Clinton: Trump's utterances complicate Americans' fight against terrorism

59
The statements that Donald Trump allows himself to do during the election race are extremely dangerous for America, reports RIA News Trump's rival presidential election, Hillary Clinton.

Clinton: Trump's utterances complicate Americans' fight against terrorism


In an interview with CNN, Clinton said: "Trump says a lot of provocative things that complicate the international coalition against terrorism."

When asked to clarify what was going on, she said: “For example, when he talks about the ban on Muslims from entering the US. This is a signal of disrespect to them. ”

Moreover, Trump “attacked the closest ally of the United States, the United Kingdom, spoke out against NATO and spoke in favor of more countries having nuclear weapons“, Recalled Clinton.

“This is an extremely dangerous rhetoric,” she added.

To the question “Do you think Trump is qualified enough to become the president of the United States?” Clinton replied: “No, I don’t think so.”
  • AP Photo / Luis Magana / Nati Harnik
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    20 May 2016 08: 15
    I’m watching Trump, and for some reason Zhirinovsky immediately appears before his eyes. Such a politician as president will not hurt America. Shakes off the dust. If this works out...
    1. +16
      20 May 2016 08: 21
      Quote: Abbra
      I’m watching Trump, and for some reason Zhirinovsky immediately appears before his eyes. Such a politician as president will not hurt America. Shakes off the dust. If this works out...

      That Trump, that Clintonsha, that owl about stump, that we kick about the owl, one gang of watering can, only the rhetoric is different. It will not be better. There will be no worse. request
      1. +8
        20 May 2016 08: 25
        Quote: vovanpain
        Quote: Abbra
        I’m watching Trump, and for some reason Zhirinovsky immediately appears before his eyes. Such a politician as president will not hurt America. Shakes off the dust. If this works out...

        That Trump, that Clintonsha, that owl about stump, that we kick about the owl, one gang of watering can, only the rhetoric is different. It will not be better. There will be no worse. request



        It’s absolutely true that elections will be held and whoever won everything will return to square one, and these are only election slogans.
        1. +2
          20 May 2016 09: 15
          Of all that Clinton said, one can agree with only one:
          When asked, “Do you think Trump is qualified enough to become the president of the United States,” Clinton replied, “No, I don’t think so.”
          Otherwise they are both two boots - a pair! They have the same “masters” behind them, and the requirements for both of them on the part of their “masters” will be the same. This while they are showing everyone the pre-election "concert", and then it will be all according to Chernomyrdin's catchphrase "We wanted the best - it turned out, as always!"
          1. +4
            20 May 2016 10: 49
            Quote: Tatiana
            Otherwise, they are both two boots - a pair! Behind them, the “owners” are the same, and the requirements for both of them from the side of their “owners” will be the same.

            -------------------------
            Trump campaigns for his money. He does not need the money of TNCs, the military-industrial complex and Wall Street. Trump sincerely wants to return at least a semblance of self-respect for a simple American. Stop costly military adventures that require more resources. Another question is, will he be able to achieve something? Here lobbyists, congressmen and senators will already come out. In general, there is no need to lay special hopes. It will be as it will be.
            1. 0
              20 May 2016 23: 26
              Quote: Altona
              Trump campaigns for his money. He does not need the money of TNCs, the military-industrial complex and Wall Street.


              They had one such billionaire president, also elected on his own money and put a bolt on the interests of Wall Street. John Fitzgerald Kennedy was called ... crying
          2. 0
            20 May 2016 17: 56
            Quote: Tatiana
            Of all that Clinton said, one can agree with only one:
            When asked, “Do you think Trump is qualified enough to become the president of the United States,” Clinton replied, “No, I don’t think so.”
            Otherwise they are both two boots - a pair! They have the same “masters” behind them, and the requirements for both of them on the part of their “masters” will be the same. This while they are showing everyone the pre-election "concert", and then it will be all according to Chernomyrdin's catchphrase "We wanted the best - it turned out, as always!"


            The fact of the matter is that the "owners" are different.
            Clinton - global bankers.
            Trump is an industrialist.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. 0
        20 May 2016 10: 14
        If anyone is stopping the fight against terror, it’s Barack Hussein Obama, who blew up the entire Middle East and unfrozen tens of billions of dollars for Iran, the largest sponsor of terror.
        Trump for the presidency !!!
        1. +1
          20 May 2016 10: 19
          Why do you think the United States has untied Iran’s hands?
          1. -2
            20 May 2016 10: 58
            I think because Obama is liberal and pacifist, at the very least and naively, believes that Iran will abide by the agreements, at least during its cadence. And after him, even a flood
            1. +3
              20 May 2016 11: 18
              that Obama is a liberal and pacifist in the extreme and naive way,
              I thought that we were so naive, it turns out that there are enough in Israel. Tell me, how many hot spots appeared in this case, the pacifist, and about Iran, it’s better to say than to fight.
              1. +1
                20 May 2016 12: 50
                So the hot spots appeared precisely because of the pacifist Obama. Just as Chamberlain and Daladier's pacifism greatly contributed to the outbreak of World War II.
            2. +3
              20 May 2016 11: 42
              Quote: seren
              I think because Obama is liberal and pacifist, at the very least and naively, believes that Iran will abide by the agreements, at least during its cadence. And after him, even a flood

