Military Review

A referendum on joining the Russian Federation will be held in 2017 in South Ossetia

64
The authorities of South Ossetia said that a referendum on the issue of joining the republic in the Russian Federation will be held in 2017 g, reports Look with reference to RIA News.


A referendum on joining the Russian Federation will be held in 2017 in South Ossetia


“Guided by the long-term interests of the South Ossetian people and striving to ensure the stability of the socio-political situation in the Republic of South Ossetia, we make a joint statement supporting the decision of the political council under the President of the Republic of South Ossetia on 26 in May 2016 on the advisability of holding a referendum on the issue of the Republic of South Ossetia composition of the Russian Federation in 2017, after the presidential elections in the Republic of South Ossetia ",
says a document signed yesterday by the President of the Republic Leonid Tibilov and Chairman of the Parliament Anatoly Bibilov.

The intention to hold a referendum in the republic Tibilov said 11 April. In turn, Vladimir Putin during the straight line (April 14) noted that Russia cannot oppose the will of the South Ossetian people.

“We didn’t discuss with the head of South Ossetia in detail (about joining the Russian Federation), he told me his attitude to this problem, said that the people of South Ossetia want to hold such a referendum, but we cannot, I think, oppose it. Nothing holds us back except the interests of the South Ossetian people themselves. But we do not yet know what will be the basis of this referendum, how the questions will be formulated in the final form, depending on this, we will think further, ”Putin said.

Against the referendum has already made the US State Department.

“Our position on Georgia: we support the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Georgia, which includes South Ossetia. So we do not recognize any attempt by South Ossetia to separate or declare its sovereignty ",
said on the site of the department.
Photos used:
www.youtube.com
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avvg
    avvg 27 May 2016 10: 00
    +16
    Decisions must always belong to the people, with whom to be and where to be, and we will not oppose the will of the South Ossetian people.
    1. Andrey K
      Andrey K 27 May 2016 10: 06
      +22
      Quote: avvg
      Decisions must always belong to the people, with whom to be and where to be.

      Getting ready for sanctions by Georgia request
      What to do without Borjomi request
      Now mattresses with exercises on training law enforcement and repelling possible aggressions will climb request
      After all, they will train again, again it will be necessary to utilize the NATO rubbish somewhere laughing
    2. Deniska999
      Deniska999 27 May 2016 10: 13
      +7
      A referendum would have been held long ago. Ten years almost pulled.
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 27 May 2016 10: 46
        +6
        Deniska999 (2) RU Today, 10:13 ↑
        A referendum would have been held long ago. Ten years almost pulled.
        hi
        Here, that's just the point! And to the West we are trying to look at everything in our teeth. The impression is that God forbid we will anger someone. With the "Russian spring" that they were so scared !? For a long time Novorossiya would have been a part of Russia. And It wouldn’t be any war !!! Something is always afraid and looking around. And just don’t flood about the great geopolitical chess players! I don’t believe. We are always justified in something. We are afraid of NATO, then we are not afraid. Stop fidgeting. If you are right, then you are right!
        1. Alexey-74
          Alexey-74 27 May 2016 11: 12
          +9
          Exactly ... someone is afraid for their capital, which settled in the West ....
          1. jjj
            jjj 27 May 2016 11: 42
            0
            From 2008 to 2017, nine years. We will be guided by this figure, well, maybe we'll throw another year. It turns out that ten years is the period after gaining independence and the beginning of entry into the Russian Federation?
            1. Talgat
              Talgat 27 May 2016 20: 42
              +2
              Alans ancient people

              Murat Aji wrote that even in the army of Atilla, the main nations - who fought with Europe - were the Huns (the Turkic steppes - the ancestors of the Kyrgyz, Tatars, Bashkirs, Kazakhs, etc.) Slavs and Alans

              Alans with Eurasia for thousands of years - and this can not be changed, even if they are few now

