia to all "progressive" humanity, that is, to themselves, and then the tension will subside and Kudrin will be happy. In general, it is not clear why this outspoken Westerner, who is on the cat of the country's outspoken enemies, was brought closer to governing the country.
      1. Pavel Koltunov
        Pavel Koltunov 31 May 2016 23: 43
        -1
        In general, why is this frank Westernizer, who is on the map with the frank enemies of the country, closer to governing the country unclear.

        They already said - keep the enemies closer ...
    8. siberalt
      siberalt 31 May 2016 08: 46
      +22
      Wasn't Kudrin contributing to the "technological backwardness of Russia" by hiding money in a box and not giving it to overcome this backwardness? am
      1. Basarev
        Basarev 31 May 2016 09: 13
        +15
        Wasn't Putin putting Kudrin to steer finance from the very beginning of his presidency?
      2. ArhipenkoAndrey
        ArhipenkoAndrey 31 May 2016 09: 20
        +8
        D, in principle, it was not only Kudrin who pushed Russia toward backwardness, but most of all the thought, having abolished speculation and calling it a trade, and this generation is now slowly destroying all sectors of industry and agriculture - outbidding is an enemy of the industrial stock, up to ten outbits per produced or mined unit parasites, hence the price and disadvantage of production, with anything.
      3. Al1977
        Al1977 31 May 2016 12: 31
        -3
        Quote: siberalt
        Wasn't Kudrin contributing to the "technological backwardness of Russia" by hiding money in a box and not giving it to overcome this backwardness?

        I, too, when there is "extra money", put it in the "box". Russia is an unpredictable country and it is dangerous to live here for one day. The current situation has proved this for the hundredth time. I am learning from the mistakes of my parents who believed that there would be no denomination, everything would be fine. No already, in different currencies and in a box. So I have "Kudrinskaya Model" at home. Second point. How did Kudrin leave, did we live better? Let's compare the years when he was and when he was gone. What has changed in principle? Maybe it's not about him? The third point, does everyone here consider Putin an idiot? He is WHY satisfied with the economic bloc, who will answer?
        1. Monarchist
          Monarchist 31 May 2016 16: 57
          0
          If VV (which I doubt) then who will be better: Kudrin and K or ...?
        2. Pavel Koltunov
          Pavel Koltunov 31 May 2016 23: 49
          0
          He is WHY satisfied with the economic bloc, who will answer?


          In short, the entire government is in charge of the economy according to the adopted strategic plans and laws. You should know that, Comrade Major.
    9. Vend
      Vend 31 May 2016 09: 53
      -2
      Quote: Putin

      But it’s not clear, Putin probably knows about his addictions then why did he take it?
      On the other hand, Kudrin voiced what the entire economic composition of the government, headed by Medvedev, was thinking about. Doesn't touch them before the election?

      It is quite understandable, the old adage "Keep your friends close, and your enemies even closer."
    10. Ivan Ivanov
      Ivan Ivanov 31 May 2016 11: 54
      +3
      Putin is comfortable with moderate liberalism, which is why both Kudrin and the government are in place. The purpose of the advice for Putin is to find a growth model while maintaining sovereignty through different points of view. In my opinion so.
      1. AndreyS
        AndreyS 31 May 2016 22: 14
        +1
        Quote: IvanIvanov
        Putin is comfortable with moderate liberalism, which is why both Kudrin and the government are in place. The purpose of the advice for Putin is to find a growth model while maintaining sovereignty through different points of view. In my opinion so.

        Hooray! Good opinion !!!!!!!!
        I don’t know about the “cunning plans”, but I remember films about intelligence officers and counterintelligence officers and such an interesting term - operational game.
    11. Hon
      Hon 31 May 2016 12: 48
      +4
      Quote: Putin
      Doesn't touch them before the election?

      and if after the election they are not touched, what do you say?
      1. Stirbjorn
        Stirbjorn 31 May 2016 16: 16
        +3
        Quote: Hon
        and if after the election they are not touched, what do you say?

        they will say that they didn’t talk about these elections, but about the next fellow laughing
    12. vezunchik
      vezunchik 31 May 2016 22: 53
      0
      so the money must be worked out by the family in the USA. Ina Bolotny is an active member in the council, and Udaltsov and Kvachkov are sitting, Kvachkova is again sewing a new business. And your kudrin
    13. vezunchik
      vezunchik 31 May 2016 22: 53
      0
      so the money must be worked out by the family in the USA. Ina Bolotny is an active member in the council, and Udaltsov and Kvachkov are sitting, Kvachkova is again sewing a new business. And your kudrin
    14. yehat
      yehat 1 June 2016 10: 08
      +1
      Kudrin is an accountant. He is not an economist, much less an economist of the scale of a large country. And he gives accounting advice, by the way, from this position is quite conscientious.
      Therefore, it seems to him that to create a little egg, to integrate, share, invest in American papers - that’s it. If we want active development, we should not trust its judgments.
    15. Nikolay K
      Nikolay K 1 June 2016 11: 19
      0
      Lizoblyud

      Yes, in our country there are enough dementia. Some even nicknames appropriate invent. wink
  2. Mavrikiy
    Mavrikiy 31 May 2016 06: 26
    +12
    Kudrin well done. Let Russia play a supporting role ... Why not a tenth?
    1. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 31 May 2016 06: 37
      +2
      A brilliant song from "Wedding in Malinovka", an excerpt: "You just have to raise your eyes and ... jump, well, like a goat !!"
      Or something else he did with his own eyes? And bounces for the United States.
    2. Stas157
      Stas157 31 May 2016 07: 37
      +2
      Quote: Mavrikiy
      Let Russia play a supporting role ... Why not a tenth?

      And the tenth, he kept in mind!
      1. Mavrikiy
        Mavrikiy 31 May 2016 17: 02
        +1
        Quote: Stas157
        Quote: Mavrikiy
        Let Russia play a supporting role ... Why not a tenth?

        And the tenth, he kept in mind!

        Probably yes. I understood that for the "tenths" they can really take offense and really offend.
    3. 34 region
      34 region 31 May 2016 10: 22
      +2
      Mauritius! 06.26. Here rather leech motif is visible. You must stick to something. The main thing is to suck. And this is the whole motive of the liberal economy. They don’t even think differently. They don’t have a thought, it should be done to us or it should be done by me At the same time they call themselves gentlemen. But in fact, not gentlemen and not comrades. Their behavior is no different from the behavior of worms. The lifestyle is similar.
  3. Andrey Yuryevich
    Andrey Yuryevich 31 May 2016 06: 26
    +26
    we have a crisis of economists? besides kudrin, is there no one to listen to? request not okay something, in our "kingdom" ...
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 31 May 2016 06: 37
      +5
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      do we have a crisis of economists? besides Kudrin there is no one to listen to? not okay something, in our "kingdom" ...

      There are people to listen to, there were a lot of people, just the protagonists Kudrin and Glazyev were just hearing. It is not interesting to write about the rest of the press.
    2. Karabin
      Karabin 31 May 2016 06: 52
      +14
      Quote: Andrey Yurievich
      not okay something, in our "kingdom" ...

      The king is naked.
    3. Pavel Koltunov
      Pavel Koltunov 31 May 2016 23: 55
      0
      not okay something, in our "kingdom" ...

      C'mon ... first time, galleries. Understand, do not hesitate.
  4. Gray brother
    Gray brother 31 May 2016 06: 28
    +4
    . And if in order to nevertheless listen to the “guru” of kudrinomics and accept his opinion as a guide to action, then this is completely different.

    What else, in a stump, a guide to action?
    In his closing speech, Putin said that Russia was not the first to start, Vedomosti's interlocutors said. The President recalled that Russia has a thousand-year history, although the country has lagged behind in some ways. Putin also said that the Russian Federation would not trade in sovereignty, promising to protect him not only as head of state, but also until the end of his life, two council members said.
    1. Karabin
      Karabin 31 May 2016 07: 11
      +9
      Quote: Gray Brother
      having promised to defend him not only as head of state, but also until the end of his life,

      To promise does not mean to marry. And where was this promise the last 16 years, while the kudrins killed economic sovereignty?
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 07: 20
        0
        Quote: Karabin
        To promise does not mean to marry. And where was this promise the last 16 years, while the kudrins killed economic sovereignty?

        Strange, but how old were you in the 90s? They kill sovereignty, they kill, but they cannot kill everything.
        1. Karabin
          Karabin 31 May 2016 08: 19
          +9
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          They kill sovereignty, they kill, but they cannot kill everything.

          The control shot remained. Privatization of state corporations. Ali not in the know about Putin and Co.’s plans?
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 08: 53
            +16
            Quote: Karabin
            The control shot remained.

            Old man your comments from 2012 lol
            Karabin RU July 18, 2012 20:00 | The Federation Council ratified the protocol on Russia's accession to the WTO
            Putin has a control shot.

            The misfire was laughing
            And Putin also leaked Syria
            Karabin RU August 9, 2012 07:42 | Having surrendered Syria, the UN gave the go-ahead to a new world massacre
            But the problem is that the person who is not able to protect the victim of robbery will eventually find himself in the victim’s position
            Is Russia, even in the current state of affairs, not capable of protecting Syria? We can’t supply modern weapons, and not only defensive ones? What prevents us, in agreement with Assad, from having a real military presence in Tartus? We are able to protect Syria. The question lies on a different plane, in the ability of the country's leadership to make a decision.
            The authorities do not believe in the strength of the people and thinks more not about their approval of their actions, but about their approval by world centers of power
            It is not regrettable, but I agree with the author.

