Military Review

Primaries in Russia

54
Primaries - what is it?


The primaries in Russia are a relatively new phenomenon. Our electoral system is quite seriously regulated. And such a phenomenon - PRIMERIZ.

"... we will initiate amendments to the federal law on political parties, which will enable the parties to conduct a preliminary vote to make personnel decisions," said Mr. Neverov.

For more information: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2994523.

It's not about securing the possibility of holding primaries. Strictly speaking, each party has the opportunity to hold primaries. The question of the legitimacy of political campaigning to the appointment of elections, and not only. But about everything in order.

1. The political party "United Russia" held a public event of federal significance, without having legal authority for this. That is why it is urgent to adopt a law on primaries. To legalize political election campaign prior to the announcement of elections. Thus, for some parties, election campaigning will be possible even before the announcement of elections.

The regulatory legal framework of the Russian Federation clearly regulates the activities of political parties related to the participation of candidates in various levels of elections. In addition, it must be remembered that each party has its own charter. According to this document, the procedures for the nomination of candidates. In particular: “The exclusive competence of the Congress includes: ... 8.3.5.11. nomination in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation by secret ballot of the federal list of candidates for deputies of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation and candidates for deputies of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation in single-mandate electoral districts ... ”(charter of the United Russia political party, http: // er .ru / party / rules / # 8). Thus, the United Russia, as it were, is divided into exclusive competence of the supreme governing body. That is, the highest governing body is subordinated to the results of the event, which does not have any legal basis, not regulated procedurally (at the legislative level).

Party CHARTER refers to the EXCLUSIVE COMPETENCE of the HIGHER GOVERNING BODY of the PARTY a number of issues. The solution of these issues can not be delegated to anyone. Even a part of these questions cannot be delegated to anyone. In fact, the primaries are the promise of the congress to nominate candidates for whom they voted.

There is a place for a legal assessment of the actions of the ruling party. Yes, it is more important to give a correct assessment to the ideological inspirers of the event called “PRIMERIES”.

In addition to purely legal contradictions, there are a number of points that I would like to draw attention to.

2. Each political party has its own vision of development. Very controversial statement about the usefulness of the primaries. The development of a political party is an exclusive matter of this political party itself. Speech in the case of the primaries is an open influence on the decision of independent political parties by an unknown contingent. Who votes on the primaries? Only members of this political party and non-party members voted on the United Russia primaries? And where is the guarantee that other political parties did not influence the decision?

A sufficiently large party has the ability to influence the decisions of another party. Members of "United Russia" will come to the primaries of the other party, vote for the "slop" candidates of the other party. It is convenient to choose weak opponents. Just do not need beautiful words about honesty and the desire to "fight" with strong rivals. Primaries are a tool to influence the activities of other political parties. Making lists of non-party members of other parties is not a recipe. Insane complication of the political system for the whim of the advertising department of PP "United Russia".

3. By the way, the subject of influence on political structures in the existing situation can be any subjects. For example, the same non-profit organizations funded from abroad. On the one hand, we are making political life "more transparent", on the other - please nominate your candidates for the primaries and "push" their voting. The official procedure, when any opposition can be put forward for the primaries, to ensure a consolidated vote "for their own", and as a result, United Russia will be forced to either nominate an opposition representative or ignore the opinion of the electorate. Both options are unacceptable.

Question of selection of candidates and requirements for them. Under regulatory regulation, it is very difficult to screen candidates. Political parties often forget that they have political platforms and programs. How will this relate to the “suddenly won” candidate? How much does the candidate share the opinion of the nominating party?

4. Be sure to regulate the issue of participation in the primaries of one or more parties. Separately, the issue of control over these nominations. One candidate (for example, non-partisan) can be nominated by the entire party at once. If the candidate wins the primaries of two or more parties?

