Military Review

Estonian defense ministry: want NATO heavy equipment to be near state borders

54
Heavy equipment of the allied states should be located no further than one thousand miles from the border of Estonia, reports RIA News Statement by the Minister of Defense of the Republic Hannes Hanso.




“We want the Allied heavy equipment to be constantly located no more than a thousand miles away. For our part, we, together with Latvia and Lithuania, are working to provide allied units and their equipment with a simplified mode of movement across state borders, and also to offer them good support from the host country. ”
- said the Minister in Tallinn at a security conference.

According to him, “a speedy improvement in the security situation in the Baltic region is not expected, and the upcoming NATO summit in Warsaw must decide on the increase in the alliance’s forces on its eastern borders.”

Hanso said: "The Council at the NATO summit is clear: our region needs a large Allied force."

Within the framework of the conference, he also discussed cooperation issues and preparations for the July NATO summit with distinguished guests from the United States.
Photos used:
vegchel.ru
54 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Finches
    Finches 16 May 2016 10: 23
    +38
    It seems to be not good to talk like that, as if about an "independent" state, but facts are a stubborn thing! - All my life were bedding! Russia pulled them out from under one place - clothed them, fed them, taught them, gave them work, helped build everything, protected them from fascism ..., but it could not eliminate the cravings for bedding ...!
    1. oleg-gr
      oleg-gr 16 May 2016 10: 25
      +2
      Patients in ward number 6 rest compared with such statements. Why not fill an artificial island in the Baltic Sea? Eureks do not give? For experience, let them turn to the descendants of the great Ukrov.
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 16 May 2016 10: 36
        +11
        "Estonian Defense Ministry: We want NATO heavy equipment to be close to the borders of the state" We want the Allies' heavy equipment to be constantly no more than a thousand miles from us.
        And how should this help Estonia if something happens? Let's imagine. Russian troops received orders to seize the Baltic states. How much time does it take? An hour! And more than one port and an airfield will not be able to receive transport. Or does someone think that that contingent is a warrior that now in the Baltic states will like in films smeared with blood, dirt keep the defense? laughing There remains an amphibious landing. Nu-nu. By the way, a referendum will be uncovered and will be gathered. laughingThe very existence of the Baltic states depends entirely on Russia's unwillingness to feed parasites!
        1. Altona
          Altona 16 May 2016 11: 25
          +1
          Quote: Observer2014
          And how, if something should help Estonia? Let’s fantasize. Russian troops received orders to seize the Baltic states. How much time is needed? Hour! And more than one port and an airfield will not be able to receive transport. Or does someone think that that contingent is a warrior that now in the Baltic states will like in films smeared with blood, dirt keep the defense? laughing Remains the landing. Nu-nu. Until the cover and the referendum are already going to be held laughing The very existence of the Baltic depends entirely on Russia's unwillingness to feed the parasites!

          -------------------------
          Everything you described was around WWII. The British easily shot a massive German landing party trying to land on Crete. The "brave" Finns did not dare to attack the USSR in Karelia, the tanks would have gone far from the supply bases, they would have disappeared in the tundra, and in 1944 they turned down the Nazi shop altogether. Let them bring in more tanks, they will need a sea of ​​fuel, because the Abrams eats it much more than what is stated in the passport. In general, this whole armada will devour itself. As for airfields and ports, the runways and radar equipment will be mutilated with a few shots. Also, the cyber center in Estonia, ports in Tallinn and Ventspils will be covered. In general, Labuses are so funny in their military attempts.
          1. Tatyana
            Tatyana 16 May 2016 11: 32
            +5
            Finches
            It seems to be not good to talk like that, as if about an "independent" state, but facts are a stubborn thing! - All my life were bedding! Russia pulled them out from under one place - clothed them, fed them, taught them, gave them work, helped build everything, protected them from fascism ..., but it could not eliminate the cravings for bedding ...!
            On this occasion, Igor Korotchenko, in a discussion with representatives of the Baltic countries and Ukraine, answered them perfectly to their insolent attacks on the so-called. "occupation" of the Baltic countries by the USSR / Russia!

