Military Review

Obama: Moscow does not show enough interest in reducing nuclear potential

89
According to Barack Obama, Moscow is not sufficiently interested in reducing the arsenal of nuclear weapons, reports RIA News.


Obama: Moscow does not show enough interest in reducing nuclear potential


In an interview with the NHK channel, Obama recalled that during his time as president, he “managed to sign a new offensive arms reduction treaty (START-3) with Moscow, which made it possible to reduce the nuclear potential of both states”.

“I think that we can go further (in arms reduction), but so far Russia has not shown any interest in doing more”,
he declared.

In addition, Obama stressed that he was not going to apologize "for the atomic bombing of Hiroshima."

According to him, “every manager has to make very difficult decisions, especially during a war.”
Photos used:
EPA-registered household disinfectants
89 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. evgenii67
    evgenii67 22 May 2016 10: 58
    +45
    What a scoundrel !!! you cut your missile defense there to begin with.
    1. BARKAS
      BARKAS 22 May 2016 11: 07
      +39
      To begin with, let the nuclear weapons outside the United States let them then express their opinions and apologize to the Japanese for Hiroshima and Nagasaki!
      1. Teberii
        Teberii 22 May 2016 11: 12
        +24
        This is who is building the missile defense system, and even reproaches us for not wanting to unload. "And don't give the keys to the apartment where the money is."
        1. bulvas
          bulvas 22 May 2016 11: 31
          +16

          This is who will surpass our neighbors in the saying "look in the eyes - God's dew"

          - so these are Americans

          After they invented the explanation "nothing personal - just business", for them

          there are no boundaries of arrogance
          1. techie
            techie 22 May 2016 11: 48
            +4
            This is who will surpass our neighbors in the saying "look in the eyes - God's dew"

            Well, no one can surpass our neighbors in terms of "God's dew". For it is said about them. The Yankees are just inept imitators, although they try very hard, of course .. laughing
            1. Fegelein
              Fegelein 22 May 2016 14: 53
              0
              Will the Chinese also reduce themselves and decrease in numbers along with everyone?
              1. Mahmut
                Mahmut 22 May 2016 20: 06
                +1
                Barachich forgot that the condition for the emergence of agreements to reduce S.N. served as an agreement on a ban on missile defense. Otherwise, a nuclear club is cheaply reliable and practical.
                1. Fegelein
                  Fegelein 22 May 2016 21: 22
                  0
                  It was about the Chinese
            2. Fegelein
              Fegelein 22 May 2016 14: 53
              +1
              Will the Chinese also reduce themselves and decrease in numbers along with everyone?
          2. Pirogov
            Pirogov 22 May 2016 11: 51
            +5
            Quote: bulvas
            This is who will surpass our neighbors in the saying "look in the eyes - God's dew"

            - so these are Americans

            After they invented the explanation "nothing personal - just business", for them

            there are no boundaries of arrogance

            Conclusion: you need to take their approach into service, and this is only the protection of their own interests and people ....
          3. Lelek
            Lelek 22 May 2016 16: 59
            +2
            Quote: bulvas
            This is who will surpass our neighbors in the saying "look in the eyes - God's dew"


            That's for sure. When Barack Husseinovich uttered these words, his Pentagon official, someone Wark, said another:
            (cry)
          4. cap
            cap 22 May 2016 18: 27
            +1
            Quote: bulvas
            This is who will surpass our neighbors in the saying "look in the eyes - God's dew"