5. Procedural and organizational issues. How is the procedure for nominating candidates for the primaries, how can they campaign for the electorate to collect votes, how to regulate public events, with whom to coordinate / notify the election campaign ... A lot of procedural issues. Only a professional lawyer can understand them, and even then not everyone. This is a question of an additional “professional” barrier not provided for in the legislation.

6. A separate item is necessary to regulate the issues of media coverage of the primaries. It is necessary that, on the one hand, campaigning for candidates was not election campaigning of a candidate and a political party, but on the other hand, what would the candidates actually talk about? Is it possible to separate the campaign of candidates participating in the primaries from the campaign directly? Again the question: who will follow this?

7. Well, we decided who and how to vote, but another main question: who counts? For the counting of votes, the main requirement is OBJECTIVITY. It is no secret that the main complaints in the electoral process are the counting of votes. Maximum “transparency” of this process is a guarantee of the legitimacy of the elections. It is necessary to regulate the activities of those who count votes. That is, to oblige the only structure that does it professionally (the election commission) to participate in the counting of votes. Otherwise, the results will somehow look doubtful.

8. And, by the way, it is necessary to determine who will consider disputes between candidates for the primaries. Courts - who else! That is, a separate judicial practice on the application of "optional" and completely unregulated procedures of PRIMERIES.

9. Let us turn to the economy, so to speak, to the base. The media flashed information that the primaries cost PP "United Russia" in 600 million rubles. Believe me, for this note, it does not matter what amount is spent. It is important whose money it is. Suppose a wealthy party has spent its own resources on such an important event. But is it possible, say, for other political parties to make similar “investments” in candidates? The question is rhetorical.

We return to the main point. The primaries, even with a “recommendatory character,” put serious barriers. Parties conducting primaries are forced to use their ADMINISTRATIVE (and not only) RESOURCE.

The introduction of the primaries is a very deep revision of the electoral legislation. For such work, you need at least to explain the need for this. You can not listen to PR people and stupidly implement their proposals.

There is a law. It must be observed!
Author:
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Finches
    Finches 1 June 2016 12: 48
    +8
    This is a clever move by United Russia - it's a no brainer!
    1. zao74
      zao74 1 June 2016 12: 53
      +16
      This is a clever move by United Russia - it's a no brainer!
      New ways to stay in power ... slander, but just start to work weakly?
      1. PHANTOM-AS
        PHANTOM-AS 1 June 2016 14: 30
        +4
        With or without primaries, is there anyone else in the country who wants to vote for the bucket ?! am
        1. Finches
          Finches 1 June 2016 14: 40
          0
          You have an alternative party - by and large Chernomyrdin was right - which party did not create, anyway the CPSU, it turns out! Therefore, I personally do not care who sits in the Duma, since I spent most of my life and spend within the framework of one-man management, then only one thing is enough for me - the presence of the Supreme Commander, and all these Dumas, Federation Councils, etc. organizations, for me the 401st way of honestly taking money from the population!

          Although sometimes there’s some benefit - in the last all-Russian September elections - by the way a sensible move to make an election day in the September 1 region - and so, my budget-paid spouse was given 3 prizes, so that she would vote correctly! and at the beginning of the new school year ... It’s true that before that they didn’t give a similar prize, but for the elections they gave ... laughing

          Now imagine, comrades, how many state employees are in the country - for whom these 3 are urgently needed on the farm ...!

          1. PHANTOM-AS
            PHANTOM-AS 1 June 2016 15: 00
            +5
            Quote: Finches
            do not care who sits in the Duma, because I spent most of my life and spend in the framework of unity of command

            You want to say that the army is a state in the state and does not obey civil laws? And you will not go to retirement and will not become "civil"?
            Quote: Finches
            then one thing is enough for me - the presence of the Supreme Commander,

            I will not be surprised that if the commander in chief gives you the order to vote for the bucket, then you will.
            I remind you that you are primarily a citizen and only a second soldier.
            By the way, the post of president, your commander in chief, the post is also elective.
            1. Finches
              Finches 1 June 2016 15: 33
              -8
              If he orders to vote for the bucket - I will vote for the bucket! I will tell you more, that's exactly what happens!