            You talked about the army when it was re-equipped, now I understand there is no desire. The drain did not take place and it is better to forget what you wrote before. Do a control shot in your head.
            1. Platonich
              Platonich 31 May 2016 14: 39
              +3
              And in my opinion already people do not quite trust Putin !!
          2. Monarchist
            Monarchist 31 May 2016 17: 12
            0
            Putin and Co. are bad. Atom them! We have the best: Gudkov, Navalny and Karabin will help here?
      2. Cat man null
        Cat man null 31 May 2016 07: 20
        +10
        Quote: Karabin
        To promise does not mean to marry. And where was that promise the last 16 years, while the kudrins have killed economic sovereignty?

        Hmmm? 2016 - 16 = 2000 (year) belay

        Do you seriously believe that in 2000 the Russian Federation possessed economic sovereignty? And was there something to "kill"?

        Md negative
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 07: 37
          +1
          Quote: Cat Man Null

          Do you seriously believe that in 2000 the Russian Federation possessed economic sovereignty? And was there something to "kill"?

          So liberals and communists consider. Adequate to another opinion.
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null 31 May 2016 07: 51
            +3
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            So liberals and communists consider

            - And comrade Karabin - from which he will be? I don’t understand sad

            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Adequate other opinions

            - not, that which is not adequate is understandable .. but who exactly is the question ..
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 08: 01
              +6
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              - And Komrad Karabin - from what will he be? I do not distinguish between them

              A mixture of a bulldog with a rhino. 4 years on the site yelling that Putin leaked Russia, leaked Syria, leaked something else there.
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 31 May 2016 08: 04
                +1
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                Quote: Cat Man Null
                - And Komrad Karabin - from what will he be? I do not distinguish between them

                A mixture of a bulldog with a rhino. 4 years on the site yelling that Putin leaked Russia, leaked Syria, leaked something else there

                - Donbass, probably?
                - but I like those .. stubborn solid stones .. always know in advance what to expect from them .. like from a tram at a bus stop laughing
                1. Karabin
                  Karabin 31 May 2016 08: 36
                  +7
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  - But I like these ones .. hard-headed hard-headed .. always know ahead of time what to expect from them .. like from a tram at a bus stop

                  But you have amazing flexibility. Follow the intricate line of the party exactly.
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  - Donbass, probably?

                  Have you already figured out what is the genius of a leader when Donbass is pushed back into dill?
                  1. Cat man null
                    Cat man null 31 May 2016 08: 42
                    +1
                    Quote: Karabin
                    But you have amazing flexibility. Follow the intricate line of the party

                    - is it a compliment, or a reason for a fight? what
                    - all one - past .. we are non-partisan .. still from the Union, and to this day yes

                    Quote: Karabin
                    Have you already figured out what is the genius of a leader when Donbass is pushed back into dill?

                    - as soon as I shove it, I’ll immediately come up with
                    - it's up to the small thing - to shove it .. I’m waiting for a wait, it will not last long, right? wink
                  2. yehat
                    yehat 31 May 2016 15: 00
                    +4
                    to shove back, you must first shove.
                    But Putin and his entourage seriously affect the fact that Donbass does not leave Ukraine.
                    And there is at least a serious argument why. Russia does not need a ring of Russophobia around (example of the Baltic states, Poland). It does not matter where it passes - along the border of Donbass, Kiev, Stavropol or Romania.
                    If Donbass separates, then such a border will appear along the border of Donbass, because Ukraine will become, albeit conditionally, completely Russophobic. And if not, then such a border may not appear at all. And a solid ring on the western border will not work.
                    1. Monarchist
                      Monarchist 31 May 2016 17: 36
                      +1
                      Here I agree: a significant part of Ukrainians are painful that Crimea “floated away” and at the same time they doubt: did the “quilted jackets” really seize Donbas (it takes some trouble)? Now Novorosiya joined Russia, Crimea “floated away”, plus constant agitation Lyashko, here is "Aunt Vasya" and what will he think about yah?
                      1. Cat man null
                        Cat man null 1 June 2016 16: 25
                        0
                        Quote: Monarchist
                        a significant part of Ukrainians are hurt that Crimea has "floated away"

                        - uh-huh ... from they are already in thought: "but should we not sail away, too?"

                        Guys ... how I see all this crap .. once, I won’t repeat:

                        - in the 90s the project "Ukraine is not Russia" was launched
                        - project .. not unsuccessful, according to the results

                        ALL..

                        Further, only details. For those who want a post-battles - I have them, details .. guys .. no need .. I’ll eat without salt, and ask for additives ...

                        Damn .. not in the style of comments .. okay, I’ll leave .. from the heart, but request
              2. Karabin
                Karabin 31 May 2016 08: 37
                +1
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                A mixture of a bulldog with a rhino.

                Not putrast, that's for sure.
                1. Cat man null
                  Cat man null 31 May 2016 08: 50
                  +4
                  Quote: Karabin
                  Quote: Alexander Romanov
                  A mixture of a bulldog with a rhino.

                  Not putrast, that's for sure.

                  - really a turbopatriot? belay
                2. Alexander Romanov
                  Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 09: 09
                  +4
                  Quote: Karabin
                  Not putrast, that's for sure.

                  Liberast probably
              3. yehat
                yehat 31 May 2016 14: 54
                +2
                he has only to change the phraseology a little, yell "cast" and then no one will reproach him)))
            2. Karabin
              Karabin 31 May 2016 08: 21
              +1
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              - not that which is not adequate -

              Oh thank you!
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 31 May 2016 08: 23
                0
                Quote: Karabin
                Quote: Cat Man Null
                - not that which is not adequate -

                Oh thank you!

                - But what - was he mistaken? I would be glad to make a mistake .. what
          2. Stas157
            Stas157 31 May 2016 10: 04
            +8
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            So liberals and communists consider. Adequate to another opinion.

            Well, you are Alexander, of course, you answered both for the liberals and the Communists! Do you, then, have an opinion? There are a lot of messages from you, but the only thing that understood from you is that you are an implacable fighter with the communists and liberals, and you are always equalizing them, despite their obvious antagonism! And, here is my opinion, I have not found in you, except for the unconditional support of ED and Putin! For some reason, you have already declared me a communist, although I try to have my own (albeit not correct) opinions, and I do not try to voice the point of view of any political parties.
            1. Alexander Romanov
              Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 10: 10
              +3
              Quote: Stas157
              Do you, then, have an opinion?

              Did not notice?
              Quote: Stas157
              ! And, here’s my opinion, I haven’t found you,

              They definitely didn’t notice. I can give glasses.
              Quote: Stas157
              , except for the unconditional support of ED and Putin!

              When did I support the unit ??? When ??? I always write that they are all the same, that ED, that the Communist Party.
              Quote: Stas157
              For some reason you have already declared me a communist,

              I spit who you are, honestly. But if your opinion is the same with the West and the liberals, well, I will not add you as a friend.
              I do not see constructive criticism, I see stupid trolling and nothing more.
              1. Stas157
                Stas157 31 May 2016 11: 18
                +3
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                They definitely didn’t notice. I can give glasses.

                Thank you, but even a microscope does not help there!))
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                When did I support the unit ??? When ??? I always write that they are all the same, that ED, that the Communist Party.

                Here is the news! And who do you support then? In my opinion, it’s always Putin’s line, the line of power, and ED, of course. Not?
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                I spit who you are, honestly.

                Could everyone not announce it! Thank you, even respond to my comments!
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                But if your opinion is the same with the West and the liberals, well, I will not add you as a friend.

                If Romanov does not like someone’s opinion, then he immediately writes them down either in the liberals or in the communists! Romanov, you still called me a communist, why did I suddenly become a liberal?
                Quote: Alexander Romanov
                if your opinion is the same with the West

                Ah, why did they ascribe to me? You really lie more believable!
        2. Karabin
          Karabin 31 May 2016 08: 20
          +4
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          Do you seriously believe that in 2000 the Russian Federation possessed economic sovereignty?

          Do you seriously believe that something has fundamentally changed?
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null 31 May 2016 08: 24
            +1
            Quote: Karabin
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            Do you seriously believe that in 2000 the Russian Federation possessed economic sovereignty?

            Do you seriously believe that something has fundamentally changed?

            - Nope .. the grass is green, the sky is blue, the water is wet .. everything is as before .. it’s already boring laughing
            - there’s such a factory current .. the candlelight, where I used to work, stood in the 90s (@ -ka), but right now it buzzes for some reason. Yes, it buzzes so vigorously .. it's a pity that I no longer work there sad

            And so - yes everything is as before, you are right .. all around laughing
            1. Karabin
              Karabin 31 May 2016 08: 49
              +2
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              - there’s such a factory current .. the candlelight, where I used to work, stood in the 90s (@ -ka), but right now it buzzes for some reason.

              And "Zil" doesn't buzz. And a long list. Have not fit into kneeing over the past 15 years.
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 31 May 2016 08: 59
                +2
                Quote: Karabin
                And "Zil" doesn't buzz. And a long list. Didn't fit in knee-jerking in the last 15 years

                - sorry. I can not help sad
                - and on the third hand, if - it buzzes after all, too .. a lot of things yes
          2. yehat
            yehat 31 May 2016 15: 08
            +3
            Yes, there are changes. Sovereignty has not become much more - yes, but we almost completely got rid of the financial stranglehold of debts and a new player appeared again - the state. Whatever it is, but it is there and mobilized, at least partially, to fight for sovereignty. This is the difference from the 2000s. Now the Russian Federation needs cultural and economic expansion in order for economic ties to reach at least a billion (Starikov’s party has a different recipe - to give birth to a billion, which I like, but how to realize it!). This is necessary to create a cost-effective space, which will ensure true independence. The USSR had a situation very close to this.
            1. 34 region
              34 region 31 May 2016 15: 25
              +2
              15.08/XNUMX. But how to carry out the expansion? By the forces of the army or your goods? To give birth to children is not like a problem. The problems then begin. If women will only give birth, then almost half of our hands will not be with us. Then the question of medicine and education arises. Then the question is the industry of children's goods, housing. Some labor can not raise the economy.
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 31 May 2016 18: 43
                +2
                Quote: Region 34
                That having children is not a problem

                - yeah, schazz..women shchaz clever smarted, right? He thinks - to give birth, and to feed with what? Me, women .. children, I already .. that .. feed myself ..

