Military Review

Watchtower of the Black Sea Fleet "Curious" went to the Mediterranean Sea

41
Patrol ship of the Black Sea fleet In "RџS <S,R" RoRІS <R№V "PI F ± F" RoR¶R ° R№S € RμRμ RІSЂRμRјSЏ RІRѕR№RґS'S, PI PI SЃRѕSЃS,R ° RЎSЂRμRґRoR · RμRјRЅRѕRјRѕSЂSЃRєRѕR№ RіSЂSѓRїRїS <SЂRѕSЃSЃRoR№SЃRєRoS ... РІРѕРµРЅРЅС ‹С ... РєРѕСЂР ° Р ± Р» ей Рё РІСЃРїРѕРјРѕРіР ° тельны С ... СЃСѓРґРѕРІ. РџРµСЂРµС ... РѕРґ In "РџС‹ тливого» РёР · Р§С'СЂРЅРѕРіРѕ РјРѕСЂСЏ РІ СредиР· емное РѕСЃСѓС ‰Р‰РІРІРІРІР ° РћР ± этом СЃРѕРѕР ± С ‰ Р ° РµС ‚ press office Black Sea Fleet of Russia.


Watchtower of the Black Sea Fleet "Curious" went to the Mediterranean Sea


The watchdog commanded by Captain 2 of the rank of Dmitry Dobrynin left Sevastopol and headed to the straits for passage into the Mediterranean Sea.

At the moment, on a rotational basis in the Mediterranean Sea there are more than a dozen Russian military (surface) ships and auxiliary ships not only of the Black Sea, but also of other fleets of the Russian Federation - the Baltic and Northern.

For your information:
The patrol ship "Inquisitive" was built on the project 1135M. In the fleet with 1981 year. The crew of the ship - 197 people, including 20-25 officers.

The ship’s displacement is 3,4 thousand tons, the cruising speed is up to 32,2 knots, the cruising range is about 5 thousand nautical miles at a speed of about 14 knots.

Armament:
4 launchers of the URK-5 “Rastrub” missile system, two dual launchers of the “Osa” air defense missile system, two AK-100 gun mounts, two 533-mm torpedo tubes, and two Smerch-6000 bombs.
Photos used:
Central Naval Portal
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. aszzz888
    aszzz888 25 May 2016 13: 32
    +4
    Replacing comrades is a holy thing!
    1. NEXUS
      NEXUS 25 May 2016 13: 56
      +9
      Quote: aszzz888
      Replacing comrades is a holy thing!

      The reconstruction of the 5th squadron of the times of the Union is a necessary thing. Our squadron would not have left those waters, there would have been neither Iraq, nor Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria ...
      1. kepmor
        kepmor 25 May 2016 14: 48
        +4
        Good day!
        A classmate in "python" after the battle, over a cup of tea, in 86, told how the LC "Iowa" or "Missouri" ironed Beirut with their main caliber in front of the "amazed public" - our 5th OPESK.
        And ours did not even rock the boat to end this mess, but only watched and sent
        CCP reports to Moscow!
        The army and navy are just levers of foreign policy ... it all depends on the desire and the presence of political will!
        In other words, you need to have "steel faberge", and they do not always help - Saddam, Milosevic and Gaddafi are a vivid example of this.
        So the "beating of babies" by the Americans and their sixes would hardly have prevented our squadron from being in the middle ground!
        1. NEXUS
          NEXUS 25 May 2016 14: 58
          +1
          Good day!
          Quote: kepmor
          So the "beating of babies" by the Americans and their sixes would hardly have prevented our squadron from being in the middle ground!

          I think it would have prevented. It all started with the departure of the 5th squadron. So they freed up a place, but a holy place ... you know.
          Moreover, the presence of a military fist in the region is never superfluous. I would have received an order at the time of which you are speaking, the Commander-in-Chief from Moscow, would have been pushed mattresses from those waters in the back of the boat. But politics played there, which is obvious.
          But even now, if the 5 squadron were at the time the war in Syria began, many problems could be avoided and resolved as they say, without leaving the cash desk. Yes, and the SU-24th, our one would not even dare touch .
          1. kepmor
            kepmor 25 May 2016 15: 08
            0
            Sorry, a typo on my part is Benghazi, not Beirut.
          2. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 25 May 2016 22: 36
            +3
            Quote: NEXUS
            Moreover, the presence of a military fist in the region is never superfluous.
            True thought ...
            But the reality, it is somewhat different.
            I don't know if it's true or not, but evil tongues said that the former Commander-in-Chief received a heart attack after Shoigu's question: "Where are the new ships? Why is there only old stuff in Mediterranean?"
            "Inquisitive" was good for its time. Maybe, after a deep modernization, it would meet the requirements of the time for air defense / missile defense, strike weapons, search equipment for submarines, it would acquire an aircraft ...
            And so, "We have what we have ... Now we need to try not to fuck us." - A common saying of our youth.
            Conclusion: To be feared and respected, as was the case under the Union, we need more weighty arguments that meet the requirements of the 21st century.
            IMHO.
            1. NEXUS
              NEXUS 26 May 2016 00: 39
              +1
              Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
              Conclusion: To be feared and respected, as was the case under the Union, we need more weighty arguments that meet the requirements of the 21st century.
              IMHO.