              Remember the recent history - the Great Patriotic War - and the defense of Vladikavkaz. Thousands of years pass - and the people remain - and the descendants do the same. as their ancestors
        2. SG11
          SG11 27 May 2016 11: 46
          +6
          About New Russia - I support. It was necessary as in the Crimea-and to hold a referendum. is there a war in Crimea? here is the result
      2. Alexey-74
        Alexey-74 27 May 2016 11: 11
        +7
        It is interesting if referenda are held in the former republics of the Union, then how many percent of the population will vote for joining the Russian Federation? Even if you throw out Ukraine, the Baltic states and Georgia ..... I think the percentage will be large .... people everywhere are tired of the mess ....
    3. vlad66
      vlad66 27 May 2016 10: 15
      +14
      Quote: avvg
      Against the referendum has already made the US State Department.

      Yes, wipe off the striped-eared hyenas, it is not up to you cat-dogs to decide, but the people of South Ossetia, and we will only be glad that the Ossetians are one people, but divided, finally reunited, if only we could live until the whole divided Russian people reunited.
    4. Wiruz
      Wiruz 27 May 2016 10: 26
      -2
      Decisions must always belong to the people

      Alas and ah. We cannot refuse to accept South Ossetia into the Russian Federation, but by accepting we will only strengthen Georgia's already strong desire to join NATO. We will have a second "Baltic" request
      1. vlad66
        vlad66 27 May 2016 10: 35
        +17
        Quote: Wiruz
        ... We will have a second "Baltic"

        And this "Baltic", called Georgia, still exists and has not disappeared anywhere. yesAnd now they are striving for NATO’s grandmother and who knows, there is some kind of Sukinshvili and decides to repeat 08.08.08, because the same kakelyas clang their teeth to the Crimea, but they’re afraid of losing their teeth, they know that they will rake quickly, efficiently and in full, that's just and blather that we’re the top, the top is, they’re only screwing the 3rd year, but they stink request So with Ossetia, if it is also part of the Russian Federation, any Sukinshvili will first think about his teeth. hi
      2. SG11
        SG11 27 May 2016 11: 49
        +1
        Georgia’s desire for NATO does not depend on this
      3. michell
        michell 27 May 2016 13: 41
        +1
        Quote: Wiruz
        We cannot refrain from accepting South Ossetia as part of the Russian Federation, but by accepting we will only strengthen Georgia’s already strong desire to join NATO.

        One of the conditions for admitting a candidate country to NATO is the absence of territorial disputes in a given country. So Georgia, if it really wants to join NATO, has two options - either recognize the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, or forget about NATO ...
      4. The comment was deleted.
    5. Nasty
      Nasty 27 May 2016 10: 45
      .
      And why should I the will of the South Ossetian people? Why don't they fulfill MY will? Too many require me to execute.
    6. The comment was deleted.
    7. siberalt
      siberalt 27 May 2016 11: 03
      +5
      And where to go if the republic is recognized? Is it really difficult to integrate into a single Russian Ossetia some 200 thousand inhabitants, and even with their own land? It's all about politics. Or will we wait when the sanctions are lifted from us? Yes, if that, then again introduced. And so, seven troubles one answer.
    8. just exp
      just exp 27 May 2016 11: 03
      -4
      and the Russian people will be asked - does he want to be with the Ossetian people, who already have Russian citizenship?
      there are pluses - no NPOs and Maidans will turn Ossetia onto the American path, and this is generally important.
      but there are also disadvantages - it will take a lot of money from the budget to rebuild Ossetia, and the local bureaucrats will both get rich and get rich again at our expense.
      1. Andrey K
        Andrey K 27 May 2016 12: 39
        +9
        Quote: just EXPL
        and the Russian people will be asked - does he want to be with the Ossetian people, who already have Russian citizenship?

