Azerbaijan will acquire tactical missiles

223
The Azerbaijani Defense Ministry is working on the acquisition of tactical missile systems with a range of up to 500 km, reports Interfax-Azerbaijan statement of the commander of the missile forces Zahid Huseynov.

Azerbaijan will acquire tactical missiles


"The Azerbaijani armed forces are working on the acquisition of long-range tactical missiles," Huseynov told reporters.

According to him, “for reliable defense capability, Azerbaijan should acquire tactical missiles with a radius of 200, 300 and 500 kilometers”.

At the same time, the general stressed: ““ We do not want a war with any state. But, as they say, "if you want peace, prepare for war." Armament is necessary for this. "

Huseynov said that “the fire systems available today in Azerbaijan’s weapons enable them to strike at any military object of the enemy in the occupied Azerbaijani territories.”

“We can deliver pinpoint strikes on any object of the enemy. If the Supreme Commander orders, we can strike at Yerevan ",
added on.
  • http://interfax.az
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

223 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +35
    21 May 2016 11: 12
    Yeah! And for this it was necessary to destroy the Union? Like everything else that is happening throughout the former great country.
    1. +53
      21 May 2016 11: 16
      we can strike in Yerevan as well ”

      Absolutely fool the attic was torn off, then right away in Gyumri, so that they would get the answer in full and they wouldn’t be tormented anymore. Damn this circus, it would be better to find out the relations in sports. negative
      1. +5
        21 May 2016 11: 27
        . Azerbaijan will acquire operational tactical missiles

        Is anyone selling these?
        1. +6
          21 May 2016 11: 30
          The Chinese, probably.
          1. +6
            21 May 2016 12: 08
            Quote: Stas157
            . Azerbaijan will acquire operational tactical missiles

            Is anyone selling these?



            If desired, they will find it, but it will be a potential threat to Russia.
            1. +3
              21 May 2016 15: 52
              If there is demand, there will be supply.
            2. +5
              21 May 2016 18: 17
              If desired, they will find it, but it will be a potential threat to Russia.
              They will buy from Russia.
              1. -1
                21 May 2016 22: 23
                Quote: aleks700
                They will buy from Russia.

                And Russia will sell, because there are more than those who want to sell in the world than potential buyers. Russia will refuse - the Chinese or turkeys will immediately seize the opportunity to enter the market, and not just with missiles. Yes, even the very same Kim Jr. will not refuse live currency, his missiles are of course **, but he doesn’t need to be grumbling around the cities with special accuracy.
                If they cover Gyumri with these missiles, it will be an irony of fate.
                1. +1
                  21 May 2016 22: 59
                  There will be no irony. Gyumri will not cover. Aliyev is not entirely inadequate.
            3. +1
              21 May 2016 23: 49
              What threat can Azerbaijan pose to Russia ??
              1. 0
                22 May 2016 06: 05
                Quote: uran
                What threat can Azerbaijan pose to Russia ??

                All Azerbaijanis will leave the Russian markets (bazaars)! laughing
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. +4
            21 May 2016 14: 05
            Quote: armored optimist
            The Chinese, probably.

            And Turkey is not taken into account by you?
          4. The comment was deleted.
          5. PKK
            -5
            21 May 2016 14: 49
            China does not dare to sell, it goes against not only Russia, but also against globalists. Azerbaijan Igilovites had to cut it for a long time. Only Russia saves it. There is only one option, OTR, they will sell crazy Yankees. It will only be troublesome to do such things under sideways of Russia.
        2. +7
          21 May 2016 11: 50
          Is anyone selling these? Df-15 (China) Shahin-1 (Pakistan) Shebah-2 (Iran)
        3. The comment was deleted.
          1. The comment was deleted.
        4. +4
          21 May 2016 12: 21
          Quote: Stas157
          . Azerbaijan will acquire operational tactical missiles

          Is anyone selling these?

          China, Iran, Russia. Ukraine (in my opinion), sort of like Belarus, and of course SSHA, Germany, France. England and many more countries.
          1. +3
            21 May 2016 14: 52
            but the fact that they are forbidden to sell missiles with a range of more than 300 km in an international voice?
            1. +5
              21 May 2016 15: 01
              Quote: just explo
              but the fact that they are forbidden to sell missiles with a range of more than 300 km in an international voice?

              According to the "technical application" of the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) in
              Category I (consisting of 2 sections) actually prohibits transferring missiles to other states as a whole with a maximum range of 300 km or more with a payload weight of 500 kg or more (it is possible to recalculate the weight of the payload in range and vice versa). It is also forbidden to transfer complete systems (engines, control systems, software, technologies) used for complete delivery vehicles.
              Accordingly, judging by the smaller load, judging by the load, the radius of 300 km is a lot for Armenia, even too much.
              1. +2
                21 May 2016 16: 49
                not . 300 km limit. therefore, they do not sell anti-ship missiles with a range of more than 300 km. their warhead is significantly less than 500 kg.
                what you have given is forbidden to sell rockets with a range of more than 300 km AND with a warhead weight of 500 kg or more.
                that is, even if the range is 200 km. then warheads should still be less than half a ton.
                North Korea puts everything on it, since it is already under sanctions and no one will do anything to it. for all that they could have done.
            2. PKK
              0
              22 May 2016 07: 23
              You can’t be so naive. Declare that a rocket flies 280 km and a warhead weight of 200 kg and officially trade. Who and how will prove that the rocket flies further? And during the war, it suddenly turns out that it pulls a ton, by a thousand and a half.
          2. +2
            21 May 2016 14: 54
            Quote: atalef
            China, Iran, Russia. Ukraine (in my opinion), sort of like Belarus, and of course SSHA, Germany, France. England and many more countries.

            More? Russia, it seems, limits the range of missiles to 300 km. Ukraine, of course, would have sold everything, but nothing.
          3. +4
            21 May 2016 15: 56
            500km is forbidden to sell a maximum of 280 or to produce for at least 1000
          4. -3
            21 May 2016 17: 48
            China, Iran, Russia. ,,
            I don’t think that Russia should be on your list — an extra headache is not needed.
        5. -1
          21 May 2016 16: 50
          Quote: Stas157
          . Azerbaijan will acquire operational tactical missiles

          Is anyone selling these?


          They trade, but the range of everything that can be sold is limited to 300 km.
          Therefore, the Brahmos just 300km fly.
          1. +2
            21 May 2016 18: 35
            Quote: Alex777
            They trade, but the range of everything that can be sold is limited to 300 km.
            Therefore, the Brahmos just 300km fly.

            Well, that’s understandable! The article is about 500 km tactical missiles! No MLRS so fly.
            1. 0
              21 May 2016 23: 18
              Bramos has a version for firing at ground targets.
              The most tactical missile ever.
              But the treaty on the non-proliferation of rocket technology, even independently making Bramos Indians sticks in the wheel inserted.
      2. +6
        21 May 2016 11: 28
        Quote: vovanpain
        . Damn tired of this circus, it would be better in the sport to find out the relationship.

        Or in the bazaar ...)))) But what’s most interesting in the markets is behaving decently! They don’t throw tomatoes, they do not hit each other with carnations in the face ... Paradox! laughing
        1. +8
          21 May 2016 11: 40
          Quote: CORNET
          They don’t throw tomatoes, they do not hit each other with carnations in the face ... Paradox!

          It would be better to throw tomatoes than grenades and shells.
          Quote: CORNET
          But what is most interesting about the markets is behaving decently

          They would try to sort things out there, immediately the income from sales of the same tomato and cloves would fall, and for that they would have beaten their elders on the head like that, mom wouldn’t worry. hi
      3. 0
        21 May 2016 12: 09
        Our team is also in Yerevan
      4. -21
        21 May 2016 12: 13
        What are you so! Rogozin do not care, he will sell!
        1. -11
          21 May 2016 18: 02
          Quote: finish
          What are you so! Rogozin do not care, he will sell!

          Finish, why are you so mercilessly zamusnovat? Quieter at the bends, otherwise they will be sent to an eternal ban. Rogozin is for Russians everything is ours, you have encroached on the holy things, maybe they don’t know that after the April battles in Karabakh the timid requests of the Armenian leadership to stop the supply of offensive weapons to Azerbaijan the great Rogozin tweeted:
          "We have sold and we will sell".
          A logical question arises:
          "What is the price of Armenian blood?"
          And if the current leaders of Armenia, due to their complete illegitimacy, are afraid to ask Russia about this, then others will replace them, and they will pose this question to the so-called ally.
          1. +10
            21 May 2016 18: 24
            Quote: razmik72
            razmik72 seg

            Quote: HERMES
            HERMES (1)

            Quote: HERMES
            Yeraz (5)

            Quote: vovanpain
            xetai9977 (2)

            Colleagues, you asked, I answered, read all my comments about this news, I hope I answered all your questions, and if I’m always happy to answer, I was born in the USSR and served in the USSR and mourned and gave half of my salary to the victims of the earthquake in Armenia in 1988, a sibling who served in Derbent in 1989 never say a bad word about Azerbaijanis or Armenians, but if I offended my colleagues, I apologize hi but read I say all my comments, maybe I'm wrong, but a contract is a contract. hi
          2. -3
            21 May 2016 21: 54
            YOU know, until recently, I respected him too. Spinning like a squirrel in a wheel, reviving the defense industry (or at least making an image that works). But after an ugly scandal with an apartment for 600 million and an even more ugly attempt to get away with it, plus his "April theses" , greatly undermined sympathy for him.
          3. +5
            21 May 2016 23: 06
            This so-called ally once saved the whole of Armenia from being cut out. But for Armenia to save Russia, I don’t remember this. So there is no need to emphasize the price of blood.
            1. +1
              21 May 2016 23: 38
              This so-called ally once saved the whole of Armenia from being cut out. But for Armenia to save Russia, I don’t remember this.

              Well, not all, but only a small part. Most of the still cut out.
              But to compare the numbers of Armenians and Russians killed in wars against common enemies, in absolute numbers, is not entirely correct, since Russia is huge and Armenia is small. Well, in the Great Patriotic War, Armenia gave 600 thousand. soldiers and officers. For 3 million Armenia, it’s the same as for Russia 30 million.
              1. 0
                21 May 2016 23: 57
                Quote: Fhvty
                Well, in the Great Patriotic War, Armenia gave 600 thousand. soldiers and officers. For 3 million Armenia, it’s the same as for Russia 30 million.

                You seem to be confusing ... Azerbaijan sent 600 people to the front. More than 000 died.
                In 1939, the population of the Armenian SSR was about 1.2 - 1.3 million people (you can add to them another 300-350 thousand living in the territory of the Azerbaijan SSR) ... about 35-45% were not ethnic Armenians (now it is 3 million people in Armenia, 96 % of which are Armenians). In 2000, the population of Armenia was about 3.8 million people. In 2014, the number fell to 2.9 million, and this is only official.
                And based on the facts I described above (you can check it yourself) - how could Armenia send 600 people to the front, even taking into account all the Armenians of the USSR?

