Results of the week. “Have you had any construction accidents?” Did not have? Will be! "
A statement by the Vietnamese ambassador to the Russian Federation, Nguyen Thanh Sean, was published this week. He spoke about how Vietnam would react if Russia were to rebuild a military base in Cam Ranh. With the inherent ornate ornateness, the Ambassador of Vietnam made it clear that the deployment of a Russian military base in Vietnamese territory was in the interests of official Hanoi. From the statement of the Ambassador of Vietnam (Socialist Republic of Vietnam):
Vietnam’s policy is not to join military alliances or to ally with one state against another. In this context, the implementation of the ports of Cam Ranh for multilateral international cooperation in order to provide maritime transport services, ship repairs and the development of military equipment to ensure peace and stability in the region is a suitable direction.
It can be assumed that if the question of the return of the Russian naval base to Cam Ranh really will be decided between Moscow and Hanoi, then our American "partners" will again make a statement on the ornithological or ichthyological topic. For example, they will talk about how a frightened gull can accidentally break through the skin, and a tortoise gnawed the propeller of the Russian Navy missile cruiser in the Kamrani region ...
Will the Chinese comrades be pleased with the return of Russia to Cam Ranh? In Beijing, with rhetoric about crazy seagulls and inadequate turtles, everything is certainly calmer, but the vigorous joy from the Russian return to Vietnam there, too, I suppose, no one is going to experience.
That's just for Russia, this is the tenth case. If there is a strategic interest in Cam Ranh, then why not take advantage of Vietnamese loyalty?
Comments from our readers:
dmi.pris
tiredwithall
Abbra
Wiruz
Where are many wild monkeys
Eh, Thomas, Thomas ... In Russia, they thought that you really were Bach, and you, it turns out, are just pshik ... Well, at least, the statements themselves about the possibility of disqualification of the entire Russian national team and not allowing each of the Russian athletes to the Olympics in Rio, sounding not from someone, but from the President of the IOC, lead to this conclusion.
And someone thought that hamsters from all sorts of gaming and committees that Baron de Coubertin would disperse, excuse me, with ... rags, would they behave differently? It seems that even if the contest held in Sweden was won by Mr. Lazarev, then he would have been two or three weeks on the air of another sentimental talk show that he was at the time of the show "under the meldonium." Well, and that there were no Russians at the Olympics in Brazil, the “friends” decided to play it safe initially, presenting materials with the “authentic” menu of Russian athletes in newspapers like “Honest Democrat” and “Pocket Freedom”:
Breakfast: Meldonia porridge;
lunch: meldonium, baked in meldoniya; dessert “Mutko. Know the criminality.
Dinner: Russian vodka, a lot of Russian vodka.
Comments from our readers:
SSR
PS.
I think our people will cling to this Olympiad to the last, because officials have such travelers, such numbers and women))) and they are so tired that it’s time to go to Brazil. And when Mutko apologized for the athletes with meldonium, why this knysch did not apologize for himself and his ministry, which must respond in time to the innovations being introduced, and not wait for the Western “partners” not to charge the bream in the pond and dirty foot kicked in the ass , worth disgrace, others' drool from the face erases.
Vladimirets
Mikhail m
Reptiloid
HOW and Euro vision. As in science fiction films --- on the visible plane, invisible in the past and the future!
What a barrel of oil we are preparing
In recent days, a barrel of oil has been knocking hard at the door of the price tag of 50 dollars. Moreover, about 2 months ago, there appeared “experts” who predicted oil prices by the end of spring at the level of 20 dollars per barrel and who were anticipating the next stage of how “the Russian economy would be torn to shreds”. There is no great euphoria due to the fact that oil prices have returned to fifty, for the simple reason that a simple formula works in Russia: “the more expensive oil is, the less willing there is to work with specialized officials”. But they are clearly anticipating the euphoria of those very relevant officials. Still - vacation can take place in full! ..
I remember one person saying that at the price of a barrel below 60 dollars, life on Earth almost ceases to exist ... Bankers will be listed in the Red Book ... In the central office of OPEC, they will start to build ritual bonfires ...