            See "This is what Korotchenko replied to the Ukram and the Balts for" Occupation ". Published: May 13, 2016
            An excerpt from the TV show "Meeting Place" on NTV.
            1. Tatyana
              Tatyana 16 May 2016 13: 33
              0
              But what happened, for example, in Lithuania before its voluntary entry into the USSR.
              For example, Lithuanian Ruta Vanagaite wrote about the "DOUBLE" JEWISH Holocaust in Lithuania during WWII in her book "Mūsiškiai" ("Ours").
              In all of Lithuania there were about 50 Jewish houses, plus synagogues, shops, hospitals. Where did all this property go? All Lithuania became rich.
              The social portrait of the murderer of the Jews - HALF those who killed in the PROVINCE - illiterate or simple village boys who graduated from two classes who volunteered for the Lithuanian army.
              Young, illiterate Lithuanians in a sober state so respectfully killed the Jews that they were taken to Lithuania for DESTRUCTION from OTHER countries.
              In CITIES, schoolchildren of 16-17 years old voluntarily participated in the killings, and the Church indifferently watched the Holocaust - even murdered the murderers of sins.
              They went to kill themselves for nothing to do. Then there was such logic: they gave me food and shoot. And you can take clothes, shoes, chains of Jews, drink. The killers of the Jews usually did not pay anything, they took what they could, carried to sell or traded for vodka. It was their reward. In the evening they returned home. Some had children — they didn’t come empty-handed from work — they brought them either clothes or something else.
              Maybe if the Church took a different position or said that it was necessary to fulfill one of the commandments of God - maybe that would stop them. But the Church kept silent or did not call.
              See “Relatives and friends turned their backs on the book about the genocide of Jews in Lithuania” -
              http://nnm.me/blogs/cfvxfncrbq/iz-za-knigi-o-genocide-evreev-v-litve-ot-avtora-o
              tvernulis-rodnye-i-druzya /
              The Baltic countries in their arrogant Russophobia are clearly dropping to the same pre-war national fascist racist level - now with respect to the Russians!
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. Stranger03
          Stranger03 16 May 2016 11: 45
          +2
          Not, 1000 miles, it's about 1800 miles. This is the distance from Moscow to Yekaterinburg (2000 km). If you place troops at such a distance from the borders, then they should be somewhere in the area of ​​Berlin or even Paris, laughing
          1. wasjasibirjac
            wasjasibirjac 16 May 2016 12: 35
            0
            Quote: Stranger03
            . If you deploy troops at such a distance from the borders, they should be somewhere in the area of ​​Berlin or even Paris,
            say too. German and French tavernas already stand near Berlin and Paris. and this type wants to drown more armored vehicles in the Baltic Sea. and demands from the US and NATO hostages, no less than a battalion, in each Tribaltic "country"
            1. g1v2
              g1v2 16 May 2016 14: 04
              0
              German and French tanks are not very threatening to us at the moment - they didn’t even go to Iraq with mattresses, and they certainly do not want to fight with us. The mattresses have just 2400 tanks for army units and ng (of which some are in storage) and 6719 Bradley infantry fighting vehicles. That's all their heavy weapons scattered over numerous bases. There are up to 16 thousand strikers and other armored personnel carriers and armored vehicles in striker brigades and light brigades. And it's all. That is all at all.
              We only have about 3 thousand tanks and 10 thousand in storage in service, plus up to 450 - 500 tanks in the nm corps in the Donbass. The mattresses didn’t scare me much with their heavy equipment. hi
        4. Aleksander
          Aleksander 16 May 2016 11: 47
          +2
          Quote: Observer2014
          "Estonian Defense Ministry: We want NATO heavy equipment to be close to the borders of the state" We want the Allies' heavy equipment to be constantly no more than a thousand miles from us.