                I now understand why you are tired of comrade razmik72 ... maybe stop rushing empty words?
                1. +1
                  22 May 2016 01: 54
                  And based on the facts I described above

                  It’s good to lie, and call your lies facts.
                  And here is the official information:
                  In 1920 (the year of Sovietization), the population of Armenia was only 700 thousand people. By the beginning of the war, it had grown to 1,5 million people. However, the republic remained the smallest in the Soviet Union (1,1% of the population of the USSR). And yet, more than 1941 thousand people went into the ranks of the Soviet Army from 1945 to 500. Armenia and Armenians suffered heavy losses in World War II. Every second did not return from the front. The losses of Soviet Armenians can be compared with the losses of the American army (more than 300 thousand). The losses of the Armenians of the Diaspora are unknown to us, but about 200 thousand Armenians fought in the armies of the allied countries.
                  You seem to be confusing something ... 600 people sent to the front Azerbaijan

                  Of course, my grandfather left Baku for the front, and the fact that he is an Armenian is not important for you. Azerbaijan sent him! And Marshal Baghramyan and Khudyakov (Khanferyants) and Admiral Isakov also sent Azerbaijani people, because they are from Karabakh.
                  So your statistics are also riveted?
                  I now understand why you are tired of comrade razmik72

                  And this friend, I’m not at all a friend. Judging by his posts, this is more likely your comrade, he just covered himself with the Armenian name. Cossack mishandled. Or maybe it's your second nickname. Very similar to that.
                  1. +1
                    22 May 2016 02: 17
                    Quote: Fhvty
                    Of course, my grandfather left Baku for the front, and the fact that he is an Armenian is not important for you. Azerbaijan sent him! And Marshal Baghramyan and Khudyakov (Khanferyants) and Admiral Isakov also sent Azerbaijani people, because they are from Karabakh.
                    So your statistics are also riveted?

                    Yes, only you forgot about the Azerbaijanis of Armenia and you sent many of my relatives to the front to defend Leningrad, as a result of which there are many relatives here. And we went to the statistics of Armenia and many did not return from the front.
                    1. -1
                      22 May 2016 02: 37
                      Yes, only you forgot about the Azerbaijanis of Armenia and you sent many of my relatives to the front to defend Leningrad, as a result of which there are many relatives here. And we went to the statistics of Armenia and many did not return from the front.

                      Very few, within the limits of statistical error.
                  2. +3
                    22 May 2016 02: 39
                    Quote: Fhvty
                    It’s good to lie, and call your lies facts.

                    It may be that I am twisting the facts in my favor ... but the fact is that I do not lie.
                    Quote: Fhvty
                    And this friend, I’m not at all a friend. Judging by his posts, this is more likely your comrade, he just covered himself with the Armenian name. Cossack mishandled. Or maybe it's your second nickname. Very similar to that.

                    Comrade ... I ask you ... enough. Let us wish each other and our soldiers good night together. At least today. Enough debate and fights for today.

                    Peace be upon you and a clear sky above your house. Good night.
                    1. 0
                      22 May 2016 02: 50
                      Comrade ... I ask you ... enough. Let us wish each other and our soldiers good night together. At least today. Enough debate and fights for today.

                      Peace be upon you and a clear sky above your house. Good night.

                      I unconditionally agree. Peace to all and good nights.
                      But I have insomnia, so if you do not mind, I will still sit a bit.
                  3. 0
                    22 May 2016 06: 18
                    Quote: Fhvty
                    And based on the facts I described above

                    It’s good to lie, and call your lies facts.
                    And here is the official information:
                    In 1920 (the year of Sovietization), the population of Armenia was only 700 thousand people. By the beginning of the war, it had grown to 1,5 million people. However, the republic remained the smallest in the Soviet Union (1,1% of the population of the USSR). And yet, more than 1941 thousand people went into the ranks of the Soviet Army from 1945 to 500. Armenia and Armenians suffered heavy losses in World War II. Every second did not return from the front. The losses of Soviet Armenians can be compared with the losses of the American army (more than 300 thousand). The losses of the Armenians of the Diaspora are unknown to us, but about 200 thousand Armenians fought in the armies of the allied countries.
                    You seem to be confusing something ... 600 people sent to the front Azerbaijan

                    Of course, my grandfather left Baku for the front, and the fact that he is an Armenian is not important for you. Azerbaijan sent him! Marshal Baghramyan and Khudyakov (Khanferyants) and Admiral Isakov were also sent by Azerbaijanis, hell are from Karabakh.
                    So your statistics are also riveted?
                    I now understand why you are tired of comrade razmik72

                    And this friend, I’m not at all a friend. Judging by his posts, this is more likely your comrade, he just covered himself with the Armenian name. Cossack mishandled. Or maybe it's your second nickname. Very similar to that.

                    Calm down, Alexander, don’t rush like that, I’m not Hermes’s double and not his clone, just our points of view do not coincide with each other. This is probably due to the fact that you are a Russian Armenian, and I am a citizen of Armenia and live in my I clearly see the country that Armenia does not have a real ally, but Azerbaijan has such an ally in the person of Turkey, Pakistan, etc. This is the usual standard method of Russian trolls - instead of analyzing, they immediately throw accusations against the person - Russia saved you, not grateful, but you write that she supplies arms to Azerbaijan, instead of being grateful to her for the grave of life
              2. +3
                22 May 2016 00: 14
                "Well, not all, but only a small part" - and without Russia this "small part" was studied only in the context of "there was such a people." Armenians of course fought in the Second World War, BUT! The Russians saved the Armenians from extermination. Wrong?
                1. +2
                  22 May 2016 02: 33
                  BUT! The Russians saved the Armenians from extermination. Not right?

                  Right of course. Who argues. It’s not for nothing that the famous Armenian writer Khachatur Abovyan wrote: “May the hour be blessed when the sacred leg of the Russian soldier first set foot on the long-suffering Armenian land.”
                  And I say: Thank you, Mother Russia! (without irony)
                  1. 0
                    22 May 2016 07: 01
                    Quote: Fhvty
                    BUT! The Russians saved the Armenians from extermination. Not right?

                    Right of course. Who argues. It’s not for nothing that the famous Armenian writer Khachatur Abovyan wrote: “May the hour be blessed when the sacred leg of the Russian soldier first set foot on the long-suffering Armenian land.”
                    And I say: Thank you, Mother Russia! (without irony)

                    Alexander, you see that this chatterbox wrote lower in his comment: the Russians are arming the Azerbaijanis so that they fight with them with Turkey laughing wassat bully .The Azerbaijanis themselves were forced to enlighten the new strategist that they would not fight with Turkey for the sake of Russia.
              3. -3
                22 May 2016 05: 52
                Quote: Fhvty
                This so-called ally once saved the whole of Armenia from being cut out. But for Armenia to save Russia, I don’t remember this.

                Well, not all, but only a small part. Most of the still cut out.
                But to compare the numbers of Armenians and Russians killed in wars against common enemies, in absolute numbers, is not entirely correct, since Russia is huge and Armenia is small. Well, in the Great Patriotic War, Armenia gave 600 thousand. soldiers and officers. For 3 million Armenia, it’s the same as for Russia 30 million.

                What a small part of Armenia Russia has saved, it becomes more and more interesting for me, dear Alexander. Otherwise, there are forum users on this site who already reproach the "not grateful" Armenians for not wanting to admit that whole Russian divisions fought in Karabakh, and these not grateful Armenians, as always, do not want to admit it.
            2. 0
              21 May 2016 23: 55
              And in the very center of Leninakan, on the central square of the city, where the Russian guys then continued to share bread and the last shirt with the Armenians who suffered from the earthquake, Lieutenant Alexander Shapovalov, sergeants Yevgeny Poddubnyak and Oleg Yudintsev, privates Mikhail Karpov and Nikolai Maslennikov were greeted with heavy fire automatic weapons and grenade launcher. As experts later calculated, there were 216 holes in the car body of Shapovalov. Bullets and fragments literally tore young bodies and pure bold hearts of children.
              http://rosgeroika.ru/geroi-nashego-vremeni/2013/july/lejtenant-shapovalov-oruzhi

              ya-ne-predal
              1. 0
                22 May 2016 00: 05
                For the sake of fairness, I must say that in Azerbaijan, too, some numerous "subjects" did not like Russians. But I do not remember such shootings with Russians in Azerbaijan ... although they probably also took place.
                1. -1
                  22 May 2016 00: 23
                  I suppose that we are pumping Azerbaijan with weapons in order to circumvent the arms agreement in Europe. Meaning: Azerbaijan is our ally, and in the war against Turkey, he will act on our side.
                  1. +1
                    22 May 2016 00: 33
                    Quote: dr.star75
                    I suppose that we are pumping Azerbaijan with weapons in order to circumvent the arms agreement in Europe. Meaning: Azerbaijan is our ally, and in the war against Turkey, he will act on our side.

                    Personally, I don’t want a war between Russia and Turkey. Azerbaijan’s ally can quite, moreover, be an order of magnitude stronger and friendlier than Armenia .... but to go to war in Turkey ... people will not understand the power. Erdogan is a nobleman ... we don’t even like him.
                    1. +1
                      22 May 2016 00: 40
                      But Russia does not really want to fight Turkey. Turkey shot down our plane.
                      1. -1
                        22 May 2016 00: 56
                        Quote: dr.star75
                        But Russia does not really want to fight Turkey. Turkey shot down our plane.

                        Let's just say ... Erdogan shot down a Su-24 ... during the reign of Abdullah Gul, Turkey was a fairly friendly country for Russia.
                  2. +5
                    22 May 2016 02: 18
                    Quote: dr.star75
                    Meaning: Azerbaijan is our ally, and in the war against Turkey, he will act on our side.

                    Well, you are a dreamer))) Azerbaijanis will not shoot at the Turks. Even Stalin knew about this.
                  3. +2
                    22 May 2016 06: 54
                    Quote: dr.star75
                    I suppose that we are pumping Azerbaijan with weapons in order to circumvent the arms agreement in Europe. Meaning: Azerbaijan is our ally, and in the war against Turkey, he will act on our side.

                    I have nothing more to add - your comment says about the level of your competence.
            3. -1
              22 May 2016 05: 41
              Quote: dr.star75
              This so-called ally once saved the whole of Armenia from being cut out. But for Armenia to save Russia, I don’t remember this. So there is no need to emphasize the price of blood.

              Do not share the secret - this is when and where?
      5. 0
        21 May 2016 12: 35
        the main thing is that they do not want war)
      6. 0
        21 May 2016 12: 38
        Quote: vovanpain
        we can strike in Yerevan as well ”

        Absolutely fool the attic was torn off, then right away in Gyumri, so that they would get the answer in full and they wouldn’t be tormented anymore. Damn this circus, it would be better to find out the relations in sports. negative

        Azerbaijan still has Israeli tactical missiles with which it can strike at Nakhichevan from Yerevan.
        1. 0
          21 May 2016 13: 35
          Quote: razmik72
          Azerbaijan still has Israeli tactical missiles with which it can strike at Nakhichevan from Yerevan.

