Military Review

A couple of thoughts about Zakharova’s comments on the NATO Secretary General’s speech

136
What is good weekend? Yes, rest, of course, is necessary. Yes, and cottage, river, theater, cinema needed. But for me, the weekend is also good because it allows you to more carefully read the blogs of our politicians. Read social networks. "To cut the corners" perception of some events.




On May 20, Maria Zakharova's post appeared in the network in response to a speech by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. I have long been closely watching what Zakharov says and writes. I must say, for our Ministry of Foreign Affairs this is another successful appointment. A diplomat of such a level and with such charisma is a worthy “continuation” of Lavrov, Churkin and some others, whose words are carefully studied by the politicians of the whole world. May this continuation be so far not always maintained in the style of classic diplomacy.

What we often criticized for our foreign office, a certain "inertia" and "retro-approach" in the negotiations, ended on Zakharova. Now, no one is surprised at the masterful "trolling" of Zakharova’s statements by Western politicians. No one is surprised at her position of an “advancing”, rather than a “defending” diplomat. In short, a worthy opponent to Dmitry Rogozin.

Let's go back to the record. It is really interesting and worth it.

NATO Secretary General for quite a long time trying to find an explanation for the actions of the alliance in the east. After all, even the most patriotic Europeans are beginning to wonder whether it is worth increasing their own defense spending. The impoverished Eastern European countries, in which NATO is the most active today, cannot pay for the presence of troops on their territory.

But the bloc is more and more persistently leading the equipment and units there. I read from a German officer statements about tanks in the Baltics. For what? There tanks, especially such as German or American vehicles, will simply "drown in local swamps." And the local "army" is more like "the guys from the hunting club who decided to play war." I largely agree with this assessment.

Stoltenberg talks about the defensive nature of NATO expansion. We are defending! From whom, please? From Russia? Not? From international terrorism? Well yes. From the same series as the tracking station in Northern Europe. To watch out for penguins at the South Pole of the Earth. These penguins are no less insidious than polar bears. And bears ... That's right, bears are Russia!

That seems to be a solitaire developed, but, as they say, there are nuances.

At the same time, the Secretary General is simply “bursting” with the desire for a political dialogue with Russia. Asleep and sees Jens, as Russia and the alliance "sit side by side and say a word". How together "make efforts to combat international terrorism."

Sorry, but where is this "political dialogue"? He has not been for two years. And before that he was interrupted. Systematically. Apparently, this is the work of the hands or feet of these nuances of restless.

About the "smart combination" let's talk separately. NATO’s military presence on the eastern borders, according to Stoltenberg, is defensive in nature. Thus, the Alliance declares its defense against a potential adversary as its priority. "

Better not tell. Short and succinctly. Talking and doing are different things. The time when Russia "listened and believed" has passed. Now we listen and look after things. And do not wait for clarification from NATO diplomats. We just do it ourselves. For any sneeze not zdravstvueshsya. But the "medical mask" will help. Our actions on the western borders are this very “medical mask”. As doctors say, the best treatment is prevention of the disease. And in our case it would be even better to have a modern-style gas mask. So safer.

And here at all masterly.

“What ?! I just don’t believe my eyes. It’s not Russia that blocked cooperation with NATO! And vice versa. It’s not Russia that declared NATO and its individual members a threat. On the contrary. It’s not Russia that dissuaded countries around the world from interacting with NATO states . And vice versa. "

So the "night dreams" of the NATO Secretary General turned into zilch. It turns out that Russian diplomats remember the past. What a bad luck !!! Two years have passed. And they remember who did something and when. And so sarcastically they write about it. No, to pretend you forgot. Selective amnesia. In diplomacy, by the way, a fairly common disease. So be sure to "make big eyes."

No one doubts the need to resume contacts at the Russia-NATO Council level. Many have written and spoken about this. Including us. However, cooperation should be equal. "Sitting on the side chair" Russia no longer intends to. There is no time for us to sit. A lot of work.