              Solidarity with you. And in light of this, the laying of another corvette looks a little more interesting, and the early adoption of patrol boats of the Burevestnik series (admiral's series) into service, as well as frigates of project 22350 with the lead ship Admiral Gorshkov, and of course the submarine of the project Varshavyanka, MRK of the Buyan-M project "Vyshny Volochek".
              By the way, the ships of Project 22350 should be built in a truly large series for all four fleets. After all, the patrol ships of Project 11356 "Burevestnik", so to speak, are a transitional project (or deep modernization of the Soviet project "Burevestnik"), to 22350.
              And this should be done as quickly as possible in order to increase the Black Sea Fleet with new ships, both surface and submarines, capable of performing tasks under new realities and threats.
              Sincerely. hi
  2. Wiruz
    Wiruz 25 May 2016 13: 35
    +3
    Well, with the modernization of the BOD pr.1155, everything is clear (or rather nifiga is not clear), but are we going to update our old Black Sea underfregs? At least I would put Calm-1, Uranus with X-35, upgrade artillery request
    So sorrow sad
    1. DarkMatter
      DarkMatter 25 May 2016 13: 49
      +3
      Well, like Uranus (X-35) is going to be put on Shaposhnikov.
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz 25 May 2016 13: 54
        +1
        Well, like Uranus (X-35) is going to be put on Shaposhnikov.

        Well, it seems like Chirkov, the storyteller of Tuda, promised to deliver Caliber and Onyx, and A-192, and Redoubt (if he meant it by "missiles from S-400").
        And so, what happens? Will Uranus Replace the Sockets? Will the large anti-submarine ship be left without any anti-submarine missiles?
        No, if 1-2 UKSK modules were stuck there, I would not say a bad word request
    2. avt
      avt 25 May 2016 13: 50
      +4
      Quote: Wiruz
      But are our old Black Sea underfregs going to update? At least I would put Calm-1, Uranus with X-35, upgrade artillery

      So that they drowned under the weight of weapons ??? wassat Completeness - they served sufficiently and regularly for the smaller “Sharp-witted”, whom I wish to become a museum, and it's time to send them a change.
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz 25 May 2016 14: 00
        -1
        Of course, I know that it is not advisable to put 8 guns on an 10-gun ship, as they say. Yes, but I don’t think that he will drown. Quite the contrary, if you dismantle obsolete weapons and put something more modern instead, the ship will even lose a little weight.

        Who needs these wretched bells in the nose? And put in their place a new gun mount, like the same A-190; and instead of stern implements, shove at least one UKSK module (and Shtil-1, if possible) - that would be "in color" good

        Eh ... Something I dreamed about winked
        1. DarkMatter
          DarkMatter 25 May 2016 14: 16
          +1
          I want it too laughing
          only they won’t give us money repeat so Uranus is better than nothing, probably
          1. kepmor
            kepmor 25 May 2016 14: 55
            +1
            It's not even about the money, be it not okay.
            Such a large-scale modernization of the ship is not economically viable - it’s cheaper and more efficient to build a new one from keel to klotik!
        2. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 25 May 2016 15: 47
          +2
          Quote: Wiruz
          Who needs these wretched bells in the nose? And put in their place a new gun mount, like the same A-190; and instead of stern implements, shove at least one UKSK module (and Shtil-1, if possible) - that would be "in color"

          Yeah .. we put the ship on modernization, about 2-3 years with it ... we work - and according to the conclusion from repair after 2-3 years, write off by age.