          And what are these? The names of the rockets in the studio please smile
          Is it not that the Armenian media have again started to persecute the theory of "Zhidomason collusion" now with Azerbaijan? wassatAlso tell Azerbaijan that "Jericho" with the most delicious filling was also handed over to Azerbaijan ...
          1. +5
            21 May 2016 14: 52
            Quote: HERMES
            Quote: razmik72
            Azerbaijan still has Israeli tactical missiles with which it can strike at Nakhichevan from Yerevan.

            And what are these? The names of the rockets in the studio please smile
            Is it not that the Armenian media have again started to persecute the theory of "Zhidomason collusion" now with Azerbaijan? wassatAlso tell Azerbaijan that "Jericho" with the most delicious filling was also handed over to Azerbaijan ...

            Yes, please, Hermes, I can enlighten, it will not rust after me:
            The modular MLRS Lynx of the Azerbaijani army with two four-shot packages of high-precision tactical-tactical missiles IMI EXTRA with a range of 130-150 kilometers.
            1. 0
              21 May 2016 15: 18
              I didn’t know about IMI EXTRA ... thanks. Although in my understanding the OTRK is 300km +.
              In principle, everyone will lose in this war ... even those who do not participate in it ... if the war is on the verge of defeat for us and there is a threat of the complete occupation of Azerbaijan, ... we will most likely fuck on Metsamor. And there will be a disaster .According to the "desire" of the wind, it will be decided what part of the huge territory will go into oblivion. If in this case the wind blows to the North, Armenia will not become.
              1. +9
                21 May 2016 19: 01
                Quote: HERMES
                e. If in this case the wind blows to the North, Armenia will not.

                Omar, I apologize, you are a smart person. You don’t have to show to the North, you know what obligations you have with NORTH. Azerbaijan may not become. If you offended I apologize. If you want, you are always ready for discussion, but you read my comments. You’ll understand everything. With YOU are very pleased to discuss. hi
              2. 0
                21 May 2016 20: 22
                As in 94g, Armenia will not have enough people, money and equipment to even get to the Kura. Karabakh is already a titanic effort for Armenia and I don’t think that the Turks will allow the collapse of Azerbaijan, even if Armenia has these things. And destroying Metsamor will mean a military attack and Azerbaijan will have to pay and pay for it.
                1. 0
                  21 May 2016 21: 31
                  Quote: Waha
                  And destroying Metsamor will mean a military attack and Azerbaijan will have to pay and pay for it.

                  In the scenario I have described, Azerbaijan will have nothing to lose ... those who need to be tried for such a thing will be dumped somewhere to the west. They will try to remove evil from the population ... this will dump Russia's reputation below the plinth, even among the allies.
                  1. +8
                    22 May 2016 06: 43
                    Quote: HERMES
                    .Try to sweep out evil on the population ... this will dump Russia's reputation below the plinth, even among allies

                    Omar, you are a smart person, you yourself understand that Russia has only 3 allies: the army, navy and VKS, and Omar please tell me when Russia took out evil over the civilian population? Answer, at least in PM. requestEven in Germany, for all the evil that we did, we remained human beings, not beasts. But your grandfather and my grandfather in the same trench may have been. Regards. hi
                    1. +2
                      22 May 2016 12: 28
                      Quote: vovanpain
                      Omar, you are a smart person

                      Something you started ... smart yes smart laughing I am tormented by vague doubts that you are kidding)
                      Quote: vovanpain
                      please tell me when Russia poured evil over the civilian population?

                      There were a couple of cases ... the first one that comes to mind - villages in East Prussia 1944 ... but it was rather revenge. Well, this is publicly available information ... true or not, I don’t know.
                      I had the honor of talking with many veterans ... they told me a lot of things at one time (one of my grandfathers who fought then didn’t really like to talk about the war). Something that will not be shown on TV, will not be written in books.
                2. +1
                  21 May 2016 23: 31
                  “I don’t think that the Turks will allow the collapse of Azerbaijan” - we forgot to ask the Turks. The Turks are busy with their Kurds, who have got MANPADS, which are being brought down by helicopters. Looks like they didn't get off with tomatoes.
            2. +3
              21 May 2016 19: 47
              And I was in Azerbaijan last month. Fell in love with this country.
              1. +2
                21 May 2016 20: 49
                Quote: seren
                And I was in Azerbaijan last month. Fell in love with this country.

                You have recognized more than once on this site more than once, an Israeli.
                1. +3
                  21 May 2016 22: 07
                  Quote: razmik72

                  You have recognized more than once on this site more than once, an Israeli.

                  This I admitted. My relatives lived in Baku, so I was a boy with them several times.
              2. +1
                21 May 2016 21: 38
                Quote: seren
                And I was in Azerbaijan last month. Fell in love with this country.

                But I am drawn to Israel ... I really want to visit Jerusalem. The problem is that, given that I have an Iranian stamp in my passport, some of my ancestors are from Iranian Azerbaijan (despite this, my great-great-grandfather served in the Russian Imperial Army) and a couple more factors ... if they even let me into the Promised Land, they will undoubtedly put a dozen MOSSAD agents on the tail drinks
                1. +2
                  21 May 2016 22: 09
                  Quote: HERMES
                  ... if they let me go to the promised land at all, they will undoubtedly put a dozen Mossad agents on the tail drinks

                  Rather, a SHABAK wink , but I think if they give a visa, then everyone will be on the drum.
                  1. -1
                    21 May 2016 22: 14
                    Quote: Aaron Zawi
                    Quote: HERMES
                    ... if they let me go to the promised land at all, they will undoubtedly put a dozen Mossad agents on the tail drinks

                    Rather, a SHABAK wink , but I think if they give a visa, then everyone will be on the drum.

                    That's it bully With my "couple of factors" they will also connect the SHABAK soldier
                2. +2
                  21 May 2016 22: 30
                  [quote = Seren] And I was in Azerbaijan last month. Fell in love with this country. [/ Quote]
                  But I am drawn to Israel ... I really want to visit Jerusalem. The problem is that, given that I have an Iranian stamp in my passport, some of my ancestors are from Iranian Azerbaijan (despite this, my great-great-grandfather served in the Russian Imperial Army) and a couple more factors ... if they even let me into the Promised Land, they will undoubtedly put a dozen MOSSAD agents on the tail drinks[/ Quote]


                  Do not consider yourself a figure equal to Churchill. If you are not sent to us, then you will not be of interest to anyone)))
                  1. 0
                    21 May 2016 22: 34
                    Quote: seren
                    Do not consider yourself a figure equal to Churchill. If you are not sent to us, then you will not be of interest to anyone)))

                    But Mossad doesn’t deal with small fish?) Give them a whale immediately tongue
                  2. +3
                    21 May 2016 23: 04
                    Quote: seren
                    Do not consider yourself a figure equal to Churchill. If you are not sent to us, then you will not be of interest to anyone)))

                    I think I will have fewer problems. Still, I’m a citizen of the Russian Federation, but I also want to go to Iran. So to learn about the life of the Azerbaijanis there. Here I sit and think who to go first to have less problems)
                    1. -2
                      22 May 2016 12: 34
                      Quote: Yeraz
                      I think I will have fewer problems. Still, I’m a citizen of the Russian Federation, but I also want to go to Iran. So to learn about the life of the Azerbaijanis there. Here I sit and think who to go first to have less problems)


                      Well, it would be more logical to first go to Iran ... because they will not be allowed to enter Iran with a stamp of Israel in their passport ...
                      or it will turn out like in a joke:
                      -Izya !!! There Jews are beaten!
                      -And I'm on the Russian passport!
                      -Yes not according to the passport - they beat in the face)
                3. -4
                  21 May 2016 23: 56
                  "But I am drawn to Israel ... I really want to visit Jerusalem. Problem" - PODLIZ read! INDEPENDENT user.
                  1. 0
                    22 May 2016 00: 02
                    Quote: dr.star75
                    "But I am drawn to Israel ... I really want to visit Jerusalem. Problem" - PODLIZ read! INDEPENDENT user.


                    I agree ... from the outside it seems like a lick ... but believe me - I wanted to go to Israel before the appearance of this site. I always sympathized with this people.
                    And how independent I am ... visit my profile ... read.
                    1. -1
                      22 May 2016 00: 08
                      "from the outside it seems like sucking up" - YES, very strong. As far as I know, we have a visa-free agreement with Israel. Those. you buy a ticket to Tel Aviv, arrive, print, and that's it. What's the dream?
                      1. +1
                        22 May 2016 00: 18
                        Quote: dr.star75
                        "from the outside it seems like sucking up" - YES, very strong. As far as I know, we have a visa-free agreement with Israel. Those. you buy a ticket to Tel Aviv, arrive, print, and that's it. What's the dream?


                        We have it in Russia, as I understand it ... and I am a citizen of Azerbaijan and live in Azerbaijan. And the flag next to the nickname - the site can not determine my location wink
                      2. -1
                        22 May 2016 00: 36
                        “I understand it in Russia ..” - yes, here in Russia. Why the hell did you separate from Russia? Did you think it would be better? And the result?
                      3. +3
                        22 May 2016 01: 04
                        Quote: dr.star75
                        “I understand it in Russia ..” - yes, here in Russia. Why the hell did you separate from Russia? Did you think it would be better? And the result?


                        We didn’t separate ... 95% of the population during the referendum voted in favor of preserving the USSR. This is the highest percentage of all. Our people wanted to continue to live together.

                        But many ... especially Armenia (your most "ardent and devoted ally") voted for secession from the USSR. 95% of voters took part in the referendum ... 99% voted for secession.
                      4. 0
                        22 May 2016 01: 22
                        We didn’t separate ... 95% of the population during the referendum voted in favor of preserving the USSR. This is the highest percentage of all. Our people wanted to continue to live together.

                        Since when has the people of Azerbaijan been deciding something. They wrote 95% to lick Gorbachev and so that the Soviet special forces would continue, together with your riot police, to carry out the "ring" operation to expel the Armenians from Artsakh.
                        But many ... especially Armenia (your most "ardent and devoted ally") voted for secession from the USSR. 95% of voters took part in the referendum ... 99% voted for secession.

                        And here is the reason, the same operation "ring"
                        And at the same time you are lying that the Russians fought for the Armenians against you.
            3. -3
              21 May 2016 23: 58
              having the Skuda and Iskander in their possession and threatening to strike at Baku with an atomic bomb, it is quite natural that ballistic missiles are needed at least to deter schizophrenics.
              1. +3
                22 May 2016 02: 42
                threatening to hit Baku with an atomic bomb it’s quite natural that ballistic missiles are needed at least to deter schizophrenics

                The atomic bomb?))) Yes, even say that in Lake Sevan an atomic submarine floats.
                And who after this is schizophrenic.
                1. +1
                  22 May 2016 02: 45
                  Quote: Fhvty
                  The atomic bomb?))) Yes, even say that in Lake Sevan an atomic submarine floats.