“Russia never, even in the most difficult moments of relations with NATO, did not refuse dialogue, did not slam the door, did not burn bridges. For the last two years we have regularly talked about the destructiveness of not cooperating. Not to be friends with us. And for to work together, counteract threats and overcome differences. All our appeals were ignored by the alliance. "

"If you want to work, the door is open. On an equal and constructive basis, we are always ready to engage in dialogue and engage in concrete actions. Propaganda through loudspeakers will not work, because there is no time to be distracted by idle talk."

Why did Maria Zakharova, albeit in a somewhat satirical manner, respond so harshly to Stoltenberg? After all, in fact, if you read the text of the record, the feeling of "position" appears. And the official representative of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, by virtue of his position, cannot voice personal conclusions. Only that "necessary for work". Costs of the profession? Quite possible.

It seems to me that the Foreign Ministry perfectly understands the "passions" in NATO. You read the statements of various politicians from the member countries of the alliance and you understand: there is no single solution in NATO. Someone in the forest, some for firewood. One minister talks about the need for renewed cooperation. The other is about hard confrontation. The third is about some kind of dialogue on "some issues of European security."

Talking about a full-fledged dialogue in such a situation is not necessary. Today, not Europe controls the unit. Even those countries that have a vital interest in cooperation against terrorism, who have experienced what terror is like, cannot push through decisions on cooperation. But these are not “great” Balts or “invincible” Moldovans and Bulgarians. These are the countries that make up the backbone of NATO. Germany, France, Belgium ...

So "each donkey will continue to wear its ears." We can not relax. And Europeans will have to wait for the appearance of the “new owner” of the White House. A gentleman will arrive - a gentleman will judge. Or build on the ranking and teach all the same to go in line and up.

What is worse, it's not for us to judge. We are not Europe.
Author:
136 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. techie
    techie 24 May 2016 06: 14
    +71
    Zakharova - smart girl! Behind the word does not go into his pocket, and the tongue is like a razor. As for comparison, you remember Psaku, it’s already getting ridiculous - it’s just heaven and earth. 100: 0 in our favor!
    1. Finches
      Finches 24 May 2016 07: 32
      +20
      Indeed, a sensible personnel move to dilute the wolfhounds of our diplomatic corps with an intelligent and pretty woman!
      The State Department lost instantly with its "unsurpassed" fool Psaki laughing

      True, Zakharov is the same victim of post-Soviet education with his comments about the Stalin era, but these are the nuances!
      1. Ami du peuple
        Ami du peuple 24 May 2016 08: 29
        +12
        Quote: Finches
        The State Department lost instantly with its "unsurpassed" fool Psaki
        Set aside to drive to Zhenya! smile In the place of Psaki, the same Zakharova would have looked like a complete fool - it is mentally difficult and physically impossible to justify the lying policies of the US State Department.
        Quote: Finches
        True Zakharov, the same victim of post-Soviet education
        Tek-s, a young woman born in 1975, so she studied herself in a Soviet school. Or. you think. did MGIMO ruin it?
        Quote: Finches
        with their comments about the Stalin era, but these are the nuances!
        These are not nuances. it is a life outlook.
        1. Finches
          Finches 24 May 2016 12: 20
          0
          MGIMO - Russian spill! smile
      2. Vladimir65
        Vladimir65 26 May 2016 16: 41
        0
        This is its inner content. Watch the film "Ambassador of the Soviet Union"
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. siberalt
      siberalt 24 May 2016 08: 15
      +11
      It would be interesting to know the opinion of Matthew Lee on "Kalinka" Zakharova. laughing He is also friends with humor.
    4. st25310
      st25310 24 May 2016 09: 46
      +19