              Fuck what a pacifist !!! Carried the whole Middle East. He is already transparently hinting that the peace prize is not bad, would be returned !!!
            3. +3
              20 May 2016 12: 15
              This is not about Obama, but about trends in US policy in general. Previously, when something was done in the Middle East, they always thought: how will this affect Israel? Not now. One gets the impression that even for the diaspora, the lobby of your compatriots, the United States has become number one. As someone put it, "the tail twirls the dog," and I am not saying that this is good or bad, or anyone else. The alignment and vectors of forces in the region are changing, the United States is also changing its strategy. "Launching" Iran into the big game suggested itself - it was necessary to "put the squeeze" on the Russian Federation with oil prices and compensate for the "Sunni" factor. Some of the not particularly favored groups in Israel, who "also seem to be against ISIS," needed support; they bargained for them from the USA, in return. And what will happen in the region later ... the Yankees never think about "later", especially since it is so far from their homes ...
              1. +1
                20 May 2016 12: 53
                For you to understand, 80% of my fellow tribesmen in America are left-wing liberals and, accordingly, Israel is very cool. Israel's main support for America among white Christians, especially among evangelicals
                1. 0
                  20 May 2016 16: 43
                  80% of my compatriots in America are left-wing liberals and, accordingly, Israel is very cool.


                  recourse
        2. +1
          20 May 2016 23: 38
          Quote: seren
          for Iran, the biggest sponsor of terror.


          The largest sponsor of terror is the United States. In 2nd place is their client Saudia. And Iran didn’t even stand nearby! Or do you consider only those who are terrorists in Israel suits terrorist attacks - and in Moscow, Paris, Brussels is it done by "freedom fighters"? stop
      4. +2
        20 May 2016 10: 14
        That one, that the other are dolls, and the puppeteers behind the screen, for what string they pull, so the puppet will behave.
    2. +1
      20 May 2016 08: 21
      Quote: Abbra
      I’m watching Trump, and for some reason Zhirinovsky immediately appears before his eyes. Such a politician as president will not hurt America. Shakes off the dust. If this works out...



      . . . You should not compare Zhirinovsky with them; he is a politician not so unambiguous. . .
      1. +6
        20 May 2016 08: 31
        I do not compare, Zhirinovsky - cooler and smarter. But for the US, Trump will do.
        1. +3
          20 May 2016 08: 40
          Quote: Abbra
          I do not compare, Zhirinovsky - cooler and smarter. But for the US, Trump will do.


          Yes, just American politicians are associated as very distant (uneducated people) and not knowing the honor.
          And compare with our people.
    3. The comment was deleted.
    4. +6
      20 May 2016 09: 28
      Why should we lay out the internal electoral "toys" of the United States? These are their problems, but why should we wang? The United States has a long-term foreign policy course, which practically does not depend on the personality of the president.
      1. 0
        20 May 2016 10: 16
        It depends how. For example, it’s a great success for Russia that now the president is such a jerk as Obama
        1. +5
          20 May 2016 10: 35
          Quote: seren
          For example, it’s a great success for Russia that now the president is such a jerk as Obama


          and what about Huseynich were better individuals? Husseinich is only raking up the poop that Clinton and Bush left him ... they set fire to the east already then ... for me it’s better to be Hillary - recognizable and predictable ... he doesn’t shine with intellect, thinks in patterns ... laughing
        2. +1
          20 May 2016 11: 20
          It depends how. For example, it’s a great success for Russia that now the president is such a jerk as Obama,
          I understand that if you were, there wouldn’t be a single plate whole in the world.
        3. +2
          20 May 2016 12: 21
          Look at what the United States did during the Obama period, and this is against the background of a sharp strengthening of the Russian Federation; another president would have “blown away” long ago and backed down. Obama is by no means weak, he just ended up "at the wrong time and in the wrong place."
        4. 0
          20 May 2016 15: 44
          Quote: seren
          , Russia's great fortune that now the president is such a jerk as Obama

          I agree. It’s always harder to be smart. And it doesn’t matter if the smart guy is good or bad. hi
    5. +1
      20 May 2016 10: 55
      Quote: Abbra
      I’m watching Trump, and for some reason Zhirinovsky immediately appears before his eyes. Such a politician as president will not hurt America. Shakes off the dust. If this works out...