                Not funny. I have a daughter (mine, from my wife and the only one ... unfortunately request ) - 02.90.

                It just was fly away, believe me ..

                - there is nothing
                - including and salaries
                - and the wife (lactating, by the way) with her daughter (young child, for months) - they, damn it, want to eat .. and not a straw nifiga what

                They worked, honestly. The market, bought something, sold something .. but my wife got money .. for apples, damn it .. and milk, really, tasted better (the child did not complain about appetite nirazu .. did not know how patamushta) ...

                So .. a sketch from nature, incomplete, by the way .. we still had no housing - we lived on a rented laughing

                I apologize for the Tatar accent - for habits .. I had a friend, a fellow student .. he is already 16 years old .. as he is not.

                That's something like request
              2. yehat
                yehat 1 June 2016 10: 35
                0
                and what will change? with all due respect to women, they do not influence the country's production so much. See what specialties they are busy with.
                60 percent is a service, and female.
                no, the problem is different - not even to feed, but to ensure a high standard of living for four times the population
        3. yehat
          yehat 31 May 2016 14: 51
          +5
          in fact, Russia lost economic sovereignty when Gorbachev abolished CMEA
          in fact - around 1995, when financial speculation and other destruction exceeded the enormous margin of safety of the economy created in the USSR.

        4. MaksoMelan
          MaksoMelan 31 May 2016 16: 46
          +3
          Nsverinitet or not but something remained. Country. People. But in another. WHAT KUDRIN DID ALL THESE YEARS. Tried to embed? Oh well. And where are the results. For example, I heard that children pick up iPhones in China. Kudrin offers us to be on such side roles?
      3. Papandopulo
        Papandopulo 31 May 2016 07: 25
        +1
        Quote: Cat man null
        Md


        Is it not Europe that depends on Russian energy exports?
        1. Gardamir
          Gardamir 31 May 2016 07: 40
          0
          Is it not Europe that depends on Russian energy exports?
          This is dear Boris Nikolaevich to Europe in the 90s dragged pipelines. And now Turkey, Israel, Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan will quickly realize the new gas pipeline. Already pulling. And no one promises sanctions to them, on the contrary they give money.
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 07: 43
            +4
            Quote: Gardamir
            And now Turkey, Israel, Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan will quickly realize the new gas pipeline. Already pulling.

            Yeah, Nabucco has already been built.
            Turkey, is that a country in which a warrior will not break out today tomorrow?
            Israel does not export gas and never will!
            Tell me the percentage of Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan.
            Quote: Gardamir
            This is dear Boris Nikolaevich to Europe in the 90s dragged pipelines.

            Pray for the savior of Russia.
            1. Gardamir
              Gardamir 31 May 2016 07: 57
              +3
              Pray for the savior of Russia.
              The Holy Trinity Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Putin!
              1. Alexander Romanov
                Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 08: 18
                +1
                Quote: Gardamir
                The Holy Trinity Gorbachev, Yeltsin, Putin!

                Well, I see answers to my question, what percentage of the gas market is occupied by Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan will not.
                So I came to shout, as URA shouted to Gorbachev and Yeltsin. You see, the old man, you're all transparent.
                Punin is criticized today-the West, liberals and communists, the conclusion is one shobla!
            2. Papandopulo
              Papandopulo 4 June 2016 12: 35
              0
              Quote: Alexander Romanov
              Pray for the savior of Russia.

              it's a diamond ... wink

              Gazprom, as it had the largest share, is so ... or "you will be burning with wood."
            3. The comment was deleted.
          2. Angara
            Angara 31 May 2016 08: 36
            +8
            Quote: Gardamir
            This is dear Boris Nikolaevich to Europe in the 90s dragged pipelines.

            what Wow!!! Looks like in the USSR, on the radio, fairy tales were told about the construction of the Urengoy-Pomary-Uzhgorod gas pipeline, which, if my memory serves me right, was completed in 1983 before the arrival of Mecheny. But it turns out that it was like Yeltsin himself pulled him in the 90s. Well, what can you say? GOOD EBN !! wassat
            1. Gardamir
              Gardamir 31 May 2016 13: 59
              0
              Wow!!
              Urengoy-pomary-Uzhgorod passes by my town, so I know well about those times. And I remember well about the 90s, when we waited for "commercial" gas for two months and on TV in the news we talked about the success of Russian gas workers. If you do not know this, it does not mean that it did not happen. The motto of the Trinity has not changed "everything for the West, everything for partners."
      4. Gray brother
        Gray brother 31 May 2016 07: 31
        +3
        Quote: Karabin
        and kudrins killed economic sovereignty?

        And what Russia initially had economic sovereignty? In my opinion, Russia has just begun to acquire it.
        1. sa-ag
          sa-ag 31 May 2016 07: 52
          +5
          Quote: Gray Brother
          And what Russia initially had economic sovereignty? In my opinion, Russia has just begun to acquire it.

          How? Has industrial production received an incentive to develop in the form of cheap "long" loans?
          1. Gray brother
            Gray brother 31 May 2016 08: 22
            +5
            Quote: sa-ag
            How? Has industrial production received an incentive to develop in the form of cheap "long" loans?

            The government realized that it was better to have its own production, this is already not enough.
            We have all private enterprises, it is difficult to obtain loans, and the Central Bank does not have confidence in either banks or industrialists. It is unclear how to control the use of funds - they will receive denyushki and get off to England, but there is no issue from the Thames.
            There is a program to support manufacturers, but there are not only "long" loans, but also "long" ones, until all checks and approvals are passed - either the donkey dies, or the padishah.
            What can I say, whom they raised with those now and are tormented.

            http://base.garant.ru/70643464/
            1. Corsair
              Corsair 31 May 2016 11: 27
              +2
              Quote: Gray Brother
              The government realized that it was better to have its own production, this is already not enough.

              belay Are you sure you got it? So far, only one import is being replaced by another. Neither cheap loans nor tax incentives are foreseen for their producers, and apparently conscience does not allow printing money, for they have tied the ruble tightly to foreign trade, and specifically to the dollar. All serious economists talk about the need for cheap loans inside the country, and our "smart people" look at the stock exchanges - they are afraid of speculators, but for some reason they do not take them for the money.
          2. Pavel Koltunov
            Pavel Koltunov 1 June 2016 00: 29
            +2
            Has industrial production received an incentive to develop in the form of cheap "long" loans?


            For industrial production, not loans are needed, but sales markets !!! We can produce it, but sell it ... The West is full, the East is a delicate and long matter.
      5. Stas157
        Stas157 31 May 2016 07: 42
        +8
        Quote: Karabin
        And where was this promise the last 16 years, while the kudrins killed economic sovereignty?

        The Yeltsin Center designed, considered what achievements to show!
        1. Cat man null
          Cat man null 31 May 2016 07: 54
          -6
          Quote: Stas157
          the promise of the last 16 years ... The Yeltsin Center designed, pondered what achievements to show

          - And you, from a campaign, from turbopatriots will be?
          1. Stas157
            Stas157 31 May 2016 08: 52
            +5
            Quote: Cat Man Null
            - And you, from a campaign, from turbopatriots will be?

            And, again you!)) Lover to get personal! You are not changing your habit of discussing not articles, but members of the forum! Explain, please, what does your label "turbopatriots" that you hang on me mean?
            1. Cat man null
              Cat man null 31 May 2016 09: 55
              -2
              Quote: Stas157
              And, again, you!)) A lover of personality!

              - welcome hi
              - I’m not going anywhere and for anything .. it was just a question request

              Quote: Stas157
              You do not change your habit, discuss not articles, but forum users!

              - you see .. there is nothing to discuss in the article, but I voiced the only thought, a possible thought "about the article" .. and even added the correct video tongue

              Quote: Stas157
              Explain, please, what does your label "turbopatriots" that you hang on me mean?

              - this is the one who believes that everything is terribly bad, and does not hesitate to voice it constantly (! this is important!). They used to say about such people "holier than the Pope" wink

              Quote: Stas157
              The Yeltsin Center designed, considered what achievements to show

              - in my opinion, everything turned out quite intelligibly. If it is not clear what - please contact, I will try to clarify yes
              1. Stas157
                Stas157 31 May 2016 10: 27
                +2
                Quote: Cat Man Null
                welcome

                Have a nice one you too!
                Quote: Cat Man Null
                - this is the one who believes that everything is terribly bad, and does not hesitate to voice it constantly (! this is important!). They used to say about such people "holier than the Pope"

                Thanks to you, I will learn a lot about myself! By the way, in life, I try to be optimistic, and my answer about Putin, it was an irony that still touched you for the living.
                1. Cat man null
                  Cat man null 31 May 2016 10: 35
                  0
                  Quote: Stas157
                  my answer about Putin, it was irony

                  - about how belay
                  - then I definitely stepped repeat

                  Quote: Stas157
                  which still touched you for a living

                  - not at all and nirazu
                  - I just asked a question wink
  5. standing
    standing 31 May 2016 06: 31
    +12
    He may be smart. Like Kasparov. Or maybe even smarter. But it does not bring any benefit to Russia. Like Kasparov.
    1. Stas157
      Stas157 31 May 2016 07: 47
      +4
      Quote: standing
      He may be smart. Like Kasparov. Or maybe even smarter. But it does not bring any benefit to Russia. Like Kasparov.