      OUR Masha is good! All the Geyropeisko-Tans ueb * and are not suitable for her soles!
      1. Powder
        Powder 25 May 2016 18: 02
        0
        I would like to quote Leo Tolstoy "War and Peace". Russian dance by Natasha Rostov on the hunting lodge ...
        Viva our women, they do everything beautifully ....
        Regards
    5. Pasha
      Pasha 24 May 2016 13: 07
      0
      PSACA smokes aside
    6. Vadya
      Vadya 24 May 2016 19: 13
      +3
      Without complexes ... wow, how she danced !!! wink
    7. Krieg_XIII
      Krieg_XIII 25 May 2016 11: 57
      +3
      Found someone to compare ...)
      However, Maria’s position on Stalin is a little annoying.
      1. valentber
        valentber 26 May 2016 18: 08
        0
        Can you clarify what exactly bothers you? Attitude to Stalin is a fundamental thing. An objective analysis of his activity during the day with fire can not be found. Although all parties of the political arena actively use his name in their selfish interests.
  2. Terner38
    Terner38 24 May 2016 06: 15
    +3
    This is the Louboutin! - Nice to see! (I'm talking about the photo).
  3. igorka357
    igorka357 24 May 2016 06: 26
    +4
    Maria, Maria is so beautiful and knows how to speak! I think Sergey Viktorovich already has a worthy replacement! Now we need to choose a replacement for Vitaly Ivanovich! At the moment, these three are the personification of real Russian diplomacy!
    1. Tatar 174
      Tatar 174 24 May 2016 06: 39
      +21
      Soon you are writing off Lavrov and Churkin, they are good fighters and hold positions and will not give up. But Zakharov’s shift is really worthy. Well done!
      1. inkass_98
        inkass_98 24 May 2016 06: 59
        +3
        Quote: Tatar 174
        Soon you write off Lavrov with Churkin

        Nobody writes them off, just a person should be in his place (sorry, this does not concern our government, with the exception of Lavrov, Shoigu, and even a couple of people), here Zakharova is in her place, which is good.
    2. bogdan4ik
      bogdan4ik 24 May 2016 07: 16
      -9
      The same defirambs sang to Rogozin. And this official failed to build the East, tore off a missile launch, but spent a sharp tongue and time on all kinds of nonsense like shooting at a shooting gallery and writing on Twitter spent more than on fulfilling his direct duties. But Putin ended up advising him to tighten his tie — it was almost a chop for Rogozin. Everyone sang that the change to Putin was growing, but turned out to be an idler and a wrecker, a saboteur and an enemy. And Rogozin had resources to do everything as necessary. But didn’t. Zakharova is similar to Rogozin one to one. Not much I trust her, there were precedents.
      1. Riv
        Riv 24 May 2016 08: 43
        +7
        Resources are scarce. We also need the right to a demonstration execution before the formation. Not Rogozin delayed the salaries of workers, but a contractor. Change contractor - months of delay with deadlines. Which is worse?
        After all, the prosecutor’s office was really busy with it. But this is not enough. In the 30s, special triples had the right to give up to 10 years in prison. And they gave that characteristic. Without any courts or lawyers. Failed business - get it. So the incentive was to work clearly.
        Incidentally, one of such triples consisted of a certain Kirov ...
        1. user3970
          user3970 25 May 2016 18: 17
          0
          by the way, with regards to judicial (extrajudicial) triplets ... This is not an "invention" of Stalin, but Stolypin's favorite of the GDP.
      2. kit-kat
        kit-kat 24 May 2016 09: 23
        +9
        Zakharova is beautiful, but she is a talking head. Nothing more. At least for now. Annoying general insanity. Meanwhile, she is an anti-adviser. And as practice shows, any anti-adviser is a Russophobe.
        1. Homo
          Homo 24 May 2016 11: 28
          +1
          Quote: kit-kat
          Zakharova is beautiful, but she is a talking head. Nothing more.

          And who in diplomacy is not a talking head. All diplomats voice someone’s thoughts, decisions.
          Quote: kit-kat
          Meanwhile, she is an anti-adviser.

          Anti Stalinist and anti-Soviet are not the same thing.
          Quote: kit-kat
          And as practice shows, any anti-adviser is a Russophobe.