        In principle, I almost, somewhere in the darkest, worst corners of my soul agree with you request
        But I hope very few of these dark corners yes
        And why did you suddenly "worry" about the whole people, especially the Russian, in Russia for 130 nationalities, and if you have already undertaken to "wang", you would call it correctly - the Russian people hi
        Р ›РЁС ‡ РЅРѕ СЏ FOR reunion of two Ossetia, North and South good
        And we, Ossetians will not ask, this is one people and they live together good
        Quote: just EXPL

        but there are also disadvantages - it will take a lot of money from the budget to rebuild Ossetia, and the local bureaucrats will both get rich and get rich again at our expense.

        As for the minuses you listed - well, already good about budgets and money, our relatives, Volga, Far Eastern, Stavropol bureaucrats are dragging so much that the Ossetians will not get it request
        And about getting rich at our expense - for mine personally, no one is getting rich request
        And the reason is trivial - I work honestly, I get my salary on white, not in an envelope, I pay taxes, I don’t take bribes and don’t give ... How to cut my hair, but no way laughing
        A bureaucrat, if you wish and will, you can always put in a rack yes
        I am for reunification with South Ossetia. Mentally we are close, they are the same Orthodox, the memory of the "common home" - the USSR, they have not faded good
        1. just exp
          just exp 27 May 2016 18: 46
          +1
          I remember that these same republics begin to sing when Russia runs out of money. I do not wish you to hear this in person.
          I've heard it. and i remember.
  2. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 27 May 2016 10: 01
    +8
    The logical conclusion is: they will be part of the Russian Federation, 0.8.0.8.0.8. will not repeat.
  3. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 27 May 2016 10: 01
    +10
    Why not join the Ossetians? South Ossetians, I wish you to become just Ossetians next year!hi
  4. megafair
    megafair 27 May 2016 10: 01
    +10
    And Abkhazia, which lags behind, if only to enter, so immediately two.

    We collect pieces of the Empire a little bit, and that’s good ...

    South with North at least reunite.
    1. Sergej1972
      Sergej1972 27 May 2016 10: 06
      +8
      And Abkhazia, unlike South Ossetia, does not want to be part of the Russian Federation, wants to be in union with it or in associated relations. And some Abkhaz figures (not themselves, however, influential) also make territorial claims against the Russian Federation.
      1. megafair
        megafair 27 May 2016 10: 30
        +2
        Here I see the situation like this, after South Ossetia entered the Russian Federation, Georgia, they could only incite Abkhazia to incite hatred, in this case the story of 1810 will be repeated when Abkhazia will be faced with the choice of either being destroyed or asking for protection and becoming part of Russia.
    2. Alexey-74
      Alexey-74 27 May 2016 11: 15
      +2
      Abkhazia would also be nice to hurry
  5. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 27 May 2016 10: 04
    +5
    Welcome to a family called the Russian Federation, and do not care about all Westerners who do not agree with this.
  6. Amurets
    Amurets 27 May 2016 10: 05
    +7
    We also support the territorial integrity of the United States, but we are not against the reconstruction of the Confederate States of America. (CAB) http://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/ruwiki/30666
  7. Who said
    Who said 27 May 2016 10: 12
    +10
    And we do not support the territorial integrity of the United States and are ready at any time to recognize the independence of the state of Texas
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 27 May 2016 10: 22
      +3
      Quote: Who said
      And we do not support the territorial integrity of the United States and are ready at any time to recognize the independence of the state of Texas


      They will bomb, however ... or the ATO will announce and impose sanctions against Russia ... repeat
    2. weksha50
      weksha50 27 May 2016 11: 28
      +2
      Quote: Who said
      ready to recognize Texas state independence at any time


      And there, in the United States, without any civil war, the point is that by 2050, Latinos, and in particular Mexicans, will constitute a significant proportion of the US population ...

      Already, the population of Latinos is much larger than the number of African Americans ... 37% of the US population !!! This is not a canine tail ...