          Look at the years of commissioning. In the 30th division of NK, except for "Moscow", all ships are the last representatives of their projects. Their sisters have long gone on pins and needles, not only at the infamous Pacific Fleet, but even at the Baltic Fleet with the Northern Fleet.
          At the Black Sea Fleet there is even a live 61M!
          1. Wiruz
            Wiruz 25 May 2016 15: 56
            0
            So I'm not saying that new ships are not needed. On the contrary. It's just that there’s not so much use for a ship with such weapons. Modernization is needed. Moreover, since new ships arrive (in August they plan to transfer Makarov as well), the Black Sea Fleet will not remain without patrol officers
          2. Boa kaa
            Boa kaa 25 May 2016 22: 45
            +2
            Quote: Alexey RA
            At the Black Sea Fleet there is even a live 61M!
            I am by birth a Severomorets (what I am proud of). But he was always amazed how the Black Sea men keep their ships! good Truly the Royal Navy! That's why the ships they go in long-livers, and do not die in the prime of life as in the Pacific Fleet. yes
            1. kepmor
              kepmor 26 May 2016 18: 32
              0
              Well, you, and compared .... north to south!
              If in the north "the sun rained down 300 days a year", then there are no questions - a sparp with a boatswain "boobies of heaven"!
              I will only reveal one secret - for the northern ships in the 70s, the standards of skipper supply were cut to the Black Sea standards - instead of the oil PF-167 (for painting ships), they issued XC-427 (absolute chemistry), which, at the first exit to the sea in winter, climbed with beads, like "Shagreen leather"!
              PF-167 was in warehouses, but you could get it only for an additional fee - "awl"!
              Therefore, each painting of the ship is a "heart attack for the first mate".
              So, your comparison is absolutely incorrect!
              By the level of operational-combat tension - combat duty - the SF ships far exceeded the Black Sea ships! This is a recognized fact!
      2. Mikado
        Mikado 25 May 2016 14: 29
        0
        Quote: avt
        “Sharp-witted”, which I wish to become a museum, and it's time to send them a change.

        And it was on this "museum" that the X-35 was found where to attach it. A good exposure is obtained good Still serve!
        1. Alexey RA
          Alexey RA 25 May 2016 15: 53
          0
          Quote: Mikado
          And it was on this "museum" that the X-35 was found where to attach it. A good exposure is obtained

          So it was 20 years ago. Then the "smart" was not yet so worn out, and there were no other options then. So they stuck 8 "harpoon" launchers instead of RBU.
          1. DarkMatter
            DarkMatter 25 May 2016 15: 59
            0
            Well, with the modernization of the BOD pr.1155 everything is clear (or rather nifiga is not clear)

            Sorry, but talk about 1155 yes at least I'm talking about them wassat
            About the Black Sea Fleet and there’s nothing even to discuss, to write off everything after receiving a replacement.
            There is nothing to upgrade there, 1135, Shrewd, when this modernization is over they will really need to be written off right away, well, they look like a couple of years, and for the price it will probably be like a new ship.
  3. Laksamana besar
    Laksamana besar 25 May 2016 13: 43
    +1
    Seven feet, bon voyage!
  4. avt
    avt 25 May 2016 13: 47
    +1
    Seven feet and full speed, but where is "Grigorovich"? It seems that he went to the Black Sea! Yes, and "Essen" seems to have come from the north and it's time to go to the home port with a call to Tartus.
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 25 May 2016 13: 49
      0
      In Malta he wink Rum drinks, port girls feels bully
    2. weksha50
      weksha50 25 May 2016 14: 00
      0
      Quote: avt
      Seven feet and full speed, but where is "Grigorovich"? It seems that he went to the Black Sea! Yes, and "Essen" seems to have come from the north and it's time to go to the home port with a call to Tartus.



      Well, Inquisitive provides not only rotation, but also the presence of a flag ...

      But new ships still may not be worth driving THERE ...
      In connection with attempts to create a NATO flotilla in the Black Sea - that’s how it belongs to the Black Sea Fleet ...
    3. K-36
      K-36 25 May 2016 14: 03
      +3
      The transfer of Essen to the Fleet has been postponed for the time being. Due to the need for one more checkout to the sea. recourse
      Details here http://www.i-mash.ru/news/nov_predpr/79705-psz-jantar-peredacha-skr-jessen-otkla
      dyvaetsja.html
      Best regards hi
      1. Wiruz
        Wiruz 25 May 2016 14: 08
        +1
        The transfer of Essen to the Fleet has been postponed for the time being. Due to the need for one more checkout to the sea

        Just do not need to raise a panic here now. Raising the flag was postponed for several days. It must, then, they once again go to sea - not all howitzers still fired hi
        1. LÄRZ
          LÄRZ 25 May 2016 14: 34
          +2
          Quote: Wiruz
          Just do not need to raise a panic here now. Raising the flag was postponed for several days. It must, then, they once again go to sea

          Everything is correct, I agree. The launch on the Vostochny had to be postponed, and the President stayed there (so that everyone could "cheat". That's right.) And to time something to coincide with the "red date of the calendar" is a lousy thing, it "smells" of many troubles.
  5. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 25 May 2016 13: 49
    +1
    And in his holds, what "gifts" will he deliver?
    1. Wiruz
      Wiruz 25 May 2016 14: 06
      0
      I strongly doubt that he will arrange "fireworks". Most likely, 91PT2 and 3M54 were loaded into it. The situation, you see, is tense. Not to "salutes". More precisely, I am afraid there will be fireworks, but not against ISIS, but against Turkish ships and submarines. Black Sea RTOs, too, went to the Syrian shores. Just think so? PKRy carried, love yes
      1. LÄRZ
        LÄRZ 25 May 2016 14: 27
        0
        Quote: Wiruz
        I strongly doubt that he will arrange "fireworks".