          And what kind of "practice" tell me, with examples it is desirable.
          1. Homo
            Homo 24 May 2016 13: 12
            0
            And again, silently minus. But because there is nothing to answer! tongue
            1. Genry
              Genry 26 May 2016 09: 43
              +1
              Less to you for indecent behavior! laughing
          2. valentber
            valentber 26 May 2016 18: 13
            0
            Some people "voice" their thoughts or are silent, which is much more worthy of dancing a la brothel.
        2. 97110
          97110 24 May 2016 12: 47
          +9
          Quote: kit-kat
          Meanwhile, she is an anti-adviser.

          And our Government is the essence of the government of the bourgeois state, that is, ANTI-SOVIET. And not between that, but above all. Because the economic basis is the extrusion of the surplus product from labor by non-economic methods of coercion. How did you like the idea of ​​the economic bloc to increase GDP by freezing the income of a part of the population living by the sale of labor? Not by differentiating income tax rates, imposing a luxury tax, or increasing dividend tax. No - a real reduction in salaries and pensions. These pensioners are generally an eyesore - they try to use the SURVIVAL period for idleness without bringing an extra product. Every real investor starts to twitch, as he sees these senior citizens. And investing, of course, stops. And GDP is not growing! On the island of Aesculapius us (senior citizens, ess-no)! Then there will be a surplus in the PF and there will be happiness in the economic bloc!
        3. Olegovi4
          Olegovi4 24 May 2016 21: 50
          +2
          Quote: kit-kat
          she is a talking head

          Do you think that any diplomat should say everything that he personally thinks? they are actually paid their salaries for the fact that they "give out" the decisions of the country's leadership.
          1. kit-kat
            kit-kat 25 May 2016 10: 21
            +2
            In fact of the matter. Therefore, I think that enthusiastic hysteria ("well done, genius, as we used to live without it") against this official is not justified.
            1. Genry
              Genry 26 May 2016 09: 31
              -1
              The level of your maximalism indicates the level of your wisdom (inverse proportion).
            2. valentber
              valentber 26 May 2016 18: 15
              -1
              I support And moreover, such dances reduce the level of perception of the country to a brothel!
        4. Genry
          Genry 26 May 2016 09: 26
          0
          Quote: kit-kat
          any anti-adviser - Russophobe

          Anti-Soviet, anti-communist, anti ...
          It’s you who didn’t hear enough of the goblin duplicator (a self-wrinkled politotologist).
        5. valentber
          valentber 26 May 2016 18: 12
          -1
          I support. This lady is just a populist, nothing more. It’s indecent for a diplomat to twist his skirt in front of the audience. This is not a circus!
      3. The Little Humpbacked Horse
        The Little Humpbacked Horse 24 May 2016 10: 50
        +10
        Quote: bogdan4ik
        And Rogozin had resources to do everything as necessary. But did not


        Well, with the employment of his son as deputy director of the property relations department of the Russian Ministry of Defense, he still managed
      4. Homo
        Homo 24 May 2016 11: 25
        +1
        I think that the continuation on your lips will look like this (in the near future): which praises are singing to Putin, but he spoiled the Georgian attack, donated, the crisis didn’t see beforehand, he didn’t get into the brains of every minister (did not scan) before the appointment, oil price allowed to collapse, etc. wink
        1. goblin xnumx
          goblin xnumx 24 May 2016 23: 27
          +1
          mind you are your thoughts out loud :) - aren't you afraid? :)
          1. Genry
            Genry 26 May 2016 09: 39
            0
            Quote: Leshy74
            mind you are your thoughts out loud :) - aren't you afraid? :)

            Are you from the SBU?
          2. The comment was deleted.
  4. samarin1969
    samarin1969 24 May 2016 06: 41
    +2
    Enemy bases are being set up in the former zones of Russia's influence, under the spell of "Minsk-2" they shoot our people in the Donbass, relations with situational allies deteriorate in Syria, none of our "ally" has helped Russia in any way (I do not observe Belarusian or Armenian special forces in Syria ), not ................ but otherwise a "beautiful marquise" ...