      The task of all Mexicans who illegally arrived in the USA is to give birth to their children, who immediately acquire US citizenship ... And specifically, Mexicans succeed in this ...

      So analysts are still speculating, but the Senate Congress is not twitching so far ... Apparently, they have not fully realized what awaits them in some 20-30 years ...
  8. Victor-M
    Victor-M 27 May 2016 10: 14
    +4
    Against the referendum has already made the US State Department.

    “Our position on Georgia: we support the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Georgia, which includes South Ossetia. So that we do not recognize any attempt made by South Ossetia to secede or declare our sovereignty»

    But what about democracy and the right to self-determination, and in other words, American verbiage is not an obstacle for the South Ossetian people, as well as the people of Texas and Alaska. If the United States is against the collapse of the states and cares for their integrity, then Russia goes to the meeting of the United States, or rather their desire to preserve the integrity of the states, and restores its territory. laughing
  9. Denis DV
    Denis DV 27 May 2016 10: 15
    +4
    Against the referendum has already made the US State Department.

    in the XNUMXst century the opinion of the US State Department residents of the Russian Federation and South Ossetia is not interested laughing
  10. Erg
    Erg 27 May 2016 10: 20
    +4
    With all due respect to the Ossetians, realizing that for them it is a matter of survival ... For Russia, it is another "headache". No one has canceled international agreements. Not so simple. Although, in my opinion, attach. soldier
    1. vanavatny
      vanavatny 27 May 2016 10: 32
      +2
      perhaps that’s why they postponed, even if they don’t give a damn, even if we get to the Urals, we’ll still be presented, for example, someone’s tortured Euro geyser and they will impose new sanctions, so that slowly, lightly, so that you can’t finish the economy, you won’t eat more hari, by the way This year in the Crimea, which I also wish you all. and if we don’t stupid and have patience, then we’ll still go up the Potemkin stairs hithanks for the Ossetian pies good
  11. Stirbjorn
    Stirbjorn 27 May 2016 10: 21
    0
    Ossetians, yes, these are not Russians from New Russia who are being pushed back to Ukraine, for reasons of humanity, of course.
    1. vorobey
      vorobey 27 May 2016 10: 24
      +6
      Quote: Stirbjorn
      Ossetians, yes, these are not Russians from New Russia who are being pushed back to Ukraine, for reasons of humanity, of course.


      So far no one has shoved anyone ... and the fact that you read an opinion somewhere, think about what requirements are set and how feasible they are ... You did not think that New Russia is not needed separately without Kiev and Southern Ukraine ... we’ve been breaking spears for two years ... IMHO
      1. Stirbjorn
        Stirbjorn 27 May 2016 13: 11
        0
        "If he meant that he intends to return Donbass, guided by considerations of humanity, then such a statement can be supported. And, in fact, this is what we hope for in Moscow."
        This is Peskov stated. Local favorite Zakharova also proposed arming the OSCE observers with small arms. About some requirements in return, I did not hear anything. And let lovers of hpp think out, so all of God's dew
        1. vorobey
          vorobey 27 May 2016 20: 01
          +2
          Quote: Stirbjorn
          About some requirements in return, I did not hear anything


          Moscow is not a party to the conflict, the interested party .. The demands were voiced by Zakharchenko ... and again, Novorossia itself is not interesting ..

          http://politobzor.net/show-94036-lavrov-podvel-chertu-sankcii-ne-stoyat-donbassa
          .html
  12. Taygerus
    Taygerus 27 May 2016 10: 24
    +6
    Against the referendum has already made the US State Department.
    “Our position on Georgia: we support the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Georgia, which includes South Ossetia. So we do not recognize any attempt made by South Ossetia to secede or declare our sovereignty ”

    The State Department from Fashington may be better concerned with the referendum in Texas, and so it will be slippery without snotty, and only the residents of South Ossetia themselves will decide about joining Russia and not if not they, it’s better to invent new lists and sanctions, I personally do not mind laughing
  13. Irbis77
    Irbis77 27 May 2016 10: 28
    +2
    but in Alaska there was no referendum at all, they bought it, but they did not ask the opinion of the people. return Alaska, then maybe in a million years we will discuss other issues.
  14. Alekseir162
    Alekseir162 27 May 2016 10: 30
    +6
    Against the referendum has already made the US State Department.

