The main task set in the Ost Master Plan, the destruction of the Soviet Union, was fully accomplished by Yeltsin’s homegrown team.
What the Nazi leadership intended to do with our state and our people after their victory was outlined in the Ost Master Plan, developed in the departments of Himmler and Rosenberg - in the General Directorate of Imperial Security and in the so-called East Ministry of Nazi Germany.
This is one of the most savage and shameful documents of the twentieth century, before which all other political programs of conquest and genocide of the peoples of that time are dying. But the Ost Master Plan was not destined to become widely known in Germany and other NATO countries.
The ways and methods of destroying the Russian statehood and undermining the power of the Russian nation are directly connected with the Ost Master Plan, which is what the US ruling circles are striving for. In addition, this plan causes other associations: no less cruel fate was prepared by him and other Slavic and other peoples of Europe, who now fell into the orbit of another contender for world domination - the United States.
One of the chapters of my four-volume book, Hitler's Strategy: A Way to Catastrophe, is devoted to reviewing the goals and contents of this ominous plan. While working on this chapter, I could not get rid of the terrible impression that what happened to our country after the destruction of the Soviet Union in December 1991, surprisingly resembles the plans outlined in the Ost Master Plan. Only these plans were carried out with their own "domestic" hands. And behind all this was the “invisible hand” stretching towards Russia of another, the latter-day contender for world domination - the ruling elite of the United States.
After the fall of the Soviet Union, she decided that the time had come for her to become the ruler of the world. The process of the collapse of the Soviet Union was transferred by it to Russia, which became the object of an undeclared war. Unlike Germany, this war was waged by new methods - without the use of force and the occupation of territory.
The “strategy of indirect actions” was launched, that is, undermining the country from the inside. Such a strategy of crushing Russia, carried out by the Yeltsin regime with the help of “shock therapy”, voucher privatization and other methods imposed from outside, turned out to be much more effective than the Hitlerite “blitzkrieg” using the Wehrmacht - the world's strongest army at that time. And outwardly everything looked decently.
Bush did not hesitate to make it seem that America is almost Russia's best friend. Under Yeltsin, he was even declared "a reliable and predictable partner." In fact, he said one thing, and did another - the double standard in the worst form! When we dealt with Hitler, Goebbels, Rosenberg, Himmler and other rulers of the Third Reich, it was clear to us who the enemy is and how to fight it. They did not hide their plans. Now everything is done gradually, the most sophisticated methods are used to confuse the people and mislead them regarding the threats that exist for them.
So, we present some of the provisions of the Ost Master Plan and compare them with what happened to our country after the December 1991 coup d'état and the collapse of the Soviet Union. We get amazing coincidences.
"For us Germans, it is important to weaken the Russian people to such an extent that they are no longer able to prevent us from establishing German domination in Europe."
And the last 17 policy of the United States can be successfully applied with the motto: “Weaken the Russian people to such an extent that they can no longer prevent us from establishing American supremacy in the world.” The American ruling "backstage", neglecting the lessons of the past, breaking all the norms of international law, rushes uncontrollably to world domination. The foundations of this US policy were laid in the “Project for the New American Centure”.
The Nazi clique of Germany, too, set as its goal the conquest of world domination. This goal was set in the draft Hitler Directive No. 32 of 11 June 1941. “Preparations for the period after the implementation of the“ Barbarossa ”plan.
In Himmler’s dreams, it looked like this: “By the end of this war, when Russia will eventually become exhausted and be eliminated, and England and America will not endure war, the task of creating a world empire will arise for us ... In this war we will achieve everything that in previous years, from 1938, it was annexed to the German, to the Great German and then to the Great German Empire, remained in our possession. The war is being waged in order to pave the road to the East, so that Germany becomes a world empire, so that the German world empire is founded. This is the meaning of war, no matter how long it lasts — five, or maybe six or seven years. ” After the implementation of the plan "Barbarossa" was planned to postpone the strategic efforts of Germany to defeat the United States and Britain.
The main task set in the Ost Master Plan - the destruction of the Soviet Union - was fully implemented by Yeltsin’s homegrown team. It was Yeltsin who carried out the destruction of the Soviet Union. After that, for almost a decade, he collapsed Russian statehood and the economy and brought terrible disasters on the people. AT history He entered as the greatest Herostrat of the twentieth century.
The desire of the ruling circles of the United States to build a unipolar world under the American aegis again threatens humanity with tragic consequences. Multipolarity is the normal state of the international community, and not a single power, since ancient times, has been able to turn it into unipolarity, that is, into its hegemony. Such is the law of international relations.
The creators of the Ost Master Plan also proceeded from the fact that, by destroying Russia and undermining the “biological power” of the Russian people, they would be able to clear the path to domination over Europe and the world. But they are big miscalculations. All this, Yeltsin and his advisers, apparently, did not think at all. And intelligence and education did not allow them to do this.
For them it was important one thing - to seize the power and resources of the country. They were completely alien to the understanding that they would enter history as shameful personalities.