          No need to figure anything out: tanks at a distance THOUSAND miles from Estonia is a former border of Germany and East Germany and this is a GREAT offer for Russia! good
          PS A fellow-suggestion, just d..k .... fool
      2. Major Yurik
        Major Yurik 16 May 2016 10: 46
        +1
        The Baltic states for this will cast medals for blacks from the Yankesian elite special forces: -Death in the battle for the independence of the Baltic! Straight everyone will rush to defend them without sparing a striped ass. Old tanks will be thrown, for their own money, well, good. fool
    2. Stalker.1977
      Stalker.1977 16 May 2016 10: 37
      +2
      Damn how they are afraid, but they can’t work out of fear, all the plants have collapsed, the gdp has fallen several times, poor people, you need to treat you with haloperidol, you look and become normal. laughing
    3. Kirill750
      Kirill750 16 May 2016 10: 52
      0
      this craving it is in blood and genes look at zapadentsev the same thing no need to waste strength let creeps WHIRLS one diagnosis
    4. Kirill750
      Kirill750 16 May 2016 10: 56
      0
      this craving it is in blood and genes look at zapadentsev the same thing no need to waste strength let creeps WHIRLS one diagnosis
    5. WKS
      WKS 16 May 2016 11: 01
      +1
      As they once said in Odessa: "Don't tell my braces", these territories have never been independent in History. Why did they suddenly get formal independence, they had to actually become like that? The actual independence of the state is acquired by centuries of struggle with greedy neighbors. And here there were actually no states.
    6. Bobxnumx
      Bobxnumx 16 May 2016 11: 25
      +1
      Apparently they liked how the NATO soldiers drank, committed atrocities and filed in their country. winked Deflection and lysis will not be replaced anyway.
      1. Thunderbolt
        Thunderbolt 16 May 2016 12: 59
        +2
        Many people here do not understand and are indignant: why do the Baltic politicians constantly talk about the threat from the East, willingly provide their bases and training grounds for their "senior comrades", after all, we are not going to attack them (and if we did, we would get paranoid In a word, their futile attempts are pitiful and insignificant. On the contrary, I believe that NATO is concentrating in the Baltics not for deterrence and defense, but for deployment and attack! Transit point. This is a long-term strategy stretched out over decades, and not spontaneous reaction to events in Crimea and Donbass.
      2. Bobxnumx
        Bobxnumx 16 May 2016 13: 08
        +1
        I apologize for the error - they did not file, but SAD.
  2. Pereira
    Pereira 16 May 2016 10: 25
    +10
    Thousand miles? Is it at the bottom of the Atlantic? I'm not against.
    1. Nevsky_ZU
      Nevsky_ZU 16 May 2016 10: 27
      +3
      Quote: Pereira
      Thousand miles? Is it at the bottom of the Atlantic? I'm not against.


      The usual and typical Americanism in the answers of the sixes, who do not bother themselves with logic and adequacy. It remains for them to say: “We want 10 Bruce Willis, three Stalone-Rambaud, etc. Clip and cinematic thinking.
      1. Moore
        Moore 16 May 2016 11: 40
        0
        And here I see some kind of farm cunning.
        No need to say: our dear allies, we want your storage depots with tanks and other gizmos on our land so much that we can’t eat putra with black peas and zeppelins!
        But no - some distances are calculated. After all, there is a lot of iron and people to it - it's not only money for the treasury from taxes from restaurateurs and girls. This is also a lot of troubles from guests in the form of spoiled ecology, conflicts with locals and other "gingerbread" from serving the occupation troops.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. The comment was deleted.
  3. Aleksandr12
    Aleksandr12 16 May 2016 10: 27
    +6
    1000 miles from Estonia, it's somewhere in France and England. Let these heavy weapons have. It makes us neither hot nor cold. At such a distance, even though they have a tank division, let them protect the Baltic states.
    1. voyaka uh
      voyaka uh 16 May 2016 12: 11
      +4
      Americans already have heavy equipment depots in Norway.
      There they are in the rocks, where it is difficult to bomb.
      But they still will not have time to transfer them to Estonia in case of something.
      Here you need complete dominance in the air, which is not easy to achieve
      near the Russian borders.
      In Germany or western Poland will have time to transfer the maximum.
      1. Observer2014
        Observer2014 16 May 2016 14: 06
        +1
        voyaka uh