      Maybe we can shake off the dust. Zh Irinovsky, what can you take from him.
  2. +6
    20 May 2016 08: 16
    Well, it's obvious. . .

    When asked, "Do you think Clinton is qualified enough to become the president of the United States," Trump replied: "No, I don’t think so."

    . . . what to make an article from this show. . .
    . . . read about this TEAM, distant to us by mentality. . . they have the same thing and nothing changes.
  3. +5
    20 May 2016 08: 17
    In an interview with CNN, Clinton said: "Trump says a lot of provocative things that complicate the international coalition against terrorism."

    oh how !!!! one person has become a threat to a whole coalition recourse
  4. +9
    20 May 2016 08: 19
    Enrage already inadequate performances of this exalted lady. And God forbid the Americans to elect this lady as president. She will lead humanity to disaster. If she considers Trump to be an insufficiently qualified candidate, then who is she?
    1. +3
      20 May 2016 09: 08
      Quote: Amurets
      Enrage already inadequate performances of this exalted lady. And God forbid the Americans to elect this lady as president. She will lead humanity to disaster. If she considers Trump to be an insufficiently qualified candidate, then who is she?

      Wow! The terrorist who killed Gadafi. Wow! A good clip will turn out, to drive all the crap and blood on the screen mixed with her "Wow".
  5. +9
    20 May 2016 08: 21
    judging by the habits of the Clintonsha and, in this case, answers to questions, this beast is afraid of trump though.
    1. +2
      20 May 2016 11: 25
      It seems that another candidate began to appear - Mr. Yeulustoun sad
      but they are silent about his election campaign
  6. +4
    20 May 2016 08: 30
    In an interview with CNN, Clinton said: "Trump says a lot of provocative things that complicate the international coalition against terrorism."
    And in terrorists, she will write everyone she wants ... exceptional America ...
  7. 0
    20 May 2016 08: 39
    in omerega, the president is just a talking head, he is limited in power and after the election he will say what the powerful people tell him, otherwise, how is it they’ve got a bullet in their forehead, a solemn funeral and new elections, so who cares who will be there he doesn’t order politics in earnest, although Trump is more fun than the old witch
  8. +3
    20 May 2016 08: 40
    Clinton: Trump's utterances complicate Americans' fight against terrorism

    Trump only complicates Clinton makes this fight not possible!
  9. +2
    20 May 2016 08: 43
    It seems that Suede (our rush) wrote.
    Utterances который Donald Trump allows himself during the election race

    Before you write in the dictionary you need to look.
    1. +3
      20 May 2016 08: 51
      Yes, he wrote from the phone, and he periodically rules himself. I have the same problem, although I am quite educated. So do not comment on these errors.
      1. +6
        20 May 2016 09: 15
        BARKASa and ATOMSHCHIK forgive. Recommend them to use other phones.


        Dal, Ozhegov.ZPT laughing
      2. 0
        24 May 2016 13: 30
        Quote: Atomic
        Yes, he wrote from the phone, and he periodically rules himself. I have the same problem, although I am quite educated. So do not comment on these errors.

        Where is the letter Y and where is E, they do not stand nearby everywhere. If only in the head.
  10. +5
    20 May 2016 08: 46
    Statements that Donald Trump allows himself during the election race are extremely dangerous for America, RIA Novosti reports a statement by Trump rival to the presidency of the United States Hillary Clinton.
    Yeah, and the leaks of "stamped" documents, which are carried out by Hilaruga so-so, is a small prank. Oh, whose cow would moan ...
    1. +2
      20 May 2016 08: 50
      Quote: svp67
      Yeah, and the leaks of "stamped" documents, which are carried out by Hilaruga so-so, is a small prank. Oh, whose cow would moan ...

      But the whole world found out why it suddenly Bashar al-Assad became a bloody dictator.
  11. +2
    20 May 2016 08: 57
    Hilariha apparently wants to neighing over the mockery and death of Bashar but Assad is not given as easy as Gaddafi
    1. +2
      20 May 2016 09: 55
      Hilarika according to Freud takes revenge on Lewinsky. And she chose Russia as an object of revenge for Freud. This is such a clever idea, but do not be offended ... I think so.
      1. +2
        20 May 2016 10: 07
        Quote: Abbra
        Hilarika according to Freud takes revenge on Lewinsky. And she chose Russia as an object of revenge for Freud. This is such a clever idea, but do not be offended ... I think so.