        Well, not he, so someone, somewhere else / others. Indeed, do not drive him empty! And so - with "goodies" will arrive.
        1. Wiruz
          Wiruz 25 May 2016 14: 55
          0
          Well, not he, so someone, somewhere else / others. Indeed, do not drive him empty! And so - with "goodies" will arrive.

          There will be a lot of honor for bearded men. Look, cruise missiles bomb them. They will have enough free-falling bombs if you know where to drop bully

          I will answer your counter-answer in advance: yes, they were fired at with cruise missiles, and more than once, and not only with Caliber. But it was not so much an attack on terrorists as a signal to European and American partners. And the patriotometer has gone off scale since then - the military enlistment offices are full. "Fireworks" was - that's good, but more is not needed yet. Expensive is a pleasure hi
          1. LÄRZ
            LÄRZ 25 May 2016 17: 58
            0
            Quote: Wiruz
            I’ll answer your counter-answer in advance: yes, cruise missiles were fired at them, more than once, and not only by Caliber.

            Quote: Wiruz
            There will be a lot of honor for bearded men. Look, cruise missiles bomb them. They will have enough free-falling bombs if you know where to drop
            I agree with you. But about my counter-answer, they didn’t guess.
            Quote: LÄRZ
            Well, not him, so someone, somewhere else / others.
            Since our Armed Forces are taking part in hostilities there, we probably need a "consumable". Plus to this - "running" in real combat conditions of new types of weapons. Maybe even not very new ones, but they have not gone through the "baptism of fire". This is what I meant by the word "goodies". And "calibers" on the bearded - from the cannon to the sparrows. Wrong place and wrong time to "victory at any cost"Our leadership there proceeds from the principle of" reasonable sufficiency ", and this is correct. But *** I will -" Inquisitive "will deliver some" goodies "!
    2. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 25 May 2016 22: 57
      +2
      Quote: LÄRZ
      And in his holds, what "presents" will he deliver? Indeed, it is not possible to drive him empty! And so - with "goodies" will arrive.

      Quote: Wiruz
      most likely, 91РТ2 and 3М54 were downloaded.

      Guys! Have any of you been inside at 1135?
      What holds? What are the gifts? What are you talking about?
      The ship went to the BS. Equipped with a wartime staff with full reserves and with ... in one PC pipe.
      And the "Syrian Express" is "along the arc track and other cars."
  6. siemens7774
    siemens7774 25 May 2016 14: 27
    +1
    http://forums.airbase.ru/viewforum.php?id=25 за корабли и пополнение,можно покапаться тута
  7. Enoch
    Enoch 25 May 2016 14: 28
    +2
    32,2 knits knit, which is not bad at all. Well, the blue sea and the sky. God help you!
  8. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 25 May 2016 16: 03
    0
    "Grigorovich" is already in Malta. Perhaps they will serve together. And "Grigorovich" may also "bahn" on the adversary.
    1. Corvetkapitan
      Corvetkapitan 25 May 2016 17: 10
      +2
      Grigorovich is good because it is really multipurpose, and the Pytlivy is a typical anti-submarine ship. The USSR could afford to build special-purpose ships, and in Russia it takes a long time to build ships and not many of them are built, and therefore multipurpose must be built. such as ,, Grigorovich ''.
  9. egor1712
    egor1712 25 May 2016 16: 14
    +1
    The military patrol ship of the Russian Navy Admiral Grigorovich arrived in La Valletta.
    During the voyage of the head frigate to the place of permanent basing on the Black Sea, he made a call to the capital of Malta and will stay there for several days.
    Together with the patrol ship, the sea tug “Victor Konetsky” entered the port of La Valletta.
    1. KnightRider
      KnightRider 25 May 2016 16: 56
      +2
      Quote: egor1712
      The military patrol ship of the Russian Navy Admiral Grigorovich arrived in La Valletta.
      During the voyage of the head frigate to the place of permanent basing on the Black Sea, he made a call to the capital of Malta and will stay there for several days.
      Together with the patrol ship, the sea tug “Victor Konetsky” entered the port of La Valletta.

      Here he is handsome! soldier
  10. Darina
    Darina 1 June 2016 10: 01
    0
    and where is "Inquisitive", you do not know? what