            - so these are Americans

            After they invented the explanation "nothing personal - just business", for them

            there are no boundaries of arrogance

            bear
        2. Lukich
          Lukich 22 May 2016 12: 09
          +9
          Quote: Teberii
          This is who is building the missile defense system, and even reproaches us for not wanting to unload. "And don't give the keys to the apartment where the money is."
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Finches
      Finches 22 May 2016 11: 08
      +28
      By the way, I would like to recall the unprecedented opportunity to make the world generally nuclear-free! This could have happened on October 11, 1986, when the General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee Mikhail Raisovich Gorbachev made a stunning proposal to the actor - US President Ronald Reagan at a meeting in Reykjavik: to sign an agreement on the complete nuclear disarmament of both countries within 10 years! And this proposal from the "evil empire" was silenced in the world by the efforts of the "good empire"! Reagan said no! Obama would need to know history before presenting himself as a dove of peace, although, incidentally, he does it badly ... laughing
      1. Maxom75
        Maxom75 22 May 2016 11: 34
        +20
        Gorbachev wanted everyone to like it so much that he was ready to flush the country into the toilet, which, in principle, he did, and Yeltsin almost finished it off.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. Igor Polovodov
          Igor Polovodov 22 May 2016 12: 19
          +9
          Thank god the buchek broke ...
    3. Starover_Z
      Starover_Z 22 May 2016 11: 15
      +9
      Quote: evgenii67
      What a scoundrel !!! you cut your missile defense there to begin with.

      According to Barack Obama, Moscow is not sufficiently interested in reducing the nuclear arsenal

      Give up your overseas military bases, and then let's talk, "peacemaker" with a tomahawk!
    4. vovanpain
      vovanpain 22 May 2016 11: 47
      +13
      “I think that we can go further (in arms reduction), but so far Russia has not shown any interest in doing more”,

      well, yes, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia, Libya, have done more that are now in the Stone Age request But Russia is not bad. yes
    5. skeptic
      skeptic 22 May 2016 13: 31
      +5
      Quote: evgenii67
      What a scoundrel !!! you cut your missile defense there to begin with.



      Why are you so! We just need to agree to the consideration of this issue, but first return to our territorial borders air defense, nuclear weapons, and also bring to the common denominator of the strategic nuclear forces of NATO countries with Russia, ships, submarines, aircraft, etc. And also withdraw all bordering countries from military blocs with obligations to protect them, jointly, from third countries.

      We should not give up peace plans, but set appropriate conditions, even more peaceful ones (which the West does not accept).
    6. samoletil18
      samoletil18 22 May 2016 21: 52
      -1
      First, Yellowstone will reduce the United States, and then Russia will place a couple of warheads in the warehouse.
  2. Oleg16661
    Oleg16661 22 May 2016 10: 58
    +19
    If our leadership will reduce nuclear weapons in the light of recent NATO actions, I will seriously doubt their adequacy and capacity as leaders of our country.
    1. Sagittarius YaNAO
      Sagittarius YaNAO 22 May 2016 14: 10
      +2
      As long as the US exists, not a gram can be reduced. And why in the media they do not say how many nuclear weapons mattresses have outside the United States, you need to constantly scroll through this information.
  3. ded100
    ded100 22 May 2016 10: 58
    +13
    Monkey what to take from him! laughing
    1. Kos_kalinki9
      Kos_kalinki9 22 May 2016 11: 37
      +21
      Monkey what to take from him
      1. Nosgoth
        Nosgoth 22 May 2016 15: 58
        -1
        the only pity is that this is just a photoshop (the letter "H" is lower than the others) ... :-(
  4. Spartanez300
    Spartanez300 22 May 2016 10: 59
    +8
    And it says the main global mastermind of armed conflict.
  5. 31rus2
    31rus2 22 May 2016 10: 59
    +8
    Dear, in addition, Russia is developing new models of weapons, as well as improving existing ones, yes, yes, gentlemen, "democrats", according to you, there will be no more
  6. sgazeev
    sgazeev 22 May 2016 11: 00
    +13
    After the disarmament of the United States.
    1. noWAR
      noWAR 22 May 2016 11: 12
      +3
      Quote: sgazeev
      After the disarmament of the United States.

      Smiled. How to post on enemy resources?
      1. noWAR
        noWAR 22 May 2016 11: 26
        +5
        Quote: noWAR
        Quote: sgazeev
        After the disarmament of the United States.

        Smiled. How to post on enemy resources?
      2. noWAR
        noWAR 22 May 2016 11: 26
        0
        Quote: noWAR
        Quote: sgazeev
        After the disarmament of the United States.

