Military Review

OSCE Secretary General announced consideration of the possibility of sending a police mission to Donbass

74
OSCE Secretary General Lamberto Zannier reported that the organization is considering the possibility of sending a police mission to “separate areas of the Donetsk and Lugansk regions” (this is what the DPR and the LPR are called in Kiev). Recall that earlier the initiative to send a police mission (OSCE or EU) was made by the President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko.


OSCE Secretary General announced consideration of the possibility of sending a police mission to Donbass


According to Lamberto Zanier, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe is ready to send “hundreds of policemen to the Donbass to maintain order during the local elections.” At the same time, the head of the OSCE notes that the leadership of the organization will take a positive decision if all parties to the negotiation process in Ukraine vote for the use of such a mission in the region. It is reported by the news agency Associated Press.

Against this background, it became known about the next repeated shelling of the territory of the Donetsk People's Republic by the Ukrainian security forces. Thus, in the western outskirts of Donetsk, as well as in Dokuchaevsk and the military checkpoint of the DPR armed forces in the area of ​​the Yasinovataya settlement, from the Ukrainian positions, more than 60 mines were released only one evening. Reports about it Donetsk News Agency.

In addition to mines, grenade launchers, anti-tank missiles, small weapon. As a result of the shelling, a house burned down in a suburb of Donetsk, Dokuchaevsk infrastructure facilities were damaged. No injuries were reported among the local population.
Photos used:
http://www.osce.org/sg
74 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. avvg
    avvg 20 May 2016 07: 06
    +32
    In the Donbass it will be against. In the Donbass they have already announced that they will regard the armed police of the OSCE as an intervention.
    1. Ami du peuple
      Ami du peuple 20 May 2016 07: 32
      0
      Quote: avvg
      In the Donbass they have already said that they will regard the armed police of the OSCE as an intervention

      Well, let’s say they will assess .. On April 14, during a direct line, the President of Russia supported Poroshenko’s idea of ​​introducing armed OSCE observers on the contact line. Well, there is not far to the participation of international police forces in ensuring some kind of "maintenance of order during the local elections", i.e. the subsequent deployment of "peacekeepers" throughout the DPR and LPR, including "international" control over the border of the unrecognized republics with the Russian Federation.
      Who do you think will prevail?
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 20 May 2016 07: 37
        +13
        Everything that comes from Poroshenko does not cause the slightest confidence!
        Petruha Waltzman is an absolutely destructive type!
        He is an American henchman, war criminal, the destroyer of Ukraine, the seller of the free Ukrainian lands! And trembling for his life, like an aspen leaf!
        1. Ami du peuple
          Ami du peuple 20 May 2016 07: 54
          -3
          Quote: Tatiana
          Petruha Waltzman is an absolutely destructive type!

          Really? But the leadership of the Russian Federation does not think so:
          “President Petro Poroshenko is the best chance that Ukraine currently has,” said Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in an interview with France’s French television channel France on 24 https://russian.rt.com/article/14.12.2014
          Or is there something wrong with Ukraine, since it is only worthy of such a "destructive type"?
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null 20 May 2016 07: 59
            +8
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Quote: Tatiana
            Petruha Waltzman is an absolutely destructive type!

            Really? But the leadership of the Russian Federation does not think so:
            “President Petro Poroshenko is the best chance that Ukraine currently has,” said Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in an interview with French television channel France 24. 14.12.2014/XNUMX/XNUMX

            - Can you personally name another candidate? Of the real ones, mean?

            For lack of a stamp - they write in simple.
            Best of the worst available at hand.
            For lack of a maid - we have a gardener wink

            But the diplomat said no way ..

            That's something like request
            1. Ami du peuple
              Ami du peuple 20 May 2016 08: 18
              +1
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              But the diplomat said no way ..
              Yes, you are simply an unsurpassed seeker of secret meanings and a discoverer of hidden thoughts! Well, how did I not immediately guess ?! Yes, the best chance for Ukraine is the one who came to power (as a result of the coup d'etat and rigged pseudo-elections) as a direct protege of our sworn meager friends! Naturally, such a worthy person had to be recognized. Even if he has on his territory a legitimate president of Ukraine, removed from office in violation of all constitutional norms.
              1. Cat man null
                Cat man null 20 May 2016 08: 27
                +5
                Quote: Ami du peuple
                Yes, you are simply an unsurpassed seeker of secret meanings and a discoverer of hidden thoughts!

