Military Review

The Pentagon called the interception of an American reconnaissance aircraft by Chinese fighters "unsafe"

64
The US military spreads the message that the Chinese Air Force fighters intercepted an American reconnaissance aircraft over the South China Sea. About it informs news agency "France Press" with reference to high-ranking US military. Attention is drawn to the fact that in the Pentagon, as in the case of the interception of reconnaissance aircraft of the US Air Force by Russian fighters, interception by Chinese aircraft was called "unsafe."




Pentagon Post (translation RIA News):
Department of Defense Analyzes Interception of US Patrol Reconnaissance Aircraft aviation United States with two tactical aircraft of the PRC, which occurred on May 17. Initial data characterizes the incident as unsafe.


It seems that the US military over the past decades have obviously managed to get used to the greenhouse conditions of service. And as soon as in the vicinity of the reconnaissance aircraft or the ships of the United States appear the planes of any other state, the Pentagon immediately announces an “unsafe approach” or “unprofessional interception”.

Recall that in the US on the eve of the possibility of "collision with a gull" Russian Su-24, flying over the deck of the destroyer "Donald Cook" in the Baltic Sea, adding that such a "collision could lead to tragic consequences."
Photos used:
www.discred.ru
64 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. sa-ag
    sa-ag 19 May 2016 06: 22
    +13
    "... One gets the impression that the US military over the past decades has clearly managed to get used to the greenhouse conditions of service."

    No, most likely not entirely correct interpretation of the words, in fact this is such a veiled warning
    1. Vladimirets
      Vladimirets 19 May 2016 06: 24
      +9
      Quote: sa-ag
      veiled warning

      371st, Chinese. wink
      1. Tatyana
        Tatyana 19 May 2016 07: 11
        +22
        "Exceptional" Americans from the Pentagon, as always, persistently impose their own - safe and beneficial only for themselves - international "rules" of behavior of foreign states in relation to their "gentle" American military aircraft and ships near foreign state borders.
        1. roadsmell
          roadsmell 19 May 2016 07: 27
          +5
          Tatyana, absolutely hit the spot!

          At first there is inflated hysteria, and then, as we can see today, projecting onto the Russian Federation, daily, unrelated to any risks begin flights of amers almost over the territory of the Russian Federation and now China.
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 19 May 2016 08: 39
            +1
            roadsmell
            Tatyana, absolutely hit the spot!

            At first there is inflated hysteria, and then, as we can see today, projecting onto the Russian Federation, daily, unrelated to any risks begin flights of amers almost over the territory of the Russian Federation and now China.
            Vyacheslav, you said everything correctly. This is called applying APPLIED psychology in military affairs.
            In parasites, APPLIED psychology is always in first place. They study it carefully and use it constantly as a WEAPON to manipulate people. Unfortunately, in a socialist non-parasitic society, in the USSR, for example, applied offensive and defensive psychology against parasites was in the background. If they dealt with it, it was only the special services, and then not all and not everyone. This educational "front" of the struggle of the USSR and the Warsaw Pact countries with the capitalist West was greatly weakened.
            1. roadsmell
              roadsmell 19 May 2016 12: 51
              +2
              Tatyana, it’s very sad that we still don’t use the same methods.
              In fact, what prevents us from raising a similar excitement on the flights of amer-scouts, accusing them of a short-term violation of the airspace, failure to comply with the interceptor's requirements to change the course, failure to make contact with the interceptors, in a deliberate "unsafe approach" with the interceptors? And so for each flight, with a note and a warning about the use of weapons.
              And even if all of the above was not there, the main thing is to raise a wave. Let the Americans wash ... tormented with the evidence that the allegations are unfounded.
              And when the wave has already been lifted - use warning weapons.

              I am sure for 100 - among Amers, the desire to fly along the borders will come down to a level close to zero.
              1. Tatyana
                Tatyana 19 May 2016 16: 56
                0
                roadsmell
                Tatyana, it’s very sad that we still don’t use the same methods.
                Vyacheslav, I absolutely agree with you! That's exactly what we need to act too!
                By the way, abroad, such things were indulged in and taught great importance. Well, for example, in this regard, at least the Adam Smith Institute in the United Kingdom should be mentioned. There they will teach to arrange "natives" around the finger the only way! And in Russia, it seems, in this educational place, we both had a “hole” and remained a “hole”.