                  Based on Ararat ....
              2. +7
                22 May 2016 07: 00
                Quote: uran
                having the Scuda and Iskander

                Well, let's go to the studio, dear, where did Iskander come from in Azerbaijan?
                1. +7
                  22 May 2016 09: 50
                  Quote: vovanpain

                  Quote: uran

                  Well, ka minuser, poorly present the facts in the studio negative Here you can put your minuses to me, you yourself know where laughing Just for fun. fellow
      7. +3
        21 May 2016 18: 15
        And from which side of Gyumri? Azerbaijan is not in conflict with Russia, everything is fine with us in Baku
    2. Hon
      +1
      21 May 2016 11: 37
      Actually, the war in Karabakh began when the Union still existed.
      1. +1
        21 May 2016 17: 51
        Actually, the war in Karabakh began when the Union still existed,
        to remind you who was at the head of the UNION, a man who NEVER KNEW.
    3. +3
      21 May 2016 12: 17
      Yeah! And for this it was necessary to destroy the Union?


      That is exactly the "Union of indestructible republics of free" .... As soon as there is a hint in the binding of the territory to the nation, expect trouble. And we are all on a rake, but on a rake. Tataria, Mordovia, Chechnya. Now the Crimean Tatars "cut off" a personal piece of nadot. We must move gently and smoothly to Kazan, Grozny, and others. areas of. And persisting in a tambourine, you need to think about the future.
      1. -1
        21 May 2016 20: 29
        Quote: dauria
        It is necessary to smoothly and smoothly move to the Kazan, Grozny and other areas. And persisting in a tambourine, you need to think about the future.

        But what is it, to choose the tsar, to distribute the land to the landlords, to open parish schools, Orthodoxy, autocracy, nationality. Well, and then, of course, pogroms, pogroms, and again pogroms. Inorodtsev. Nekhristey. .Russian after all is undoubtedly higher in development than the Tatars, Mordovians, Chechens.
        And all the problems will be resolved at once. And only two troubles will remain anyway. Although, perhaps, they will still be able to cope with the roads.
    4. 0
      21 May 2016 12: 18
      Quote: NordUral
      Yeah! And for this it was necessary to destroy the Union? Like everything else that is happening throughout the former great country.


      It was for this, and all other things, that the Anglo-Saxons needed to destroy the Union. Now they are sitting, rubbing their sweaty little hands. Watching us butting each other. There were not enough brains, or maybe Fe in some organs of the then leadership of the USSR.
    5. 0
      21 May 2016 12: 23
      As a result of the counter-revolution of 1985 ... 1991, the USSR and the construction of communism became an instrument for the development of the territories of Siberia and Asia, industrialization of the backward countries of Asia and Africa due to over-exploitation, mainly of the Russian people, globalization and initial capitalist accumulation. After the collapse and development of the territories of the British Empire, the USSR became unnecessary.
    6. +1
      21 May 2016 18: 14
      It’s for sure, it’s scary to look at what is happening in Ukraine, Tajikistan, at the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan that are close to us
    7. -2
      21 May 2016 21: 13
      It seems that Armenia already has "Point U".
      Today on NTV showed "Saakashvili without a tie." Just hair on end. belay The business of transplanting human organs from detained Georgians and jailbrokers from the ATO to Europe, which also includes Erdogan’s son and the schizoid from the Washington Senate, McCain. Those with whom Aliyev the Younger is with and why rockets become obvious to him.
    8. 0
      22 May 2016 16: 57
      NordUral (3) RU Yesterday, 11:12
      Yeah! And for this it was necessary to destroy the Union? Like everything else that is happening throughout the former great country.
      That’s for the sake of THIS and destroyed the Union, someone consciously and someone in their meager stupidity. As it’s fashionable to say now, this is a business, nothing personal.
  2. +10
    21 May 2016 11: 14
    Can you strike anywhere, but just in return? They will divide Azerbaijan as a result into three between Russia, Armenia and Iran! They will achieve historical justice ......
    1. -7
      21 May 2016 11: 24
      Quote: fregina1
      Can you strike anywhere, but just in return? They will divide Azerbaijan as a result into three between Russia, Armenia and Iran! They will achieve historical justice ......

      I agree. But I'm sorry, I was the first to stand!
      In fact, there will be nothing to share, only on paper, for future generations. The radioactive desert. Khachiki unfortunately do not understand at whose table they sat. Here they play not for big. Globally.
      1. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. vex
          +5
          21 May 2016 21: 39
          Quote: Res_Ullus
          Many Muslims consider the adoption of Orthodoxy by Armenians as a betrayal

          Can I talk in more detail? Armenians adopted Christianity in the first century, and as a state in 301, before the Roman Empire and other countries. What kind of Muslims could they betray if Islam appeared only in the XNUMXth century?
        2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +4
    21 May 2016 11: 14
    Hoping for help from Turkey and the United States. It is time to return their bosom of RUSSIA and change the entire government. soldier
    1. +3
      21 May 2016 11: 25
      Quote: cerbuk6155
      Hoping for help from Turkey and the United States.

      Turkey understood. But the USA here is in what LOOK ?? What the USA supported Baku. The Armenian lobby is strong in Washington. The largest embassy in the world with the USA is also 1.5 thousand people in Yerevan.
      Until recently, the United States was the only country in the world that officially allocated money to the separatist regime in Karabakh.
      It sells nothing to Azerbaijan. It only prepared the special forces of the Azerbaijani Navy and sold radars for installation in the Caspian Sea to control the fields and most likely Iran.
      These Armenians can fully hope for US help.
      Azerbaijan only to Turkey with Pakistan and other Muslim countries.
      1. +3
        21 May 2016 14: 04
        I noticed ... how strikingly affects the message of the article on the attitude of commentators to one side or another. Impartiality and objectivity break right down.
        Well, what can we expect from people who hated the whole Georgian people because of one shit, whose name is Saakashvili. And people who defend the interests of Armenia with foam because they are on paper Armenia is an ally of Russia ... Armenians are a friendly people for Russians ... but not the Yerevan and overseas Armenians. If you were comrades ... a little calmer and more attentive ... you would have noticed how the Armenians looked west sideways from time to time, secretly.
        1. 0
          21 May 2016 14: 24
          What a primitive strategy.
          Probably sit and think: "I will tell the Russian that the Armenian is also a friend of the French, let the Russian take offense at him. And then I will tell the Armenian that the Russian does not even respect him at all, and then the Armenian will be offended by the Russian ..."
          Only here is your strategy, too vile, already disgusting.
          1. +1
            21 May 2016 14: 31
            Quote: Fhvty
            What a primitive strategy.
            Probably sit and think: "I will tell the Russian that the Armenian is also a friend of the French, let the Russian take offense at him. And then I will tell the Armenian that the Russian does not even respect him at all, and then the Armenian will be offended by the Russian ..."
            Only here is your strategy, too vile, already disgusting.


            I have good teachers in the form of you. This is your tactic ... comrades Armenians. Kurds, Lezgin, Talyshes to incite and add fuel, do not you teach? We have an international where everyone lives together, we are vulnerable to such mutilators ... and you will not have such interethnic problems ... in Armenia, you have to try and find someone else besides Armenians.
            1. 0
              21 May 2016 21: 42
              Multiculturalism began when Armenians were slaughtered and deported and then became the most tolerant people in the world.
              1. -1
                21 May 2016 21: 51
                Quote: Waha
                Multiculturalism began when Armenians were slaughtered and deported and then became the most tolerant people in the world.

                The same Azeri Chingachguk, as their Yerevan and Dashnak "kollegs" are, were slaughtered and deported Armenians. There are enough Gavnyuk everywhere. Are you by any chance the last one?
                1. 0
                  21 May 2016 23: 50
                  That is why the Russian Federation, and earlier the USSR, and even earlier, the Russian Empire became the largest state on the planet! We have transformed all your petty possessive interests into national interests. So Russia was moving forward!
        2. Dam
          +4
          21 May 2016 18: 06
          I note that if Sobakoshvili was alone, he would not be able to do what he did. He was supported by most Georgians. And as to who is more ally, who is less ally, let’s look at hour C.
    2. +2
      21 May 2016 12: 15
      And what are they, in fact, going to return?
      After all, they did not go anywhere ... just as they "captured" virtually all the markets in Russia back in the 90s, they are still trading - it is in their blood! And they are bad fighters - there are a lot of show-offs, but there is no spirit!
      It would be more correct not to return, but to expel for any, even not significant, offense! Moreover, not only Azerbaijanis, but all former brothers in the union "- can you imagine how calm it would be on our streets ?!
      But this is from the realm of fantasy - how will cops and officials "live" then if all the "breadwinners" are dispersed ?!
      1. 0
        21 May 2016 14: 06
        Quote: kepmor
        And what are they, in fact, going to return?
        After all, they did not go anywhere ... just as they "captured" virtually all the markets in Russia back in the 90s, they are still trading - it is in their blood! And they are bad fighters - there are a lot of show-offs, but there is no spirit!
        It would be more correct not to return, but to expel for any, even not significant, offense! Moreover, not only Azerbaijanis, but all former brothers in the union "- can you imagine how calm it would be on our streets ?!
        But this is from the realm of fantasy - how will cops and officials "live" then if all the "breadwinners" are dispersed ?!

        And I should start comparing the "color of the nation" of Russia which are from the hinterland? The majority of Azerbaijanis in Russia are from our hinterland (regions in our opinion)
        1. +1
          21 May 2016 14: 13
          Get started, your right!
          Only the "color of the nation" is the citizens of the Russian Federation, and this is a completely different story ...
          1. +2
            21 May 2016 14: 39
            Quote: kepmor
            Only the "color of the nation" is the citizens of the Russian Federation, and this is a completely different story ...

            Will their "color" change from citizenship? You did not talk about citizenship ... I think your attitude towards Azerbaijanis, regardless of their citizenship, will not differ.
  4. +4
    21 May 2016 11: 14
    If a gun hangs on the wall, it will certainly shoot, as the folk wisdom says, this is not good.
  5. +5
    21 May 2016 11: 18
    Tactical missiles 500 km? I don’t even want to look into the atlas. Up to Armenia and 200 is enough. And to you, for all sorts of errors, it will fall north, back and forth .. Well, it’s understandable, the Azerbaijanis shot. What to do? To understand and to forgive. I agree. Posthumously.
    Turks are weird, Americans are dealt cards.
  6. 0
    21 May 2016 11: 19
    Interestingly, where would they buy such rockets? Would they really turn to Moscow? Money doesn’t smell.
    1. +2
      21 May 2016 11: 26
      I’m also wondering who is selling us here? recourse
      1. 0
        21 May 2016 13: 09
        The Chinese can sell, not the OTRK, but the WS 2D MLRS with a firing range of 400 kilometers.
    2. +5
      21 May 2016 11: 31
      To Turkey for example. They have OTRK Idirim, together with Pakistan.
      1. 0
        22 May 2016 10: 20
        Our "Laura" 600 mm, apparently, did not dare to sell to Azerbaijan.
        Like, mini-"Point-U".
        In short, it’s easier, it flies further, it’s more accurate, it brings 500 kg.
        1. 0
          22 May 2016 11: 20
          Quote: voyaka uh
          Our "Laura" 600 mm, apparently, did not dare to sell to Azerbaijan.
          Like, mini-"Point-U".
          In short, it’s easier, it flies further, it’s more accurate, it brings 500 kg.