                - blah blah blah...
                - try to answer the question, in two, more precisely:

                1. Who of the really existing Ukrainian "political figures" would now be "better than Poroshenko" in his place?
                2. What else could Lavrov say (who perfectly understands that Poroshenko is a dunghill)

                Quote: Ami du peuple
                Naturally, such a worthy person had to be recognized.

                Do not distort wink

                - Poroshenko won the "election"
                - from now on it is legitimate (do you remember the meaning of the word?)
                - from that moment he was recognized

                And that’s all ..
                1. Tatyana
                  Tatyana 20 May 2016 08: 39
                  +5
                  Ami du peuple
                  Quote: Tatiana
                  Petruha Waltzman is an absolutely destructive type!
                  Really? But the leadership of the Russian Federation does not think so:
                  “President Petro Poroshenko is the best chance that Ukraine currently has,” said Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in an interview with France’s French television channel France on 24 https://russian.rt.com/article/14.12.2014
                  Or is there something wrong with Ukraine, since it is only worthy of such a "destructive type"?

                  Well, if you take into account that such persons as Parubiy (!) Can come to power in Ukraine as president of Ukraine, then, yes, drunk Poroshenko is “the BEST chance Ukraine currently has,” according to S Lavrov.
                  Poroshenko has at least some kind of brain enlightenment outside the binge, and from time to time Russian diplomats can at least somehow "communicate" with him.
                  Then, of course, you can understand S. Lavrov!
                2. The comment was deleted.
                3. Ami du peuple
                  Ami du peuple 20 May 2016 08: 48
                  +5
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  1. Who of the really existing Ukrainian "political figures" would now be "better than Poroshenko" in his place?
                  Of those running? Tigipko, for example. Or the son of a female dog, Misha Dobkin. Yes, even the rear-wheel drive Lyashko is even more preferable - he is at least really a Ukrainian nationalist, and not an American rug. smile
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  2. What else could Lavrov say (who perfectly understands that Poroshenko is a dunghill)
                  Please: "We respect the choice of the Ukrainian people, but for the Russian Federation, V.F. Yanukovych remains the legitimate President of Ukraine, until changes are made to the Constitution and the procedure for his impeachment is observed. And guarantees given by the foreign ministers are also observed. France, Germany and Poland, the now illegally ousted leader of the Ukrainian state. Russia firmly stands for the observance of all international and state laws and treaties. "
                  Quote: Cat Man Null
                  Do not distort
                  Yes, not at all! It could well not recognize on the above arguments. However, they tried to exchange the Kiev junta for international recognition of the Russian status of Crimea. As we see - to no avail.
                  1. Cat man null
                    Cat man null 20 May 2016 09: 15
                    0
                    Quote: Ami du peuple
                    We respect the choice of the Ukrainian people, but for the Russian Federation V.F.Yanukovych remains the legal President of Ukraine

                    - already very funny .. that is:
                    - the opinion of the people of Ukraine - separately, the results of the "elections" (which the West recognized .. I repeat - according to the results of these "elections" Poroshenko is legitimate .. "clothed", so-skat, "the trust of the people") - Russia on the drum ..
                    - and in Russia own pride own opinion .. ABOUT HOW belay

                    Quote: Ami du peuple
                    V.F.Yanukovych remains until amendments to the Constitution are made and the procedure for impeachment is followed

                    - Yes, they wrote off Yanukovych already. De facto. no one is interested in the procedure ..

                    Quote: Ami du peuple
                    And also the guarantees given by the foreign ministers of France, Germany and Poland to the now illegally removed head of the Ukrainian state were observed

                    - yeah .. and a couple of snowdrifts last year’s snow in addition laughing

                    Quote: Ami du peuple
                    Russia firmly stands for compliance with all international and state laws and treaties

                    - and then get in response that a thread on the topic of Crimea, huh .. in the setup, estimate?