    P.S. The enthusiasm for "Kalinka" testifies to the loss of traditions from the times of Gorchakov and Gromyko and the political infantilism of the population.
    1. Homo
      Homo 24 May 2016 11: 30
      +3
      Quote: samarin1969
      Enemy bases are being set up in the former zones of Russia's influence, under the spell of "Minsk-2" they shoot our people in the Donbass, relations with situational allies deteriorate in Syria, none of our "ally" has helped Russia in any way (I do not observe Belarusian or Armenian special forces in Syria ), not ................ but otherwise a "beautiful marquise" ...

      And is Zakharov to blame for all this? If not, then why such statements?
    2. Winter cherry
      Winter cherry 25 May 2016 22: 18
      +2
      I agree. This Kalinka-Malinka is simply cranberry and is not needed for our diplomacy. Stupid and cheap. We are trying to catch up and overtake America in a dope. I don’t like this Masha. Rustic over.
      1. valentber
        valentber 26 May 2016 18: 18
        0
        It is just very very difficult. But cynical. Like all diplomats. Haha
      2. Ros64
        Ros64 29 May 2016 12: 15
        0
        Learn materiel - Russian! In RUSSIAN LANGUAGE it is written "too much", by the way.
  5. Tatar 174
    Tatar 174 24 May 2016 06: 46
    +10
    Of those foreign ministers that in my memory, I put on a row only three: Gromyko, Primakov and Lavrov - the giants of diplomacy. Shevardnadze with Kozyrev went to minus, and the rest were not remembered. May God in the person of Maria Zakharova see a new wave of diplomats worthy of Russia.
  6. Volga Cossack
    Volga Cossack 24 May 2016 07: 16
    +3
    We are not Europe! we remember. Correctly summed up the article! Thank!
  7. meriem1
    meriem1 24 May 2016 07: 33
    +2
    I read it with pleasure. Through a slight sarcasm and this causes a grateful smile to the authors.
    And Mary .. She is beautiful in all her manifestations.
  8. Snow323
    Snow323 24 May 2016 07: 35
    +4
    I am glad that not everyone at MGIMO Ksenia Soyuchak ...
    1. Homo
      Homo 24 May 2016 11: 34
      +1
      Quote: Snow323
      I am glad that not everyone at MGIMO Ksenia Soyuchak ...

      Another stupid comment. Firstly, from which side did Ksyusha appear here? Secondly - in all universities there are a lot of boobies. Thirdly, whoever followed the course at MGIMO (any university) received it.
      1. Homo
        Homo 24 May 2016 13: 12
        -1
        And again, silently minus. But because there is nothing to answer! tongue
        1. Genry
          Genry 26 May 2016 09: 48
          0
          Quote: Homo
          And again, silently minus. But because there is nothing to answer!

          You write it immediately in komenty, do not relax.
  9. realist
    realist 24 May 2016 07: 59
    +2
    Zakharova well done, pretty damn good, despite some bitchiness I like her, and speaks out well. I also approve of the appointment and all her statements, and Kalinka, too, I want to look at the psaki in this situation.
  10. runway
    runway 24 May 2016 08: 06
    -6
    To kick up like that, I need at least a liter. Only the song looked like the Russian "Kalinka".
    In order to like this dance of Zakharova, I need at least three. But I can’t drink so much. hi
    1. Homo
      Homo 24 May 2016 11: 34
      +1
      Quote: piston
      But I can’t drink so much.

      Are you the site wrong?
  11. Kulneff2009
    Kulneff2009 24 May 2016 08: 24
    +22
    A little off topic, but explains a lot!
    1. Homo
      Homo 24 May 2016 11: 39
      +5
      Quote: Kulneff2009
      A little off topic, but explains a lot!