      Give Kudrin at least one clever phrase! I never understood him, on the contrary Glazyev, it’s very clear, he explains complicated things on the fingers!
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 07: 59
        +4
        Quote: Stas157
        , opposite Glazyev, it’s extremely clear that he explains complicated things on his fingers!

        Wow, it turns out that the economy is simply arranged. And why the hell is studying to become an economist when it’s enough to read one article by Glazyev and you can successfully manage the Central Bank.
        1. matross
          matross 31 May 2016 08: 30
          +1
          Bravo, Alexander, right to the point! Everyone knows how to boost the economy, cure any disease and solve the crime. wink
          It is not in vain that Putin keeps Glazyev in advisers and no more and even pulled Kudryu out of mothballs ... The laws of economics at the macro level have stopped working, politics are steering, and no one seems to know how to steer into a quiet and satisfying harbor ...
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Stas157
          Stas157 31 May 2016 09: 05
          +7
          Quote: Alexander Romanov
          just read one Glazyev article and you can successfully manage the Central Bank.

          Do you make fun?)) Of course, not enough! But, you know, I have long understood one thing that can simply talk about the complex, it understands the subject much better than the one who is difficult to talk about the simple, for example, Glazyev and Katasonov on the one hand, and Kudrin, Siluanov and Ulyukaev on the other.
          1. Alexander Romanov
            Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 11: 02
            +1
            Quote: Stas157
            But, you know, I have long understood one thing that can simply talk about the complex, it understands the subject much better than the one who is difficult to talk about the simple, for example, Glazyev and Katasonov on the one hand, and Kudrin, Siluanov and Ulyukaev on the other.

            Kudrin, I cross out, but as for the others, do you like beautiful words? You're a girl? No, then I don’t understand what the hell you like with your ears.
        4. 34 region
          34 region 31 May 2016 10: 34
          0
          07.59. Do not believe it! Nabiullina rules, Serdyukov rules, Shoigu rules. So you can! Even a security officer can rule the country! The main thing is to be confident!
      2. avva2012
        avva2012 31 May 2016 08: 43
        +4
        Quote: Stas157 opposite Glazyev, it’s extremely clear that he explains complicated things on his fingers!
        Oh yes, it’s very clear!
        "Within 3 years, reduce the share of state and municipal property: - the share of state participation in the authorized capital of the corporate sector from 50% to 30%."

        Reloaded relations with the West. It must be recognized that in conditions of real technological dependence on imports, isolation from the West makes the task of technological modernization of the Russian economy practically impossible. ”
        “Increase external borrowing, including the corporate and banking sector; If necessary, increase external budget borrowings to 20-30% of GDP. ”

        “Stimulating the development of medium and small financial institutions that have fallen into particularly difficult financial situations (a trap of high regulatory burden, liquidity shortages and low demand for extra-expensive loans)."
        They want to remove state-owned banks from the market, lower regulatory oversight, and give more cheap money to private banks that have suffered so much from the crisis. Apparently, the authors of the program expected that when reading this paragraph Putin would see tears of pity for the unfortunate moneylenders in his eyes.
        View in full: http://politrussia.com/ekonomika/oba-khuzhe-blits-analiz-468/
  6. Sars
    Sars 31 May 2016 06: 31
    +19
    To collect all these clever people (Kudrins, Medvedevs, Ulyukaevs, together with the entire liberal community) in a separate territory, and let them build a separately taken Euro-liberal state, and leave the rest alone.
    1. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 31 May 2016 06: 59
      +13
      Yes, we already have this, Moscow. The rest of Russia is zamkadysh ..
      Quote: SarS
      To collect all these clever people (Kudrins, Medvedevs, Ulyukaevs, together with the entire liberal community) in a separate territory, and let them build a separately taken Euro-liberal state, and leave the rest alone.
    2. asiat_61
      asiat_61 31 May 2016 10: 23
      0
      We have a lot of undeveloped islands. So you can define them there. The islands, that would not be able to escape.
  7. apro
    apro 31 May 2016 06: 33
    +5
    The question is different, why is this figure being advertised again? They give their wrecking views? After all, the result of his wrecking activity is a decline in the living standard of the population.
    1. Karabin
      Karabin 31 May 2016 06: 54
      +3
      Quote: apro
      The question is different, why is this figure advertised again?

      Evil tongues talk about replacing an iPhone.
      1. Stas157
        Stas157 31 May 2016 07: 51
        +4
        Quote: Karabin
        Evil tongues talk about replacing an iPhone.

        Putin does not give up! Wise, calm! Let even the entire Olympic team be disqualified!
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 08: 00
          +2
          Quote: Stas157
          Putin does not give up! Wise, calm! Let even the entire Olympic team be disqualified!

          Is dope poured into the throats of athletes?
          1. Stas157
            Stas157 31 May 2016 09: 13
            +8
            Not myself, of course! And, do you think Mudko should be responsible for what is happening in his department?
            1. Thunderbolt
              Thunderbolt 31 May 2016 13: 05
              0
              Mudko speaks English. It doesn’t work out in sports, you can put on diplomatic work wink .
              1. Platonich
                Platonich 31 May 2016 14: 46
                -1
                Fucking, shameful Englishman, in bl ... found Vova the minister, and in fact unsinkable offal!
                1. Manul
                  Manul 31 May 2016 21: 48
                  0
                  Quote: Platonitch
                  Fucking, shameful Englishman, in bl ... found Vova the minister, and in fact unsinkable offal!

                  Maybe Mutko speaks badly of English, but this is one of the best former party functionaries who really knows how to work. And if it weren’t for him, our football, and all the sport, might have already been at the back of the planet. So be quiet if you don’t know what are you talking about.
                  1. yehat
                    yehat 1 June 2016 10: 42
                    +2
                    he can and knows how to work, only works more for himself than for the country
              2. 34 region
                34 region 31 May 2016 15: 32
                0
                Stormbreaker! 13.05/XNUMX. With such a Russian accent owns?
  8. Cat man null
    Cat man null 31 May 2016 06: 33
    +6
    IMHO just about Kudrin said (3.30 - 3.37 in the video):

    1. Karabin
      Karabin 31 May 2016 06: 56
      +12
      Are there not too many enemies at the throne? And are they enemies for the king?
      1. Cat man null
        Cat man null 31 May 2016 07: 26
        -4
        Quote: Karabin
        Are there not too many enemies at the throne? And are they enemies for the king?

        Did you want to say something, or so, purely out of curiosity? wink
        1. Alexander Romanov
          Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 07: 38
          +1
          Quote: Cat Man Null

          You wanted to say something

          Yes, he’s just a troll sitting.
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null 31 May 2016 07: 40
            +1
            Quote: Alexander Romanov
            Yes, he’s just a troll sitting ...

            ... or just "points" earns laughing
      2. Stas157
        Stas157 31 May 2016 09: 16
        +6
        Quote: Karabin
        Are there not too many enemies at the throne? And are they enemies for the king?

        In my opinion, not in the eyebrow, but in the eye!
        1. Thunderbolt
          Thunderbolt 31 May 2016 13: 53
          +2
          But why did Stalin wage an open struggle with Trotsky and the Trotskyites? Not the chairman of the Council of People's Commissars, Lev Davidovich, participated in the government of the country, but he already hid in Mexico, and even that didn’t help?
          All this resembles the story of Ivanov and his Glonass (HIS, because HE was responsible for this direction. The truth, as it turned out, did not personally answer --- which became the norm for Russia).
          Remember, when he was asked, they say, how could it be --- he elegantly replied that everyone knew everything for several years, but "they were afraid to scare it away!" That is how, a secret operation. abandoned natural modesty stop Endurance and truth like a scout. Let everyone ask himself the question: "Could he just as valiantly, without showing any sign, supervise a large project and stoically observe how your subordinates steal government money and send it across the cordon or shove it into luxury goods and elite mansions? But you need to hold working meetings with thieves, maintain business relations. " I’m afraid to imagine what kind of reward AMU deserves when the National Guard will be given the go-ahead (since perestroika to infiltrate the gang of St. Petersburg liberals and endure their mischief ...?) When will this happen already? It seems like they wanted to kick around after the Medvedev and Co. Limpiada. Precisely "after", not "before." Otherwise, because of Okiyan, they will begin to harm our Limpiadushka. For Okiyan, they understood everything correctly and did not harm. Instead of our Olympiad, they very closely engaged in business in Ukraine. They brought their people to the pedestal of Ukrainian politics while we sledged. So, now there is a new term for a radical cleansing and restructuring of the system and methods of governing our state. fellow Only I don’t understand --- how will they help to kick our "elitists" in the head so that London and New York storage facilities are not filled with Russian state money from now on?
          1. 34 region
            34 region 31 May 2016 15: 38
            +1
            Stormbreaker! 13.53. What will it look like? Medvedev, you are arrested! Shoigu! Arrest Medvedev!
          2. Corsair
            Corsair 31 May 2016 18: 42
            +2
            Quote: Thunderbolt
            "Oh, I'm afraid to imagine what kind of reward I AM deserves when the National Guard is given the go-ahead (is it, since perestroika, to infiltrate the gang of Petersburg liberals and endure their pranks ...?)

            wassat National Guard? This is a tame army to fight not with Medved and Co., but with the people in the case of a shecher, well, or if the inter-belligerents begin, because the Army cannot be tied to this matter.
            You, dear, are so big and believe in fairy tales. Any government in modern times serves large capital, that is, a group of oligarchs, resource holders. Some kind of qualitative shift is not expected in the coming many many years, well, except maybe a serious war — and a new division.
  9. populist
    populist 31 May 2016 06: 36
    +9
    . Whether oil is worth $ 50 a barrel or 120 is not so important for kudrinomiki ... The important thing is that the "little egg" is, first of all, and no special expenses, even if these expenses are used to stimulate strategically important industries. So, even financing the modernization of the Russian army and the entire system of the domestic defense industry by Aleksei Leonidovich Kudrin was almost hostile. They say that you can’t spend from the “capsule”, because a) “Russia has no enemies” and b) “what if the crisis?” As a result, it turned out that Russia has enemies, and that their number is fundamentally not related to whether there is a crisis in the yard or not a crisis.