                    Not .. Lavrov, as a diplomat, I still more .. cute tongue

                    Quote: Ami du peuple
                    It may well not recognize the above arguments

                    - could not. Once again, by division:
                    - after the "election" - Poroshenko - legitimate - President - Ukraine
                    - all

                    PS: I leave all the candidates you named on your own conscience. My IMHO in this case is better known and relatively predictable Poroshenko than no one knows.

                    There can be no non-pro-American "president" in Ukraine now. From the word "absolutely", it is not for this that the States have invested so much effort and money in them.
                    1. dauria
                      dauria 20 May 2016 09: 30
                      -1
                      Once again, by division:
                      - after the "election" - Poroshenko - legitimate - President - Ukraine
                      - all


                      Look how "everything and everything here" smile "All to be silent !!!" smile

                      Assad election how many countries did not recognize, recall?
                      the communique of the European Union said that the presidential election in Syria “cannot be seen as a truly democratic vote. The European Union believes that these elections are illegitimate and undermine political efforts to find a way out of this terrible crisis. ”
                      And the elections in Ukraine, the better if there was no part of the country? Nobody pulled Putin by the ears to recognize, they could talk and decide without recognition
                      1. Cat man null
                        Cat man null 20 May 2016 09: 40
                        +2
                        Quote: dauria
                        Keep silence for everyone !!!

                        - not so then .. "Be silent, I'm asking you !!!"
                        - I didn’t say that, mind you ... you yourself just invented it request

                        Quote: dauria
                        Assad election how many countries did not recognize, recall?
                        And the elections in Ukraine, the better if there was no part of the country? Nobody pulled Putin by the ears to recognize, they could talk and decide without recognition

                        You see ..

                        - as far as can be seen now, some "games" were originally supposed with the participation of the Russian Federation and Ukraine (represented by its new .. um .. establishment)
                        - it would be impossible, for example, to sign the same Minsk (due to which the States and Europe are shaking the same Poroshenko as a pear) without recognizing that this ... um ... lobster is the legitimately elected President of Ukria

                        Poroshenko’s non-recognition would completely cut off the opportunity to influence him and, through him, the situation. Including and around LDNR.

                        IMHO, essno yes
                      2. unsinkable
                        unsinkable 20 May 2016 16: 42
                        0
                        Quote: dauria
                        Nobody pulled Putin by the ears to recognize, they could talk and decide without recognition

                        To know for what reason they recognized. Maybe there was no dispute.
              2. The comment was deleted.
            2. The comment was deleted.
            3. The comment was deleted.
          2. DenZ
            DenZ 20 May 2016 09: 49
            +1
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in an interview with French television channel France 24. 14.12.2014/XNUMX/XNUMX

            As if in the courtyard it was almost the middle of 15 years. Do you think Lavrov was of the same opinion as in December of the 14th year ???
          3. 33 Watcher
            33 Watcher 20 May 2016 10: 51
            0
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            “President Petro Poroshenko is the best chance that Ukraine currently has”

            Well, you understand that everything is known in comparison ..? Petya just climbs in contrast laughing
            Imagine, for example, Farion and the role of president ...
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Or is there something wrong with Ukraine, since it is only worthy of such a "destructive type"?

            With Ukraine, really, something is wrong, I would say everything is wrong. I don’t see any construct there at all, for a long time, very.
            Then they conquer the Donetsk airport, then Crimea, then they go to take the Kuban, then Moscow, they were going to Vladik ... request Well, what construct can you find here? The boiler on the Maidan, they didn’t put it, the enemies of the revolution live in it, they don’t cook, it’s already good. Local beliefs from Africa, do not adopt, is also good.
          4. imugn
            imugn 20 May 2016 14: 19
            0
            "Best chance" of all possible "destructive types" :-)
          5. unsinkable
            unsinkable 20 May 2016 16: 28
            0
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Sergey Lavrov