                The Adam Smith Institute, abbreviated to ASI, was founded in 1977 and is a think tank based in London, named after one of the founders of modern economics, Adam Smith. He supports the "FREE" market and the classic LIBERAL views, especially by creating RADICAL strategic options in the light of public choice theory that politicians can draw upon and further develop.
                Madsen Peary, founder and president of the Adam Smith Institute, said that "We offer things that people regard as being on the verge of IMMABILITY. ... politics." [1]
                Madsen Peary is widely seen as the architect of privatistaion Thatcher politics.
                In other words, ASI is a transnational research and educational structure of the United Kingdom for the theoretical servicing of the civilization business of the SEA, which is registered as a non-governmental non-profit organization (there are allegedly official funds, donations and any other dregs), but which is implemented through a business partnership with various state structures of different countries in the form of conducting their theoretical experiments on people, peoples, states by wounds of civilization of the SEA (England, USA, the US Federal Reserve and their multinational companies) and in their elite interests. ASI has representative offices in almost all countries.
                For example, in Moscow the Representative Office of the ADAMA SMITH Institute is located on Tverskaya St., 12, p. 9.
                In terms of manipulating people and exposing them, for example, an interesting book by the president of the Institute, Adami Smith, prof. logic and philosophy, which I advise you to read.
                Piri M. iron arguments. Victory, even if you're wrong. - SPb .: Peter, 2013. - 192 sec. - (Series "To himself a psychologist") In electronic form, it is available on the Internet.
                1. Talgat
                  Talgat 19 May 2016 18: 22
                  0
                  such news is regularly repeated - only instead of "Chinese fighter" there was "Russian"

                  It seems that the news will be repeated - only the words "Russian" will alternate with "Chinese"

                  Once again confirms that the mattresses are actually 2 of the main adversary - Russia and China
    2. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 19 May 2016 06: 28
      +5
      What warning? Amerz? Rather, the last Chinese-to fly into the air to American aircraft is unsafe ..
      1. Simon
        Simon 19 May 2016 06: 57
        +11
        Yes, the Americans can’t understand in any way that the safest thing for their military equipment is to stand planes in hangars and ships in ports. request fool
        1. okunevich_rv
          okunevich_rv 19 May 2016 08: 43
          +1
          They are businessmen, therefore, the invested money should work for the benefit of the investor. Thus, the U.S. Amy develops and expands the zone of influence, namely, if it is not safe anywhere in the world to put money in the safest place in offshore US banks. The complication of relations with China will allow squeezing out production and money and return it to the United States.
        2. The comment was deleted.
      2. Delink
        Delink 19 May 2016 07: 13
        +1
        Yes yes seagulls around
        1. Starover_Z
          Starover_Z 19 May 2016 08: 12
          +3
          Quote: Delink
          Yes yes seagulls around

          And seagulls fly over their ships, is it not dangerous for ships ?!
          Maybe it's time to warn the seagulls ?!
          It’s a pity that cows do not fly over their ships!
          1. Enot-poloskun
            Enot-poloskun 19 May 2016 08: 44
            0
            A seagull can poop on the deck))) FAB-500)) -
    3. Karasik
      Karasik 19 May 2016 06: 31
      +3
      "... One gets the impression that the US military over the past decades has clearly managed to get used to the greenhouse conditions of service."
      Does anyone else believe that the unipolar world, in which the only "hegemon" of the United States, still exists? They are still being "lowered", so me-a-a-genko. Soon they will start beating.
      1. kodxnumx
        kodxnumx 19 May 2016 06: 43
        +2
        It’s just that the USA makes it clear that they are not in the second place!
        1. Thunderbolt
          Thunderbolt 19 May 2016 07: 06
          +1
          Quote: Simon
          the safest thing for their military equipment is to stand aircraft in hangars
          or with a traveling exhibition-big top to demonstrate the power of their Air Force in the squares of Beijing. wassat
    4. maks-101
      maks-101 19 May 2016 07: 47
      +1
      Maybe they want to be pitied, so we didn’t do anything, but the Russians offended us the Chinese, and we are good. In a word, pi.
    5. Sly
      Sly 19 May 2016 08: 07
      +2
      in the USA on the eve declared the possibility of a “collision with a seagull" of the Russian Su-24