      And a little more off topic, but (in the sense) applies to a lot:
      - an ugly plane will not fly (Tupolev),
      - an ugly weapon does not shoot (Stechkin).
      1. Homo
        Homo 24 May 2016 13: 12
        -2
        And again, silently minus. But because there is nothing to answer! tongue
        1. Teonanacatl
          Teonanacatl 26 May 2016 22: 51
          0
          Quote: Homo
          And again, silently minus. But because there is nothing to answer!

          there are so-called "clickers"
          flushed - click there (to the heap)
          turned green - and there, of course.
          to read and think no time, you see, hi
    2. Ship
      Ship 25 May 2016 09: 16
      0
      Or maybe these shitty nyashki for them are
  12. Kulneff2009
    Kulneff2009 24 May 2016 08: 28
    +22
    And do not add it! Wise woman!
    1. kamikaze
      kamikaze 24 May 2016 22: 03
      +2
      WISDOG BEAUTIFUL MARIA ZAKHAROVA
  13. Kulneff2009
    Kulneff2009 24 May 2016 08: 32
    +24
    Well, I could not resist. I'll throw another photo.
  14. X Y Z
    X Y Z 24 May 2016 08: 36
    +4
    What we have often criticized our foreign policy department for, a certain "inertia" and "retroactive approach" in the negotiations, ended with Zakharova.


    It may have ended on Zakharova, but on the whole, our foreign ministry has not changed at all. This is a very closed and conservative community. Along with bright stars, such as Zakharova, there are full of officials of pre-retirement and retirement age. They work abroad as whole families and are not going to change their lifestyle, quite comfortable and well-paid. Hence the conservatism, the lack of initiative, the desire to keep the status achieved by any means.
    1. Homo
      Homo 24 May 2016 11: 41
      0
      Quote: XYZ
      This is a very closed and conservative community.

      And give an example of the opposite. repeat
      1. Homo
        Homo 24 May 2016 13: 11
        -5
        And again, silently minus. But because there is nothing to answer! tongue
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. brasist
    brasist 24 May 2016 08: 51
    0
    What do not say, but pride for Russian diplomats splashes over the edge, what kind of nerves do you need to have to communicate with the "zombies" and Zakharova and the beauty and the mind God did not offend, but how she puts in any position (Westerners and their puppeteers) that besides stuttering opponents can’t answer anything ...
    1. Ros64
      Ros64 29 May 2016 12: 22
      0
      Maybe it's time to change the terminology - when they write "in the West", for some reason it creeps into my head - "in the WEST"!
  17. wandlitz
    wandlitz 24 May 2016 09: 15
    0
    Quote: brasist
    What do not say but pride in Russian diplomats splashes over the edge, what kind of nerves do you need to have to communicate with the "zombie

    Not only are zombies, but horror is like terrible fools ...
  18. Stoler
    Stoler 24 May 2016 09: 24
    +2
    And how else to react to outright lies ?! Correct TROLLING !!!!!!!!!!!!!! good
  19. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 24 May 2016 09: 36
    +2
    Urgently connect to Zakharova Zadornova - and NATO will die !!!
    1. Homo
      Homo 24 May 2016 11: 43
      0
      Quote: avg-mgn
      Urgently connect to Zakharova Zadornova - and NATO will die !!!

      Don’t touch Grandpa, he’s not the same Zadornov whom everyone remembers.
      1. Genry
        Genry 26 May 2016 09: 51
        0
        Wow!
        This Homo wit considers himself a grandson of Zadorny!
        Documents in the studio ...
  20. Polar Bear
    Polar Bear 24 May 2016 09: 42
    +1
    4 to 45 and a few haters in the comments ... It seemed to me that there would be much more minuses, as happened with the previous article about Zakharova.
    But this is so, a lyrical digression.