            Dear, you probably do not know that Lavrov is DIPLOMAT. That is, of the highest class.
        2. Korvin1000
          Korvin1000 20 May 2016 08: 15
          +2
          The mission should include Russian troops.
        3. Igor Polovodov
          Igor Polovodov 20 May 2016 10: 36
          0
          Waltzemore, in short ...
        4. The comment was deleted.
      2. cniza
        cniza 20 May 2016 07: 38
        +4
        They want to freeze the conflict and always be able to create problems for Russia.
        1. alex-cn
          alex-cn 20 May 2016 08: 34
          +6
          Troops, even police, should not be in the elections in Donbass. but observers must be called upon in large numbers, so that later there was no need to argue ...
      3. The comment was deleted.
      4. Cat man null
        Cat man null 20 May 2016 07: 50
        +7
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Who do you think will prevail?

        - let's first separate the opinion of the President of the Russian Federation from your personal

        Quote: Ami du peuple
        On April 14, the Russian President supported the idea of ​​Poroshenko on introducing OSCE armed observers to the demarcation line during a direct line.

        This is the opinion of the President of the Russian Federation.

        - that is, "observers" will be used as a buffer in the line of fire
        - perfect solution! And let them ukrovska little bang-bang ..

        Quote: Ami du peuple
        there is close to ... the deployment of "peacekeepers" throughout the DPR and LPR, including "international" control over the border of the unrecognized republics with the Russian Federation

        But this is your personal speculation .. have nothing to do with the expressed GDP.

        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Who do you think will prevail?

        - well, it’s clearly not yours yes

        IMHO, yes ..
        1. Ami du peuple
          Ami du peuple 20 May 2016 08: 06
          +1
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          - that is, "observers" will be used as a buffer in the line of fire
          - perfect solution! And let them ukrovska little bang-bang ..
          The OSCE mission is already monitoring the demarcation line and the ukrovermacht periodically makes a "bang-bang" along them. The international community has zero reactions. How the armed obsessions will behave is a question. Perhaps they will open return fire and something tells me that the direction is opposite to the Ukrainian positions.
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          But this is your personal speculation .. have nothing to do with the expressed GDP.
          Pure logic: Putin supported the idea of ​​introducing peacekeepers, provided he supported the idea of ​​the OSCE. The OSCE Secretary General supported and developed the idea further. Why would the President of the Russian Federation not agree with the opinion of a respected person?
          Quote: Cat Man Null
          well, clearly not yours
          I do not impose my opinion on anyone. "Blessed is he who believes, warmth to that in the world!" You are clearly not cold hi
          1. Cat man null
            Cat man null 20 May 2016 08: 19
            +1
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            OSCE mission already monitors the demarcation line

            - from time to time riding there on mafinki ..

            Quote: Ami du peuple
            How do armed obsessors behave - a question

            - they would (as armed (!) policemen (!!)) be equipped with checkpoints .. on the demarcation line (I dream so, yes)

            Quote: Ami du peuple
            maybe they will return fire and something tells me that in the direction opposite to Ukrainian positions

            - again your fantasy .. that is - for me bang-bang, I turn my back to "bang-bang" and also start .. brrrrrrr ... It's strange somehow, IMHO

            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Pure logic: Putin supported the idea of ​​introducing peacekeepers, provided he supported the idea of ​​the OSCE. The OSCE Secretary General supported and developed the idea further. Why would the President of the Russian Federation not agree with the opinion of a respected person?

            - interesting idea what wait and see ..
            - although - the introduction on the line of demarcation on a permanent basis and the introduction of the interior for the duration of the elections - this is not quite "supported and developed further", is it?