Now it turns out that at fifty bucks a barrel, individual government officials, if not rejoicing, are quite obviously in a cheerful mood. With the sixty dollars mentioned above, mass festivities and eating lobsters for a while will begin, and the date of a hypothetical return to a hundred may be announced as a red day of the calendar. And tell me how in this situation to live the old Barak, who almost passed the second level of the computer toy "Tear to Shreds"? ..
Comments from our readers:
Finches
Ami du peuple
andj61
Well, in this case - even easier - and again gives an explanation.
Our economic gurus do exactly the same - forecasts are made not at all thanks to knowledge and not on their basis, but purely by instinct, but in hindsight they can explain absolutely everything!
Citizens of parasites, two steps forward! ..
Last week a lot of noise was made by the statement of the State Secretary - Deputy Minister of Labor and Social Protection Andrei Pudov. The statement concerned the fact that the Ministry of Labor is discussing the possibility of introducing the so-called parasitism tax in the Russian Federation. We are talking about the fact that tax may be imposed on citizens of the country who are at working age, but for a long time (for reasons not related to health, for example) who are not officially engaged in the labor sphere.
Here the main question is who today the state is ready to rank among the parasites? Those who provide themselves and their families with their work, despite “the care of state officials,” or the state officials themselves, who often disguise their status as “advisor to assistant deputy” or “second deputy junior member of the expert council at the monitoring group”? And in general, how to deal with this law, when attendance in the chamber of the lower house of parliament is usually such that it suggests the real lack of money for those who inject voters ...
Comments from our readers:
dmi.pris
Renat
atalef
And if a person is able not to work and he has the means - yes, for health.
The question may lie only in one category of the population, which does not want to work, but at the same time requires providing them with benefits and medical insurance. It is necessary to fight with such a contingent, and the rest ...
Who can afford not to work and does not sit on the taxes of citizens on health.
Persons with disabilities and pensioners should receive the quality and living conditions corresponding to the average level. Children and adolescents - medical care and education. And the rest - work will force life. Or well in the trash.
Such are the "realities"
Last week, all the “progressive humanity” in the face of scooping rules of life exclusively from CNN reports, Voice of America and Radio Liberty reflected on the blockade of one of the creations of that very Radio Liberty website Crimea. Realities. The site was eventually unblocked, however, the publication of conjectures and outright lies bots virtually disappeared.
At one time, “voices of america” and “free radio stations” did their job - they nagged the Soviet people so much that most of the people really began to think what was better: worn jeans as a “humanitarian aid” from the United States or a single country? And then the people no longer asked what was better ... They just threw holey pants, cola, chewing gum and other benefits of democracy into the crowd, and when the people shrank and swallowed completely, he looked around and suddenly realized that his country not.
Do I need to deal with blocking this apparent anti-Russian heresy today? So the point is that in Soviet times they were “jammed” - and what was the point? No, now it is really necessary, as one well-known comrade (who is far from all comrades), to go the other way. Moreover, the Russians (with the rare exception of non-living ones) managed to develop a stable immunity to the ravings of the “most free radio stations and television channels”. The main thing is that we ourselves do not suit our immunity with an impermissible strength test.
Comments from our readers:
Alexander Romanov
Freedom of speech in American.
Rostislav
Mountain shooter
The opposite point of view gives balance to the bipolar picture of the world, and does not allow OUR information systems to “sleep” and cease to work actively. Having found the USSR with its one-sided political information, I would not want their repetition. Since the bias "in the opposite direction", which began during the restructuring, strongly influenced many, causing the majority of the population to be at a loss. Yes, and immoderate love for everything western then going wild. Because of the uncritical perception of information "from there."
Occupants, dear ones, well, buy sprats ...
And you want, and prickly. Approximately according to this logic, there are not too much proud neighbors from the Baltic republics, whose authorities at every corner shout about "Soviet occupation" and "Putin's aggression", and businessmen are increasingly looking to Russia in search of lucrative offers on contracts.
And indeed, when the Western partners left the industrial production of the three Baltic sisters except the factories for the production of smoked sprat, which the Western partners themselves do not need, the politicians still have to concentrate more actively on yelps about Russian aggression, and Peter and Moscow. They say that you pay attention to these politicians - let's trade as before. We say: but before that, the type of "occupation", everything is so ... The Baltic business quietly answers this: your "occupants" gave us the opportunity to receive free education in the best universities of the country, built us houses, gave us work at one time, provided free medical care service, also did not urinate in beds - well, buy sprats already! ..
