How we were beautifully lit on Euro-Ukrainian Tatar
If that - yes, I'm on the results of "Eurovision". But not about the ones you thought about. I, frankly, absolutely do not care (if not to say more abruptly) who won there. And what. The fact that this is the "Eurovision" can only show that the one who pays is the one who orders the music, clearly as half a liter on Friday evening.
However, in my results, not that half a liter is enough, validol is needed in decent sizes.
A couple of questions to begin with.
Someone doubted that the one who should win would win? Someone doubted that the winner will be determined in Brussels and Washington? Someone doubted that the winner would not be a representative of Russia, even if he was a genius howling with plywood from birth?
If you answered yes to all three questions, do not read further. There is no meaning. One waste of time.
The fact that our "partners" use every opportunity to try once again, if not to bite, or at least pinch us, is understandable.
But most of all, the reaction in our camp caused the “deep concern”.
You can talk for a long time about how politically motivated the first place of this Jamila was with a song about the genocide of the Crimean Tatars and how much Jamila was generally like a singer. You can discuss the "mistakes" of the Europeans who put the wrong score on the wrong participant. Well, yes, they are there, in Europe, that Australia, that Ukraine ...
It is possible, but not necessary. This is already passed stage. I was more outraged by the public reaction to the fact of this political Euro-fair under the flag of a music competition.
But howl and poured by the so-called "Russian patriots" seriously. Not buckets, tanks. They began to remember everything and massively in relation to the Crimean Tatars. It is easier to list where the patriotic howl did not happen on this topic. Classically, with foaming at the mouth and other attributes. But we are reasonable people, so let's calmly argue.
Go to social networks, admire. The stories about how the Crimean Tatars collaborated with the Nazis and what crimes they did were not one. The impression that someone somewhere waved a conductor's baton, and the orchestra began to play. Howling in the sense. The Tatars are such, the Tatars are Syas, with them as people, and they served the Nazis, it was necessary to have everyone else in 1945 in the sea in a crowd, and so on.
And, like a resume, type deportation was generally a blessing for them. Undeserved. And today the same genes work.
But here the good question is: do we have someone's genes earned? And from what? Who was so offended by the fact that the “Eurovisions” candy from some Tom Neuvirta, Conchita Wurst, was not given to Lazarus?
And what does the Tatars have to do with it all?
It turns out that a huge part of people today in Russia is prone to some kind of economy of mental effort. Purely on the emotions come up. And if someone thought out in advance and shouted loudly - in general lepotas. There is no need to think, put likes and wheezing by a rabid dog, dropping foam on the keyboard. Let it means that these Tatars know that we are here, do not forget and do not forgive. As is, Pavlov's dogs.
Who benefits?
It was not invented by me, but in the 2014 year, Putin said that the interests of Russia were that the Crimean Tatars were satisfied and loyal citizens of the country, had good relations with other citizens and all lived together in good neighborliness and peace.
And then who benefits from this relationship as bad as possible? So that the Crimean Tatars have as many insults to Russia as a whole and its citizens in particular and by name? Probably those who find it convenient to use to destabilize the situation in the Crimea.
The list, by the way, is not very long. And has long been known.
Then forgive, for whom those who compare the Crimean Tatars of seventy years ago and modern shout today? Yes, and blames, or rather, accuses of collaborationism? With conclusions and appeals?
Speaking of collaboration, or, to put it more simply, betrayal.
Traitors were, are and will be in every nation. Everyone has their own, with their own motivation. And among the Tatars, and among the Russians, and among the Ukrainians. But each case must be treated with attention and considered personally. And to punish a traitor, and not the whole people. Because we can also show the same Lyushkov, Vlasov, Rezun, Belenko, Makarov-Ginzburg, and in general, for his history we have collected such a herbarium of freaks that no other people would have dreamed of.
Is any of us guilty of the atrocities of Vlasovites from the POA? It seems not. And there, I will note, there were most Russians. And is today's Camil Baibekov responsible for the acts of Dzhelal Abdureshidov in the distant 1942 year? If by analogy with the Vlasovites, then none.
A person can only be guilty as a result of his personal actions or inaction. To expose a person guilty only because of his belonging to an ethnic group ... You know, this is not fascism. This is frank idiocy plus reflexes developed by social networks.