            Quote: Ami du peuple
            "Blessed is he who believes, warmth to that in the world!" You are clearly not cold

            - I'm just not an alarmist request
            1. Ami du peuple
              Ami du peuple 20 May 2016 08: 31
              +2
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              - from time to time riding there on mafinki ..
              Why so? They also let drones smile
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              - again your fantasy .. that is - for me bang-bang, I turn my back to "bang-bang" and also start .. brrrrrrr ... It's strange somehow, IMHO
              Maybe strange. Just suggested by analogy with Kosovo - for the KFOR mission there was always one party, the Serbs, guilty. But those forces were under the auspices of NATO, but OSCE officials are undoubtedly much more objective. I take my words back.
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              - I'm just not an alarmist
              I noticed smile For me, there is one huge plus in this scenario (with the introduction of a police mission throughout the territory of the ORLDO) - no one will be able to accuse Russia of direct military aggression against Ukraine. I do not see any more advantages.
              1. anykin
                anykin 20 May 2016 10: 07
                0
                Ami du peuple, you contradict yourself:
                "ukrovermacht periodically does" a little bang-bang. "How the armed obseshniki-question will behave. Possibly they will open return fire and something tells me that in the direction opposite to the Ukrainian positions."
                "With the introduction of a police mission on the entire territory of ORDLO, there is one huge plus - no one can accuse Russia of direct military aggression against Ukraine."

                Is inadequate Observers bad, then Observers good?
                1. Ami du peuple
                  Ami du peuple 20 May 2016 10: 48
                  +1
                  Quote: anykin
                  Ami du peuple, you contradict yourself: Either inadequate Observers are bad, then Observers are good?
                  What is the contradiction, explain? For the militia and the population of Donbass - this is bad, for Russia and the Russians - good. Relatively good, again.
                  1. kotvov
                    kotvov 20 May 2016 11: 29
                    0
                    ? For the militia and the population of Donbass - this is bad, for Russia and the Russians - good. Relatively good, again. ,,
                    It can’t be good for Russia and Russians, if it’s bad for Donbass.
              2. The comment was deleted.
          2. nekot
            nekot 20 May 2016 11: 18
            +1
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Perhaps they will return fire and something tells me that in the direction opposite to Ukrainian positions.

            Something that tells you, maybe not quite an angel7)) blaming the shelling is one thing, but when you are shot at and you turn your back to them and shoot the other way, there should be strong enough motivation, don’t you?)) But even if they shot, then what?
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            Why would the President of the Russian Federation not agree with the opinion of a respected person?

            There is no logic here. With the same success: Why would the President of the Russian Federation (a state independent of the Council of Europe) agree with the opinion of a "respected" (by the way, who is respected?)))?
          3. unsinkable
            unsinkable 20 May 2016 16: 54
            0
            Quote: Ami du peuple
            The OSCE Secretary General supported and developed the idea further. Why would the President of the Russian Federation not agree with the opinion of a respected person?

            I agree with your opponent. This is again your PERSONAL opinion .. You give out your assumptions as happened. hi
      5. sapper2
        sapper2 20 May 2016 09: 43
        +3
        Is this an informational stuffing? This is a Kosovo scenario. I would not want the DPR \ Russia \ to go for it. Checking public opinion?
      6. Nyrobsky
        Nyrobsky 20 May 2016 11: 17
        +1
        Quote: Ami du peuple
        Who do you think will prevail?

        Complex issue.
        It is clear that if they enter there, then it will be very problematic to "smoke" them, and the issue of crossing the territory of Donetsk and Lugansk regions from the demarcation line to the line of administrative boundaries will hang in the "never" format.
        Although, if the "interested" decide the issue of reformatting Ukraine from a unitary state to a federal state, with the special status of the LPNR being consolidated, then there is a likelihood of a peaceful withdrawal of the Armed Forces of Ukraine to (or beyond) the administrative borders. This is if they agree.
        Well, there is a high probability that this statement is nothing more than an attempt to put pressure on Russia and a demonstration of a solution to the problem in the interests of one side. Then, in order to avoid the imposed "solution", the felling will simply begin to forcefully expel the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the occupied territories of the LPNR.
        There is no doubt that the "Peacekeepers" will be there, no matter what .... The only question is - on which line they will have time to be stuck. It may turn out that this will be the Dnieper line)))
      7. Koresh
        Koresh 20 May 2016 11: 54
        0
        I think I will outweigh the opinion of Ukrainian right-wing radical forces that will not accept and will not allow elections to be held in the Donbass. There today Azov is holding a rally under a parliament against these elections. And I think a certain number of military men will also be against this. Well, judge for yourself what will happen in Kiev when they pass the law on elections, sign it and start preparing for them? I can already imagine how they’re burning a bunch of children ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. 33 Watcher
      33 Watcher 20 May 2016 07: 41
      +2
      Quote: avvg
      In the Donbass it will be against. In the Donbass they have already announced that they will regard the armed police of the OSCE as an intervention.