          Alexey, and thanks for that.
    3. +1
      21 May 2016 11: 31
      Quote: Evgeniy667b
      Interestingly, where would they buy such rockets? Would they really turn to Moscow? Money doesn’t smell.

      I don’t think that Russia will sell it. How many years have it asked the fighters to sell it does not sell.
      And who can sell. Azerbaijan has long been rumored that negotiations are underway with Pakistan.
      In fact, no one else will sell.
      And Turkey so far produces rockets with a range of 200-300 km.

      Yerevan is already covered by other systems. They probably want to fire as deep as possible.
      1. +3
        21 May 2016 11: 54
        Again, in the comments on the article about Azerbaijan, you cannot read anything but banter. And it is those who do not know the region from the word ABSOLUTELY write! Again there is talk about tomatoes. What characterizes the level of thinking of the authors of these pearls The commander mentioned Yerevan in response to those Armenian generals who constantly repeat and frighten with a blow to Baku. Of course, they will not write about this on the site. Any country has the right to defend its territories and restore its territorial integrity. And any banter and ridicule is inappropriate here. As for the possibility of acquisition, the missiles are produced in addition to Russia and other countries. Israel, Iran, China, the same Pakistan, why not? Sold for a sweet soul. The picture shows a Pakistani surface-to-surface missile.
        1. +3
          21 May 2016 12: 39
          On the MAZ-547 chassis from "Pioneer". (Cut by our licks in 1986-90)
        2. +8
          21 May 2016 12: 41
          Quote: xetai9977
          Again, in the comments on the article about Azerbaijan, you can’t read anything except banter

          And who jokes that respected, request
          Quote: xetai9977
          Talk again about tomatoes.

          It would be better if you actually threw tomatoes and cloves. But not grenades and shells, I’ll repeat it specially for you, nobody in the world fucks need your showdown, except Turkey
          Quote: xetai9977
          Commander mentioned Yerevan

          It would be better if he mentioned this in negotiations with the commander of Armenia. Armenia is still a member of the CSTO, Russia, too, so the consequences are not predictable, besides, the Russian base in Gyumri wouldn’t work like the Georgians. Do you need this? Does Russia need this? hi
          1. +5
            21 May 2016 12: 49
            Those who, apart from tomatoes, can’t come up with anything in the comments flock. And as for the fact that Armenia is a member of the CSTO, proceeding from this, is it entitled to threaten other countries with striking at their capitals and behave aggressively?
            1. +1
              21 May 2016 13: 56
              Armenia and NKR do not threaten you. The Armenians live on their land and do not touch anyone, and they do not know you and do not want to know. And you constantly, climb, climb ... As if to you 1994. few.
              What do you want? There is oil, there is gas, the sea is, there is Eurovision ... live quietly for yourself.
              No, here you have to climb again, scoop up again, and then run, scream to the whole world about the evil Armenians who beat you again.
              1. +4
                21 May 2016 14: 24
                Quote: Fhvty
                And you constantly, climb, climb ...

                Not ... well, damn fellows ... occupied our territories, threw out 1 000 000 of the population from there and are still surprised that they are climbing to them.
                Here are the pussies white ...
                1. +4
                  21 May 2016 14: 52
                  Quote: Fhvty
                  Armenia and NKR do not threaten you. The Armenians live on their land and do not touch anyone, and they do not know you and do not want to know. And you constantly, climb, climb ...


                  You are cunning ... Armenia can strike at the Mingachevir ENEA, at oil fields and oil and gas pipelines, but we are not ... Armenia is in the Collective Security Treaty Organization ... I already see what you will do if the war in Karabakh does not benefit you ...Armenia will simply transfer air defense and long-range weapons to the territory of Armenia. And it will strike free of charge ...because if we try to eliminate this threat, we will have to strike at the territory of Armenia ...and immediately the cunning plan of Armenia should come into effect. The CSTO treaty will come into force and Russia will be forced to invade Azerbaijan.

                  Now comrades ... do you understand how these "ancient and great" survived to this day ???

                  And do not dare to lie so hypocritically that Armenia is not hiding behind the back of the Russian Army.
                  1. +2
                    21 May 2016 17: 18
                    And do not dare to lie so hypocritically that Armenia is not hiding behind the back of the Russian Army.

                    Well, so far, Russia has covered your ass 2 times. First, in 1994, when they stopped us in front of Kirovabad, and now, when the Armenians went on the counterattack.
                    1. +1
                      21 May 2016 17: 38
                      Quote: Fhvty
                      And do not dare to lie so hypocritically that Armenia is not hiding behind the back of the Russian Army.

                      Well, so far, Russia has covered your ass 2 times. First, in 1994, when they stopped us in front of Kirovabad, and now, when the Armenians went on the counterattack.

                      Ahhh ... and now Russia is a bad ally ... progressing comrades ...
                      As for the counterattack ... do you specify in which direction it should have gone? By chance not to the West towards Yerevan?

                      I have already submitted a summary of the Armenian radio ...
                      - Valiant Armenian fighters went on the counterattack with the goal of liberating our original Mugan plain.
                      Two days later - Valorous Armenian fighters completed their combat mission. The battles are now being fought for the liberation of Kirovobad and Shushi.
                      In a week ...- In the course of a successful and brilliant and the world's best large-scale offensive on all fronts, the great Armenian army fights on the outskirts of Yerevan ... the victory will be ours !!! Haiastan Forever!
                      1. -2
                        21 May 2016 18: 09
                        Ahhh ... and now Russia is a bad ally ... progressing comrades ...

                        And I’ll directly say that the ally from Russia is so-so. Russia will always do as it benefits itself. Yes, however, and any other great country. Let's face it. If it would be beneficial for Russia to merge Armenia, it would do it; if it would be advantageous to smuggle Azerbaijan, it would do it. So far, it is beneficial for Russia so that everything remains as it is. So everything will remain as it is.
                  2. -2
                    21 May 2016 17: 26
                    and immediately the cunning plan of Armenia will come into effect.

                    And why is this plan tricky? A normal plan for yourself.
                    Well, another question is that you can’t understand how the Armenians don’t have any significance where you will strike. For us, this is all Armenia. This is one. I mean, how people actually perceive this.
                    And what is formal, there is NKR here, RA, something someone recognizes or does not recognize ... This is the tenth question.
                    1. 0
                      21 May 2016 17: 40
                      Quote: Fhvty
                      and immediately the cunning plan of Armenia will come into effect.

                      Well, another question is that you can’t understand how the Armenians don’t have any significance where you will strike. For us, this is all Armenia. This is one. I mean, how people actually perceive this.
                      And what is formal, there is NKR here, RA, something someone recognizes or does not recognize ... This is the tenth question.

                      The people then perceive ... but there is no politics.

                      Quote: Fhvty
                      And why is this plan tricky? A normal plan for yourself.

                      I think the Russian soldier won’t think so ...
                2. -1
                  21 May 2016 16: 50
                  Not ... well, damn fellows ... occupied our territories, threw out 1 000 000 of the population from there and are still surprised that they are climbing to them.
                  Here are the pussies white ...

                  Not occupied but returned theirs. Returned once and for all. Forever and ever. And come to terms with this already.
                  And in the NKR before the war, there were only 15–20 thousand Azeris, where did a million come from?
                  1. +1
                    21 May 2016 17: 11
                    Quote: Fhvty
                    Not ... well, damn fellows ... occupied our territories, threw out 1 000 000 of the population from there and are still surprised that they are climbing to them.
                    Here are the pussies white ...

                    Not occupied but returned theirs. Returned once and for all. Forever and ever. And come to terms with this already.
                    And in the NKR before the war, there were only 15–20 thousand Azeris, where did a million come from?


                    You answered the comment easier) And now answer the one that is slightly lower ...
                  2. +2
                    22 May 2016 00: 25
                    Returned your ?? Your in India is located can you return to your historical homeland?
                    Thanks to the Russians you were resettled in the Caucasus, sit and pray to your masters and do not reproach them with anything.
                    1. -1
                      22 May 2016 01: 47
                      So, did the Armenians come from India? You can’t decide in any way from the Balkans, then from Iran, or from India. Pseudo people with the name stolen from Iran assigned from the light hand of Stalin. And the Armenians, as they were Armenians, have remained for thousands of years, and you God knows what you will be called in a hundred years.
                3. -1
                  21 May 2016 22: 19
                  Shame on these Armenians at first they began to be cut, then deported, and they took and began to confront Great Azerbaijan and announced about secession in the territory where there were an absolute majority. You have not thrown out of shame and conscience from a purely peaceful and secular way from the country, but they have aggressively prevented this.
            2. +1
              21 May 2016 15: 10
              Quote: xetai9977
              Those who, apart from tomatoes, can’t come up with anything in the comments flock. And as for the fact that Armenia is a member of the CSTO, proceeding from this, is it entitled to threaten other countries with striking at their capitals and behave aggressively?

              Listen, dear. Everything was quiet, peaceful, you have your own pain, the Armenians have their own. And suddenly, Syria (3 years, by the way). But as we pinched the tail of Erdogan, your spring exacerbation began. Naturally this is interconnected. To hell with your beautiful capital who needs a hundred years. You do not disturb ours, and you will live beautifully and happily for a thousand years. I promise.
              1. +1
                21 May 2016 21: 07
                Listen, don’t confuse God's gift with scrambled eggs. If you firmly decided to believe in something, then do not interfere, your problems. And someone needs your fucking capital. Do not seek the lexicon. What is the answer, so hello
            3. +9
              21 May 2016 17: 54
              Quote: xetai9977
              Those who, apart from tomatoes, can’t come up with anything in the comments flock.