        Smiled. How to post on enemy resources?
        1. noWAR
          noWAR 22 May 2016 11: 45
          0
          To moderators. Remove unnecessary comments of mine. Including this one. crying
        2. noWAR
          noWAR 22 May 2016 11: 45
          0
          To moderators. Remove unnecessary comments of mine. Including this one. crying
  7. 3officer
    3officer 22 May 2016 11: 01
    +8
    The problem is that Moscow is not interested in reducing its nuclear potential to please Washington-Obama directly Captain Evidence laughing
    1. LÄRZ
      LÄRZ 22 May 2016 15: 08
      +2
      Quote: 3officer
      The problem is that Moscow is not interested in reducing its nuclear potential to please Washington-Obama

      Undoubtedly, in the 21 century it is important to reduce the number of nuclear weapons, since the nuclear powers have too many, but this does not mean that they will have to sacrifice their own security. Barack Obama does not understand this. He publicly stated that he was not satisfied with the pace of nuclear disarmament in Russia. According to him, the States are doing everything to reduce the global nuclear potential, but the Russian Federation does not show interest in this matter. However, the US president is cunning and this is obvious, since Russia is reducing the number of nuclear warheads and if the pace of their destruction does not satisfy Obama personally, this does not mean that Vladimir Putin must catch his head and destroy his own weapons headlong. from the USA. Their military most often uses harsh language when it comes to Russia and our weapons. It is difficult to admit that Russian weapons are more perfect? Moreover, our military power in all its glory has shown itself in Syria, which has earned the trust of both the Syrians and investors.
  8. 73bor
    73bor 22 May 2016 11: 01
    +16
    He signed START-3 and withdrew from the ABM Treaty; do you hope for a global strike without consequences? And why not immediately call-disarm Russia!
    1. Muvka
      Muvka 22 May 2016 12: 20
      +1
      Quote: 73bor
      He signed START-3 and withdrew from the ABM Treaty; do you hope for a global strike without consequences? And why not immediately call-disarm Russia!

      In fairness, it’s like Bush withdrew from the ABM Treaty. Although maybe I remember something wrong.
      1. 73bor
        73bor 22 May 2016 18: 17
        0
        Well, it's just the details, Bush came out and this one followed in the footsteps and is deploying missile defense in Romania and Poland!
  9. Pereira
    Pereira 22 May 2016 11: 01
    +10
    Not interested enough? Well, get interested. Anything to offer besides missile defense at our borders?
  10. Hyhy
    Hyhy 22 May 2016 11: 01
    +9
    OK, what. Put all kinds of missile defense around and something else to talk about reduction. The smoked cuckoo went. Hohlobred infected?
    Only after you.
  11. t118an
    t118an 22 May 2016 11: 02
    +9
    According to Obama, Russia again does not want to improve the attitude. The American in his repertoire once again blaming Russia, once again with the help of a CIA agent sent to the Kremlin, it was disarmament that it’s not completely disarmed .. enough
  12. ovod84
    ovod84 22 May 2016 11: 02
    +7
    But why disarm when everyone is arming. The United States can disarm, we are not opposed.
  13. Yak28
    Yak28 22 May 2016 11: 03
    +12
    So without Russia’s nuclear weapons, Russia won’t be able to fight a war with NATO, the navy’s serious lag in the number of planes, and the cat burst into tears of combat-ready people who want to fight in Russia. Therefore, the nuclear potential must be increased, and the number of missiles and their thrust-weight ratio, let the states ache but it’s impossible to reduce nuclear weapons. Yeltsin has already undermined the country's defense capabilities
  14. LÄRZ
    LÄRZ 22 May 2016 11: 06
    +7
    According to Barack Obama, Moscow is not sufficiently interested in reducing the nuclear arsenal
    Well, what's the matter, interest us, if only you really want it. We managed to interest us in the START-3 treaty, and we signed it. And if again, as always, "one-sided game", we, of course, will not go for it. Gone are the days of the Gorbachev-Yeltsian "deflections" in front of you, our interests will be taken into account in full. If, of course, you really want to reduce the arsenal of nuclear weapons.
    1. Orionvit
      Orionvit 22 May 2016 13: 02
      +2
      Only one thing is relevant here. Listen to what Western presidents say, and do the opposite.
  15. Yak-15
    Yak-15 22 May 2016 11: 06
    +3
    So she wants to tell the Black Baboon - go to you prick !!!!
  16. Monos
    Monos 22 May 2016 11: 07
    +9
    “I think that we can go further (in arms reduction), but so far Russia has not shown any interest in doing more”,