    And why Putin reanimated (returned to political life) this curly wise man - wise curly man? Are there few representatives of the fifth column in the Kremlin? Why multiply their number in power corridors? belay stop
    1. Gray brother
      Gray brother 31 May 2016 06: 41
      +3
      Quote: populist
      Why multiply their number in power corridors?

      And what, interestingly, is one of the economic advisers in power?
      1. populist
        populist 31 May 2016 06: 59
        +1
        And what, interestingly, power ...

        Influence, old ties, etc.
        1. Gray brother
          Gray brother 31 May 2016 07: 16
          +5
          Quote: populist
          Influence, old ties, etc.

          And then why the rest?
          There are thirty such influences (including Glazyev), and each has its own opinion.
          1. olimpiada15
            olimpiada15 31 May 2016 07: 42
            +7
            Quote: Gray Brother

            There are thirty such influences (including Glazyev), and each has its own opinion.

            And do not say that each of them has their own opinion - the vast majority of those present have one opinion: to integrate into the world economy at all costs and fill their pockets by any means and the fate of the country and its people is indifferent to them.
            Just voiced the opinion of the majority of Kudrin, and in a soft form, for
            1) we are not talking about supporting roles, but about the role of an extras or lackey, following the instructions of the owners;
            2) Kudrin prudently ignored the indifference to the fate of the country and the people of large Russian business.
            In general, it is rational to keep the mouthpiece of the internal enemy close. This is me about Kudrin.
            1. Volzhanin
              Volzhanin 31 May 2016 08: 24
              +6
              It is advisable to neutralize the internal enemy in the early stages.
            2. Gray brother
              Gray brother 31 May 2016 08: 32
              +2
              Quote: olimpiada15
              And do not say that each of them has their own opinion - the vast majority of those present have one opinion: to integrate into the world economy at all costs and fill their pockets by any means and the fate of the country and its people is indifferent to them.

              Do not smack nonsense, you do not even know the names of these others, and their opinion is unknown to you and even more so.

              This is what I wrote above, they heard the name Kudrin and that’s all, their eyes are gathered together - Kudrin is in focus and they no longer see anyone and nothing.
      2. Stas157
        Stas157 31 May 2016 07: 59
        +4
        Quote: Gray Brother
        And what, interestingly, is one of the economic advisers in power?

        Mediated. Affects, one way or another, the decisions of the president. Advisor helps make a decision. If he was not interested he would not be there! Who and how Putin chooses advisers is not entirely clear, since such traitors as Illarionov are among them!
  10. sa-ag
    sa-ag 31 May 2016 06: 39
    +3
    Kudrin was invited to return, help was needed to see him, Kudrin announced the conditions for return
    pathos rang out for the electorate, let’s look at the development of events, something tells me that despite the pathos, the conditions will be accepted

    Quote: Andrey Yurievich
    we have a crisis of economists? besides kudrin, is there no one to listen to?


    Well, not every economist worked in the St. Petersburg city hall :-)
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 31 May 2016 07: 45
      +8
      voiced return conditions for the electorate
      Putin's lovers closed their ears and eyes. Only the conditions are known. retirement no earlier than 65, forget about indexing pensions to reduce the cost of medicine and science. All these requests will be fulfilled after these elections, after the election of Putin, privatization will be completed!
      1. your1970
        your1970 31 May 2016 08: 31
        +1
        And in France on strike, Putin is also to blame there, that THEIR government increases the retirement age and lengthens the working day ??????
        Global trend: several global crises in a row, a decrease in the number of children after WWII, etc.
        1. 34 region
          34 region 31 May 2016 10: 48
          +3
          Svo1970! 08.31. No. There Gulchatay shows his true face. Without makeup. Like?
          1. your1970
            your1970 31 May 2016 11: 58
            0
            Lots of options?
            Only two, either October or Maidan ..
            Which option do you like in France?
            1. 34 region
              34 region 31 May 2016 15: 41
              0
              Svo1970! 11.58. Better October. Who will be the chief of the Russian General Staff Potapov? Who is in the role of Lenin?
              1. your1970
                your1970 31 May 2016 18: 02
                0
                And in France was Lenin ??? And when was Oktyabrskaya there ??? repeat repeat repeat

                For France, both options are bad, but as for us ..
                I don’t believe that if either the first or the second happens, it’s better for ordinary people to live (see the 404 country — they bloomed there a lot after they defeated Yanukovych’s corrupt officials)
                1. yehat
                  yehat 1 June 2016 17: 16
                  0
                  in France to Lenin fussed
        2. yehat
          yehat 1 June 2016 10: 50
          0
          everything is much more commonplace. In the global economy, there is a growing number of parasites who unfairly trade entities that suck out a very significant part of the planet’s economy.
          What do you think, if someone builds trillion-dollar carriers and runs other programs with the same price tag, is he paying for it? And where are the billionaire states of speculators? Do they then earn 50 million per month? Not at all, those who shared their income honestly or not quite pay for it. Hence the growing problems.
  11. Odysseus
    Odysseus 31 May 2016 06: 40
    +12
    The question is not in Kudrin himself (everything is clear with him), the question is why such figures continue to largely determine the socio-economic policy in the country?
    As for Kudrin’s statement, his arrogance strikes him, because he knows very well that the attempt to integrate into the Western world as a junior partner failed not at all because the Russian authorities abandoned this idea, but because the West does not want to accept Russia in this quality. He wants complete submission (as in Ukraine).
    Nevertheless, it is precisely this idea that Kudrin continues to promote at the highest level.
    1. Volzhanin
      Volzhanin 31 May 2016 08: 27
      0
      But can they break the comedy for the Westerners and prepare a momentary pile? Are they quietly neighing?
      Identity option ... what
  12. jetfors_84
    jetfors_84 31 May 2016 06: 41
    +8
    What does "integrate into technological chains" mean? To stand where the "Western partners" will indicate? They do not see us except as a raw material appendage. According to Kudrin, is this the place of Russia?
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 31 May 2016 07: 48
      +4
      . According to Kudrin, is this the place of Russia?
      Alas, you are right, only this opinion is not only of Mudrin, but also of the one who called him there.
    2. olimpiada15
      olimpiada15 31 May 2016 07: 49
      +2
      [quote = jetfors_84] What does it mean to "integrate into technological chains? [quote]
      This is a public place in the auxiliary room, where everyone goes ...
  13. askort154
    askort154 31 May 2016 06: 45
    +12
    The meaning of gaydaro-kudriekonomiki, not the creation of tools of production and goods, but to save finances
    to buy an already finished product in the "global economy". Instead of a fishing rod, buy fish.
    Kudrin is a good accountant, but not a financial strategy and politician. In vain, the GDP constantly publicly emphasizes that they are in good, friendly relations. In vain!
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 31 May 2016 07: 49
      +7
      In vain!
      Why so? Sometimes you need to tell the truth.
  14. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 31 May 2016 06: 45
    0
    Not far from Gaidar. Yes, only the Kremlin now employs people who know very well where such smart liberal speeches can lead the country.
    Kudrin in the expert economic council with his "dissenting opinion" was not himself. He was introduced there by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
    Normally, albeit side by side, under supervision.
    1. Stas157
      Stas157 31 May 2016 08: 12
      +5
      Quote: LÄRZ
      Normally, albeit side by side, under supervision.

      What can they steal? Maybe then to jail? More reliable!
  15. mamont5
    mamont5 31 May 2016 06: 48
    -2
    Quote: dmi.pris
    Dear Putin ... And it was not under our and your president that the kudrins, Siluanovs, Chubais and the like rose ... Why (didn’t you think about it?) The guarantor will not slam this shop. Or they are crystal honest .. Or maybe they just shared!

    Because GDP, as a true leader, is trying to maintain a balance between diametrically opposed branches of government. He listens to everyone, but ... the decision is his own. I also do not like Medvedev, Kudrin and others like them, but ... I envy the patience and talent of the GDP, which successfully maneuvers between power opposites.
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 31 May 2016 06: 52
      +9
      Quote: mamont5
      I envy the patience and talent of the GDP, which successfully maneuvers between power opposites.

      interesting what is the purpose of these maneuvers? After all, no ultimate goal has been voiced for society and the country, why are these victims? In my opinion, the instinct for self-preservation is already prevailing here.
    2. Stas157
      Stas157 31 May 2016 08: 27
      +8
      Quote: mamont5
      Because GDP, as a true leader, is trying to maintain a balance between diametrically opposed branches of government.