              Dear Rauf, let's start by saying that we forget about tomatoes on the Russian markets, both Azerbaijanis and Armenians get along well, at least get a bit of a crunch, for the gifted I repeat: -You better throw tomatoes around. I don’t have any sympathy or antipathy for you I don’t feel either to you or to the Armenians. I served with both Azerbaijanis and Armenians, everything happened and they fought and put up, but I don’t really have to do any sorting and tomatoes on the drum, but this concerns Russia. Look at my comment in Read carefully and think about it, no matter what the circumstances, no matter how anyone wants to BUT, first of all, RUSSIA IS SUCH RIGHTS OR NO. BUT IT ALWAYS FULFILLED ITS OBLIGATIONS. I did not accidentally raise the question of the CSTO and Gyumri, as if you I would like the Turks and Pakistanis not to want it, but we, Russia, will have to intervene, as on 08.08.08, thank God and Allah the negotiations were negotiated in April 2016, but you must admit, Russia, if at least one of your shells falls on Yerevan or Gyumri or rocket, buy at least with how much you want them, but you will agree that Russia’s opportunities are still greater, that Azerbaijan and Armenia have combined, but Russia is FORCED to intervene. And it will be bad for everyone and Russia, including the 3rd World War, and you say tomatoes. hi
              1. +4
                21 May 2016 21: 00
                Vladimir, I don’t understand what you mean? Tomatoes aside, and good. So there is progress))))). As for Gyumri, do you really think that someone is thinking of shelling the Russian base? In my opinion, there are no such suicides. Karabakh is OUR territory, recognized for us by ALL the states of the world, including Russia, to the great regret of some clever people sitting here. We are free to hit it when we want, and no one here is a decree to us. And if they hit us from the territory of Armenia, then there will be an adequate response. Membership is somewhere not the reason for aggressive behavior and provocative activities. You'd better bring your "ally" back if you really want peace.
          2. +2
            21 May 2016 13: 11
            Today, Armenia is in the CSTO, and tomorrow it is no longer.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. +2
          21 May 2016 14: 04
          Everything, as always, was written correctly by Rauf Mellim.
        5. Dam
          +1
          21 May 2016 18: 10
          So, after all, the Armenians will receive them from Russia in a mirror. Does Azeybarjan need this? I do not know. It would be easier for Mr. Aliyev not to try to sit on a chair with one leg. And do not try to improve your ratings with a small victorious war
          1. 0
            21 May 2016 21: 13
            Will they get it again for free?))) Well, continue.
    4. 0
      21 May 2016 13: 44
      Quote: Evgeniy667b
      Interestingly, where would they buy such rockets? Would they really turn to Moscow? Money doesn’t smell.

      Alas dear. While no one sees, they may not smell. And when the question is under control ...
  7. PPD
    +7
    21 May 2016 11: 19
    But he doesn’t need nuclear weapons ?! negative
    PS I looked at his photo awards, as if Stalingrad with the Kursk Bulge had passed. am
    All this is not serious.
    1. +6
      21 May 2016 11: 41
      They have it in their blood, they love tzatska brilliant. And in the mouth of any Azerbaijani, there is a gold reserve of Zimbabwe.
      1. +6
        21 May 2016 12: 03
        Really? Imagine I do not have a single golden tooth. And I have 1600 books at home, from Plutarch to world encyclopedias. Remove foreign objects from the eyes, stubnik
        1. -3
          21 May 2016 14: 06
          Do you want to attach a photo of your bookshelves and tooth cavity?
          With Plutarch, of course!)))
          By the way, my aunt in Baku had exactly 1600 books at home, with Plutarch. So they left everything, fled.
          Well ... Where are the books from ?!
          1. +1
            21 May 2016 21: 19
            Stupid! The level of pottery in the bathroom.
          2. +2
            22 May 2016 00: 31
            wassat the true Armenian nature of stealing someone else’s can list which books remained in Baku written by ancient Armenian writers like Pushkiyan, Gogolyan like to appropriate someone else’s for yourself and invent Armenian pseudo roots of all great people laughing
      2. +3
        21 May 2016 12: 20
        Quote: Chisain
        And in the mouth of any Azerbaijani, is the gold reserve of Zimbabwe.

        Really ??? maybe a couple of watermelon points in front of the house I have ?? You also check how you have a bear with a balalaika, if of course you get out of a state of drunkenness)))

        these thinking of some, how they amuse))
        1. +5
          21 May 2016 12: 35
          C'mon, for 4 (four) years of work in the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, I had to talk with Azerbaijanis many times, the impression is that all the gold of Siberia is in their teeth. And I do not drink or smoke.
          1. +2
            21 May 2016 12: 45
            "Come on"....
            And I imagine saw Russians usually drunk. But I do not say that all Russians are completely drunkards! In all nations there are smart and cultural, and not so ... Let's respect each other, and not hang labels. Adults, but behave like ..
          2. 0
            21 May 2016 15: 33
            Quote: Chisain
            And I don’t drink or smoke.

            Probably found something better ... then I’ll mess up your comments from time to time somehow .... funny ...
            1. -2
              21 May 2016 17: 03
              And I don’t drink or smoke.

              Typically, the continuation is:
              ... and I don’t walk with girls)))
      3. -1
        21 May 2016 15: 20
        Quote: Chisain
        They have it in their blood, they love tzatska brilliant. And in the mouth of any Azerbaijani, there is a gold reserve of Zimbabwe.

        Well, this is more an economic-stomatological issue. Zimbabwe's gold reserve? Everything is in the USA, as a result - 0. Swell - oh bad water, plain oil ...
    2. +1
      21 May 2016 12: 07
      Yes, he doesn’t have any awards there.
  8. +3
    21 May 2016 11: 22
    Armenia! And if you were part of Russia, then no one would blather for striking Yerevan! And indeed many questions, if not all would have been removed, all of them would be well and calm! I have not heard that anyone would threaten from abroad capitals, Bashkiria, Tatarstan, Dagestan, Chechnya, the Jewish Autonomous Region, and others. The USSR and the Russian Empire are an example of this!
    1. +12
      21 May 2016 11: 39
      [quote = Dmitry Potapov] Armenia! And if you are part of Russia


      Judging by the number of Armenians in Russia, they are already in the composition ..
      1. 0
        21 May 2016 14: 07
        here, and in which case you can also harness for them: because of the geography of the line, who is in allies, and in some regions from nice and kind Armenian faces, it’s already good at heart: and it pleases no more than the Central Asian emigrant savagery without soap in. .. climb the bath
        1. vex
          +2
          21 May 2016 21: 54
          Quote: vanavate
          from lovely and kind Armenian faces it’s already good at heart

          And on the avatar you have an Armenian)) google who is Lavrov by nationality.
          1. -1
            22 May 2016 09: 37
            another wise guy: googled himself what Sergey Viktorovich said on this occasion, and I'm tired of explaining the difference between a Soviet person, a brilliant minister and hired traders with peculiar ideas and decency and honesty
  9. +2
    21 May 2016 11: 27
    We can clean the Russian storage base, having prechipped it, so that they only fly to Turkey. We’ll even make a discount. A big one. Yes
  10. +6
    21 May 2016 11: 34
    According to him, “for reliable defense capability, Azerbaijan should acquire tactical missiles with a radius of 200, 300 and 500 kilometers”.
    And what is so modest? Why not with a radius of 2000; 3000 and 5000 km and nuclear warheads to them.
    “We can deliver pinpoint strikes on any object of the enemy. If the Supreme Commander orders, we can strike at Yerevan ",
    added on.
    So they would directly say that they want to destroy Armenia, so that Erdogan would not be required to apologize for the Armenian genocide in 1915. There are no Armenians, there is no problem. And Erdogan is satisfied.
    1. 0
      21 May 2016 11: 53
      This is a clear attempt to create the Azerbaijan empire from sea to sea. Erdogan should beware of competitors. laughing
      1. 0
        21 May 2016 12: 07
        They had an empire, Sevid, then the Turks destroyed it. But Armenians are still "bad" laughing
        1. 0
          21 May 2016 12: 15
          [quote = MJohn] They had an empire, Sevide, then the Turks destroyed it.

          "Why was I so angry before? Because I didn't have a velisaped!" laughing
        2. -3
          21 May 2016 22: 46
          They had an empire, Sevid, then the Turks destroyed it. But the Armenians are still "bad" laughing

          It was an empire, but not with them, but with the Persians. But they have not yet decided whether they are Turks, or Persians, or Zak. Tatars, or Albanians. In general, when it’s profitable, they call themselves that. And they poke around the corners. Nizami was appropriated from the Persians, and everything was taken away from the Armenians. They even made cross-stones.
      2. 0
        21 May 2016 12: 19
        "This is a clear attempt to create an Azerbaijani empire from sea to sea" -
        You have confused addresses. Our aggressive neighbors want to create a "Great Armenia" covering the whole of Syria, half of Israel, half of Turkey, half of Iran, and up to the Rostov region of Russia. They even made maps that have been circulating around Yerevan since the late 70s. We and our internationally recognized territories (by the way, and Russia, to your chagrin) are enough
        1. -1
          21 May 2016 12: 26
          We started for health, and finished for peace. Specially weaving the Rostov region and trying to set up the Russians.
        2. +4
          21 May 2016 12: 34
          Quote: xetai9977
          You have confused addresses. Our aggressive neighbors want to create "Great Armenia", covering the whole of Syria, half of Israel, half of Turkey, half of Iran, and up to the Rostov region of Russia. They even made maps that have been circulating around Yerevan since the late 70s. We and our internationally recognized territories (by the way, and Russia, to your chagrin) are enough


          I don’t know about Israel, Turkey and Iran, but in the Rostov region I confirm that there are already mini-emperors.
      3. +5
        21 May 2016 12: 26
        Quote: 3officer
        This is a clear attempt to create an Azerbaijan empire from sea to sea.

        It is important for Azerbaijan to return the territories occupied by Armenia. Nobody noticed any other * imperial * ambitions with him.
        1. +7
          21 May 2016 12: 40
          Quote: atalef
          It is important for Azerbaijan to return the territories occupied by Armenia. Nobody noticed any other * imperial * ambitions with him.

          Then return Syria to the Golan Heights request
          1. +3
            21 May 2016 15: 28
            Quote: MJohn
            Quote: atalef
            It is important for Azerbaijan to return the territories occupied by Armenia. Nobody noticed any other * imperial * ambitions with him.
            Then return Syria to the Golan Heights

            ?? fool where is the logic ... return Kaliningrad and Alaska and generally revise the borders starting from the 4th e.d.
          2. -1
            21 May 2016 22: 54
            Quote: MJohn
            Then return Syria to the Golan Heights

            Jews are not required to return the Golan Heights ... this is a fair trophy for the attempt of the Arabs to throw the Jews into the sea together.
            1. -2
              21 May 2016 23: 17
              Jews are not required to return the Golan Heights ... this is a fair trophy for the attempt of the Arabs to throw the Jews into the sea together.

              Jews (Armenians) are not obliged to return the Golan Heights (areas around Artsakh) ... this is a fair trophy for the attempt of Arabs (Azeri) to throw Jews all over the sea together (to cut out Artsakh Armenians).
              1. +2
                22 May 2016 00: 11
                Quote: Fhvty
                Jews (Armenians) are not obliged to return the Golan Heights (areas around Artsakh) ... this is a fair trophy for the attempt of Arabs (Azeri) to throw Jews all over the sea together (to cut out Artsakh Armenians).


                Handsome ... I knew that someone would write like that ... but so professionally ...