    Well, cut back! We do not mind. And not only we, the whole World are interested in reducing your nuclear weapons and in reducing your military budget. And we will help if necessary. In the neighborhood.
  17. Tektor
    Tektor 22 May 2016 11: 09
    +2
    It is enough for Mr. Obama to re-read the preamble of the agreement he signed to add 1 + 1 and not look like an idiot.
  18. mamont5
    mamont5 22 May 2016 11: 09
    +2
    Quote: Oleg16661
    If our leadership will reduce nuclear weapons in the light of recent NATO actions, I will seriously doubt their adequacy and capacity as leaders of our country.

    Why think so badly about our NOW leadership?
  19. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 22 May 2016 11: 14
    +7
    National interests and sovereignty above all else. The West is like a down, without a club behind its back it is not controlled. And with a club, soul-guy!
  20. behemot
    behemot 22 May 2016 11: 18
    +3
    a monkey can’t wait to fight, stupid people think to sit in America. It will be interesting what hamburger eaters will eat when the nuclear winter comes. Maybe they will devour the frame, along with Hillary - also a bloodthirsty witch.
  21. alex47russ
    alex47russ 22 May 2016 11: 21
    +4
    Now, just laces off!)))
  22. PPD
    PPD 22 May 2016 11: 23
    +3
    The guy has problems with his head! wassat
    It was necessary to combine everything together:
    He doesn’t want to disarm, but not just repent for Hiroshima, we won’t apologize.
    Concert and only, by the way-
    Speaker Barack Obama, he will perform the work of DBKabalevsky Clowns,
    although probably here in the singular-clown. laughing
  23. Tusv
    Tusv 22 May 2016 11: 24
    +2
    We would love to be friends, just the iron for ironing shoelaces has broken. We cannot set up production either. The economy is this, in shreds
  24. beer-youk
    beer-youk 22 May 2016 11: 28
    +2
    The abbreviation in the Amer’s way is for keeping, and ours is under the knife. Thanks, have already passed.
  25. atamankko
    atamankko 22 May 2016 11: 30
    +1
    He really considers himself an "exceptional" politician,
    how much the disease worsened.
  26. Reptiloid
    Reptiloid 22 May 2016 11: 33
    +2
    He doesn’t notice a log in his eye ...
    Over in the 90s Our people have cut a lot, but in vain.
    America's dream --- sitting on our neck and hanging legs.
  27. Zena20298
    Zena20298 22 May 2016 11: 33
    +2
    Was this monkey completely confused? We’ll straighten the laces and drop the slippers and run to disarm ...
  28. egor-kz
    egor-kz 22 May 2016 11: 36
    +2
    Quote: Pereira
    Not interested enough? Well, get interested. Anything to offer besides missile defense at our borders?

    Well, why? There is still the ability to store their own missiles, while Russia has conscientiously destroyed its own! God forbid to return to us at this time ...
  29. egor-kz
    egor-kz 22 May 2016 11: 38
    0
    Quote: Zena20298
    Was this monkey completely confused? We’ll straighten the laces and drop the slippers and run to disarm ...