"The whole territory of Russia needs to be divided into a number of states with their own governments, ready to conclude peace treaties with us ... The creation of these governments will require very great political skills and well-thought-out general principles."
Nowadays, many American politicians who develop the US foreign policy or have a strong influence on it adhere to these goals. Zbigniew Brzezinski, for example, expressed the opinion that “the United States should be the only ruling power in Eurasia. Who owns Eurasia also owns Africa. ” And for this, he wrote, it is necessary, among other things, to eliminate Russia as a Eurasian power, and in its place create a confederation consisting of the European Russian republic, the Siberian and Far Eastern republics. ("Foreign Affiliates", June, 1997). This installation is embodied in the real US policy.
"It is necessary to envisage the division of the territory inhabited by Russians into different political areas with their own governing bodies in order to ensure in each of them a separate national development ... so that under no circumstances should they be oriented towards Moscow ... There is no doubt what an administrative the fragmentation of Russian territory and the systematic isolation of individual areas will prove to be one of the means of combating the strengthening of the Russian people ... The carriers of the state political idea should be destroyed. ”
It was in this direction that the Yeltsin criminal clan acted. By proclaiming Russia's sovereignty, he provoked the collapse of the Soviet Union at the peak of its socio-political and economic reform. Then followed the slogan: "Take as much sovereignty as you can swallow."
The local bureaucratic nomenclature of Russia was not slow to take advantage of this in order to consolidate its power, its political and financial position. The country was on the verge of collapse. The Yeltsin disintegration policy found approval and full support from the United States. Of course, it contributed to the growth of separatism in certain regions and national republics, led to the “Dudaev phenomenon” and the outbreak of war in Chechnya.
“Our political line with respect to Ukraine is to encourage aspirations for national independence, up to the potential of creating our own statehood either in Ukraine as such or in association with the Don Oblast and the Caucasus. This union would constitute the Black Sea Union, which would have to constantly threaten Moscow and cover the Great German living space from the east. In economic terms, this area at the same time would constitute a powerful raw material base of the Great German Empire. To the territory which in the USSR is regarded as purely Ukrainian, one would have to cut the outlying areas from the composition of the indigenous Russian space ... This would weaken Great Russia and at the same time create a political counterweight to it. It would be possible to transfer part of the territory of the present Kursk and Voronezh regions to Ukraine. ”
It’s like two drops of water, similar to the already almost realized American plans to create a “sanitary cordon” against Russia. It was for these purposes that at the NATO Washington Summit in 1999, it was decided to create a GUUAM group consisting of Georgia, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan and Moldova. Unlike the Nazi plans, this group was expanded at the expense of the states of Central Asia. In addition, on the part of Washington, great efforts are being made to counter Poland against Poland and the Baltic countries. The latter did not appear in the Ost Master Plan as part of the anti-Russian “sanitary cordon”, since they were planned to be abolished altogether and included in the Third Reich.
If Hitler tried to create a sanitary cordon against "Muscovy" by military occupation of Ukraine and other Eastern European countries, the United States focused on organizing the "orange revolutions" in them as the most effective way of overthrowing their leadership and bringing their people to power. So, in Ukraine, the role of the American satrap began to fulfill the regime of Yushchenko, who seized control of the country with the help of a street crowd.
"Our policy with respect to the peoples inhabiting the vast expanses of Russia should be to encourage any form of disagreement and division." (From the statements of Hitler at the meeting in the supreme rate)
Nowadays the principle of “divide and rule” lies at the heart of the methods of anti-Russian, as, indeed, the entire European policy of the United States. The old slogan of the times of the Cold War “to keep Russians” outside Europe (“to keep Russians out”) and in every possible way to help maintain the division of the European continent fully retains its significance.
But now its geographical scope has been significantly pushed to the East. The first stage of this nomination is related to the inclusion of Eastern European countries in NATO. At the second stage, after the “orange revolutions”, the dividing line between Russia and Europe was moved to the eastern border of the anti-Russian “sanitary cordon” from the Baltic to the Black Sea, that is, along the lines of the Baltic countries and Ukraine.
That's just with the Americans, the Americans did not work. In no way is it possible to implant the American fifth column in it and accomplish the next “orange revolution” in order to further expand the sphere of American influence on the former Soviet territory.
After the “threat from the East” fell away, it was important for Washington to create with the help of Georgia, Ukraine and the Baltic countries a new “image of the enemy” represented by Russia, “to encourage any form of disagreement and division,” as Hitler said. Otherwise, the "cordon" could not fulfill its mission. In the countries of the “sanitary cordon,” at the suggestion of the US ruling elite, an anti-Russian propaganda campaign is underway. The crimes of Stalin are being scoured, although they had long been condemned in the Soviet Union, Russophobia is being blown up in every way, Russia is again being presented as an “evil empire”, etc.
And in Ukraine, collaborators who collaborated in the army of Bandera with the Wehrmacht and fought against the Soviet troops rehabilitated and proclaimed "national heroes". Servilism to please the pro-American elites of Washington in these countries truly knows no boundaries.