              By the way, you’re wrong - the Commander-in-Chief is not an elected position! This is the president - an elected one! hi
              1. PHANTOM-AS
                PHANTOM-AS 1 June 2016 15: 46
                +9
                Quote: Finches
                By the way, you’re wrong - the Commander-in-Chief is not an elected position! This is the president - an elected one!

                In accordance with Article 87 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation is the President of the Russian Federation.

                I do not know what to add to this. request
                If he orders to vote for the bucket - I will vote for the bucket! I will tell you more, that's exactly what happens!

                Therefore, together we will have what we have. And the Medvedev, Grefof, and Nayebulin.
                1. Finches
                  Finches 1 June 2016 15: 50
                  0
                  They elect the President of the Russian Federation, but when they elect and he officially takes office, he becomes Supreme: "begins to perform his duties from the moment he takes the oath and terminates their fulfillment upon the expiration of his term of office from the moment the newly elected president takes the oath"!hi

                  Who do you recommend voting for?
                  1. PHANTOM-AS
                    PHANTOM-AS 1 June 2016 16: 04
                    +2
                    Quote: Finches
                    They elect the President of the Russian Federation, but when they elect and he officially takes office, he becomes Supreme:

                    Well, where did you find contradictions in my posts? request
                    Simply, every citizen voting in elections should know that he is voting not only for the president, but also for the commander in chief in his person. yes
                    Quote: Finches
                    Who do you recommend voting for?

                    There are a lot of worthy people in the Russian Federation, only there are not many "promoted" people, but from the famous I would recommend: Zyuganov, Boldyrev, Grudinin, for example. hi
                    1. Finches
                      Finches 1 June 2016 16: 31
                      0
                      Come on, without changing the fundamental system, nothing will change! It will only get worse! And scrapping the system is revolution and turmoil, civil war ... Elections are a show so that the naive layman thinks that he decides something and that from him that it depends! Utopia!
                      1. avia1991
                        avia1991 1 June 2016 21: 33
                        +1
                        Quote: Finches
                        without breaking the fundamental system, nothing will change!

                        Exactly!
                        Quote: Finches
                        And scrapping a system is a revolution and a crackdown, a civil war ..

                        And doing nothing is the "collapse of the Roman Empire", moral and physical decay, decay and oblivion ..
                        Remember when there was a development in history without shocks?
                      2. PHANTOM-AS
                        PHANTOM-AS 2 June 2016 01: 36
                        0
                        Quote: Finches
                        Come on, without changing the fundamental system, nothing will change! It will only get worse! But scrapping the system is a revolution and a crackdown, a civil war ..

                        It’s wonderful that you understand this, only without breaking the system, Russia will die out, like an ancient pangolin, both physically and mentally.
                        If you are going to all this ... to protect, then how warm, you and the globe in your hands.
                        I can only say right away that my family is retreating towards our colleague Wheel, and I remain as a rearguard covering the withdrawal, you can be a fighter, you can with tactics from platoon to company, of course, with the subsequent transition to the offensive, in order to recapture, won by the usurpers lands, bowels and graves of fathers.
                        How do you like this?
                      3. Finches
                        Finches 2 June 2016 05: 42
                        +1
                        Will not get out! Everything will be, as in the motto of the wisest king Solomon, engraved on the ring: "And this will pass!" laughing