    laughing laughing laughing
  30. Darwin
    Darwin 22 May 2016 11: 38
    +2
    The problem is not whether we’ll disarm or not, there is parity with SGA at the moment, but we must take into account the number of nuclear weapons in other NATO countries. Yao should not be below the level sufficient for a retaliatory strike. Only the possibility of mutual destruction stops them from attacking our country.
  31. Anchonsha
    Anchonsha 22 May 2016 11: 38
    +1
    The black baboon, march on a palm tree. You’re already tired of everyone, horseradish peacemaker
  32. BOB044
    BOB044 22 May 2016 11: 42
    0
    “I think that we can go further (in arms reduction), but so far Russia has not shown any interest in doing more”,
    You Obama look foolish among your satellites. We have enough of the nuclear weapons that we have, only we will do it even more efficiently.
  33. NordUral
    NordUral 22 May 2016 11: 51
    0
    Right now, we ran away to cut. Roll away from our borders and from Europe, then we'll talk. And then, on condition that it is mandatory (although you believe yourself more expensive, but at least something) to refuse to launch a sudden nuclear or non-nuclear first strike.
  34. gingerbread man 59
    gingerbread man 59 22 May 2016 11: 53
    0
    I am generally for disarmament the only way. we store and they saw
  35. fif21
    fif21 22 May 2016 11: 54
    +4
    And the northern animal "scribe" sneaks up on the mattress toppers from the other side wassat Americans are beginning to respect our Armed Forces, but let them remain in the delusion about Russia's "torn" economy. Well, who can defeat the country in which such women live?
    1. gingerbread man 59
      gingerbread man 59 22 May 2016 12: 41
      +3
      and still no one will defeat us with such roads
      1. fif21
        fif21 22 May 2016 13: 05
        0
        Quote: Gingerbread Man 59
        and still no one will defeat us with such roads
        ABOUT ! Me, me Rusish Autobahn Das Is Fantasy wassat A patching is an insidious plan for the Russians! Go figure out which patch the land mine wassat And the village of Gryaznukha will not be taken by the NATO tank regiment, even if it is defended by one district police officer with "Makar"! NATY has no equipment capable of conquering Russian roads wassat
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Mordvin
      Mordvin 22 May 2016 18: 48
      0
      We put the asphalt
      Partly and a bit
      So that every occupier
      Stuck at the approaches

      Such a song was someone the author does not remember, from the history like the Germans by the end of 1941 complained to their command that the tanks had track tracks and piston rings in the engines worn out.
  36. AIR-ZNAK
    AIR-ZNAK 22 May 2016 11: 57
    +6
    The political system of the United States of America is structured in such a way that if LeMur is imprisoned instead of a baboon, nothing changes, the President is strictly limited in his abilities. But he can talk as much as you want, and he doesn’t seriously listen to this stupid chatter and didn’t sign it — all this goes through several stages of approval until it becomes law or contract. This is an examination by the vice president of the US State Department and the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US Army and then approval by the party that promoted it and, finally, approval by the Senate and the House of Representatives. Such a lengthy procedure does not allow adopt some law or agreement if the headman * has a roof * and this headman knows and understands it and therefore only says that he will be brought on a note written by his * assistants * that is, curators of A * flirting * presidents are simply removed and DF Kennedy is far from the first
  37. akudr48
    akudr48 22 May 2016 12: 08
    -1
    Finally, Russia has not shown sufficient interest in what the Americans are interested in!
    And before, it showed, and even how, starting with Gorbachev, then Yeltsin, and today's very first exchanged the naval base in Kamrani and the intelligence center in Cuba just for fu fu, waiting in vain for interest from overseas.

    NF is a trump ace in a game with world cheaters and dumping it on the American sixes is simply stupid.
    1. Cat man null
      Cat man null 22 May 2016 12: 33
      +2
      Quote: akudr48
      Finally, Russia has not shown sufficient interest in what the Americans are interested in!

      Have you been sleeping for eight years and you just woke up? Prior to this, Russia:

      - tamed Georgia (remember?)
      - annexed Crimea
      - introduced "counter-sanctions". Contrary to the WTO norms, by the way, the entry into which there is only lazy .. did not lay around the perimeter
      - broke the "partners" the entire raspberry plant in Syria

      These are only the most obvious of the things that were "against the grain" striped "partners".