Comments from our readers:
baudolino
ARES623
Siberian
Tanks for airborne
The commander promised before the end of this year to introduce into the airborne troops 6 tank companies equipped with T-72B3M tanks. And in the future in two years to deploy these companies to full-fledged battalions. The fact is that heavy tanks can not be landed in the usual way. And there are not so many airplanes capable of doing this. Literally individually can be considered. And it is impossible to modernize tanks for landing. So why does General Shamanov make such statements? And makes them not for the future, sometime later, but by the end of this year? Why does the commander need to strengthen the already sufficiently increased fire and armor power of the units and units of the Airborne Forces?
Of course, a lot of technology, good and different, for a particular kind of troops, as they say, does not happen. And therefore, the Airborne Forces can be equipped, as it were, with “Armaty” ... But if they are still tanks, then certainly not to “carry” them through the air - to land on airborne troops (or only those intended to be retained) in the rear of the enemy. To drive back and forth "Ruslans" (which, to put it mildly, not so much), and even though IL-76 for "landing tanks" - not a single military leader, as they say, will drink so much ... But how is a motorized rifle supplement with a good armor and serious caliber - it is quite possible, especially since the Airborne Forces are still a separate branch of the military, and not something in the composition of something ... And God himself ordered a separate branch of the army to count on itself under any conditions formed on TV .
Comments from our readers:
svp67
Alex_59
In Soviet times, there was an experimental army corps of a mixed motorized rifle paratrooper unit. It was supposed to act according to a similar scheme. The paratroopers in helicopters seized the object in the depth of the defense, and the ground component of the corps, with a powerful concentrated blow, broke through in a narrow area to this already captured object on the ground with its tanks and artillery. But this was done in the interests of the ground forces, and not the airborne troops, i.e. tasks were solved tactical.
domokl
Moore
-tanki paratroopers are needed when using them as ordinary motorized infantry;
- nobody in their right mind would take tanks through the air to captured and held objects in conditions of unsuppressed enemy air defenses.
Science at the Security Council
The implementation of existing plans to upgrade the armed forces and modernize the defense industry continues. In parallel with such work, measures are being taken aimed at optimizing the programs carried out and fixing the problems identified. A few days ago, the Russian Security Council held a regular event dedicated to the development of the defense industry.
The council discussed the main directions of development of the technological sphere of Russia. These are communications, navigation, control, intelligence, EW and more. The very fact that such meetings are being held is already being set up in a positive way, because quite recently it has been assumed that the development of technology inside Russia is a laugh to chickens, because "everything can be ordered from the Chinese or the Germans, and then organize a quick screwdriver assembly" . However, the well-known events made the pot boil. The main thing is that the process of "cooking" is not limited to the only paper conclusions, and was closer to practical reality.
Comments from our readers:
Atos_kin
Astrey
iorius
Sing about the facts
Discussion of the politicized Eurovision Song Contest continues. In connection with the victory in the competition of the Ukrainian singer, who performed the song “1944” about the deportation of Crimean Tatars, the world began to discuss which version of the song should be offered as an answer worthy of the first prize. The Norwegian political scientist Bjorn Nistad invited Russia to nominate an artist with a song about the atrocities of Bandera and his associates in World War II: “Ukrainian fascists, Bandera and his friends, killed Poles, Jews and other ethnic groups during World War II. According to the logic of the jury, this is also historical a fact that happened a long time ago. “Russian artists have the right to sing about Bandera’s atrocities next year, because that’s also not politics.”
Recall, the Ukrainian junta is still barking with Western mongrels, accusing Russia of either “aggression” or “annexation”. In the meantime, the Maidan regime continues to commit crimes against civilians in Donbass. And the situation in Ukraine is terrible - real tyranny reigns in the country, and there is nothing to say about the economy: total collapse, corruption, theft, and even the IMF does not want to give any more money.
And on “Eurovision” appears Jamal. And the political performance becomes a pop art farce. In this case, indeed - why not sing to political scientists?