      With the same success, we could say that there was a possibility of a collision of “Donald Cook” with an anti-submarine mine during World War II
  2. Thunderbolt
    Thunderbolt 19 May 2016 06: 23
    +6
    The Chinese can and will fill up. History remembers all the combat episodes when the Chinese pilots fought back American intelligence officers. And some of these cases were not just "unsafe", but also shot down the Pentagon hawks. China has nowhere to go and it will maximize its military presence in the coastal waters under the cover of ground-based missile batteries and aviation. And their missiles are becoming more and more long-range, and it is even indecent to talk about the number when it comes to China (especially since they try to keep many lines secret)
  3. Riv
    Riv 19 May 2016 06: 23
    +18
    The Yankees are right, you can't argue. A "safe" intercept is when a scout is knocked out by an interceptor from a safe distance. And here both "unsafe" and "unprofessional" - because he did not knock him down.
  4. Ayujak
    Ayujak 19 May 2016 06: 25
    +2
    Well, the Americans ... Of course, do not approach them. They have very delicate equipment. laughing And very expensive to the same. So many problems they have ... laughing
    1. dmi.pris
      dmi.pris 19 May 2016 06: 30
      +2
      The equipment is tender? Rather asses .. I have to get used to it.
      Quote: AYUJAK
      Well, the Americans ... Of course, do not approach them. They have very delicate equipment. laughing And very expensive to the same. So many problems they have ... laughing
    2. avva2012
      avva2012 19 May 2016 06: 35
      +3
      Quote: AYUJAK Well, the Americans ... Of course, do not approach them.

      Joking as a joke, but if it goes that way, it will soon come close to them, not comme il faut, so to speak. laughing There, they have a new unconventional chief of ground forces. If reforms reach the Air Force ...
      1. Kos_kalinki9
        Kos_kalinki9 19 May 2016 06: 49
        +5
        There, they have a new unconventional chief of ground forces. If reforms reach the Air Force ...

        That, their planes forward jo ... sorry, will they start to fly ???
        1. avva2012
          avva2012 19 May 2016 07: 13
          0
          Well, if those that fly on planes, then the plane will also be considered to be wrong, as it is. So, to shoot down only from afar, otherwise you never know what.
      2. Delink
        Delink 19 May 2016 07: 17
        +1
        If reforms reach the Air Force ...

        If so, then perhaps the planes will start approaching the enemy backwards in order to quickly dump them from an unprofessional "capture". wassat
      3. Katman
        Katman 19 May 2016 09: 56
        0
        What is the name of the new chief of the ground forces. And where does the US aviation? But the new US Air Force Minister is Deborah Lee James. Woman. And I did not see any gay or transvestite direction. Quite a pretty woman. But! A woman with weapons, and even the Air Force, and if Clinton comes to power. That's it, 3,14ts. Amazons, m ... yours.
    3. kartalovkolya
      kartalovkolya 19 May 2016 08: 46
      +2
      And there is no need to hang out at foreign borders, then there will be a "safe interception"! Ours do not "cry" even when NATO members "intercepted" the plane of our Kozhugetovech, but I think if something happened they would have shot down every single one without yelling and snot!
  5. DIMA45R
    DIMA45R 19 May 2016 06: 25
    +3
    Launch a rocket at these pins and so that it explodes about ten to twenty meters in front of the plane, and call it a warning shot, so that they will kiss.
    It is unsafe to fly near the borders of others, to sit safely and professionally at home and not flattery on the rampage.
    1. kotvov
      kotvov 19 May 2016 11: 31
      0
      Launch a rocket at these pins and so that it explodes about ten to twenty meters in front of the plane,
      learn military affairs respected, and then joke like that.
  6. amirbek
    amirbek 19 May 2016 06: 27
    +2
    Chinese Air Force fighter intercepted

    show solidarity what
  7. 1vlad19
    1vlad19 19 May 2016 06: 28
    +5
    Where do poor Americans go ... On the Black and Baltic Seas, Russians intercept. in South China Chinese ... Can sit at the pier and not croak?
  8. avva2012
    avva2012 19 May 2016 06: 29
    +4
    Do not fucking fly where you are not asked. And then it happens, and unprofessional shooting down, and then professional bailout (if you're lucky).
    The USA felt like Mike Tyson in a kindergarten for a long time. Relaxed.
    1. Karasik
      Karasik 19 May 2016 06: 34
      +3
      Quote: avva2012
      The USA felt like Mike Tyson in a kindergarten for a long time. Relaxed.