    On the subject:
    Well done Maria. I can’t stop wondering how much energy and sarcasm fit in such a pretty woman.
  21. Engineer
    Engineer 24 May 2016 09: 46
    -3
    We are waiting from Peskov Cossack squat)
  22. iouris
    iouris 24 May 2016 10: 35
    0
    Stoltenberg’s opponent is not the Russian Federation, but the Warsaw Treaty Organization. You can just send it ... for a beer.
  23. Torins
    Torins 24 May 2016 11: 04
    -3
    I hope she will take the post of Minister of Foreign Affairs next. good
    1. valentber
      valentber 26 May 2016 18: 23
      0
      God forbid! So it will continue to dance. Only under whose tune?
  24. Hemdall
    Hemdall 24 May 2016 11: 27
    +8
    Quote: Torins
    I hope she will take the post of Minister of Foreign Affairs next.

    but I hope not.

    from: http://nstarikov.ru/club/63400:

    The other day, the main blonde of the Russian Foreign Ministry, Maria Zakharova, revealed herself from a completely unexpected direction. This lady, pleasant in all respects, publicly announced millions of allegedly shot by Stalin, and transparently hinted that Stalin was "actually" worse than Hitler.


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vWjuLldDuQY
    http://aftershock.news/?q=node/377521
    http://nstarikov.ru/club/63400
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ZCLIZsfvSs
    1. Genry
      Genry 26 May 2016 09: 58
      0
      These are the consequences of MGIMO.
      In many educational institutions, apologists of the correct history, advanced by the State Department, are wound up.
      In Ukraine, absolutely all education is from junior high school and beyond.
    2. valentber
      valentber 26 May 2016 18: 28
      0
      Comparing Hitler and Stalin is simply illiterate and unprofessional for a diplomat. Not so well educated. You can see your personal political ambitions.
  25. aszzz888
    aszzz888 24 May 2016 11: 39
    0
    Masha is burning! Well done and professional! Yes, and dance, try dancing on such nails! good
  26. L. A. A.
    L. A. A. 24 May 2016 12: 23
    -6
    What is she dancing? Is it really fun? All the evil go, and she has fun.
    1. aszzz888
      aszzz888 24 May 2016 12: 39
      +2
      L. A. A. RU Today, 12:23 PM New
      What is she dancing? Is it really fun? All the evil go, and she has fun.

      Dancing Kalinka. Fun, but not "hard". And "everyone", may I ask, who is this? Or are you responsible for "everyone"? Do you take on a lot?
      1. L. A. A.
        L. A. A. 24 May 2016 14: 53
        -2
        You probably have fun with Medvedev and our entire government. Well have fun.
  27. Rock616
    Rock616 24 May 2016 13: 22
    0
    Well done Masha. love
  28. Hort
    Hort 24 May 2016 14: 13
    +1
    Zakharova also began to replay no-no.
    So you can not notice and slip into psakism
    1. Avega
      Avega 24 May 2016 17: 54
      +1
      This, in principle, cannot be! Different levels))) Even nearby Psaki is not lying around !!!)))
      1. valentber
        valentber 26 May 2016 18: 29
        0
        By the way, Psaki is far from a fool. She just had a different role.
  29. Torins
    Torins 24 May 2016 14: 24
    0
    Quote: hort
    Zakharova also began to replay no-no.
    So you can not notice and slip into psakism

    I think she will be taught in time how and what to do)
  30. masiya
    masiya 24 May 2016 15: 19
    0
    So the more or less normal diplomatic accompaniment of Russian foreign policy began, keep it up !!!
  31. Avega
    Avega 24 May 2016 17: 52
    +2
    I am proud that our Power has such beautiful diplomats !!! And he will enter a burning political hut! and a whole herd of horses will stop! And then she will dance a simple dance with self-esteem to all these horses))) fulfilling the promise !!! Well done Maria !!! Keep it up The Foes !!! )))
  32. Old warrior
    Old warrior 24 May 2016 19: 32
    0
    Well done, Masha! Our joy. good
  33. Real stalinist
    Real stalinist 25 May 2016 05: 27
    +1
    Zakharova is a level 80 trolling master! :)
  34. dvg1959
    dvg1959 25 May 2016 08: 10
    +5
    Illustrative analogy:
    Zakharova - psaki;
    Russia - USA;
    true False;
    good evil;
    adequacy - Ukraine.
    Incompatible opposite.
    1. Genry
      Genry 26 May 2016 10: 03
      0
      As they taught in their time dialectics: "the unity and struggle of opposites" (author in Google)
    2. Genry
      Genry 26 May 2016 10: 03
      0
      As they taught in their time dialectics: "the unity and struggle of opposites" (author in Google)
  35. ver_
    ver_ 25 May 2016 08: 59
    +2
    Quote: Vadya
    Without complexes ... wow, how she danced !!! wink