        Somehow small, it would be more correct to take Monica Lewinsky back, it would turn out very tolerant wink
  12. +6
    20 May 2016 08: 57
    Trump interferes with the fight against terrorists, to "breeding" which in large numbers has put the paw of the Clintons. Now then she manages.
    But in fact, this is demonstrated to us by the struggle of the "isolationists" (like it's time to take up your own country, it's good to build the whole world, it still doesn't work) with the "globalists" (Matrasia is a hegemon, and there is nothing to argue about, We'll see how it will be in reality. It's not long left.
    1. +2
      20 May 2016 09: 19
      Trump prevents the breeding of terrorists in the United States.
  13. +5
    20 May 2016 09: 01
    When asked, “Do you think Trump is qualified enough to become the president of the United States,” Clinton replied, “No, I don’t think so.”

    What does Clinton think of her own qualifications? It's better to ask Obama about this. He endured his first term ........... qualified as head of the State Department only due to the fact that it was imposed on him even before the elections (more precisely, during the elections). For 4 years she "corrected" his reputation so that for the second term he got rid of this "specialist" ahead of his screeching. Now this unsinkable, if God forbid, gets into the presidency, then she will rule there that one does not want to think about it.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. 0
      20 May 2016 23: 44
      Quote: techie
      What does Clinton think of his own qualifications? It’s better to ask Obama about this.


      Better than Bill! But that "purple haze" does not know how to do - definitely! laughing
  14. +2
    20 May 2016 09: 01
    May there be no America for the elections ... I feel the genes. (Meehan (s) laughing
  15. +2
    20 May 2016 09: 05
    Already tired of this mandavoshka with diarrhea from the pg`avo-protective pack.
  16. +2
    20 May 2016 09: 32
    If you collect all their verbal diarrhea in one bucket, mix and pour three-liter ro, then all the banks will have the same thing - pre-election verbiage.
  17. +3
    20 May 2016 09: 35
    Quote: Taygerus
    Trump is funnier than the old witch


    I wouldn't say so. In recent decades, their presidents are one cooler than the other. Now an actor, now a cowboy, now sexually preoccupied, now - a black man, and then, according to the law of the genre, either a pederast or a woman. So Trump doesn't fit in with "fun."
    1. +2
      20 May 2016 10: 03
      Quote: beer-youk
      Quote: Taygerus
      Trump is funnier than the old witch


      I wouldn't say so. In recent decades, their presidents are one cooler than the other. Now an actor, now a cowboy, now sexually preoccupied, now - a black man, and then, according to the law of the genre, either a pederast or a woman. So Trump doesn't fit in with "fun."


      It’s not yet an election, you look closer to the Trump finale and confesses that his wife is not a woman at all, but a transvestite Abu Nasser to satisfy the entire voting star wink
  18. +7
    20 May 2016 09: 49
    Is America fighting terrorism? In my opinion, she nurtured him, and now imitates a fight with him, because the world saw what kind of monster turned out. America’s dream, to send it to Russia, and Russia destroys it in the bud. This is where America has to maneuver.
  19. +6
    20 May 2016 10: 21
    The coming of Hillary Clinton to power is a triumph of neocons, the third world is becoming a reality.
  20. +1
    20 May 2016 10: 44
    From any president of the United States, a policy towards Russia
    will not change, even if it is colorful, even Conchita.
  21. +2
    20 May 2016 12: 21
    On October 26, 2016, Hillary Rodham Clinton will be 70 years old. If she becomes president, America will get an old grandmother.
    1. +3
      20 May 2016 14: 31
      The Americans will get this!
      1. +2
        20 May 2016 14: 38
        Quote: igorek
        The Americans will get this!

        The second, I mean, the case
        Cristina Elisabeth Fernández de Kirchner (Spanish: Cristina Elisabet Fernández de Kirchner / kɾisˈtina eˈlisaβet ferˈnandes ðe ˈkirʃner /; genus 19 February 1953 year, La Plata, Buenos Aires province, Argentina) 55th President of Argentina from December 10, 2007 to December 10, 2015. She replaced her husband Nestor Kirchner at this post. She became the second woman president of Argentina (after Isabel Peron) and the first woman president of Argentina as a result of the elections.
  22. cap
    0
    20 May 2016 14: 59
    Clinton: Trump's utterances complicate Americans' fight against terrorism

    Bees against honey.
  23. 0
    20 May 2016 20: 33
    Imagine that the trump has been mishandled by the Cossacks and for them it will become an ANALAG of our EBN, and the United States will be banned ....

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar people (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned), Kirill Budanov (included to the Rosfinmonitoring list of terrorists and extremists)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"