                Here is just one flaw ... you started the war ... we made no attempt to invade Armenia.
                1. -1
                  22 May 2016 01: 31
                  we made no attempt to invade Armenia.

                  You attempted to invade NKR.
                  1. +1
                    22 May 2016 02: 28
                    Quote: Fhvty
                    You attempted to invade NKR.

                    What kind of NKR? ... what is this? Is this a village? Or a mountain? ... Armenians released a new brand of cognac?

                    Nobody in the world recognizes the NKR.
                    For example, Pakistan does not even consider Armenia itself as a state at the official level.
        2. vex
          0
          21 May 2016 22: 04
          Fools, they are already claiming that Armenia was created by the Russians in the "Azerbaijani territories", and after the possible return of Karabakh, nothing will stop their breakthrough to brotherly Turkey. For you, everything that is hostile to Russia and Iran, even genocidal, terrorist hordes, is like a balm for your worthless soul.
        3. -2
          21 May 2016 22: 32
          Yes, and the Iranian province of South Azerbaijan and Derbent, if possible, and Erivan with Zangezur and then look at the appetite.
  11. +4
    21 May 2016 12: 10
    Missiles will not be saved if the soldiers are cowardly. And the past war showed that the Armenians are soldiers, and the Baku-merchants are cherry plum ...
    1. 0
      21 May 2016 12: 28
      . "And the last war showed that the Armenians are warriors" ....
      What warriors they are, the ARMENIAN website will answer you, http: //www.armenianreport.com/pubs/130877/.
      Read, learn a lot about yourself. I’m not doing any agitation here. I post today's article from the Internet resource of your ally.
      1. +5
        21 May 2016 12: 36
        Everyone knows that as part of the information war, intelligence agencies on both sides created fake sites for misinformation and propaganda.
      2. +3
        21 May 2016 15: 04
        Quote: xetai9977
        . "And the last war showed that the Armenians are warriors" ....
        What warriors they are, the ARMENIAN website will answer you, http: //www.armenianreport.com/pubs/130877/.
        Read, learn a lot about yourself. I’m not doing any agitation here. I post today's article from the Internet resource of your ally.

        Rauf, your compatriot under the nickname Knizhnik very wisely remarked that articles are constantly appearing on the site with the help of which they try to add fuel to the fire and cause even greater hatred between our peoples. He wisely called for restricting comments on such articles, if it is not possible to completely ignore them. By pouring mud on each other, we will not achieve anything.
        1. +3
          21 May 2016 15: 43
          Oil on the fire, pouring mud on each other? This is the lot of most of the "debating" here. What I don't like most is not how Armenians or Azerbaijanis roll barrels on top of each other ... but with what delight the outside "observers" are watching this and how exactly they add fuel to the fire ... "pseudo-patriots", comrades ".. .the allies only the army and the navy "... sometimes they let go of such Nazi and" Aryan "statements towards Armenians, Azerbaijanis, Ukrainians, Georgians and other" subhumans "judging by the comments ...
          1. The comment was deleted.
            1. The comment was deleted.
              1. The comment was deleted.
                1. +2
                  22 May 2016 00: 57
                  Quote: razmik72
                  You are doing this business, selling weapons to one side of the conflict, then to the other, and also, it’s generally sur, you occupy the post of co-chair in the settlement of the Karabakh conflict.

                  Actually, you want the Russian Federation to give you weapons for beautiful Armenian shno..bel? Believe me, Azeri will find where to buy and besides the Russian Federation, but where will you get the money to buy weapons?
                  Say thank you that we all harnessed for you. To take Armenia to the CSTO and arrange your base is Putin’s biggest mistake.
                  1. +1
                    22 May 2016 01: 13
                    You didn’t rely on those ... you chose Armenia ... 99% of voters voted for secession from the USSR. This would be an indicator of the unreliability of Armenia as an ally of Russia. Azerbaijan, on the contrary ... was all for preserving the USSR - 95%. And Azerbaijan left the Collective Security Treaty Organization (yes ... it was part of the Collective Security Treaty Organization for six years), because of Russia's support for Armenia. According to the fact and the international law of the occupier. Because of this, Azerbaijan was so estranged from Russia in its time. In the Caucasus and Transcaucasia .. There are no people more mentally closer to Russians than Azerbaijanis. But hostility is growing more and more because of such a policy of Russia. If Azerbaijan was an ally of the Russian Federation ... the southern borders of Russia would be reliably covered. And Turkey would rock the boat less.
                    1. -2
                      23 May 2016 00: 53
                      Quote: HERMES
                      You didn’t bet on those

                      We didn’t need to go there at all, this is a mistake. Putin needed to introduce regional peacekeepers there and gradually transfer these districts to Azerbaijan with the autonomy of NGOs under the supervision of peacekeepers and that’s all. The Russian Federation is working economically with you and the Armenians. It's just that Armenians everywhere have a very strong lobby, they know how to work with the elites of those countries where they live.
                      Seichas is already very difficult to carry out this matter in the current situation in Turkey.
            2. +1
              21 May 2016 17: 13
              Quote: razmik72
              My compatriot under the nickname Fhvty especially got it.

              Believe me ... he got me no less than yours)
            3. -4
              22 May 2016 02: 16
              My compatriot under the nickname Fhvty especially got it.

              Just don’t call yourself my compatriot, ah Vasak.
              1. +1
                22 May 2016 02: 30
                Quote: Fhvty
                My compatriot under the nickname Fhvty especially got it.

                Just don’t call yourself my compatriot, ah Vasak.

                "One for all and all for one"...
          2. +2
            21 May 2016 16: 54
            Quote: HERMES
            statement towards Armenians, Azerbaijanis, Ukrainians, Georgians and other "subhumans" judging by the comments.

            So what . Normal practice of trolism, just do not pay attention.
            1. +2
              21 May 2016 17: 24
              Quotation: blooded man
              So what . Normal practice of trolism, just do not pay attention.


              But only if I start trolling in response ...
              I just pity them ... because they may have unauthorized detonation in the area of ​​the 5th point’s displacement with access to the geostationary orbit at the end point wink
        2. +1
          21 May 2016 16: 03
          razmik72 Yes, I agree with you 100% !!
  12. 0
    21 May 2016 12: 15
    the question remained with whom.
  13. 0
    21 May 2016 12: 18
    OTPs can usually be equipped with UBF. In a future war, there may be those who want to provide them. Just now, the Foreign Ministry must protest and object and threaten. Who knows how everything will turn out and where these missiles will be aimed, but ours do not seem to care.
  14. aba
    0
    21 May 2016 12: 25
    “We can deliver point strikes on any object of the enemy. If the Supreme Commander-in-Chief orders, we can strike at Yerevan as well, ”he added.

    Could not specify and so clearly against whom.
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. 0
    21 May 2016 12: 35
    We need to give them ..... or rather to scold and forbid to buy rockets, God forbid they hit Karabakh or Armenia, we do not need a hot spot near by. All the trash from Syria and Afghanistan will quickly catch up and Obama will give them some money to install shit democracy. This is a decision of Erdogan, and not of the Azerbaijani authorities, he began to influence them too much. It is necessary to suppress such initiatives at the root.
    1. +1
      21 May 2016 15: 53
      You have hallucinations about Erdogan ... this conflict existed even before the birth of your Erdogan. And this conflict would continue to burn without him.
  17. +1
    21 May 2016 12: 52
    The 6-7 S-300 divisions that are in service with the air defense of Armenia and NKR, in my opinion, for such a small territory, is an impenetrable dome for any OTR that Azerbaijanis can afford.
    1. 0
      21 May 2016 13: 14
      Interestingly, he can protect objects from long-range MLRS S 300.
      1. 0
        21 May 2016 13: 43
        Interestingly, he can protect objects from long-range MLRS S 300.
        Can it be the same ballistic missiles (large) from which almost zero sense (except the show-off) with their CVO (~ 500 m). But the S-300 will not fight them, for their defeat there are other air defense / missile defense systems
        1. +2
          21 May 2016 15: 48
          At MLRS WS 3, the Chinese KVO up to 50 meters. And there are doubts that the C 300 can intercept 60 missiles in a salvo.
          1. 0
            21 May 2016 15: 58
            The strike of the first wave will be carried out with false missiles in order to completely deplete the ammunition of the NKR and Armenian air defense. The costs of air defense will not be comparable to the price of the destroyed "empty cans". After the first wave, Azerbaijan will reveal the positions of the air defense and missile defense systems of Armenia and NKR ... the second salvo will be launched against them. Armenia will remain without cover.
            1. -1
              21 May 2016 21: 08
              The strike of the first wave will be carried out with false missiles in order to completely deplete the ammunition of the NKR and Armenian air defense. The costs of air defense will not be comparable to the price of the destroyed "empty cans". After the first wave, Azerbaijan will reveal the positions of the air defense and missile defense systems of Armenia and NKR ... the second salvo will be launched against them. Armenia will remain without cover.

              What a wonderful plan! Just brilliant! Of course, the Armenians will sit and watch you shell them with their missiles. In response, of course, nothing will fly. And of course, the S-300 installations will not even guess to change the dislocation, they probably will not have gasoline or the wheels will be lowered.
              1. 0
                21 May 2016 22: 32
                I won’t be surprised that in your army where there are only rambo who single-handedly knock down Azerbaijani saboteurs with whole battalions and this can happen.

                [quote = Fhvty] [quote] Well, of course, the S-300 installations will not even guess to change the dislocation, they probably will not have gasoline or the wheels will be lowered. [/ quote]

                They won’t have time ... the second volley will be carried out by military missiles from pre-loaded installations. The time between the volley, the return air defense volley and the detection of air defense will be a few minutes. Nothing will arrive in response, because your missile forces will not be able to do this, our They also will not be able to defend air defense.
                1. -3
                  21 May 2016 23: 06
                  Well, what am I talking about? Wonderful, brilliant, Azerbaijani PLAN !!!)))
                  And a special thank you for revealing it to us. I will immediately call Seyran Ohanyan and tell him not to shoot at the first missiles! This is "Empty Cans"! So so. We skip the first ones, smoke and wait, beat the second ones, then drop the installations and run into the loose, because we still won't have time to drive away.
                  We take care of our missiles, because it’s all the same clear that SUCH WE WILL NOT TEST.
                  1. +2
                    21 May 2016 23: 43
                    Quote: Fhvty
                    I’ll call Seyran Ohanyan right now,

                    Call, call ... God forbid that he believes in this plan wink
          2. +1
            21 May 2016 20: 46
            There are doubts that the S-300 can intercept the BR.
            This has never happened under combat conditions.
            1. 0
              21 May 2016 21: 05
              Quote: voyaka uh
              This has never happened in combat.

              Well, so much hasn’t happened yet .. in combat ..