Comments from our readers:
Michael67
Major Yurik
Tatyana
I do not believe that Jamala did not understand that she consciously participates in political provocation against the historical truth of the overwhelming overthrow of the Crimean Tatars during the Second World War and against Russia - the country in which she lives hospitably with her parents, being a citizen of Ukraine. You just need to expel such enemies of the Russian Federation from the country! Especially because she is a foreigner. Delov something! What problems can there be if its political action had such a negative, hostile, negative political response? During the new war with Russia, she first soaped up somewhere in the United States or England. The “legs” of her song seem to be growing there.
For example, a young lady from Maidanov with a dream of “lace panties” in the EU and aggressiveness against Russia did not provide the job in the Russian Federation she was counting on. She still sticks out in Ukraine. And with Jamal everything for Russia is much politically steeper and much more hostile!
Need to take action. NATO is now threatening Russia with war with might and main, and why do we need Jamal in our rear ?!
The future of the Russian defense can be seen today
Russian defense assets are already enough to neutralize the attack and give a decent response. The country's leadership returned to the original principle of defense formation. “Necessary sufficiency,” A. Staver calls this principle. “Does it matter how many times nuclear weapons of any country can destroy the planet?” Once or ten ... Is it so important to have a lot? Maybe it is enough to have so much to be sure of the 100% reflection of the attack and the 100% destruction of the enemy? ”- argues the observer.
In the coming years, we will hear about the latest systems that will be a headache for potential opponents.
The systematic reforming of the army, which, according to a senior American general, made the modern Russian army the strongest since the collapse of the USSR, is of great concern to other strategists across the ocean. And this is the best indicator of the correctness of reforms in the army. In addition, successful operations in Syria and Crimea showed the world the capabilities of Russia.
Comments from our readers:
Ivan Slavyanin
Mitek
This is not the point. The problem is that in Russia the population is very crowded in several places, and the breakthrough of even one military bloc leads to disastrous consequences. There will be no time for evacuation. The bomb shelter system is dead.
Shiva83483
“History will not forgive us”
NATO fears that Russia will further increase its presence in the Black Sea and deprive the alliance of operational maneuver, according to the Financial Times.
“I told him (NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg):“ You are almost absent in the Black Sea. It almost became a Russian lake. If we do not act now, history will not forgive us, ”RIA quotes“News»The words of Turkish President Erdogan spoken in Istanbul at a meeting of the chiefs of staff of the Balkan countries.
According to the NATO military committee, “Russia creates military power in the sea that goes beyond its borders, and in this way Moscow is able to deprive the alliance of operational maneuver near NATO borders,” the Financial Times article says.
As a matter of fact, not one Turkish president was worried about turning the sea into a "lake". The Ukrainian leader Poroshenko also showed discontent with the Russian invasion. Unlike the “neosultan”, the Kiev candy king not only spoke about the need to strengthen the alliance’s position in the Black Sea, but also approved Romania’s plans to create a “separate Black Sea flotilla within NATO. ”
Comments from our readers:
SANA_59
cniza
Tatyana
In fact, war is either bad governance (war of despair), or correcting deficiencies of management, or imposing and securing roles as part of management.
The war has two important principles: the principle of "justice" and the principle of "profit".
And if the principle of “justice” of war is always the basis of agreement in society regarding its conduct, then the principle of “the benefits of war” is the main principle of searching for and attracting strategic allies and forming the necessary coalitions out of them.
Erdogan benefits from a predatory war in Syria, although it is unfair, and this “benefit” is more important to him than peace with Russia and peace in the Balkans. For the sake of the war in Syria, Erdogan is creating a military coalition in the Balkans against Russia just in the interests of the Pentagon and thus creates the threat of a war of NATO countries in the Balkans with Russia.
Erdogan’s provocative statements and a gathering of NATO militarists of the Balkan countries in Turkey are called upon to prepare the people of the Balkan countries to realize that they are supposedly “just” declaring war against Russia.
American militarists, of course, Erdogan applaud!
Washington's dream came true ... in Moscow
The tests of the airballistic warhead for the new Russian Sarmat rocket showed that Russia will soon become the only country in the world capable of destroying any target anywhere in the world in half an hour without using nuclear weapons. weapon. Moscow was the first to accomplish what it had long dreamed of in Washington. The RS-28 “Sarmat” intercontinental missile, which the Kremlin plans to put into service over the next two years, mixed American card generals, writes Konstantin Dushenov in a newspaper "Tomorrow".