      What are the opposite branches of government? Why should Putin appoint people himself in order to maneuver between them?
      Does he depend on them or vice versa?
      It seems that Putin himself does not know what to build on and what it will look like, so he scored it from everywhere! He did not have an economic program before; he does not have it even now.
      1. asiat_61
        asiat_61 31 May 2016 10: 39
        +3
        According to the Constitution, ideology is prohibited. There is no idea, no goal, no goal, no plan. This is a dead end.
      2. 34 region
        34 region 31 May 2016 10: 54
        +2
        Stas157! 08.27. Why is there no program? There is a program. Put everything in private hands. That's the whole point of the program. True, these private enterprises are constantly bankrupt for some reason, but they work very efficiently, according to management.
        1. avva2012
          avva2012 31 May 2016 11: 18
          +2
          Quote: 34 region Put everything in private hands. That's the whole point of the program. True, these private enterprises are constantly bankrupt for some reason, but they work very efficiently, according to management.

          Why go bankrupt, and so it is clear. Effective managers work under the strict guidance of.
          I read recently about Bulgaria.
          "We can't even find out who, in fact, owns what ?! Who are these people? These are international companies, sometimes offshore, registered in the middle of nowhere. For example, the company to which the largest gold mine Chelopech was sold for only $ 2 million is registered in Canada. Bulgaria relies on a ridiculous 2 percent of the gold mined. And the trick is that we have no right to find out HOW MUCH gold is mined at the mine and from what count this same 2 percent. For 23 years since our perestroika, Bulgaria, which had excellent production and the best agricultural land in the region, has become the poorest country in Europe. " "And our American friends slap us on the shoulder and say:" Well done, guys! You have democracy! " One Bulgarian satirist very precisely defined what democracy is: "This is not the rule of the people. This is the rule of the democrats." How dying Bulgaria: EU, self-immolation, Russophobia and Russophiliahttp://rusvesna.su/r...ions/1464600694
    3. mihasik
      mihasik 31 May 2016 09: 26
      +5
      Quote: mamont5
      I envy the patience and talent of the GDP, which successfully maneuvers between power opposites.

      But why?
      Why create “difficulties” for ourselves and for the whole country in the form of the Kudrins in order to “heroically” overcome and “maneuver” them?
      Is it political masochism or uncertainty about the correctness of their actions and, as a result, fear for the consequences?
  16. Monster_Fat
    Monster_Fat 31 May 2016 06: 53
    +16
    "To reduce the degree of international tension", in the opinion of Mr. "NEDAM" (this is how Mr. "K" is called ambiguously in the Kremlin lobby), this is "to sacrifice Syria" and, first of all, to "give" Assad to the Americans. Generally speaking, the pragmatist-accountant Mr. "K" is a person who sincerely "hates" with all his "accounting" soul such branches of the economy and state structures as "social" and "military", which in his opinion should be minimal in the state. He has always consistently opposed military and social spending, without hiding expressed his point of view on these issues, in the key that the military component of the state should be minimal and the state should provide itself with protection and authority in the world arena through diplomatic means. As for the "social sphere", his plans were always the same - "pay" as little as possible from the state to pensioners and other recipients of social payments in order to "stimulate" citizens to conduct "economic and labor" activities up to the "grave" and in "any conditions ". His plans were also on the territory of Russia, namely: the wide transfer of Russian lands for lease and concessions to everyone from abroad for a long time, under the guarantees of the state, arguing that since we ourselves cannot "develop" our territories, then let then, "foreigners" do it for us.
    1. Amurets
      Amurets 31 May 2016 07: 24
      +6
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      As for the "social sphere", his plans were always the same - "pay" as little as possible from the state to pensioners and other recipients of social payments in order to "stimulate" citizens to conduct "economic and labor" activities up to the "grave" and in "any conditions ".

      So he must be sent to the mining industry, so that he knows where the country's wealth comes from and block his accounts, so that he can live on the salary that the "Severs" receive. Maybe the "Dutch disease" will pass away. This disease cannot be cured by medicine. It is treated with hard work in the fresh air, although the treatment period is long, at least 5 years.
    2. olimpiada15
      olimpiada15 31 May 2016 08: 12
      +3
      Yes, unfortunately it is precisely this point of view that is present not only in Kudrin, but also in the entire economic bloc. But they do not think about the consequences for the country of such an economic policy. They follow the path of least resistance to external forces, so it’s easier for them.
      Real leadership in industry, construction and agriculture is difficult, not for their abilities, and there is no desire to equip and develop the country. For them, income should be limited as a nominal presence at work (63 rubles / hour). They reduced the work to overseeing a number of digital indicators, where the well-being of the picture is ensured by the depreciation of the ruble.
    3. 34 region
      34 region 31 May 2016 11: 01
      +5
      Monster! 06.53. He has a strange passion for saving. If he so loves to save, then officials and deputies, according to his logic, should receive a minimum wage and walk (to save money). Does he also give his wife to foreigners? Or himself?
  17. populist
    populist 31 May 2016 06: 56
    +1
    He was introduced there by Russian President Vladimir Putin. If you entered for the purpose of activity in contrast, then this is one thing.

    It seems that for this very "contrast". But contrasting and without it "above the roof". what
  18. samarin1969
    samarin1969 31 May 2016 07: 01
    +3
    The question is not Kudrin ... The question is, what made the Guarantor return to his services?

    "false glasses", except for disgust, do not cause other feelings. But Mr. Volodin is too unconvincing in his "cosmodrome" argumentation.
    1) the technological backlog is more than serious;
    2) not a single candidate for Lee Kuan Yu is visible in the economic bargain
  19. rf xnumx
    rf xnumx 31 May 2016 07: 02
    +10
    According to the ex-minister of finance, “Russia has technologically lagged behind, and it needs to integrate into international technological relations at least on the sidelines”
    It's like this, he always offers
  20. Nonna
    Nonna 31 May 2016 07: 04
    +12
    Stalin would have known for a long time what to do with such an omission
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 31 May 2016 07: 53
      +7
      Stalin would have known for a long time
      Do not touch Stalin! Kudrin didn’t sit in the Kremlin’s office himself. Obama and Erdogan appointed him there.
      1. Alexander Romanov
        Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 08: 20
        -4
        Quote: Gardamir
        Do not touch Stalin!

        Ahahahaha wassat
      2. avva2012
        avva2012 31 May 2016 08: 59
        -2
        Quote: Gardamir Kudrin didn’t sit in the Kremlin’s office himself. Obama and Erdogan appointed him there.

        Textbook of Logic- Year: 1915/2010 Author: Chelpanov Georgii Ivanovich Genre: Logic Publisher: M .: Scientific Library.
        1. Gardamir
          Gardamir 31 May 2016 14: 06
          +5
          And what do you dislike about my logic. In today's Russia, Putin is responsible for all the good, For flaws, Obama, Poroshenko, Erdogan.
  21. Karabin
    Karabin 31 May 2016 07: 04
    +16
    Putin said that he would protect this sovereignty "not only as president, but also until the end of his life."

    Pathetic, but convincing.

    This guarantor knows how.
    Another thing is that Mr. Kudrin did not appear to be in the expert economic council with his “dissenting opinion”. He was introduced there by Russian President Vladimir Putin. If introduced for the purpose of activity in contrast,
    Why not. Kudrin does one thing. Putin snobbishly says something else. The contrast is in favor of the "tsar-sovereign". And the economy, as it was according to Gaidar-Chubais-Kudrin, has remained. Kudrinomics, she is Putinomics, and no other is planned. So the oil has risen. All in the suit.
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 31 May 2016 07: 09
      +5
      Quote: Karabin
      So the oil rose. All in the suit.

      The Chinese Rosneft want to acquire, or rather management
      1. Karabin
        Karabin 31 May 2016 08: 42
        +2
        Quote: sa-ag
        The Chinese Rosneft want to acquire, or rather management

        Why not. Import substitution. Not all Westerners wink
        1. yehat
          yehat 1 June 2016 17: 22
          0
          Quote: Karabin

          Why not.

          because we ourselves must extract profit and direct it not to "investors" (are they creating new oil ???), but to citizens of the country for social needs, which are very underfunded.
  22. volodya
    volodya 31 May 2016 07: 04
    +7
    These curls and chubais had to be sent to their beloved America for a long time
  23. Shelest2000
    Shelest2000 31 May 2016 07: 16
    +3
    Quote: Odyssey
    The question is not in Kudrin himself (everything is clear with him), the question is why such figures continue to largely determine the socio-economic policy in the country?
    As for Kudrin’s statement, his arrogance strikes him, because he knows very well that the attempt to integrate into the Western world as a junior partner failed not at all because the Russian authorities abandoned this idea, but because the West does not want to accept Russia in this quality. He wants complete submission (as in Ukraine).
    Nevertheless, it is precisely this idea that Kudrin continues to promote at the highest level.

    Tell me who your friend is (in this case, an adviser) and I will tell you who you are.
    T.ch. nothing surprising.
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 31 May 2016 07: 31
      0
      Quote: Shelest2000
      Tell me who your friend is (in this case, an adviser) and I will tell you who you are.