Pay attention to how we, Russian, diligently slowly poisoned on the others. Ukrainians are all Bandera and traitors. The Germans were served. Tatars are also traitors, they also served the Germans. You know, so far you can go? And then, most interestingly, puzzled questions begin: why doesn’t anyone like us, Russians? And no one breaks into allies?
Yeah, you go allies today, tomorrow will be another question. Slovaks, Serbs, Bulgarians, Montenegrins have long ceased to be "bratushkami"? Actually, they have not ceased, but our attitude has already changed, and this is clearly seen from the comments. Your, dear readers, comments. You can prove to any Slav from abroad in two accounts that he is from the crowd of traitors. Watched more than once.
And everything seems to be so simple and understandable. Man is responsible for his actions. In front of people. Before the people. This is logical and even legal. But writing an entire nation as a traitor, because of his number were the same collaborators ... Yes, and also to call for repentance ...
Although, stop.
Familiar note. Somewhere it already was, and it was not once. Remind me, if I am mistaken, whom have we constantly been called upon to repent? Moreover, it is public?
We were called. Russian. Tatar Udmurtov. Avarians. Who called? Who blamed all mortal sins? It is clear that all these Yeltsin, Nemtsov, Kasparov are dolls. Puppets there ... away. In the dark.
And today, as practice shows, the action of driving in wedges is quite successful. And few of the growling patriotic patriots think about it. To think, as the same practice shows, is a bit stressful for modern brains.
And even worse, when they begin to cultivate such a hereditary hatred. When they drive into our minds that we are not neighbors, not friends, not brothers, but our very enemies, almost from the creation of the world.
Those Tatars who served the Germans are no longer in this world. And why today the wholesale wine is transferred to their great-grandchildren due to the fact that a single girl on behalf of Ukraine slept a song about innocently murdered ancestors, is not entirely clear to me personally. But it is very clear who is at hand.
It is foolish to lay collective guilt on a whole nation for the actions of its individual representatives. Historically proven. It is also foolish to present accounts and demand some kind of repentance, for everything that is being said today rests mainly in the earth. It is necessary to live on the basis of today's interests, and not to sacrifice to the past those interests, guided by which you can live peacefully and fruitfully for decades in the future.
And mutual historical claims should be left to those who are no longer capable of anything. The best example is our Baltic neighbors. Which quite often refer publicly to this topic. We, unlike them, understand who benefits the essence of the claims. And therefore in no case should not be like those who are twitching in time with the puppeteers.
However, in my results, not that half a liter is enough, validol is needed in decent sizes.
A couple of questions to begin with.
Someone doubted that the one who should win would win? Someone doubted that the winner will be determined in Brussels and Washington? Someone doubted that the winner would not be a representative of Russia, even if he was a genius howling with plywood from birth?
If you answered yes to all three questions, do not read further. There is no meaning. One waste of time.
The fact that our "partners" use every opportunity to try once again, if not to bite, or at least pinch us, is understandable.
But most of all, the reaction in our camp caused the “deep concern”.
You can talk for a long time about how politically motivated the first place of this Jamila was with a song about the genocide of the Crimean Tatars and how much Jamila was generally like a singer. You can discuss the "mistakes" of the Europeans who put the wrong score on the wrong participant. Well, yes, they are there, in Europe, that Australia, that Ukraine ...
It is possible, but not necessary. This is already passed stage. I was more outraged by the public reaction to the fact of this political Euro-fair under the flag of a music competition.
But howl and poured by the so-called "Russian patriots" seriously. Not buckets, tanks. They began to remember everything and massively in relation to the Crimean Tatars. It is easier to list where the patriotic howl did not happen on this topic. Classically, with foaming at the mouth and other attributes. But we are reasonable people, so let's calmly argue.
Go to social networks, admire. The stories about how the Crimean Tatars collaborated with the Nazis and what crimes they did were not one. The impression that someone somewhere waved a conductor's baton, and the orchestra began to play. Howling in the sense. The Tatars are such, the Tatars are Syas, with them as people, and they served the Nazis, it was necessary to have everyone else in 1945 in the sea in a crowd, and so on.
And, like a resume, type deportation was generally a blessing for them. Undeserved. And today the same genes work.
But here the good question is: do we have someone's genes earned? And from what? Who was so offended by the fact that the “Eurovisions” candy from some Tom Neuvirta, Conchita Wurst, was not given to Lazarus?
And what does the Tatars have to do with it all?