        That case when I agree with you. In the event of a war for the Baltic states (I emphasize it's just a fantasy), NATO or a large group must be kept there. Or create an imitation of what they will fight for the Baltic States. For in the current scenario, NATO has only one thing left, naval or airborne landing ( There will be no ports or airdromes in the first hour) But it is not possible to carry out a quick landing operation without trying to suppress air defense systems and anti-ship systems in Russia. And any strike on Russian territory is a response to the entire depth of the territory of all NATO members. That is the 3rd world. So this is utopia. No one in the world for the Baltic states wants to die. And the only thing that remains is to console the Baltic states that everything will be fine laughingMake an imitation of military support. And to make the Baltic States remind themselves of less. Otherwise, everything will be done very quickly. The only thing that holds Russia back from a just desire to repay the Baltic States for its behavior is how I printed above not a desire to feed the parasites.
      2. sharp-lad
        sharp-lad 16 May 2016 14: 36
        0
        Hit the exits, dig out torment! hi
  4. beer-youk
    beer-youk 16 May 2016 10: 28
    +3
    The meaning of this promise is its complete nonsense. A thousand miles, heavy equipment, simplified border crossing. Some delirium of a stoned drunk.
  5. Londa
    Londa 16 May 2016 10: 29
    +1
    It will not save, you are our cowardly.
  6. evil partisan
    evil partisan 16 May 2016 10: 33
    +3
    And the go-o-hordes-e-e-ests are aware that with the explosion of the BC the tank’s tower can fly off oooo far sad . And not to the territory of the enemy nifig request ...
  7. Dmitry Potapov
    Dmitry Potapov 16 May 2016 10: 45
    +2
    Yes, yes, as wise Kaa said, "closer, closer, even closer." In short, concentrate, the intersection of two straight lines gives a point of aim, finish, say.
  8. rotmistr60
    rotmistr60 16 May 2016 10: 46
    +3
    and offer them good support from the host country

    Baltic politicians promise good support at the expense of their taxpayers and their nervous system. Probably not enough NATO soldiers beat the flowerbeds and filled their faces with the locals. And about 1000 miles he said without thinking. When you really want to remind yourself once again you can talk nonsense, the main thing is that they want to see NATO in your apartment.
  9. Same lech
    Same lech 16 May 2016 10: 49
    +1
    "The advice to the NATO summit is clear: our region needs large allied forces."


    The infrastructure of NATO is closely approaching the borders of our state.
    By all laws of war, this means preparing for an attack on us.

    Although I think after the large-scale introduction of hypersonic missiles into the armed forces of RUSSIA
    all this mouse fuss loses all meaning.

    Headquarters, information centers, warehouses, strategic factories, oil areas, all this can be destroyed in the first hour of the war with these missiles without any chance of protection from them, in the classic version, the war will lose all meaning or take on completely different forms ... which it is not yet possible to imagine I can.
  10. weksha50
    weksha50 16 May 2016 10: 50
    +2
    "Estonian Defense Ministry: we want NATO heavy equipment to be near the borders of the state"...

    Hmm ... Why are these equivocations ???

    They would have said bluntly: in our (Estonian) territory, near the borders of Russia ...
  11. Kirill750
    Kirill750 16 May 2016 10: 59
    +2
    here are the brakes !!!! would have written honestly: We want to be a target for ISKANDERS
  12. Ajent cho
    Ajent cho 16 May 2016 11: 03
    0
    Ministry of Defense of Estonia: we want
    more money and more. For the rest - do not care.
    Just do not catch it, in the ministry, that, in the event of a mess, no one is waiting for them in the environment.
  13. Hellriker
    Hellriker 16 May 2016 11: 03
    0
    They themselves are asking the Americans to stumble across their military bases. Damn, but the Baltic states should have at least some national pride and dignity.
    1. sharp-lad
      sharp-lad 16 May 2016 14: 39
      0
      All pride and dignity are spent on licking. crying
    2. The comment was deleted.
  14. Holsten
    Holsten 16 May 2016 11: 04
    +1
    Here the mongrels have dispersed - someone will surpass anyone in loyalty, devotion and ... stupidity. Points are earned before the "fateful" summit in Warsaw.
  15. Stinger
    Stinger 16 May 2016 11: 12
    +2
    No heavy equipment can save from stupidity.
  16. Evgen2x
    Evgen2x 16 May 2016 11: 17
    +1
    Psychology of slaves, everyone wants to get under someone, but their brains are not enough to choose a better master, few of them left the European Union without pants, it will be even more interesting further))
  17. Nikxnumx
    Nikxnumx 16 May 2016 11: 18
    0
    Fool cardboard, your Nata will not help you.
  18. Aleksander
    Aleksander 16 May 2016 11: 25
    0
    “No immediate improvement in the security situation in the Baltic region is expected