      - Well, there Glazyev walks in advisers, no? He walks with you in goodies, I hope? wink
      1. Volzhanin
        Volzhanin 31 May 2016 08: 41
        +2
        Not anymore!
        In light of this: http://politrussia.com/ekonomika/oba-khuzhe-blits-analiz-468/
        one gets the feeling that we, i.e. the people of Russia, they certainly have any kind of deal, and they pull us into deep-rooted capitalism, both of them. Those who have already seized money and power at the turn of 1980-2000 consider it necessary to fix this situation forever.
  24. drop
    drop 31 May 2016 07: 42
    +6
    With the development of the defense industry complex to eliminate the backlog in any areas of technology, we created a complex of research institutes in Zelenograd (radio electronics), production of screens (Voronezh), supercomputers (Elbrus), over-the-horizon radars (RTI named after Mints) and much more. They did not seek any relief in geopolitics. We have evolved. At the enterprises under my jurisdiction 6GU MCI of the USSR, the GDP growth rate was 15-20%. In four years, 6 new research institutes and factories were built and commissioned. What this Kudrin is talking about cannot be understood by a normal leader and statesman. His place is not in the Council, but in a landfill. For a long time such hangers-on will still be wrested under the leadership of the country. Shame. I have the honor.
    1. yehat
      yehat 1 June 2016 17: 30
      0
      You may have honor, but knowledge is not enough.
      To push the economy at such a rate, an economic base or "sales market" of a certain size is needed. The USSR had at least 500 million people, and I think even more.
      Russia now has 200 million on its strength, but I think even less - about 150 million people.
      We can now, in the BEST case (when the Duma doesn’t saw, there is only one bank and it does not work for profit, and the OBXSS deals with Rotenbergs) grow 3 times slower than in the USSR.
      I would say that the real (without cunning in statistics) growth rate of the indexed GDP indicator of production of 2-3 percent is a gorgeous indicator, comparable to the successful growth of the German economy in the 30s.
      and now guess 3 times - why in the West they scream about the threat of the Russian Federation and the threat of attack? Because our economy needs expansion, and the West does not want to let us grow in any way. She (expansion) has 3 ways
      1. culture, scientific and technical progress, and probably the concept of national honor.
      2. like China's financial and commodity seepage
      3. on a visit to the tank, as Germany arranged from 1939 to 1941.
      Our country is moving by all three.
  25. 31rus2
    31rus2 31 May 2016 07: 43
    +3
    Dear, do you live in another country? That’s Kudrin, the whole economic policy of Russia has gone and is following the same course, and who, if not Kudrin himself, will take this course best of all, the president is not going to change economic policy, the government is already shouting cheers at 50 oil per barrel , the sanctions will be lifted and we’ll live again in paradise, to put someone else, so this is breaking or at least restructuring the entire system, that is, a new government, and this is a taboo
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 31 May 2016 07: 51
      +1
      Quote: 31rus2
      ? That's Kudrin, the whole economic policy of Russia has gone and is going the same course, and who, if not Kudrin himself, will best embody this course,

      And then what Kudrin is not satisfied?
  26. anfil
    anfil 31 May 2016 07: 48
    +5
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    Quote: Putin
    I think not.
    Surely, our father, Vladimir Vladimirovich, without knowing about betrayal, he warmed the vile bespectacled snake - Alyoshka Kudrin on his chest ?! You must then immediately "Treason!" shout! And that Alyoshka should be dragged into the Secret Order on the rack - let him admit, the dog, at whose hostile instigation he "kudrinomiki" his ruin to the Russian state repaired!


    Keep your friends close, enemies even closer - said Machiavelli. Machiavelli, Machiavelli Niccolo di Bernardo (1469 - 1527) - Italian politician, writer, historian.
    People do not always correctly interpret this saying. This does not mean that you need to make your enemy a better friend, you just need to be well informed about all the intentions of your enemy. Get an informant in his organization. Know his steps, suppose his thoughts, take advantage of his weaknesses.
  27. sergo42
    sergo42 31 May 2016 07: 53
    +1
    This kudrinomist is always ready to join "international relations" in ANY POSITION
  28. Kudrevkn
    Kudrevkn 31 May 2016 08: 14
    +4
    In addition to the Program of my "brother" Alexei, there were 2 more: "conservative" Glazyev - Titov and "liberal" Ulyukaev! I will not talk about "conservatives" yet, but I should write especially about "liberal" Ulyukaev - I have never read such nonsense ?! THE MINISTER OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT proposes ... TO FREEZE DEMAND (salaries, pensions, benefits, etc.) until 2018 in order to STIMULATE SUPPLY, that is, ECONOMIC GROWTH ?! How do you like this "pearl": Marx and Samuelson turned over in their grave! And our "liberal market people" not gu-gu about this? But what about the basic law of the market: "Demand determines supply"? Maybe the head of the transport department and the main market player in the country, Mr. Dvorkovich (Medvedev), will answer us? Silence too! And you just pounced on the "brother": "What are you, Alekseyka, not a patriot and like a hamster" all in a burrow - you dump the American money-box "? receive slop on yourself? !!
    1. sa-ag
      sa-ag 31 May 2016 08: 21
      +10
      Quote: KudrevKN
      Maybe we will answer the head of the transport department and the main marketer in the country, Mr. Dvorkovich (Medvedev)?

      "- Elvira Nabiullina answers, please microphone" "Lending to the real sector of the economy will lead to an increase in inflation" (C)
      1. Corsair
        Corsair 31 May 2016 18: 57
        0
        Quote: sa-ag
        "- Elvira Nabiullina answers, please microphone" "Lending to the real sector of the economy will lead to an increase in inflation" (C)

        what Why - where did they get such data? Does the growth of the real sector of the economy not reduce this inflation? That's how we have been rinsing our brains for several years, stupidly transferring money to the currency back and forth, financing the stupid banking sector
        1. sa-ag
          sa-ag 1 June 2016 07: 45
          +1
          Quote: Corsair
          Does the growth of the real sector of the economy not reduce this inflation?

          Exactly so, the supply of commodity money supply is being filled, but here we see some sort of alternative economy, monetary ...
        2. Kudrevkn
          Kudrevkn 2 June 2016 09: 36
          0
          Not at all stupid. but very smart! Look here in November 2015, the rate of 1 US dollar is 43-46 rubles. or 13 gr. The rate of 1 hryvnia is 2,5 - 2,7 rubles. That is, we buy in or on Dill from Gontareva (NBU) bucks for 30 -32 rubles. for hryvnia and "drain" from Naebulina (Central Bank of the Russian Federation) at 43 -46? What is "volatility"? Already breathtaking from such profits ?! And most importantly "without noise and dust" - NO RISK TO HEALTH !? "Everything is clean and" honest "- there are no victims? How do you write: ... being engaged in stupid transfer of money into foreign currency back and forth"? What about "financing the banking sector stupidly?" I won't say anything - is it more expensive for me to explain the gray schemes of Yuldaeva-Naebulina? After all, I am the best anti-crisis banker in Russia!
      2. Kudrevkn
        Kudrevkn 2 June 2016 09: 25
        0
        Thanks! However, the citizens of Naebulina and Yuldaeva not only became famous for their "volatility" and
        "turbulence" in the foreign exchange market. but also a rather serious crime from the point of view of the West - the use of one's official position when providing Isider information to individual "players" in this very "volatile - foreign exchange" market? In the United States, you can get 50 years for this, but here ... A state prize and a diploma from the President? And also in my pocket several hundred million American rubles for tights and stilettos, in short, for every woman's whim ???
  29. Angara
    Angara 31 May 2016 08: 20
    +4
    Maybe it’s time to send Alexashka after Nemtsov so that he doesn’t have eyes and is not confused under his feet? what
  30. vladimirvn
    vladimirvn 31 May 2016 08: 20
    +7
    If you remember, during Yeltsin's time, Andryusha Kozyrev was the Minister of Foreign Affairs. A policy of endless concessions and appeasement of the West was pursued. The Americans patted him condescendingly on the shoulder and said "Dafai Andryusha, dafai" .., like keep up the good work. I felt no greater shame for our policy. am
  31. 1536
    1536 31 May 2016 08: 21
    +3
    Why waste time and torment the people. They would declare the liquidation of the state, the transfer of the territory under the control of foreign banks and monopolies, and that's it. Kudrin is the deputy governor, VVP is the commander-in-chief of all armed formations. And the people, what the people? No money, hold on here. It's not here for you, you know!
  32. Mengad
    Mengad 31 May 2016 08: 29
    +1
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    Quote: Gardamir
    maybe he’s like that?
    Well, if nothing has changed in four years, then yes smile

    The fact that the so-called Liberals of Russia spoiled the image and redefined the concept of Liberalism, and with this word we are associated with betrayal and meanness. In fact, not a word gives a characterization of the actions of certain figures .. and his case.
    Let me remind you: Liberalism (from Latin liberalis - free) is a philosophical and socio-political movement that proclaims the inviolability of human rights and individual freedoms.
    Liberalism proclaims the rights and freedoms of each person as the supreme value and establishes them as the legal basis of social and economic order. Moreover, the ability of the state and the church to influence the life of society is limited by the constitution. The most important freedoms in modern liberalism are the freedom to speak out publicly, the freedom to choose a religion, the freedom to choose representatives in fair and free elections. In economic terms, the principles of liberalism are the inviolability of private property, freedom of trade and business. In legal terms, the principles of liberalism are the rule of law over the will of rulers and the equality of all citizens before the law, regardless of their wealth, position and influence. (Wikipedia) So let's judge by cases.
  33. ver_
    ver_ 31 May 2016 08: 36
    +1
    Quote: dmi.pris
    Dear Putin ... And it was not under our and your president that the kudrins, Siluanovs, Chubais and the like rose ... Why (didn’t you think about it?) The guarantor will not slam this shop. Or they are crystal honest .. Or maybe they just shared!

    ... Duc - Kladinets’s sword has not yet been harbored by craftsmen .. On the contrary, they can fight against the evil spirits ... but in the meantime they only have to maneuver, but they have to defend themselves by the procession ..
  34. Yakut14
    Yakut14 31 May 2016 08: 39
    +3
    Well, again, the old reformer dragged on the old bagpipes, the reformer. And he is trying to put us again under the Americans, you see, the GDP has moved away from the general line of the Amerovsk regional committee. Drive it up to you! There is no place for him in the economic bloc.
  35. Evgen2x
    Evgen2x 31 May 2016 08: 51
    +2
    I’m even confused, doesn’t seem like a fool, is a traitor pure water? Well, so clearly explicit ?? That which offers obvious crap.
    1. Al1977
      Al1977 2 June 2016 17: 58
      0
      Quote: Evgen2x
      I’m even confused, doesn’t seem like a fool, is a traitor pure water?