It turns out that a huge part of people today in Russia is prone to some kind of economy of mental effort. Purely on the emotions come up. And if someone thought out in advance and shouted loudly - in general lepotas. There is no need to think, put likes and wheezing by a rabid dog, dropping foam on the keyboard. Let it means that these Tatars know that we are here, do not forget and do not forgive. As is, Pavlov's dogs.
Who benefits?
It was not invented by me, but in the 2014 year, Putin said that the interests of Russia were that the Crimean Tatars were satisfied and loyal citizens of the country, had good relations with other citizens and all lived together in good neighborliness and peace.
And then who benefits from this relationship as bad as possible? So that the Crimean Tatars have as many insults to Russia as a whole and its citizens in particular and by name? Probably those who find it convenient to use to destabilize the situation in the Crimea.
The list, by the way, is not very long. And has long been known.
Then forgive, for whom those who compare the Crimean Tatars of seventy years ago and modern shout today? Yes, and blames, or rather, accuses of collaborationism? With conclusions and appeals?
Speaking of collaboration, or, to put it more simply, betrayal.
Traitors were, are and will be in every nation. Everyone has their own, with their own motivation. And among the Tatars, and among the Russians, and among the Ukrainians. But each case must be treated with attention and considered personally. And to punish a traitor, and not the whole people. Because we can also show the same Lyushkov, Vlasov, Rezun, Belenko, Makarov-Ginzburg, and in general, for his history we have collected such a herbarium of freaks that no other people would have dreamed of.
Is any of us guilty of the atrocities of Vlasovites from the POA? It seems not. And there, I will note, there were most Russians. And is today's Camil Baibekov responsible for the acts of Dzhelal Abdureshidov in the distant 1942 year? If by analogy with the Vlasovites, then none.
A person can only be guilty as a result of his personal actions or inaction. To expose a person guilty only because of his belonging to an ethnic group ... You know, this is not fascism. This is frank idiocy plus reflexes developed by social networks.
Pay attention to how we, Russian, diligently slowly poisoned on the others. Ukrainians are all Bandera and traitors. The Germans were served. Tatars are also traitors, they also served the Germans. You know, so far you can go? And then, most interestingly, puzzled questions begin: why doesn’t anyone like us, Russians? And no one breaks into allies?
Yeah, you go allies today, tomorrow will be another question. Slovaks, Serbs, Bulgarians, Montenegrins have long ceased to be "bratushkami"? Actually, they have not ceased, but our attitude has already changed, and this is clearly seen from the comments. Your, dear readers, comments. You can prove to any Slav from abroad in two accounts that he is from the crowd of traitors. Watched more than once.
And everything seems to be so simple and understandable. Man is responsible for his actions. In front of people. Before the people. This is logical and even legal. But writing an entire nation as a traitor, because of his number were the same collaborators ... Yes, and also to call for repentance ...
Although, stop.
Familiar note. Somewhere it already was, and it was not once. Remind me, if I am mistaken, whom have we constantly been called upon to repent? Moreover, it is public?
We were called. Russian. Tatar Udmurtov. Avarians. Who called? Who blamed all mortal sins? It is clear that all these Yeltsin, Nemtsov, Kasparov are dolls. Puppets there ... away. In the dark.
And today, as practice shows, the action of driving in wedges is quite successful. And few of the growling patriotic patriots think about it. To think, as the same practice shows, is a bit stressful for modern brains.
And even worse, when they begin to cultivate such a hereditary hatred. When they drive into our minds that we are not neighbors, not friends, not brothers, but our very enemies, almost from the creation of the world.
Those Tatars who served the Germans are no longer in this world. And why today the wholesale wine is transferred to their great-grandchildren due to the fact that a single girl on behalf of Ukraine slept a song about innocently murdered ancestors, is not entirely clear to me personally. But it is very clear who is at hand.
It is foolish to lay collective guilt on a whole nation for the actions of its individual representatives. Historically proven. It is also foolish to present accounts and demand some kind of repentance, for everything that is being said today rests mainly in the earth. It is necessary to live on the basis of today's interests, and not to sacrifice to the past those interests, guided by which you can live peacefully and fruitfully for decades in the future.
And mutual historical claims should be left to those who are no longer capable of anything. The best example is our Baltic neighbors. Which quite often refer publicly to this topic. We, unlike them, understand who benefits the essence of the claims. And therefore in no case should not be like those who are twitching in time with the puppeteers.
Information