      Quote: akudr48
      ... today's best traded naval base in Kamrani and the intelligence center in Cuba just for fu fu ...

      Lourdes in 1996-2000 cost 300 million raccoons a year. Three hundred million, Karl! This was exactly when the country was in debt for the most part (thanks to EBN) and there was no money in the country. From the word "absolutely".

      Cam Ranh has not been used since the mid-90s. Also from the word "absolutely".

      And you just have to throw something - "after all, you bastards, all-pro-salipolymers" .. this, dear, the easiest way is just .. to think (at least a little) is much more difficult yes

      PS: minuscenters - face! laughing
  38. The comment was deleted.
  39. K-50
    K-50 22 May 2016 12: 44
    +1
    Russia has not shown interest in doing more

    But why? belay
    No, with such "gentlemen" there must be a big, thick, knotty club in the sleeve. So that if something is suddenly forgotten, you could hit them on the head, so that they "shove" with their brains. And without a club on the skull too quickly everyone forgets that there is only one planet and it is small, but everyone wants to live normally.
  40. iouris
    iouris 22 May 2016 13: 05
    +2
    Until the victory of the world revolution, Moscow should not have shown any interest in reducing nuclear potential.
  41. Alexandr2637
    Alexandr2637 22 May 2016 13: 09
    +1
    Here is a filthy monkey!
    And on the contrary, Russia needs only to build up and improve nuclear weapons and their delivery vehicles to the territory of our worst enemy - the USA!
  42. APASUS
    APASUS 22 May 2016 13: 10
    0
    Shitty disarm, the whole point of what has been said.
    It’s always interesting to see how the NATO members remain, as it were, with nothing, because disarmament concerns only the USA and Russia. I see the Americans once again trying to lead us into the arms race.
  43. sw6513
    sw6513 22 May 2016 13: 28
    0
    The soot has completely beached the coast, they are standing very close to the borders and still disarm? -Maybe he can take out the keys
  44. nik230794
    nik230794 22 May 2016 13: 30
    0
    All of Europe is stuffed with military bases, and they want voluntary disarmament from Russia ... More than enough has been said about the unconditional need for a nuclear shield in Russia. Strategic missile forces, strategic nuclear missile submarines of the types: Squid, Dolphin, Shark and Borey, as well as strategic bombers, are the only weighty arguments that deter Russia's geopolitical enemies from open military confrontation.
  45. Yugra
    Yugra 22 May 2016 13: 33
    0
    No, nigga mess, we’ll only build up nuclear weapons. We don’t trust your sweet speeches ...
  46. Pyokhar
    Pyokhar 22 May 2016 13: 41
    0
    To the West. Yes, give the goats, entoy monkey is one Nobel Peace Prize: just to shut up. laughing
  47. SeregaBoss
    SeregaBoss 22 May 2016 14: 12
    0
    Well, babama, well, balobol, well, balobolish!
  48. F.Vastag
    F.Vastag 22 May 2016 14: 17
    0
    Tricky Monkey.
  49. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 22 May 2016 14: 22
    0
    The presence of nuclear weapons only saved Russia from "democratization" in the American way. And now - let them be afraid. For them, unacceptable damage - for us - a question of existence.
  50. weksha50
    weksha50 22 May 2016 14: 36
    0
    ““ I think we can go further (in reducing armaments), but so far, Russia has not shown interest in doing more"" ...

    Hmm ... For some reason, Obama does not want to understand that Russia, by and large, must have not only at least US parity, but also with NATO as a whole (Naglia, France have their own nuclear weapons) and also such US allies as Pakistan , Israel have nuclear weapons as well - to deter possible threats from the East ... There, too, someone who wants to take advantage of the Russian territories has nuclear weapons and modern armies ...

    I won't poke a finger, but there are enough threats to us, Russia, from all sides, and we should have a "present" ready for everyone ...

    So, speaking of parity with the USA, Obama is practically trying to leave us naked and without a baton in his hand, surrounded by a flock of rabid dogs ...