From now on, attempts by the United States and NATO to gain quality military superiority over the Kremlin are doomed to failure. A military victory over Russia, as in Soviet times, has become absolutely impossible, Dushenov believes. In his opinion, the personal achievement of President Putin is indisputable in achieving such a result. Already in the foreseeable future, Russia will turn "into the universally recognized leader of the world resistance to the God-given globalization, the main defender of the traditional spiritual, religious, moral and historical values of all the peoples of the Earth in the face of the global aggression of the God-given West." And the author concludes: “Help us, Lord! Amen".
Comments from our readers:
Michael67
They must understand that in the event of their aggression there will be no nuclear strike with the death of a multitude of the population and, accordingly, there will be no reason to cry about inhumanity. It will be every "exceptional" hypersound with arctic fox personally in the window. Well, in the pindagon, of course, with the State Department. There yours all polls ohreneli.
Volzhanin
And we all streamline and wipe, shuffling with shamefully leg.
What is the catch then? I do not believe that everything is so smooth.
akeloya
In addition to the military theater of action, there is also an information one. Where we are losing very much, the sanctions have not been lifted so far, although it is intuitively clear who shot down the plane, whose real Crimea is, who is fighting in the Donbas, etc. The same UN - we don’t have as many allies in the Security Council has a usa.
Again, if you look at the history, then every breakthrough in the development of weapons is a worthy answer. Yes, if the rocket is such as is written in the article, it will give us a good strike weapon for long distances, but it will also force the scientific world to look for ways to neutralize these weapons, as it was during the entire cold war. And so on to infinity.
In the first varenichnuyu
Victoria Nuland held a meeting with the Assistant to the President of Russia Vladislav Surkov, after which she went to her favorite Russian establishment - “Varenichnaya No. XXUMX”. 1 May “Twitter” has boiled over, the news has stirred up the world community: Nuland is eating Russian food again! On the eve Nuland discussed with Mr. Surkov and Mr. Ryabkov the settlement of the Ukrainian conflict.
Nuland said later that the negotiations were held in a constructive manner. “I'm leaving home after a constructive round of talks. This is very important: keep the conversation going, try to solve problems together, ”the RT channel quotes the diplomat.
Nuland traditionally noted that the White House insists on the speedy implementation of the Minsk agreements. This time, she added that, under the implementation of the agreements, Western sanctions could be lifted from Russia.
The conflict in the Donbas before the presidential election in the US White House is unprofitable. Relations with Russia is one of the most important topics in the speeches of both Hillary Clinton and her competitors, including the expressive Trump, who promised to negotiate with all American geopolitical opponents, including Putin and even Kim Jong-un. Such pre-election statements do not leave H. Clinton, now a popular figure in the USA again, nothing more than to follow a similar peace-loving line, and even surpass opponents. The exacerbation of the situation and the launch of a new arms race are not what many Americans want today, and even among the military there is a serious protest against the alleged increase in the number of US ground forces in Europe and the new large budget allocations for weapons.
Or maybe the whole thing in the dumplings that are served in Russia? Maybe they have a wonderful property to tune in a peaceful way?
Comments from our readers:
siberalt
kot28.ru
Dam
Knocked grandmother
For two months, it took American financiers to properly respond to Saudi “blackmailers”, in March threatening to sell off Treasury securities and other US assets worth $ 750 billion. Recently, the US Treasury for the first time released data on the debt to Saudi Arabia. The amount of debt to Riyadh - total 116,8 billion dollars. True, the US Treasury doubts the accuracy of this indicator ...
If the Saudis talk about US liabilities of approximately $ 750 billion, the US Treasury gives out much smaller numbers, albeit with a reservation: Saudi Arabia’s foreign exchange reserves, they say, are 587 billion dollars, and two-thirds of such reserves are usually expressed in dollars. Therefore, the US debt to Saudi Arabia may not amount to 116,8 billion dollars, but much more. The US Treasury does not deny this, only it can not bring exact figures!