              Also - "have doubts"? wink
              1. +1
                21 May 2016 22: 35
                I recall the first failures of the Patriot 1 Scud.
                But on target it was also tested before that ...
                Real goals have their own specifics, and sometimes
                rebuild the entire OMS.
                I have no doubt that the S-300 can bring down a combat aircraft on
                high altitude, but BR ...?
                1. 0
                  21 May 2016 22: 41
                  Quote: voyaka uh
                  I recall the first failures of the Patriot 1 Scud.
                  But on target it was also tested before that ...
                  Real goals have their own specifics, and sometimes
                  rebuild the entire OMS.
                  I have no doubt that the S-300 can bring down a combat aircraft on
                  high altitude, but BR ...?

                  S-300PMU2 will be able to bring down the armaments of the armament of Azerbaijan. They had sharpening for such purposes during modernization.
                  But the Armenians have antediluvian S-300s that can only effectively defeat aviation.
          3. +1
            22 May 2016 10: 54
            MLRS WS 3 Chinese KVO up to 50 meters brought
            When integrated with GPS, without it, at a range of 200 km, approximately KVO is 300-400 m with the best layouts. GPS in the EW coverage area is useless.
            And there are doubts that the C 300 can intercept 60 missiles in a salvo.
            It depends on how many divisions the defending side has, and it may well be so. In addition, it is necessary to take into account the fact that the minimum firing range of such MLRS is 70 km, so it will be very problematic to use it in the mountains (due to terrain).
    2. +2
      21 May 2016 23: 16
      Quote: Fhvty
      6-7 S-300 divisions, which are in service with the air defense of Armenia and NKR, in my opinion, for such a small territory, this is an impenetrable dome for any OTR

      this is decided simply by a large number of OTR. And by the way, a small territory is the main weakness. Since these air defense systems can get and systems of shorter range.
  18. +3
    21 May 2016 13: 57
    “We can deliver point strikes on any object of the enemy. If the Supreme Commander-in-Chief orders, we can strike at Yerevan as well ”

    And nobody said to him that between Armenia and Russia a military alliance? And what a couple of hours after the launch of the rocket, the remnants of Baku will give Yerevan?
    1. 0
      21 May 2016 15: 28
      Quote: Berkut24
      “We can deliver point strikes on any object of the enemy. If the Supreme Commander-in-Chief orders, we can strike at Yerevan as well ”

      And nobody said to him that between Armenia and Russia a military alliance? And what a couple of hours after the launch of the rocket, the remnants of Baku will give Yerevan?


      Something I remember, "Ivan Vasilyevich is changing his profession," he said well "the volosts will not have enough food." So filter the bazaar, the answer is given. They will say you have ruined, give it back! They are.
  19. 0
    21 May 2016 14: 26
    Those who believe that the CSTO is on the territory of Armenia ... do not expect help from Kazakhstan and Kyrgyz Republics ..
    1. 0
      21 May 2016 14: 28
      what kind of pidgin? laughinghowever for me the Kazakh generally dark forest laughing
    2. +2
      21 May 2016 14: 48
      Quote: mm.andə
      Those who believe that the CSTO is on the territory of Armenia ... do not expect help from Kazakhstan and Kyrgyz Republics ..



      And the CSTO itself does not have to wait for help from the Republican soldier
    3. +3
      21 May 2016 15: 15
      Quote: mm.andə
      Those who believe that the CSTO is on the territory of Armenia ... do not expect help from Kazakhstan and Kyrgyz Republics ..

      What? Really, could there be help?
    4. -1
      21 May 2016 15: 31
      Quote: mm.andə
      Those who believe that the CSTO is on the territory of Armenia ... do not expect help from Kazakhstan and Kyrgyz Republics ..

      what farted ?? recourse fool First you need to translate into Russian ... and then wassat ... well, I don’t think, but I know that Armenia is in the Collective Security Treaty Organization .... but I will wait for help from the Kazakhs and Kyrgyz .... EU?
      1. +4
        21 May 2016 16: 03
        This is your garbage CSTO turns ...
        1. +3
          21 May 2016 16: 14
          This is the CSTO, like NATO, it is on paper, but in fact it is not.
    5. +2
      21 May 2016 16: 45
      Quote: mm.andə
      Those who believe that the CSTO is on the territory of Armenia ... do not expect help from Kazakhstan and Kyrgyz Republics ..

      I have already written on this site more than once that the CSTO is not a close-knit organization and I do not expect any special help from anyone, it remains only that most Armenians would understand this and hope for themselves.
      1. +2
        21 May 2016 18: 32
        Quote: razmik72
        All that remains is for the majority of Armenians to understand this and hope for themselves.

        No matter how much you hope for yourself, but without Russia, Armenia will not be able to confront the challenges: Azerbaijan, Turkey, the USA (color revolution). Too small player in the arena, you still need to join someone!
        1. +1
          21 May 2016 20: 21
          Judging by how the latest hostilities covered in the world media - Armenia and Azerbaijan, in general, nobody cares whatsoever - neither the United States, nor the UN, nor the European Union, and what’s going on in the drum there.
  20. 0
    21 May 2016 15: 23
    "Huseynov said that" the fire systems currently in service with Azerbaijan make it possible to strike at any enemy military facility in the occupied Azerbaijani territories. "
    Well, can a country sleep peacefully? Or is the crown crushing ears?
  21. -1
    21 May 2016 16: 04
    Yes - let them buy!

    I definitely do not understand the reasons for such a boiling boil of guano.

    Russia - shock weapons have already run-in. In Syria. Very and very successful.

    As a result, the line-up of military orders grew several years (!) Forward.

    Well, let Azerbaijan now buy another "wunderwaffe" for "100500" money.

    Let it go. For people - you can only rejoice: there is a crisis throughout the world, and they have nowhere to put money.

    They will buy it. And even - they will shoot, and ... (ta-dam!) Will not get!

    Bo, "these insidious Russians", and even "for this case" - will certainly sell the air defense system to the Armenians. Yeah. Newest. Bo - combat tests are needed, and - worldwide advertising.

    Again, the sale of defensive weapons is not prohibited. Armenians - "will put a hat in a circle" (and, the diaspora in the United States is rich!), And - will buy.

    And, as a result, for 100500 money, Azerbaijan will get ... a beautiful "salute"!

    Plus, additionally, with this "salute", generous Azerbaijan will pay for advertising of Russian air defense systems.

    And the turn to the Russian defense industry will double ...

    So, "Wellcome" - for rockets!
  22. -1
    21 May 2016 16: 08
    Something quite azero unbelted, insolently, openly, in fact, declare their intentions.
    1. +2
      21 May 2016 16: 17
      Quote: voliador
      Something quite azero unbelted, insolently, openly, in fact, declare their intentions.

      So that you ... so that you have 20% of the apartment occupied!
      1. +1
        21 May 2016 16: 23
        HERMES "May you ... so that 20% of your apartment is occupied!"
        This is a forbidden trick! Do not touch the toilet!)))
  23. +2
    21 May 2016 16: 34
    Why are we so excited? They have long had rockets.
    Date 10.08.14, 14: 11
    Azerbaijan acquired Israeli-made EXTRA medium-range ballistic missiles (130 km) and long-range missiles (2 000 km) made in Pakistan, hurriyet.com.tr reports.
    It is noted that Russia, in order not to upset the balance of power, does not sell long-range ballistic missiles to Armenia and Azerbaijan. At the same time, Russia installed Iskander operational-tactical missile systems with nuclear warheads at a military base in Armenia near the Turkish border.
    Note that ballistic missiles with a range of 1000 — 5500 kilometers can also be equipped with a nuclear warhead.
    The Israel Military Industries (IMI) missiles have a caliber of 306 mm, a length of 3,97 m, a launch weight of 450 kg and a warhead weight of 125 kg.
    The Pakistani Shahin-1 missile is capable of striking targets at a range of 750 km, while the Hatf-4 is an improved version of the Shahin-1 missile with a longer range. The exact range of the improved Shahin-1A missile under the official name Hatf-4 has not been reported, although the range for medium-range missiles is about 3000 km.

    haqqın.az
    1. 0
      21 May 2016 16: 58
      So, Azerbaijan intends to increase the number of OTRK.
  24. 0
    21 May 2016 17: 05
    In my opinion, EXTRA is enough for the Azerbaijanis. Range of 150 km, KVO 10 m, warhead weight 125 kg. The platform is mobile, and is well known in the military.
    1. +2
      21 May 2016 19: 22
      And on the same platform they have the Israeli Predator Hawk, 250 km. from 200 kg. warhead and within 300 km. with a slightly smaller cassette. Recently, Azerbaijan has not hidden this on its specialized resources ...
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. 0
    21 May 2016 17: 54
    Not sailors by chance are behind the desire to buy these missiles ...
  27. 0
    21 May 2016 19: 25
    “We can deliver point strikes on any object of the enemy. If the Supreme Commander-in-Chief orders, we can strike at Yerevan as well. ”

    The statement is quite provocative. A third party's "podzuzhivanie" (the desire of the Anglo-Saxons to create a hot spot under the belly of Russia and at the same time earn greens by selling weapons to Azerbaijan) is seen. And it looks like Aliyev is not against it (muddy type, unlike dad). Yes
    1. +1
      21 May 2016 20: 30
      The cutest Anglo-Saxons do not sell us weapons. Our suppliers are mainly Russia Israel and Turkey. 80% of offensive weapons we buy from Russia.
      1. +7
        21 May 2016 23: 20
        Quote: Fatih88
        80% of offensive weapons we buy from Russia.

        not not fellow countryman. Do not interfere with them. 80% of offensive weapons are sold by the Russian Federation, Armenia gives the Russian Federation, But the instigators of war are the USA and Europe)))))
  28. vex
    -2
    22 May 2016 10: 48
    Quote: vanavate
    the difference between a Soviet man, a brilliant minister

    Do not you think that the Lavrovs and other state people are getting from parents whom you would not consider normal people? Perhaps it is worth revising your views, studying how many Armenians have worked and are working on all fronts for the glory of RI, the USSR and Russia? This is the story of not only the Armenian, but also the Russian people, you can overcome your complexes.
    It all starts in the family, and in the families of the Armenians everything is in order, they teach good, respect for learning, for work, for the country. Unlike the families of Azerbaijanis, where hatred is taught from the cradle to Armenians, to the indigenous peoples of Azerbaijan, to neighbors, Gentiles, etc.
    1. -2
      22 May 2016 22: 17
      Quote: vex
      Everything begins in the family, and in the families of OUR everything is in order, they teach good, respect for learning, for work, for the country. Unlike the NON-HER families, where hatred towards OURs, indigenous peoples of OUR COUNTRY, neighbors, Gentiles, etc. is taught from the cradle.

      Here is a standard monologue of a nationalist and chauvinist. That is Azerbaijani, Armenian, Russian, Tatar, anyone in general. Until you yourself agree, you’ll hate each other and be proud of your hatred. Well, or wait for the forester.
  29. +1
    22 May 2016 12: 47
    Until recently, many media have been pleased to say that Azerbaijan has turned its back on the United States. And what is the result? Whoever feeds politics dances him! winked

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"