                        And to protect, if from an external enemy - then yes, but if you mean internal upheavals, then for this they created the Rosguard ... hi
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. castle
              castle 1 June 2016 16: 55
              0
              Once, a trial took place in Nuremberg. War criminals and political criminals were tried there. Some of the accused said: "I, as an honest officer, only followed orders. I am not guilty of anything. The leader decided for me."
              It is a pity that many people live not thinking, but "following orders." Then, of course, America is to blame for everything. And the fact that the roads are bad and the elevators are falling and the "golden youth" laws are not written and food anti-sanctions, to the detriment of their people, are introduced.
              It is a pity that many people, from young nails, are treated in a spirit of submission: "they will tell you what to do, do not think with your head, follow the order." This is my stone in the garden of the Youth Army and others like that. They will also grow up to vote for the bucket. Then a happy life will come! For those in power! And Rosgvardia will suppress the riots of its hungry pensioners.
              1. Finches
                Finches 1 June 2016 17: 19
                -2
                Do not distort and do not exaggerate! Just to teach to live with your own head - and it prompts, elections, like all "democracy", is a utopia invented for the supposedly "legal" exploitation of some others!
                1. avia1991
                  avia1991 1 June 2016 21: 36
                  0
                  Quote: Finches
                  elections, like all "democracy", is a utopia invented for the supposedly "legitimate" exploitation of some others!

                  In that case, why don’t you just ignore the elections, but go to support those who are hungry continue, "legally"?
                  1. PHANTOM-AS
                    PHANTOM-AS 2 June 2016 01: 49
                    0
                    Quote: Finches
                    How to teach how to live with your own head - and it prompts, elections, like all "democracy", is a utopia invented for the supposedly "legitimate" exploitation of some others!

                    As far as I remember you, you are a frantic fan of Comrade Stalin.
                    In this regard, I ask you to note that Putin is not Stalin, since they are class enemies. yes
                    1. Finches
                      Finches 2 June 2016 05: 38
                      +1
                      I have never been a frenzied admirer of Comrade Stalin - I am for an objective understanding of history, but I respect Comrade Stalin as a state figure appropriate for a country of such proportions as Russia and undoubtedly brought great benefit to it!

                      Likewise, I respect the GDP of his affairs! hi
                    2. avia1991
                      avia1991 2 June 2016 21: 10
                      +1
                      Quote: Finches
                      Comrade Stalin, I respect how a state figure is appropriate for a country of such proportions as Russia and undoubtedly brought great benefit to it!

                      good yes
                      Quote: Finches
                      Likewise, I respect the GDP of his affairs!
                      what ... request
                      In words, I can add one thing: INCOMPATIBLE.
                    3. Finches
                      Finches 2 June 2016 22: 09
                      0
                      So times are not quite comparable!
              2. Finches
                Finches 2 June 2016 05: 36
                0
                I have written here many times and will write again that since 1996 I haven’t been going to the polls and I’m not going to go!
                The question was, if the Supreme orders personally, then yes - I will execute the order!
  • alekc75
    alekc75 1 June 2016 12: 51
    -2
    we need to write in Russian, we live in Russia
    1. Sluggish
      Sluggish 1 June 2016 12: 53
      +9
      Yes indeed. And write "in Russian" with a hyphen. And before "we" would not hurt to put.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
          1. Maksus
            Maksus 1 June 2016 13: 39
            +2
            Fiercely plus, colleague!
      2. 31R-US
        31R-US 1 June 2016 17: 26
        0
        exactly - and put the stress on the letter "a"
  • weksha50
    weksha50 1 June 2016 12: 51
    +9
    Actually, this talk about elections and parties is tired of, and even more so, the need to pass a law on this topic ...

    Instead of solving the urgent problems of both the state and the people, the boyars are racking their brains on how to put slingshots on the way to the rivals on the way, and, on the contrary, make it easier for them to go to this trough ...

    PS And this word (primaries) - filthy, not ours ... Trial, trial, preliminary - wouldn’t it be easier to say?
    1. larand
      larand 2 June 2016 08: 34
      +2
      Quote: weksha50
      PS And this word (primaries) - filthy, not ours ... Trial, trial, preliminary - wouldn’t it be easier to say?