    He would also say WHEN did she get worse? belay
    And who began to deploy additional troops in violation of ALL agreements?
  19. BOB044
    BOB044 16 May 2016 11: 27
    0
    Estonian defense ministry: want NATO heavy equipment to be near state borders
    And rolls with toilet paper pads. And then we are in the direction of Russia, we will bark ten times louder. Paws in one word. hi
  20. HAM
    HAM 16 May 2016 11: 27
    +6
    A little bit about the Baltic states ....
  21. atamankko
    atamankko 16 May 2016 11: 33
    +1
    Allegorically, "... we ourselves are nobody ...".
  22. maximus
    maximus 16 May 2016 11: 52
    +3
    In the hospital, the children of an Italian, a Russian, a German and an Estonian were confused. They began to figure it out: first, an Italian woman - went up to the children and began to deliciously wind spaghetti on a fork. Lo and behold - one child pulls the handle. The mother takes him. Then the German woman's turn: - High Hitler !!! Looks, one also reacted. Takes away his son. Then the Russian comes up and, without saying a word, takes one of the remaining children. Estonian: - Why are you sabiraes ego? Otkuta you have a hundred is yours? Russian: - But because when the German said "High Hitler", my fists clenched, and yours crap
  23. undusk
    undusk 16 May 2016 12: 07
    +3
    A fifth of the economy of the Baltic states, including Estonia, consists of euro subsidies, which are sent there to raise the state of their economy to the average values ​​in the European Union. Support programs for the weakest countries have been extended more than once. Last lines set until 2019. Today it is clear that Estonia is not coping with the tasks set for economic growth, which, in particular, was supported by Russia with its transit traffic. If at the moment Estonia would live on loans, and not on subsidies, then its external debt would be 40% of GDP. Since the support programs will end soon, Estonia decided to promote a song about the threat from the East, so that having deployed foreign troops on its territory, they would receive money for their cantonment. One thing is clear, that for the loot they are ready to bend under anyone.
  24. K-50
    K-50 16 May 2016 12: 42
    +1
    We want the heavy equipment of the Allies to be constantly located no more than a thousand miles from us.

    Stupid people! request
    As you probably dictate to kindle a fire of war near your borders and on your territory, andrenaline in the blood begins to boil, the tone rises in organisms. But they just do not understand that if it really "flames", then the existence of the Tribaltic limitrophes can be completely forgotten by the descendants. We would have lived in peace as long as possible and did not bark. fool laughing
  25. Retvizan 8
    Retvizan 8 16 May 2016 12: 45
    +1
    Everything is very simple, they talked a lot about it and even sang it:
    ... dolls are pulled
    they have smiles on their faces ...
    ... and in the process of presentation, the impression is created that the doll can talk.
  26. Volzhanin
    Volzhanin 16 May 2016 13: 22
    0
    Gadgets, they are so funny ...
  27. tehnokrat
    tehnokrat 16 May 2016 13: 27
    0
    Quote: Stranger03
    Not, 1000 miles, it's about 1800 km.

    This is if the nautical mile (1852 m). The land is somewhat smaller, but in this case, our reconstituted 1 GWA is even three times closer even at the place of permanent deployment. And push it to Pskov, or at least Smolensk?
    Tantrums are limitrophic, why do they need it? ..
  28. KRIG55
    KRIG55 16 May 2016 14: 36
    0
    And do they not think that in the event of a serious "mess" this unfinished state will burn out along with the heavy equipment of their beloved NATO?
  29. Kotost
    Kotost 16 May 2016 15: 26
    0
    Or maybe Estonia is afraid of everything due to the fact that the Cold War has reached them only now? It is believed that they slow down "a little" what
  30. mamont5
    mamont5 16 May 2016 15: 51
    +1
    "We want allied heavy equipment to be no more than a thousand miles away at all times."

    And do not forget to draw the teddy bears on this technique, because it will be the first to be hit, in which case.
  31. Egen
    Egen 17 May 2016 05: 46
    0
    I understood why 1000 miles! This is the time for the Western troops to march before Estonia = the time required for the fast Estonian guys to pull themselves from the barracks to the point of their meeting. Otherwise, really, what's the point the earlier you leave and wait for the Estonians :)
    The second question is - who will actually be for 1000 miles? The Germans and the French have a sea of ​​problems with immigrants; they do not yet have to remove the army from the country at such a time. So, only Poland?