    And when the State Department was in favor, well, unless Yeltsin and Gorbachev destroyed the USSR. Then both praised and praised, and as soon as Russia, first timidly, and then more and more loudly began to declare their interests, then everyone yelled about the revival of the empire. Russia should be violet, that there screaming overseas and in Europe. We have our own interests, and the dogs bark, the wind wears.
    1. sannych
      sannych 27 May 2016 10: 41
      +7
      Well, Baba Yaga is always against it. Interestingly, of course, the most democratic country in the world (well, at least the Americans themselves think so, and even not all of us, and our frostbitten liberals) oppose the will of the people. But what about the voice of the people - the voice of God? When something happens against the interests of an exclusive country, there can be no democracy, there are geopolitical interests. As in the situation with Kosovo, which, according to the United States and its waving vassals, is supposedly radically different from the Crimea. Although here we can agree that the situations are completely different, it was a reunion of the people in the Crimea, whose opinion the maize did not even think to ask, and in Kosovo - the forcible rejection of the historical part of Serbia. But the people of Kosovo have the right to self-determination, but the inhabitants of Crimea and Ossetia do not. And why did they ask the United States, but because ... and a slurred mooing in response.
  15. Sergej1972
    Sergej1972 27 May 2016 10: 31
    +7
    South Ossetia has every right to decide its fate. The only thing is that, in fairness, Georgian villages on the territory of South Ossetia should also be able to self-determine. Either to remain part of the South Ossetia, and in the future, along with it, to become part of the Russian Federation, or to remain in Georgia, possibly in the form of a microscopic Georgian enclave within the South Ossetia and, accordingly, the Russian Federation.
    In general, it must be remembered that the borders of not only the majority of the Union, but also practically all autonomous republics were artificial. Supporting the Abkhaz’s desire for independence from Georgia, for example, I don’t really understand why the residents of the Gali district are predominantly Georgian nationals (the majority of the population are Georgian Svans, this is the original population of the region, and they have always been in the majority, unlike other regions of the Abkhaz The Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, where a large number of Georgians were brought in in the 30-50s in order to reduce the percentage of the Abkhaz population) should not have the right to determine their fate by choosing either Georgia or Abkhazia. Now that the Georgian authorities are pursuing an anti-Russian policy, the presence of the Gali district as part of Abkhazia is justified for us. But over time, relations with Georgia, I hope, will improve. And the problem of the Gali district will have to be solved. On the other hand, how to solve it without quarreling with proud Abkhazians? That is the question ...
    In the same way, I am for recognizing the independence of Nagorno-Karabakh, with the prospect of joining Armenia. But without those territories of the former NKAR, where at the time of the outbreak of the conflict, the Azerbaijani population dominated. The borders of Azerbaijan, as well as Armenia, and most of the other union republics, were artificial. But the borders of autonomies, one of which was the NKAR, were also set quite arbitrarily.
    In general, I think that in international law it would be necessary to establish the rule that in the case of the realization of the right of nations to self-determination (which should be used in the form of separation only in the most exceptional, hopeless cases), the borders of new independent states should not be established along administrative-territorial lines, but exclusively within the territories where branch supporters prevail.
    1. Erg
      Erg 29 May 2016 21: 35
      0
      I put a plus. Although, there is a more reasonable solution. In the family ALWAYS the eldest is right. The decision is made by Him alone. So it will be good for everyone yes Personal experience suggests.
  16. Sergej1972
    Sergej1972 27 May 2016 10: 34
    +3
    No one will tell you how to change the settings? The font has become very small, it is very difficult to read the messages of members of the forum. And I did not make any changes to the settings. When I go to other sites, everything is fine there.
  17. Nasty
    Nasty 27 May 2016 10: 41
    -3
    And the people will be asked? If asked, I will say no.
    1. The black
      The black 27 May 2016 11: 57
      +1
      And the people will be asked? If asked, I will say no
      You have the right. wink Only here is interesting - why?
      1. sannych
        sannych 27 May 2016 12: 23
        0
        Maybe because of the nickname?
  18. ☆ Alexander ☆
    ☆ Alexander ☆ 27 May 2016 10: 42
    +2
    Give the USSR! wink
    1. megafair
      megafair 27 May 2016 10: 46
      +2
      Give the Russian Empire within the borders of 1866;)
      1. vorobey
        vorobey 27 May 2016 20: 43
        +2
        Quote: ☆ Alexander ☆
        Give the USSR! wink