      Not enough of their brains, that’s all this rubbish being licked from the West, and millions taken from us, which would be invested in the country, are squandered on their ambitions. The gentlemen have their own quirks, they are upon us ...
  • LEVIAFAN
    LEVIAFAN 1 June 2016 12: 52
    +9
    let me know, at whose expense is the banquet?
  • dsm100
    dsm100 1 June 2016 13: 01
    +13
    Already got with these expressions: primaries, low-coster, supervisors, merchandisers, speechwriters, etc., what are the Russian words? What are we collecting all this garbage ?!
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. RUSS
      RUSS 1 June 2016 13: 10
      0
      Quote: dsm100
      primaries

      The primaries are "pre-election voting", who calls what ....
    3. Amurets
      Amurets 1 June 2016 13: 18
      +3
      Quote: dsm100
      Already got with these expressions: primaries, low-coster, supervisors, merchandisers, speechwriters, etc., what are the Russian words? What are we collecting all this garbage ?!

      We only have the "Council for the Russian Language under the President" arranges a talking shop. Aifonchik put half of the Russian folk words into mats. And translate these non-Russian words not from English, Latin or Ancient Greek, and all this will turn out to be obscene language.
      1. RUSS
        RUSS 1 June 2016 13: 23
        0
        Quote: Amurets
        .Aifonchik put half of the Russian folk words in mats

        Interesting and what are these words?
  • vanavatny
    vanavatny 1 June 2016 13: 06
    +3
    I'll take the ballot with me - to hell with them, and not my voice hi
  • NDR-791
    NDR-791 1 June 2016 13: 17
    +9
    Primaries - what is it?
    And I have another little question: Primaries - why do we need this ??? If deputies from their parties do not know how many people are ready to vote for them, then you need to tear something from the easy chair and go to the region and communicate with people. And someone will answer another question - how much does this laziness cost? In the USA, primaries are just a show that makes a lot of money, but with us it's a waste of money or shifting from one pocket to another because political shows called the election of most of us have long been involved!
  • avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 1 June 2016 13: 20
    +3
    Honestly, I do not believe in modern parties, bullshit all this. There is a constitution of Russia, this is the Law, and if a person is ready to serve every point - the drum of which party he is, I will probably vote for him, no - sorry, move on.
    1. avia1991
      avia1991 1 June 2016 21: 39
      +1
      Quote: avg-mgn
      if a person is ready to serve every item

      Interesting! what
      Ah .. how are you going to know that he is "ready"? BELIEVE ON A WORD? laughing
  • Damask
    Damask 1 June 2016 13: 23
    +4
    Damn, to find out a person, you need to spend a lot of dough and window dressing with the torment of the population, how to ride edrosov in the elections, although no one but them, the lion will still remain, but the rams need to be changed
  • Barakuda
    Barakuda 1 June 2016 13: 44
    +3
    But in China, criticism of the authorities and the Communist Party is a prison. So think about it People? Which system is better. and more effective.
    request
  • Stas157
    Stas157 1 June 2016 13: 52
    +6
    United Russia adopted the American party selection process, the primary elections in Russian, and the American name left! Apparently they thought that this would add weight to them, although the opposite is true for me! Well, they would have spent their Primaries in the homeland of this name! But, the most disgusting thing is that these internal party elections are held at public expense.
    I did not vote for ED, and I will not.

    Internal party debate should not be held at public expense.

    It is not clear why the "social elevators" of the social structure, which the party is, should work for the budget, that is, for ours, money. Primaries, as well as elections, are enchantingly expensive.

    Edrosses, apparently, believe that in Udmurtia there is little money plundered, they can still be plucked in the primaries.