      Exactly! Apparently Europe is bored with coffins ... I hope our pornography will not support ..?
    4. vovanpain
      vovanpain 20 May 2016 08: 03
      +17
      Quote: avvg
      In the Donbass it will be against. In the Donbass they have already announced that they will regard the armed police of the OSCE as an intervention.

      I agree that my colleague and Donetsk and Lugansk have already stated that not a single hoax punitive porn party or Ukrainian politician will ever set foot on the land of LDNR. hi And I’ll add a little: Congratulations to Mikhail Tolstoy (Givi) on replenishment in the family, so that the son grows up worthy of his father. (The news is somewhat outdated, but better late than never). love(Cry)
    5. Blondy
      Blondy 20 May 2016 08: 32
      +2
      As far as I know, the OSCE does not have such powers to independently send police missions somewhere. So this is a chatter in favor of the poor.
    6. Volzhanin
      Volzhanin 20 May 2016 08: 45
      +2
      And rightly so! Without snotty sun shines!
      Geyropa will answer and pay for the intervention of the outskirts!
      Think they get away with it? No, it won't do!
      We’ll ask them for everything!
    7. The comment was deleted.
    8. siberalt
      siberalt 20 May 2016 09: 10
      +2
      And who will let them go there? Blind, and even with weapons laughing
    9. ludoger
      ludoger 20 May 2016 14: 12
      0
      since Ukrainians can’t invite NATO cleanly, now they want to enter some disguised people. I hope the number does not pass
  2. azbukin77
    azbukin77 20 May 2016 07: 09
    +6
    This is a direct violation of the Minsk agreements !!! If Potroshenko asks for an introduction - wait for provocations!
  3. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 20 May 2016 07: 10
    +6
    After sending keifor, Kosovo became Albanian. Petya, How would Donbass not become Russian !?
    1. Aleksander
      Aleksander 20 May 2016 07: 49
      +5
      Quote: Dmitry Potapov
      After sending keifor, Kosovo became Albanian. Petya, How would Donbass not become Russian !?

      And after the keifor was sent to BiH and Croatia, the Serbs were either killed and expelled from their territories or forced to "peace" on humiliating terms of the West and Muslims.
      The goal was the destruction, expulsion and humiliation of the Serbs, and today the goal is the same only now Russian in the Donbass.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. Putinets
    Putinets 20 May 2016 07: 12
    +3
    They are consciously aggravating the conflict. By the way, an interesting article http://politobzor.net/show-93307-ukraina-uhod-rossiyskih-bankov-oznachaet-neizbe
    zhnuyu-voynu.html
  5. istealth
    istealth 20 May 2016 07: 15
    +3
    Does it make sense to worry about hundreds of policemen in the elections? Maybe, on the contrary, it will allow our "partners" to say that people are not being driven to vote at gunpoint? Or am I missing something?
    1. Putinets
      Putinets 20 May 2016 07: 21
      +7
      If at least one policeman is beaten, the geyropa will raise a howl and start screaming about the NATO peacekeeper entering, etc. And this is war
    2. Egoza
      Egoza 20 May 2016 07: 25
      +7
      Quote: istealth
      But does it make sense to worry about hundreds of policemen at the polls?