However, for a department that for more than forty years secretly owes to the Saudis, this is apparently an ordinary practice. We would not be surprised if the Americans “lose” some of the debts, and then, you see, the “color revolution” will break out in the kingdom. The former “strategic” friendship between Washington and Riyadh is already gone. Yes, and now the Americans own oil, shale. Now, former strategic partners have become economic competitors.
Comments from our readers:
pest
Ivan Slavyanin
DanSabaka
1) Arabs are prone to exaggeration, could easily and lie the size of their American securities.
2) Americans - masters play with numbers. Could cut their debts WITHOUT accounting for debt obligations to individuals and foundations, and in the case of the Arab monarchies the difference between the state treasury and the czar's treasury is very small.
3) A massive sale of US debt will lead to a fall in their value and allow the US to buy up its debts for cheap, which is certainly PROFITABLE for the US itself. There is a simple bluff.
Nikolay K
Zoldat_A
The Germans understood how to give goat cabbage to preserve (that is, to America gold). They only asked to look, not even to pick up, - no, they say, it was, and now it’s gone somewhere ... And the Germans, characteristically, got lost ...
Pro Billy Miner
Mrs. Clinton said the other day that if she was elected to the presidency, she would instruct her husband Bill “to revive the economy”. She hinted that Mr. Clinton's knowledge would be particularly useful somewhere in the coal-mining areas of the country and in other places not so remote.
Here is what she said (the grammar of the original is preserved as far as possible, quoted in ABC News): "My husband, whom I am going to make responsible for reviving the economy, because you know that he knows how to do it." As a potential Democratic candidate noted, “especially” Bill will come in handy “in such places” where coal is mined, as well as “in other parts of our country”.
It seems that Billy's little wife, unwittingly, humiliated her husband, trying to exalt him.
Apparently, the old Billy is destined to go to the mines, become a proletarian and breathe coal dust. No wonder it is popular among the workers. Well, Mrs. Clinton will find a young intern in the White House ...
Comments from our readers:
razmik72
rotmistr60
And these (no words) parading struggle with corruption all over the world. This is where corruption flourishes in rampant color.
Knizhnik
One on one with nature
The current Britain does not like the current British. Life in London and its surroundings is a great disappointment. Many British are ready to move far away, just to get away from the damned islands. Mans British Britons: there, they say, Putin distributes land for free. Not in Moscow, of course, but “in the Siberian wilderness,” one British newspaper points out. Well, the British are ready to be alone with nature and temper the character.
As the Express.co.uk poll showed, eight out of ten UK citizens seriously consider the idea of emigration ... to Russia. This is not a joke: almost 80% of those polled by the Express newspaper are already considering moving to Russia.
True, despite the amazing natural beauty of Siberia, some of the British are afraid of bears. There is an opinion in London that “too many hungry bears” wander around Russia in winter.
Others covered fear of the cold. They learn that in those places where Putin offers to settle for free, it is minus forty seven degrees on the Celsius scale. This greatly reduces the attractiveness of the idea of moving to Russia.
Finally, the British fear and clouds of mosquitoes that fly and bite people in the summer.
Nevertheless, there is interest in the project. The Russian Embassy in Britain confirmed the newspaper "Express": yes, "a number of Britons have already shown interest in the project."
It is curious, by the way, that none of the respondents questioned “democracy” in Russia, did not call Putin a “tyrant,” said nothing about corruption. On the contrary, the British gentlemen are very dissatisfied with their own government, whose top ranking does not reach 35%. But President Putin is just fascinating to the British. They really like this Putin, that they are ready to throw Britain to the devil and move, despite the clouds of mosquitoes and hungry bears, into the “Siberian wilderness”. There, former islanders will be able to admire the natural beauty and forge character. Real Russian character, I guess.
Comments from our readers:
EvgNik
Corsair
Well, well, I'm just waiting for the invasion of the survivalists, it seems, all DiCaprio looked at the romance, damn it.
DimerVladimer
But the places are beautiful!
Here is the village of Sikiyaz-Tamak - there is light and a satellite phone! And the bear lives in 4 km. True, there is no bridge :(. When Sikyaz is bottled, they live like a month on an island - do not drive ...
alex-cn
Mahmut
* “Have you had any construction accidents? Did not have? There will be! ”- a phrase from the movie“ Operation Y and Other Adventures of Shurik ”
Information