    Viktor SHUDEGOV Deputy Chairman of the Education Committee of the State Duma of the Russian Federation, Professor http://udmurtia.spravedlivo.ru/005135722.html
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. RUSS
      RUSS 1 June 2016 14: 16
      +2
      Quote: Stas157
      I did not vote for ED, and I will not.
      1. Stas157
        Stas157 1 June 2016 14: 52
        +2
        Right! Well, that’s exactly the kind of facial expression I have when mentioning ED!)))
  • Verdun
    Verdun 1 June 2016 14: 00
    +2
    I am absolutely convinced that only party elections should be held in Russia. That would have voted so much for EDRo, so much for the Communist Party or the Liberal Democratic Party. And the party itself, which received a certain percentage of seats in the Duma, must decide who to put in deputy seats, and whom to recall due to inefficient work. This is the only way to get rid of populism in the elections, when people who are popular, but do not have the necessary skills to run the country, are put forward in the Duma in order to increase the popularity of an individual party. Popularity must be earned by specific work results. Then people will think about which party representatives in the Duma should be more.
  • Next
    Next 1 June 2016 14: 03
    +2
    This nonsense is the primaries, all state employees are driven to vote for incomprehensible nominees whom people simply did not see in their eyes. We make shows from the elections, as in the states. Nothing new.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • kit_bellew
    kit_bellew 1 June 2016 14: 26
    +5
    Primaries-figimeries ...
    I will not be too lazy to write again. Soviet power was called so not at all because "take away and divide", but because Tips workers', peasants' and soldiers' deputies of various levels: from the rural to the Supreme. People didn’t get into these Soviets through campaigning: they were put forward by their own labor collectives. They didn’t put forward promises to raise pensions, but because they knew that this one is a production leader, doesn’t drink, doesn’t hang around women, he has a son in a youth team, a daughter in music, and in general a reliable man of all trades. People about it knew, they did not have to be campaigned. And where are the workers, peasants and soldiers' deputies now? They are not here. There are arrogant faces one another wider beautiful taken is known no one knows where to voters known exclusively to the electorate crime chronicle booklets. It doesn’t matter which one of them gets into an elected post: whether it is a deputy, a mayor, a governor or someone else - the result will be one: zero result. For the people, of course.
    Elections in their current form will not lead to any positive changes in the country. Therefore, they must be sabotaged. As they did in Bryansk last year, when Cthulhu defeated the region’s governor wassat
    1. cap
      cap 1 June 2016 15: 30
      +3
      Quote: kit_bellew
      There are impudent muzzles one wider and more beautiful, taken from no one knows where, electorates known to voters solely from the criminal chronicle of booklets. Whichever of them gets into the elected post, it does not matter which one: whether it is a deputy, a mayor, a governor or anyone else - the result will be the same: zero result. For the people, of course.
      PushkarevPushkarev


      No comment. To the topic.
      https://news.mail.ru/incident/25970871/?frommail=1


      MOSCOW, June 1. / TASS /. Vladivostok Mayor Igor Pushkarev is suspected of abuse of power and commercial bribery. This was reported to TASS by the official representative of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation Vladimir Markin.

      “The Department for the Investigation of Particularly Important Cases of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation instituted criminal proceedings against the head of the city of Vladivostok Igor Pushkarev and other persons on the grounds of crimes under Part 3 of Art. 285 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (“Abuse of official authority, entailing grave consequences”) and under Part 3 of Art. 204 of the Criminal Code (“Commercial bribery”) ”
      42-year-old Igor Pushkarev has been the head of the Vladivostok administration since 2008. Prior to assuming this position, he was a member of the Federation Council (2004–2008).
      1. Greenwood
        Greenwood 1 June 2016 15: 37
        0
        After mowing down, Fluff continued the glorious tradition of the mayors of Vlad - to fall under investigation at the end of his term in the mayor’s chair. Looks like a damned place. wassat
  • 31rus2
    31rus2 1 June 2016 14: 43
    +2
    Dear ones, they’ve rolled off, tomorrow EP will bring out a new word and what? I already wrote that not one leader, not one party reacted to the actions of EP, is it even more interesting to make legislation for the party and do you want something else?
  • pts-m
    pts-m 1 June 2016 14: 44
    +1
    You must go to the polls and vote not with your heart, but with your head.
  • rus-5819
    rus-5819 1 June 2016 15: 39
    0
    Quote: dsm100
    Already got with these expressions: primaries, low-coster, supervisors, merchandisers, speechwriters, etc., what are the Russian words? What are we collecting all this garbage ?!