    Quote: Vadya
    Without complexes ... wow, how she danced !!! wink

    ..and how much did you train?
  36. ver_
    ver_ 25 May 2016 16: 09
    +1
    Quote: Homo
    And again, silently minus. But because there is nothing to answer! tongue

    Quote: Homo
    And again, silently minus. But because there is nothing to answer! tongue

    ..I didn’t set minuses, however, it’s kind of cloying, or something .. feel this ..
  37. user3970
    user3970 25 May 2016 18: 38
    +2
    Well, let's honestly admit that Ukraine pros ... if our diplomats represented by the same black-eyed man that I remember Basayev had in Budenovsk in all the poses of the Kama Sutra, which managed to take possession of almost a controlling stake in Gazprom (the gdp then squeezed them out ), zurabov, this character as an official overwhelmed everything that could be overwhelmed. Now it is lit up in negotiations in Minsk. Horseradish diplomat. And how many dozens of Russians are sitting on far-fetched accusations of the SGA? Where are the landings in Russia and their forced voluntary export from European countries? Where are Sudoplatov? We have diplomats in Russia, like shoe polish in a shoe polish factory! Try to contact the Russian embassy or consulate abroad in case of force majeure! Yes, we can dance and the legs are beautiful. It is what it is.
  38. VB
    VB 25 May 2016 18: 52
    +3
    I don’t understand only one thing, why our Foreign Ministry, television, and the press do not announce to the whole world that after they deploy anti-missile defense elements in such and such a country, in the event of war, this country, such and such cities will be hit. According to the results, so many people will die, so many cities will disappear from the face of the earth, etc. The people of these countries, in particular the Poles, are in a blissful state of happiness and arrogance, are convinced and already want to fight with us and call on their people to do this. I communicate with the Poles, I hear this, what their press writes, I wonder. Why our media do not bring to their attention, what if .... The Polish question will be finally resolved. It’s not time for them to think hard, and not only for them, how to behave?
    1. valentber
      valentber 26 May 2016 18: 33
      +1
      The question is rhetorical. Our Foreign Ministry is not at all as brilliant as it follows from most comments.
  39. certero
    certero 25 May 2016 19: 11
    +1
    Quote: Diana Ilyina
    Step up against Russia, there’s a war going on, and it’s the real war, just the bombs are falling not in Russia, but in Syria, the Donbass, Karabakh and other places

    No need to invent. There is no real war against Russia. But not thanks to diplomats, but thanks to those Soviet people who created the atomic sword. And due to the fact that this sword was not drained for years after.
  40. Munchhausen
    Munchhausen 25 May 2016 21: 40
    -4
    Sober danced, so not interesting.
  41. Vostok35
    Vostok35 26 May 2016 13: 45
    +1
    Well done, our Masha)))
  42. 4 wheels
    4 wheels 26 May 2016 22: 31
    +1
    Oh, I like Masha! Clever and charming! love
    A real Russian girl - doesn’t climb into her pocket for a word, burns in full, but correctly wink
    Keep it up! yes
  43. Russian people
    Russian people 27 May 2016 01: 01
    0
    Kalinka is not able to dance. Stalin hates more than Hitler. Bawdy jokes tells. Waste