      this is how the OSCE talks about the elections, and Petya asks to introduce a police mission (read troops) right now. And they seem to have already agreed to increase the number of "observers" to 800 people. it is not clear only for whom the police should be watching there. And then the APU fired at the Natsiks, or even completely confuse where to shoot. again drunkenness, drug addiction ...
      It would be better if the OSCE police were sent to the Rada. That's where the unplowed field is! 25% of the deputies "indulge" in drugs - this is the official statement of the head of the department dealing with "drug affairs". Fights - constantly, Klitschko is not on them. Well, and other "excesses".
  6. Mountain shooter
    Mountain shooter 20 May 2016 07: 16
    +8
    But who will let them go there? They, and with their drones and observers of the Liberal Democratic Party, were bored with it, because they did not see the obvious at point blank range. So they will still be with weapons! That’s an attack. And what laws do you have to follow? Which, whose? So they will open a pre-trial detention center, or immediately a secret CIA prison?
    Dill knows what they are doing. Yes, just did not take into account that the AGREEMENT is needed from the territory that receives these policemen.
    1. Reptiloid
      Reptiloid 20 May 2016 07: 24
      +2
      Zakharchenko already said, after those words of Poroshenko, that he was against. And the Secretary General agreed and made a reservation.
    2. svp67
      svp67 20 May 2016 07: 30
      +2
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Dill knows what they are doing.

      Which is a HUGE doubt. For me, so "they do not know what they are doing," otherwise why so often "peremogues" turn into "zrada"
  7. alfa19638
    alfa19638 20 May 2016 07: 24
    +4
    In no case should you allow the sending of a police mission to Donbass - this will intensify the actions of Ukrainians in carrying out terror and limit the actions of militia
  8. svp67
    svp67 20 May 2016 07: 29
    +5
    According to Lamberto Zannier, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe is ready to send “hundreds of policemen to Donbass to maintain order during the local elections”
    I would call a spade a spade that the West is ready to send companies and battalions of "gendarmes" to Donbass ...
    Oh, apparently not many of their ancestors are buried in those parts
  9. avg-mgn
    avg-mgn 20 May 2016 07: 48
    +1
    Another scam under the auspices of the United States and its satellites. The OSCE mission has failed; now, under its guise, they want to drag some hired specialists (no matter how they are called). Zakharchenko is right - a stranger with weapons on the territory of the republic, this is the enemy of the DPR and is subject to destruction. But they will not hear him (they will rather pretend) and climb in for the sole purpose of continuing the massacre.
  10. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 20 May 2016 07: 48
    +3
    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe is ready send to Donbass “hundreds of policemen to maintain order
    For some reason, the SS sonder commands were remembered at once. And the text highlighted in bold as from a directive of Himmler was torn out .... Before that, they fought with Pravosekov's new "Galicia", now these want to come. Who are the next? NATO peacekeeping mission ...?
  11. krops777
    krops777 20 May 2016 07: 50
    +5
    OSCE Secretary General announced consideration of the possibility of sending a police mission to Donbass

    Who will let these "deer" go there, if only for a reason to start a war.
  12. solovey
    solovey 20 May 2016 07: 51
    +2
    This OSCE mission is another setup that looks like the Anglo-Saxons did to Libya !!!
    My opinion should be time-consuming and the problem itself will disappear - a little wink
  13. The comment was deleted.
  14. nemo9
    nemo9 20 May 2016 07: 57
    +1
    And this so-called. "OSCE Police Mission", will it be on the tanks ?!
  15. Yak-15
    Yak-15 20 May 2016 08: 04
    0
    So this is war.
    1. Alexander Romanov
      Alexander Romanov 20 May 2016 08: 08
      +1
      Quote: YAK-15
      So this is war.

      With whom?
  16. Barakuda
    Barakuda 20 May 2016 08: 11
    0
    They did not ask us. am
  17. Taygerus
    Taygerus 20 May 2016 08: 12
    +2
    I think this will only worsen the already tense situation, here the coloring of the OSCE machines will not end, they can burn it, the population’s trust in this organization will be completely zero, and if they still use weapons, they will definitely replenish the chernozem as their ancestors did more than once
  18. Abbra
    Abbra 20 May 2016 08: 16
    0
    They, these policemen, will soon be killed on both sides ... And this will end there ...
  19. magdama
    magdama 20 May 2016 08: 33
    0
    All this has already happened in Serbian Krajina. (Damn ... Krajina ... Ukraine ... Specific analogy) Poroshenko will not offer "bad"? Oh well..
  20. AID.S
    AID.S 20 May 2016 08: 44
    0
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    “President Petro Poroshenko is the best chance that Ukraine currently has,” said Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in an interview with France’s French television channel France on 24 https://russian.rt.com/article/14.12.2014