      Mike Tyson in kindergarten ... - well said!
  9. BARKAS
    BARKAS 19 May 2016 06: 32
    +2
    Recall that in the United States on the eve of the possibility of “collision with a seagull” of the Russian Su-24,

    Russian rights of gulls are not respected, which means that there will be new sanctions!
    1. alex-cn
      alex-cn 19 May 2016 06: 38
      +3
      And since the Chinese have a favorite national "bird" dragon, what will happen from a collision with him? recourse
  10. Holsten
    Holsten 19 May 2016 06: 36
    +5
    Like children, straight out: It's not fair, not fair! .. And these are military pilots? But if you imagine a picture of how, after completing a flight, a "military" pilot puts on tights, high-heeled shoes and goes to a bar in the evening to drink beer and share his impressions "about these nasty" ones, then everything falls into place.
  11. Sergerius
    Sergerius 19 May 2016 06: 38
    +1
    Poor mattresses crying everywhere they are oppressed, offended, and their own budget is cut back laughing where the poor go.
  12. K-50
    K-50 19 May 2016 06: 42
    +2
    It is noteworthy that in the Pentagon, as in the case of the interception of US Air Force reconnaissance aircraft by Russian fighters, the interception by Chinese aircraft was called "unsafe."

    We would sit at home, gorging popcorn and would not care about such events. request yes
  13. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 19 May 2016 06: 44
    +2
    As soon as an American or other NATO aircraft is intercepted, it is not immediately safe, not professional. Accustomed to flying around the world without consequences, feeling like masters. Nothing, they will get used to it and in the future they will not express themselves so "offensively".
  14. brasist
    brasist 19 May 2016 07: 02
    +2
    Mom to son:
    - Harry again flew into an unsafe zone, telling you to use diapers, go and wash yourself well, and then there is nothing to breathe.
  15. Flinky
    Flinky 19 May 2016 07: 04
    0
    Who is interested in the opinion of geometric figures?
  16. Taygerus
    Taygerus 19 May 2016 07: 11
    +2
    again rainbow pilots are not so intercepted
  17. nivander
    nivander 19 May 2016 07: 18
    +3
    By the way, Americans \ British \ Canadians and other satellites when flying our (even civilian) planes near their military facilities arrange a loud and snotty hysteria in the media
  18. andr327
    andr327 19 May 2016 07: 18
    +1
    but what’s interesting is why recently have the Americans reconnaissance planes scattered or are there already not enough space components?
    If so, then a pleasant fact! Not enough Russian engines appear!
  19. Stinger
    Stinger 19 May 2016 07: 22
    +2
    Not only not safe. I would say cheeky. It was necessary to turn to the State Department: Kindly, please excuse me, could you allow me to fly up to your dendrolet, which is marking our borders, so that your pilots don’t put on their pants?
  20. Alexdark
    Alexdark 19 May 2016 07: 24
    +2
    Their carbon copy statements fool
  21. gg.na
    gg.na 19 May 2016 07: 31
    +1
    Themselves in matters of intercepting bummers and ignoramuses so it’s not necessary to equal everyone on their own, lol nepusam!
  22. Russia
    Russia 19 May 2016 07: 39
    +4
    The presence of the Pentagon itself is unsafe for the World!
    Interestingly, and are the birds flying over him?
  23. Obolensky
    Obolensky 19 May 2016 08: 07
    +3
    They are strange, right. Why can't you get close to their ships and planes? Or do each of them have diplomatic immunity? That way they will soon come to the point that they will forbid the rest to approach their shells. And then even more - ships and planes will be banned altogether. What do you! This is not safe! Ugh...