        Quote: megafair
        Give the Russian Empire within the borders of 1866;)


        Well then, both the Alaskan Federal District and Washington are a city of federal significance ... repeat
        1. megafair
          megafair 28 May 2016 15: 20
          0
          Well, in 1866 the territory of the Russian Empire was the maximum;)
  19. Holsten
    Holsten 27 May 2016 10: 49
    +4
    "The US State Department has already opposed the referendum."
    If we take seriously the State Department’s statements, Russia should urgently dissolve itself and demand that the occupation administration be sent.
  20. Deniosf
    Deniosf 27 May 2016 11: 09
    +4
    and Americans, as always, every barrel barrel plug! They want to join us and are already joining in the form of Crimea and Sevastopol, and who are these goners? no one! on the contrary, Texas is going to hold a referendum and free itself from American slavery.
  21. Diesel 72
    Diesel 72 27 May 2016 11: 32
    +1
    Friendship of Peoples is a reliable stronghold!
  22. Corvetkapitan
    Corvetkapitan 27 May 2016 12: 30
    +6
    The budget of South Ossetia is filled from the budget of Russia, it is guarded by the Russian army. Ossetia should be united, as part of Russia.
  23. Air defense SSH
    Air defense SSH 27 May 2016 14: 40
    +1
    That's right - there is no South and North Ossetia, but a single Russian Ossetia. Behind them is the Obkhazia, and there is the gaze and the territory of Usrains with Transnistria ...
  24. KARBON-05
    KARBON-05 27 May 2016 16: 22
    0
    Georgia is becoming impudent
  25. RUSIVAN
    RUSIVAN 27 May 2016 21: 11
    0
    Against the referendum has already made the US State Department.

    “Our position on Georgia: we support the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Georgia, which includes South Ossetia. So we do not recognize any attempt made by South Ossetia to secede or declare our sovereignty ”
    South Ossetia should still be asked by the State Department where and with whom to be ...
    This can happen when the United States asks South Ossetia for permission in which sovereign country it will invade the next time ...
  26. 1536
    1536 27 May 2016 23: 01
    0
    De facto South Ossetia is already part of Russia. In addition, the unity of the Ossetian people, now divided along the Georgian border, must be restored. We are still under sanctions, still no one will remove them, and they will only be tightened. But at least there will be no unnecessary springboard for villains from the USA and the EU in this so-called Georgia, from which it is easy to start shelling our territory and attacking inland. It is necessary to hold a referendum, it is necessary to recognize its results, and on the basis of this, officially accept South Ossetia as part of Russia!
  27. Thompson
    Thompson 28 May 2016 11: 37
    0
    Quote: just EXPL
    I remember that these same republics begin to sing when Russia runs out of money. I do not wish you to hear this in person.
    I've heard it. and i remember.

    A conclusion suggests itself, and another, why is Russia running out of money? Following your logic because of the Crimea, South Ossetia, etc. There are things and concepts more important than loot and wealth.