    Then the phrase about morons was cut out.
  21. cte-power
    cte-power 20 May 2016 08: 54
    0
    And what obs = UN ????
    who gave them the right to introduce peacekeepers?
    roughly speaking, the European empire decided to send troops to the Donbass
    also we can solve and introduce them
  22. novel66
    novel66 20 May 2016 09: 02
    +1
    by the way, a step aside. Yesterday I scored in Yandex the "line of demarcation in Donetsk" (well, count it on your fingers) and a bunch of pro-Khuntov's sites fell out, where the militants and the Russian army are concentrating and preparing for the offensive. It's a shame, b.l.i.n, but where is our analytics?
  23. koralvit
    koralvit 20 May 2016 09: 04
    +2
    The OSCE has a mandate to monitor the maintenance of the ceasefire. At least you perform these functions in good faith. APU conducts regular shelling of the territory of Donbass, but you don’t see and don’t hear why? Poroshenko kills his civilians living in the Donbass and Lugansk, you do not see this. And you also want to come to LDNR with weapons, against whom? Potroshenko will remove his APU and no police mission will be needed.
  24. Denis Skiff
    Denis Skiff 20 May 2016 11: 06
    +2
    when they will begin to call everything by their proper names?
  25. sergey2017
    sergey2017 20 May 2016 11: 37
    +1
    This is not necessary at all! Imagine the presence of a corrupt OSCE police unit in the DPR and LPR?
  26. Pitot
    Pitot 20 May 2016 12: 03
    +1
    I wonder why the police, not peacekeeping? Geyropa completely because of her torn glasses spectacles lost. Nits ...
    1. cap
      cap 20 May 2016 16: 14
      0
      Quote: Pitot
      I wonder why the police, not peacekeeping? Geyropa completely because of her torn glasses spectacles lost. Nits ...


      Not a word. Although you are 100% right. good
  27. 31rus2
    31rus2 20 May 2016 12: 11
    0
    Dear, at least you imagine the process of deployment and control, placed, then the APU started shelling and what? Or the naive people think that the very presence of the ceasefire law, it’s ridiculous, but if the shelling of the APU mission will be followed by the introduction of troops, this is another song
  28. Mentat
    Mentat 20 May 2016 12: 25
    +1
    Quote: Ami du peuple
    Quote: avvg
    In the Donbass they have already said that they will regard the armed police of the OSCE as an intervention

    Well, let’s say they will assess .. On April 14, during a direct line, the President of Russia supported Poroshenko’s idea of ​​introducing armed OSCE observers on the contact line. Well, there is not far to the participation of international police forces in ensuring some kind of "maintenance of order during the local elections", i.e. the subsequent deployment of "peacekeepers" throughout the DPR and LPR, including "international" control over the border of the unrecognized republics with the Russian Federation.
    Who do you think will prevail?

    Russia simply will not allow this to be done. Actually, indirectly, the opinion was already voiced through representatives of the Donbass. The line of demarcation is one thing, alien paramilitary units throughout the territory are completely different. Why are you confusing this, sucking your "close" out of your finger and gulping - it's not clear.
  29. Samoyed
    Samoyed 20 May 2016 12: 33
    0
    And who does not comply with the Minsk agreement? If the OSCE does not provide true information about this, then what will they do with weapons in their hands? Remind the secretary general - first the implementation of the Minsk agreements. And it looks like a troll - leads away.
  30. samarin1969
    samarin1969 20 May 2016 17: 37
    +1
    They will send "policemen" to the DPR ... Now there is a bargaining: how much Russia will pay for their maintenance.
    A "guarantor" is a "guarantor" for the "Russians". His "partners" are in Kiev, in Brussels and "Pyotr Alekseevich". Donetsk residents are simply an economically disadvantageous region.