      Are you talking about Putin or Kudrin?
  36. fif21
    fif21 31 May 2016 08: 56
    +2
    Kudrin’s statement confirms that politics, the army, and special services are only an instrument in the main world war, which never ended, in an economic war. Therefore, in war, as in war, tactics and strategy. Kudrin is a faithful servant of the mattress model of the economic world order. If investments are necessarily foreign, in money, the dollar is more important than the ruble, if the west said that the Russian Federation is a raw materials appendage, then so be it am But to strain the brain and solve the problems of the development of Russian business is clearly not fate. request
    1.Businesses need cheap loans (and not necessarily in foreign currency).
    2.Business needs investments (any! Not only western)
    3. The economy needs growth (which means it needs markets, a consumer boom in the country and trade in goods, not raw materials)
    The Economic Council under the President of the Russian Federation is even more important than the Security Council. hi
  37. 31rus2
    31rus2 31 May 2016 08: 57
    +1
    Dear, until the president himself changes the approach to the economy, there will not be any changes, it is the president who decides which course to take, and then Kudrin, Ulyukaev, etc., why Kudrin is only an adviser, but because the economic opposition is stronger and not take it , as it was no longer possible before, since to find strong support both in parties and among the people, here Putin invited Kudrin as an adviser, just as for example the complete opposite of Glazyev
  38. Karabin
    Karabin 31 May 2016 08: 59
    +2
    anfil (2) RU Today, 07:48 AM
    \
    Keep your friends close, your enemies even closer - Machiavelli said.
    Flinky (4) SU Today, 07:18 ↑
    Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer.
    Cat Man Null (2) Today, 06:33 AM
    IMHO just about Kudrin said (3.30 - 3.37 in the video):

    With training manuals?
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 31 May 2016 09: 04
      0
      Quote: Karabin
      anfil (2) RU Today, 07:48
      Keep your friends close, your enemies even closer - Machiavelli said.
      Flinky (4) SU Today, 07:18
      Keep your friends close and your enemies even closer.
      Cat Man Null (2) Today, 06:33
      IMHO just about Kudrin said (3.30 - 3.37 in the video):

      With training manuals?

      - Well, the stump is clear, the head is not cooking already laughing
      - I came up with the first one .. and the others were so sorry ... it’s not good to do this negative
  39. The comment was deleted.
  40. 31rus2
    31rus2 31 May 2016 09: 07
    +3
    Another important factor has now begun the process of lifting the sanctions, but in connection with the events in Crimea, many of our officials are under personal sanctions, and Kudrin is "clean", here is a figure in the negotiations, that is, he will be asking for investments, loans, but we are not we can't
  41. mihasik
    mihasik 31 May 2016 09: 08
    +4
    Well, now about the answer to Mr. Kudrin from Vladimir Putin. According to the president, if Russia is somehow behind, this is not a reason to trade its own sovereignty, given the country's history of a thousand-year history. Putin said that he would protect this sovereignty "not only as president, but also until the end of his life."

    From this it follows that Putin, as it were, did not want to return Kudrin to power, but he was "convincingly asked"? So who then rules the country? A group of "faces"? Elites, clans, etc. does not mean we are not defeated, and Putin's plan to "tame" the elites failed? Or is he simply listening to the advice of his "senior comrades" in the form of Kissinger?
  42. Stalnov I.P.
    Stalnov I.P. 31 May 2016 09: 48
    +4
    Stupid, talentless, I can't say anything else about him, he created this system, and now he is criticizing. Outstanding leaders make their country a leader, and this team member contributed to the development of the crisis and all those phenomena that exist in our economy, and even after that "fancies himself as an unquenchable star", a pitiful little man who seized power. It is not clear how the president chooses a team for himself, then one clown, then the other not the government, but the CIRC.
  43. fridge
    fridge 31 May 2016 09: 54
    +3
    Kudrin, this is a deeply and gently mishandled Cossack, Kozyrev worked harder to the West.
  44. kirgudu
    kirgudu 31 May 2016 10: 13
    +6
    What for our country investment ???
    There is plenty of money in a little box, full of resources. No technology - buy, do not buy - steal.
  45. Million
    Million 31 May 2016 10: 14
    +5
    Putin trusts and respects Kudrin. And the majority of the Russian people have a different opinion about this policy
  46. Basil50
    Basil50 31 May 2016 10: 16
    +5
    In the article, a factual error, Kudrin unfastened the money in a small bottle that is stored in America. And everything related to the development of RUSSIA does not interest either Kudrin or his employers. Unsinkability and influence only from close ties with the United States, where Kudrin complained of a weakening influence on DA MEDVEDEV, for which he was dismissed.
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 31 May 2016 10: 24
      0
      Quote: Vasily50
      Kudrin unfastened money in a small bottle which is stored in America

      Hmm .. a bit of alphabet:

      - Kudrin bought American debt notes with American money
      - these receipts were not stored in America. They were stored in the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.
      - These receipts are highly liquid. That is, at any moment - even right now, even in the middle of the night - they can be sold for the same American money. If suddenly there was a need for this very money
      - these receipts, unlike money, generate income. Small but no money at all

      Shouting about "investment in industry" and so on is not worth it - the amount of this money in the Russian Federation is comparable to your monthly budget ... well, let's say, for travel by bus. And that's all.

      So understandable, I hope? wink

      Quote: Vasily50
      And all that is connected with the development of RUSSIA, neither Kudrin, nor his employers are interested

      - perhaps. But, fortunately, Kudrin (let's say in general - the Minister of Finance) is controlled. To the chairman of the government, for example. And not only.

      That's something like yes
      1. Corsair
        Corsair 31 May 2016 19: 09
        +1
        Quote: Cat Man Null
        - These receipts are highly liquid. That is, at any moment - even right now, even in the middle of the night - they can be sold for the same American money. If suddenly there was a need for this very money

        what There is a question - even if they are liquid, you can boil some vassals of Amer or China to the edge, but how does the inflation factor affect their price, the purchasing power of the same dollar greatly decreases with time.
        Will we be able to sell after a year (resale losses) and buy the same amount of a conditional product in the amount from the sale.
        Well, actually buying someone else’s receipts, we invested heavily in other countries, while we cry that there are no investments from abroad, the only difference being that foreign investments then take real resources or bankrupt our industry, and ours also lose their hefty operations.
      2. Basalaev
        Basalaev 1 June 2016 06: 50
        +4
        There are enough clever and competent managers and economists in Russia - the whole spectrum from communists and socialists to capitalist statesmen. But the proteges of the comprador capitalists rule. We have the most liberal and corrupt government and the Central Bank in the world. One storage of gold reserves abroad pulls on a betrayal of the homeland - it’s the same as receiving a salary, giving it to your neighbor — FOR STORAGE, leaving your family at a living wage. And your wife takes socks for children, travel to work and medicine takes money from your neighbor at a percentage. The wife gives interest by replacing the butter in your diet with palm oil and soy meat. Otherwise, the neighbor will not help her next time.
        Well, a neighbor still reduces your (stash) nest egg by declaring a crisis - the rats are supposed to be naughty, again they ate 25% of your noodles .... And you sigh, spread your arms, but yes you agree - it happens - rats roam and there is no council for them. And again you give him money for storage, and leave yourself and your family the family, so that you would not die of hunger.
    2. 31rus2
      31rus2 31 May 2016 10: 30
      +2
      I’ve fired a little for the fact that I didn’t want to accept the defense budget, I asked him to reduce it by half, and after that we parted with him, and of course + Medvedev
  47. Kenneth
    Kenneth 31 May 2016 10: 21
    +1
    It is interesting what would happen if in 2008 and 2014 this little egg would not have appeared. Here Ukrainians just without a egg.
  48. MATROSKIN-53
    MATROSKIN-53 31 May 2016 10: 26
    +1
    What is there to argue about? After all, Putin immediately replied to Kudrin that he did not intend to change his views and actions. And that's it! And to know the opinions and desires of "enemies" is very useful. Forewarned is forearmed!
  49. Mestny
    Mestny 31 May 2016 10: 35
    -2
    Quote: Gardamir
    Putin's lovers closed their ears and eyes.

    Putin is the President of the Russian Federation. The very country in which I live. You offer me to pour mud on it at every corner, how does your troll kodla do it?
    You propose to "break everything", so that "smart and honest" would come and then everything will be fine?
    Ага.
    In one country, there are already the results of such work according to the instructions of your owners, no need to go far.
    And I'm not going to twist one place here, in front of you here in the curtsy to squat that I say they will not accept a single batch. no, no, EdRo ...
    There is a party in power, it really makes decisions, in fact, the majority. I may not like these solutions. But only on this basis, I do not intend to water everything and everyone with the city and demand to "leave" according to the Ukrainian scenario.
    Only through elections, only according to the laws of the country to which I live.
    1. Gardamir
      Gardamir 31 May 2016 14: 09
      0
      In one country
      IN USSR?
      Supporters of Putin-liberal-anti-Soviet are the main enemies of Russia!
    2. years
      years 1 June 2016 19: 26
      0
      Quote: Mestny
      Only through elections, only according to the laws of the country to which I live

      Correctly said ... There is no other way.
  50. Knizhnik
    Knizhnik 31 May 2016 10: 39
    0
    Kenneth RU Today, 10:21 AM
    It is interesting what would happen if in 2008 and 2014 this little egg would not have appeared.

    +1
    The return of Kudrin is a message to the West. Invited specialist, provided that he will follow the words.