    In general, jokes aside! For-dol-ba-li. Reading the statistics, I realized that there used to be precedents for shooting down aircraft for sure. And the Chinese were shot down, and they were shot down. Both Americans and them. Both we and ours. Everything was. The Americans really relaxed at the expense of others.
  24. Max repp
    Max repp 19 May 2016 08: 12
    +1
    It seems to me, or I already heard it somewhere =)
  25. KRIG55
    KRIG55 19 May 2016 08: 20
    +4
    You must fly at home and not spy on the whole world and you will have safe flights.
  26. tomatokin
    tomatokin 19 May 2016 08: 27
    +4
    Do not hell to fly and swim, where it is not necessary and u will be ok !!! good yes hi
  27. FID
    FID 19 May 2016 08: 28
    0
    Well, no one wrote why ours do not claim dangerous maneuvers, etc., etc. .... Either we have no scouts (Tu-214 No.№ 64511, 64514), or all the rest m ... ki!
    1. kotvov
      kotvov 19 May 2016 11: 34
      0
      Well, no one wrote why ours do not claim dangerous maneuvers, etc., etc. .... Either we do not have scouts (Tu-214 No.№ 64511, 64514), or all the other m ... ki !,
      it’s just that our people are soberly assessing the situation, and not hysterical, like young ladies.
  28. Ruswolf
    Ruswolf 19 May 2016 09: 23
    0
    Lord And then where to know what is dangerous and what is not!
    How do you know about the danger to those who are used to bombing defenseless, peaceful cities, hospitals and watering Vietnamese with napalm and pesticides.
    Rear Admiral Vladimir Bogdashev (the one who rammed the Americans in the Black Sea in 1988) correctly said that Americans are good guys, quick-witted .... when you click on their nose!
    So that they do not forget those days:
    According to foreign sources, after the incident, Yorktown was repaired at a shipyard for several months. The cruiser commander was removed from his post for passive actions and the initiative given to the Soviet ship, thereby causing moral damage to the prestige of the American Navy. The US Congress froze the budget for the naval department for almost half a year.


    This is definitely unsafe! .... For them!
  29. sergey2017
    sergey2017 19 May 2016 09: 28
    +2
    All assessments by "professionals" from the Pentagon, as always, boil down to their exclusiveness to assess the actions of military pilots of other countries intercepting US Air Force planes! The Pentagon is well aware that their era of superiority and exclusivity is now reduced to zero! So they are worried that not only our planes have begun to intercept them! The States are frightened by such a tendency to confront their exclusivity!
  30. iliya87
    iliya87 19 May 2016 09: 29
    +2
    Not much time will pass and no one will pay attention to these statements at all, sayings are sucks. Fly off your coast and scout crabs and there will be no interceptions!
  31. triglav
    triglav 19 May 2016 09: 38
    +2
    Like in the movie: American Stinkers. That's all. Do they think that they will be everywhere and always with impunity? Will not work!
  32. The comment was deleted.
  33. red_october
    red_october 19 May 2016 10: 26
    0
    "Recall that the United States announced on the eve of the possibility of a" collision with a seagull "Russian Su-24"

    Russian gulls - they know what harmful animals. They can also get into the engine nozzle of an American aircraft, a scout, or any other flying in 40 miles from the Russian borders ...
  34. The comment was deleted.
  35. Bulrumeb
    Bulrumeb 19 May 2016 11: 30
    +1
    as in the case of the interception of US Air Force reconnaissance aircraft by Russian fighters, the interception by Chinese aircraft was called "unsafe."

    that’s how evil these Russians and Chinese offend the mattresses. But there are also seagulls ....
  36. Lester7777
    Lester7777 19 May 2016 12: 28
    +1
    Curiously, what criteria is used to distinguish "unsafe" interception from "safe"? Powers was safely intercepted in 60, or not?
  37. sinoptic
    sinoptic 19 May 2016 14: 09
    +1
    Quote: red_october
    Recall that in the United States on the eve of the possibility of “collision with a seagull” of the Russian Su-24

    It was necessary to declare the possibility of a collision with a sperm whale American destroyer.