    drover supervisor, merchandiser-retractor, speechwriter- verbiage
  • 1536
    1536 1 June 2016 17: 12
    0
    The primaries were first adopted by the opposition parties (non-systemic opposition) in order to "prove" that millions of voters across the country were ready to vote for them. Thanks to them, outright crooks, if not enemies, could get into power on the ground.
    The EP primaries seem to be the answer to that. And nothing more. Especially against the background of the failure of the primary elections "organized" by the opposition. The pre-election struggle did not work either then or now. Everyone is on his own. As before, people who are completely incomprehensible to anyone find themselves in the Duma. "Did you vote for him (her)?" - the main question after any elections. "No!" - a typical answer after any elections. "And where did he (a) come from then?" - an answer that remains unanswered after any elections.
    Paradox. We know better the representatives of the US Congress, the Ukrainian deputies just became relatives, and who is sitting in the Duma is like a secret behind seven seals. And why be surprised that even in cemeteries, not everything became calm ...
    Better with primaries alone, but without choices, or with real choices, but without primaries. I think so.
    1. 31rus2
      31rus2 1 June 2016 17: 20
      0
      Dear, a good idea, it means that you urgently need to disperse, and to plant some, so to speak following an analogy. And it will become easier for everyone, the president, the people, and even the treasury
    2. Verdun
      Verdun 1 June 2016 17: 21
      +1
      Quote: 1536
      who sits in the Duma is like a mystery behind seven seals

      Why do you need to know by name who is sitting in a thought? The Duma, in essence, is the same working body as a factory or institute. Is it important to know the names of those who design your car? You just buy a car of the brand that you like. And if the car is rubbish, then the next time you get a car of a different brand. With the same measure, you need to approach the Duma. If a party has a majority, but the results are not satisfactory, then it makes sense to vote so that the other party has a majority. And individuals can always be bought, intimidated or seduced.
  • atamankko
    atamankko 1 June 2016 18: 38
    0
    EdRosov is not embarrassed that they even take names from our enemies,
    it would be better to dig deeper into their environment and remove the unworthy.
    1. Verdun
      Verdun 1 June 2016 19: 16
      +1
      Quote: atamankko
      it would be better to dig deeper into their environment and remove the unworthy.

      Joke, please? This will be a completely different party.
  • The comment was deleted.
  • sw6513
    sw6513 1 June 2016 19: 29
    0
    recently there was the same gangway at school with music, for the whole day 7 people went in and wrote 10000. It is well known that this is a usual juggling, as always .. Besides the president there are no decent
    1. avia1991
      avia1991 1 June 2016 21: 45
      +1
      Quote: sw6513
      In addition to the president, there are no worthy

      belay SHO ?! And Putin was forced to join "EdRo", damn PR people? !! ..
  • loaln
    loaln 3 June 2016 11: 31
    0
    Everything is correctly noted in the article. Yes, and any sane person can see that someone wants not only to jump above their capabilities, but also to jump out of their "pants" under favorable conditions.
    Yes - this is agitation. But any excessive agitation is harmful. True, if she does not cover up illegal manipulations. Secondly, this phenomenon makes it possible to prepare reserve "positions", involving EVERYONE in the discussions. It is not for nothing that FRONTS, movements, etc., etc. are multiplying at an enviable speed. Crowds of new functionaries appear who, judging by the debate, are already "oh, how far from the people."
    Under these conditions, any failure of officialdom is covered by a parallel movement. And for insurance, the practice of choosing single-mandate persons is introduced.
    In general, instead of a clear definition of the responsibility of any popular political force for its "VYKRUUTAS", the practice of BLURNING continues not only to the goals and performers, but also to identify the ideologists responsible for the next period of "development" of the country.